Stuvia 601752 Mac3702 Exam Solution Pack 2020 Mac3702
Stuvia 601752 Mac3702 Exam Solution Pack 2020 Mac3702
2020 - MAC3702
written by
accountingpal
On Stuvia you will find the most extensive lecture summaries written by your fellow students. Avoid
resits and get better grades with material written specifically for your studies.
www.stuvia.com
October/November 2017
May/June 2018
MAC3702 Application of financial
October/November 2018
management techniques
Recently telecommunications companies have injected billions of rands into South African soccer by the
way of competitions, buying existing clubs and using local stars as faces of their marketing campaigns. This
has presented MSL and its peers with exciting opportunities to grow their bottom line, hence the recent
decision by the MSL Board to introduce a new soccer boot design - EISH 7 inspired by the great soccer
legend, Einstein Shabalala. The following information was sourced from the integrated annual report of
MSL.
Rand
Equity and Liabilities
Ordinary shares (80 cents each) 500 000
Retained income 720 000
Shareholders’ capital and reserves 1 220 000
15% Preference shares (R100 each) 120 000
Long term loan – Tebha Bank (16,67%) 680 000
Total equity and liabilities 2 020 000
Additional information
1. The expected operating profit, excluding profits from the sale of EISH 7 soccer boots, for the year
ending 31 May 2017 is as follows:
R Probability
1 600 000 20%
1 700 000 30%
1 800 000 40%
2 000 000 10%
2. Ordinary share dividends declared and paid in the previous five (5) years were as follows:
3. The market price for ordinary shares is currently R12 per share and that of preference shares is R96
per share. New issues will have no effect on these prices, although ordinary share issue costs will
be 4% per share issued.
4. MSL aims to maintain a debt: equity ratio of 1: 1 going forward (based on book values).
5. To manufacture the new EISH 7 soccer boot, MSL is planning to buy a new machine for R800 000
on 1 June 2016. The company will use this machine for 5 years in full production, and then scrap it
at R50 000.
6. The expected annual production quantities of this new soccer boot for which demand exists are
given below:
Cost R
Direct material 465
Direct labour 200
Variable overhead 50
7. The budgeted cash fixed costs for the production of EISH 7 is R400 000 per annum and the selling
price is set at R800 per pair. No inflationary increases need to be considered.
8. The following options are available to finance the new initiative:
• New ordinary shares can be issued (retained earnings cannot be utilised).
• Up to 4 000 15% preference shares of R100 each can be issued.
• A loan from Sambo Bank of R200 000 at prime + 800 basis points.
• A top-up loan from Tebha Bank of R50 000 at the same rate as the existing loan, which is
considered to approximate the fair market interest rate.
The loans can only be taken at the total amounts as made available by the banks.
9. The South African Income Tax Act stipulates a company tax rate of 28% and a section 12C allowance
on new manufacturing machines of 20% per annum. The prime lending rate is currently 10,5% and
is expected to stay unchanged for the foreseeable future.
REQUIRED
(a) Calculate the expected retained income for the year ending 31 May 2017, assuming both ordinary
and preference dividends are paid and there is no other movement in capital employed (ignore
financial impact of EISH 7).
[Round decimals to nearest whole number] (10)
(b) Calculate the market values of ordinary share capital and preference share capital before taking the
new investment into account.
(4)
(c) Determine how the new manufacturing machine should be financed, considering the funding
options available to MSL as well as the current capital structure on 31 May 2016 using book values.
(Calculations 6 marks; comments 2 marks) (8)
(d) Calculate the weighted average cost of capital of MSL based on book values after the financing of
the new project.
[Round rand amounts to the nearest cent and other numbers to the nearest two decimal places]
(10)
(e) Advise the MSL Board whether or not the new machine should be purchased, assuming a hurdle
rate of 19%. You can assume tax is payable in the same year as calculated and accrued.
[Round answers to the nearest rand] (13)
(f) Determine how long (in years) it will take MSL to recover its initial capital investment in the new
machine, using the discounted payback method. (5)
(g) List five (5) qualitative factors that should be taken into account by the Board of MSL before deciding
to buy the new machine. (5)
[55]
MAC3702
MAY/JUNE 2017
SUGGESTED SOLUTION
QUESTION 1
Dividends
- Ordinary
(625 000 x 1.05 x 1.10) (721 875)
- Prefs – Dividend
(120 000 x 0.15) (18 000)
PART C
Financing the new manufacturing machine:
The new manufacturing machine must be financed through a fresh issue of ordinary shares (R190 000);
issue of preference shares (R360 000); top-up of the Tebha Bank loan (R50 000) and a loan from Sambo
Bank of R200 000.
Notes
Target capital structure (50: 50) – R1 410 000 debt and R1 410 000 equity. Long-term loans are utilized
first because of the tax break (cheaper than preference shares, therefore reducing WACC)
Max: 8 marks
PART D
Weighted average cost of capital (after purchase of new machine)
Ordinary shares
𝐷1
𝐾 = +g
𝑒 𝑃0−𝑓
𝐾 𝑐
=
+ 0,10
1,16
𝑒 12−0,48
Ke = 20,07%
Preference shares
𝐷1
𝐾 =
𝑝 𝑃0
15
𝐾 =
𝑝 96
Kp = 15,63%
(e)
(8000 x 30%) + (12000 x 40%) + (15000 x 20%) + (18000 x 10%) = 12 000 units
Investment appraisal
0 1-4 5
Cost price (800 000)
Residual value 50 000
Working Capital - -
Net Cash Flow 620 000 620 000
Taxation _________ (128 800) (142 800)
(800 000) 491 200 527 200
Taxation 1–4 5
Recoupment 50 000
- Selling Price 50 000
- Tax Base -
(f)
(g)
• Will training be required.
• Reliability of estimates.
• Identification of buyer in 5 years.
• Change in technology.
• Available funding.
• Impact of funding on financial risk.
• Sustainability of demand.
• Change in costs.
