Green Nanotechnology - Solutions For Sustainability and Energy in The Built - Geoffrey B. Smith, Claes-Goran S. Granqvist
Green Nanotechnology - Solutions For Sustainability and Energy in The Built - Geoffrey B. Smith, Claes-Goran S. Granqvist
GREEN
NANOTECHNOLOGY
Solutions for Sustainability and
Energy in the Built Environment
Geoffrey B. Smith
Claes G. Granqvist
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts
have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume
responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to
copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit-
ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system,
without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.
com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and
registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC,
a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
TH880.S65 2010
690.028’6--dc22 2010007968
123
the window areas, and hence the energy issue may become even more
pressing in the future.
This increase is especially marked with regard to roof glazing for
homes, large buildings, and in atria attached to homes in cold climates.
The average solar flux onto a roof is several times that onto a vertical
façade, while heat loss via a glass roof during the winter is also much
larger than for a wall. Glare can also be a major problem, though the
daylighting benefits from roof windows are marvelous if these problems
can be managed. Many building codes severely limit the area of roof
glazing apertures unless special glazing is used. Glazings with variable
optical properties—as illustrated in Figure 4.1 and discussed in the text
following—is an ideal solution for roof windows since their problems
vary with time and solar irradiation intensity, and such glazings can
control heat flows as well as glare. Roof glazings are also combined
increasingly with solar cells for power generation; these solar cells can
reduce glare and solar heat gain while still admitting plenty of daylight.
The solar cells, which are essentially opaque, may create illuminance
patterns inside the building, which may be advantageous or problem-
atic depending on the specific building; if such patterns are unwanted,
they can be removed by having diffusing glass in the roof windows.
Figure 6.1c shows a glazing with integrated solar cells.
Most windows use glass panes. In principle, there are many different
glass types, but float glass is employed in the great majority of all build-
ings—at least in the industrialized world—and is a highly standardized
product [1,2].
Float glass is made by a process in which the glass melt is solidified
on the surface of molten tin. As a result, this glass is characterized by
uniformity and flatness almost on the atomic scale, which is important
for its usefulness as a substrate for thin-film deposition. The middle curve
in Figure 4.2 shows the spectral transmittance of 6-mm-thick standard
float glass within the wavelength range relevant to solar radiation [3]. A
characteristic absorption feature at λ ≈ 1 μm is clearly seen and limits Tsol
100
Low Fe2O3
80
Transmittance (%)
60 Standard clear
40
20
High Fe2O3
0
0.3 0.5 1 2
Wavelength (µm)
Figure 4.2 Spectral transmittance for float glass with three different
amounts of Fe2O3. The upper two curves refer to 6-mm-thick panes and
the lower curve to a 4-mm-thick pane. (From C. G. Granqvist, Materials
Science for Solar Energy Conversion Systems, edited by C. G. Granqvist,
Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 1991; chap. 5, pp. 106–167. With permission.)
thin-film optics [4]; the principles for the optical functionality are dis-
cussed briefly in Section 5.3. Figure 4.3 shows data for two commercially
available foils with different values of Tlum constructed in this way and
backed by glass [5]. Obviously, the reflectance covers a significant part
of the infrared solar radiation, specifically the 0.85 < λ < 1.2 μm range,
where the reflectance from the foil side is ~50%, and hence such a foil can
be used to limit the energy inflow through windows. In the thermal infra-
red, the multilayer foil behaves as a homogeneous one and E therm is high.
Multilayer foils can be manufactured by coextrusion—which in principle
is a very low-cost technique—and have been commercialized recently.
Laminated glass may be used for safety and other reasons. Such glass
normally has a layer of polyvinyl butyral (PVB) sandwiched between two
glass panes and bonded to the glass under heat and pressure. Laminated
glass is of growing importance since it has to be used for safety reasons
in high-rise buildings, and such buildings are the only option for hous-
ing the world’s growing population, more than half of which lives in big
cities today (2010). Car windscreens always use PVB laminates in order
to avoid glass splinters in the case of breakage. The PVB is an efficient
absorber of UV light, and the transmittance at λ < 0.38 μm is almost
zero for a layer thickness of the order of 1 mm.
Prestige-PR70
1
T
0.9 Rf
Rb
0.8
T
0.7
0.6
Intensity
Rf
0.5
0.4
0.3 Rb
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength [µm]
Prestige-PR40
1
T
0.9 Rf
Rb
0.8
0.7
0.6
Intensity
Rf
0.5
T
0.4
0.3
0.2 Rb
0.1
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength [µm]
computations illustrate the role of having one surface with a low value
of E therm. The calculations assumed a low outside temperature and that
there were thermal losses due to wind. Data are shown in Figure 4.4.
The upper two curves indicate that if the emittance of one of the surfaces
in a single pane window is lowered there is a minor drop in the heat
transfer (thermal conductance) from an initial value of about 6 Wm−2K−1,
the effect being largest when the inner surface has a low emittance. For
double glazing, the heat transfer can drop from about 2.8 to 1.4 Wm−2K−1
when either of the surfaces facing the air gap has a low value of E therm.
For triple glazing, finally, the corresponding improvement is from 1.8 to
1.2 Wm−2K−1. The most significant result with regard to a typical double-
pane window is that the heat transfer can be cut to almost half by the use
of a surface treatment giving a low thermal emittance.
6
1
Single glass
5 2
Thermal Conductance (Wm–2 K–1)
3 Double glass
1
4
2 or 3
2 1
6 Triple glass
4 or 5
1
0
0 20 40 60 80
Emittance (%)
0 0
Transmittance
Exp.
Solar Low emittance
0
1 control coating
coating
Reflectance
Exp.
0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
Figure 4.5 Upper part shows relative luminous efficiency for the eye,
a solar spectrum for one air mass (AM1), and blackbody spectra for
three temperatures. Lower parts show transmittance and reflectance for
idealized window coatings designed for “solar control” and for “low
emittance.” Dotted curves refer to experimental data to be discussed
in Section 4.4. (From I. Hamberg, C. G. Granqvist, J. Appl. Phys. 60
(1986) R123–R159. With permission.)
or less resemble those in Equations 4.1 and 4.2 and, therefore, provide a
good starting point for development of spectrally selective window coat-
ings. Very thin layers of Cu, Ag, and Au are of particular interest; alterna-
tive materials are TiN and ZrN as well as Pt and Al. Whereas Ag-based
films have unsurpassed optical properties (cf. Section 3.7), Au-based films
may be of interest under corrosive or otherwise chemically demanding
conditions. The nitrides are notable for their hardness and durability. A
discussion of these matters is found elsewhere [9], and this earlier article
can serve as a general reference to much of the material covered below.
Ag-based films are used on a very large scale in practical fenestra-
tion. Such films are delicate and are only suited for application on sur-
faces facing insulated gas-filled cavities in double-glazed windows. The
films are sometimes referred to as “soft coats” and are normally applied
by high-rate magnetron sputtering.
100
80 Rsol
40 Tlum
Tsol
20
Etherm
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Thickness (nm)
A thin metal film does not grow uniformly on a glass pane or a poly-
mer foil. Rather the growth resembles what happens when water vapor
condenses on a fatty surface—though with the difference that the metal
“droplets” are on the scale of nanometers to micrometers. This effect of
nonuniform “wetting” has been demonstrated many times.
Information on thin-film growth and evolution has usually been
gained from transmission electron microscopy applied to films deposited
onto electron-transparent substrates such as thin carbon films, that is,
onto substrates that are different from the ones actually used in fenestra-
tion. Figure 4.8, however, shows recent scanning electron micrographs
for Au films made by sputter deposition onto glass and the images hence
are appropriate for assessing what really happens for window coat-
ings [12]. The thicknesses of the films are “equivalent” ones, that is,
the thicknesses hypothetical uniform films would have; the term “mass
thickness” is sometimes used. The initial deposition clearly leads to tiny
metallic nuclei formed at certain sites on the substrate, and continued
deposition makes these nuclei grow, which is expected to occur via dif-
fusion of atoms or molecules over the substrate surface as well as by
direct impingement of atoms or molecules. The metal “islands” that are
100
Transmittance (%)
50
d = 6 nm
9
12
16
0
100
16
12
Reflectance (%)
9
50
d = 6 nm
0
0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
200 nm
Figure 4.9 Survey over growth stages, structures, and thickness scales
for thin Au films deposited onto glass by conventional evaporation (c.e.)
and ion-assisted evaporation (i.e.). Optical models for representing the
optical properties are shown. The Maxwell Garnett and Bruggeman
theories for optical homogenization were discussed in Section 3.9. (From
G. B. Smith et al., J. Appl. Phys. 59 [1986] 571–581. With permission.)
fc ~ 0.3 for Au and fc ~0.5 for Ag, with f being metal volume fraction or
area coverage and c denoting the “critical” value. This difference ensues
because highly mobile gold atoms grow together anomalously near the
percolation transition. It implies one can get an Au film to behave as a
metal with less material than in the case of Ag.
100
R
T
Transmittance (%)
Au, d
glass
T
50
d (nm)
0 6
100 7
7.5
8.5
9
Reflectance (%)
50
R
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength (µm)
1
Calculated Transmittance
0.8
L = 0.8
0.6
0.4 0.7
0.5
0.2
0.2
100nm EHT-20.00 kv
Conductor surface
r
(dense or
inhomogeneous R
/nanoporous)
1.0
40 nm
0.9 Dense Au
Reflectance from the glass side
0.8
40 nm gold on 12 nm gold
0.7 particles coated with 2 nm
0.6 alumina
0.5
0.4
0.3
Resonant structure
0.2
0.1
0.0
250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500
Wavelength (nm)
The low values of Tlum and Tsol in contiguous noble metal films hav-
ing low values of E therm are largely due to reflectance at their surfaces.
Consequently, it is possible to increase the transmittance by adding lay-
ers that anti-reflect the metal. One is then led to dielectric/metal and
dielectric/metal/dielectric multilayers. Dielectrics with high refractive
indices—such as Bi2O3, In 2O3, SnO2 , TiO2 , ZnO, and ZnS—give the
largest enhancement of the transmittance. It is possible to optimize for
low-E or for solar control trough proper choices of film thicknesses.
Figure 4.12 shows measured transmittance and reflectance spectra
for TiO2 /Ag/TiO2 films on glass [3]. These data are characteristic for
what one can accomplish by using the three-layer design. It is concluded
that Tlum > 80% and E therm << 20% are obtainable for the two types
of coatings. The solid curves pertain to the coating with maximum IR
reflectance; it yields Tsol ≈ 50% and R sol ≈ 42%. The dotted curves cor-
respond to Tsol ≈ 67 % and R sol ≈ 26%.
Joint development of electrical and optical properties in three-layer
films is of interest for a number of applications, and Figure 4.13 shows
some recent data for ZnO/Ag/ZnO films with each of the ZnO films
being 20 nm thick [18]. The sheet resistance R◽ is given; it is defined by
R◽ = ρ/d where ρ is the resistivity. The stated transmittance corresponds
100
Transmittance (%)
Glass/TiO2/Ag/TiO2
50
1 mm/18/18/18 nm
1 mm/33/13/33 nm
0
100
Reflectance (%)
50
0
0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
100
60
90
Sheet Resistance (ohm/sq.) 50
Transmittance (%)
40 80
30 70
20
60
10
50
0
40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Ag Thickness (nm)
films [19,20], which localize the plasmon fields closer to the Ag. This is
the likely reason the coatings in Figure 4.13 perform worse than those of
optimized thin-film stacks in commercial products, such as those illus-
trated in Figure 4.14 below. The adjacent high-index layers in the latter
coatings are either thinner or slightly separated from the Ag, and the Ag
itself is very flat.
The examples above were thus selected to illustrate scientific princi-
ples rather than today’s (2010) commercial products. In fact, Ag-based
thin films for energy efficient fenestration are now highly optimized, and a
very large number of products are available on the market. The production
is of the order of 60 million m2 per year, with specified thermal, solar, and
luminous (including color) properties. The current technologies are propri-
etary, and the reader is directed to vendors’ technical publications or com-
prehensive databases [5] for specific details to the extent such are given.
Typical coatings go far beyond the three-layer design, and a “simple” low-E
coating can have six layers comprising glass/TiO2(15–20 nm)/ZnO(5–10
nm)/Ag(9–12 nm)/ITO(2–5 nm)/SnO2(35–40 nm)/TiO2(1–5 nm) [21]. An
advanced solar control coating can have as many as nine layers, including
two Ag films. The layer sequences around the silver must ensure imped-
ance matching, just as in the simple case of a three-layer coating.
Figure 4.14 illustrates two sets of data for commercially available
glass with coatings of these general types. The curves designate trans-
mittance, reflectance from the film side of the glass, and reflectance from
0.7
Rb
0.6
Intensity
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength [µm]
Optitherm SN
1
T
0.9 T Rf
Rb
0.8
Rf
0.7 Rb
0.6
Intensity
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength [µm]
the back side (so that the light has passed through the glass before being
reflected). It is remarkable that these multilayer window coatings are
prepared with thickness control approaching atomic precision in high-
performance production environments handling glass sheets up to 30
m 2 in size. Figure A1.4 in Appendix 1 shows such a machine. Extremely
high cleanliness of the starting glass is essential, which means multiple
washes and rinses.
Section 4.1.2 contained a brief discussion of multilayer polymer foils
with strong spectral selectivity, and at this point one may wonder why
a similar approach is not used to create solar-control coatings based on
dielectric multilayer thin films with alternating high and low refractive
indices. The reason basically is cost, and coating large surfaces—such as
window panes—with a very large number of layers is time consuming
and, hence, costly. Furthermore, window coatings normally should be
able to provide thermal insulation and have high reflectance for 3 < λ
< 50 μm which is far too wide a range to be accomplished by dielectric
multilayers. Thus, one cannot avoid a metallic-type coating, either of
the kind described above or based on a heavily doped semiconductor as
discussed next.
There are a number of oxides with band gaps which are wide enough
so that they are transparent for luminous and solar radiation and which
also allow doping to sufficiently high levels, in practice up to several
percent, so that they can achieve good electrical conductivity and hence
IR reflectivity. They are often referred to as “transparent conducting
oxides” or TCOs. In practice, these are oxides based on In, Zn, Sn, and
combinations of these. Particularly good properties have been obtained
with In 2O3:Sn, ZnO:Al, ZnO:Ga, and SnO2:F. The first of these is often
referred to as indium tin oxide or ITO and can serve as a model example
for this class of materials. A thorough discussion of these oxides and of
their achievable properties has been given recently [22], and a review
of their performance with regard to solar energy–related applications
is available as well [9]. A recently discovered alternative to the oxides
mentioned is TiO2:Nb [23,24].
Why are these oxides conducting? Figure 4.15 illustrates the origin
of the conductivity in a highly schematic way for the case of ITO [3]. The
undoped In2O3 has a regular arrangement of oxygen (O2−) and indium
(In3+) ions. When dopants are added, such as tin (Sn4+), they can replace
some of the indium. If the tin density is sufficient, each dopant atom
can be singly ionized by giving off a free electron which, together with
Oxygen
Indium
e– Tin
Sn+
other free electrons with the same origin, renders the material metal-
lic. The onset of metallic properties occurs at a doping level of ~10 −19
cm−3. Electron densities up to ~1021 cm−3, or somewhat above this value,
can be obtained by maximum doping. If one tries to push the doping to
even higher levels, the result will be that the dopant atoms start to form
strongly absorbing metallic clusters so that transparency is lost. The min-
imum resistivity is ~10 −4 Ωcm, or slightly below, and similar data have
been recorded for ZnO-based films. We emphasize the simplified nature
of the doping model outlined here. In fact, In 2O3 has a complicated crys-
tal structure with 80 atoms per unit cell, and there are two nonequivalent
In3+ positions. Also not every tin atom is active as a donor center [25].
