Transformation of Vernacular Houses in Coastal Andhra Pradesh
Transformation of Vernacular Houses in Coastal Andhra Pradesh
Abstract
Dwellings in rural areas of India are examples of indigenous construction
techniqueswhich were evolved from time to time. Architecture is understood to be a result
of informed decisions taken by the people based on beliefs, geography, geology and
climate. Thus, residential dwellings of rural areas are a result of time tested beliefs,
climate, locally available building materials and socio-economic aspects of the respective
regions. Vernacular architecture is closely related to culture, climate, materials and
construction techniques of a time and place. However, the present trend of globalisation
and industrialisation has led to changes in various aspects like availability of building
materials, urge to tide along with modern building styles as well as construction
techniques, lack of skilled human resources who can execute old construction methods
using old materials, finishes etc. The reasons for transformation may vary from place to
place and from one case to the other more as a response to available means and actual
needs of every place. The users may be or may not be in favour of transformation but the
physical fact is that transformation is observed in vernacular houses. In the said scenario,
it is pertinent and rational to ascertain the level of acceptance of people towards
vernacular houses. The purpose of this paper is to describe the scenario and causes of
transformation of vernacular houses in selected districts of coastal Andhra Pradesh of
India and ascertain the level of attachment of people to vernacular houses.
1. Introduction
Vernacular architecture is the regional or local lingo, the common language of the
particular region or a building form. Vernacular architecture of a region is the
development of relationships among economic, social factors, climatic conditions, culture
and technology prevalent in that region. The globalisation had a major impact on the
human lives, since the beginning of the 21st century. We humans put a continuous effort
in bringing more and more comfort and convenience into our daily life style, as a result of
which is the continuous transformation patterns observed over time in different regions.
Vernacular architecture is transforming or evolving over ages as a result of trial and error
methods. Yash S. Khandekar (2017) [12] opines that it is the informal functional
architecture of structures, often in rural areas of India, built of local materials and
designed to meet the needs of local people. Deniz ErġNsel Önder (2010) [3] mentions that
“Home reflects a person’s view, and his or her place and status in the society and
collectively contains a different meaning than shelter” while according to Bachelard
(1964), home is defined as the nucleus of one’s personal space. Arias (1993) [2] asserts
that meaning of home is variable, depending on the perception of the user. Smith (1994)
[11] discusses about the necessity of continuation, self-expression, personal or family’
identity and social relations for a shelter to become the home.
India is one the oldest civilizations of the world. The building traditions of a particular
region are not static but keeps on transforming or evolving with time, with due integration
of the changing circumstances where the building forms also adapt to and reflect the
changing needs. Oxford institute for sustainable development estimated that over 90% of
current structures throughout the world has been designed by the users itself (P.Oliver,
2003 [8]; Ramesh, 2016 [10]) number of dwellings estimated according to this is about
800 million (A.S Dill, 2010 [1]). Vernacular architecture can be explained as a style of
architecture where design decisions are influenced by tradition, cultural significance and
climate responsiveness. Vernacular architecture varies from place to place according to
the topography, local materials and technical knowhow (P Jayasudha, 2014 [7]; Ramesh,
2015 [9]).
Kotharkar, R (2012) [5] points that transformations of settlements whether urban rural
or tribal, is an inevitable phenomenon. But changes occurring in the past were natural and
took place from within. It was a gradual process and occurred with due respect to climate,
community and cultural needs as a process of refinement. With the forces of
modernization, the societies have witnessed the change in their patterns of living, which is
more intense in the developing countries. To understand the direction of growth, it is
imperative to map the pattern of change seeking clues for future trends. The
transformation may be quantitatively partial if its due to the repairable state of an existing
vernacular house or it be full if it’s a new additional construction beside the existing
vernacular house. The said transformation may be observed with reference to Plan, Walls,
Openings, Roofing, Flooring, Columns / Beams (Struc. Supports), Mouldings, exterior
open spaces like Courtyard, Outside seating, Manduva and other visual features. In
addition, the transformation in the aforementioned components may be in terms of the
material used, ornamentation, colour, finish etc.
