Screening of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Secondary Metabolites From Endophytic Fungi Isolated From Wheat (Triticum Durum)
Screening of Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Secondary Metabolites From Endophytic Fungi Isolated From Wheat (Triticum Durum)
Nouari Sadrati, Harzallah Daoud*, Amina Zerroug, Saliha Dahamna, Saddek Bouharati
University Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Life
Sétif 19000, Algeria
Abstract: The emergence of antibiotic-resistant micro-organisms calls for inventive research and development strategies. Inhibition
of these pathogenic micro-organisms may be a promising therapeutic approach. The screening of antimicrobial compounds from
endophytes is a promising way to meet the increasing threat of drug-resistant strains of human and plant pathogens. In the present
study, a total of 20 endophytic fungi and 23 endophytic actinomycetes have been isolated from wheat (Triticum durum). Mohamed Ben
Bachir variety collected from Bordj Bou Arreridj region (Algeria) during winter 2010. The isolates were screened and evaluated for
their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Antimicrobial activity was evaluated for crude ethyl acetate extracts using an agar dif-
fusion assay against twelve pathogenic bacteria, yeast, and two phytopathogenic fungi. All extracts showed inhibitory activity on at
least one or more pathogenic microorganisms, with an average zone of inhibition varied between 7 mm to 25 mm, and the largest zone
was of 25 and 25.3 mm against candida albicans and Escherichia coli respectively. The antioxidant capacity of the extracts was evalu-
ated by β-carotene/linoleic acid assay. Results showed that 60% of these extracts have antioxidant activity, exhibiting 50, 57% to 78,
96% inhibitions. While the inhibitory activity for oxidation of linoleic acid of 40% of them was less than 50%. From the present work
it is possible to conclude that these microorganisms could be promising source of bioactive compounds, and warrant further study.
Key words: endophytic microorganisms, antimicrobial activity, antioxidant activity, Triticum durum
*Corresponding address:
[email protected] Unauthenticated
Download Date | 10/25/19 11:03 AM
Screening of antimicrobial and antioxidant secondary metabolites from endophytic fungi isolated… 129
leaves. The number of fungal isolates recovered from roots greatest antagonism activity. The isolates A4W, A8W,
was 12 (60%) with a rate of 0,48% and 32% of isolation and A9W and A10W were more active against P. infestans,
colonization, respectively. Whereas, the number of isolates with an inhibition percentage that reached 54.07% as
from leaves was 8 (40%) with an isolation and colonization the maximum by the isolate A10W. While isolates A2W,
rate of 0,32% and 24%, respectively. Almost, the same re- A3W, A5W, A7W, A8W and A9W were more active
sults were obtained with the actinomycetes (Table 1). against F. oxysporum f. sp. albedinis, with an inhibition per-
centage that reached to 63,89% as the maximum by the
Antagonistic study and identification of endophytes isolate A3W (Table 2). The three isolates of actinomycetes
The isolates were tested for anti-pathogen activity A8W, A9W and A10W, were more effective against most
by the dual culture. Ten isolates (23%) demonstrated the test bacteria, especially E. coli (Table 3).
Table 1. Number of isolates, colonization, and isolation rate from different tissues
Table 2. Inhibition percentages of fungal growth by isolated endophytic fungi and actinomycetes with higher activity in the primary
screening
Table 3. Antagonistic activity of selected endophytic actinomycetes with high activity against test bacteria in the primary screening
Table 4. Identity of selected endophytic fungi and actinomycetes isolated from leaves and roots of Triticum durum Desf.
Table 5. Antimicrobial activity shown by selected endophytic fungi and actinomycetes extracts against tests microorganisms in the
secondary screening
Streptomyces sp. 1
Streptomyces sp. 2
Streptomyces sp. 3
Cladosporium sp.
Chaetomium sp.
Penicillium sp.
Penicillium sp.
Aspergillus sp.
