Taxanol PDF
Taxanol PDF
FOREWORD INTRODUCTION
TEXANOL
CAS N°: 25265-77-4
UNEP PUBLICATIONS
Identifiers, Physical and Chemical properties 73
Substance
End Point : IDENTIFIERS, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Chemical Name : Propanoic acid, 2-methyl-, monoester with 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-
pentanediol
Common Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Synonyms
Chissocizer CS 12 CS 12
Isobutyraldehyde tishchenko trimer Isobutyric acid, ester with 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-
pentanediol
Texanol ester alcohol 2,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol monoisobutyrate
Overall Evaluation
EXPOSURE
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE
Based on its physiochemical properties, the test material will not be a persistent environmental contaminant.
With the exception of an unlikely spill situation (99% of the material is handled in closed tanks and drums;
formulation of latex paints, which accounts for 84% of the total use and over 97% use of the non-intermediate
use of the material is conducted in closed equipment), the only environmental exposure will be via the air during
the drying of paint. The low vapor pressure (0.013 mbar at 20C) and high boiling point (244C) of the material
would preclude high localized airborne concentrations of the test material. Estimated atmospheric residence
time for the test material is 403 hours, which predicts ultimate degradation of the test material in air.
CONSUMER EXPOSURE
The primary exposure to this substance is during its end use in latex paint, during application and subsequent
drying of the paint In order to characterize worker and consumer exposure to this material a study was
IRPTC Data Profile
74 Identifiers, Physical and Chemical properties
conducted in which airborne concentrations of the substance were measured in a study conducted to
characterize worker and consumer exposure to volatile components during field application and subsequent
drying of water based polyvinyl acetate paints. Paints were applied using airless spraying of roller/brush
methods in rooms having either 0.5 or 5.0 air changes per hour. For each scenario, a personal breathing zone
air sample was collected during application, and fixed station air samples were collected during application and
6 hours, 24 hours, and one week after application. The maximal concentration of the substance from breathing
zone samples was 0.99 ppm (during spraying applications) with a room air exchange rate of 5 air changes per
hour. At an exchange rate of 0.5 air changes per hour, the maximum concentration measured from fixed
stations during roller applications was 1.96 ppm. Overall average concentrations measured in rooms with an
exchange rate of 5.0 air changes per hour was only 0.44 ppm. The average concentration during spray
application in a room with 0.5 air changes per hour was 0.67 ppm, and the corresponding average for roller
applications was 0.37 ppm. Six hours after application, concentrations of the chemical were below the 0.33 ppm
average environmental limit of detection in the rooms with an air exchange rate of 5.0 air exchanges per hour.
At 24 hours, levels were below the limit level of detection of 0.19 ppm in 19 of 24 rooms (combined rooms
having either 0.5 or 5.0 air changes per hour). Only one of four samples collected at 7 days contained the
chemical at a concentration above the 0.01 ppm limit of detection.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
In manufacture, dry, acid-free isobutyraldehyde is self-condensed in the presence of trace sodium isobutoxide
catalyst in an enclosed, continuous manufacturing system. The product mixture is water-washed to remove the
sodium salts, and then passes through distillation columns to remove the product from other substances also
formed from the chemical reaction. The refined product typically assay 99.0% or higher. The process water is
treated to remove essentially all remaining traces of product. The manufacturing process has various vents
which release insignificant amounts of the product because of its low volatility. There are two process waste
streams containing small amount of the product. These streams are incinerated.
During manufacture, fifteen one-liter samples are taken each day (347 days per year) for analysis. Thirty
minutes are required to take and analyze each sample. This operation is rotated among 40 different workers per
year. Some dermal exposure is possible (from spilling), but it would be slight and infrequent. During equipment
maintenance, the equipment is drained free of material. Mechanics wear protective goggles and impermeable
gloves; thus, dermal exposure is negligible. Some inhalation exposure may occur during drumming and loading
tank cars (15 minute operations), but inhalation exposure is not appreciable, since the substance has a low
vapor pressure and good ventilation is provided to the work area. Industrial hygiene monitoring of the work area
indicates that the 8-hour time-weighed average air concentration of the substance is typically less than 0.5 ppm.
