Testing Fso WDM Communication System in Simulation Software Optiwave Optisystem in Different Atmospheric Environments
Testing Fso WDM Communication System in Simulation Software Optiwave Optisystem in Different Atmospheric Environments
net/publication/308498926
CITATION READS
1 998
7 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Device for measurement and processing of biosignals with the use of fiber optic sensors View project
TA ČR GAMA: PRE SEED VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava fund - BroadbandLIGHT View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Jan Latal on 22 January 2018.
ABSTRACT
In this article the author’s team deals with problems of modulation formats for Free Space Optical (FSO) Communica-
tions. FSO communications have high bandwidth, low signal attenuation, quick installation, security, unlicensed band
and low cost. In FSO communication occurs due to the influence of atmospheric effect (attenuation, and fluctuation the
received power signal, influence turbulence). Here will be dealing modulation schemes OOK (On-Off keying) and Sub-
carrier Intensity Modulation (SIM) based on a BPSK (Binary Phase Shift Keying). In which will studied their character-
istic and effect of atmospheric influence on the received signal. This results in decreased Eye-Diagram, Signal-to-Noise
Ratio (SNR) and Bit Error Rate (BER). To evaluate the modulation formats in atmospheric turbulence is used simula-
tion box with heat and wind sources.
Keywords: Free space optics, fluctuations, turbulences, modulation, demodulation, OOK, BPSK.
1. INTRODUCTION
At FSO the communication runs by means of light in the atmosphere under the full-duplex operation. There is
a carrier wave that is used for communication. This wave includes one or more wave divisible channels. The power of
these channels is transmitted by one or more volumes. The FSO transmission path consists of two optical heads
integrating both the optical transmitter and the receiver. The transmitting unit is composed of a modulator and radiation
sources. The receiver section consists of a detector and a demodulator. Both the receiver and the transmitter are equipped
with adaptive optics. Adaptive optics focuses the optical beam on the detector and this way it increases its profits.
In the optical transmitter, the laser, laser diodes (LDs), LEDs, or infrared emitting diodes (IREDs) are used as the sources
of radiation. The sources of radiation are modulated either indirectly or directly by changing the excitation current of the
optical source. The communication takes place in the transmission windows of 850 nm, 1550 nm, and at longer
wavelengths. At the receiver, the photodiodes of the PIN type as well as more sensitive avalanche photodiodes APD are
used [1], [2].
The advantages of FSO are the installation speed, operating in an unlicensed band, security (complex interception),
high data rate and ease of portability. FSO can be used for the last mile networks as a replacement for the RF [1], [2],
[13].
As compared with the RF system, FSO is less affected by rain and snow, but, on the other hand, it can be more affected
by atmospheric turbulences and fog. The RF communication is very sensitive to rainfall (hydrometeors). During the
turbulences, the turbulent cells of different refractive indices are created. These refractive indices vary due to the fluctua-
tions of their density and temperature. These changes in refractive index bend the light beam (from its original path),
resulting in fluctuations of the received light output. The size and frequency of the fluctuations of the received power
depend on the amplitude of the turbulent cells. The change of path occurs when the beam passes through a cell that is
bigger than this volume. When the beam passes through the smaller cell, there appears the deformation of the wave front
[4].
Laser Communication and Propagation through the Atmosphere and Oceans IV, edited by Alexander M. J. van Eijk,
Christopher C. Davis, Stephen M. Hammel, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 9614, 96140S
© 2015 SPIE · CCC code: 0277-786X/15/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.2180335
1.1.1 OOK-NRZ
OOK (On-Off-Keying) is the most used modulation format in commercial surface FSO communications. One of its
advantages is resistance to non-linearity on the laser and on the external modulator. But it is sensitive to turbulences and
other disturbances when the received optical power fluctuates. To reduce the fluctuation of the received power it is pos-
sible to replace the solid decision-making level by the adaptive decision-making level. OOK can be used in the format
NRZ or RZ. At the NRZ, the optical power “αe PT“ represents symbol “0“ and the optical power ”PT“ represents sym-
bol “1“. The extinction ration of the optical source is situated in 0 <αe> 1. The duration of the pulse is the same as the
duration of the symbol ”T”. The required bandwidth corresponds to the transmission speed. The probability of errors can
be expressed as the function [4], [5], [6], [14]:
1 1
BER OOK NRZ erfc SNR , (1)
2 2 2
1.1.2 BPSK
This modulation is two-state. The phase of carrying wave is influenced here. The format changes the phase of the refer-
ence carrier signal. The change of the phase is controlled by the modulating rectangular polar pulses of duration time T
when the phase can acquire two discrete states, for example 0 and 180. The BPSK is the simplest form of the PSK.
It is the sturdiest form of all PSK. For the incorrect detection of the bite this form needs the largest noise or distortion.
The bandwidth is the same as the bite speed. The probability of error can be expressed as a function [4], [5], [6]:
1 SNR
BER BPSK erfc
2 2 , (2)
a) b)
Figure 1: a) Bigger turbulence than optical beam b) Smaller turbulence than optical beam [8].