Madlala (Pty) Ltd (“Madlala”) is one of South Africa’s leading gaming retailers and has an amazing range
of video games, consoles and accessories. With the opening of its first megastore at the Gateway Shopping
mall in December 2016, Madlala’s business now consists of six stores in four different provinces. The
company operates from leased premises and its investment in non-current assets includes intangible
assets, equipment and fittings. Lease restrictions have often hindered the company from creating a ‘fun
& play’ environment at its stores. Madlala (Pty) Ltd is currently not listed in any stock exchange.
Madlala is still enjoying the benefits of the successful launch of Playstation®4. However, recently the rand
has come under severe pressure against major world currencies and the management team is looking at
ways to protect the company against currency fluctuations. The company is also faced with the challenge
of a decrease in buying power of consumers, especially following rapid hikes in the lending rates.
The financial information for Madlala (Pty) Ltd for the past two financial periods is shown below.
2017 2016
R R
2017 2016
R R
ASSETS
Non-current assets 1 030 000 980 000
Current assets Total 2 180 000 1 863 000
assets 3 210 000 2 843 000
Business valuation
For the year ended 30 April 2017 the company recorded a net profit of R424 000 and free cash flows of
R258 267. The free cash flows for the 2016 financial year amounted to R240 603 and the increase in cash
flows is in line with expected future growth of the business. The company’s patents and distribution rights
though valued at R3 560 000 (net of tax) are currently recorded in the statement of financial position at
R506 000. Should the board of directors of Madlala decide to wind up the company, administration costs
are expected to be R160 000.
Additional information
• Weighted average cost of capital is 15%.
• Similar companies listed on AltX of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange have an average P/E ratio
of 11 times and earnings yield of 9,09%.
• Companies not listed on any stock exchange are estimated to trade at 8% below their fair
market values (marketability discount).
• The current applicable tax rate is 28%.
REQUIRED
(a) Calculate the profitability ratios of Madlala (Pty) Ltd for the year ended 30 April 2017 and
where possible, provide reasons for changes from the previous financial year.
The following ratios are required:
i). Turnover growth (calculation 1 mark; comment 2 marks)
ii). Gross profit margin (calculation 2 marks; comment 1 mark)
iii). Effective tax rate (calculation 2 marks; comment 1 mark)
iv). EBITDA margin (calculation 2 marks; comment 1 mark)
v). Marketing expenses as % of revenue (calculation 1 mark; comment 1 mark)
vi). Net interest cover (calculation 3 marks; comment 1 mark)
vii). Dividend cover (calculation 2 marks; comment 1 mark)
(b) Advise the management team of Madlala (Pty) Ltd which option they should choose as their
credit management policy. Show all supporting calculations. (12)
(c) Determine how much the owners of Madlala (Pty) Ltd should sell their shares to an independent
investor that is interested in buying 25% of the business. Use the price- earnings multiple
method. (6)
(d) Calculate the total value of Madlala (Pty) Ltd using the net asset value method, if the decision
is to wind up the company. (4)
(e) Calculate the total value of Madlala (Pty) Ltd using the free cash flow method. (2)
[45]
QUESTION - MADLALA
2 400 000
i) Turnover growth = 2 180 000
−1
= 10.09%
≈ 10.1%
• Minor sales price increases would also contribute to the nominal growth rate
(which exceeds with inflation).
2017 2016
1 310 000 1 200 000
2 400 000 2 180 000
54.6% 55.0%
Slight drop in GP, possibly as a result of higher input costs caused by the weakening rand.
2017 2016
191 000 162 000
615 000 557 000
= 31.06% = 29.08%
≈ 31.1% ≈ 29.1%
32% 32.3%
The slight decrease was caused by the drop in GP% and a slight increase in expenses.
iii)
Dividend Cover 2017 2016
424 000 395 000
128 000 107 000
Profits increased by 7.3%, where dividends increased by 19.6%, thereby causing the coverage
to deteriorate.
(b)
(c)
Adjusted PE multiple
Adjusted PE 8
(d)
FCF1
Po =
WACC−g
258267 × 1.0734
=
0.15 − 0.0734
= 3 619 110
258 267
g= −1
240 603
= 7.34%
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Bophelo of the Cross Limited (“Bophelo”) is a global supplier and manufacturer of branded and generic
pharmaceutical products as well as infant nutritionals and consumer healthcare products. Bophelo is
the second largest pharmaceutical group listed on the JSE and boasts of 10 manufacturing facilities on
five continents with a staff compliment of 40 000 people worldwide.
Bophelo’s research and development team has just successfully completed the testing of its new
antiretroviral (ARV) drug with improved safety profile, which can be used in smaller quantities and, as
a consequence, will result in fewer side effects. Although this is Bophelo’s initial entry to the ARV drug
market, the government being pressured by lobby groups has finally granted the group a license to
manufacture and sell this drug. The license is valid from 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2024.
Bophelo is highly geared and the group treasurer is concerned about how this new business
undertaking should be financed. The group requires R210 million to set up the ARV drug plant and
have it ready to start the manufacturing process at the beginning of the calendar year (2018). An
extract from the latest statement of financial position of Bophelo of the Cross Limited is provided
below:
Notes:
1. 25% of ordinary shares were initially issued at R4 each and the remaining 75% was issued just four
years ago at R24 each. All these shares are now trading at R72,50 each. Retained earnings are
not available to finance the new asset. The recent dividend per share paid was R2,10. The market
return averages 15,25% and the market risk premium is estimated at 8,12% (beta is 0,9).
2. The preference shares will be redeemed in four years’ time at R2 per share. The group currently
pays a fixed cumulative dividend of R132 million. Similar shares yield approximately about 9,50%
in the market.
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
3. The five-year term loan was issued at a post-tax interest rate of 8,10% three years ago. Interest
is paid annually while the capital is repaid at the end of the term. The going interest rate on loans
of this nature (before tax) is 10,25%.
4. Four million debentures were issued three years ago at a post-tax rate of 8,46%. These are
currently trading at R500 each.
The group’s manufacturing site will be modified to accommodate the ARV drug machinery. An existing
machine will have to be disposed of at its tax value of R5 million at the start of 2018. This machine
was expected to generate after tax cash profits of R3,8 million per annum for the next two years. The
group is expected to pay site rehabilitation costs upfront of R15 million as the result of the new plant.