A noble metal such as Ag or Au has an electron density of ~6 ×
1022 cm−3, that is, much higher than the electron density for the doped
oxides, and their resistivity is ~2 × 10 −6 Ωcm. These differences imply
that a good low-E coating made of a doped semiconductor must be much
thicker than a metal-based low-E coating with comparable properties.
In fact, the oxide coating must have a thickness of ~200 nm or higher,
as we will find below. This means that details of the initial film growth
are not at all as important as they are for metal-based window coatings.
Another consequence of the fact that the oxide films must have thick-
nesses comparable with the wavelengths of visible light is that minor
variations of this thickness—which may be hard to avoid in practical
large-area coating—can lead to optical effects such as iridescence (some-
what related to the exhibition of color in a soap bubble).
Another important difference between noble-metal-based and
doped-semiconductor-based films is that the latter are much more dura-
ble and can be used even on the exterior surfaces of window panes. The
term “hard coat” is sometimes used to distinguish them from the metal-
based “soft coats.” In particular, SnO2:F films are used for practical fen-
estration; these coatings are normally made by spray pyrolysis directly
onto the hot surface of float glass as it emerges from its solidification on
the liquid tin bath. A similar technique is used to coat the windows used
in cockpits of commercial aircraft (to allow electrical heating and main-
tain impact strength); this glass usually appears iridescent when viewed
from the outside, which is a consequence of film thickness variations.
100
0.9
0.8 T
80
T R 0.7
60 0.6
Intensity
Rf
R 0.5
0.41 µm ITO 40 0.4
CaF2 Rb
0.3
T 20
0.2
0 0.1
0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm)
100 100
60 60
R
40 R In2O3:Sn 0.3 µm
40
In2O3:Sn 0.3 µm Glass
Glass T
20 20
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500
Substrate Temperature (°C) Substrate Temperature (°C)
100
90 Glass
Transmittance (%)
Glass + In2O3:Sn
80
MgF2 0.09 µm
70 In2O3:Sn 0.27 µm
Glass
T
60
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Wavelength (µm)
0.2 µm
(a) (b)
100 nm 100nm
Here ρ(ω) is the dynamical resistivity due to the free electrons and
εIn2O3 contains contributions from valence electrons and polar pho-
nons of In 2O3. This particular formulation is convenient, as will
become obvious later, since it clearly exhibits the role of electron
scattering. The free-carrier part is of the greatest interest since it
is responsible for the electrical conductivity and the IR reflectiv-
ity. We first use the Drude theory that was earlier introduced in
Section 3.4. It can be written
10–2 Experiment
Dynamical Resistivity (Ωcm)
–ρ2
dc
10–3
resistivity
ρ1
10–4
Wavelength (µm)
50 20 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.3
Theory
10–2
Dynamical Resistivity (Ωcm)
–ρ2
10–3
ρ1
10–4
Interband absorption
Eg Shifted bandgap
0.3 Logarithmic bandedge
Electron scattering by grain boundaries etc.
Electron scattering by partly screened Sn ions
1
ħ p
Electron scattering by screened Sn ions
3 Free electron properties
10
ħ PH Phonon absorption
30
Wavelength (µm)
100
T R
10 6 3 Ne = 1×1020 cm–3
0.3 0.5 1 2 3 5 10 20 30 50
Wavelength (µm)
100
R
Reflectance (%)
50
10 6 3 Ne = 1×1020 cm–3
0
0.3 0.5 1 2 3 5 10 20 30 50
Wavelength (µm)
Figure 4.23, where the largest value of Ne lies above the range of what
is possible to achieve in practice. The main result is that the IR reflec-
tance sets in at a wavelength that scales with Ne. Phonon effects, visible
as three peaks in the thermal IR, become entirely swamped as Ne is
increased.
The spectral data allow calculations of various integrated optical
properties. Figure 4.24 shows results for Tsol as a function of film thick-
ness for three values of E therm with Ne as parameter. As discussed in
Section 4.2, there are different heat transfer mechanisms in a window
and, unless one deals with “vacuum windows,” it does not make much
sense to try to decrease E therm to the extreme. Putting E therm = 0.2 lim-
its Tsol to 78% and this is obtained for a 200-nm-thick film. Setting
E therm = 0.15 limits Tsol to 70%, and allowing E therm = 0.25 enhances
Tsol marginally to 80%. The shaded region in Figure 4.24 pertains to
100
0.20
0.15
60 Ne > 1021cm–3
500 nm
10 µm
1.0
0.8
R = 10.3Ω
0.95
R = 22.1Ω
Solar Transmittance
0.90
Transmittance
0.6
0.85
0.4 0.80
0.75
0.2
0.70
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Nanowire Density (µm–2)
0.0
400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
10.3 and 22.1 Ω/◽. The data compare very well with those for Ag-based
multilayer films in Figure 4.13. The meshes consist of structural units
that are large enough to cause significant scattering, and ~20% of the
visible light is scattered at angles exceeding 10°. This haze is a severe lim-
itation for most windows in buildings, whereas it is insignificant, or can
even be advantageous, for applications related to solar cells and LEDs.
1 µm
100
70
60
50
100 1000 10000
Sheet Resistance (Ω)
LaB6
600
ITO
300
200
100
0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Wavelength (nm)
90
80
Luminous and Solar Transmittance (%)
70 Tlum
60
50
40 Tsol
30
20
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
LaB6 Nanoparticle Concentration (wt%)
0.5
100 nm
0.4
Transmittance
180 nm
0.3
0.2
180 nm
0.1
180 nm
0.0
400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
Viewing
θ angle
Matrix
Nanoparticles
Lattice constant a
Figure 4.34 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Color
shifts, caused by a range of viewing angles, in reflected light from a pho-
tonic crystal such as the one depicted in Figure 4.33. Data are shown for
different particle sizes. (R. J. Leyrer, personal communication to one of
the authors [GBS]. Figure courtesy of BASF—The Chemical Company.)
100
80 d = 120 nm
40 d = 170 nm
θ
20
SiO2 (d) Ag (12 nm)
T
0
0 30 60 90
Incidence Angle (deg.)
(a)
(b)
(c)
t
gh
Li
x
θ y
ø
x
Tp(+55°)
Ts(0)
Tp(–55°)
Transmittance (%)
Tp(0)
Ts(±55°)
50
Evaporated Cr film
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength (µm)
Evaporated
80 Cr film Tp
Luminous Transmittance (%)
Tu
60
Ts
40
20
–80 –40 0 40 80
Incidence angle, θ (deg.)
Data were recorded not only with regard to the incidence plane
but also for other directions. A polar representation of T(θ,ϕ,λ) is
then appropriate; ϕ = 0 and ϕ = 180° correspond to the incidence
plane as shown in Figure B4.3.2. Measurements were taken with
laser light at λ = 543 nm and a photodetector matched to the eye’s
sensitivity. Figure B4.3.5 shows data for the same film as above. The
transmittance is illustrated by use of a gray scale with five 5%-wide
intervals. The asymmetry between the left-hand and right-hand
θ
–50 50
(a)
Luminous
θ
–50 50
(b)
Transmittance: 35–40%
40–45%
45–50%
50–55%
55–60%
40
Clear glass
30
Reflective
glass
10
Electro- Thermochromic
chromic
0
0 20 40 60 80
Electric Lighting Energy (kWh/m2)
reflecting glass diminishes the cooling energy but increases the demand
for lighting. Chromogenic technologies—especially the one based on
electrochromics—are found to have strong advantages both for cooling
energy and electric lighting energy.
The detailed numbers in the mentioned studies should be regarded as
tentative. However, there can be no doubt that chromogenic technologies
are able to provide very significant energy savings especially in buildings
that are cooled during a large part of the year. And these energy savings
can be combined with increasing comfort [58]. It is expected that more
analyses will be performed during coming years so that the energy sav-
ings potential can be set on firmer ground.
4.9 Photochromics
60
Darkening Clearing
Luminous Transmittance (%)
40
20
0
0 30 60 90 120
Time (minutes)
100
Clear
80
Transmittance (%)
60
Dark
40
20
0
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Wavelength (µm)
4.10 Thermochromics
energy when there is a need for heating and rejects energy when heating
is not required.
Temperature (°C)
300 100 0 –100
104 NiS
Ti5O9
102
FeSi2 Fe3O4
Ti2O3
100
Conductivity (S/cm)
10–2
VO2
NbO2
10–4
Ti4O7
10–6
V2O3
10–8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
103/T (K)
Figure 4.41 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Scanning
near-field micrographs of 4 x 4 μm areas of VO2 films as measured at the
shown temperatures. Dark blue represent an insulating state and light
blue, green, and red colors represent metallic conductivity. (From M. M.
Quazilbash et al., Science 318 [2007] 1750–1753. With permission.)
100
x: WxV1–xO2
80
0.006
Transmittance at λ = 2.5 µm (%) 0
0.010
0.017
60
0.030
40 0.032
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Temperature (°C)
80
60
20
WxV1–xO2
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06
Doping Level, x
100
100
20°C
50 50
20°C
80°C 80°C
0 0
0 1 2 0 1 2
Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm)
(a) (b)
50
40
0 2 4 6 8
Doping Level (%)
80
VOx Fy
VO2
60
40
20
80 20°C
20°C
60
Transmittance (%)
40
100°C
100°C
20 TiO2/VO2/TiO2
VO2
0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Wavelength (nm)
100
80
20°C
Transmittance (%)
60 20°C
40
100°C
20 100°C
TiO2/VO2/TiO2/VO2/TiO2
VO2
0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Wavelength (nm)
Box 4.4 Thermochromism
in Cloud Gels
Thermochromic windows can include a layer of a polymeric “cloud
gel” [71,72]. Clouding—that is, transition to a diffusely scatter-
ing state—can set in above a temperature τc due to reversible ther-
mochemical dissolution and a thermally induced modification
of the length of the polymer molecules. This means, essentially,
that the material changes between a “grainy” and light-scatter-
ing state and a homogeneous and nonscattering state, as indi-
cated in Figure B4.4.1. The value of τc can lie anywhere within
a wide range by proper choice of material. Figure B4.4.2 shows
the total transmission (direct and diffuse) of radiation through a
one-millimeter-thick cloud gel layer between two glass panes [3].
Both Tlum and Tsol can drop by ~50% when τc is exceeded. Apart
from windows-related applications, “cloud gels” are of interest
for overheat protection, for example in plastic solar collectors (cf.
Section 6.1) [73].
Clear state
(low temperature) (high temperature)
100
Clear
80
Transmittance (%)
60
40 Clouded
20
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Wavelength (µm)
4.11 Electrochromics
)
r
ELECTROCHROMIC r
cto
to lm
uc c fi
t c lm
DEVICE
du
d i
en ic fi
on m om
on
t c e fil chr or
sp om
n
e ag ro uct te)
an hr
r
a r t d ly
ar
a s c
ass
l a n r n le
Tr Io (o
ec
(G Io (e
Gl
El
++ ––
+ –
+ –
+ –
+ –
+ –
+ –
+ Ions –
+ –
ELECTROCHROMIC OXIDES:
H Cathodic coloration He
Li Be Anodic coloration B C N O F Ne
Na Mg Al Si P S Cl Ar
K Ca Sc Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Ga Ge As Se Br Kr
Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Mo Tc Ru Rh Pd Ag Cd In Sn Sb Te I Xe
Cs Ba La Hf Ta W Re Os Ir Pt Au Hg Ti Pb Bi Po At Rn
Fr Ra Ac
Figure 4.49 Periodic system of the elements (apart from the lan-
thanides and actinides). The differently shaded boxes indicate transi-
tion metal oxides whose oxides have clear “cathodic” and “anodic”
electrochromism. (From C. G. Granqvist, Handbook of Inorganic
Electrochromic Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1995.
With permission.)
insertion and known as “cathodic” and those coloring under ion extrac-
tion and known as “anodic.” The terminology clearly points at the kin-
ship between EC technology and battery technology. Figure 4.49 shows
the metallic elements whose oxides exhibit the two kinds of coloration
[76]. Among the cathodic oxides, most attention has been on oxides of
W, Mo, and Nb. Among the anodic oxides, those based on Ir and Ni
stand out as most interesting. It should be noted, though, that Ir is very
rare and precious and hence ill suited for commodity-scale applications.
The only metal with different properties is vanadium for which the V2O5
can exhibit cathodic and anodic features in different wavelength regions,
but this is a special case which we return to briefly in the text to come.
By combining, say, a cathodic EC film with an anodically coloring ion
storage film, one can accomplish devices with both films becoming dark
when charge is moved from one to the other and both films bleaching
when the original charging state is brought back. This complementary
feature also can be used to create color neutrality, provided that ade-
quate combinations of “cathodic” and “anodic” films are used.
Tungsten atoms
(in the plane of the page)
Oxygen atoms
Cubic
(a)
Tetragonal
(b)
Hexagonal
(c)
Figure 4.51 Atomic arrangements for W oxide with (a) cubic, (b) tet-
ragonal, and (c) hexagonal structure. Solid dots indicate sites available
for ions in the open spaces between the WO6 octahedra. Dashed lines
show the extents of the unit cells. (From C. G. Granqvist, Handbook
of Inorganic Electrochromic Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the
Netherlands, 1995. With permission.)
Substrate temperature
RT 150°C 300°C
Structural Model
Y
Y
X X X
Several alternative EC device types have been studied over the years
[9]. Thus, there are metal hydrides with some added catalysts that can
change from a transparent, via an absorbing, to a reflecting state upon
hydrogen exchange. The fact that a reflecting state can be reached is an
asset since such a film does not heat up as much as an absorbing one in
a typical windows-related application. However, the values of Tlum have
so far been too low for general applications and long-term durability has
not been demonstrated. These metal hydrides also exhibit gasochromic
features [86].
Reversible electroplating of a metal onto a glass surface from an
adjacent electrochemically active substance is another conceivable tech-
nique for reflectance modulation [87]. It has been researched for years,
but no practical solution has yet been demonstrated for windows.
Other types of materials require constant electrical powering in
order to remain dark or transparent and revert spontaneously to the
other state in the absence of such powering. The drawbacks with regard
to energy savings are obvious. These technologies include solution- and
gel-based EC redox systems such as those used in today’s antidazzling
rear view mirrors for cars and trucks, and polymer-encapsulated liquid
crystal devices that can switch between states of high and low scatter-
ing [88] and being somewhat analogous to the “cloud-gels” discussed in
Box 4.4. Systems incorporating suspended rod-like particles can serve as
“light valves” and can change their transparency, depending on whether
or not the particles are aligned in an electrical field [89].
90 Bleached Bleached
Colored Colored
80
Transmittance (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
35
30 PET PET
Reflectance (%)
TCO TCO
25 WOx NiO
PE PE
NiOx WOx
20 TCO TCO
PET PET
15
10
90
80
Absorptance (%)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
70
60
50
Transmittance (%)
40
30
20
10
500 1000 1500 2000
Time [s]
50
40
Transmittance (%)
30
20
10
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Time [s]
References
40. C. Genet, T.W. Ebbesen, Light in tiny holes, Nature 445 (2007)
39–46.
41. H. Gao, J. Henzie, T. W. Odom, Direct evidence for surface plasmon-
mediated enhanced light transmission through metallic nanohole
arrays, Nano Lett. 6 (2006) 2104–2108.
