Galedo, Abegail P.
398. BUADO VS. CA
PETITIONER : SPOUSES ROBERTO BUADO and VENUS BUADO
RESPONDENT : Court of Appeals/ PR Romulo Nicol
DATE : April 24, 2009
PONENTE : Tinga, J.
TOPIC : Execution, Satisfaction and Effect of Judgments
FACTS:
Sps. Roberto and Venus Buado filed a complaint for damages against Erlinda with RTC Cavite.
This is in relation to the criminal offense filed against her by petitioner.
Trial court ordered Erlinda to pay damages. The Decision became final and executory and a writ
of execution was issued. Since Erlinda’s personal property are insufficient to satisfy the judgment,
deputy sheriff issued a notice of levy on real property on execution.
Two days before public auction, an affidavit of third-party claim was filed by a certain Fulo.
Petitioner put up a sheriff’s indemnity bond. Petitioner being the highest bidder, a certificate of
sale was issued in their favor.
Nicol filed a complaint for annulment of certificate of sale and damages. Respondent claimed that
there was no proper publication and posting of sale. Petitioners filed a Motion to Dismiss.
Petitioners alleged that respondent, who is the husband of judgment debtor, is not “third party” as
defined in Sec. 17 of Rule 30 of Rules of Court, hence a separate action need not be filed
ISSUE:
WON respondent, husband of judgment debtor, is a “stranger” to the suit
HELD: Petition is dismissed.
A third-party claim must be filed by a person other than judgment debtor or his agent. Only a
stranger to the case may file a third-party claim.
In Mariano vs. CA, it held that the husband of judgment debtor cannot be deemed a
“stranger” to the case prosecuted and adjudged against his wife for an obligation that has
redounded to the benefit of conjugal partnership.
In absolute community where liabilities incurred by either spouse by crime/quasi-delict are
chargeable to absolute community property. The conjugal partnership of gains has no duty to
make advance payments for liability of debtor-spouse.
It cannot be concluded that the civil obligation arising from crime of slander committed by Erlinda
redounded to the benefit of conjugal partnership. Conjugal property cannot be held liable for
personal obligation contracted by one spouses unless some advantage/benefit is shown to have
accrued to conjugal partnership.