If the diameter of the optical beam is the same as the diameter of the turbulent cell the turbulence behaves as the lens
which don’t change the direction of the optical beam but increases its divergence. At this type of turbulence,
there is constant change of attenuation and phase delay. If the optical beam has bigger diameter than that of turbulent
ln roz
V , (4)
koef (550 nm)
where τroz is resolution threshold [%], αkoef is extinction coefficient [km-1].
1.2 Measuring station for testing atmospheric effects on the modulations formats at FSO
For the purposes of the measurements, a measuring station was established (Fig. 2.). It consists of a measuring box, with
length 2.5 m. The box is made of plexiglass 4 mm thick. It is equipped with powerful fans to enable measuring of the
influence of the mechanical turbulences on the optical beam. For the simulation of the thermal turbulences the direct
heaters were used and the glycerin mist generator (Antari F-80Z) was used in order to create the fog. The box was placed
on an iron construction, ahead it the holder of a laser diode was installed on an aluminum construction. The laser diode
shone upright through the faces of the box, the light beam landed on the photo-detector. The photo-detector was also
placed on the aluminum construction.
Current Controller
and Temperature
Controller Mounting and Simulation box
collimation of
TDC205C Photodetector
the LD
CLDM9
TED200C Oscilloscope
TL
LeCroy 204Xi
PRBS
1 2 3
a) b)
Figure 4: a) Box for thermal turbulences. b) Box setup for measuring of fog influence.
During all measurements the diagram of the eye was made. In the box with fog in example with red optical beam we can
see divergence caused by crossing between air-plexiglass-air. Furthermore, we can observe Mie’s disperse on fog parti-
cles. This disperse is manifested by visibility of laser beam from the side view.
A ref
A , (5)
A inf
where the variable Aref represents the variable reference eye diagram and the Ainf represents the variable eye diagram
with atmospheric influence.
2. RESULTS
GD
R9
1k
R8
-1=-
51
Cl
0.1
- 1k
GOD
C2
N
R15
MC1496
R1
SI V+ 3.9k 3 5.t
X2
GNCGNO
C3
0.1u
R13
14
r
1-23- GA N+C3
= 11
R18 510
1 4 S12 ITC2 510
R12
PR °` ' R1s
-¢-
BAISCAR2 1k
R7 R6 R5 LM7171
10kD 10k 51 OUT ITCt
R14 WC CAR
GD GD 50k
YID G
R3
6.811 GOD
CS C
vD +12V
LM78012 6.8u 6.87 u
LM7908
-12V
X
C6 C8
0.1u 01u 1u
D GÑD
GOD
.®
................................................. ........................:......
i..... ...............................
Cl Cl
L
770 mV1tliV 770 mVldiv,
-2.770 V oist -2.770 V ofst
L 1.315V 1.638 V
p 1.3O 15 4 T 1.638V
Dy m 6y 0 mV
a) b)
Figure 7: a) The eye diagram without the influence of fog at OOK NRZ modulation (λ = 650nm)
with bite speed 20 Mbps. b) The eye diagram for fog with attenuation of 3.14 dB on 2.5 m.
The amount of fog that was inflated into the box was determined as a time of dosage (5 seconds). After dispersion of fog
in the box, the measurement started (2 minutes) when at maximal concentration of artificial fog in the box the eye dia-
gram was recorded Fig. 7.b.
With decreasing concentration of fog which condensed on the side of the box the attenuation caused by fog decreased
and the amplitude of the eye diagram opening increased.
I I' 'Yt`..lr:',..,..J,r
...1
.................................ç.....................................[....................... l /p.
é1.
1/4 : .
cl OEM
385 mVicliv
1
385 mVld
O rnV offset
0 mV offset
856 mV 497 mV
856 mV 497 mV
Dy o my 'Sy 0
a) b)
Figure 8: a) The eye diagram without the impact of fog on the BPSK (λ = 650nm) with bite speed 1 Mbps.
b) The eye diagram on the BPSK modulation (λ = 650 nm) with attenuation 3.58 dB on 2.5 meters.
The measurement of the fog effect on the eye diagram was done on the BPSK modulation when fog has same impact on
this modulate format as on the OOK-NRZ modulation when the amplitude of the eye diagram opening decreased. On the
Fig. 8.a. there is eye diagram without the impact of fog (reference). The effect of fog caused decreasing of the optical
signal power and so the amplitude of the eye diagram opening decreased. Fig. 8.b.
1000
-1
800
600
400
200
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Measurement time [min]
'17
a) b)
c) d)
Figure 10: The eye diagram OOK-NRZ modulation – 20 Mbps: a) without any atmospheric turbulences.
b) For switched 1st direct heater. c) For switched 1st and 3rd direct heater. d) For switched 1st, 2nd, 3rd direct heater.
a) b)
...
. . ,........'
.
s ; ,. ,. ..,, . :' .
c) d)
Figure 11: The eye diagram (BPSK modulation - 1 Mbps) a) without any atmospheric turbulences.
b) For switched 1st direct heater. c) For switched 1st and 3rd direct heater. d) For switched 1st, 2nd, 3rd direct heater.