It has been estimated that the actual rehabilitation costs at the end of the project will be two-thirds
of the initial amount.
The plant will be depreciated in line with the group policy of 12,5% per annum and will be scrapped
for R35 million at the end of 2024. The group has budgeted cash sales of R84 million in 2018. The
Department of Health is embarking on an aggressive awareness campaign to curb the spread of
chronic diseases and as a result the sales value will shrink by 2% year on year. Bophelo maintains a
profit mark-up of 180% on cost. Additional site maintenance costs of R10 million per annum for the
first three years will be incurred and paid at the end of each year.
South African Revenue Services (SARS) allows capital allowance on similar plants over six years. The
group is required to pay any shortfall on rehabilitation costs (and is entitled to a refund in the event
the costs are less than the initial estimate). Rehabilitation costs are not deductible for income tax
purposes.
Funding options
The group treasury team has approached two major South African banks and they have each indicated
the willingness to finance the new plant. The following terms have been offered:
The bank will disburse R210 million to Bophelo to facilitate the purchase of the ARV drug plant. This
is a seven-year facility with the capital portion only repayable at the end of the loan term. The interest
will be paid annually in arrears at a fixed rate of 10,25%. The group will incur a service fee of R250 000
payable at the start of each year for the duration of the term.
Meditec Bank
Meditec Bank has offered to grant Bophelo the full R210 million as a loan at an annual interest rate of
10,25%. An upfront administration cost of R2 million is payable at the start of the loan term. The
capital portion of the loan will be repaid in five equal annual instalments at the end of each year. The
interest will be charged on outstanding balance and will be payable annually in arrears.
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
REQUIRED:
a) Calculate the weighted average cost of capital of Bophelo of the Cross Limited.
[Round rand amounts to the nearest rand and all other numbers to the nearest three decimals]
(19)
[Round all numbers to the nearest two decimals. Workings should be rounded to the nearest R’m]
(12)
c) Advise the group treasurer whether the group should invest in the new ARV drug plant based on
part b) above, and provide qualitative factors (excluding those relating to the machine specifically)
they should consider before investing.
(5)
d) Given the two available loan facilities and assuming that the group has decided to go ahead with
the investment in the ARV drug plant, advise the group treasurer based on the net present cost
which bank loan should be preferred.
[Round all numbers to the nearest two decimals. Working should be rounded to the nearest R’m]
(14)
(50)
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
QUESTION
= 16m x R72.50
𝑥 = 16m Shares
= 14.438%
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
i = 9.5
n = 4
= 64 800 000
i = 10.25 x 0.72
= 7.38
n =2
𝑲𝒅 𝑰(𝟏 − 𝑻)
=
𝑷𝒐
37.0125
=
500
= 7.4%
(b)
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
Rmillions 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Net Cash Flow 44.00 42.92 41.86 50.82 49.81 48.81 47.84
Gross Profit - New plant 54.00 52.92 51.86 50.82 49.81 48.81 47.84
Site maintenance (10.00) (10.00) (10.00) - - - -
NPV @ CF CF CF CF CF CF CF CF
Taxation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Net cash flow 44.00 42.92 41.86 50.82 49.81 48.81 47.84
Wear and Tear (35.00) (35.00) (35.00) (35.00) (35.00) (35.00)
Recoupment 35.00
Selling price 35.00
Tax base -
9.00 7.92 6.86 15.82 14.81 13.81 82.84
Profit
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
(c) The Investment should be rejected on the basis of the negative NPV
Other factors
• The Increasing costs of health care and the effect on the sustainability of the project
• What happens after 2024 when the licence expires
• Legal matters with respect negative effects of drugs
• The funding of the project
• The certainty of cash flows. How sure are we that the asset will sell for R35m in 5 years’
time?
• Is the mark-up on cost not unreasonable?
(d)
Loan 210.00
Capital repayment (210.00)
Interest payment (22.00) (22.00)
Service fees (0.25) (0.25)
Taxation 1-6 7
INTEREST
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
MEDITEC 0 1 2 3 4 5
Loan 210.00
Admin fees (2.00)
Capital repayments (42.00) (42.00) (42.00) (42.00) (42.00)
Interest Payments (22) (17) (13) (9) (4)
Tax benefit on admin fees 0.56
Tax benefit on interest 6 5 4 2 1
208 (57) (54) (51) (48) (45)
Effective after- tax cost CF CF CF CF CF CF
C0MPUTE IRR = 7.52%
INTEREST 1 2 3 4 5
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Multiple Choice Limited (“Multiple Choice”) is a JSE-listed video entertainment and internet company
with a strong presence in South Africa and across the African continent This leading multi-channel
pay-tv operator was founded in 1985 and has since then grown in leaps and bounds to become one
of South Africa’s favourite brands with more than five million subscribing South African households.
In addition to its digital satellite TV service, Multiple Choice is also South Africa’s largest internet
service provider. However, the company has been coming under a lot of pressure from the
government as it continues to lag behind on its economic transformation targets. Its recent public
spat with the government officials has put the company under immense pressure from its
shareholders to prioritise the transformation agenda.
Mvelaphansi Media (Pty) Limited (“Mvela”), a well-established 100% black owned and managed
private company was founded in 2007 by the former Minister of Communications Thoko Segoale.
Since its formation, Mvela has obtained Key contracts from provincial and local government
departments throughout the country with much higher margins than from its private sector clientele
(only 20% of Mvela’s business is generated from the private sector). In an effort to diversify its
business and alleviate the company from its financial woes following the liquidation of one of its
associates, Mvela’s managing director Judas Segoale has approached the Multiple choice board of
directors with an intention of buying 26% of Multiple Choice.
Mvela operates on cash-only basis and its abridged statement of profit and loss for the year ended 30
June 2017 is provided below. The profit for the year is after taking into account a once-off special tax
concession of R125 million received from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration. The directors of Mvela
are confident that the company will maintain its current income and expenses. Mvela business has a
required rate of return of 13%.
