Presentations at The Solar Workshop On 24 January 2018 PDF
Presentations at The Solar Workshop On 24 January 2018 PDF
List of presentations
1. Methodology for solar PV assessment, presented by Dr. Nguyen Anh Tuan, Institute of
Energy
2. Final results on theoretical and technical potentials of solar PV, presented by Mr. Vu
Huy Hung, Institute of Energy
3. Final results on economic potential and cluster analysis, presented by Dr. Nguyen Anh
Tuan, Institute of Energy
4. Assessment of environmental, economical and social impacts, presented by Ms. Dang
Huong Giang, Institute of Energy
5. PV Project Implementation, presented by Mr. Yannis Vasilopoulos, Becquerel Institute
6. From PV Potential to PV development. Lessons’ learnt, presented by Mr. Yannis
Vasilopoulos, Becquerel Institute
Hanoi, 24.01.2018
Contents
(Source: U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis, NREL, June 2012)
Questionaire
Inception workshop Proposal of 16
List of
Maps of solar Land uses data focal provinces
interviewees
radiation Vietnam Infrastructure data
(MOIT/CIENAT) Atmospheric data
Estimate
Estimate
technical
technical Plausibility check
potential of
potential
solar power
Assess of
economic
potential
Theoretical potential
= Solar energy intercepted by the earth's surface
– Solar energy reflected by the atmosphere back to
space
Spatial
database
Urban areas
Roads
Agriculture
Land uses
Elevations
The total array power density depends on the array spacing as well as the individual module
efficiency. If deployed horizontally with no spacing between modules, the array power density
would be equal to the module power density (100–150 MWp/km2 for silicon modules). A review
of several large projects and discussions with several system installers indicates a minimum
spacing for service vehicles of about 3.5 m between rows and an even more conservative approach
of 4–5 m applied in reality. The current practice, stipulated by the regulation of MOIT requires 1.2-
1.3ha /MWp, equivalent to 77-82MWp/km2. Assuming the ratio DC/AC = 1.35, we are able to get
the PV power density equal 55-60 MW/km2 (AC) for fixed array system. For an average number,
taking into account the various configuration of the land surface and slopes, etc. , it is appropriate
to adopt the average power density equal 50 MW/km2.
Capacity factors proposed for 3 regions: HSCSnorth = 0.15; HSCSsouth = HSCScenter = 0.18
Economic potential in this report is defined as the subset of the available resource
technical potential where the cost required to generate the electricity (which
determines the minimum revenue requirements for development of the resource) is
below the revenue available in terms of displaced energy and displaced capacity.
(*): Giá trị dự kiến, sẽ được tính toán chi tiết sau
For calculating the most typical value of LCOE, consultant team chose
one typical solar power plant with the following features:
Investment cost = 1029$/kWp, WACC = 10.25%
Typical parameters Value
Capacity 50MW
Operation year 2019
Lifetime used for economic and financial calculations 20 years
Specific investment cost (Detailes in appendix, including cost 1029 $/kWp
of 10km connecting line and cost of 1.5km traffic road)
O&M cost (reducing 0.03% /year due to technology progress 35 $/kW/year
application and cost optimization)
Cost of Inverter replacement in 10th year of the project 50$/kWp
WACC (ratio 30:70) 10.25%
Inflation rate (by US$) 2%
Performance efficiency 80%
Efficiency reduction rate 0.5%/year
For calculating the most typical value of LCOE, consultant team chose
one typical solar power plant with the following features:
Investment cost = 950$/kWp, WACC = 8.5%
Typical parameters Value
Capacity 50MW
Operation year 2019
Lifetime used for economic and financial calculations 20 years
Specific investment cost (Detailes in appendix, including cost 950 $/kWp
of 10km connecting line and cost of 1.5km traffic road)
O&M cost (reducing 0.03% /year due to technology progress 35 $/kW/year
application and cost optimization)
Cost of Inverter replacement in 10th year of the project 50$/kWp
WACC (ratio 30:70) 8.5%
Inflation rate (by US$) 2%
Performance efficiency 80%
Efficiency reduction rate 0.5%/year
For calculating the most typical value of LCOE, consultant team chose
one typical solar power plant with the following features:
Investment cost = 795$/kWp, WACC = 7.8%
Typical parameters Value
Capacity 50MW
Operation year 2019
Lifetime used for economic and financial calculations 20 years
Specific investment cost (Detailes in appendix, including cost 795 $/kWp
of 10km connecting line and cost of 1.5km traffic road)
O&M cost (reducing 0.03% /year due to technology progress 35 $/kW/year
application and cost optimization)
Cost of Inverter replacement in 10th year of the project 50$/kWp
WACC (ratio 30:70) 7.8%
Inflation rate (by US$) 2%
Performance efficiency 80%
Efficiency reduction rate 0.5%/year
Study team carried out cluster analysis with aim to classify areas for prioritizing development
based on criteria of close distance to power lines and the distance to the nearest road. Cluster
criteria are applied following space constrain K-Nearest-neighbor by distance EUCLIDEAN.
