George Webb Sweigert vs. CNN
George Webb Sweigert vs. CNN
through his own pro see counsel, and states his Complaint for Defamation against
INTRODUCTION
1. In 1980, Ted Turner defied skeptics and successfully founded CNN, the
6. According to its 2018 Form 10-K filing and Annual Report, AT&T, Inc.’s
2018 operating revenue was $170.756 Billion and its net income was $19.953 Billion.
7. According to Time Warner Inc. n/k/a Warner Media, LLC’s 2017 Form
10- K filing, CNN reached 91.4 million domestic households and more than 350
echo chamber for manipulated and politicized commentary and “fake news,”
CNN launched a new branding campaign, “Facts First,” which is pinned to the
Trump as the 45th President of the United States, CNN has maintained a well-
known and easily documented biased agenda against President Trump and
President.
11. Between June 17th, 2017 and October 29th, 2019 at the time of this
writing, CNN brought down the full force of its corporate power, influence, and
12. Contrary to its “Facts First” public relations ploy, CNN ignored the facts
and put its anti-Trump agenda first in waging a three and a half year campaign
of false, vicious attacks against George Webb Sweigert, a self financed, citizen
Sanders in 2016.
13. CNN’s vicious attack on George Webb Sweigert included at least three
(3) defamatory television broadcasts and forty two (42) months of continuous
being in a plot to create alarm in the Port of Charleston when he in fact was in
Ohio covering a story of missing uranium and an eight way murder of every
14. More specifically, CNN falsely asserted that George Webb Sweigert
when in fact George Webb Sweigert had discounted these initial reports, and
clearly contradicted them by saying any likely attack by the Pakistani terrorist
Daewoo Ibrahim would occur at his main drug port, the US Naval Base in
correct the record, CNN has ignored these requests for forty two (42) months.
16. The CNN accusations are totally and unequivocally false and CNN
would have known them to be untrue had it undertaken any reasonable efforts
to verify their accuracy before publication of its false and defamatory
accusations.
Sweigert, in June of 2020, making outlandish and false claims that somehow
18. CNN ignored death threats provided by George Webb Sweigert to CNN
Reporter, Donie O’Sullivan, clearly showing a Navy veteran from the US Naval
19. CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan also ignored text messages from
Ken Hale, a Navy Veteran and former official with the US State Department,
from the home of George Webb Sweigert’s home in Maryland at that time.
20. CNN and CNN Reporter Donie O’Sullivan also ignored text messages
21. CNN made no acknowledgment of these death threat texts and message
made directly to George Webb Sweigert in its June 2020 reporting about
him.
22. CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan recklessly endangered the life of
George Webb Sweigert and his family by outrageously and falsely twisting the
death threats to him by reporting somehow George Webb Sweigert was wishing
victims of the CoronaVirus while in China for the 2019 NATO Military Games.
24. CNN repeatedly defamed George Webb Sweigert with false claims that
presented all the CoronaVirus victims from the October 2019 NATO Military
Games as victims including French Gold Medalist Elodie Cloudel and her fiancé
on the Dutch NATO Team. The Italian NATO Team victims were also
26. CNN rushed to incite a viral social media mob to further its anti-
Trump agenda and increase the billion-dollar bottom lines of its conglomerate
2020 from social media to its worldwide news platform without adhering to
ploy, CNN got the “Facts Last” as it repeatedly, recklessly, and willfully violated
30. CNN’s agenda-driven fiction about George Webb Sweigert about this
March 2020 reporting was not only false and defamatory, it created an
audience and unleashing that outrage on George Webb Sweigert with its
patently false accusations that George Webb Sweigert somehow wished harm on
31. CNN anchors and news personnel openly called for “acts of outrage”
against George Webb Sweigert, furthering the mob frothing to its false
narratives.
32. With its most recent reports in October of 2020, CNN’s wanton
reckless endangerment for the lives of George Webb Sweigert and his family.
33. Rather than publicly retracting its false, defaming reports about
George Webb Sweigert, CNN willfully chose to amplify this dangerous and
34. George Webb Sweigert was an easy target for CNN to advance its anti-
Trump agenda because he was a Bernie Sanders supporter who had turned to
Trump after his lawsuit against the DNC was mooted by a plea deal of a key
DNC operative.
false attacks, this action seeks compensatory damages in excess of Fifty Million
Dollars ($55,000,000.00).
