Strama-Syllabus V3
Strama-Syllabus V3
COURSE SYLLABUS
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course will provide the students with a more in-depth knowledge of the various strategic management
theories and their applications in hospitality-related organizations. Both the macro and micro perspectives of strategic
management will be included in the discussion.
Under micro perspectives, theories of quality management, lean philosophy, learning & knowledge
management, organizational excellence, and strategic human resources management will be introduced. In macro
perspectives, different internationalization strategies and the factors that influence these strategies will be discussed.
The emphasis in this course is to develop among students a perspective of managing a hospitality business through
strategic eyes, as well as utilize tools and techniques of strategic management in developing and implementing sound
hospitality strategies.
The course will have a special provision on modality, pacing, pedagogy, assessment type, communication, and
feedback based on the national, regional, provincial, city, and institutional guidelines for the safety amidst disaster and
pandemic. Hence, this class shall be delivered in both online and offline/module-based approach. This course is also
compliant with Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) and 21st Century Learning Design (21CLD) frameworks.
Summative Assessment
Onsite Activities
Allotted Hours
Asynchronous
Synchronous
Teaching-Learning Activities / Assessment
Strategy
Module No
and
Learning Offline/Printed Online Module Technology
Outcome(s) Week Module Activities Activities Enabler
Printed course
Syllabus uploaded Schoolbook
syllabus
Presentation of MS Teams
1 Course overview / 1.5
course introduction PowerPoint
Diagnosis Test with
Diagnosis Test
Module 1 answer key
Gospel reflection
CLO 1 Gospel reflection
essay
CLO 5 essay
Tips to succeed in
Tips to succeed in a
1 distance learning Schoolbook / 1.5
fully online class
via printed module
Course requirement
Course requirement
details
details
Gospel reflection
Gospel reflection discussion
essay Introduction to
Introduction to Strategic
PowerPoint
Strategic Management
2 Recorder / 1.5
Management lesson
Schoolbook
Exercises on Practice
Strategic assessments on
management Strategic
Module 2 management
Enabling Enabling
assessment quiz on assessment quiz on
TLO 2 the Main the main
CLO 1 2 Components of the components of the Schoolbook / 1.5
CLO 5 Strategic Planning strategic planning
Process process
Gospel reflection
Gospel Reflection essay
Measuring Measuring
competitive competitive
3 advantage advantage Schoolbook / 1.5
Enabling Enabling
assessment: Case assessment: A case
Study study
Module 2
Summative
assessment: 1: long
TLO 2 Summative
quiz on Strategic
CLO 2 assessment 1: long
Management,
CLO 5 quiz on Strategic
Components of the
Management,
strategic planning
Components of the
4 process, Vision, Schoolbook / 1.5
strategic planning
Mission and
process, Vision,
Values, and
Mission and Values,
competitive
and competitive
advantage
advantage
Gospel reflection
Gospel reflection
essay
essay
Enabling
Enabling Schoolbook
7 assessment: case / 1.5
assessment: case
analysis
analysis using the
PESTEL model
SELF-CARE/ME-
7 1.5
TIME
Word Hunt
Selection of Word Hunt
appropriate A lesson in Schoolbook
8 strategies: Selection of / 1.5
MS Teams
Functional level, appropriate
Business level strategies
Lesson exercises
Enabling Enabling
assessment: Assessment: a
8 Schoolbook / 1.5
Selection of selection of
appropriate strategy appropriate strategy
9 Consultation (if Consultation (if 1.5
willing and able) willing and able)
Summative Summative
9 assessment 2: Case assessment 2: Case Schoolbook / 1.5
Analysis Analysis
13.
TOTAL 4.5 5
3.0 3.0 27.0
Learning Outcomes for the Final Period
Course Learning Outcomes Topic Learning Outcomes
TLO5. Discuss the process of strategy evaluation and its
CLO3. Analyze and evaluate critically real-life significance in the performance of the organization
company situations and develop creative TLO6. Compare the difference between corporate strategy vs
solutions using strategic management global strategy
perspective TLO 7. Understand the importance of strategy implementation
TLO 8. Identify the challenges that an organization faces
Summative Assessment
Onsite Activities
Allotted Hours
Asynchronous
Synchronous
Teaching-Learning Activities / Assessment
Strategy
Module No
and
Learning Printed Module Online Module Technology
Outcome(s) Week Activities Activities Enabler
10 SELF-CARE / ME-TIME 3.0
Gospel reflection
Gospel reflection
essay
essay
Selection of
Selection of
appropriate strategies:
appropriate
Corporate level,
11 strategies lesson /
business, and Schoolbook 3.0
Lesson exercise
functional level MS teams
Word mine
Module 4 Lesson exercises
A lesson in strategy
Word mine
implementation
TLO 5 Strategy
TLO 6 implementation
TLO 7 Gospel reflection Gospel reflection
CLO 3 essay essay
CLO 5 Enabling assessment: Enabling Schoolbook
/ 1.5
factors that support assessment: factors
strategy that support strategy
12 implementation implementation
Strategy review, Lesson on strategy
evaluation, and review, evaluation,
Schoolbook / 1.5
control and control.