Indicator GHI is used for cluster analysis.
After considering factors impacting on LCOE of solar power plant, the study team proposed
preparing the list of prioritized clusters for development in periods based on 3 factors which
most impact on economic effectiveness, i.e. Global horizontal irradiation (GHI), connection
distance to power line (km) and distance from the power plant to the nearest road (km).
With values calculated for 3 above mentioned criteria for each cluster, study team could calculate
LCOE (above described) and based on this, proposed priority orders for solar power
development for each cluster in period 2021 - 2025 and 2026-2030, in the principle that areas
(clusters) which have higher economic benefits (the lowest LCOE) will be prioritized for
development first. The results are presented in the following presentation.
1. Theoretical potential
2. Technical potential
Input data
Three main data sources are used for calculation
of solar power potential map (2003-2012):
On ground measurement system (data of
sunshine hours for 30 years (1983-2012)
from171 measurement stations in the whole
country; 14 automatic measurement stations
measuring components of solar irradiation.
Satellite images (from metrological satellite
channel IODC and MTSAT2 combined)
Using reanalyzed meteorological data from
weather forecasting models - NWPM
(reanalyzed data of MACC and NCEP/NCAR).
Algorithm k-means
Sunlight hours
Model RET2
Covered by cloud
Input data to model REST2 from
MACC and NCEP
Urban land
Protected Distance to
land… land Technical
Excluded land
Water surface potential
land
Land available
Traffic land for project
Intermediate results
Protected Topography
land DEM
Map of Map of
technical capacity
potential (MW) for
technical
areas
potential
areas
2. Technical potential 21
22
Gia Lai
Hà Giang
419837.4
174280.5
7633.4
3168.7
23 Hà Nam 2964.9 53.9
24 Hà Nội 11606.6 211.0
25 Hà Tĩnh 93818.7 1705.8
STT Vung Tên tỉnh Vùng (km2) Công suất (MW) HSCS Sản lượng (MWh/y)
1 Miền Nam An Giang 8.2 411.3 0.18 648,499
2 Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu 105.1 5,257.5 0.18 8,289,961
3 Bạc Liêu 1.5 77.4 0.18 122,010
4 Bến Tre 80.6 4,032.2 0.18 6,357,949
5 Bình Dương 711.7 35,586.0 0.18 56,111,980
6 Bình Phước 863.8 43,189.3 0.18 68,100,961
7 Đồng Nai 77.6 3,879.8 0.18 6,117,728
8 Đồng Tháp 29.2 1,459.8 0.18 2,301,782
9 Hồ Chí Minh 73.0 3,652.4 0.18 5,759,084
10 Long An 268.8 13,440.1 0.18 21,192,293
11 Sóc Trăng 14.3 714.4 0.18 1,126,447
12 Tây Ninh 476.3 23,813.6 0.18 37,549,294
13 Tiền Giang 23.7 1,186.6 0.18 1,870,980
14 Trà Vinh 11.7 587.1 0.18 925,762
15 Miền Trung Bình Định 10.8 538.5 0.18 849,131
16 Bình Thuận 224.1 11,206.2 0.18 17,669,992
17 Đắk Lắk 264.9 13,247.1 0.18 20,888,084
18 Đắk Nông 151.9 7,593.7 0.18 11,973,756
19 Gia Lai 249.2 12,461.2 0.18 19,648,881
20 Khánh Hòa 136.6 6,832.4 0.18 10,773,277
21 Kon Tum 22.2 1,110.4 0.18 1,750,868
22 Lâm Đồng 146.1 7,303.6 0.18 11,516,392
23 Ninh Thuận 118.7 5,934.9 0.18 9,358,131
