Scribd
Upload
59 views2 pages

Former Seventeenth Division: Resolution

1) The Court of Appeals denied the motion for reconsideration filed by petitioners Lourdes Perez Arambulo et al. regarding a previous resolution issued on September 24, 2020. 2) The Court found no substantial grounds or reasons presented in the motion to warrant reversing its previous findings. 3) The motion for reconsideration was denied.

Uploaded by

Netweight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
59 views2 pages

Former Seventeenth Division: Resolution

1) The Court of Appeals denied the motion for reconsideration filed by petitioners Lourdes Perez Arambulo et al. regarding a previous resolution issued on September 24, 2020. 2) The Court found no substantial grounds or reasons presented in the motion to warrant reversing its previous findings. 3) The motion for reconsideration was denied.

Uploaded by

Netweight
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

COURT OF APPEALS
Manila

FORMER SEVENTEENTH DIVISION


LOURDES PEREZ ARAMBULO, CA-G.R. SP NO. 164985
NORMAND PEREZ
ARAMBULO, ROMANO
MANALO PEREZ, JOHN
EMMANUEL M. PEREZ, MA.
ERINOR P. PEREZ PARAO,
WALIFREDO MANALO PEREZ,
JOSE GERMAN MANALO
PEREZ, JOHN ERINORIO
MANALO PEREZ, DANILO
PEREZ ARAMBULO, JR.,
BERNARD PEREZ ARAMBULO,
MA. LUIGGIE TERESITA M.
PEREZ, and MA. LOURDES
TERESITA MANLAPIG PEREZ
Petitioners,

- versus - Members:

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF GARCIA-FERNANDEZ,M.V.,


CALAMBA LAGUNA, BRANCH Chairperson
92, presided by Acting ROXAS, and
Presiding Judge Wilhelmina B. AMPUAN,JJ.
Jorge-Wagan, and HEIRS OF
POTENCIANO DE MESA,
represented by Marita De Mesa Promulgated:
Acda,
Respondents. February 26, 2021
x ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x
RESOLUTION
GARCIA-FERNANDEZ, J.:

Acting on the motion for reconsideration filed by petitioners, this


Court finds no cogent reason to warrant a reconsideration of the
resolution promulgated on September 24, 2020 because the motion
has not raised any new or substantial ground or reason calling for
reversal of this Court's findings.
CA-G.R. SP NO. 164985 2
RESOLUTION
===================

WHEREFORE, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

MYRA V. GARCIA-FERNANDEZ
Associate Justice

WE CONCUR:

RUBEN REYNALDO G. ROXAS


Associate Justice

ALFREDO D. AMPUAN
Associate Justice

You might also like