R’m
Turnover 23 452
Cost of Sales (13 485)
Gross Profit 9 967
Operating expenses (5 588)
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation 4 379
Depreciation and amortisation (394)
Earnings before interest and tax 3 985
Interest expense (620)
Profit before tax 3 365
Tax (875)
Profit for the year 2 490
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
Multiple Choice has arranged a structure where by the existing shareholders of Multiple Choice will
sell 25% of their shareholding to Mvela. The market has speculated a great economic windfall for
Multiple Choice after this deal, as the South African Football Association (SAFA) is most likely to
partner with the Mvela sport channel division to broadcast SAFA’s football matches. The industry
average earnings yield remains at about 9,09% (Mvelaphansi media is also benchmarked against this
industry average). However, the deterioration of South Africa’s currency over the past year, coupled
with rising competition for content has increased the cost base of Multiple Choice.
Despite the trying economic conditions, Multiple Choice has managed to increase its customer base
by 6% mainly as a result of its flagship personal video recorder, the Dish Explorer that continues to be
a key differentiator in the market. Cost pressures from expanding the customer base, investment in
new technologies and international USA dollar-based content costs continue to hamper the
company’s efforts to contain its operating costs.
Due to recent sharp increase in the share price of Multiple Choice (directly at the back of the pending
deal), its board of directors unanimously agreed on the following terms of sale:
• The price per share will be the average share price for the second half of the 2017 financial
year of Multiple Choice Limited.
• A discount equivalent to the percentage decrease (from 2016 to 2017 financial year) in foreign
exchange losses account of Multiple Choice will be granted to Mvela
• Deal structuring costs of R4 million will be paid by Mvela for corporate advisory services.
Summarised financial statements of Multiple Choice for the past two financial years are presented
below:
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
REQUIRED:
a) Using closing balances and book values where applicable, calculate the 2016 and 2017 financial
year ratios of Multiple Choice Limited, and provide possible reasons for any movement
i) Dividend yield
ii) Earnings yield
iii) Return on assets
iv) Cash ratio
v) Gross profit margin
vi) Debt ratio
vii) Effective interest rate
b) Calculate the existing capital structure of Multiple Choice Limited and comment on how the
business is financed.
c) Using the Price/Earnings multiple method, establish the value of Mvelaphansi Media (Pty) Limited
as at 30 June 2017.
(8)
d) Perform a reasonableness check on part c) above by establishing the value of Mvelaphansi Media
(Pty) Limited at 30 June 2017 using the discounted cash flow method.
(4)
e) Determine how much it would cost Mvelaphansi Media (Pty) Limited to acquire the required stake
in Multiple Choice Limited.
(5)
f) Identify and discuss the risks that Multiple Choice is exposed to. (5)
[50]
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
MAC3702
QUESTION 1
i)
2017 2016
3.18% 3.42%
5.91 5.64
The Dividend Yield has decreased. Although the Dividend per share has increased by 4.8%, the
Share Price has increased by 12.9%. This also is a result of the increase in the number of shares.
ii)
2017 2016
9.55% 10.27%
17.76 16.93
Earnings Yield has decreased. The EPS has increased by a smaller extent that the Share Price.
This was caused by the increase in the number of shares.
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
iii)
2017 2016
39.56% 41.79%
This is an indication of the efficient use of Assets. This is mainly due to large increases in Cash
Balances and other Current Assets.
iv)
2017 2016
0.16 : 1 0.09 : 1
Cash Ratio has improved. This is as a result of the almost doubling in Cash and Cash Equivalents.
v)
2017 2016
46.3% 47.3%
16 517 14 934
The GP% has decreased slightly. Possibly price increases could not be passed on to customers in
the short-term.
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
vi)
2017 2016
19.91% 21.63%
The Debt Ratio has declined, meaning that more of the Assets have been funded with Equity.
vii)
2017 2016
11.64% 9.71%
Effective rates have increased, an indication of increased risks and causing high interest rate
charges.
14 599 100%
The company has a Debt to Equity Ratio of 45 : 55. More equity funding.
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
c) Adjusted PE Multiple
PE = 1⁄9.09%
= 11
Earnings
2 365
Value = PE x Earnings
= 7 x 2 365
= R16 555
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
FCF 3 205
Po = = = 24 654
WACC − g 0.13
e)
R62 543,52
R60 884,80
Deal structuring (4 000,00)
Price payable 56 884,80
f)
Risks
MAC3702
OCTOBER 2017
Downloaded by: sphendulwe1 | [email protected]
Distribution of this document is illegal
Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
Pick 2 Save Group (trading as “P2S”) is one of the major supermarkets listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
and it boasts of more than 1 800 chain stores in five Southern African countries. Following the restructuring of
its business at the beginning of the current year, P2S has managed to reduce its workforce, and the company is
hopeful that in future this will result in improved trading profit margins. During the current year, P2S launched a
loyalty programme throughout its stores, and this has led to a significant increase in the number of customers.
Due to extreme heat conditions, particularly in the Western Cape, P2S has seen a sharp increase in its cost of
sales as the suppliers are pushing the costs onto the retailers. The retail sector in Southern Africa remains highly
competitive, and businesses always have to come up with innovative ways to stay ahead of the game. Despite
tough economic conditions anticipated, P2S continues to increase its retail footprint throughout the country.
Recently, the executive committee (“EXCO”) of P2S has approached you to evaluate the feasibility of constructing
additional stores (hypermarkets) for the company. There are three cities currently envisaged, namely Polokwane,
Nelson Mandela Bay and Mbombela. You have already furnished the EXCO with the following findings on
Polokwane and Nelson Mandela Bay:
The total sales in the first two years of operation will amount to R70 million (per annum). P2S will maintain the
group’s current trading profit margin as shown in the financial statements below. The sales will thereafter grow
at inflation + 60 basis points yearly (the future growth in profits is in line with the expected sales growth). Once in
operation P2S will donate a total sum of MT3,3 million (Mozambican Meticais) to charity organisations based in
Maputo.