Pathogenic
Alternaria sp.
Phoma sp.
Micro-organisms
Gram+ Bacteria
Bacillus sp. 11.7 10.7 13.7 13.0 11.7 12.0 00 12.0 00 16.0
Staphylococcus aureus 12.0 10.7 13.0 10.7 11.7 9.7 00 00 00 00
Enterococcus faecalis 11.7 10.3 12.7 12.0 11.3 11.7 13.0 00 00 00
Gram- Bacteria
Salmonella typhi 14.3 12.3 14.3 11.3 13.3 11.7 10.0 00 00 11.0
Escherichia coli 18.3 16.0 25.3 19.0 21.7 20.0 15.0 24.5 13.0 15.3
Serratia marcescens 14.3 10.7 12.0 12.0 11.3 10.7 11.0 17.0 13.0 14.0
Enterobacter agglomerans 00 11.0 00 00 00 00 10.0 13.0 10.0 9.0
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 00 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 17.0
Klebsiella pneumoniae 12.0 9.7 13.0 12.0 11.7 12.7 14.0 00 00 00
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 00 12.0 12.3 11.7 13.3 00 10.0 00 00 10.0
Citrobacter freundii 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Pseudomonas sp. 9.3 9.0 9.0 10.3 11.3 00 00 14.0 00 00
Fungi and yeast
Candida albicans 20.7 15.0 23.0 20.0 13.0 15.0 14.0 19.0 25.0 16.0
Fusarium oxysporum f .sp. albidinis 00 00 19.0 11.0 17.0 10.0 15.0 12.0 15.0 00
Phytophthora infestans 8.0 10.0 14.0 17.0 16.0 10.0 00 16.0 14.0 15.3
Table 6. Comparison of average inhibitions of extracts obtained by ethyl acetate and their effect on the growth of test microorganisms
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1. Comparison of average inhibitions of ethyl acetate extracts on the growth of different groups of pathogenic micro-organisms
(fungi, Gram positive and negative bacteria)
Means with the same letter are not significantly different at (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2. Antioxidant activity of crude ethyl acetate extracts of endophytes compared to the controls (BHT, MeOH and H2O) by the test
of β-carotene / linoleic acid after 24 hours
Each point represents the mean ±SD (n = 3), each value of the curve followed by the letters shared no significant difference
among themselves, at (p < 0.05)
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 10/25/19 11:03 AM
134 Journal of Plant Protection Research 53 (2), 2013
ia sp., and Penicillium sp. 1 had less inhibition, with inhi- tested. With regard to actinomycetes, Rabah et al. (2007)
bition percentages of 65.740±4.486%, 64.218±7.569%, and isolated a number of Streptomyces with antimicrobial ac-
63.012±1.734%, respectively. The inhibitory activity of the tivity. Among them, three isolates (SS15, SS19 and SS7)
rest of the isolates: Cladosporium sp., Chaetomium sp. and demonstrated antimicrobial activity against Gram posi-
three Streptomycetes isolates to the oxidation of linoleic tive and negative bacteria, yeast, and fungi.
acid was less than 50% (Fig. 2). Antagonism might be due to the production of bio-
logically active compounds in media (Castillo et al. 2002).
The reason for the different sensitivity between Gram
DISCUSSION positive and Gram negative bacteria could be ascribed to
Differences in colonization and isolation rates have the morphological differences between these microorgan-
been proven in several other studies and are in agreement isms. Gram negative bacteria have an outer polysaccha-
with our results. The differences were those observed be- ride membrane which carries the structural lipopolysac-
tween plants tissues such as roots, leaves, and stems of charide components. This makes the cell wall imperme-
wheat (T. aestivum) (Sieber et al. 1988; Larran et al. 2007); able to lipophilic solutes. Gram positive should be more
between roots and leaves of rice (Naik et al. 2009; Tian susceptible having only an outer peptidoglycan layer
et al. 2004) as well as between roots, leaves, stems, and which is not an effective permeability barrier (Pandey
flowers of several species of medicinal plants (Gong and et al. 2004; Ogundare et al. 2006). The results obtained in
Gou 2009; Lv et al. 2010). The difference in endophytes our study suggest that these endophytes have the poten-
assemblages in the various tissues indicated that some tial to be a source for novel bioactive products.
