ANALYTIC SCORING RUBRIC FOR PORTFOLIO IN ASTRENGTH

NAME: _______________________________________ SECTION: __________________________

INSTRUCTOR: ___________________________________ DATE: _____________________________

Objectives:
This portfolio aims to assess the information about the following:
 the attitudes and values you have developed in this course,
 your understanding of the concepts and principles of strength of mterials,
 the skills that you have developed as shown in the products of your learning.

Instructions: Please judge the performance based on the given numerical scale and its corresponding description.
 Refer to the Criteria A when rating the final packaging of student’s learning portfolio which are indicators of his/her attitudes and values.
The portfolio owner, his/her peers and teachers can be involved in rating this part of the rubric.
 Refer to the Criteria B when rating student’s written reflection reflecting his/her understanding of the concepts and principles of strength
of materials. The portfolio owner, his/her peers and teachers can be involved in rating this part of the rubric.
 Refer to C to assess the student’s level of performance on the expected products of his/her learning. The course professor will be the one
to rate the work on specific dates. However, revised outputs are included to validate student’s skills on expected learning outcomes.

A. Reflection of the Owner’s Personal Traits/Attitudes/Values/Habits (20%)

Scale Indicators Evaluators Ave

Criteria 4 - Excellent 3- Very Good/ Very 2 – Good / Satisfactory 1 – Needs Improvement 1 2 3
Satisfactory Self Peer Prof
1.Practicality in Very practical that the Practical that the chosen Impractical that the Very Impractical that the
the Choice of the chosen container can last container can last for less chosen container can last chosen container is
Container for more than 2 years than 2 year but more than for approximately one something that one finds
e.g. accordion bag, a year e.g. clear book, ring year or less e.g. not worthy to keep e.g.
bound material binder envelope, box loose sheets in a folder
2.Flexibility in the Very Flexible that it can Flexible that it can allow Not so Flexible that it Not Flexible that it cannot
Use of the allow addition and addition but not deletion can allow deletion but allow addition and
Container deletion of entries of entries not addition of entries deletion of entries

3.Attractiveness Very Inviting that Inviting that viewers will Not so Inviting that Not Inviting that viewers
of the Cover viewers will explore and explore the contents viewers will only skim will ignore it.
read all the contents through the pages.
4.Creativity in Very Creative that all the Creative that some Not so Creative that a Not Creative that all the
the Layout of entries are displayed entries are displayed few entries are displayed entries are displayed
Entries artistically artistically artistically ordinarily
5.Resourcefulnes Very Resourceful that Resourceful that less Not so Resourceful that Not Resourceful that very
s in the Material alternative or indigenous expensive materials were expensive materials were expensive materials were
used materials were used in used in developing the used in developing the used in developing the
developing the portfolio portfolio portfolio portfolio
6.Neatness of Very neat in all entries Neat in many entries Not so neat in many Not neat in all entries
work entries

7.Organization of Very organized that Organized that there is a Not so organized that Not organized that there
Entries there is a table of table of contents, which entries were just labelled is no table of contents and
contents, which reflects reflects what entries were but no table of contents entries were not even
what entries were kept kept but no directions labled
and where to find them where to find them
at one glance
8.Enthusiasm in Very enthusiastic such Enthusiastic such that Not so enthusiastic such Not enthusiastic such that
doing the work that all entries were many entries were that a few entries were no entry was decorated
decorated reflecting decorated reflecting one’s decorated reflecting reflecting one’s enjoyment
one’s enjoyment in doing enjoyment in doing the one’s enjoyment in doing in doing the work
the work work the work
9.Promptness in Very prompt that the Prompt that the portfolio Not so Prompt that the Not Prompt that the
submission portfolio was submitted was submitted a day or 2 portfolio was submitted 3 portfolio was submitted 5
on time after the deadline to 4 days after the days or more after the
deadline deadline
Partial Portfolio Grade (20%) Average

B. Reflection of the One’s Knowledge and Understanding of the Course Contents (20%)
Note: The student’s written reflections (e.g. logs, journals, diaries, statement of goals/accomplishment, etc. are possible evidences of one’s
knowledge and understanding of the course contents.
Scale Indicators Evaluators
Criteria 4 - Excellent 3- Very Good/ Very 2 – Good / Satisfactory 1 – Needs Improvement 1 2 3 Ave
Satisfactory Self Peer Prof
1.Clarity of purpose Very Clear such that Clear such that there is a Not so clear such that Not clear such that there
there is a statement of statement of what one there the is no statement of what
what one aims to aims to accomplish in the goals/objectives one aims to accomplish in
accomplish in the course/subject but not on course/subject were just the course/subject
course/subject and how she wants to enumerated
how she wants to accomplish them
accomplish them
2.Completeness of Complete that means Partially Complete that Incomplete that means No reflective journal found
Reflective Journals all learning means only in class only a few (1-2) learning
experiences both in experiences were experiences have been
and out of class were reflected upon reflected upon
reflected upon
3.Relevance of Very relevant such Relevant such that the Irrelevant such that the Very irrelevant such that
Entries in the that the importance in importance in the course importance in the course the importance in the
Course the course of all the of many entries (3 or of a few entries (1-2) course of the entries were
entries were indicated more) were indicated were indicated not indicated
 ANALYTIC SCORING RUBRIC FOR PORTFOLIO IN ASTRENGTH