During processing to make plasticizer, the substance is normally stored in tanks and transported through closed
lines to continuous reactors for chemical conversion. A small number of workers could be exposed for a few
minutes when taking small quality control samples prior to chemical conversion. The low vapor pressure of the
material minimizes the level of exposure during sampling.
Minimal exposure occurs routinely during handling of the material, since it is primarily (99%) stored in closed
tanks and in closed drums. Transport is predominantly in tank cars and tank trucks.
The potential occupational exposure is low because the substance is manufactured and processed in closed
continuous equipment. Inhalation exposure is further limited by the low vapor pressure of the substance. Dermal
exposure could occure infrequently by accident or during quality control sampling; however, it is the practice to
wear impermeable gloves and other protective clothing at points of potential exposure.
Consumer exposure is likely, since the predominant use of this substance is as a coalescing aid at up to 3%
concentration in latex paints. Although the number of consumers potentially exposed is high, the level of
exposure is low (average room concentration of 0.37 ppm during roller application of latex paint in a room with
0.5 room air changes per hour) during the few days per year the average consumer spends painting.
Environmental exposure occurs primarily through volatilization of the substance from drying latex paint.
Terrestrial and aquatic exposure would occur rarely through spills. The substance is predicted to undergo
photodecomposition slowly in the atmosphere, and does not persist elsewhere in the environment, because it
biodegrades at a modest rate.
The results of the SIDS testing indicate that the substance has a relatively low order of toxicity. Because of this
low level of toxicity, low level of human exposure, and lack of persistence in the environment, it is recommended
that a low priority be assigned to this substance for further testing.
Production-Trade
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Production
Quantity Year
44359 t - P 1989
25000-50000 t/y - P
References
!SIDSP*
OECD/SIDS. Screening Information Data Set (SIDS) of OECD High
Production Volume Chemicals Programme, (1994)
Processes
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Process
Process comments : In manufacture, dry, acid-free isobutyraldehyde is self-condensed in the
presence of trace sodium isobutoxide catalyst in an enclosed, continuous
manufacturing system. The product mixture is water-washed to remove
the product from other substances also formed from the chemical
reaction. The refined product typically assays 99.0% or higher. The
process water is treated to remove essentially all remaining traces of
product. The manufacturing process has various vents which release
insignificant amounts of the product because of its volatility.
References
Uses
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Use
Quantity Year Comments
References
Study
End Point : Pathway into the Environment and Environmental Fate.
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Quantity Transported
Medium to Medium Quantity Time Year to Year
to AIR 25 t/y
Release reported in the past, but is based on a calculation method used by the State of Texas that overstimates
fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions will be determined again in 1993.
General Comments : Environmental release during customer processing is also estimated to be low
due to low vapour pressure and processing in closed equipment. Actual
environmental release data for customers who process the test material are
not available. Since 84% of this material is used as a coalescing aid for latex
paints, and is expected to evaporate during enduse, this atmospheric release
will be the major environmental release for this product. It is not expected that
this release will be concentrated in any particular geographic area or any
specific timeframe, and environmental concentrations in any locality are
expected to be negligible.
References
Study
End Point : CONCENTRATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Lifestage Sex
Test Results
Matrix Concentrations Spec. Date
0.99 ppm
The maximal concentraion of this material from breathing zone samples (during applications) with a room air
exchange rate of 5 air changes per hour.
1.96 ppm
The maximum concentration measured from fixed stations during roller applications, at an exchange rate of 0.5
air changes per hour.
0.44 ppm
Overall average concentrations measured in rooms with an exchange rate of 5.0 air changes per hour.
0.67 ppm
The average concentration during spray application in a room with 0.5 air changes per hour.
0.37 ppm
The averge concentration during roller applications in a room with 0.5 air changes per hour.
<0.33 ppm
Six hours after application, test chemical concentrations were below the 0.33 ppm average environmental limit
of detection in the rooms with an air exchange rate of 5.0 air exchanges per hour.
<0.19 ppm
At 24 hours, levels were below the limit level of detection of 0.19 ppm in 19 of 24 rooms.
>0.01-0.01 ppm
Only one of four samples collected at 7 days contained the test amterial at a concentration above the 0.01 ppm
limit of detection.