Lesson exercise Lesson exercise
Enabling assessment:
Case analysis
Review and evaluate Enabling
Module 5 13
the strategy of the assessment: Case Schoolbook
TLO 7 hospitality-related analysis PowerPoint
TLO 8 business. /
Review and Recorder 1.5
TLO 9
CLO 3 evaluate the strategy
CLO 5 of the hospitality-
related business
Consultation (if Consultation (if
13 / 1.5
willing & able) willing & able)
Essay on the
Essay on the progress MS Teams
progress of the final /
14 of the final output MS Forms 3.0
output
Essay on the
Essay on the progress progress of the final
15 /
CLO1 of the final output output 3.0
CLO2
CLO3 Presentation of Final Presentation of
CLO4 Output Final Output
16
CLO 5 Reflection of the Reflection of the MS Teams 3.0
& 17
entire module entire module
Module submission Module submission
GRADING SYSTEM
Midterm
Enabling Assessments - 60%
Summative Assessments - 40%
100%
Finals
Enabling Assessments - 50%
Summative Assessments - 50%
100%
3. Attendance Policy
a. Attendance Policy for Online Classes is scheduled based on the learning plan. Attendance, especially
in synchronous classes, shall not be a basis for receiving a failing grade. It will not comprise any grade
in the class standing.
b. RSVP as part of an ethical process of conducting online meetings, the following will be observed:
i. The synchronous meeting will be made by the teacher at least 14 calendar days before its
schedule.
ii. The student must RSVP at least three days before the scheduled synchronous meeting.
iii. The faculty will announce two days before the calendared synchronous meeting if it will push
through or if it will be cancelled. If canceled, the faculty will announce a replacement
asynchronous activity and the new schedule of the synchronous meeting.
c. The minimum required attendees in synchronous class shall be 50 percent of the entire class. It is the
faculty’s prerogative whether to continue or discontinue the session if it does not reach 50 percent.
However, if the attendees are less than 20 percent of the total class, the synchronous session will be
rescheduled, an asynchronous learning activity will take the place of the supposed synchronous
meeting.
d. All synchronous meetings will be recorded and embedded into a schoolbook page section. It will also
be accessed by students at MS Teams and other institutionally subscribed video hosting platform.
e. The synchronous meeting will only be held at the schedule indicated in the registration form.
5. Other Policies
a. Attire - students must wear decent casual or smart-casual attire prescribed by the Student Handbook.
b. Microphone Use – microphone must be muted and only unmuted when the teacher requires them to.
c. Video – videos may be used by the teacher to validate attendance. However, the student can choose to
turn off the video if the teacher allows them to.
d. The use of English is required for any presentation including the question and answer. Tagalog or
Taglish can be used during consultation.
REFERENCES:
Online References
Call Reference Material
number or
e-provider
Hill, C.W., Jones, G.R., Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated
Online
Approach 11th Edition, Cengage Learning, 2014
Okumus, et.al. (2019). Strategic Management for Tourism and Hospitality 2nd Edition, Elsevier
Ltd., 2019 https://books.google.com.ph/books?
Online id=nHm6DwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=strategic+management+for+hospitality&
hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjdi9HbuMnrAhWEQN4KHZI3BLgQ6AEwAnoECAMQAg
#v=onepage&q=strategic%20management%20for%20hospitality&f=false
Barney, J.B., Hesterly, W.S. (2015). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage
Concepts & Cases 5th Edition. Pearson Education Limited
Online
2015file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Strategic%20Management%20and%20Competitive
%20Advantage%20Concepts%20and%20Cases%20(%20PDFDrive.com%20).pdf
Online Rothaermel, F.T. (2016). Strategic Management 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill Education, 2016
Kazanas, H.C., & Rothwell, W. (2003). Human Resources: Strategic Planning for Personnel
Online
Management 2nd Edition, Human Resource Development Press, Inc. 2003
Youtube Business To You, (2018). PESTEL Analysis Explained. Retrieved from
Channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYn4CyL3r5w&t=251s
Youtube David Kryscynski, (2020). Corporate vs. Business Strategy. Retrieved from
Channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X50pXorhtjY
Youtube 365 Careers, (2017). Business Strategy – SWOT Analysis. Retrieved from
Channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-NWhwskTO4
Youtube Gregg Learning, (2019). Mission and Vision. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Channel v=9Nod9e0jZEk
On-Site Reference
Call Reference Material
number or
e-provider
Okumus, et.al. (2019). Strategic Management for Tourism and Hospitality 2nd Edition, Elsevier
Ltd., 2019
By going through the entire process of an HSA, the student can apply all the concepts of strategic
management, as well as all the other management courses that he has taken in the past. It is for this
reason that this research project is what we call an ‘integration project’, where the students are expected
to look at their chosen company from a total business perspective.