42. R. J. Leyrer, personal communication to one of the authors (GBS).
43. X. He, Y. Thomann, R. J. Leyrer, J. Rieger, Iridescent colors from
films made of polymeric core-shell particles, Polymer Bull. 57
(2006) 785–796; W. Wohlleben, F. W. Bartels, S. Altmann, J. R.
Leyrer, Mechano-optical octave-tunable elastic colloidal crystals
made from core-shell polymer beads with self-assembly techniques,
Langmuir 23 (2007) 2961–2969.
44. G. Mbise, G. B. Smith, G. A. Niklasson, C. G. Granqvist, Angular
selective window coatings: Theory and experiment, Proc. Soc.
Photo-Opt. Instrum. Engr. 1149 (1989) 179–199.
45. A. Roos, P. Polato, P. A. van Nijnatten, M. G. Hutchins, F. Olive, C.
Anderson, Angular-dependent optical properties of low-E and solar
control windows: Simulations versus measurements, Solar Energy
69 (supplement) (2000) 15–26.
46. I. R. Maestre, J. L. Molina, A. Roos, J. F. Coronel, A single-thin-film
model for the angle dependent optical properties of coated glazings,
Solar Energy 81 (2007) 969–976.
47. A. G. Dirks, H. J. Leamy, Columnar microstructures in vapor-depos-
ited thin films, Thin Solid Films 47 (1977) 219–233.
48. M. J. Brett, Simulation of structural transitions in thin films, J. Mater.
Sci. 24 (1989) 623–626.
49. J. J. Steele, M. J. Brett, Nanostructure engineering in porous colum-
nar thin films: Recent advances, J. Mater. Sci: Mater. Electron. 18
(2007) 367–379.
50. G. B. Smith, Theory of angular selective transmittance in oblique
columnar thin films containing metal and voids, Appl. Opt. 29
(1990) 3685–3693.
51. G. W. Mbise, D. Le Bellac, G. A. Niklasson, C. G. Granqvist, Angular
selective window coatings: Theory and experiments, J. Phys. D:
Appl. Phys. 30 (1997) 2103–2122.
52. C. M. Lampert, C. G. Granqvist, editors, Large-Area Chromogenics:
Materials and Devices for Transmittance Control, The International
Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, WA, 1990; Vol. IS4.
53. A. Georg, A. Georg, W. Graf, V. Wittwer, Switchable windows with
tungsten oxide, Vacuum 82 (2008) 730–735.
54. A. Roos, M.-L. Persson, W. Platzer, M. Köhl, Energy efficiency
of switchable glazing in office buildings, in Proceedings Glass
Processing Days, Tampere, Finland, 2005; pp. 566–569.
This chapter deals with devices for solar absorption that produce heat
(photothermal conversion in solar collectors) and electricity (photo-
electric conversion in solar cells). These devices can be building-inte-
grated on roofs, walls and even windows, and they can also be free
standing. Figure 6.1 shows some illustrative examples, specifically of
a solar collector installation (a), a wall essentially covered with solar
cells (b), and solar cells integrated in a wall glazing (c). The latter
example shows solar cells that are very well protected by the glazing,
but obviously these windows do not permit a good visual indoors–
outdoors contact. Both photothermal and photoelectric devices lead to
heating of the air around them, which then contributes to the urban
heat island effect in big cities (cf. Section 7.2). The focus of this chapter
is on nanostructural features of essential materials for applications to
heat and electricity.
Solar collectors for hot water production have been used at least since
the 1950s. Roof mounting is commonplace, and the collectors are ori-
ented to maximize the inflow of solar energy. Figure 6.2 shows the prin-
ciples of the flat plate collector comprising an absorber plate positioned
in a box which is thermally well insulated on the back and sides and has
a transparent cover—normally of glass—toward the sun. Obviously,
the glass should not absorb solar energy excessively, so it is preferable
that it has low iron content (cf. Figure 4.2) and is antireflection coated.
The absorber plate is thermally linked to a heat transfer medium that is
normally water; it goes through “riser” tubes and emerges heated at the
261
(a)
(b) (c)
Figure 6.1 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Photos
illustrating building-integrated devices for photothermal and pho-
toelectric conversion of solar energy. Panel (a) shows a roof-mounted
solar collector arrangement from Sweden, used to heat a number of pri-
vate houses; panel (b) is a solar-cell-covered façade at Solar-Fabrik in
Freiburg, Germany; and panel (c) is a solar cell installation forming an
architectural element on a building belonging to Fraunhofer Institute of
Solar Energy Systems in Freiburg, Germany.
Fluid out
Header
Risers
Cover
Absorber plate
Insulation
Fluid in
What are the desirable optical properties of the surface of the absorber
plate (i.e., of the surface that should absorb the impinging solar energy
and convert it into useful energy in a heat transfer medium)? This issue
was discussed at length in Chapter 2 but is repeated briefly here for
convenience. The primary requirement is that solar energy, at 0.3 < λ
< 3 μm, should be absorbed (i.e., Asol = 1); second, the absorbed energy
should not be reradiated as useless heat to the ambience so that thermal
emission, at 3 < λ < 50 μm, should be avoided (i.e., E therm = 0). Figure 6.3
emphasizes again that the overlap between solar and thermal proper-
ties is almost nil so that optimization in the two spectral ranges can
be achieved separately. The absorber is nontransparent, and hence the
desired spectral reflectance is
(GW/m3)
Blackbody
1.5 spectra
Solar spectrum (AM 1) (MW/m3)
1.0 +50°C 50
±0°C
0.5
0 0
1
Reflectance
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
Figure 6.3 The upper part shows a solar spectrum for one air mass
(AM1) and blackbody spectra for two temperatures. The lower part shows
reflectance for an idealized surface designed for absorbing solar energy
with minimum thermal loss. This figure is a companion to Figure 4.5.
say, Asol > 95% for normal incidence of the solar rays and E therm < 10%
for hemispherical thermal emission. The change of the optical properties
takes place at a “critical” wavelength λc that was put, somewhat arbi-
trarily, at 3 μm in Figure 6.3. This value of λc is good for applications
in which the heat transfer medium is not too hot (in practice < 100°C),
whereas the high temperatures needed in a thermal power station may
require λc ~ 2 μm or even shorter.
It is illustrative to show the effectiveness of the selective absorber
over the blackbody absorber via a calculation of the ratio of the energy
absorbed and retained by the two surfaces. This is done in Figure 6.4
for a concentration equal to unity (appropriate for a flat plate collector)
and for concentration of the solar energy by 10 times [4]. In the absence
of concentration and at room temperature, the blackbody absorber only
gives some 60% of the energy that is produced and retained by the ideal
selective absorber, and the blackbody absorber becomes practically use-
less at higher temperatures. For a solar concentration of 10 times, the
difference between the two types of surfaces is not at all as large at low
to moderate temperatures, and the difference is even less significant at
higher concentrations. Clearly, spectral selectivity is a key concept for the
regular flat plate solar collector, which is the design of most interest for
building integration. It may be less important in a highly concentrating
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7 X = 10
Fraction of Energy
0.6
0.5 X=1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 200 400
Absorber Temp. (°C)
Intrinsic Metal
selective material Dielectric
Substrate Metal
(a) (d)
2 µm
Antireflection coating
Silicon
Metal
Metal
(b) (e)
Dielectric SnO2 : F ,...
Metal
Dielectric Black enamel
Substrate Substrate
(c) (f )
100
1
80
3
Transmittance (%)
10
60
30
0
10
300
40
10 3
20
0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 100
Wavelength [µm]
The latter three items make it possible to decrease the coating thickness
to only a fraction of a micrometer in a coating for spectrally selective
solar absorption.
Surface roughness leads to other possibilities to create spectral selec-
tivity. If the surface has metallic protrusions separated by distances of
the order of the wavelengths for solar irradiation, this radiation will pen-
etrate into the structure and undergo multiple reflections and thereby
become absorbed, whereas radiation with longer wavelengths will not
“see” the surface as rough but as smooth and hence reflecting. These
500
250 750
[nm]
0 500
]
[nm
750 250
500
250
[nm] 0 0
(a)
100 100
e q
e q
e q
80 80 q
q
Reflectance (%)
Reflectance (%)
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
1 2 3 1 2 3
Wavelength [+m] Wavelength [+m]
(b) (c)
100
(a)
80
Asol
60
fCo ≈ 0.11
40
20 Etherm
0
100
(b)
80
Asol
60 fCo ≈ 0.23
Solar Absorptance and Thermal Emittance (%)
40
20 Etherm
0
100
(c)
80
Asol
fCo ≈ 0.40
60
40
Etherm
20
Ni substrate
0 Al substrate
100
(d)
80 Asol
fCo ≈ 0.60
60
Etherm
40
20 Co-Al2O3
Substrate
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Thickness (nm)
100
80
1
Reflectance (%)
60 1 + 2
1 + 2 + 3
40
70 nm Al2O3 3
70 nm Co-Al2O3 2
20 Ni substrate 1
fCo ≈ 0.60
0
0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
with regard to the surface normal. These data are shown in Figure
B6.1.3, where we also demonstrate the internal consistency of the
evaluations by plotting closely agreeing data as computed from the
complex dielectric function and as derived from angular depen-
dent spectral reflectance for s- and p-polarized light. It is seen that
the optimized design leads to Asol ≈ 95% at normal incidence, and
that this value does not fall off drastically until high angles are
reached. The slow drop at increasing angles obviously is favorably
for stationary solar collectors. E therm, on the other hand, is about
5% at small angles and rises gradually for increasing angles and
has a peak value of ~15% at θ ≈ 85°. This latter feature makes the
hemispherical value of E therm increase to ~7%, i.e., a by fraction
that is noticeable though not very prominent. Similar results for
Asol and E therm have been obtained for Ni-based coatings such as
those discussed next [6,12].
100
Asol
80
Computed
Thermal Emittance (%)
Solar Absorptance (%)
60
Measured
40
70 nm Al2O3
70 nm Co-Al2O3, fCo ≈ 0.6
20 Ni
Etherm
0
0 30 60 90
Angle (degrees)
1
Ni-Al2O3
0.8 Exp.
Ideal
Reflectance (%)
0.6
0.4
1
0.2 2
3
4
Al
0
1 10
Wavelength (µm)
100
80 Exp.
Ideal
Reflectance (%)
60
40
1
2
20 3
4
0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
100
80 Exp.
Ideal
Reflectance (%) 60
40
1
2
20 3
4
5
0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm)
100
Mo-Al2O3
80 Exp.
Ideal
Reflectance (%)
60
40 1
2
3
4
20 5
SS
0
1 10
Wavelength (µm)
100 100
Asol = 0.86 Asol = 0.81
80 Etherm = 0.04 80 Etherm = 0.06
Reflectance (%)
Reflectance (%)
60 60
575 nm
40 683 nm 40
20 20
0 0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm)
100 100
Asol = 0.92 Asol = 0.86
80 Etherm = 0.08 80 Etherm = 0.08
Reflectance (%)
Reflectance (%)
60 60
40 515 nm 40 463 nm
20 20
0 0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm)
Figure 6.12 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Spectral
reflectance for TiAlOxNy films made by sputter deposition onto Al.
Different colors (shown) were obtained by selecting film thicknesses
leading to reflectance maxima at the wavelengths shown in the luminous
wavelength range. Corresponding values of Asol and E therm are stated.
(From D. Zhu, S. Zhao, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells [2010] in press.
With permission.)
Figure 6.13 Cross section (left) and top view (right) of a thickness-
insensitive spectrally selective paint with Al flakes. (From B. Orel, pri-
vate communication [2009].)
solar absorbers, but the colors allow applications in situations for which
black surfaces may not be acceptable.
Selectively solar absorbing paints represent a low-cost alternative
to the coatings applied by other techniques. The paint formulations
typically contain a strongly absorbing pigment such as FeMnCuOx or
CuCr2O4 as well as highly reflecting metal flakes, typically of Al in a
polyurethane binder [23]. Figure 6.13 depicts a cross section and a top
view of such a coating. The flakes align more or less in parallel and serve
as “artificial low-emittance substrates” so that the optical properties are
thickness insensitive and independent of the substrate. In the absence
of metal flakes, the coating would have a thermal emittance typical for
the organic binder (i.e., E therm ≈ 90%). A proper paint formulation, how-
ever, leads to coatings with 80 < Asol < 90% and 30 < E therm < 40%.
Figure 6.14 shows typical reflectance spectra for three paint layers, and
demonstrates that spectral selectivity is at hand, though far from the
optimum. The samples are visibly colored and appear green, red, and
blue. Very recently, paint layers with self-cleaning properties have been
developed [24].
Solar cells, also called photovoltaic (PV) cells, convert solar energy into
electricity and are widely touted today (2009) as a technology for large-
scale electricity production. The efficiency of the solar cells is less than
that for converting solar energy into heat, but electrical energy, of course,
can be used for many more purposes than thermal energy. What is not
converted to electricity in the solar cell turns into heat, and solar cells
therefore become heated during operation. This heating tends to erode
100
red
80
Reflectance (%)
60
black
40
green
20
0
1 10
Wavelength (µm)
Figure 6.14 Spectral reflectance for visibly green, red, and blue layers
of thickness-insensitive spectrally selective paint. Corresponding values
of Asol /E therm are 84/36, 83/40, and 81/32%, respectively. (From B. Orel,
private communication [2009].)
generates a lot of heat and CO2 emissions, and this issue is so important
that it is specifically addressed for some emerging routes for solar cell
production. One possibility is to use concentrated solar radiation in the
melting and refinement process.
Below we first give a brief overview of solar cell types and then dis-
cuss how nano-features can boost the efficiency of silicon-based solar
cells and how nanotechnology leads to new types of solar cells, such as
dye-sensitized and organic cells.
282
Best Research-Cell Efficiencies Boeing-
Multijunction Concentrators Spectrolab
Three-junction (2-terminal, monolithic) (metamorphic)
40
Two-junction (2-terminal, monolithic)
Crystalline Si Cells Boeing-
NREL
Spectrolab
36 Single crystal (inverted, semi-mismatched)
Spectrolab
Multicrystalline
Thick Si film Japan
32 Energy
NREL/
Thin Film Technologies
NREL Spectrolab
Cu (In, Ga)Se2 NREL
28 CdTe
Amorphous Si:H (stabilized)
Nano-, micro-, poly-Si UNSW UNSW
Efficiency (%)
Spire
UNSW
24 Multijunction polycrystalline
Green Nanotechnology
UNSW NREL
Emerging PV Stanford UNSW Cu(In, Ga)Se2
Spire 14× concentration FhG-ISE
Dye cells Georgia Tech UNSW
20 Organic cells ARCO Sharp
Georgia Tech NREL NREL NREL NREL
(various Westing- Varian NREL
NREL Univ. Stuttgart Sharp
technologies) house University (large area)
16 No. Carolina NREL (45 µm thin-film
So. Florida AstroPower NREL transfer)
State Univ. NREL (small area)
ARCO Boeing Euro-CIS
NREL
Kodak Solarex Boeing (CdTe/CIS)
12 Boeing EPFL United
AMETEK Photon Energy Solar
Matsushita Sharp
United Solar Kaneka
Monosolar Kodak Boeing Solarex (2 µm on glass)
8
RCA NREL Konarka
Boeing Univ.Linz UCSB
University EPFL Groningen
4 of Maine RCA
RCA Siemens
RCA RCA
RCA RCA University Linz University
Linz
0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Figure 6.15 Best efficiency for research-type solar cells of a variety of kinds versus year when the results were presented. The
symbols have designations mentioning the laboratories responsible for the data; the symbols are joined by straight lines to guide the
eye. Acronyms used are NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, United States), UNSW (University of New South Wales,
Australia), FhG-ISE (Fraunhofer Institut für Solare Energiesysteme, Germany), EPFL (École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,
Switzerland), and UCSB (University of California–Santa Barbara). (After J. Berry, private communication [2009].)