References
Primary Reference : ITCEV*
Kominsky, J. R. and Freyberg, R. W. International Technology
Corporation Exposure to Volatile Compounds of Polivinyl Acetate (PVA)
Emulsion Paints During Application and Drying : Report, (1992)
Study
End Point : CONCENTRATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Lifestage Sex
Test Results
Matrix Concentrations Spec. Date
References
Study
End Point : HUMAN INTAKE AND EXPOSURE
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex
Test Results
General Comments : PDR = Conc x IH x Dur x Freq, in which: PDR = Active inhalation potential
dose rate (mg/year); Conc = Average air concentration (mg/m3); IH =
Inhalation rate: 1.3 m3/hour, cited in above document; Dur = Duration of
exposure (hour/day) ; and Freq = Frequency of expsure (days/year). For a
commercial painter working 8 hours/day, 235 days/year, applying latex
paint containing 3% of the test chemical in a room with 0.5 air changes per
hour using the spray method (average concentration 0.67 ppm or 5.92
mg/m3), an annual worst-case dose may also be calculated.
References
Study
End Point : HUMAN INTAKE AND EXPOSURE
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex
Test Results
General Comments : During processing to make plasticizer, the substance is normally stored in
tanks and transported through closed lines to continuous reactors for
chemical conversion. A small number of workers could be exposed for a
few minutes when taking small quality control samples prior to chemical
conversion. The low vapour pressure of the material minimizes the level of
exposure during sampling. Minimal exposure occurs during handling of the
material, since it is primarily (99 %) stored in closed tanks and in closed
drums. Transport is predominantly in tank cars and tank trunks. The
primary exposure to this substance is during its end use in latex paint,
during application and subsequent drying of the paint. It is recommended
that exposure assessment for this chemical be centered on this exposure
point.
References
Study
End Point : HUMAN INTAKE AND EXPOSURE
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex
- SKN ADULT
AIR IHL
Test Results
General Comments : During manufacture, fifteen one-liter samples are taken each day (347 days
per year) for analysis. Thirty minutes are required to take and analyze each
sample. This operation is rotated among 40 different workers per year.
Some dermal exposure is possible (from spilling), but it would be slight and
infrequent. During equipment maintenance, the equipment is drained free of
material. Mechanics wear protective goggles and impermeable gloves; thus,
dermal exposure is negligible. Some inhalation exposure may occur during
drumming and loading tank cars (15 minutes operations) , but inhalation
exposure is not appreciable, since the substance has a low vapour pressure
and good ventilation is provided to the work area.
References
Study
End Point : BIODEGRADATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification
AQ SLUDG
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
(An)aerobic : AEROB
Test Results
Quantity Time Comments on result
10 % 9d Degradation on day 9
70 % 34 d Degradation on day 34
General Comments : The data indicate that 33% of the material degrades in the 10-day time
window in which 70% degradation must occur in order for the chemical
to be classified as readily biodegradable. 70% biodegradation did not
occur until day 34. The results of this test indicate, however, that the test
material is unlikely to persist in the environment, but may not be fully
removed during wastewater treatment.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Waston, H. M. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-91-020, (1991)
Study
End Point : BIODEGRADATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification
MCR AQ SLUDG
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
(An)aerobic : AEROB
Exposure
Exposure Period : 21 d
Exposure comments : A 21-day biodegradation test was conducted utilizing two sources of
acclimated sludge microorganisms. Acclimated organisms were used as
the source of inoculum for biodegradation testing. (See general
comments).
Test Results
Quantity Time Comments on result
General Comments : In one procedure, microorganisms were acclimated over a 21-day period
by making a series of adaptive transfers to increasing concentrations of
the test chemical through a series of nine acclimation flasks. In the
second procedure, microorganisms were acclimated for 11 days in a
single acclimation flask without transfer of organisms. Based on the
results of this test, the material is classified as moderately
biodegradable. All material would utimately be biodegraded.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Waston, H. M. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-85-011, (1986)
Study
End Point : PHOTODEGRADATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : FIELD
Medium : AIR
Geographic Area : USA
Test Results
Quantity Time Comments on result
General Comments : The end use of approximately 84% of the substance is a coalescing
agent at up to 3% in latex paints. The substance enters the atmosphere
during application and drying of paint through evaporation, is dispersed
and undergoes photodegradation.
