0% found this document useful (0 votes)
167 views18 pages

The Road Ahead For Ombudsman Malaysia TH PDF

Uploaded by

NN8
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
167 views18 pages

The Road Ahead For Ombudsman Malaysia TH PDF

Uploaded by

NN8
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The road ahead for Ombudsman Malaysia Free…

Saved to Dropbox • 16 Oct 2018 at 05D33

HOME NEWS BERITA OPINION LIFESTY

The road ahead for


Ombudsman Malaysia
Sharifah Munirah Alatas - October 15, 2018 8:20 AM
Last month, Prime Minister Dr Mahathir
Mohamad announced plans to establish an
Ombudsman Malaysia.

An Ombudsman is an independent,
impartial and free body which examines
citizens’ complaints usually associated with
unfair and unjust treatment by the
government. Often described as a
“government overseer”, it is a legislative
commissioner for investigating bureaucratic
abuse.

The staff in the Ombudsman are supposed


to be impartial as they are arbiters between
the government and individual citizens.

Complaints and grievances of government


maladministration, injustice and negligence
should be addressed by the Ombudsman.
However, amid the recent news about
setting it up, a nagging thought keeps
running through my mind: “An outlier must
be prepared to face the dilemma of being a
lonely voice in society.”

How is this relevant to Mahathir’s call to


transform the Public Complaints Bureau into
the Ombudsman Malaysia? Let me explain.

I recall that in the late 1960s, a seminal


study on the sociology of corruption in
Southeast Asian societies was published.
World-renowned intellectual Syed Hussein
Alatas, the Malaysian who wrote the piece,
was that lonely voice.
Almost 60 years have gone by. We have still
not implemented the Ombudsman scheme,
despite the metastatic transformation of
corruption in our nation.

Between the late 60s and the present,


sporadic references were made to this, but
at best it was received as mere lip service.

Ungku Aziz, Lim Kit Siang, MD Salleh


Yaapar and a few more prominent
individuals and institutes have referred to
the establishment of an Ombudsman.

I sincerely hope, though, that the prime


minister will not be an outlier in his current
quest to introduce this paradigmatic shift in
our socio-political process.

Earlier this month, in a London interview,


Mahathir responded to a question about
corruption. He alluded to the fact that there
are different levels of corruption in every
society, saying the level had reached
“dangerous heights” during Malaysia’s
previous administration.
Professor Alatas wrote about this in the
1960s when he outlined three stages of
corruption in societies: restricted, rampant
and destructive.

My guess is, Mahathir is quite aware that


Malaysia has already reached the end of
stage two.

It is definitely time to revisit the thoughts


of Syed Hussein Alatas, and Mahathir’s
Ombudsman Malaysia move is in the right
(and only) direction. However, I hope
history will not repeat itself.

In 1989, a special Cabinet committee


headed by then-deputy prime minister
Anwar Ibrahim was set up with the sole
purpose of introducing an Ombudsman
system. Alatas, the then vice-chancellor of
Universiti Malaya, was commissioned to
submit a special report on it.

He recommended the appointment of all


Ombudsman who have the powers to
receive and investigate public complaints
against government maladministration and
negligence.

In 1993, Lim Kit Siang called on the Cabinet


to revive this idea. His statement is filed
under “Ombudsman, Parliament”. He said in
order for all Ombudsman to be effective,
they should be independent of the
government and answerable only to
Parliament.

Now, in 2018, we seem closer to realising


our hope for an Ombudsman. However, the
practical difficulties of ridding our society of
corruption and bureaucratic abuse are
enormous.

This includes potential mishandling and


mismanagement after the Ombudsman
scheme is put in place.

I would like to touch on possible scenarios


that could emerge between the
Ombudsman and Ombudsman “watchers”.
The implication here is that even the
Ombudsman, in the beginning, should be
monitored by the public because the new
Malaysia is still groping through a myriad of
social, political and economic problems left
over from the previous regime.

There are eight areas on which we should


focus.

First, the staff of Ombudsman Malaysia


should be professional and of high quality.
They should know about matters being
investigated, be analytically equipped to
grasp the essence of the problem and be
intelligent enough to accept a complaint “at
face value”. If not, complaints may be
easily dismissed, often due to ignorance.

Essentially, the Ombudsman staff should be


well-informed of issues in order to be able
to provide the appropriate information to
complainants on the identity of advisers
associated with specific cases.

Second, if there are multiple Ombudsman


staff involved in a complaint, the process
towards a solution could become highly
bureaucratic, inefficient and impersonal. A
single-case officer should deal with a case
from beginning to end.

Third, the public must be made confident


that the Ombudsman process is not a
smoke screen. The process is not akin to a
court case, for instance, so the danger is
that secrecy and opacity may set in.