Thermodynamic
80 limit
Efficiency, %
60
US$1.00/W
20
I US$3.50/W
II
Figure 6.16 Efficiency versus cost (in 2003 US$) for solar cell technolo-
gies belonging to generations I–III. (From M. A. Green, Third Generation
Photovoltaics: Advanced Solar Energy Conversion, Springer, Berlin,
Germany, 2003. With permission.)
– +
Dielectric
overcoating Ag islands Metal
SiO2
n+ p-Si p+
SiO2
Si
10
8
Enhancement
With Ag
6
With Ag+ZnS
4 Reference variation
0
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Wavelength (nm)
particles. These fields extend only a short distance, but if the particle
is close enough to a semiconductor layer whose thickness matches
the extent of the local field, then enhanced absorption becomes
possible in the semiconductor at wavelengths where transmittance
would normally take place. As noted above, charge transport is a
concern in such layers.
Incident light
Absorbing
dielectric waveguide
0.4
60 nm
40 nm
0.1
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
PV Layer Extinction Coefficient
Figure 6.19 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Absorption
induced in various thicknesses of very thin Si by neighboring Ag nano-
particles (peaked curves to right). The x-axis is the absorption coefficient
of the Si material. The particles themselves absorb according to the plots
with crosses. (From C. Hägglund, B. Kasemo, Opt. Express 17 [2009]
11944–11957. With permission.)
reliable technology for mass fabrication seems to be at hand (in 2010),
such statements must be regarded as tentative, at best.
Figure 6.20 is a schematic representation of the functional principles
of a DSSC [46]. A nanoporous and nanocrystalline oxide layer is at the
heart of the device. It is normally made of connected TiO2 anatase nano-
particles, but other oxides, such as ZnO and SnO2 , may be used, too.
The surfaces of the nanoparticles have an attached monolayer of a charge
transfer dye (“sensitizer”). When the latter is exposed to solar irradia-
tion, it is photo-excited to a state denoted S* in Figure 6.20, and an
electron is injected into the conduction band of the oxide. The original
state of the dye is then restored by electron donation from an electrolyte,
which normally is a liquid organic solvent containing the iodide ion/
triiodide ion (I – /I3 –) system. The regeneration of the sensitizer by iodide
intercepts the recapture of the conduction band electron by the oxidized
dye. The iodide, in its turn, is regenerated at the counter electrode (cath-
ode), which is usually Pt-coated glass, and the circuit is completed via
the external load. The voltage generated under illumination corresponds
to the difference between the Fermi level of the oxide and the redox
potential of the electrolyte, and electric power is generated without any
permanent chemical transformation.
The use of a liquid electrolyte is problematic from a device perspec-
tive, but it is possible to replace it—albeit then having a decrease in
Conducting
glass
TiO2 Dye Electrolyte Cathode
E (V) n
tio
jec S*
In
–0.5
Da
rk Maximum
0 cu
rre voltage
nt
hν
0.5 Red Ox
n
Electrolyte
tio
ep
Diffusion
erc
Int
1.0
S°/S+
Electron flow
Load
0.7 µm
(a) (b)
all of the solar absorption is in the dye, and very large research efforts
have gone into the development of dyes covering the solar spectrum, at
least for λ < 0.9 μm. Furthermore, the dye should be firmly grafted to the
TiO2 surface and inject electrons into the conduction band with a quan-
tum efficiency near unity and simultaneously be stable against degrada-
tion for long enough times. Dye development requires advanced organic
chemistry, and only some indications can be made here.
Polypyridyl complexes of ruthenium are particularly successful sen-
sitizers, with cis-RuL 2-(NCS)2 —where L stands for 2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-
dicarboxylic acid—is the premier sensitizer, known as the N3 dye. It
has been challenged by “black dye” more recently; this is tri(cyanato)-
2,2′,2′′-terpyridyl-4,4′,4′′-tri(carboxylate)Ru(II). Figure 6.22 shows the
spectral response of the photocurrent for DSSCs sensitized by N3 and
“black dye,” and it is apparent that the latter gives superior coverage of
the NIR and hence higher efficiency.
Plasmonic effects can increase the absorption in the dye and in prin-
ciple lead to larger efficiencies [50]. Nanoparticles of Ag or Au have
the desired plasmonic properties, but a problem with regard to DSSC
applications is that the I−/I3− system is extremely corrosive, even for Au.
A conceivable solution is to cover the nanoparticles with pinhole-free
TiO2 [51].
Another way to increase the efficiency is to increase the amount of
light trapping in the TiO2 , which can be made by adding scattering sub-
micron particles [44]. Clearly, this is the same strategy as the one used to
improve conventional thin-film solar cells via “milky” ZnO:Al transpar-
ent conductors (cf. Section 4.4.2). Figure 6.23 shows that when the haze
80
Black dye
60
N3
IPCE [%]
40
20
0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Wavelength [nm]
Organic solar cells (OSCs) attract much interest today as power sources,
primarily for non demanding applications. Their development has largely
paralleled that of OLEDs (cf. Section 5.6), which use similar chemicals
and structures. But it remains to be seen whether OSC development will
follow that of OLEDs, which are already commercial and growing in
importance. Possibilities to achieve very low-cost solar cells through
solution processing, as well as flexibility and light weight, are strong
technology drivers.
OSCs can be designed according to several different principles and
involve many types of materials, but so-called bulk heterojunctions com-
prised of a conjugated polymer blended with a fullerene derivative have
been widely studied recently, especially with regard to the system poly(3-
100
80
IPCE (%) 60
Haze 76%
40 Haze 60%
Haze 53%
Haze 36%
20 Haze 10%
Haze 3%
0
400 600 800 1000
Wavelength (nm)
Charge
separation
Charge
transport
Light
Exciton
generation
and diffusion
O
O
S S
S
P3HT PCBM
100 nm
60
Pristine
50 Annealed
40
IPCE (%)
30
20
10
References
303
the ambient without any need for external power, and they also empha-
size the great advantages of a clear sky over a cloudy sky. To understand
these ideas in a simple way, imagine for a moment that your eyes could
“see” in the infrared at night. Emerging from the earth would then be
all of the “IR colors” given off by most bodies at ambient temperature.
The radiation falling onto the earth from above, however, would look
distinctly different because one band of “color” that is very strong in
the outgoing radiation is weak and almost missing. This means that the
atmosphere is more or less unable to radiate some “colors” so a cooler
sky results. By the way, starlight would stand out with a distinct “color,”
as it is only for wavelengths where the incoming atmospheric radiation is
weak that IR “starlight” can easily get through to the earth’s surface.
Chapters 2 and 3 showed that it is the trace gases in the atmosphere
that cause these radiative properties; in particular the amounts of water,
CO2 , and ozone were found to be critical for getting the net outflow of
heat from the earth by thermal radiation just right for most forms of life.
We saw that the atmosphere is delicately tuned with regard to the amount
of radiant heat that gets through into space, and that much of this radia-
tion gets trapped and reradiated back to earth. The materials and struc-
tures discussed in this chapter are aimed at making maximum use of this
“sky window”—which is more “open” in dry geographic locations than
humid ones—while minimizing the impact of incoming radiation, which
includes both thermal radiation and daytime solar energy.
Cooling can be achieved by use of two classes of surfaces that are dis-
tinctly different with regard to function and relevant spectral range.
Thus, cooling can be accomplished by
The first class of surfaces reduces solar heat gains by increasing the
albedo (i.e., by reflecting an increased amount of solar energy). This
works for an individual building and vehicle as well as for a whole urban
environment. In particular, there are very great benefits if the surfaces
The second class of surface of main interest in this chapter pumps heat
away by radiative cooling to the atmosphere and dumps the heat into
space. The energy is removed directly by transmission through the sky
window and indirectly via absorption in the atmosphere and re-radia-
tion (about a third of which goes outward, as seen in Section 2.1). High
levels of cooling can be achieved with surfaces of this type as long as
there is no incident solar energy. But it is also possible to achieve useful
sky cooling in the daytime, though some special arrangements must then
be made as will be discussed later. A combination of high solar reflec-
tion and efficient sky cooling in one surface can lead to daytime cooling
and is thus of great relevance for this chapter; solar reflection keeps the
building cool, while sky cooling contributes to make its radiative output
surpass the solar heat gain so that subambient cooling starts earlier in
the afternoon than would be the case without sky cooling.
One can even go further with some surfaces designed for sky cool-
ing and combine heating and cooling in a single surface or single stacked
system having suitable spectral properties. This can be done sequentially
with daytime heating and night-time cooling but, most fascinating, is it
is even possible to simultaneously supply coolness and heat in a specially
designed single-stacked system. This idea can be varied to provide—
instead of the heat–cold combination—a joint supply of daylight and
cooling, or electric power and cooling.
To evaluate the benefits and relative costs of albedo increases, sky
cooling, and other novel cooling concepts, it is necessary to compare sav-
ings per dollar invested to that for advanced conventional systems and
other options for natural cooling. This is discussed further in Box 7.1.
The world’s population does not stop increasing. At the moment (2010),
it amounts to about 6.8 billon people, and it is not expected to stabilize
until after 2200 when the population is just above 10 billion [9]. More
than half of the population now lives in cities; 670 million inhabit the 100
largest cities, and the mean area per person is 560 m 2 [6]. Naturally, this
agglomeration of people and activities influences the cities’ climates.
33
Late Afternoon Temperature (°C)
32
31
30
Figure 7.2 Schematic of the urban heat island effect, showing tem-
perature rise for different types of urban landscape. (From http://www.
urbanheatislands.com. With permission.)
countryside. This is shown schematically in Figure 7.2, which indi-
cates that the temperature difference can be as large as ~4°C between
a downtown area with high-rise buildings and its rural setting.
Exceptionally, the energy increase can be even larger, and specific data
are available for a number of big cities [10]. This “urban heat island”
(UHI) effect has several reasons, the major ones being
For the specific case of Greater London, the air conditioning load was
estimated to be 25% above that of the surrounding rural region due to
the UHI effect [11].
As discussed above, increasing the albedos of roofs and roads will
lower the solar heat gain, and thereby the UHI. The reduced need for air
conditioning will lead to
that follow from raising the urban albedo by 0.1. A 10% reduction
in power station heat output worldwide—either from efficiency
gains, more gas power, replacement by renewables, or some combi-
nation of these—would offset the warming of nearly one extra Gt
of CO2 added to the atmosphere. To achieve an equivalent reduc-
tion from raised albedo would require lifting its average by a very
modest 0.0025! Note that, as in the example above of air condi-
tioning reductions, CO2 reductions from this combination of more
efficient power stations and renewables would continue to com-
pound year after year, and would surpass the 10% direct heating
offsets of ~1 Gt in 8 to 11 months. However, they would take over
10 years to surpass the benefits of raising average urban albedos
by 0.1! What is even more interesting is the relative financial ben-
efits, or return on investment, of the albedo approach versus the
renewables approach, both in terms of investment capital per ton
of CO2 reduction and relative accumulated returns over 10 years,
assuming a fixed price of CO2 per ton avoided or offset. These
financial considerations enhance the value of the albedo approach
even more.
Similar comparative analyses could be pursued in other exam-
ples applied to reductions of waste heat outputs from industrial
processes, especially from metal and ceramic processing, and from
vehicle exhaust emissions. The less heat pumped into the air, the
more CO2 can be added without a rise in temperature. The near-
to-medium term scope is thus probably up to 50 Gt of CO2 offsets,
with any further upside to come from the effect of an albedo rise
being too conservative.
The UHI effect is a growing problem. It not only detracts from the pleas
ure of being outside but actually compounds the demands on cooling
systems as hot air infiltration adds to cooling loads and also degrades
chiller efficiencies. The more heat derived from cooling one can pump
into outer space the better, which is why it is so important to make more
use of solar reflectance and sky cooling.
The air conditioning demand reaches a peak when the weather is
at its hottest, near midday or early afternoon. Then, wholesale electric
power gets very expensive, inefficient generators are fired up, and black-
outs ensue when demand exceeds supply. Power supply from solar cells
or solar thermal power stations is advantageous for this situation, as
their output peaks when the load maximizes and traditional power costs
are high. However, among all current options, it is even more energy
efficient and financially attractive to spread the load over time and use
conventional power stations at night for cooling. Chillers work more
efficiently at night, and one can further reduce demand by using supple-
mentary night sky cooling. A number of state-of-the-art air conditioning
systems cool glycol-water mixtures to near ice temperature overnight
and then use the stored cold fluid the next day in various ways such
as to cool overhead beams. The cooled thermal mass of the building
can involve using interior walls or floors, columns or beams filled with
chilled water-glycol, or suitably located phase change materials. The lat-
ter can be micro-encapsulated waxes. Greater use of night cooling with
conventional compressors plus storage is thus to be encouraged. This
also opens the way for hybrid operation with advanced night sky cool-
ing systems. These do not seem to have been considered before, but have
much to offer. They will reduce compressor power needs and also pump
much of the exhaust heat into space instead of into nearby air. Such
hybrid systems are well suited to both large buildings and to homes.
The sky cooling devices introduced in Section 7.4 may also be applicable
in homes for collecting and storing cold fluid overnight to fully supply
cooling needs the next day. The implication is that if cooling loads in
homes are not too high—which presumes good design—these systems
could completely eliminate the need for electrically powered cooling,
apart from a small amount of power for fans or pumps.
Other sources of natural cooling also need to be considered in
buildings, including natural ventilation, cool underground soil, and
evaporative cooling. In some parts of the world, snow and ice can be
accumulated during the winter and used for cooling during the summer.
But ultimately these sources still pump heat or water vapor into the local
environment, just as electrically powered cooling does. Night sky cool-
ing avoids this.
heat gains. Both coatings and insulation materials are of importance for
improving the energy efficiency.
Chapters 4 and 5 demonstrated that windows and luminaires are sig-
nificant elements for the façade’s impact on the internal energy demand.
These are important for the building’s apertures but, of course, the
opaque parts of the building envelope matter very much, too, and, as we
will discuss here, new types of paints have much to offer and can be as
significant as good thermal insulation. Furthermore, as explained earlier
in this chapter, improved roof coatings can contribute substantially to
raising the urban albedo and hence offset large amounts of added CO2 ,
as well as contribute to demand savings and create nicer microclimates.
For a given color of the paint, different combinations of selective
coatings and insulation may yield the same overall improvement of the
thermal performance of a wall or roof of a building in a given geo-
graphic location. Therefore, the final decision of what paint to actually
use will come down to relative costs, availability of the different options,
aesthetic appeal, ease of application and installation, and whether the
building is under construction or being retrofitted. Routine maintenance
of painted surfaces may provide an opportunity for easy improvement
in performance once the technologies and approaches we address here
become more widely available or lower in cost. The number of white and
colored paint products being marketed as “solar” or “sun reflecting” has
increased greatly in recent times as people are becoming more interested
in green technology and aware that solar and thermal control can yield
large energy savings.
A surface having a neutral color can range from very bright white with
Asol ~ 10%, through dull white and light gray with Asol between 40 and
60%, to near black with Asol ~ 90%. So, whitish-looking surfaces are not
necessarily very good solar reflectors and may absorb as much as half of
the incident solar energy in some cases. Also, dull white solar irradiated
surfaces with Asol ≈ 50% can get hot and yield significant internal heat
transfer to whatever is thermally connected to such a surface.