References
Study
End Point : PHOTODEGRADATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Medium : AIR
Geographic Area : USA
Test Results
General Comments : Texanol does not absorb wavelengths of light above 290 nm and thus
will not be susceptible to direct (uncatalyzed) photodegradation. The
reaction of this material with hydroxide radical (OH.) will be the only
significant process by which this material would be removed from the
atmospheric environment. The following estimate can be made for the
atmospheric residence time: T(OH.) = 1 / K(OH.)(OH.) K(OH.) = 2.3E+12
cm3.mole-1.sec-1 (value for 2,2,4-trimethylpentane) and (OH.) = 3E-19
mole.cm3 (conservative value for Northern Hemisphere) Thus, T(OH.) =
1 / (2.3E+12)(3E-19) seconds or 403 hours.
References
Primary Reference : HBCPM*
Lyman, W. J. et al. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods,
Chapter 10, (1982)
Study
End Point : HYDROLYSIS
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Medium : AQ
Geographic Area : USA
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Dose / Concentration : The hydrolysis of both isomers was determined. Based on the results of
the preliminary test, further testing was conducted at pH 9. The data
from tests conducted at 50C, pH 9 provided hydrolysis profiles which
(see general comments).
Test Results
Quantity Time Comments on result
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Roser, K. S. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, 3VC3P43, (1992)
Study
End Point : BIOCONCENTRATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Test Results
References
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
RAT ORL M LD50 Oral LD50 for rats was refered as >3200
F mg/kg body weight.
General Comments : Fasted animals (4/dose) were administered the neat material by gavage at
doses of 1600 mg/kg and 3200 mg/kg. Slight transient weakness between one
and four hours after dosing with 3200 mg/kg was the only clinical abnormality
observed. There was no mortality. Prior studies in which limited numbers of
rats were administered the test chemical either neat on as a 10% solution in
corn oil yielded approximate LD50 values of 3200-6400 or 1600-3200 mg/kg.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-84-35, (1984)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
RAT ORL LD50 The single oral LD50 for rats was
determined to be 6.86 mL/kg (6517
mg/kg). The 95% confidence interval
was 4.64 - 10.1 mL/kg (4410 - 9595
mg/kg).
References
Primary Reference : TXAPA9
Carpenter, C. P. et al. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 28, 313-319,
(1974)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Eastman Kodak Company Reports, (1960)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Eastman Kodak Company Reports, (1960)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-84-35, (1984)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : TXAPA9
Carpenter, C. P. et al. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 28, 313-319,
(1974)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Eastman Kodak Company Reports, (1960)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
RAT ORL M 12 12
F 12 12
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Exposure Period : 40-51 d
Dose / Concentration : 100-1000 mg/kg BW/d
Exposure comments : Groups of rats were administered the test article by gavage at dose levels of 0,
100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day. Males received 51 doses over 51 days. Females
received between 40 and 51 doses of the test article during premating (14
days), mating (up to 14 days), pregnancy (21-22 days), and early lactation (4
days) periods.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
NEF
No treatment-related mortality occurred in this study.
GIT EXOC
Clinical signs were restricted to sialorrhea observed in males from all three dose groups and females from the
mid- and high-dose groups after administration of the test chemical. The post-dose sialorrhea may have been
due to the taste of the test article.
BEHAV 4 d
A slight statistically significant decrease in feed consumption was noted in both male and female high-dose
treatment groups at four days after the start of dosing.
NEF
No other feed consumption or body weight changes were noted.
LIVER SIZE
Heavier absolute and relative liver weights were observed in the low-, mid-, and high-dose male and female
groups.
LIVER CELL
Microscopic changes in the liver were noted in the mid- and high-dose groups and consisted of enlargement of
hepatocytes surrounding the central vein (centrilobular hepatocytomegaly ). The enlarged hepatocytes
contained cytoplasm characterised by an eosinophilic "ground glass" appearance.
The liver changes were minor in all cases and associated with increased metabolic activity resulting from test
article administration.