The payment will be made in three equal annual instalments at the end of each financial year. The donations do
not form part of the company’s trading activities and are not tax deductible. The Mbombela project will require
working capital of R2 million, only for the year of construction. These funds will be reimbursed by P2S head office
at the end of the construction phase. The last year of evaluating the project is April 2023, when the continuing
value of the project will have to be established. P2S will use its current year’s effective tax rate to determine the
tax receivable or payable on the Mbombela project.
2018 2017
Rm Rm
Sale of merchandise 130 028 113 694
Cost of sales (102 792) (90 180)
Gross profit 27 236 23 514
Other operating income 3 711 3 428
Salaries and wages (9 499) (8 507)
Other operating expenses (12 145) (10 374)
Trading profit before depreciation and amortisation 9 303 8 061
Depreciation and amortisation (2 025) (1 733)
Trading profit 7 278 6 328
Foreign exchange and other losses (109) (147)
Interest received 174 216
Finance costs (498) (415)
Profit before income tax 6 845 5 982
Income tax expense (1 998) (1 848)
Net profit for the year 4 847 4 134
Additional information:
2018 2017
Earnings per share (cents) 969,40 826,80
Dividend per share (cents) 387,76 344,50
Market capitalisation (Rm) 80 125 82 600
Number of stores 1 855 1 803
Number of employees 180 076 181 622
2018 2017
Rm Rm
Additional information:
• The company has a target capital structure of 3: 0,5: 1 (Ordinary share capital: Preference share capital:
Corporate bonds). The cost of corporate bonds is JIBAR+2,05% and the cost of preference shares is 80% of
the prime lending rate. The target cost of equity is 12,212%.
• For evaluating the projects, the cash flows take place at the end of the financial year, unless stated
otherwise.
Indicator 30 April
2018
Inflation rate - CPI (%) 5,25
Prime lending rate (%) 10,25
JIBAR (%) 7,00
Corporate tax rate (%) 28
• For the next five years, one South African Rand (R1) is forecasted to trade against the Mozambican Metical
as follows:
REQUIRED
a) Describe two types of projects that are dealt with in capital budgeting and provide a business example
for each type.
(4)
b) Advise the executive committee of P2S whether it should accept any of the construction projects above,
using the capital budgeting techniques as per the company’s strategic guidelines.
(Calculations 16 marks; Comments 2 marks)
(18)
c) Considering the funding facilities currently used by P2S, discuss factors that the executive committee of
P2S will have to consider before deciding on the best financing option to fund its construction project/s.
(8)
d) Calculate the following ratios for the 2017 and 2018 financial years, using closing balances and book
values where applicable. Provide reasons for movements in the calculated ratios:
[Round the final answer to one decimal place. No marks will be awarded for simply stating whether there
was an increase or a decrease]
a. Dividend cover
b. P/E ratio
c. Average employee cost to company
d. Return on capital employed
e. Cash ratio
(Calculations 15 marks; Comments 5 marks)
(20)
[50]
QUESTION 1
a) Independent projects: These are projects that are evaluated independent of each other, in other
words, they are not compared to one another. It is possible that both projects can be accepted if
the relevant criteria are met.
Example: Two vehicles are being evaluated for purchase, a courtesy bus for transporting staff and
a delivery truck. Clearly the purpose of both these vehicles are different and will not be compared
to one another.
Mutually exclusive projects: These are projects that will serve the same purpose and only one of
these can be selected.
Example: Two delivery trucks are being evaluated but only one is required
b) Investment appraisal
0 1 2 3 4 5
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Net cash profits 4 817 900 4 817 900 5 047 097 5 289 702
Taxation (1 143 635) (1 143 635) (1 210 538) (1 281 354)
Donation (244 173) (222 222) (212 314) -
(47 000 000) 2 000 000 3 430 092 3 452 043 3 624 245 4 008 348
Terminal value 91 243 793
(47 000 000) 2 000 000 3 430 092 3 452 043 3 624 245 95 252 141
CF CF CF CF CF CF
NPV @ 10.5% R20 426 615
𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵 + 𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰
𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵𝑵 =
𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰𝑰
= 1,45
2 3 4 5
2020 2021 2022 2023
Net profit and taxation
Growth (1.0585) (1.0585)
Sales 70 000 000 70 000 000 74 095 000 78 429 558
Trading profit 3 917 900 3 917 900 4 147 097 4 389 702
Effective rate
(1998/6845) 29.19% 29.19% 29.19% 29.19%
Taxation on trading
profit 1 143 635 1 143 635 1 120 538 1 281 354
7 278
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 = = 5.597%
130 028
1 998
𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 = = 29.19%
6 845
Donation
= 6,52%
c)
Consider the current Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) against the target.
Management should consider the capacity available to raise either debt or equity to stay
within the range of the target WACC.
Cost of various funding options must be considered when raising new funds, as these may not
be issued at the same coupon rates.
Consider the movement in yield curves, these will affect market values.
Consideration of additional financial risk and its impact on WACC.
The shareholders perception of the additional risk and their required rate of return.
Consider reducing dividends to fund capital projects.
Management should utilise the cheapest form of funding.
If new equity is issued, its impact on WACC must be considered.
d) Dividend Cover
2018 2017
969,40 826,80
387,76 344,50
Price
P.E. Ratio =
Earnings
2018 2017
80 125 82 600
4 847 4 134
10
2018 2017
Capital Employed
- Equity 21 403 19 160
- Preference shares 1 364 1 167
- Corporate Business 5 022 4 872
27 789 25 199
2018 2017
0,43 : 1 0,50 : 1
• This ratio has worsened. Previously 50% of current liabilities could be covered by cash and
cash equivalents. This is down to 43%, increasing liquidity risk.
• The cash resources have declined while current liabilities have increased.
High 5 Corporation (“High 5”) owns and operates retail stores that provide electronic audio-visual products and
appliances. The company has cemented its position in this market as a national chain focused on six main
categories: Television, audio products, appliances, computing, cellular and car audio. High 5 has strategically
positioned itself to save the consumer money mainly through sourcing the bulk of its products from major
electronics companies in Asia. In the past years, High 5 has been ranked ahead of its peers when it comes to the
quality of in-store and after-sales service. The surge of Asian immigrants who specialise in technology, with strong
business links to electronics companies around the world, has posed a serious threat to the business. The South
African consumers have not felt a severe impact of the depreciating Rand due to lending rates having remained
moderately low over the past few months. The credit terms offered by the company has also guaranteed that
consumers are able to meet their credit obligation, and as a result, the bad debt expense is negligible. High 5
grants its credit customers two (2) months to settle their accounts, and failure to comply with this credit policy
leads to penalty fees and interest charged to the customer account. Cash sales make one-fifth of total sales.