24 Phú Yên 7.6 381.9 0.18 602,159
25 Quảng Ngãi 1.5 77.2 0.18 121,762
Tổng 4,079.5 203,975 321,627,162
Cây thân thảo (> 50%) / cây và bụi cây (<50%) Mosaic herbaceous cover (>50%) / tree and shrub (<50%) 0.189
Cây khảm và cây bụi (>50%) / cây thân thảo (<50%) Mosaic tree and shrub (>50%) / herbaceous cover (<50%) 683.765
Cây bụi hoặc cây cỏ che nắng / nước mặn / nước hanh Shrub or herbaceous cover flooded fresh/saline/brakish
khô water 27.597
Cây bụi Shrubland 67.533
Cây bụi sớm rụng Shrubland deciduous 1.293
Cây bụi thường xanh Shrubland evergreen 377.272
Cây lá rộng (>40%) Tree cover broadleaved deciduous closed (>40%) 0.189
Tree cover broadleaved deciduous closed to open
Cây lá rộng sớm rụng (>15%) (>15%) 209.304
Tree cover needleleaved evergreen closed to open
Cây lá kim thường xanh (>15%) (>15%) 141.169
Cây che phủ nước mặn Tree cover flooded saline water 25.499
Che phủ bởi cây hoặc bụi Tree or shrub cover 7.880
Các khu vực trống không hợp nhất Unconsolidated bare areas 0.028
Tổng Grand Total 4,079.492
1. Economic potential – 1
2
Miền Bắc Điện Biên
Lai Châu
436.3
102.3
21,815
5,114
0.15
0.15
28,665,468
6,720,389
3 Sơn La 1,015.5 50,774 0.15 66,716,601
scenario 1B 4 Nghệ An 3.6 182 0.15 238,882
5 Thanh Hoá 1.5 74 0.15 97,593
6 Miền Nam An Giang 67.3 3,364 0.18 5,305,001
7 Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu 159.0 7,951 0.18 12,537,897
8 Bạc Liêu 207.5 10,374 0.18 16,358,037
9 Bến Tre 157.8 7,889 0.18 12,439,584
10 Bình Dương 711.9 35,595 0.18 56,126,044
11 Bình Phước 863.8 43,189 0.18 68,100,961
12 Cà Mau 228.6 11,430 0.18 18,022,444
13 Cần Thơ 1.9 95 0.18 149,435
14 Đồng Nai 414.5 20,725 0.18 32,679,282
15 Đồng Tháp 39.9 1,993 0.18 3,143,121
16 Hậu Giang 51.6 2,582 0.18 4,071,244
17 Hồ Chí Minh 98.8 4,939 0.18 7,788,446
18 Kiên Giang 42.9 2,145 0.18 3,381,804
19 Long An 318.1 15,903 0.18 25,076,054
20 Sóc Trăng 102.5 5,123 0.18 8,078,159
21 Tây Ninh 476.3 23,814 0.18 37,549,294
22 Tiền Giang 194.6 9,729 0.18 15,341,054
23 Trà Vinh 132.5 6,627 0.18 10,449,968
24 Vĩnh Long 32.7 1,637 0.18 2,580,918
25 Miền Trung Bình Định 426.5 21,324 0.18 33,623,556
26 Bình Thuận 342.7 17,134 0.18 27,017,431
27 Đà Nẵng 24.9 1,247 0.18 1,966,600
28 Đắk Lắk 1,163.2 58,159 0.18 91,704,699
29 Đắk Nông 769.3 38,467 0.18 60,655,416
30 Gia Lai 1,609.2 80,461 0.18 126,870,612
31 Khánh Hòa 403.9 20,197 0.18 31,845,864
32 Kon Tum 905.0 45,250 0.18 71,350,242
33 Lâm Đồng 678.7 33,933 0.18 53,506,332
34 Ninh Thuận 165.7 8,285 0.18 13,063,552
35 Phú Yên 527.7 26,387 0.18 41,607,590
36 Quảng Bình 162.8 8,140 0.18 12,835,380
37 Quảng Nam 678.4 33,921 0.18 53,486,718
38 Quảng Ngãi 616.6 30,832 0.18 48,615,664
39 Quảng Trị 185.0 9,249 0.18 14,583,232
40 Thừa Thiên Huế 154.8 7,741 0.18 12,205,266
14,675.8 733,792.2 1,136,555,831
With solar radiation in Vietnam (according to GHI), and LCOE from some
standard power plants with assumed CAPEX and WACC, economic potential is
zero for scenario 2A when electricity tariff is equal to avoided cost tariff for
each region.