General Comments : The changes in the liver in the present study were considered to be associated
with metabolic activation, rather than to a toxicological effect. Because the
effects seen in the study were considered to be sequelae of metabolic
activation (liver effects) or unique to male rats (kidney effects), the testing
laboratory set the NOAEL for subchronic toxicity at 1000 mg/kg.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Faber, W. D. and Hosenfeld, R. S. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-92-
57, (1992)
Study
End Point : MAMMALIAN TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Vehicle - Solvent : Distilled water
Exposure
Exposure Type : SHORT
Exposure Period : 15 d
Dose / Concentration : 100-1000 mg/kg BW/d
Exposure comments : Groups of rats were administered the test material at doses of 0, 100, or 1000
mg/kg/day for 11 treatments over a period of 15 days.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
- BEHAV RV M
BW DECR
Tansient initial reductions in feed consumption and weight gain were observed in male rats at the 1000 mg/kg
dose level.
GIT EXOC RV
Clinical abnormalities were restricted to transient sialorrhea after administration of the test chemical.
NEF
There were no biologically significant differences between groups in red blood cells, hematocrit, white blood cell
count, and differential white blood cell count. There were a slightly lower hemoglobin concentration in the 100
mg/kg males, and a slightly lower platelet count in the
100 mg/kg females, but these differences were not dose related and were considered unrelated to the test
chemical.
NEF
Clinical chemistries (alanine amino transferase, aspartate aminotransferase, sorbitol dehydrogenase, alkaline
phosphatase, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and glucose) were not affected by exposure to the test chemical.
LIVER SIZE
Slight increases in absolute and relative liver weights were noted in both males and females from the 1000
mg/kg group.
NEF
Absolute and relative renal weights were comparable to controls.
KIDNY STRUC M
Histopathologic examination revealed mild changes (hyaline droplet formation, a frequently observed sex- and
species- specific phenomenon) in kidneys from males at both the 100 and 1000 mg/kg dose levels.
General Comments : Based on slightly increased liver weights in females at the 1000 mg/kg dose
level, the no-effect dose for the female rat was 100 mg/kg. Under the
conditions of this study, a no-effect dose was not obtained for males. Liver
weights were increased and hyaline droplets (a sex- and species-specific
effect) were seen in the kidneys in the 1000 mg/kg males, hyaline droplets
were also seen in the 100 mg/kg males.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-84-35, (1984)
Study
End Point : MUTAGENICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
BACT VTR
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
NEF
Negative results. No increase in revertants was noted for concentrations between 10 mg/plate and 3164
mg/plate.
CELL
Minimum concentration at wich toxicity to bacteria was observed: 3164 mg/plate with and without metabolic
activation.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-85-5, (1985)
Study
End Point : MUTAGENICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
MOUSE
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
NEF
No significant increase in micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic erthrocytes was seen under the conditions
of this assay in any dose group at any harvested time.
NEF
No effect on Mitotic Index or P/N Ratio was seen at any dose level.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Barber, E. D. et al. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-91-309, (1992)
Study
End Point : SENSITIZATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
SKN
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, (1984)
Study
End Point : IRRITATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
GPIG SKN
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Exposure Type : ACUTE
Exposure Period : 24 h
Dose / Concentration : 5-20 mL/kg BW
Exposure comments : Animals were administered a dose of 20 mL/kg (three animals), 10 mL/kg (one
animal) or 5 mL/kg (one animal) to the depilated abdomen under an occlusive
wrap for 24 hours.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
SKIN IRRIT
Minimal irritation (slight to moderate erythema) was observed. Using the Draize method of evaluation, the
maximum score in a single animals at 24 hours was 2. The average score at 24 hour was 0.7. The maximum
score at 48 hours was 1. The average score at 48 hours was 0.3.
General Comments : The material was classified as a slight skin irritant.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-84-35, (1984)
Study
End Point : IRRITATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
GPIG SKN
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Exposure Type : SHORT
Exposure Period : 9d
Dose / Concentration : 0.5 mL/ ANIMAL
Exposure comments : A group of 5 animals were repeatedly administered 0.5 mL of the test chemical
topically to the clipped skin of the back for a total of nine doses over an eleven-
day period. Both primary irritation and exacerbation of effects were measured.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
- NEF
SKIN IRRIT
No irritation or exacerbation was observed at the site of application in any of the 5 treated guinea pigs during
the first week of dosing. During the second week, slight, transient irritation was observed in three of five
animals.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-84-35, (1984)
Study
End Point : IRRITATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
RBT SKN
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
SKIN IRRIT
Application of the test material resulted in an irritation score of 3 using the grading procedure used in the
Federal Hazardous Substances Act method, 21CFR, Past 191.