4. Accuracy of Very accurate meaning Accurate meaning Partially accurate Inaccurate meaning
Knowledge reflected were all based reflected were only based meaning reflected were reflected were just one’s
from class meetings and from class meetings but no just one’s personal personal opinions but no
those personally extra effort exerted to opinions but supported personal experiences cited
gathered by the owner gather more information with personal
but acknowledged the experiences.
source
5. Application of Very clear such that Clear such that there are Not so clear such that Very clear such that there
Ideas there are many some explanations of how there are few are no explanations of
explanations of how ideas could be applied in explanations of how how ideas could be
ideas could be applied the future work as an ideas could be applied applied in the future work
in the future work as an architect in the future work as an as an architect
architect architect
6. Depth of Very deep such that all Deep such that many Shallow such that only Very shallow such that all
reflections reflections include how reflections include how few reflections include reflections narrate only
one relates new one relates new learning how one relates new what Has been discussed
learning with existing with existing knowledge or learning with existing in class..
knowledge or previous previous experiences. knowledge or previous
experiences. experiences.
Partial Portfolio Grade (20%) Average

C. Evidences of what the Owner is Capable of doing in Relation to the Course Contents (60%)
Note: The student’s written outputs (e.g. checked and revised assignments, problem solving worksheets, quizzes and mid-term exam) are
evidences of student’s level of performance on the expected products of his/her learning.
Scale Indicators Evaluators
Criteria 4 - Excellent 3- Very Good/ Very 2 – Good / Satisfactory 1 – Needs Improvement 1 2 3 Ave
Satisfactory Self Peer Prof
1.Determining The revised work has no The revised work has few The revised work has The revised work has many
external forces and errors or reflects the errors (1-3) or reflects the some errors (4-6) or errors (7 or more) or
moment analysis as work of a professional work of a well trained reflects the work of a reflects the work of a poorly
applied to statically architect who needs no intern architect who needs intern architect who trained intern architect who
determinate guidance from a less guidance from a needs some guidance needs more guidance from
systems. professional professional from a professional a professional
2. Determining The revised work has no The revised work has few The revised work has The revised work has many
external forces and errors or reflects the errors (1-3) or reflects the some errors (4-6) or errors (7 or more) or
moment analysis as work of a professional work of a well trained reflects the work of a reflects the work of a poorly
applied to trusses. architect who needs no intern architect who needs intern architect who trained intern architect who
guidance from a less guidance from a needs some guidance needs more guidance from
professional professional from a professional a professional
3. Calculate stresses The revised work has no The revised work has few The revised work has The revised work has many
and strains in axial errors or reflects the errors (1-3) or reflects the some errors (4-6) or errors (7 or more) or
members work of a professional work of a well trained reflects the work of a reflects the work of a poorly
architect who needs no intern architect who needs intern architect who trained intern architect who
guidance from a less guidance from a needs some guidance needs more guidance from
professional professional from a professional a professional
4. Recognizing The revised work has no The revised work has few The revised work has The revised work has many
properties of errors or reflects the errors (1-3) or reflects the some errors (4-6) or errors (7 or more) or
section (centroids work of a professional work of a well trained reflects the work of a reflects the work of a poorly
and moment of architect who needs no intern architect who needs intern architect who trained intern architect who
inertia) guidance from a less guidance from a needs some guidance needs more guidance from
professional professional from a professional a professional
5. Determine The revised work has no The revised work has few The revised work has The revised work has many
bending and shear errors or reflects the errors (1-3) or reflects the some errors (4-6) or errors (7 or more) or
stresses in simple work of a professional work of a well trained reflects the work of a reflects the work of a poorly
beams architect who needs no intern architect who needs intern architect who trained intern architect who
guidance from a less guidance from a needs some guidance needs more guidance from
professional professional from a professional a professional
6. Solve simple The revised work has no The revised work has few The revised work has The revised work has many
beam design errors or reflects the errors (1-3) or reflects the some errors (4-6) or errors (7 or more) or
equations work of a professional work of a well trained reflects the work of a reflects the work of a poorly
architect who needs no intern architect who needs intern architect who trained intern architect who
guidance from a less guidance from a needs some guidance needs more guidance from
professional professional from a professional a professional
Partial Portfolio Grade (60%) Average

Extra Credit: Student Selected Entry (Additional 10%)

Scale Indicators Evaluator Ave
Criteria 4 - Excellent 3- Very Good/ Very 2 – Good / Satisfactory 1 – Needs Improvement 1 2 3
Satisfactory Self Peer Prof
Significance of the entry Significance of the entry Significance of the entry Significance of the entry
was well explained and was briefly explained but was briefly explained but was not explained and is
the entry is worth the entry is worth keeping the entry is not worth not even worth keeping
keeping in the portfolio in the portfolio keeping in the portfolio
Partial Portfolio Grade (Additional 10%) Average

Final Portfolio Rating

Final Portfolio Grade

Portfolio Rating Equivalent Grade Portfolio Rating Equivalent Grade

4 100 2 80
3 90 1 70
A decimal point of 0.1 would mean 1% higher. Example a rating of 3.6 would mean 96%