The transformed houses may bear resemblance to the vernacular houses despite the use
of new materials and construction techniques or they may be a totally different typology.
Thus, the reasons for transformation in vernacular houses vary from place to place and
from one case to the other, more as a response to available means and actual needs of
every place. The users may be or may not be in favour of transformation but the physical
fact is that transformation is observed in vernacular houses. In the said scenario, it is
pertinent and rational to ascertain the level of acceptance of people towards vernacular
houses. Deniz ErġNsel Önder (2010) [3] demonstrated the use of t-test, Mann-Whitney U
test and chi-square test for measuring user participation and degree of satisfaction in the
context of after-earthquake houses in Düzce, Turkey.
In this context, vernacular houses in Pippara village of West Godavari district and
Ghantasala village of Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh (A.P) were studied for mapping
the transformations. Location of the selected villages is presented as Figure 1. A brief
introduction and the scenario of transformation of each of the said locations is presented
chronologically with Culture, climate and tradition which are understandably integral part
of vernacular architecture. Hence, focus of this paper is on physical aspects of the
transformations which took place in existing vernacular houses, and on ascertaining the
acceptance and attachment of people to vernacular houses.
Pippara
Ghantasala
Source:https://www.google.com/maps/place/Pippara,+Andhra+Pradesh+534197/@16.717
0341,79.3038334,7z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x3a37caed0fa1b5dd:0x57ec58c362185ef8!8m2!
3d16.7108663!4d81.5418158, accessed 29.10.19
3.1 Climate
It falls in the hot and humid climate region with relatively longer duration of the year
bearing Summer season.
3.2 Culture
This village is an example of rich culture and tradition. One can observe the traditional
aspects of design in many of the village settlements in this region. The streets follow
Grid-iron pattern as shown in Figure 1. There is a gradual transformation in the spatial
organisation of previously existing plans, in line with the changing needs of users from
time to time. The apparent reason may be the changing socio economic condition of the
people and other circumstances.
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-Pippara-Village-with-grid-iron-
Street-pattern_fig1_315597555 accessed on 24.10.2019
A dwelling of nearly 100 years age has been studied for its transformation over a
period of time. The dwelling built up area is nearly 500 sq.m on a plot admeasuring nearly
1000 sq.m. A joint family occupies the house and the principal bread earner is a third-
generation farmer.
The elements which depict the vernacular character are namely, the exterior semi-open
spaces, detached kitchen, wooden carvings, ceiling drops, wooden columns, terracotta
tiled roof, Manduva, overall ornamentation etc. Details are presented in Table 1. A few
key aspects, which characterise the selected house, are as follows:
Mud for wall construction
Mud is used in the form of sun-dried bricks’ leading to a 35-45 cm thick wall. The
houses extend a good thermal comfort where the difference between indoor and
ambient air temperature levels is more than 7 degrees Celsius, during the discomfort
hours of average hottest day in the hottest month of May.
Lime for mortar and plaster
Raathi sunnam as its locally called is used for mortar as well as fine plaster for the
walls. This is also considered as one of the factors to aid the indoor thermal comfort.
Pitched roof
The vernacular houses in the village are predominantly pitch roofed with terracotta
tiles wooden rafters. The clear height of the ridge is 4-5 metres, depending upon the
size of the main living area of the house and also as per the economic condition of the
house owner of the then time.
Manduva / internal courtyard
This is a puncture in the pitched roof through which rain water is collected into a pit
dug on the floor of the living room. This internal courtyard is in addition to the front,
rear and side courtyards.
Spatial organisation
The whole dwelling has two detached portions each measuring of 355 Sq.M and 110
Sq.M, used for living and kitchen portion has space for cooking, dining and storage of
grains and grocery.
Roofing of verandah
Purlins with insulated
planks
Roof drops
Cornice work
and
4 Painting to stop termite
underside of
attack.
the ceiling
Ornamental drop to
protect from the direct
beam
Security grills
Roof drop in timber
painted in blue (synthetic
enamel paint).
Rear profile Iron grill in MS fixed at
6
of the house 750 mm level on a low
wall, plastered with cow
dung.
Place for washing dishes
and clothes
Cut-out covered to
collect the rain water and
to dispose with the help
Roofing and of a PVC pipe.