With values calculated for 3 above mentioned criteria for each cluster, study
team could calculate LCOE (above described) and based on this proposed
priority orders for solar power development for each cluster in period 2021 -
2025 and 2026-2030, in principle that areas (clusters) which have higher
economic benefits (the lowest LCOE) will be prioritized for development first.
The results are presented in the following tables.
potential – Scenario 1A 18
5
1,817.9
1,829.0
1.7795
5.3224
1.0647
1.4624
1.0437
1.5463
0.0703
0.0706
10 1,820.7 5.6764 2.5538 1.0448 0.0708
21 1,824.1 13.5754 1.8865 1.3598 0.0708
11 1,831.5 6.4835 2.6388 1.3754 0.0708
24 1,843.5 185.9327 5.6432 1.2395 0.0712
30 1876.8 0.8784 9.8556 1.1516 0.0713
28 1,845.3 40.6122 6.5982 1.3085 0.0716
3 1,828.1 9.7296 4.5882 1.3753 0.0716
2 1,819.2 2.0991 6.7790 1.2421 0.0726
15 1,876.0 1.7448 13.7032 1.0732 0.0726
26 1,923.3 6.0560 19.7475 0.9279 0.0727
19 1,828.8 6.7942 8.5353 1.4590 0.0731
17 1,838.5 57.1327 10.4850 1.3359 0.0733
6 1,823.5 6.0659 8.7029 2.0316 0.0741
7 1,824.2 2.5184 14.2906 1.0085 0.0748
4 1,831.0 11.2179 16.4593 1.5770 0.0760
23 1,887.0 8.5523 25.9025 1.6679 0.0772
Based on preliminary classification results for prioritizing development of areas with the
lowest LCOE in Central and Southern regions, the study team found that:
1. The Central region has the lowest LCOE, high economic potential of solar PV power
development, therefore, economic potential will be almost fully developed in period 2021-
2025, brining in the highest economic benefits for the country. Some areas (cluster 24 & 4),
where LCOE is relatively higher than that in other areas, will be developed in the period
2026- 2030.
2. In the Southern region, the areas to be developed in period 2021 – 2025 include Tay Ninh,
Binh Duong, Binh Phuoc (cluster 20), border area between Dong Nai and Binh Thuan, Long
An, Ba Ria- Vung Tau (cluster 16).
3. Other areas with economic potential of solar PV power will be developed in period 2026 –
2030
4. With the above mentioned development priority orders scenario, in period 2021 – 2025,
137GW of solar power economic potential will be developed, mainly in Central area and Tay
Ninh, Binh Duong, Binh Phuoc.
5. The remained portion of economic potential ( 66GW) should be prioritized to develop in
period 2025 – 2030, concentrated in Southern provinces, and highland areas.