fungal endophytes have an affinity for different tissue An enormous variety of plants have been studied for
types. This affinity might be a reflection of their capacity new sources of natural antioxidants. Phenolic and flavo-
for utilizing or surviving within a specific substrate (dif- noid compounds derived from plants were proved to be
ferent tissue texture and chemistry) (Huang et al. 2008). potent antioxidants and free radical scavengers. Significant
Most of the isolated fungal taxa active in this study, correlations between phenolic compounds and antioxidant
belong to the common isolated endophytes and were re- properties of medicinal plants were noted (Baghiani et al.
ported as endophytes in previous studies on crops plants. 2010; Khennouf et al. 2010). The same was seen in stud-
They were isolated from T. aestivum (Larran et al. 2002; ies on endophytes. Each of the Phoma, Cladosporium, and
Larran et al. 2007), and from rice O. sativa (Tian et al. 2004; Chaetomium fungi were found to have antioxidant activity.
Naik et al. 2009). The most frequently isolated actinomy- This activity was greater among the Chaetomium fungus
cetes strains from healthy plants were those belonging to accompanied by a greater proportion in the total phenolic
the genus Streptomyces (Zin et al. 2007). content compared with other active isolates. The same was
As all taxa of endophytes were from healthy tis- with the endophytic fungus A. alternata (Fernandes et al.
sues, it appears that either they were non-pathogenenic or 2009). Furthermore, ethyl acetate is often used as an extrac-
the plants had developed a resistance mechanism against tion solvent with a significant selectivity in the extraction
the pathogens. This suggests that the isolates recovered of low-molecular-weight phenolic compounds and high-
here are either avirulent or hypovirulent or are virulent molecular-weight polyphenols (Scholz and Rimpler 1989).
but in a latent phase (Petrini 1991). It is probable that On the other hand, Conde et al. (2008) have reported that
these taxa are not pathogens for their antagonism against ethyl acetate allowed the highest phenolic content and the
phytopathogens. These fungi could be adapted to this selective removal of nonphenolic compounds. Therefore,
host and be antagonists of their pathogens. Depending it could be that the antioxidant activity of ethyl acetate ex-
on their antagonistic capacity, they would be able to dis- tracts of the endophytes isolated from wheat was caused
place, reduce, suppress or induce resistance against them by the presence of phenolic compounds in the extracts.
(Larran et al. 2007). Those active endophytic fungi inside The present results may lead to the conclusion that
the plants may play an important role in protecting the endophytes are considered to be a potential source for
plant host against pathogenic microorganisms and have novel bioactive products (Strobel 2003). The data present-
an intimate correlation with the development and physi- ed in this study demonstrated that extracts of endophytic
ological activity of wheat (Tian et al. 2004). fungus and Streptomycetes isolated from wheat, have anti-
There are many reports about antimicrobial com- microbial and antioxidant activities, especially Penicillium
pounds produced by endophytes in cultures that were ac- sp. 1, Penicillium sp. 2, and Aspergillus sp. Thus, endo-
tive against plant and human pathogenic microorganisms. phytic fungi and actinomycetes play an important role in
Chareprasert et al. (2006) reported an antimicrobial activ- the search for natural compounds. Endophytic fungi and