Fourth, a survey of grievances made to the


Ombudsman should be published annually
to allow for year-to-year comparisons. This
way, the public can monitor the successes
and failures concerning their specific
complaints.

Fifth, the Ombudsman process should not


be seen as one-sided, with the public not
being made privy to discussions between
the Ombudsman and the government
bodies being investigated. Furthermore,
reports should not be shared with the body
being investigated prior to sharing it with
the complainant.
Sixth, the Ombudsman should not be
perceived as being “under pressure” or as
gate-keepers. The potential of the
Ombudsman becoming “window dressing”
rather than a serious attempt to investigate
issues is a phenomenon with which the
Malaysian public is very familiar.

Seventh, there should be sufficient


interaction between the Ombudsman and
the public such as participation in reform
activities led by the Ombudsman, to dispel
suspicions regarding its independence.

Eighth, and to my mind, the most


fundamental requirement is that the
Ombudsman must be made up of
individuals of high moral integrity who have
a powerful anti-corruption mentality. They
should not be greedy. Because these
individuals themselves are not corrupt or
dishonest, it is likely they will not tolerate
corruption or other forms of abuse.

Once Ombudsman Malaysia is established,


it is my hope that the process of profound
moral awakening will start. This is urgently
needed in our society.
This moral awakening has to be moved by
an ideal of excellence and a sense of
shame.

* The views expressed are those of the


author and do not necessarily reflect
those of FMT.

Subscribe to our newsletter


and get news delivered to your
mailbox.

Email address

Subscribe
You May Like Sponsored Links by Taboola

Big Electric Bills? There is a Valid


Way To Reduce It!
mixer-news
6 million kids are learning English
with this app.
Download Now! | Lingokids App

20 Foods That Are Killing You Slowly


healthyandpretty

Daily Rewards For Malaysians Born


Before 1981
Survey Compare

Did You Know?


1 2

It costs the United States tax In 1952, t


payers approximately $3.3 A. Einstei
million per prisoner to detain a be their P
criminal in Guantanamo Bay saying he
Prison. ashamed

Sponsored

TAGS Hussein Alatas ombudsman

public complaints Sharifah Munirah Alatas

Previous article Next article

Koscielny says France Zazai blitzes 12-ball 50


career ‘;nished’ to equal ‘idol’ and rival
Gayle

RELATED ARTICLES MORE FROM AUTHOR

The great threat to rule of law


Hard-nosed, not hook-nosed

Lantikan politik dalam


perkhidmatan awam wajar
ditamatkan, kata bekas KSN

MOST VIEWED LAST 2 DAYS


God’s will that Anwar leads Malaysia, says
Nazri
October 13, 2018 11:51 PM

Lobby ceiling at KL Hilton comes crashing


down, 1 injured
October 14, 2018 6:31 PM

Guan Eng pays tribute to late Saleem


October 14, 2018 7:21 PM

Dr M’s overseas trips cost RM6.3 mil


October 15, 2018 5:19 PM

Guan Eng: Be like Ghafar Baba, no need for


Datukship
October 14, 2018 2:42 PM

Report on Najib and murders: Cops may call


up politicians, says IGP
October 13, 2018 4:49 PM

After Terengganu, Oktoberfest banned in


Johor too
October 14, 2018 12:19 PM

1MDB’s debt to IPIC may be more than


double initial amount, says report
October 14, 2018 1:33 PM
CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
Putrajaya urged to ratify UN
declaration on religious freedom
October 16, 2018 12:00 AM

Court rejects election petitions for


Sipitang, Sook and Kundasang
October 15, 2018 10:56 PM

Present white paper on new


Bumiputera policy too, Zaid tells
Azmin
October 15, 2018 10:33 PM

Immigration DG: We were


conducting census, not registering
refugees
October 15, 2018 9:34 PM

I turned down ‘Datuk Seri’ award


thrice, says Redzuan
October 15, 2018 8:56 PM
MOST VIEWED LAST 2 DAYS
God’s will that Anwar leads
Malaysia, says Nazri
October 13, 2018 11:51 PM

Lobby ceiling at KL Hilton comes


crashing down, 1 injured
October 14, 2018 6:31 PM

Guan Eng pays tribute to late


Saleem
October 14, 2018 7:21 PM

CURRENT HIGHLIGHTS
Putrajaya urged to ratify UN
declaration on religious freedom
October 16, 2018 12:00 AM

Court rejects election petitions for


Sipitang, Sook and Kundasang
October 15, 2018 10:56 PM

Present white paper on new


Bumiputera policy too, Zaid tells
Azmin
October 15, 2018 10:33 PM

About Us

Contact Us

Advertise With Us

DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Email address Subscribe

Disclaimers / Copyright Privacy & Policy

Copyright © 2018 FMT Media Sdn Bhd. All Rights Reserved.

You might also like