References
Primary Reference : TXAPA9
Carpenter, C. P. et al. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 28, 313-319,
(1974)
Study
End Point : IRRITATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
RBT OCU 6
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Exposure Type : ACUTE
Exposure comments : The material was instilled into six rabbit eyes. Three eyes were washed
immediately.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
EYE IRRIT RV
Based on moderate (grade 2) erythema of the conjunctiva, the maximum score in a single unwashed eye was 4
(of a possible score of 110) after 24 hours.
EYE NEF
No signs of irritation were seen in washed eyes at any time. At 48 hours, the score for all eyes was 0.
General Comments : Based on the effects observed in unwashed eyes, the material was classified
as a slight to moderate eye irritant.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
O'Donoghue, J. L. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-84-35, (1984)
Study
End Point : IRRITATION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
RBT OCU
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
EYE IRRIT
A grade of 4 was obtained using the evaluation procedure outlined in the Federal Hazardous Substances Act,
21CFR, Part 191.
References
Primary Reference : TXAPA9
Carpenter, C. P. et al. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 28, 313-319,
(1974)
Study
End Point : REPRODUCTION
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Exposure Period : 40-51 d
Dose / Concentration : 100-1000 mg/kg BW/d
Exposure comments : Groups of rats were administered the test article by gavage at doses of 0, 100,
300 or 1000 mg/kg/day. Females received between 40 and 51 doses during
premating (14 days), mating (up to 14 days), pregnancy (21-22 days), and
easy lactation (14 days) periods. All males received 51 doses over 51 days.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
NEF
There were no toxicologically significant differences between the control and treated groups with respect to
reproduction and development in male and/or female rats. Evidence for copulation was noted for a all animals.
NEF
There were no differences in the number of pregnancies, number of live or dead pups, total number of implants,
prenatal loss, percent survival, total litter weight, mean pup weight, pup survival, or postnatal growth.
General Comments : Administration of the test article did not affect reproductive performance.
NOEL for reproductive toxicity was 1000 mg/kg.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Faber, W. D. and Hosenfeld, R. S. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-92-
57, (1992)
Study
End Point : TERATOGENICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Exposure Type : SHORT
Exposure Period : 40-51 d
Dose / Concentration : 100-1000 mk/kg BW/d
Exposure comments : Groups of rats were administered the test article by gavage at dose levels of 0,
100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day. Female rats received between 40 and 51 doses
during premating (14 days), mating (up to 14 days), pregnancy (21-22 days,
and early lactation (4 days) period. Males received 51 doses over 51 days.
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
NEF
Administration of the test article did not affect reproductive performance in terms of mean number of live or
dead pups/litter, total implants, prenatal loss, percent survival, total litter weight, mean pup weight, pup survival
, external defects, and postnatal growth.
Although two dams in the high-dose group had small litters, and one pregnant dam had a full term pregnancy
but no pups were found, the remaining seven litters in the high dose group averaged more pups per litter than
the control group. When the litter size data were ranked and analyzed, the high
-dose group of dams were also shown to have a statistically greater number of pups than the control.
General Comments : Within the design parameters of the protocol for this test, there were no
toxicologically significant differences between the control and treated groups
with respect to reproduction and development. The NOEL for developmental
toxicity was 1000 mg/kg.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Faber, N. D. and Hosenfeld, R. S. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, TX-92-
57, (1992)
Study
End Point : AQUATIC ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Substance
Description of the test : Purity: 99%; nominal concentration of 10 uL/L - 100 uL/L of texanol in diluent
substance water.