The project objective, therefore, is to enable the student to apply the concepts and tools in Strategic
Management, which in its totality involves the Industry and Environmental Analysis, the Company History
and its current operations, and the Strategy Evaluation, leading to a possible Strategy Reformulation and
Implementation.
Choosing the Company:
(1) The company must be existing/operating for not less than five years.
(2) There is a formal management structure in place
(3) Must have at least 25 full-time/regular employees
The final requirement is a written research paper that contains all the work that the teams have done on the
company of its choice as well as a panel presentation.
(2) Do not use dated information – meaning that data that is more than 3 to 5 years old should not be used.
This is a common mistake of the teams, especially when it comes to industry analysis. Old data is no longer
relevant when doing strategy evaluation and analysis. This does not mean that the team should not write
about the history of the company – that is a different matter altogether. The history of the company is often
relevant, especially when explaining the corporate culture or organization.
(3) The number of pages of the research paper does not determine how well the HSA has been undertaken.
What is important is a concise but thorough case presentation, analysis, and recommendation. Again, it must
be emphasized that only relevant information must be included. As consultants to management, you should
assume that the CEO or the Board have no time to read through thick documents and would prefer very
short and simple reports.
(4) When certain facts are not available, it is important to say so, especially in Part 1, which is the case
presentation. All exhibits and appendices must be numbered. Figures included must be checked for
accuracy so it is important to record complete and specific sources of references.
(5) When an entire case, written under the name of the company, is based on published material such as
annual
reports of a company or its financial statements as reported in a publication, a footnote from the case title
should indicate the source. When substantial quotations are used, permission to reprint must be secured
from the publisher, with an exact indication of the source, including the title of the article, as well as an
author, publisher
, and date of publication must accompany each quotation. Newspaper articles, not syndicated, and
advertised may be used without the formality of securing a release from the company provided due credit is
given to the source from which the material is taken.
(6) The student, unless the case is disguised (with the teacher’s prior permission) should request the written
permission from a ranking executive of the company allowing the case to be used for educational purposes.
The usual procedure is for a manager to sign a statement signifying his organization’s acceptance of the case.
He thereby permits the educational institution (Ateneo) to make it available for use in class.
(7) The suggested report format (which follows this section) is precisely what it is: A SUGGESTION.
Students
are not required to comply with every section that is contained in the outline but instead use its
judgment to discern which sections are more fitting and relevant than others. For example, in the strategy
evaluation section, several tools are available to the students (to be taught during the
semester). However, some of these tools may not be relevant to the company that has been chosen, so the
team is not expected to force-fit the tool into the research paper. In the end, the final determinant of what
to include and what not to is whether the resulting paper is logical inflow, and most importantly whether or
not the conclusions and recommendations have been properly supported in Part 1 and Part 2.
(8) Most of the teams take the strategy of dividing the whole paper into sections, and then assigning various
individuals to write-up their assigned sections, without careful discussions. BE CAREFUL IN DOING
THIS! If
the teams do this, what ends up is also a disjointed and confusing research paper. It is easy to tell when a
team has done this – it normally does not take the teacher past the first 10 pages to know that this is exactly
what has happened. Take the time out to discuss first the company and your observations, before actually
starting to write the research paper. After spirited and meaningful discussions, outline the paper
and your thoughts – only then should the team assign the actual write-ups to different members of the team
(if the team opts to do this). Have one or two members of the team do the final editing so that the said
member can also check for the logical flow.
(9) Finally, start research early. This is one project where the students cannot get away with putting it off
until the last minute. It takes time to gather the information, do the analysis, and finally end up writing the
entire paper.
Suggested Report Format
PART ONE: THE COMPANY
1. Introduction – Briefly describe the company and the industry where it competes in. Then focus on a
situation or
a scenario wherein the company's CEO (or top management) is confronted with strategic problems or issues
requiring critical decisions such as a change in the firm’s environment, focus, direction, strategy, objectives
and/or a series of corrective actions needed by the firm. Describe and formulate such as a problem for top
management to solve.
5. Strategic Options
a. Feasible alternative strategies are available to the organization
b. Corporate strategies
c. Business strategies
d. Functional strategies