7 lighting - sky Cut-out covered with a
light disk for glazing
Central place of a house
and slits for ventilation
Rooms on either side
Cut-out covered with
disc
Drain pipe to collect the
rain water into the floor
Manduva and dispose further
(Transformed Glazing all around the
8
from open water collection disk for
courtyard) daylighting
Redoxide mixed cement
concrete flooring
Stone slab to cover the
water harvesting pit
Bracing in timber
Structural
Floral carving work
10 support and
depicting
treatments
Stage-I (Plan form, Roof form): As learnt from the house owner, the plan form of
the house in the year 1960 or Stage-I is presented as Figure 3. By the said year, the
house had eight rooms altogether, including Kitchen and Store rooms in the
detached portion of the overall house. The house had a central courtyard which was
the focal point of the house, where people of the house gathered for various
domestic and social activities. Roof of the house at Stage-I is presented as Figure 5.
Stage-II (Plan form, Roof form): The plan of the house at Stage-II in the year 1990
is presented as Figure 4. The transformation happened in spatial organisation or
plan form as well as in the roof form. Transformation from Stage-I to Stage-II is as
follows:
o A full-fledged Living room has been laid out in the place of Puja room,
Bedroom and part of internal courtyard
o Study room on the north west has been converted into a bedroom
o Paddy room beside the Kitchen on the south east has been converted into Dining
room including the modification of toilets on the south west
o Form of the earlier roof was rectangular with an oblong cut-out above the
central courtyard. However, owing to the change in the plan form, the roof in
Stage-II which was rectangular with the oblong cut-out was replaced by two
smaller square cut-outs. Roof of the house at Stage-II is presented as Figure 6
Stage-III (Roof form): Transformation was only in the roof form but not in the plan
form. Roof form at Stage-III is presented as Figure 7. Transformation of roof form
from Stage-II to Stage-III is as follows:
o Form of the earlier roof as in Stage-II with two cut-outs of a square form
remained the same
o However, the both the cut-outs are converted into Manduva for collection of
rain water
o Sections showing the transformation from Stage-I to Stage-III is presented as
Figure 8
As per the stage-wise transformation described above, there was a transformation in the
plan form, roof form and internal spatial volume. However, there is no transformation in
terms of building material, construction technique and finishes. This was understandably
due to the attachment, willingness and affordability of the house owner to sustain the
vernacular construction process despite the problem of non-availability of skilled labour
as well as the high expenditure involved in the process of retention of the vernacular
character.
4.1 Climate
It falls in the hot and humid climate region with relatively longer duration of the year
bearing Summer season.
4.2 Culture
Ghantasala village is one of the prime transit centres of trade in the region due to its
proximity to river Krishna, Machilipatnam and Vijayawada. Limestone columns
belonging to the hypostyle halls of Buddhist monasteries dating to 2nd BCE have been
discovered in and around the place. There are Buddhist edifices like Stupa and many
Hindu worshipping places which indicate the past glory of Ghantasala village. However,
it can be said that there is no visible influence of Buddhist architecture on the built fabric
of the village.
A dwelling of nearly 60 years age has been studied for its transformation over a period
of time. The dwelling built up area is nearly 400 sq.m on a plot admeasuring nearly 700
sq.m. The house is owned by a joint family and the principal bread earner is a third-
generation farmer.
The elements which depict the vernacular character are namely, the exterior semi-open
spaces, outdoor seating / Arugu, wooden carvings, ceiling drops, wooden columns,
terracotta tiled roof, Manduva, overall ornamentation etc. Details are presented in Table 2.