37. In order to punish and to deter CNN from ever again engaging in false,
violation of well-
recognized journalistic standards and ethics, this action seeks punitive damages in
38. George Webb Sweigert met with two independent sources on June
14th, 2020 to confirm and cross-reference a story about missing uranium from
40. George Webb Sweigert was tracked and his cell phone was repeatedly
41. George Webb Sweigert had no idea the first informant he met with for
several hours, Marshall Okey Richards, was in fact an FBI Informant. Richards
played a key role in the entrapment of several residents of West Virginia and
42. The second informant George Webb Sweigert met with on June 14th,
43. CNN never reported a correction to their grossly misleading story that
George Webb Sweigert had somehow been the source of the information
himself, even after FBI Marshall Okey Richards was outed in the media.
44. CNN was informed numerous times in dozens of online broadcasts and
requests to correct their reporting that somehow George Webb Sweigert had
enforcement officer who was present as George Webb Sweigert took five calls
from DHS and Port of Charleston officials in trying to understand which DNC
45. Despite dozens of requests to correct the record, CNN and Reporter
Donie O’Sullivan callously refused to correct the story that an FBI Informant
was the actually source of the story, and that George Webb Sweigert had been
entrapped.
46. CNN has shown willful disregard for the truth by even the most minimal
journalist standard by allowing this false “Port of Charleston hoax”
narrative to continue.
47. Instead of trying to contain the irreparable harm their grossly
misleading story about the Port of Charleston, CNN and Reporter Donie
49. George Webb Sweigert was not aware of the Harvard CoronaVirus
Study placing the outbreak in Wuhan, China in August of 2019 at the time of
the reporting.
of 2019 and Detrick, Maryland area hospitals and nursing homes had a
Detrick Maryland.
doctor at the Ft. Belvoir facility that voluntary testing sometimes occurred both
athletes that could have been infected at Ft. Belvoir Community Hospital that
also attended the Wuhan NATO Military Games in October 2019 was just one
person, a Dutch National woman cyclist with a background as a driver for the
Dutch NATO driver was put on a whiteboard, and her employment at Ft.
speculated this Dutch NATO driver was a possible victim at this event, and
unknowingly been “patient zero”. During this time of intense tension between
the United States and China with each side blaming the other for the
CoronaVirus, this effort seemed to be the only logical and helpful discussion
occurring in the News universe to reduce the name calling and assignment of
blame.
solving and tracing the CoronaVirus crisis, CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan
chose to jump on the attack of Citizen Journalist, George Webb Sweigert yet
again. Even after evidence was produced that the Dutch courier was indeed
Dutch, had been a driver for the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, and was
indeed employed at Ft. Belvoir Community Hospital for CNN Reporter Donie
these gross errors of omission, CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan chose to
55. Even after the Chinese Foreign Minister specifically requested the
medical records of the Dutch cyclist with the NATO High Command experience,
CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan continue to push the false narrative their
was not evidence and no attempt at fair and balanced journalist by George
Webb Sweigert, causing yet more irreparable harm and defamation.
54. After dozens of outreaches to the subjects of the story, many of the
outreaches broadcast around the world, the subjects of the story remained only
correction for the previous 42 month, a reasonable person would expect some
errors. But the exact opposite behavior was demonstrated by CNN and
56. CNN not only unleashed a mob a revenge minded internet trolls to
lobbied the removal of his channel to deprive him any means of rebuttal against
journalistic work that included tens of thousands of source citations that would
had done to George Webb Sweigert’s career and life’s work, CNN and Reporter
Donie O’Sullivan actively conspired with internet trolls to intensify the damage
caused.
minute of this writing, and CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan show now signs
in a manner consistent with the values instilled upon him by his family and his
faith.
62. The CNN attacks on citizen journalism can be understood if one looks
at the money mad history of CNN and their continual choice over targeting
integrity. When view through the lens of false narratives leading to rapacious
citizen journalist who was just trying to tell the truth. But, what my not
surprise the Court by this point in the Complaint, CNN nor Donie O’Sullivan
have never to the date of the filing of this Complaint issued a formal retraction,
66. CNN is a foreign corporation existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware with its principal place of business being located at One CNN Center,
69. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to
28
U.S.C. § 1332(a).