The company enters into CIF agreements (Cost, Insurance & Freight) with its suppliers, where the latter would be
responsible for all the costs incurred in the shipping of the merchandise to the Durban harbour (port of
destination). High 5 then uses its own transport fleet to move the inventory to the company’s depots situated in
Durban, Pretoria and Mangaung (carriage costs). High 5’s working capital policy is to pay its foreign suppliers
within a month from the time the merchandise is loaded on board the ship in the country of export. This is also
the average time that the suppliers expect to be paid. Local suppliers are seldom used and purchase costs from
these are negligible.
Owing to high value goods sold, among other things, High 5 immediately distributes most of its merchandise
directly to its stores in different metros and maintains low inventory levels at its depots. The sustainable success
of High 5 is predicated on its ability to manage its inventory levels through its robust inventory management
system, Fastel®. The company expects inventory to be on its shelves for a maximum of 20 days. Since the
introduction of the system, the company’s inventory turnover has significantly reduced the risk of obsolescence.
The management team is also evaluating its working capital strategy, especially around debtors and inventory
management, in an effort to bolster the company’s profitability. The plan is to reduce the average inventory
levels by 12,5%, leading to low inventory holding costs. Loss of profits due to stock- outs is expected to be R26
148. The company will reduce its number of weekly trips between its depots and the harbour, leading to a 10%
decrease in carriage costs. This saving relates to wages for the drivers who will be transferred to the packing
department. The low inventory levels will ensure that High 5 offers its customers the latest technology in the
market and this will lead to an increase in profits of R201 345 and increase in trade debtors of R244 000. Bad
debt expense ratio (based on current credit sales) is expected to be 0,28%.
The financial controller has extracted the following accounts from the company’s accounting system at 30 April
2018 (the company’s financial year-end):
Sales 77 650
Interest income 1 010
Dividend income 2 342
Purchases 38 242
Carriage costs 1 208
Product marketing costs 1 777
Salaries & wages 8 773
Other operating costs 10 546
Property, plant & equipment 72 240
Investments 8 892
Cash and cash equivalents 4 608
Trade receivables 11 376
Income tax receivables 1 844
Accrued income 457
Inventory 01.05.2017 3 176
Inventory 30.04.2018 3 037
Ordinary share capital (64 cents each) 1 8 000
Share premium 1 2 000
Retained income 01.05.2017 26 313
Preference share capital (R2 each) 3 5 000
Dividends paid 2 9 175
Term loan - ENK 4 16 821
8,75% Debentures 5 22 000
Deferred tax 6 259
Trade payables 5 273
Accrued expense 1 727
Bank overdraft 956
Notes:
1. The company has a beta of 1,15 and the market risk premium is 6,5%. The yield on RSA bonds, considered
market risk-free, is 8,2%. Since the inception of High 5, there has been no movement in the share capital
of the company. The ordinary shares were initially issued at 80 cents each and are now trading at 800
cents on the JSE’s AltX.
2. During the year, the company declared and paid a dividend of 70 cents per ordinary share and 17 cents
per preference share.
3. These irredeemable preference shares were issued five years ago, and are currently trading at 200 basis
points below the prime lending rate.
4. The term loan of R16,821 million received from Eerste Nasionale Korporasie (ENK) bears a fixed annual interest
of R1,5 million. The loan will be repaid on 25 April 2023, however, High 5 will pay a standard administration fee
of R500 000 on 25 April 2021. Borrowing the same amount of money under similar terms today would cost
High 5 an annual interest of R1,68 million.
5. The market value of the 8,75% debentures on 30 April 2018 was R20,25 million. The debentures were issued on
1 May 2015 and will be redeemed at a premium of 1% on 30 April 2023. There are no tax implications on the
premium amount.
Additional information:
REQUIRED
a) Calculate the weighted average cost of capital of High 5 Corporation at 30 April 2018.
b) Determine the cash conversion cycle of High 5 Corporation, and for each component: i).
Provide possible reasons for any deviations from the company policy, and
ii). Advise the management team on how it can be improved.
c) Advise the management team of High 5 Corporation whether to implement the new working capital
strategy. Show all supporting calculations.
(7)
d) Describe the key business risks that High 5 Corporation faces and advise the management on how each
risk can be mitigated.
(5)
[50]
SOLUTION
WACC
= 12 500 000 x R8
No. of shares
Cost of Equity
Ke = Rf + β (Rm − Rf)
= 15,675% ≈ 15,68%
Po = Do�Kp Kp = 10,25% - 2%
0,17 = 8,25%
= 8,25%
= R5 150 000
Long-Term Loan
= 10%
FV = 16 821 000 n =3
PV = 16 286 281
Debentures
= 22 220 000
n =5
= 1 386 000
i = 8,48%
≈ 8,5%
= R62 120
• Cost of Sales
Purchases 38 242
Carriage 1 208
= 28 days
= 66,8 days
= 50,3 days
• This seems to be completely contradictory to the 30 days terms as indicated. Possibly late shipment would
also delay payments.
• If this strategy works without compromising supply and relationships, then continue.
Actual Policy
Inventory days 28 days 20 days
Receivable days 66,8 days 60 days
Payables days (50,3 days) (30 days)
44,5 days 50 days
• Because of the delays in paying creditors, the working capital cycle is slightly better than the current policy.
RISKS MITIGATION
1 Currently only sources stock in Asia Start sourcing alternative suppliers
2 Asian immigrants’ new competitors Start sourcing new brands to give
customers alternatives
3 High level of bad debts Tighter measures required
4 Credit sales% to high Allow discounts for cash sales
5 Weakening Rand Use hedging techniques to reduce risk
6 Risk of obsolescence Regular sales to get rid of old stock
MAC 3702
SUGGESTED SOLUTION
OCTOBER 2018 EXAM
a) When funding new projects, it is essential to consider the target debt equity ratio as this will
determine the capacity of the company to raise a particular form of funding without drastically
altering its capital structure and weighted average cost of capital.