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Ziegler, D. A. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-84-109, (1985)
Study
End Point : AQUATIC ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
IRPTC Data Profile
110 Aquatic Acute Toxicity
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Ziegler, D. A. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-84-109, (1985)
Study
End Point : AQUATIC ACUTE TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Test Results
Organism Medium Spec. Route Lifestage Sex Effect Effect Comments
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Ziegler, D. A. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-84-109, (1985)
Study
End Point : AQUATIC TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Evaluations
Evaluation text : Long-term tests e.g., reproduction: no data available. Chronic daphnia, pillbug,
sideswimmer, flatworm, aquatic worm, or snail studies are not deemed
necessary because substance shows low acute toxicity to these organisms.
References
Study
End Point : AQUATIC TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
ALGAE AQ FRESH
Test Substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
EC50
The 72-hour EC value, based on analytically measured amounts of material, was 18.4 mg/L.
NOEC
NOEC (no observed effect concentration) at 72 hours was 3.28 g/L.
NEL
Maximum concentration at which no effect was observed within the period of the test = 3.28 mg/L.
LOEC
Minimum concentration at which effect was observed within the period of the test = 7.28 mg/L.
General Comments : concentration based upon the area under the growth curves. The test material
is rated "moderately toxic" to the test species. However, since the test
substance is ultimately biodegradable, if it were to reach the environment,
adverse effects on algal growth are anticipated to be minimal.
References
Primary Reference : MALPI*
Hughes, J. S. and Alexander, M. M. Malcom Pirnie. The toxicity of HAEL No
91-0053 to Selenastrum Capricornutum
Study
End Point : AQUATIC TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
MCR AQ
Test Substance
Description of the test : Purity: 99%
substance
Exposure
Exposure Period : 5h
Dose / Concentration : 0.215-215 mg/L
Exposure comments : This test utilized secondary waste treatment micro-organisms which are
characteristic of actual treatment plant sludge, and which were cultured in a
continuous-flow laboratory sludge unit. (see general comments).
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
EC50
EC50 for inhibition >= 215 mg/L
NOAEL
Exposure to 21.5 mg/L, 2.15 mg/L, and 0.215 mg/L had no adverse effect on glucose metabolism.
General Comments : Test exposures were conducted in respirometer flasks containing the test
chemical, sludge, (14C) glucose, and 0.02 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.9. The
test article exposure flasks contained the test chemical at concentrations of
215 mg/L, 21.5 mg/L, 2.15 mg/L, or 0.215 mg/L. The negative control
exposure flasks contained K2Cr2O7 at 333, 167, 33, and 3.3 mg/L. All
exposures were performed simultaneously and in triplicate; with gentle shaking.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Ziegler, D. A. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-84-109, (1985)
Study
End Point : TERRESTRIAL TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
BIRD
General Comments : No data available. This material is manufactured and used in such a way that
significant exposure of avian life to appreciable concentrations of this
substance is deemed remote.
References
Study
End Point : TERRESTRIAL TOXICITY
Chemical Name : Texanol
CAS Number : 25265-77-4
Study type : LAB
Geographic Area : USA
Test Subject
Organism Medium Specification Route Lifestage Sex Number exposed Number controls
Test Substance
Description of the test : 95 mg/L (100 uL/L)
substance
Purity Grade : 99%
Exposure
Dose / Concentration : 95 mg/L
Exposure comments : Four replicates of twenty radish, lettuce, and ryegrass seeds were dispersed in
growth pouches (a total of 80 seeds for each type of plant). 20 mL of test
chemical at a nominal conc. of 95 mg/L (100 uL/L) was added to (see general
comments)
Test Results
Affected in
Organ Effect Rev. OnSet Sex Exposed - Controls
--------- ----------- ------- ------------------- ------- -----------------------------
NOEC
Maximum concentration at which no effect was observed within the period of the test: no effect was seen at 95
mg/L (100 uL/L) in any of the species tested (7 days).
LOEC
Minimum (lowest) concentration at which effect was observed within the period of the test: not observed. Plants
were exposed only to a concentration of 95 mg/L (100 uL/L).
General Comments : Each growth pouch, and pouches were placed in a light-tight chamber for
seven days at room temperature. Criteria for inhibition were values of less than
90% of the concurrent control group for any of the three end points.
References
Primary Reference : #URKOD*
Ziegler, D. A. Eastman Kodak Company Reports, ES-84-109, (1985)