70. CNN is the nation’s first cable news network and remains a fixture of
cable
distribution of its content through cable television and the Internet, and CNN
130. CNN published the broadcasts and online articles identified herein in
131. CNN has intentionally sought and obtained benefits from their tortious
District.
134. There is a reasonable and direct nexus between CNN’s tortious conduct
in
Michigan and the harm suffered by George Webb Sweigert in Michigan and beyond.
substantial part of the events giving rise to this claim occurred in this District,
138. CNN published to third parties without privilege no less than three (3)
false and defamatory television broadcasts, three (3) false and defamatory
Internet articles, and three (3) false and defamatory tweets of and concerning
139. As late as October 28th, 2020, CNN and Reporter Donie O’Sullivan
Sweigert.
141. The Tweets, Broadcasts, and Articles are collectively referred to herein as
the “False and Defamatory Accusations.”As the natural and foreseeable consequence
of its actions, CNN knew and intended that its False and Defamatory Accusations
would be republished by others, including media outlets and others on social media.
142. George Webb Sweigert has a right to Freedom of Speech and Freedom
143. George Webb Sweigert has always made a practice of fast and very
144. George Webb Sweigert does not take money for large corporate
advertisers looking for journalists who will look the other way to their
transgressions.
145. George Webb Sweigert does not promulgate conspiracy theories like
Donald Trump being the agent of Russia as CNN and Reporter Donie
O’Sullivan have done like clockwork that last four years.
146. George Webb Sweigert has a reasonable expectation to be protected by the
rights guaranteed by the US Constitution and relevant State Law.
CNN PUBLISHED NEGLIGENTLY AND
MALICIOUSLY
147. As one of the world’s leading news outlets, CNN knew but ignored the
148. Instead, CNN recklessly rushed to publish its False and Defamatory
Trump.
149. In doing so, CNN lifted the incident from social media and placed it in
the mainstream media, giving its False and Defamatory Accusations credibility
and permanence.
Code of Ethics.
truth and the publication of the False and Defamatory Accusations with actual
knowledge of falsity following its review of the complete video evidence and
152. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
publication.
153. CNN’s duty to investigate is heightened where, as here, where the June
154. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
credibility.
155. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
sources.
its pre-conceived false narrative against President Trump and his supporters.
159. In fact, upon information and belief, prior to publishing any of its False
and Defamatory Accusations, CNN knew that its defamations were the result of
FBI Informants planting false information with George Webb Sweigert. But
160. CNN continued to publish its False and Defamatory Accusations with
obvious sources who were present at the January 18 incident and would have
George Webb Sweigert, and upon information and belief, his wealth of video
162. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
163. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
164. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
165. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
166. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
by failing to examine the way in which its own biases and agenda shaped its
false reporting.
167. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
168. CNN negligently and recklessly published its False and Defamatory
by wrongfully placing the anti-Trump agenda over the harm its False and
169. Upon information and belief, at the time of its initial reporting of and
concerning George, CNN did not know George’ age and did not make any
170. CNN’s actual malice is further evidenced by its failure to retract is False
171. CNN published its False and Defamatory Accusations with common
because his was a disaffected support of the Democratic Party and consciously
ignored the threats of harm that it knew would inevitably ensue, in favor of its
political agenda.
172. CNN published its False and Defamatory Accusations with common
law malice, demonstrated by its failure to retract its False and Defamatory
Accusations despite the harm and danger it knew would be inflicted upon
173. CNN published its False and Defamatory Accusations with common
DAMAGES
175. The publication of the False and Defamatory Accusations directly and
Sweigert.
parties and members of the mainstream and social media mob, which was
reasonably foreseeable.
177. The False and Defamatory Accusations against George Webb Sweigert
are defamatory per se, as they are libelous on their face without resort to
additional facts, and as clearly demonstrated here, George Webb Sweigert was
reputation.
291. As a direct and proximate result of the False and Defamatory
distress.
Accusations George Webb Sweigert is forced to live his life in a constant state
293. CNN published its False and Defamatory Accusations with actual
malice and common law malice, thereby entitling George Webb Sweigert to an
294. CNN’s conduct was outrageous and willful, demonstrating that entire
(c) That George recover his reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses from
CNN;
(d) That all costs of this action be taxed to CNN; and
(e) That the Court grant all such other and further relief that the Court
deems just and proper, including equitable relief.
Respectfully submitted this 30th day of October, 2020.