Also note that when a company issues non-redeemable preference shares it can serve as equity
when analysing the capital structure.
Note that SA Clinic is a private company and does not have a tradeable market price.
PROPOSAL 1
Current
capital Target capital
structure structure Capacity
Book value
Equity 14 240 000 (1) 25 410 000 (3) 11 170 000
Debentures 3 560 000 (2) 10 890 000 (4) 7 330 000
17 800 000 36 300 000 18 500 000
New R12 500 000 x
project 18 500 000 1.48
36 300 000
No of ordinary
shares to be issues
Total value 11 170 000
Net price ÷ R3,86 (R4.05 – 4.78%)
2 893 782
Shares
No of debentures
Total value 7 330 000
Nominal value R70,00
104 714
Debentures
PROPOSAL
No of Preference
shares to issued
Total value 11 170 000
Nominal value ÷ R100,00
111 700
preference
shares
No of debentures
Total value 7 330 000
Nominal value R70,00
104 714
Debentures
Cost of equity: In order to calculate the cost of equity we need the current market price. Since the
company is not listed, this information is unavailable. The R4,05 given in the question is not an
indication of fair value as this is a private company and the issue price could have been agreed upon
by the shareholders to raise the funds.
I have therefore used the current issue price of R3,25 as per the statement of financial position
Growth: The question states that growth will double going forward, therefore 3.5% x 2 = 7%.
𝐷1
𝐾𝑒 = +𝑔
𝑃0
0.15 𝑥 1.07
𝐾𝑒 = + 0.07
𝑅3.25
𝐾𝑒 = 11.94%
1 2 3 4
2019 2020 2021 2022
Capital repayment (3 560 000)
Premium (1) (11 392)
Interest paid (300 000) (300 000) (300 000) (300 000)
Tax benefit on interest (2) 84 000 84 000 84 000 84 000
Tax benefit on premium (3) 3 190
(216 000) (216 000) (224 202) (3 776 000)
𝑃𝑉 @ 8.64%: − 216000𝑐𝑓, −216000𝑐𝑓, −224202𝑐𝑓, −3776000𝑐𝑓, 8.64𝑖 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝 𝑁𝑃𝑉
𝑵𝑷𝑽 = 𝑹𝟑 𝟐𝟔𝟕 𝟑𝟑𝟎
𝑲𝒅 = 𝟏𝟐% 𝒙 𝟎. 𝟕𝟐 = 𝟖. 𝟔𝟒%
e) Ratio analysis
470
− 1 = −11.32%
530
No available information with respect this line item. Management needs to identify reasons for
the decrease. Given that this is a clinic, it may relate to sales of over-the-counter medication and
supplies.
EBITDA margin
𝑬𝑩𝑰𝑻𝑫𝑨
=
𝑹𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒖𝒆
2018 2017
1640 + 560(𝑑𝑒𝑝) 1380 + 420(𝑑𝑒𝑝)
= =
6600 5500
= 33.33% = 32.73%
2018 2017
334 307
= =
1260 1060
= 26.51% = 28.96%
𝑬𝑩𝑰𝑻
=
𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒑𝒂𝒊𝒅
NB: Interest received generally not a sustainable income item. Sometimes solutions net-off
the interest. This ratio is about financial risk and the ability to meet interest payments. I
therefore recommend not to net-off the interest received against the interest paid
2018 2017
1640 1380
= =
420 340
= 3.9 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 = 4.06 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠
• Interest costs have increased for no logical reason as the non-current debt is the same as
2017 and the short-term borrowings have decreased.
• Notwithstanding this, EBIT has increased by R260 000 while the interest only by R40 000
which gives rise to the slight drop in the interest cover.
2018 2017
3560 3560
= =
3560 + 14240 3560 + 13830
= 20% = 20.47%
• This ratio has improved slightly but as a result of decreased debt but rather an increase in
retained profits
2018 2017
0.15 0.1449
= =
0.2692 0.2189
= 55.72% = 66.2%
2018 2017
𝑅926 000 𝑅753 000
𝑒𝑝𝑠 = 𝑒𝑝𝑠 =
3 440 000 3 440 000
= 0.2692 = 0.2189
Dividend 2017: Dividend growth is 3.5% therefore Div2018 is 3.5% bigger than Div2017
∴ R0.15 ÷ (1+3.5%) = R0.1449
𝑁𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 = 𝑅11 180 000 ÷ 𝑅3.25 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒 = 3 440 000 𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠
Return on equity
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒇𝒊𝒕 𝒂𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒂𝒙
=
𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒚
2018 2017
𝑅926 000 𝑅753 000
= =
𝑅14 240 000 𝑅13 830 000
= 6.5% = 5.45%
• Equity remained fairly stable while earnings per share grew by 23%
• More of revenue was converted into profits.
• As mentioned earlier revenues increased at a better rate than costs.
1. Interest received is assumed to be earned from cash and cash equivalents. It has been left out of
the free cash flow as the actual cash balances will be added to the value.
2.
Taxation R
Taxation per SOCI 334 000
Add: Tax on interest paid 84 000
Less : tax on interest received (11 200)
406 800
3.
Capital expenditure R
Opening carry value 9 500 000
Depreciation (560 000)
Closing carry value (9 975 000)
(1 035 000)
Value of operations
𝐹𝐶𝐹1
𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 =
𝑊𝑎𝑐𝑐 − 𝑔
Valuation
The NAV is being compared to the FCF value before owner level adjustments.
