We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 61
Laeasy The
~ FMushroom
‘a re
E nd
/) “he
World
ON THE
POSSIBILITY
CAPITALIST
RUINSThe Mushroom
at the End of
the World
On the Possibility of Life in
Capitalist Ruins
ANNA LOWENHAUPT TSING
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS
Princeton and OxfordContents
Enabling Entanglements vit
PROLOGUE. AUTUMN AROMA TI :
PART! What's Left? 1 |
1 | Arts of Noticing 17
2 1 Contamination as Collaboration 27
3 | Some Problems with Scale 37
INTERLUDE. SMELLING 45
PART Il After Progress: Salvage Accumulation 55
4 | Working the Edge 6r
FREEDOM...
5 | OpenTicket, Oregon 73
6 | War Stories 85
7 | What Happened to the State? Two Kinds of Asian
Americans 97vi
PART Ill
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
PART IV
18
19
20
IN TRANSLATION
Between the Dollar and the Yen 109
From Gifts to Commodities—and Back 121
Salvage Rhythms: Business in Disturbance 13r
INTERLUDE. TRACKING 137
Disturbed Beginnings: Unintentional Design 149
The Life of the Forest 155
COMING UP AMONG PINES .. -
History 167
Resurgence 179
Serendipity 193
Ruin 205
- IN GAPS AND PATCHES
Science as Translation 217
Flying Spores 227
INTERLUDE. DANCING 241
In the Middle of Things 25:
Matsutake Crusaders: Waiting for Fungal
Action 257
Ordinary Assets 267
Anti-ending: Some People I Met along the
Way 277
SPORE TRAIL. THE FURTHER ADVENTURES
OF A MUSHROOM 285
Notes 289
Index 323Enabling Entanglements
EVER SINCE THE ENLIGHTENMENT, WESTERN PHILOSO-
phers have shown us a Nature that is grand and universal but also passive
and mechanical. Nature was a backdrop and resource for the moral inten-
tionality of Man, which could tame and master Nature. It was left to fabu-
lists, including non-Western and non-civilizational storytellers, to remind
us of the lively activities of all beings, human and not human.
Several things have happened to undermine this division of labor.
First, all that taming and mastering has made such a mess that it is un-
clear whether life on earth can continue. Second, interspecies entangle-
ments that once seemed the stuff of fables are now materials for serious
discussion among biologists and ecologists, who show how life requires
the interplay of many kinds of beings. Humans cannot survive by
stomping on all the others. Third, women and men from around the
world have clamored to be included in the status once given to Man.
Our riotous presence undermines the moral intentionality of Man’s
Christian masculinity, which separated Man from Nature.
The time has come for new ways of telling true stories beyond civiliza-
tional first principles. Without Man and Nature, all creatures can come back
to life, and men and women can express themselves without the strictures
of a parochially imagined rationality. No longer relegated to whispers in theviii ENABLING ENTANGLEMENTS
night, such stories might be simultaneously true and fabulous. How else can
we account for the fact that anything is alive in the mess we have made?
Following a mushroom, this book offers such true stories. Unlike
most scholarly books, what follows is a riot of short chapters. I wanted
them to be like the flushes of mushrooms that come up after a rain: an
over-the-top bounty; a temptation to explore; an always too many. The
chapters build an open-ended assemblage, not a logical machine; they
gesture to the so-much-more out there. They tangle with and interrupt
each other—mimicking the patchiness of the world I am trying to de-
scribe. Adding another thread, the photographs tell a story alongside
the text but do not illustrate it directly. I use images to present the spirit
of my argument rather than the scenes I discuss.
Imagine “first nature” to mean ecological relations (including humans)
and “second nature” to refer to capitalis
transformations of the environ-
ment. This usage—not the same as more popular versions—derives from
William Cronon’s Nature’ Metropolis. My book then offers “third nature”
that is, what manages to live despite capitalism. To even notice third na-
ture, we must evade assumptions that the future is that singular direction
ahead. Like virtual particles in a quantum field, multiple futures pop in
and out of possibility; third nature emerges within such temporal polyph-
ony. Yet progress stories have blinded us. To know the world without
them, this book sketches open-ended assemblages of entangled ways of
life, as these coalesce in coordination across many kinds of temporal
rhythms. My experiment in form and my argument follow each other.
The book is based on fieldwork conducted during matsutake seasons
between 2004 and 2011 in the United States, Japan, Canada, China, and
Finland—as well as interviews with scientists, foresters, and matsutake
traders there as well as in Denmark, Sweden, and Turkey. Perhaps my
own matsutake trail is not yet over: matsutake in places as far afield as
Morocco, Korea, and Bhutan beckon. My hope is that readers will expe-
rience some of tl
is “mushroom fever” with me in the chapters to come.