In scenario 1B, there are many economic potential areas, including areas in the North, which are
classified according to economic solar power development priority orders proposed by Study Team
through result analysis, are as follows :
1. Similar to the above mentioned low scenario, Central region has the lowest LCOE, high
economic potential of solar power, therefore, most economic potential will be fully
developed in period 2021- 2025, brining in the highest economic benefits for the country.
Some areas, where LCOE is relatively higher than that in other areas, will be developed in
the period 2026- 2030. 187GW is anticipated to be developed in these areas under this high
scenario.
2. In the Southern region, the areas to be developed in period 2021 – 2025 include Tay Ninh,
Binh Duong, Binh Phuoc (cluster 20), entire Dong Nai and Binh Thuan, Long An, , Ba Ria-
Vung Tau (cluster 16).
3. Other land areas with economic potential of solar power will be developed in period 2026 – 2030,
including all economic potential area of the Northern region.
4. With the above development priority order scenario, in period 2021 – 2025, 424GW of solar power
economic potential will be developed, mainly in Tay Ninh, Binh Duong, Binh Phuoc and Central region.
5. The remained portion of economic potential ( 309 GW) should be prioritized to develop in period 2025 –
2030, concentrated in Southern provinces, and highland areas, and entire area of the Northern region.
Solar potential assessment study developed a scientific and accuracy methodology for
assessment of solar power theoretical potential, technical potential and economic
potential based on the international experience.
Even though there are many limitations, especially digital maps lacking of input data
and actual data are unproved, the solar potential assessment study, which was first
time carried out in Vietnam based on digital GIS maps, has provided detailed
assessment of solar potentials on space maps which quantified figures by province,
area as well as preliminary assessment of environmental impacts of solar power
development according to quantification criteria.
The analysis results indicate that Vietnam has huge solar energy potential (see table
below) which is relatively evenly distributed in Central and Southern regions and
partially in northwest areas of the Northern region.
360,000 GW 6,888 GW
Analysis of scenarios shows that calculation results strongly fluctuate and depend on
input assumptions, especially for economic potential. The results of cluster analysis
indicate that areas which need priority on development are the best economic
potential areas which have the lowest social costs and also need better support
mechanism such as development of infrastructure (roads, power system and power
substations, etc.).
Even though results are still limited and very preliminary because of insufficient input
database, this study is a break-through step in application of GIS tools in renewable
energy planning in general and solar power planning in particular. The study
quantified solar potentials which were only qualitatively estimated in the previous
studies. It needs the next studies for finalizing results, reviewing, making more
accurate data and assessment of market potential and plan implementation …
Grid connected solar power projects require large flat land areas. These land
areas are anticipated from unused land, shifting forest land, agricultural land,
water surface land, people land, public structure land … into industrial land
for projects. These lands will be restored to the initial state at the end of
projects.
Solar power projects are concentrated in Central and Southern regions, where
the total solar irradiation is highest in the country.
Central region: unused land, wild land, production forest land will be used for
solar power projects
South west area: Changing land use purpose of inefficient salt production land
and inundated land, inefficient one crop land and inefficient production forest
land.
South east area: Changing land use purpose of semi-inundated land of HPP
reservoirs and brushwood land and vegetable carpet.
Solar power plants are planned to be constructed in public land, wild land ,
exhausted land, one-crop land, inefficient agricultural land, production forest
land, salt production land, hydropower reservoir land …. According to results
of investigation in 2017, number of households to be removed from solar
power project areas during preparation of supplemented plan and
construction time is small. In future, construction of solar power plants will
impact very little on resettlement and replacement of households. The
damages of households will be compensated by project owners in accordance
with regulations.
Solar power plants use solar energy for electricity generation, not creating
dusts, toxic gases, especially GHG emission which causes climate change on
the earth.
These are positive impacts because reduction of fossil fuels means
reduction of dusts and ash in comparison with coal fired power plant with
the same amount of generated electricity.
The negative impacts of solar power projects is occupancy of large land areas and
impacts in construction period.
In order to mitigate impacts on land area use, in planning stage, it needs to choose
proper land areas which have potential for development of solar power such as
wild land , exhausted agricultural land, production forest land, inundated land ….
