100% found this document useful (4 votes)
1K views10 pages

Social Security (Defrauding The American People, The British Connection)

Social Security (Defrauding the American People, the British Connection) Collection: Freedom Documents From: keystoliberty2.wordpress.com
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (4 votes)
1K views10 pages

Social Security (Defrauding The American People, The British Connection)

Social Security (Defrauding the American People, the British Connection) Collection: Freedom Documents From: keystoliberty2.wordpress.com
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

SOCIAL SECURITY

(Defrauding the American


People, the
British Connection)

19 WednesdayOCT 2011
POSTED BY EOWYNDBH IN UNCATEGORIZED
≈ 3 COMMENTS
Tags
Sovereign, sovereign documents, sovereignty

DEFRAUDING OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: BACKGROUND AND HISTORY

QUEEN ELIZABETH IS THE PRINCIPLE OVER THE SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:

S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
Made 22nd of July 1997, coming into force 1st of September 1997; at the Court of
Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty in
pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration

Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf,
is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order,
and it is hereby ordered as follows:
“This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order
1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.”

Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in
court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine
words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.

Remember, King George was the “Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy
Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America.” See: Treaty of Peace
(1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope is in
charge of the USA ‘plantation.’

What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George
were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install
a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid.
is a corporation
First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES
and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See
Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)

Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England;
he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans
that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to
July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money which is due
January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not incredible the King
funded both sides of the War. But there was more work that needed to be done.
Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781
states in Article 12 “All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts
contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the
United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and
considered a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction
whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.”

Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more
than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet.
Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis,
Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of
Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but there is a call for
another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the following year with the express
purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation.

On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in
Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something
had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so
called founding fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States
because it was Bankrupt.

On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution. The
States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by
simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt-
Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to
the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the
Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote. On August 4th, 1790 an
Act was passed which was Titled: -An Act making provision for the payment of the
Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages
138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created
the Districts. If you don’t believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts,
here in Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion
of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments
which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to
legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never
submitted to the people for a vote, thus enabling the governments who wrote new
constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote, thereby binding the people
to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State
where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a
member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.

What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other words, a Person.


“Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person.” 9 F. Supp. 272
Word “person” does not include state. 12 Op Atty. Gen 176.

There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a
corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist
in your mind. They are images in your mind that speak to you. We labor,
pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.

Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.

Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid, it states: All Debts
contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as
under the Confederation.

Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article one section eight clause two,
which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the
United States. This was needed so the United States (Which went into
Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States
were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.

The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791.
This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which 18,000
were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in
exchange for Securities of the United States.

Now the creditors of the United States which included the King wanted paid the
Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander
Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so
George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax which they did. This
has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the Militia’s duty to collect
taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off of the people if the people are
not a party to the Constitution? I’ll tell you how. The people are slaves! The
United States belongs to the floundering fathers and their posterity and Great
Britain. America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How
many times have you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and
then the Judge tells him he can’t? It is because you are not a party to it. We are
SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don’t believe read Paddleboard, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and
Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states “But, indeed,
no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a
breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a
party to it.”

Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) which
states that it is the militia’s job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read
Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to provide for organizing,
arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such part of them as may be
employed in the service of the United States…. the Militia is not there to protect
you and me, it is there to collect our substance.

As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to
guard the King’s commerce and make us slaves.

If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find “The Treaty of Amity,
Commerce and Navigation.” This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794
which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King’s
Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was,
he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The
troops were still on American soil because; quite frankly the King wanted them
here.

Here is the key to where this started:

Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the
entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT
SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:

“Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and
country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the
enactments of the Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted
everything contained in Talmud. The sages, who adopted the enactments and
decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the decisions, and derived the laws,
constituted all or most of the Sages of Israel. It is they who received the
tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in unbroken succession going
back to Moses, our teacher.”

We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject
Index, Mammon is defined as (“Civil law and procedure”).

Now turn to the “The Shetars Effect on English Law” — A Law of the Jews Becomes
the Law of the Land, found in “The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-
1200.” It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of
the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law
of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land,
which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit
agreement — the Jewish Shetar is a lien on all property (realty) and today it’s
called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great
Britain and the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.

We are living under the Babylonian Talmud; it is where all of our problems come
from. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope,
Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind
control; people are taught to believe in things that do not exist.

Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I’m sorry people, you are
not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the
ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact,
but he is not a party to it.” Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the
City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520

You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United
States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to
explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty
and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget
about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So
you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case
dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue
a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not
a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to
use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS.
Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are
not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no
property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here
are just a couple of examples:

“The primary control and custody of infant is with the government.” Tillman V.
Roberts. 108 So. 62

“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties- the husband, the wife
and the state.” Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called


“ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and
use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the
State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st Session, (Brown v. Welch
supra)… You own no Property because you are a slave. Really you are worse off
than a slave because you are also a debtor.

“The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable


right, is one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and
never can exist under government.” Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378,
481

Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an
Agency of the United States Government.

All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By using IRS
Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking series which shows
the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers fall under a 300-
399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399
which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax
Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce
and are held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to
the U.K. The form that is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-
Foreign Investment Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law
Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3. The OMB’s-paper-Office of
Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury, List of Active
Information collections, Approved under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form
8288 is found, under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. withholding tax
return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.

These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred
Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040
form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K.
Tax Treaty Claims. Isn’t it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to
the U.K. Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one
liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it
is debt collection through a private contract called the Constitution of the United
States Article Six, Section One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an
income tax when the machine gets connected to its udders? The answer is no.
I have never known a cow that owns property or has been compensated for its
labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever produced. You don’t even own
your labor or yourself. Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are
allowed to retain a small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing
shelter and most of all breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the
other slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an extremist,
terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are anti-government.
When the truth of the matter is you just don’t want to be a slave. But, you do not
have the right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely
up to them. If they want to bow down and worship corporations, let them. The
United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not the problem, it is the other
slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be-slaves were gone. The United
States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist, because no one would
acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are in power are
also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free
healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to
disarm them. I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How
can you disagree with the government passing out birth control? I hope the
breeding of slaves stops or at the very least slows down.

You see, we are cows, the IRS is the company who milks the cows and the United
States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd, and Great Britain is the
Owner of the farm in fee- simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope.

Now to Rome:
“Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep
nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high
contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective
states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating
their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of
the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope
for what he has already done for them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their
views of submitting the nations.” Article (3) Treaty of Verona (1822).

If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he
must be obeyed. Bened. XIV, De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844.
Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed
by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal
Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States may be
abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law
Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown that the Pope rules the world?

The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213,
Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.

You have to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind.
When your mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great
Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional entities
which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your slavery was
because you believed a lie.

(Within the next few weeks I’ll post a remedy to get money returned)
RELATED
Buck Act - The Jurisdiction of the Land In "31 C.F.R. 52.2"
The Emergency Powers of Martial Law (Historical Outline) In "16th Amendment"
The Initinere (Document) In "Admiralty Act"

You might also like