ity exhibited by endophytic fungi isolated from teak and actinomycetes might also represent an alternative source
rain trees. These fungi were found to produce some me- for the production of therapeutic agents and bioactive
tabolites active against bacteria and yeast. From 67 endo- metabolites that are not easily obtained by chemical syn-
phytic fungi isolated from Q. variabilis, 19.4% (Aspergillus thesis, and which have a high activity against pathogenic
sp., Penicillium sp., and Alternaria sp.) showed significant microorganisms. However, this work will serve as a pre-
antimicrobial activity (Wang et al. 2007). In accordance lude to more comprehensive studies on the chemistry
with Lin et al. (2007) concerning the study of the medicinal and biology of the bioactive natural products produced
plant C. acuminate, 174 endophytic fungi were isolated and by these endophytes. Further examination can be done
from 18 taxa. Alternaria (12.6%) was dominant, and three to learn if endophytes may have the potential to serve as
showed antimicrobial activity from 22 Alternaria extracts a biological control or as new pharmacological agents.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 10/25/19 11:03 AM
Screening of antimicrobial and antioxidant secondary metabolites from endophytic fungi isolated… 135
Liu C.H., Zou W.X., Lu H., Tan R.X. 2001. Antifungal activity of Srividya S., Adarshana T., Deepika V.B., Kajingailu G., Nilanjan
Artemisia annua endophyte cultures against phytopatho- D. 2012. Streptomyces sp. 9p as effective biocontrol against
genic fungi. J. Biotechnol. 88 (3): 277–282. chilli soilborne fungal phytopathogens. Eur. J. Exp. Biol.
Lv Y.L., Zhang F.S., Chen J., Cui J.L., Xing Y.M., Li X.D., Guo S.X. 2 (1): 163–173.
2010. Diversity and antimicrobial activity of endophytic Staniek A., Woerdenbag H.J., Kayser O. 2008. Endophytes: ex-
fungi associated with the alpine plant Saussurea involucrata. ploiting biodiversity for the improvement of natural prod-
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 33 (8): 1300–1306. uct-based drug discovery. J. Plant Interact. 3 (2): 75–93.
Naik B.S., Shashikala J., Krishnamurthy Y.L. 2009. Study on the Stierle A., Strobel G.A., Stierle D. 1993. Taxol and taxane produc-
diversity of endophytic communities from rice (Oryza sa- tion by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pa-
tiva L.) and their antagonistic activities in vitro. Microbiol. cific yew. Science 260 (5105): 214–216.
Res. 164 (3): 290–296. Strobel G.A. 2003. Endophytes as sources of bioactive products.
Nithya K., Muthumary J. 2011. Bioactive metabolite produced by Microbes Infect 5 (6): 535–544.
Phomopsis sp., an endophytic fungus in Allamanda cathartica Strobel G., Daisy B. 2003. Bioprospecting for microbial endo-
linn. Recent Res. Sci. Technol. 3 (3): 44–48. phytes and their natural products microbiol. Microbiol.
Ogundare A.O., Adetuyi F.C., Akinyosoye F.A. 2006. Antimicro- Mol. Biol. Rev. 67 (4): 491–502.
bial activities of Vernonia tenoreana. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 5 (18): Strobel G., Daisy B., Castillo U., Harper J. 2004. Natural prod-
1663–1668. ucts from endophytic microorganisms. J. Nat. Prod. 67 (2):
Orole O.O., Adejumo T.O. 2009. Activity of fungal endophytes 257–268.
against four maize wilt pathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. Tejesvi M.V., Kini K.R., Prakash H.S., Subbiad V., Shetty H.S.
3 (12): 969–973. 2007. Genetic diversity and antifungal activity of spe-
Owen N.L., Hundley N. 2004. Biodiversity of Marine derived cies pestalotiopsis isolated as endophytes from medicinal
fungi and identification of their metabolites. Sci. Prog. 87: plants. Fungal Divers. 24: 37–54.