It is not uncommon that roofs reach 60°C to 75°C under clear skies,
so it is easily realized that roofs should have high solar reflectance com-
bined with high thermal emittance, at least for warm and hot climates.
The high emittance not only helps keep down daytime temperatures on
roofs and walls but allows the roof, and often the interior and building
mass, to cool to a temperature a few degrees below that of the ambient
at night. With highly solar reflecting roofs and walls it can take some
time after sunrise to overcome the stored coolness. This type of spectral
30
25
20
15
10
May-07
May-08
Jul-06
Aug-06
Sep-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Dec-06
Jan-07
Feb-07
Mar-07
Apr-07
Jun-07
Jul-07
Aug-07
Sep-07
Oct-07
Nov-07
Dec-07
Jan-08
Feb-08
Mar-08
Apr-08
Jun-08
Jul-08
Figure B7.3.1 Air conditioning power usage in two almost
identical nearby supermarkets near Brisbane, Australia, during
a 1.5-year-long measurement campaign. Upper and lower curves
refer to buildings having standard external finish and coated with
“cool” paint, respectively. (From J. Bell et al., Proceedings CD and
Summary Book of the CIB International Conference on Smart and
Sustainable Built Environment, Brisbane, Australia, [November
19–21, 2003] [ISBN: 1-74107-040-6]; Paper T606.)
the installation of the cooling unit and how it is operated, the way
internal air exchange occurs, and the roof and ceiling insulation.
The conclusion is that the very large savings evident from Figure
B7.3.1 may not always occur, but at least half of the shown savings
can be expected in most cases.
Figure B7.3.2 reports additional data demonstrating the large
impact of a “cool” roof finish, here applied to a newspaper office/
production facility [20]. When a standard roof material was used,
the temperature frequently reached 50°C to 70°C. Replacing this
material with a “cool” white paint led to a very significant decrease
in the roof temperature: the temperature difference was ~17°C on
average and was exceptionally as large as ~25°C.
80
70
60
Temperature (°C)
50
Plain roof
40
SkyCool roof
30
20 Ambient
Before application After application
10
1/11/2007
3/11/2007
5/11/2007
7/11/2007
9/11/2007
11/11/2007
13/11/2007
15/11/2007
17/11/2007
19/11/2007
21/11/2007
23/11/2007
25/11/2007
27/11/2007
29/11/2007
1/12/2007
3/12/2007
5/12/2007
7/12/2007
9/12/2007
11/12/2007
13/12/2007
15/12/2007
17/12/2007
19/12/2007
21/12/2007
23/12/2007
25/12/2007
27/12/2007
29/12/2007
31/12/2007
2/01/2008
4/01/2008
6/01/2008
8/01/2008
10/01/2008
12/01/2008
that is, 52% of the reflectance is in the infrared. This shows that high
solar reflectance can only be obtained if the NIR reflectance is very large.
And if a distinct color is required, not just a pale one, then the luminous
reflectance should be confined to a narrow band. The latter feature can
be achieved with certain dyes, select pigments which may incorporate
nanofeatures, and some nanoparticles.
The ideal colored “cool” paint for warm or hot climates would thus
have, neglecting the UV, a maximum solar reflectance of 0.43R H,lum +
0.52. Thus, a black paint with R H,lum ~ 0.05 could still have R H,sol as
high as 0.55. But a conventional carbon black coating can achieve R H,sol
~ 0.06 at best. It then follows that a black roof, wall, or car body that
100
90
80
Transmittance [%]
Lumogenblack
·
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 Carbon black
0
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Wavelength [nm]
UV Visible Near infrared (NIR)
reflects most of the NIR reflects almost ten times more solar energy than
a conventional black paint! This qualitative difference can lead to large
reductions in roof temperatures, from ~65°C to around 35°C, with ensu-
ing lower internal heat gains.
Figure 7.3 shows transmittance spectra of a “cool” black paint and
of a normal black paint based on carbon [21]. The “cool” paint is trans-
parent in the NIR and, if it is applied to a reflecting backing, the reflec-
tance spectrum corresponds to the transmittance spectrum of a coating
at double thickness. The conventional black, on the other hand, has a
low reflectance throughout the spectral range shown.
The data in Figure 7.3 do not extend beyond 1.2 μm in wavelength.
Most of the NIR solar energy lies at 0.7 < λ < 1.2 μm, so it is most impor-
tant that the reflectance is high in this range. Nevertheless, the optical
properties are of some interest also at longer wavelengths, since many
pigments and binders may have absorption features there. Figure 7.4
shows specific examples of “cool light brown” and “cool green” paints
[22]. Both paints have optical properties in good agreement with those
for their standard counterparts within the luminous range. Clearly,
the brown paint reflects moderately well in the entire NIR spectrum,
whereas the green paint displays unwanted low reflectance for 1.2 < λ
< 1.8 μm.
40
80
Reflectance (%)
40
20
0
300 800 1300 1800 2300
Wavelength [nm]
Figure 7.4 Spectral luminous and NIR reflectance for two “cool” col-
ored paints and for their standard counterparts. (From A. Synnefa et al.,
Solar Energy 81 [2007] 488–497. With permission.)
white and colored paints with opposite infrared properties are of inter-
est for surfaces inside rooms, and they can reduce inward heat flows
from hot walls and roofs; these paints require a low emittance. Thus,
ideal paints for indoor and outdoor applications have radically different
thermal properties.
Oxide-coated metal flakes can be used for “cool” paints. Aluminum
flakes are added to a transparent binder to create a paint coating with a
cross section as illustrated in Figure 7.5a. Such paints would be neutral
in color and highly solar reflecting. A variety of colors can be accom-
plished by having each flake coated with an oxide of precisely controlled
thickness in the nano range, as seen in Figure 7.5b. The visual impres-
sion is created by optical interference, and different oxide thicknesses
in the range between 20 and 200 nm lead to a variety of colors. The
thin-oxide layers are largely transparent in the NIR, so reflection in that
range occurs from the Al flake. In practice, the coatings are produced
in a hot fluidized bed reactor using an iron-containing organometallic
compound so that each flake is coated with iron oxide [23,24].
A single-layer coating on the Al flakes gives colors which look similar
from most directions. With double layers, however, the perceived color
Clear topcoat
Oxide
coated flakes
Initial coat
Metal substrate
(a)
(b)
5
4 nm
8 nm
4
12 nm
Cross-Sections
2 nm
2
18 nm
0
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
Wavelength [+m]
(a)
12
No coat
10 2 nm 4 nm
6 nm
8 10 nm
Cross-Section
0
0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
Wavelength [µm]
(b)
“Active” means cooling and storing cold fluids, or hybrid integration into
active systems such as directly in the condenser circuits of normal chillers
or indirectly to improve external heat removal. An additional potential
that is not often considered is for electric power supply side, as discussed
later in Section 7.6. Cooling is needed in all electric power systems, as
outlined in Box 2.2, and this adds directly to global warming; sky cool-
ing can have major implications for which renewable sources to use and
where to locate them. Water collection from the atmosphere, and as an
aid to water condensation in distillation, is still another area where sky
cooling will have an impact [27]; this is discussed in Section 7.5.
But before one embarks on active sky cooling to maintain comfort-
able interiors in buildings, the base cooling load should be minimized by
having good thermal insulation, appropriate roof and façade technologies
(such as high-albedo paints, as discussed above), and advanced fenestra-
tion as discussed in Chapter 4. The overall design is also essential for new
or renovated buildings. Indeed, substantial reductions in cooling loads
can be obtained by diminishing direct and indirect gains from solar irra-
diation, and if this is done well, the desired cooling can be accomplished
by use of moderate areas for emitting radiation to the sky.
Why has the great potential of sky cooling not been successfully
exploited to date, despite our ready access to it? First, it is not a widely
understood or appreciated field, and few scientists are active in it. But
more important, there has been little effort to develop products based
on sky cooling, possibly apart from arrangements for water collection.
The diverse technological scope beyond these applications is not well
understood, and this “knowledge gap” has yet to be bridged.
Clearly, the field of sky cooling has so far fallen short of its potential
by a wide margin, but it has too much to offer to be neglected. Thus,
practical cooling at a low cost down to 15°C below the coldest ambient
temperature of the night has been demonstrated, and we will discuss
how even lower temperatures are achievable.
326
10
10
90°
Water vapor [cm]
75° 1.5
8 3
Radiance [MW(Sr–1)m–3]
6
Radiance [MW(Sr–1)m–3]
Blackbody
60° 6
5
Green Nanotechnology
0° 4
0
0
5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25
Wavelength [µm] Wavelength [µm]
(a) (b)
10 Spectral radiance for a clear mid-latitude summer sky at different zenith angles including the vertical and
Figure 7.7
the horizontal (part a) and spectralWater
zenith radiance
vapor [cm] from clear skies containing different amounts of precipitable water
(part b). (Part a from Berdahl, R. Fromberg,1.5 Solar Energy 29 [1982] 299–314. With permission. Part b from P. Berdahl,
M. Martin,8Proceedings of the Second National
3 Passive Solar Conference, edited by D. Prowler, I. Duncan, B. Bennett,
Radiance [MW(Sr–1)m–3]
American Section of the International Solar 6 Energy Society, Newark, DE [1978], Vol. 2, pp. 684–686, as replotted in
Blackbody
C. G. Granqvist, A. Hjortsberg, J. Appl. Phys. 52 [1981] 4205–4220. With permission.)
6
When surfaces are exposed to the sky, they can experience cooling due
to a net loss of thermal radiation. This means that the thermal radiation
given off by the surface has to be larger than that coming in from the
atmosphere (and possibly other surrounding surfaces) and is absorbed,
rather than being reflected or transmitted. And absorption of incom-
ing radiation reduces the cooling potential. The incident radiation is
largely beyond our control, but it is possible to control how much of it is
absorbed, provided that we understand the spectral and angular distri-
bution of the sky radiance. This was discussed in the previous section.
The technologies addressed here aim to maximize the net radiative out-
put, which is the difference between the outgoing and the absorbed part
of the incoming radiation, and it is very instructive to consider outgoing
and incoming radiation relative to each other when the goal is to cool to
subambient temperatures. Cooling of hot objects, on the other hand, is
a lot different as the incoming radiation is then much weaker, relatively
speaking. A number of strategies for maximizing the difference will be
introduced, but the main emphasis is on the spectral properties of the
emitting surface.
Section 2.7 outlined the basic physics of thermal radiation from
surfaces at finite temperatures and especially introduced the blackbody
radiator, which emits with a spectral power density given by P(λ,τ). This
35 1
E (Black body)
30
Intensity (W/m2/µm) 0.8
25
Emittance
20 0.6
Planck spectrum 290 K
15
0.4
10
E (“Ideal” sky emitter) 0.2
5
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Wavelength [µm]
We will first consider various surfaces open to the sky and then surfaces
under practical covers designed so as to limit convection gains but trans-
mit most of the radiated heat. Suitable cover materials were introduced
in Section 3.5. The net radiated power Prad without covers is given by
π /2 ∞
Prad =
0
∫ ∫
d (sin θz ) d λP(λ, τ s )Es (θz , λ)
2
0
(7.3)
π /2 ∞
0
∫ 0
∫
− d (sin θz ) d λP(λ, τ a )Ea (θz , λ)Es (θz , λ)
2
fixed and the first term falls with increasing τs this balance gradually
shifts toward minimizing the second term. Thus, the preferred practical
spectrum depends on how far τs needs to be below ambient temperature.
The humidity also plays a significant role, as expected from Figure 7.7b.
Interestingly, the drier the atmosphere, the more the balance is shifted
toward broadband “blackish” emitters. This may seem counter-intuitive
but arises because the second term in Equation 7.3 is then weaker for all
surfaces, and hence it takes a lower magnitude of τs for the sky window
emitters to be superior. This influence of humidity is one example of a
broader principle that will come up again soon, namely, external factors
that act to reduce the incoming radiation enhance the relative merits of
a blackbody to those of a spectrally selective emitter.
A number of results based on Equation 7.3 have been presented in
the past for ideal and blackbody surfaces. The detailed results depend on
the model of the atmosphere. Figure 7.9 shows data from an application
of this model to both the blackbody and the ideal sky window emitting
surface of Figure 7.8 for hemispherical radiation in the case of various
climate zones ranging from tropical to very dry [32]. The highest cooling
performance occurs for the “U.S. standard atmosphere,” for which the
precipitable water is as small as 1.83 mm. The plots then steadily shift
down as humidity levels rise. A key result is that the ideal spectrally selec-
tive emitter can achieve, in the absence of nonradiative heat gains, much
lower stagnation temperatures than the blackbody. It will get to 50°C to
60°C below ambient temperature, while the blackbody reaches only 25°C
to 30°C. For temperatures above 10°C below ambient, the blackbody
is pumping more heat radiatively because the output term in Equation
7.3 then dominates, but by 15°C below ambient, the spectrally selective
radiator is superior because the input term is then much more important.
Nonradiative heat gains, which input heat according to Pnr = Unr(τa − τs),
where Unr is a constant, limit practical stagnation. The common line in
Figure 7.9 is for a very well-insulated system with Unr = 1 Wm−2K−1. The
stagnation points occur when Prad = Pnr. Average values of (τa − τs,min) for
both types of surfaces are closer together when Unr has a nonzero value,
but the spectrally selective surface still cools further by around 8°C to
10°C. The low-cost practical systems in the following have Unr values
that are higher and lie at 2 to 2.5 Wm−2K−1, so stagnation temperatures
around 15°C below the ambient are their limits. In this case, the spec-
trally selective surface still achieves a lower value of τs,min, but the black-
body reaches a temperature that is only two or three degrees higher.
Infrared transparent convection covers are needed in practice for
achieving a low value of Unr. This cover has a moderate impact on the sec-
ond term in Equation 7.3, but it does not influence the first term since the
power density leaving the surface depends only on τs. To find the incom-
ing power density before absorption one must replace P(λ,τa)E a(θz,λ) in
120
Hemispherical radiance:
100 TROP
MS
80 MW
SS
60 Blackbody SW
surface US STD
40
Radiated Power, Prad [Wm–2]
20
0
10 20 30
100
80
Infrared-selective
60 surface
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Temperature Difference [ºC]
temperature, so one can assume that any slight tendency it has to warm
due to (weak) absorption of radiation emitted from the surface of inter-
est can be neglected.
Section 3.5 introduced ionic and molecular absorption processes that can
yield narrow absorption bands in the sky window range. The absorption
can ensue from the natural ionic or molecular vibration modes in some
materials comprised of light atoms including Si, Al, Mg, C, N, and O.
Practical experiments have been conducted on thin films of materials such
as silicon monoxide [31,33], silicon nitride [34], and silicon oxynitride
[35,36]. Other alternatives include a number of polymer layers (with poly
vinyl fluoride being especially good [15,37]) and layers of MgO and LiF
[38], as well as gaseous ammonia, ethylene, and ethylene oxide [39,40].
These materials yield little absorption across the Planck spectrum lying
outside the sky window range, and the desired selective reflectance pro-
file can be approximately reached provided that the thin-film or polymer
layer has an adequate thickness and is backed by a highly reflecting metal
such as an aluminum film. Some selectivity can be achieved also with
anodized alumina [41,42] and with alumina films [43], but the data are
not as good as for the previously mentioned alternatives.