0.9
Ratio of the eye pattem opening
0.8
0.7
0.6 Heater 1
Heater 1, 2
Heater 1, 2, 3
0.5 Lin. regresion 1
Lin. regresion 1, 2
Lin. regresion 1, 2, 3
0.4
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Bitrate [Mbps]
Figure 12: Comparison of turbulent influence on modulation OOK-NRZ for 850 nm wavelength.
3. CONCLUSION
In the previous articles there wasn't noticed significant effect of mechanical turbulences so in this article there are men-
tioned thermal turbulences only. However, regarding the thermal turbulences, the fluctuation of the received power at the
receiver was considerable. This fact is proven by the measured values of the eye diagrams for different types of the mod-
ulation and bit rate. The fluctuations of the received optical power caused the decrease in opening the eye diagram. At
increasing the turbulence size the closure of the eye diagram was more significant. The smallest increase of the eye dia-
gram closing was noticed when thermal heater was installed near the receiver. It influences only short part of the optical
beam. After equalizing temperatures inside the box the effect of thermal turbulences decreased. The bit rate also affects
the closure of the eye diagram and the increasing transmission rate leads to the closure of the eye diagram. The closure
causes the increase of the BER.
The thermal turbulences are mainly manifested in clear weather when the surface of the land is heated and the warm
air rises. Due to we should put a big emphasis on the installation, there shouldn’t be thermal turbulences from warm
surface ahead of FSO head. For these reasons, it is necessary to provide a sufficient diameter of the optical beam on the
receiver as well as to count with a sufficient power reserve. Fog has also an important effect on FSO communication.
Fog is caused by condensation of water vapor over the land. Fog consists of dust elements from emission that partici-
pates in its creating and inhibition. This inhibition and attenuating is dispersed by Mie way. We can fight with this atten-
uating using adaptive decisive level or increasing transmitting power.
REFERENCES
[1] Franz, J. H. and Kumar, J. V., [Optical Communications Components and Systems], Narosa Publishing House, New
Delhi, 1-717 (2000).
[2] Lambert, S. G. and Casey, W. L., [Laser Communications in Space], Artech House, 4-416 (1995).
[3] Kim, I. I. and Ricklin, J. C., “Wireless optical transmission of fast ethernet, FDDI, ATM, and ESCON protocol data
using the TerraLink laser communication system.” Optical Engineering, 3143-3155 (1998).
[4] Majumdar, A. K. and Ricklin, J. C., [Free-Space Laser Communications: Principles and Advances.], Springer, New
York, 1-418 (2010).
[5] Popoola, W. O. and Ghassemlooy, Z., “BPSK Subcarrier Intensity Modulated Free-Space Optical Communications
in Atmospheric Turbulence. ”Journal of Lightwave Technology, 967-973 (2009).
[6] Elganimi, T. Y., “Studying the BER Performance, Power and Bandwidth Efficiency for FSO Communication Sys-
tems Under Various Modulation Schemes.” IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Com-
puting Technologies (AEECT), 1-6 (2013).
[7] Chand, N., Loriz, J., Hunton A. J. and Eteson, B. M., “Performance comparison of NRZ and RZ modulations with
and without forward error corrections for free-space optical communication.” Proceedings of SPIE, Free Space
Laser Communications V, 1-8 (2005).
[8] Barua, B. and Majumder, S. P., “Free Space Optical Communication with OOK and BPSK Modulation Under Dif-
ferent Turbulent Condition.” International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision (ICIEV), 1-5 (2013).
[9] Awan, M. S., Horwath, L. C., Muhammad, S. S., Leitgeb, E., Nadeem, F. and Khan., M. S., “Characterization of
Fog and Snow Attenuations for Free-Space Optical Propagation.” Journal of Communications, 533-545 (2009).
[10] Ramirez-Iniguez, R., Idrus S. M. and Sun Z., [Optical Wireless Communications: IR for Wireless Connectivity],
CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008).
[11] Vanderka, A., Hajek L., Latal J., Vitasek J. and Koudelka P., “Design, Simulation and Testing of the OOK NRZ
Modulation Format for Free Space Optic Communication in a Simulation Box.” Advances In Electrical And Elec-
tronic Engineering 12(6), 604-616 (2014)
[12] Mohammed, N. A., El-Wakkell A. S. and Aly M. H., “Performance Evaluation of FSO Link Under NRZ-RZ Line
Codes, Different Weather Conditions and Receiver Types in the Presence of Pointing Errors,” The Open Electrical
& Electronic Engineering Journal 6(1), 28-35 (2014).
[13] Akbulut, A., “A Practical Approach to Improve Optical Channel Utilization Period for Hybrid FSO/RF Systems, ”
Advances In Electrical And Electronic Engineering, 12(6), 599-603 (2014)
[14] Agalliu, R.,and Lucki, M. “Benefits and Limits of Modulation Formats for Optical Communications, ” Advances In
Electrical And Electronic Engineering 12(2), 160-167 (2014).
DownloadedViewFrom:
publicationhttp://proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org/
stats on 09/15/2015 Terms of Use: http://spiedigitallibrary.org/ss/TermsOfUse.aspx