The construction measures will be applied for each project during construction
stage in order to reduce negative impacts. It should to comply with environmental
protection measures specified in regulations so that projects meet environmental
standards.
In the plant dismantlement stage when solar plants end their lifetime and
terminate operation, a dismantlement plan is necessary for avoiding impacts of
dusts and exhausted gases emission, gathering wastes and used solar panels. It also
needs a re-plantation program to bring land to the initial state.
Wednesday, January 24, 2018 MOIT/GIZ Energy Support Programme 71
5. Conclusions and recommendations
Indicators 1 GW 10 GW 100 GW
Solar power also brings in other socio-economic benefits such as supplying electricity to
the national power grid, satisfying a portion of power demand for socio-economic
development of the area and the whole country.
Solar power also helps diversification of power sources and energy security, providing
job opportunities, reducing dependence on import of fossil fuels and promoting rural
electrification in remote, isolated mountainous areas..
PV PROJECT
FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS
International and local Legal, technical, financial
financial institutions that and accounting advisors
offer debt financing to the are hired by the
project sponsor. In some stakeholders to assist with
cases 3rd party equity their expertize in the
investors and bridge project implementation
financing is also required.
Phases of a standard PV Project
Implementation Phases (> 50MW plant) Indicative Tasks Indicative Time
Structure installation
40 – 30 – 20 rule
Training sessions
Mix working groups
Security is essential
Foundations – Civil Works
Geology and hydrology study to define drainage works
Becquerelinstitute.org
6. From PV Potential to PV
development. Lessons’ learnt.
• This electricity is converted with an inverter into AC that can be injected into the
grid or used to power electric appliances.
• Not to be mixed with CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) or Solar Thermal (producing
heat)
DISTRIBUTED and CENTRALIZED
Distributed PV Producers
Revenues
= Electricity sales
Wholesale market
Revenues One
prices or feed-in tariff
= technology or PPA
Savings on the
electricity bill
Prosumers Centralized PV
DISTRIBUTED and CENTRALIZED
Distributed PV Centralized PV
Energy localy consumed
Prosumers rather than being injected
into the grid
One
technology
N/A
Producers
CENTRALIZED PV - Utility-scale
TRENDS
- < 3 USDcents/kWh is now feasible in areas
with high solar irradiation.
- Reducing costs is still the challenge
- Ad hoc modules
- Bifacial modules (see on the right)
- Longer lifetime (with repowering)
- …
- Movable PV systems (for shorter
projects)
- From fields to… water floatting PV
systems
- Double use of land: PV for agriculture.
A Scalable Technology for all
Applications Sizes
• Can be connected to the
grid (99%) or off-grid (1%)
• System size starts at 40W
(Solar Home Systems)
• Residential (5kW),
commercial 50kW),
industrial systems (500kW)
• Solar Farms: from 1 MW to
the largest (2016): 1 GW
(China)
• Building Integrated (BIPV)
SCALE OF SYSTEMS
Ideal system size?
Largest system currently developed: 1 GW
(China, India)
1 to 100 MW represent the usual range.
Larger systems exist but in total, number
is limited.
- 50th largest = 104 MWp
- 100th largest = 67 MWp
- 150th largest = 50 MWp
System size often depends on regulations
and policy choices. Call for tenders can
impose a system size (Jordan, Dubai). In
order countries, it is not defined. System
size can depend on the cost of grid
connection.
Larger systems are more complex to
connect to the grid.
Feed-in tariff systems have a tendency to
produce smaller systems.
Mix of distributed and centralized is a
underestimations
PV development
has always been
underestimated.
It has been
faster than what
many regulators
thought.
It is important to
assess its
development
correctly.
2. From potential to market
rationale
Transforming the PV potential into real installations
requires a dedicated set of policies and the right
environment.
PV
produces
electricity
during the
day,
contrary to
wind.
System stability #2
- A part of
PV
electricity
is locally
consumed
(prosumers
), the rest
is injected
into the
grid.
System stability #3
Becquerelinstitute.org