Figure 7.10a illustrates spectral reflectance for an optimized silicon
oxynitride film [36]. High absorption in the sky window is due to molecu-
lar vibrations in tetrahedrally coordinated SiO4, SiO3N, SiO2N2 , SiON3,
and SiN4 structural units [36], and the high reflectance outside this win-
dow is caused by the underlying Al. Figure 7.10b shows spectral reflectance
of a thick ceramic MgO layer backed by metal [38]; the large reflectance
at λ > 13 μm is due to the Reststrahlen effect (cf. Section 3.5).
100
Reflectance (%) 80
60
40
20
0
5 7 10 20 50
Wavelength [µm]
(a)
100
80
Reflectance (%)
60
40
20
0
5 8 13 20 30 40
Wavelength [µm]
(b)
ω T2 (2ε h ) + ω 2Lε(∞)
ω 2 SPR = (7.4)
2ε h + ε(∞)
(a) 1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Transmittance
0.6
0.5
0.4 SiO2 nanoparticles
0.3 in PE
0.2
0.1
0
5 10 15 20 25 30
Wavelength [µm]
(b) 1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Transmittance
0.6
0.5
a-SiC nanoparticles
0.4 in PE
0.3
0.2
1.0
0.8
Reflectance
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
5
6 80 90
7
8 60 70
Wav 9 40 50 ce [°
]
elength 10 11 20 30
n c iden
[µm] I
12 10 le of
13 0 Ang
Figure 7.12 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Spectral
and angular-dependent reflectance for nanoparticles of SiO2 and c-SiC
embedded in polyethylene foil. (From A. R. Gentle, G. B. Smith, Nano
Lett. 10 [2010] 373–379. With permission.)
There are many design issues to consider when setting up practical sky
cooling devices. Among those already discussed we note local atmospheric
80
Scattering (due to
Sky window
Scattering nanoparticle clusters)
70
60
Specular Reflectance [%]
50
Dense silicon
40 monoxide
Second SiO2
30 resonance
20
SiO2 nanoparticle
10
surface phonon
resonance
0
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24
Wavelength [µm]
Coating IR transparent
cover (10 µm PE)
Insulation
20
15
Air temperature
10
Temperature [°C]
High emittance/
5 solar reflecting
–5
Selective
–10
Time
the polyethylene cover, condenses and forms ice; the cooling power is
then needed for the phase change. Once the water has condensed as ice,
it has no obvious effect on the cooling performance.
Figure 7.16 proves that net cooling prevails during the day. The
increase in temperature after sunrise mirrors the drop in net cooling
rate due to the onset of diffuse solar influx. Some sharp but short-lived
temperature peaks at night arise when clouds pass over and add some
incoming radiation. The cooling surface then responds rapidly to the
cloud cover and finds a new steady-state temperature.
The cooling devices giving the data in Figure 7.16 had a nonradi-
ative heat transfer as large as 2.5 to 3 Wm−2K−1. Scaling up and bet-
ter insulation should enable 2 Wm−2K−1 or less, and hence even lower
temperatures. Nevertheless, the transparent cover remains a significant
challenge as elaborated in Box 7.4.
Much further engineering development of sky cooling systems and
their interface with storage or other devices is clearly needed. However,
the potential for easily implemented, low-cost cooling for a variety of
applications is beyond doubt. We believe that sky cooling technology
will become increasingly important and possibly emerge as a centerpiece
for tackling a variety of environmental and lifestyle challenges that the
world will face in coming years.
Box 7.4 Transparent Convection
Shields for Sky Coolers
Sky radiators reaching temperatures well below those of the ambi-
ence need good thermal insulation. This is easy for nontransparent
parts of the cooling device but a challenge for the upward-facing
part, which should transmit radiation at least in the 8 < λ < 13 μm
range while providing small non-radiative heat transfer, compris-
ing conduction and convection. The conductive component is rela-
tively straightforward and requires a sufficient distance between
the radiating surface and the shield. At first sight, the convection
might seem easy too for the case of a horizontal device, and one
could hope for a stagnant gas layer that is coldest at the bottom. In
reality, this is a problem, though, since wind blowing past the con-
vection shield will move it—as long as it is a thin foil or a series of
foils—so that forced convection transfers heat to the radiating sur-
face. The convection shield hence must have mechanical rigidity.
A first attempt at developing a material with the properties required
for sky cooling is illustrated in Figure B7.4.1. It shows a three-dimen-
sional material consisting of crossed layers of vee-corrugated high-
density polyethylene foils [52]. Measurements on a typical material
consisting of three components, each with a height h of 1.5 cm and
an apex angle θa of 45°, yielded Unr ≈ 0.9 Wm−2K−1, together with an
infrared transmittance (measured with an IR-imaging instrument) of
73%. The result is encouraging for further materials development,
which might involve other types of polymers in alternative configu-
rations, as well as fiber-based reinforcement. Thus, the transparent
convection shield is not an Achilles’ heel for sky cooling, but it is
definitely a material in need of more development!
h
Θa
Spectral and angular selectivity are not the only strategies to reduce
incoming atmospheric radiation and hence amplifying the net radiative
output of a surface exposed to the sky. If part of the sky vault seen by the
emitter is replaced by a surface with much lower emittance than the sky
in that zone, then the incoming radiation from those solid angles must be
lower. The effect is as though the whole sky, on average, got a lot colder
[53]. The sky is most “black” at high angles to the zenith and most trans-
parent toward the zenith, so the obvious choice is to surround the emit-
ting surface with a heat mirror that leaves open a reasonable-size aperture
around the zenith direction. The heat mirrors must have a low emittance
in order to maximize this benefit, and thus can be made of bare aluminum
or a metallized surface (e.g., silver) with a thin protective oxide layer over
the metal. Such surfaces can have an emittance between 0.02 and 0.1,
whereas the sky at high zenith angles has an emittance approaching unity.
Figure 7.17 illustrates a few practical heat mirror arrangements for boost-
ing sky cooling. Some of these structures have features in common with
solar concentrators used, for example, in solar thermal power plants.
The optical design does not have to be particularly rigorous in order
to provide strong gains, and thus the structures can be low cost. But
it is important that the optical design ensures that incoming near-hor-
izontal rays are not reflected so that they reach the emitting surface.
An acceptance angle, denoted θz,max for the case of a radially symmetric
heat mirror, defines what radiation gets in and must exclude rays from
θz,max < θz < 90°. All emitted radiation, apart from what the heat mirror
absorbs, gets out. The incoming radiation is now strongly attenuated, so
one expects net cooling gains and lower stagnation temperatures than in
the absence of heat mirror arrangements.
Which type of radiator benefits most from a heat mirror arrange-
ment: the broad-band absorber with high emittance or the sky window
Enclosed
cone
Parabola
Low emittance
or CPC
surfaces
Radiative coating
Sky window selective
or high emittance
Figure 7.17 Structures with heat mirrors blocking some or all of the
atmospheric radiation emerging from large zenith angles.
selective emitter with intermediate emittance? In other words, does
the evaluation regarding the benefits of the two types of surfaces in
Figure 7.9 change when angular restrictions are included in the analysis?
It is easy to model Prad with mirrors, which we will do, but some reason-
ing can also tell what will happen: the net output from the blackbody
falls off most rapidly as τs goes down, as seen in Figure 7.9, because this
surface absorbs most of the incoming radiation. Thus, the blackbody
stands to benefit most from using heat mirrors. Calculations of Prad for
an aperture that is symmetric about the zenith direction can be made by
replacing Equation 7.3 with
π /2 ∞
0
∫ 0
∫
Prad = d (sin2 θz ) d λP(λ, τ s )Es (θz , λ) −
θz ,max ∞
0
∫ ∫
d (sin θz ) d λP(λ, τ a )Ea (θz , λ)Es (θz , λ) −
2
0
(7.5)
π /2 ∞
∫
θz ,max
∫
d (sin θz ) d λP(λ, τ a )Em (θz , λ)Es (θz , λ)
2
0
100
oSX (45°)
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
oa–os [°C]
Figure 7.18 Net radiative cooling power for ideal blackbody and
infrared selective surfaces exposed to the U.S. standard atmosphere
under condition so that the acceptance angle is limited to 45° and for
free exposure to the sky. The triangles on the vertical axis indicate cool-
ing powers for surfaces with non-ideal properties as discussed in the
main text. (From G. B. Smith, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 93 [2009]
1696–1701. With permission.)
13 μm range and 0.90 outside this range along with θz,min = 45°. Cooling
curves emanating from these triangles will run almost in parallel with
the pertinent curves for ideal surfaces.
The main result of Figure 7.18 is the prediction that a device with
a blackbody-like emitter and with highly reflecting surfaces confining
the radiative exchange to an angular range around the zenith direction
can lead to a very large cooling power and to temperatures lying far
below those of the ambience. For example, with Unr = 2 Wm−2K−1 one can
remove heat at 20°C below ambient temperature at 60 to 70 Wm−2 .
Sky cooling can function both night and day. Cooling during the night
is most effective, but there are many possibilities to combine this with
cooling also in the day (though at a lower rate than in the night), heating
in the day (or during winter), daylight transmission, and photovoltaic
energy generation. Thus, it is of interest to consider the impact of solar
irradiance on sky cooling.
Even if night cooling is the sole concern, it is worthwhile to limit
solar heating during the day. This is so because the entire cooling device
might heat up, and then there is a surplus of energy that takes time
to remove by sky cooling before subambient temperatures are reached.
There are a number of ways to limit the solar heating: The simplest
may be to totally close off the system, or to put it away if it is portable.
Secondly, the cooling surface itself may combine its desirable IR prop-
erties with high solar reflectance or transmittance. A third approach,
which may be the best for most practical cooling devices, is to have a
convection-suppressing shield that reflects or back scatters solar radia-
tion while it transmits in the thermal infrared. Microparticles of ZnS
can be effective for the latter purpose, as we will see below in the dis-
cussion about foils for water condensation. Another option is nanosized
TiO2 incorporated in polyethylene [54].
It is now becoming clear that useful net heat pumping is possible
during the day, provided that the impacts of daytime solar radiation
are managed. It is very difficult to achieve net cooling in the presence of
direct solar irradiation, though it is physically possible in principle with
materials that have very small solar absorption and very large radia-
tion output. One such material might be sheet glass in which the iron
content is almost zero (cf. Figure 4.2). To have a worthwhile net cooling
all day or most of the day in direct sun, a rough guide is that the solar
heating of the cooling surface should be less than 40 Wm−2 . This means
a solar absorptance less than ~8%, along with high emittance across
the sky window. These properties are possible but may be difficult to
where Lw = 2.26 × 106 Jkg−1 is the latent heat of water vaporization, that
is, the heat that must be pumped away each second to condense 1 kg of
water. For an open surface, RdLw depends on the convective exchange
between the air away from the surface and that near the radiating sur-
face. This is governed by differences in vapor pressures, which are higher
at τa than at τs, plus the convective exchange part of Unr according to
relations that are well known in atmospheric science [57]. The perti-
nent equations must be solved iteratively together with Equation 7.6 to
determine self consistently both τs and Rd for the particular relationship
between Prad and τs for a given experimental set-up.
Figure 7.19 shows nightly collected dew in Dodoma, Tanzania, ver-
sus relative humidity [58,59]. Both data sets are based on a very simple
system comprised of a 0.4-mm-thick polyethylene foil containing 15
vol.% of ZnS pigment. The solar reflectance was ~85 %, and the emit-
tance in the sky window was high as a consequence of the ZnS [18]. The
0.20
Clouds 0/8–1/8
0.10
0.05
0.00
70 75 80 85 90 95
Relative Humidity at 06:00 [%]
Today’s power stations place great thermal and water resource burdens
on the environment. Cooling is an essential aspect of thermally driven
generation of electricity, and cooling towers are stark visual reminders
of this need. If local lakes and rivers are employed for cooling, the con-
sequence is degradation of the environment and reduction of natural
water flows for irrigation or human use. It is a fundamental aspect of
thermodynamics, as outlined in Chapter 2, that for engines utilizing
heat input at temperature τh the useful work available to drive a turbine
and produce power depends on the temperature τc at which the waste
heat is exhausted. The maximum available power is given by the Carnot
efficiency [1 − τc /τh]. Practical, or irreversible, heat engines have more
realistically efficiencies of around [1 − (τc /τh)1/2] [66], with the rate at
which heat can be exhausted by cooling having an important influence
on this efficiency. Thus, for every GW of normal electric power with τc
lying near the ambient temperature, around 1.8 GW of heat has to be
exhausted, often as saturated air at around 35°C.
Many emerging concepts for large-scale, low-cost renewable power
exploit vast thermal resources with lower temperatures than those
for the usual power stations. When differences between τh and τc are
small—as for power generation in OTEC (cf. Section 2.10), salt gradient
solar ponds and solar chimneys—low efficiencies for conversion of heat
to mechanical work must thus result. But if the natural energy resource
is large enough and free at both input and output, these systems never-
theless are very attractive. Furthermore, the source of coolness is differ-
ent from the local ambient, which is a significant aspect. Any thermal
power system operating at τh below ~170°C can benefit significantly in
efficiency by having τc fall from, say, τc > 25°C, which would be typi-
cal for cooling by air or water, to a temperature of 5°C to 10°C. Such a
decrease of τc is achievable, and a number of power systems with such
characteristics are now projected.
Waste heat from conventional power stations and industries, using
high-temperature processes, can also be tapped for additional power.
Power from waste heat requires turbines working at low temperatures,
so cooling can add significantly to the power output. A viable and con-
servative goal for the world could be up to 1,000 TWh of power per
annum from a fraction of such resources operating at 10 to 15% con-
version efficiency. Costs will depend on the specific type of source but
should undercut solar thermal power generation if sufficient efforts are
put into their design. Savings in CO2 emissions would be up to 1 Gt
per annum. Thus, designers of new large-scale power stations, found-
ries, kilns, and steel plants should considering incorporating waste heat
capture into plant design for subsequent use in power production. Such
features are easier and much cheaper if they are put it in at the outset
rather than as add-ons later. The associated carbon credits would also
help offset the carbon liabilities for normal operation and hence add to
the economic viability of such additions.
Cooling, if sufficiently cheap and simple, can also be a useful adjunct
for boosting the output from renewable power systems, especially ther-
mal systems operating at low temperatures. Solar thermal power gen-
eration with an input temperature τh in the range 80°C to 100°C could
have a boost in efficiency of 50% to 100% if the engine condensation
cycle is done with coolness collected via sky cooling. This idea, which
could provide very low-cost power, is considered among our specula-
tions in Chapter 9. And cooling may also be an asset for some electronic
power systems, whose efficiency depends on junction temperatures or
thermal gradients. Large-scale photovoltaic generation systems do not
produce electricity at night, but they are commonly located in near-per-
fect locations for night sky cooling under clear skies and in dry air. Such
generation systems would benefit from the additional cooling by use of
night-cooled fluids, which may be able to decrease the temperatures of
the solar cells by ~5°C or more over what is possible with regular air
cooling during daytime. Stirling cycle engines, used in small solar ther-
mal systems, could also have their efficiencies raised and their environ-
mental impact diminished by using stored coolness, but the gains are
smaller than for solar cells.
Z = σS 2 /kτ (7.7)
Heat
absorbed n-type semiconductor pellets
N
P
N N
P P
N N
P P
Positive (+)
Conductor
Heat
rejected Negative (–)
(Hot side)
average temperature (in K). This quantity is labeled Zτ and is about 1.0
in the best currently available commercial modules. This is much too
small to match conventional cooling methods, but the compactness of
the thermoelectric devices has led to a number of valuable niche mar-
kets. A Zτ value of ~2 would open up the markets for domestic heating
and cooling.
