Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Apparel Quality Management
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Apparel Quality Management
Quality
AND EFFECT Management
ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
Product: Exampie produot ' P re pa red by: , Gavin Robbins , Creatéd: 01/01/2008
, Key Date: . Milestone 1 , Modified: O3/03/2OO8
Anon Teom
Eh1EA Table
Item/Function Failure Rate Failure Mode Mode % Mode Failure Rate Local Effect
Next End Effect Severity Occurrence Cause(s) of Failure
Effect
Contamination
Machine
3ammed 30 20 L1etaI is not cut Marqinal Remote
Downtime
Lubrication Problem
Primary Slide
Bearing
119 Contamination
Machine
Cannot Freely Move Metal is not .Reasonably
Restricted 70 Downtime, Loss Marginal
cut or urooucc Probable
47
correctly
120 Lubrication Problem
124
Ino l is not cut
per
ativ
Contamination
e
Meta
Machine Marginal
Extremely
30 2
Downtime Unli' -'"
The Team then identi fi es all the ways the design or process
could fail, referred to as potenti al failure modes.
The 4 main types of process failure modes are too much, too
litt le, missing or wrong.
A traditi onal FMEA quanti fi es risk. This is done by calculati ng
the Risk Priority Number (RPN) derived from 3 subjecti ve
ratings – Severity(S), Occurrence(O) and Detection(D)
calculated by:
RPN = S x O x D Risk Priority
umbern=(RPN)
Step 2: Severity number (S
S*O*D
D-M- A-I-
M=Manufacturing. Includes the potential failures of O CODES
the components or manufacturing of standard details
that might be produced or machined in-house
KNITTING INDUSTRY
ABSTRACT
Material: Method
ERROR CODE ERROR NAME
HT 1 Number of Hole
Two fleece HT 2 Fly
fabric, single jersey and HT 3 Broken Needle
rib fabrics measured for HT 4 Lycra Eccentric
Identi fi cati on of Error Reasons: These errors are occur because of raw
materials, machinery, and human.
100
RPN
80
60
40
20
0 HT HT HT HT HT HT HT HT HT HT HT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
RPN 14 14 14 12 12 12 11 10 96 84 84
CONCLUSION