79–99. Tian X.L., Cao L.X., Tan H.M., Zeng Q.G., Jia Y.Y., Han W.Q.,
Pandey B., Ghimire P., Agrawal V.P. 2004. Studies on the anti- Zhou S.N. 2004. Study on the communities of endophytic
bacterial activity of the actinomycetes isolated from the fungi and endophytic actinomycetes from rice and their
Khumbu region of Nepal. J. Biol. Sci. 23: 44–53. antipathogenic activities in vitro. World J. Microbiol. Bio-
Petrini O. 1991. Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. p. 179–197. In: technol. 20: 303–309.
“Microbial Ecology of Leaves” (J.H. Andrews, S.S. Hirano, Verma V.C., Gond S.K., Kumar A., Mishra A., Kharwar R.N.,
eds.). Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, 516 pp. Gange A.C. 2009. Endophytic actinomycetes from Azadi-
Pitt J.I., Hocking A.D. 1985. Fungi and Food Spoliage. Academic rachta indica A. Juss.: isolation, diversity and anti-microbial
Press, Springer, 519 pp. activity. Microbiol. Ecol. 57 (4): 749–756.
Puri S.C., Verma V., Amna T., Qazi G.N., Spiteller M. 2005. An Wang F.W., Jiao R.H., Cheng A.B., Tan S.H., Song Y.C. 2007. An-
endophytic fungus from Nothapodytes foetida that produces timicrobial potentials of endophytic fungi residing in Quer-
camptothecin. J. Nat. Prod. 68 (12): 1717–1719. cus variabilis and brefeldin A obtained from Cladosporium
Rabah F.L., Saker Elshafei A., Cheikh M.B., Hocine H. 2007. sp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23: 79–83.
Screening, Isolation and characterization of a novel antimi- Xu L., Zhou L., Zhao J., Jiang W. 2008. Recent studies on the
crobial producing actinomycete, Strain RAF10. Biotechnol- antimicrobial compounds produced by plant endophytic
ogy 6 (4): 489–496. fungi. Nat. Product Res. Development 20: 731–740.
Rajagopal K., Maheswari S., Kathiravan G. 2012. Diversity of en- Yadav J., Shrestha U.T., Tiwari K.B., Sahukhal G.S ., Agrawal V.P.
dophytic fungi in some tropical medicinal plants – a report. 2008. Streptomycin – like antibiotic from Streptomyces spp.
Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 6 (12): 2822–2827. isolated from Mount Everest base camp. Nepal J. Sci. Tech-
Sampson K. 1935. Further observations on the systemic infection nol. 9: 73–77.
of Lolium. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 21: 84–97. Yuan Z.L., Zhang C.L., Lin F.C., Kubicek C.P. 2010. Identity, di-
Scholz E., Rimpler H. 1989. Proanthocyanidins from Krameria versity, and molecular phylogeny of the endophytic myco-
triandra root. Planta Med. 55 (4): 379–384. biota in the roots of rare wild rice (Oryza granulate) from
Sieber T., Riesen T.K., Müller E., Fried P.M. 1988. Endophytic a nature reserve in Yunnan, (China). Appl. Environ. Micro-
fungi in four winter wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) biol. 76 (5): 1642–1652.
differing in resistance against Stagonospora nodorum (Berk.) Zhang H.W., Song Y.C., Tan RX. 2006. Biology and chemistry of
Cast. & Germ. = Septoria nodorum (Berk.) Berk. J. Phyto- endophytes. Nat. Product Rep. 23 (5): 753–771.
pathol.122 (4): 289–306. Zin N.M., Sarmin N.I., Ghadin N., Basri D.F., Sidik N.M., Hess
Silva C.F., Azevedo R.S., Braga C., Sliva R., Dias E.S., Schwan W.M., Strobel G.A. 2007. Bioactive endophytic streptomy-
R.F. 2009. Microbial diversity in a bagasse-based compost cetes from the Malay Peninsula. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
prepared for the production of Agaricus brasiliensis. Braz. 274 (1): 83–88.
J. Microbiol. 40 (3): 590–600.
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 10/25/19 11:03 AM