Chapter 4 Underlying Assumptions
Chapter 4 Underlying Assumptions
3. Combined financial statements — These are the financial statements when the
reporting entity comprises two or more that are not linked by a parent and subsidiary
relationship.
The parent is the entity that exercises control over the subsidiaries.
Consolidated information is useful for existing and potential investors, lenders and other
creditors of the parent in their assessment of future net cash inflows to the parent.
This is because net cash inflows to the parent include distributions to the parent from its
subsidiaries.
Consolidated financial statements are not designed to provide separate information about
the assets, liabilities equity, income and expenses of a particular subsidiary.
Such information can be useful to the existing and potential investors, lenders and other
creditors of the parent because a-claim against the parent typically does not give the
holder of that claim against subsidiaries.
Reporting entity
A reporting entity is an entity that is required or chooses to prepare financial
statements.
The reporting entity can be a single entity or a portion of an entity, or can comprise more
than one entity.
Reporting period
The reporting period is the period when financial statements are prepared for general
purpose financial reporting.
Financial statements may be prepared on an interim basis, for example, three months, six
months or nine months.
To help users of financial statements to identify and assess change in trends, financial
statements also provide comparative information for at least one preceding reporting
period.
Financial statements may include information about transactions and other events that
occurred after the end of reporting period if the information is necessary to meet the
general objective of financial statements.
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS
Accounting assumptions are the basic notions or fundamental premises on which the
accounting process is based. Accounting assumptions are also known as postulates. Like a
building structure that requires a solid foundation to avoid or prevent future collapse and
provide room for expansion, and so with accounting.
The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting mentions only one assumption, namely
going concern.
However, implicit in accounting are the basic assumptions of accounting entity, time
period and monetary unit.
Going concern
The going concern or continuity assumption means that in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, the accounting entity is viewed as continuing in operation indefinitely.
In other words, the financial statements are normally prepared on the assumption that
the entity will continue in operations for-the foreseeable future.
The going concern postulate is the very foundation of the cost principle.
Thus, assets are normally recorded at cost. As a rule, market values are ignored.
However, some new standards require measurement of certain assets at fair value.
If there is evidence that the entity would experience large and persistent losses or that
the entity's operations are to be terminated, the going concern assumption is abandoned.
In this case, the users of the statements will have a great interest in the amount of cash
that will be generated from the entity's assets in the short term.
Accounting entity
In financial accounting, the accounting entity is the specific business organization, which
may be a proprietorship, partnership or corporation.
Under this assumption, the entity is separate from the owners, managers, and employees
who constitute the entity.
Accordingly, the transactions of the entity shall not be merged with the transactions of
the owners.
The reason for the entity assumption is to have a fair presentation of financial
statements.
The personal transactions of the owners shall not be allowed to distort the financial
statements of the entity.
For example, the cash invested by the proprietor is treated as an asset of the
proprietorship.
The shareholder is not the corporation and the corporation is not the shareholder.
However, where parent and subsidiary relationship exists, consolidated statements for
the affiliates are usually made because for practical and economic purposes, the parent
and the subsidiary are a "single economic entity".
The consolidation, however, does not eliminate the legal boundary segregating the
affiliated entities.
Time period
A completely accurate report on the financial position and performance of an entity
cannot be obtained until the entity is finally dissolved and liquidated.
Only then can the final net income and net worth of the entity be determined precisely.
However, users of financial information need timely information for making an economic
decision.
The time period assumption requires that the indefinite life of an entity is subdivided
into accounting periods which are usually of equal length for the purpose of preparing
financial reports on financial position, performance and cash flows.
By convention, the accounting period or fiscal period is one year or a period of twelve
months.
The "one-year period" is traditionally the accounting period because usually it is after one
year that government reports are required.
The quantifiability aspect means that the assets, liabilities, equity. income and expenses
should be stated in terms of a unit of measure which is the peso in the Philippines.
How awkward to see financial statements without any common unit of measure. Such
statements would be largely unintelligible and incomprehensible.
The stability of the peso assumption means that the purchasing power of the peso is
stable or constant and that its instability is insignificant and therefore may be ignored.
The stable peso postulate is actually an amplification of the going concern assumption so
much so that adjustments are unnecessary to reflect any changes in purchasing power.
The accounting function is to account for nominal pesos only and not for constant pesos
or changes in purchasing power.
In today's world, the assumption that the peso is a stable measure over time is not
necessarily valid.
Consider an equipment that was imported 10 years ago from the United States for
$100,000 when the exchange rate was P35 to $1 or an equivalent of
If the same equipment is purchased now and assuming there is no change in the $100,000
purchase price, the replacement cost in terms of pesos would be in the vicinity of
considering a current exchange rate of P54 to $1.
Obviously, there is a significant gap between historical cost and current replacement
cost.
In this regard, an entity may choose the revaluation model as an accounting policy.