There are many variations on the simple system in Figure 7.20 that
work better or cost less, and nanostructures can be used to boost the sys-
tems [67]. Nanostructures such as quantum wells can in principle help by
raising S and reducing kτ , and various promising related developments have
occurred, but these ideas remain to be made commercially attractive.
Power generation needs higher values of Zτ than those available
with present materials, and the requirements for cooling are even more
stringent. Cooling also needs high values of Δτ. A Zτ of around 1.25 will
open opportunities for widespread use of waste heat and solar radiation
for power. In practice, Z depends on τ, and lamination of materials with
different values of Z may be the best option [68].
It is very difficult to keep the cold side of a thermoelectric generator
at air temperature if the hot side is at ~400°C, say, as is appropriate in
a system operating with concentrated solar radiation. Clearly, cold-side
warming will reduce the power output a lot, so the application of stored
coolness from overnight cooling should raise the efficiency.
New cooling techniques can reduce and offset CO2 emissions, as dis-
cussed above, but there are other major environmental and health ben-
efits as well. Thus, they can have an impact on water supply and water
quality for agriculture and human consumption, and in this context one
should note the necessity to have fresh water in order to diminish diar-
rheal diseases and other severe health threats in the third world. Other
outcomes of the new cooling techniques can be to allow long-term stor-
age of food and to cut down emissions of potent greenhouse gases.
Water condensation directly via sky cooling was discussed above,
but there are numerous other water-related applications. For example,
there are many areas in the world where it is necessary to intercept salty
groundwater before it enters major rivers, which are needed for irriga-
tion and human use. This salty water is typically pumped into evapo-
ration basins so both water and salt are wasted. But fresh water can
be extracted cheaply using the sky cooling from the air just above and
around such basins, or even from select estuaries, because this air has
elevated humidity whereas the sky above can be clear. Crops can be
grown starting with salt water and using special greenhouses. Extraction
of useable bacteria from water can be aided by using low-cost sky cool-
ing together with doped polymers or coated metals.
Consider keeping food fresh. Field-based, low-cost sky cooling sys-
tems, operating both day and night, can provide the temperature drop
that is needed to preserve fruit and vegetables long enough to avoid spoil-
age. Cooling hen houses cheaply in warm countries, perhaps mainly in
the third world, can enable higher egg and chick yields. And there are no
doubt many other niche examples.
Today’s refrigeration technologies use compressed gases that are
worse greenhouse gases than CO2 , and these gases may end up in the
atmosphere unless the scrapping of old refrigeration systems is done with
care. If the projected growth in conventional air conditioning by 2030 was
to occur, then refrigerant gases may eventually pose an equal or a worse
threat than that from fossil fuels. Thus, widespread use of sky cooling
and/or electronic cooling, along with conscious building design to reduce
cooling loads, should be a matter of urgency if this risk is to be averted.
References
361
Figure 8.1 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Silica aero-
gel tile. (From http://www.airglass.se. With permission.)
acute health effects and discomfort seemingly connected with the time
spent in the building while no specific illness or cause can be pinned
down. As much as 30% of all new and refurbished buildings worldwide
may be the subject of complaints connected with indoor air quality. The
SBS is usually nonspecific with symptoms such as headache, eye, nose
or throat irritation, dry cough, itchy or dry skin, dizziness and nausea,
difficulty in concentrating, fatigue, and sensitivity to odors. The cause of
these symptoms is normally not known, but the syndrome is no longer
felt by persons who have left the “sick” building.
There are three main causes of the SBS:
These three causes may act in combination and may supplement other
perceived problems such as inadequate lighting, temperature, or humid-
ity, or excessive noise. Radon and asbestos are not included in the causes
of the SBS. There may be a gender aspect in SBS, and women tend to be
more vulnerable than men.
There are many VOCs—such as decane, toluene, xylene, formal-
dehyde, tetrachlororethylene, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide—each with
specific threshold levels for causing problems [6]. Formaldehyde can be
particularly problematical, especially in new buildings [7], and has a
human sensory irritation threshold of 0.1 mg/m3 and an odor threshold
of 1 mg/m3. Inhaled formaldehyde may affect learning and memory, as
found from animal studies [8]. The concentrations of the VOCs are often
higher indoors than outdoors [9], and the same is true for MVOCs [10].
It is clearly important to be able to measure and survey the air quality
inside buildings. This requires good sensors, which must be low cost and
energy efficient in order to be of practical interest. It will be shown in the
following text that nanostructured oxides can be used for this purpose.
Removal of VOCs and MVOCs is also of great relevance and, as discussed
in Section 8.2, this can be done by photocatalysis using, again, nanostruc-
tured oxides. Interestingly, the very same transition metal oxides are rel-
evant for sensing and purification of air, and these oxides are of central
interest also for electrochromic window coatings (cf. Section 4.11) [11] and
solar reflective high emittance paints (cf. Section 7.3). Gas sensors enable
demand controlled ventilation, and photocatalytic air cleaning makes it
possible to keep the air quality at a desired level without excessive and
energy-consuming air exchange. The energy efficiency will be particularly
good if the photocatalysis is driven by direct solar irradiation.
It has long been known that semiconducting metal oxides can be used for
gas sensing. The underlying mechanism is chemical interaction of the gas
molecules with the semiconductor’s surface leading to changes in its elec-
trical conductivity [12–15]. Molecules in the gas phase, which can serve
as electron donors or acceptors, adsorb on the oxide and form surface
states, which then can exchange electrons with the oxide. If the molecule
is an acceptor it will extract electrons from the oxide and hence decrease
its conductivity (in the case of an n-type conductor); if the molecule is
(a)
E
eVig eVge
Ecb
EF
(b)
Free
Adsorbed molecules
molecules
Catalyst
Electrodes
(c)
e– e– Metal oxide
Substrate C. Contacts
C S G C S. Surface
B B. Bulk
G. Grain
boundaries
(d)
Figure 8.2 Physical structure of a gas sensor with oxide grains between
electrodes (a) and a one-dimensional electronic structure showing inter-
grain and grain-electrode band bending (by eVig and eVge, respectively),
as well as the lower limit of the conduction band of the oxide (Ecb) and
its Fermi level (E F) (b). Also shown are processes upon gas adsorption in
the presence and absence of a catalyst with e – denoting electrons (c) and
an equivalent circuit of the various contributions to the overall conduc-
tivity (d). (After M. Graf et al., J. Nanoparticle Res. 8 [2006] 823–839.
With permission.)
that inter-grain band bending leads to energy barriers whose height can
be influenced by gas adsorption. The lower part of Figure 8.2 shows how
adsorbed molecules provide charge to the oxide. This process is usually
not very species selective, but it can be made so if the metal oxide is
doped with a suitable catalyst, as also shown in Figure 8.2. The bottom
part of the figure contains a simple equivalent circuit of the sensor with
separate contributions due to the surface, bulk, and grain boundaries of
the nanoparticles and of the electrodes.
A good gas sensor is characterized by four main features, namely
(a) (b)
100 100
104
104 0.5 ppm WO3
1 ppm
2 ppm WO3: Pd
4 ppm
103
103 6 ppm
8 ppm
Sensitivity
Sensitivity
10 ppm
Heating 102
102 pulse 10 min
100 100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 1 10
Time (min) H2S Concentration (ppm)
(a) (b)
5000 120
H2 S 100
4000 NO2
CO 80
Sensitivity
3000
60
2000
40
1000 20
0 0
300 400 500 600 700 800
Temperature (K)
8.2.1 General
– CB
Surface hν
recombination –++ hν
A + VB
– +
D
D+
B
C +
Volume
recombination
A– –++ D
–
(100)
(112)
(011)
(101) (011) (110)
(100)
(101) (101)
(100)
(100) (111) (110)
Anatase Rutile
P25
Normalized Surface Concentration
0.8
RII
0.6
AI, AII
0.4
0.2
AI
AIII
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time (min)
• Self-cleaning surfaces
• Air purification
• Self-sterilization
2-x x
Figure 8.6 Spectral optical absorption for films of TiO2 and TiO2–xNx.
(From G. Romualdo Torres et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 108 [2004] 5995–
6003. With permission.)
• Antifogging
• Heat transfer and heat dissipation
• Water purification
• Corrosion protection
Hydrophobic Hydrophilic
surface surface
θwc
θwc
UV
Dark
35 35
(a) (b)
30 30
Contact Angle (deg.)
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0 40 80 120 0 500 1000 1500
UV Irradiation Time (min) Dark Storage Time (hour)
Figure 8.7 The upper part shows the definition of a water contact
angle θwc , which is large for a hydrophobic surface and small for a hydro-
philic surface. The middle part contains photographs of water coverage
on TiO2 surfaces kept in the dark and after UV irradiation. The lower
part shows water contact angle after UV irradiation (a) and after subse-
quent dark storage (b). (From K. Hashimoto et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 44
[2005] 8269–8285. With permission.)
100
98
Transmittance (%)
96
94
92
Glass
90
88
400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
35
30
SiO2
15
10
5 TiO2 – SiO2
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Dark Storage Time (day)
Figure B8.2.2 Water contact angle for films of SiO2 and four dif-
ferent TiO2-SiO2 composites after dark storage. (From M. Houmard
et al., Surface Sci. 602 [2008] 3364–3374. With permission.)
1 Hombikat UV100
Ishihara ST01
Ishihara ST21
Ishihara ST41
Acetone Concentration (c/c0)
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Time (min)
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Conventional Insulations Advanced Insulations
• To have vacuum
• To make the gas-filled pores small enough that they contain very
little gas even at normal pressure
neon
Thermal conductivity(mW/°Cm)
nitrogen
CO2
Figure 8.12 Thicknesses for traditional glass wool (left) and a VIP
(right), both having the same U-value. (From R. Baetens et al., Energy
Buildings 42 [2010] 147–172. With permission.)
100
Transmittance (%)
50
0
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Wavelength (µm)
sources can liberate them from the grinding task of collecting waning
supplies of firewood.
It is also attractive from an energy security viewpoint to have local
supplies, backed by moderate-size storage, in addition to external sup-
plies. This means, for example, that power is available both during a
blackout and during an extended lack of local solar energy due to bad
weather. Energy security is also a national issue as outside resources
become scarce, too expensive, or are cut off as a result of political,
industrial, or other events. Thus, fires in gas processing plants, or pipe-
line problems, have been known to severely reduce gas or oil supplies
in some regions for many months on end. Large local and community-
scale storage of energy will also become increasingly attractive if severe
weather events become more common, which is predicted to happen as
the impact of global warming grows. Thus, renewables combined with
advanced storage technologies will not only help to reduce the extent of
global warming but they also hold much promise as measures for adap-
tation to global warming.
Energy can be stored in many forms: gravitational, electrical, mag-
netic, thermal, chemical, and mechanical. Volume, weight, cost, leak-
age, internal loss, and ease and speed of charging and discharging must
all be considered. The more energy one can easily pack into and remove
from a given volume or mass the better. Mechanical energy storage is
not just in kinetic form, as in a flywheel, but also in stationary form as
elastic strain or compressed air. Coal, oil, and natural gas are stores of
chemical energy laid down by natural processes over millennia. The sun
is a store of nuclear fusion fuel. Each form has a major role in renew-
able energy systems, including dams (gravitational), hydrogen storage
(chemical splitting of water), hot water tanks, massive building compo-
nents, deep underground rocks heated by natural nuclear decay, phase
change materials (thermal and geothermal), and superconducting coils
(magnetic). Thermal storage is important and a natural adjunct to solar
thermal systems and night sky cooling. The key aspect is what material
to use, and this depends on the temperature at which the thermal store
operates. For cooling purposes one needs to store energy from ~0 to
~20°C, for domestic hot water from around 60 to 80°C, and for solar
thermal power at hundreds of degrees. Water, water-glycol mixtures,
and phase change materials are ideal for temperatures from 100°C and
down to about 0°C. For very high temperatures, one can use molten
salts, solid rocks, or large blocks of graphitic carbon. Hot rock and car-
bon block storage is, in essence, man-made geothermal storage.
The focus for the discussion below is on advanced electric energy
storage in batteries and capacitors utilizing nanostructured materi-
als. The likely eventual shift to an all-electric or hybrid-electric vehi-
cle fleet seems to be the main driving force at present in the quest for
the same time it takes to fill today’s car with petrol at a gas station. At
the moment, though, an electric car needs all-night charging, or “most-
of-the-day” or “while-at-work-or-shopping” charging. An alternative
might be a quick change-over battery pack from specialized “battery
stations,” and such facilities are starting to appear to service the growing
electrical vehicle fleet.
The power delivered per unit mass in W/kg is called the power den-
sity, and the energy stored per unit mass in Wh/kg or J/kg is called
the energy density. The “electrical storage landscape” involves a “map”
where these two functions are plotted against each other in a Ragone
chart such as the one shown in Figure 8.14 [67].
Traditional capacitors can deliver 104 to 107 W/kg but can only
store 0.01 to 0.05 Wh/kg. Lead acid batteries can deliver, at best, a
much more leisurely 100 W/kg but have high storage, between 20 Wh/
kg to 8 Wh/kg. What about the storage “territory” between 0.05 and
10 Wh/kg with good power? Can we exceed 20 Wh/kg storage and/or
achieve much better power rates in batteries other than lead-acid ones?
10000
4s 40s
6 min
1000 Electrochemical 1h
Power Density (W/kg)
capacitor
10 h
100
Pb-Acid Zinc-Air
Ni-Cd Ni/MH 100 h
Alkaline Primary
Li-ion
Li
10
Fuel cell
1000 h
1
1 10 100 1000 10000
Energy Density (Wh/kg)
Figure 8.14 Ragone chart of power density versus energy density for
electrochemical capacitors, batteries, and fuel cells. MH denotes metal
hydride. Traditional capacitors are not included as they would require an
extension of the chart by two orders of magnitude down for the x-axis
and three orders up for the y-axis. Diagonal lines represent charge/dis-
charge times. (From Y. Zhang et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 34 [2009]
4889–4899. With permission.) The solid circle has been added to show
the measured performance of a nanostructured virus-based battery in
order to indicate what is becoming possible (cf. Box 8.3 for details).
Definitely! The question now is how far we can go to cover the map in
Figure 8.14. A combination of nanoscience and advances in electrochem-
istry have allowed the filling in of many gaps with batteries based on
lithium chemistry, Ni-Cd, and Ni metal hydrides as well as with more
recent devices such as fuel cells and electrochemical capacitors similar to
the one discussed shortly.
With the advent of very large scale photovoltaic systems, a totally
new class of batteries is being considered for stationary applications;
they need both very large storage capacity and ability for ultra large cur-
rent flows upon charging and discharging. These batteries utilize two
liquid metals separated by a liquid salt, which means they have to be
maintained at ~700°C. The underlying idea is that ions can move much
more easily in liquids than in solids. This work has only just begun, but
is of high interest [68]. It builds upon the well-known high-temperature
electrochemical process for producing aluminum metal in which alumi-
num oxide is first dissolved in molten salt cryolite (Na3AlF6) at 900°C to
enable extraction and reduction of the Al3+ ions to Al metal.
Electrolyte, separator
Electrolyte, active layer
Carbon particles in
contact with an
electrolyte film
+ –
+ + + – – –
+ – –
+ + – –
+ –
+ – + –
+ – + –
+ – + –
+ – + –
1–4 V
+ – + –
+ – + –
+ – + –
0.2–1 nm
[76]. Clearly, much new science is needed for the processes that occur at
nanoelectrodes of different materials before one can proceed with confi-
dence to commercial systems in this field. It is an area of much technical
promise that needs urgent and accelerated research and development.