The Difference in value is due the fact that NAV is based on historical results which excludes
potential growth, while the FCF method has been based on future sustainable cash flows with
growth built into the valuation
10
Calculations
1. R4 500 000 x 20%
2. 2 single payments then 3 double payments: 𝑥 + 𝑥 + 3(2𝑥) = 𝑅3 240 000𝑥 3𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑠
∴ 𝑥 = 𝑅1 215 000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 2𝑥 = 𝑅2 430 000
3. R25 000 x 4 quarters = R100 000, increase by 6% thereafter
4. R120 000 per nurse x 3 = R360 000, increase by 6% thereafter
5. R4 500 x 12 months x 3 units = R162 000, increase by 6% thereafter
h) The NPV is negative, therefore from a quantitative perspective the project should be rejected.
From a qualitative perspective
• To try and procure additional funding as this is a PBO
• The service is for the community and maybe to negotiate better prices on the mobile units
• Try to get some private funding as well
11
MAC3702
MAY/JUNE 2019
SUGGESTED SOLUTION
QUESTION 1
a)
REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Dear Sir/Madam
Following your request, we have performed a SWOT analysis of the company and present our findings
below.
Strengths
• The company has strict food guidelines. Products were tested negative for listeriosis.
• Owns its own abattoir so they can control slaughtering and storage process.
• They have good recruitment processes.
• There are good working conditions and management ensures that staff morale is high.
• They have skilled workers which ensures that food quality is not compromised
• Advertising digital campaign may strengthen its position in the market.
• The company strictly adheres to guidelines and legal requirements with respect to all the applicable
Acts.
• Workers are well compensated, and this ensures staff retention.
Weaknesses
• Too many policies and procedures and some policies may easily be compromised.
• Decision-making is complex and lengthy which does not facilitate quick action.
• Large footprint may prove difficult to control.
• Heavily dependent on key skilled personnel which puts the employee in a better bargaining
position with the company
Opportunities
Threats
Yours faithfully
b) Human Capital
Training spend
% increase =
5 800
−1
5 100
= 13,73%
= 3,43%
= 9,9%
The company has employed more people in 2018. The number of employees is up 3,43% from 582
people to 602 people.
The company in total has spent an additional 13,73% on training which translates to an average
increase of 9,9% per person.
Clearly the company is making progress with respect to its human capital.
Natural Capital
Electricity consumption =
15,5 mil
15,1 mil
= 2,65%
Kilowatt hrs consumption went up despite the implementation of energy efficient lighting. The
production facilities with respect to power usage by machines may be responsible for the increase.
Water consumption
Decrease % =
7 050
−1
9 100
= -22,53%
Water consumption has decreased by 22,53%. The medium pressure wash-down system is clearly
working, however, not yet at the 30% mark.
= 2,91%
This is cause for concern. Management needs to implement measures to curb these Greenhouse gas
emissions, maybe by employing an environmental expert.
c) WACC
Equity
Ke =
𝐷𝐷1
+g
𝑃𝑃0
(35m+45m)×1,0906
= 3 216
+ 0,0906
= 11,77%
P0 =
D0 Loan = 1/11/2014 – 30/10/2019
Kp
=
105m ×0,3255 FV = 750m
9%
PMT = 750m x [10,25%-1.25%] x 0.72
= 379,75m i = (10,25 + 0,25 ) x 0.72
n = 1
PV = 742,47
The company has low levels of debt which means low levels of financial risk. However, the company
must consider its target capital structure and its capacity to raise either debt or equity. Additional
debt will lower the weighted average cost of capital but will increase financial risk.
= 51,76%
Gross profit percentage can be improved by controlling input costs such as raw material, labour and
overhead cost. Also, improved sales levels above inflation will contribute towards a better gross
profit.
= 29,965%
This is probably attributable to expenditure that was not deductible for tax purposes. Better tax
planning may improve this ratio.
= 3,61 times
Improved profitability and a reduction in interest bearing debt will lead to a better ratio.
= 2,48%
= 2,57 times
An improvement in the share price will have a positive impact on this ratio or lower sales. However
lower sales is not something a company would want.
• Operating costs
% of sales Operating Expenses ∗ 250
= =
Sales 1 250m
= 20%
*Operating Expenses
More cost control, especially over fixed costs will have a positive effect on the ratio. Increased
revenue will also have a positive effect of improving this ratio.
e)
Sustainable profits
2018 2017 2016
R’000 R’000 R’000
Profits before taxation 36 592 74 595 54 625
Restraint of trade 8 000 - -
Once of grant (1) (9 570)
GP on delayed sales(2) 14 118
58 710 65 025 54 625
Taxation @ 26,83% (15 752) (17 446) (14 656)
Profit after taxation 42 958 47 579 39 969
Weighted average x3 x2 x1
128 874 95 158 39 969
PE Multiple
Similar listed company [1 ÷ 8.888%] 11,25
Specific risk adjustments
Size of company -
Opportunity with respect treatment of Listeriosis +
Reliance on key manager -
Poor performance -
Turnover expected to grow +
Estimated PE 9
Valuation R’000
Earnings 44 000
PE multiple 9
Value before owner level adjustments 396 000
f)
Divisible projects
These projects are projects that can be broken down into smaller parts when undertaken. This is usually
important when sufficient capital may not be available to embark on the entire project all at once.
Projects Eishkom and Sediba can be done in stages, for example one plant at a time. However, the E-
learning platform will have to done in one go and is therefore not considered as divisible.
Independent projects
Projects are said to be independent when they are stand-alone and not compared to other projects
during the selection process. If the NPV is positive it will be accepted and if negative will be rejected. All
3 projects are for different purposes and are therefore independent of one another.
Capital rationing
Capital rationing is the process of allocating limited capital to projects that will maximise, in
combination, shareholders wealth. In other words, a mix of independent projects where their combined
NPV’s maximise shareholder wealth, obviously within the constraints of the available capital. The NPV’s
of the 3 projects will need to be compared and the best combination selected with capital constraints.
• Processed food manufacturers had to withdraw products from the shelves of supermarkets and the
like costing billions of rands with respect to loss of profits as well as incurring substantial costs to
dispose of the products
• Additional costs had to be incurred to ensure safety of products and no cross contamination of
products. This had had significant consequences for cash flows.
• Loss of lives have caused loss of productivity and capacity in the economy.
• Compensation to families have also put pressure on companies with respect to cash flows as well as
reputational damage.
• All of the above factors have far reaching effects on the economy.