Below the forest floor, fungal bodies extend themselves in nets and
skeins, binding roots and mineral soils, long before producing mush-
rooms. All books emerge from similarly hidden collaborations. A list ofENABLING ENTANGLEMENTS — ix
individuals is inadequate, and so I begin with the collaborative engage-
ments that made this book possible. In contrast to most recent ethnog-
raphy, the research on which this book is based was pursued in experi-
ments in collaboration, Furthermore, the questions that seemed to me
worth pursuing emerged from knots of intense discussion in which I
have been only one among many participants.
This book emerged from the work of the Matsutake Worlds Research
Group: Timothy Choy, Lieba Faicr, Elaine Gan, Michael Hathaway, Mi-
yako Inoue, Shiho Satsuka, and myself. In much of the history of anthro-
pology, ethnography has been a solo performance; our group convened to
explore a new anthropology of always-in-process collaboration. The point
of ethnography is to learn how to think about a situation together with
one’s informants; research categories develop with the research, not before
it. How can one use this method when working with other researchers—
cach learning from different local knowledge? Rather than knowing the
object in advance, as in big science, our group was determined to let our
research goals emerge through collaboration. We took up this challenge
by trying a variety of forms of research, analysis, and writing.
This book opens a Matsutake Worlds mini-series; Michael Hathaway
and Shiho Satsuka will present the next volumes. Consider it an adven-
ture story in which the plot unfolds from one book to the next. Our
curiosity about matsutake worlds cannot be contained in one volume
or expressed by one voice; stand by to find out what happens next. Fur-
thermore, our books join other genres, including essays and articles.?
Through the work of the team, plus filmmaker Sara Dosa, Elaine Gan
and I designed a web space for stories of pickers, scientists, traders, and
forest managers across several continents: www.matsutakeworlds.org.
Elaine Gan’s artand-science practice has inspired further collabora-
tions. Sara Dosa’s film The Last Season adds to these conversations.‘
Matsutake research takes one not only beyond disciplinary knowl-
edge but also to places where varied languages, histories, ecologies, and
cultural traditions shape worlds. Faier, Inoue, and Satsuka are scholars
of Japan, and Choy and Hathaway of China. I was to be the group’s
Southeast Asianist, working with pickers from Laos and Cambodia in
the U.S. Pacific Northwest. It turned out, however, that I needed help.
Collaboration with Hjorleifur Jonsson and the assistance of Lue Vang
and David Pheng were essential to my research with Southeast Asiansx ENABLING ENTANGLEMENTS
in the United States’ Eric Jones, Kathryn Lynch, and Rebecca McLain of
the Institute for Culture and Ecology got me started in the mushroom
world and remained amazing colleagues. Meeting Beverly Brown was in-
spirational. Amy Peterson introduced me to the Japanese-American mat-
sutake community and showed me the ropes. Sue Hilton looked at
pines with me. In Yunnan, Luo Wen-hong became a team member. In
Kyoto, Noboru Ishikawa was an extraordinary guide and colleague. In
Finland, Eira-Maija Savonen arranged everything, Each trip made me
aware of the importance of these collaborations.
There are many other kinds of collaborations that go into producing
a book. This one draws particularly on two intellectual developments,
both local and broad. I had the privilege of learning feminist science
studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz, in part from teaching
with Donna Haraway. Here | glimpsed how scholarship could cross be-
tween natural science and cultural studies not just through critique but
also through world-building, knowledge. Multispecies storytelling was
one of our products. The feminist science studies community in Santa
Cruz has continued to make my work possible. Through it, too, I met
many later companions. Andrew Mathews kindly reintroduced me to
forests. Heather Swanson helped me think through comparison, and
Japan. Kirsten Rudestam talked to me about Oregon. I learned from con-
versations with Jeremy Campbell, Zachary Caple, Roseann Cohen, Rosa
Ficek, Colin Hoag, Katy Overstreet, Bettina Stoctzer, and many more.
Meanwhile, the strength of critical feminist studies of capitalism in
Santa Cruz and beyond inspired my interest in knowing capitalism be-
yond its heroic reifications. If I have continued to engage with Marxist
categories, despite their sometimes-clunky relation to thick description,
it is because of the insights of feminist colleagues, including Lisa Rofel
and Sylvia Yanagisako. UC Santa Cruz’s Institute for Advanced Femi-
nist Research stimulated my first attempts to describe global supply
chains structurally, as translation machines, as did study groups at the
University of Toronto (where | was invited by Tania Li) and at the Uni-
versity of Minnesota (where I was invited by Karen Ho). I feel privileged
to have had a short moment of encouragement from Julie Graham be-
fore her death. The “economic diversity” perspective that she pioneered
with Kathryn Gibson helped not just me but many scholars. On ques-
tions of power and difference, Santa Cruz conversations with James