Nanocathodes are less developed than nanoanodes. The reaction
with the electrolytes can be facilitated with nanoparticles, but this may
also lead to overheating and safety issues. Nanopillars of various oxides
are of concern for cathodes, and such pillars of V2O5 inside porous alu-
mina are of special interest. The V2O5 can also be in nanoporous form.
There is much interesting science to sort out in order to understand how
the physical and lattice structures of these and other cathode materials
interact with the electrolyte and how they intercalate lithium ions [74].
Nanocomposites of ceramic nanoparticles embedded in solid poly-
meric ion conductors—such as polyethylene oxide (PEO) combined
with a lithium salt—show much promise for future improvement in the
performance of electrolytes. They have already led to large enhance-
ments compared to the starting materials. Significant ionic conductivity
in polymeric conductors was only thought to happen at high tempera-
tures, above the glass transition temperature where the polymer chains
become disordered. But crystalline polymer compounds have now
been found in which the Li+ ions conduct and reside in tunnels formed
among the polymer chains, as seen in Figure 8.16. These structures
facilitate fast ion transport. The same electrolyte materials are also of
value for supercapacitors.
We end with two examples of batteries devised according to princi-
ples rooted in biology. Thus, recent work on an all-polymer paper-based
battery-employed cellulose fibers of algal origin (Cladophora) coated
with 50-nm-thick layers of polypyrrole [77]. The specific surface area
of this cellulose is exceptionally large—much larger than for the cellu-
lose typically used in the paper industry—which allows large charging
capacity at a high rate. It is interesting to note that Cladophora is usually
considered an environmental pollutant, which here it is put to good use
via nanotechnology.
Another example of a new nanomaterials-based approach to high-
performance batteries touches on an area of materials development that
is in its infancy but has much to offer. It uses genetic engineering, which
now has reached a point at which it is feasible to implement nanoscale
electrical wiring based on biological principles. This is further elabo-
rated in Box 8.3.
(a) (b)
Figure 8.16 A color version of this figure follows page 200. Structure
of the nanostructured polymer ion conductor PEO6:LiAsF6 as seen look-
ing into the chains and tunnels (a) and along them (b). The Li+ sits inside
the tunnels formed by the PEO. The atoms are fluorine, carbon, and
oxygen. (From A. S. Aricò et al., Nature Mater. 4 [2005] 366–377. With
permission.)
600 200
500
400
Specific Capacity
Specific Energy
300 150
(Wh/Kg)
(mAh/g)
200
EC#2
100 EC#2 50
EC#1 EC#1
E4 E4
a-FePO4
SWNTs
100 nm 4 nm
(a) (b)
References
1. http://www.airglass.se.
2. J. A. Leech, W. C. Nelson, R. T. Burnett, A. Aaron, M. E. Raizenne, It’s
about time: A comparison of Canadian and American time-activity
patterns, J. Exposure Anal. Environm. Epidem. 12 (2002) 427–432.
3. T. Godish, Indoor Environmental Quality, CRC Press, Boca Raton,
FL, 2001.
4. M. J. Mendell, W. J. Fisk, K. Kreiss, H. Levin, D. Alexander, W. S. Cain,
J. R. Girman, C. J. Hines, P. A. Jensen, D. K. Milton, L. P. Rexroat,
K. M. Wallingford, Improving the health of workers in indoor
environments: Priority research needs for a national occupational
research agenda, Am. J. Public Health 92 (2002) 1430–1440.
5. M. Murphy, Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty:
Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers, Duke
University Press, Durham, NC, 2006.
6. P. Wolkoff, C. K. Wilkins, P. A. Clausen, G. D. Nielsen, Organic com-
pounds in office environments: Sensory irritation, odor, measurements
and the role of reactive chemistry, Indoor Air 16 (2006) 7–19.
7. H. Guo, N. H. Kwok, H. R. Cheng, S. C. Lee, W. T. Hung, Y. S. Li,
Formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds in Hong Kong homes:
Concentrations and impact factors, Indoor Air 19 (2009) 206–217.
8. Z. Lu, C. M. Li, Y. Qiao, Y. Yan, X. Yang, Effect of inhaled form-
aldehyde on learning and memory of mice, Indoor Air 18 (2008)
77–83.
9. B. M. Eklund, S. Burkes, P. Morris, L. Mosconi, Spatial and tempo-
ral variability in VOC levels within a commercial retail building,
Indoor Air 18 (2008) 365–374.
10. B. Wessén, K.-O. Schoeps, Microbial volatile organic compounds:
What substances can be found in sick buildings? Analyst 121 (1996)
1203–1205.
11. C. G. Granqvist, A. Azens, P. Heszler, L. B. Kish, L. Österlund,
Nanomaterials for benign indoor environments: Electrochromics
for “smart windows,” sensors for air quality, and photo-catalysis for
air cleaning, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 91 (2007) 355–365.
12. G. Eranna, B. C. Joshi, D. P. Runthala, R. P. Gupta, Oxide materials
for development of integrated gas sensors: A comprehensive review,
Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 29 (2004) 111–188.
13. M. Graf, A. Gurlo, N. Bârsan, U. Weimar, A. Hierlemann,
Microfabricated gas sensor systems with sensitive nanocrystalline
metal-oxide films, J. Nanoparticle Res. 8 (2006) 823–839.
14. N. Barsan, D. Koziej, U. Weimar, Metal oxide-based gas sensor
research: How to? Sensors Actuators B 121 (2007) 18–35.
A Absorptance
A Surface area
AGD Advanced gas deposition
A H Hemispherical absorptance
A lum Luminous absorptance
AM Air mass
Aq Oscillator strength
Asol Solar absorptance
ac Alternating current
α Absorption coefficient
α Deposition angle
αpol Polarizability
C Capacitance
C Cost
C abs Absorption cross section
CB Conduction band
CFL Compact fluorescent light
429
D Dimension
DSSC Dye-sensitized solar cell
d Film thickness
dc Critical thickness (for percolation)
dc Direct current
ddc Thickness of double layer
deq Equivalent film thickness
di Insulator thickness
Δt Time correction
Δτ Temperature difference
f Filling factor
f Frequency
fc Critical filling factor
Φ Energy (or light) flux
H Height
H Magnetic field strength
HOMO Highest occupied molecular orbital
h Planck’s constant
hcp Hexagonal close packed
hν Photon energy
η Efficiency
ηCA Curzon–Ahlborn efficiency
ηCarnot Carnot efficiency
I Intensity
I D Diffuse intensity
Ipb Parallel beam intensity
IPCE Incident photon to current conversion efficiency
Iref Reflected intensity
IR Infrared
J (Julian) day
K Luminous efficacy
k Extinction coefficient
k* Effective extinction coefficient
k B Boltzmann’s constant
kτ Thermal conductivity
k0 Wave vector
L Depolarization factor
L Lifetime
L Longitude
LCD Liquid crystal display
LD Lorentz–Drude
LED Light-emitting diode
LL Luminance
Lloc Local longitude
LOR Light output ratio (for luminaires)
LR Radiance
LSC Luminescent solar concentrator
LSP Localized surface plasmon
LUMO Lowest unoccupied molecular orbital
Lw Latent heat of water
L x,Ly,Lz Depolarization factors for axes x,y,z
λ Wavelength
λc Critical wavelength
λP Plasma wavelength
M Photon exitance
MG Maxwell Garnett
P Dipole moment
P Power
P(λ,τ) Planck radiant exitance
PC Polycarbonate
PCMB [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester
Pd Dipole moment
PEN Poly ethylene naphthalate
PEO Poly ethylene oxide
PET Poly ethylene terephthalate
Pin Input power
PMMA Poly methyl methacrylate
Pout Output power
PV Photovoltaic
PVB Polyvinyl buteral
PVD Physical vapor deposition
P3HT poly(3-hexylthiophene)
p Aspect ration (of light pipe)
p Polarization direction
p(ω) Oscillating dipole moment
pa Per annum
pair Air pressure
Ψ Rotation angle
ϕ Angle (azimuthal)
Q Heat energy
QE Quantum efficiency
QH Heat removal
ρ Resistivity
ρ(ω) Dynamic resistivity
S Seebeck coefficient
S(λ) Solar spectrum
SBS Sick building syndrome
SFR Skylight to floor area ratio
SPP Surface plasmon polariton
SPR Surface plasmon resonance
SSL Solid-state lighting
SWNT Single-walled carbon nanotube
s Polarization direction
sw Sky window (subscript)
Σ Gas sensitivity
σ Electrical conductivity
σ* Effective electrical conductivity
σair Electrical conductivity in air
σgas Electrical conductivity in gas
σSB The Stefan–Boltzmann constant
T Transmittance
Ta Atmospheric transmittance
Ta,sw Atmospheric transmittance in the sky window
TCO Transparent conducting oxide
TIR Total internal reflectance
Tlum Luminous transmittance
TRIMM Transparent index matched microparticle
Tsol Solar transmittance
t Time
τ Temperature
τa Ambient (atmospheric) temperature
τc Critical temperature
τc Output temperature (cold)
τdp Dew point temperature
τe Carrier lifetime
τh Input temperature (hot)
τs Surface (substrate) temperature
V Volume
VB Valence band
VIP Vacuum insulation panel
VOC Volatile organic compound
υF Fermi velocity
Y Admittance
Y(λ) Spectral response of the eye
Y0 Admittance of free space
0.0 14.0
400
Trend=R1.4
–0.5 13.5 350
(mm/day)
50 (b) Global average sea level 300
0 250
(mm)
–50
–100 200
–150
150
1850 1900 1950 2000 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year Year
(a) (b)
62
60
58
Lattitude (°N)
56 B
A
54 C
52
50
–4 –2 0 2 4 6 8
(c)
Longitude (°E)
(d)
(e) (f )
Figure P1 Panorama over climate changes and some of their impacts. Panel (a) shows
increasing global mean temperature and associated rise of global average sea level since
1850. (See text for full caption and credits.)
(c) (d)
(e) (f )
Figure P2 Panorama over some aspects of green nanotechnologies. Panel (a) shows a
low-energy commercial building in San Francisco with energy-efficient glazing and natu-
ral ventilation. (See text for full caption and credits.)
Figure 1.3 Examples of brilliantly colored nanoporous systems whose internal pattern
of holes and solid matter leads to unique optical effects. The photos show the external color
on the left and the associated nanostructure on the right; they refer to “peacock eye” but-
terfly wings (upper) and a famous opal gem, “the flame queen” (lower). (Images used with
permission from the following sources: Upper left: The Peacock Eye butterfly © Copyright
Lynne Kirton [image licensed under the Creative Commons Licence. http://creativecom-
mons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/]; upper right: H. Ghiradella, Appl. Opt. 30, 3492–3500
(1991); lower panel: (c) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_Queen_Opal [image licensed under
Creative Commons ShareAlike 3.0 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons].)
Billion Dollars
20
15
10
5
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004
100
Wind
75 Small Hydro
50
25
0
World Developing EU-25 China Germany United Spain Japan
World States
Figure 1.5 Panel (a) reports annual world investment (in billions of U.S. dollars) in
renewable energy since 1995. Panel (b) shows renewable power capacities in GW for the
world and for select groups of nations and individual countries in 2004. (Adapted from
REN21 [Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century], Renewables 2005: Global
Status Report, The Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC, 2005; http://www.ren21.net.)
Figure 2.1 This oil painting on canvas by Prince Eugen of Sweden (1865–1947) dates
from 1895 and is known as The Cloud. It is in the collection of the Gothenburg Museum
of Art in Sweden. (From http://www.waldemarsudde.se/xsaml_molnet_g.html. Photo by
Lars Engelhardt. Reprinted with permission.)
Visible Visible
Reflectance
Reflectance
NIR NIR
0% 0%
Wavelength
(a) (b)
0.75 μm 2.5 μm 30 μm
100%
UV
Visible
Reflectance
Thermal radiation
Solar
NIR
0%
(c)
Figure 2.15 Ideal spectral reflectance for opaque surfaces. Panel (a) refers to a solar
absorber and a surface (paint) for cooling applications; the sharp transition is at ~2.5
μm in wavelength. Panel (b) shows ideal spectral reflectance for maximizing radiation
loss to the clear sky; the reflectance is 100% except where the atmosphere is transpar-
ent (between 8 and 13 μm). Panel (c) applies to colored surfaces (paints) that look the
same but have widely different thermal performance; the properties are ideal for warm
and cold climates. Ranges for ultraviolet (UV), visible, near-infrared (NIR), and thermal
radiation are shown.
UV UV
Visible Visible
Transmittance
Transmittance
Thermal radiation Thermal radiation
Solar Solar
Figure 2.16 Ideal spectral transmittance for windows in (a) cold and (b) hot climates;
the dotted option at visible wavelengths is for glare reduction. Ranges for ultraviolet (UV),
visible, near-infrared (NIR), and thermal radiation are shown.
(a) (b)
Figure 3.1 Two pieces of glassware, both doped with gold nanoparticles. Part (a) is the
Roman Lycurgus cup from the British Museum and part (b) is an old Victorian vase owned
by one of the authors (GBS). [Part (a) is from http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/high-
lights/highlight_objects/pe_mla/t/the_lycurgus_cup.aspx. Reproduced with permission.]
N
θ S
29°
100 mm
(a) (b)
c
b
a
3.0 µm
Figure 5.16 The left-hand panel shows a cross section of a one-dimensional photo-
nic polymer crystal constructed from alternating layers; dark-colored layers are PMMA
and light-colored layers are (birefringent) PET. The right-hand panel shows relative light
transport along mirror light pipes of aspect ratio 17 including a foil of the shown material
(a) and including specular reflecting aluminum (b) and silver (c) films. (From M. F. Weber
et al., Science 287 [2000] 2451–2456. With permission.)
Edge exit
light
Figure 5.26 Flexible transparent polymer light guide containing transparent index
matched microparticles. An integrating sphere (cf. Section 2.4.2) is used to measure the
total light output at different segments along the guide.
Figure 5.28 Two applications of colored LEDs. (From K. Dowling, LED Essentials,
Department of Energy, Webinar October 10 [2007]; http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/build-
ings/publications/pdfs/ssl/webinar_2007-10-11.pdf.)
(b) (c)
100 100
Asol = 0.86 Asol = 0.81
80 Etherm = 0.04 80 Etherm = 0.06
Reflectance (%)
Reflectance (%)
60 60
575 nm
40 683 nm 40
20 20
0 0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm)
100 100
Asol = 0.92 Asol = 0.86
80 Etherm = 0.08 80 Etherm = 0.08
Reflectance (%)
Reflectance (%)
60 60
40 515 nm 40 463 nm
20 20
0 0
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50
Wavelength (µm) Wavelength (µm)
Figure 6.12 Spectral reflectance for TiAlOxNy films made by sputter deposition onto
Al. Different colors (shown) were obtained by selecting film thicknesses leading to reflec-
tance maxima at the wavelengths shown in the luminous wavelength range. Corresponding
values of A sol and E therm are stated. (From D. Zhu, S. Zhao, Solar Energy Mater. Solar
Cells [2010] in press. With permission.)
0.1
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
PV layer extinction coefficient
1.0
Reflectance
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
5
6 80 90
7
8 60 70
Wav
elen
9
10 40 50 nce (°)
30 de
gth ( 11 20 Inci
µm) 12
13 0 10
n g le of
A
Figure 7.12 Spectral and angular-dependent reflectance for nanoparticles of SiO2 and
c-SiC embedded in polyethylene foil. (From A. R. Gentle, G. B. Smith, Nano Lett. 10
[2010] 373–379. With permission.)
(a) (b)