Mud (locally called Paati Mannu / mud) is used in the form of baked or unbaked bricks
for wall bearing 45-60 cm thickness, wood for openings and mouldings, Napa stone for
floor, lime for mortar and plaster. A few key aspects which characterise the vernacular
style of the village are as follows:
Outdoor seating /
Arugu adjoining the
View of the boundary wall
1 house from Flat roof on the front
abutting road portion and
terracotta tiled roof
on the later portion
Front verandah
Front view of Newly added tin
3
the house sheet roofed parking
area
Traditional teak
wood main entrance
door and frame
Teak wood windows
on either side of the
main entrance door
4 Entrance door Locally available
Naapa stone for
flooring
Aloe Vera plant
hung to the ceiling to
keep bad omen at
bay
Flat Roof of
verandah (left) with
wooden rafters,
terracotta flat tiles
and madras terracing
Pitched Roof Truss
5 Roof types
of inner house
(right) with wooden
rafters, plain wooden
strips for the
underside and clay
pan tiles atop
The house underwent transformation in three different stages since the year 1961, till
date. The transformation was in terms of additional built up area which in turn lead to
transformation in the overall roof form as well as the internal spatial volume. The same is
presented in the Figures 8 and 9.
Stage-I (Plan form, Roof form): As learnt from the house owner, transformation of
the house is as follows:
o The original house has pitched roof with clay tiles and wooden truss. A
bedroom was added on the south west portion in the year 1978 due to reasons of
Vaastu. The extended portion of the house has the same character of that of the
main house in terms of building materials used, construction technique
employed, roof form and finish.
Stage-II (Plan form, Roof form): The house was extended on the north in the year
2000, to accommodate additional rooms on the front portion.
o This resulted in the reduction of front open courtyard.
o Roof of the extended portion is flat with wooden rafters and madras terracing
atop while the old one has pitched roof.
o A staircase has also been added to access the terrace.
Stage-III (Plan form, Roof form): A small steel structure was added recently on the
north west portion of the house for car parking.
o Materials used are steel columns for support and moulded tin sheet for the roof
cover
o This is a transformation in terms of materials used as well as the overall
aesthetic appeal
As per the stage-wise transformation described above, there was a transformation in the
plan form, roof form and internal spatial volume. There was also a transformation in
terms of building material, construction technique and finishes. The house owner said that
the house requires periodical upkeep of the wooden members and all other vernacular
elements and the expenditure is high. Even if one can afford the said expenditure,
sourcing skilled labour and vernacular building materials is a challenge and is time-
consuming. Due to the said constraints, he was forced to undertake the building
extensions in a way that was convenient for him from time to time. This scenario lead to a
doubt whether at all there is people’s acceptance and attachment to vernacular
components, vernacular houses etc. in the present day context. To ascertain the
acceptance and attachment of the house owner in particular, a test was conducted as part
of personal interview with the help of a questionnaire.
Questions were asked to the users of the house about their attachment towards the
original house and towards transformed house in terms of Plan, Openings, Roofing,
Flooring, Columns / Beams (Structural Support), Mouldings, Outside seating, Manduva,
Walls and Open space. Response of the owner was scored on Likert scale and ‘Critical – t’
test was conducted using the scores.
the transformed house is not to the satisfaction of the inhabitants. If the Absolute value of
't' is lesser than critical 't', then it can be construed that the transformed house is to the
satisfaction of the inhabitants.
Acknowledgements
The Author thanks the members of the house for allowing the documentation, for sharing
their valuable and unbiased opinions regarding their attachment to the original vernacular
house and the transformed vernacular house.
REFERENCES
[1] A.S Dill, M. N., Passive environment control system of Kerala vernacular residential architecture.
Energy and Buildings, (2010).
[2] Arias, E.G., 1993. “Housing Preferences and Their Intensity, The Meaning and Use of Housing:
International Perspectives, Approaches and Their Application”, Ed. Ariasi E.G., Avebury, England.
Bachelard, The Poetics of Space, New York: Orion Press, (1964).
[3] Deniz ErġNsel Önder., Emine KöseoğLu., Ömer BġLen., Venhar Der., “The effect of user
participation in satisfaction: Beyciler after-earthquake houses in Düzce”, Istanbul Technical
University Journal ITU A|Z - 7/1, (2010).
[4] Karthik Chadalavada., K. Naga Viswatej., Dr. Ramesh, S., 2017. “Analyzing Vernacular Sustainable
Design Principles- A Case Study of a Vernacular Dwelling in Godavari Region of Andhra Pradesh,
IndiaInternational Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, (2017), pp 5010-5017.
[5] Kotharkar, R., Deshpande, Roopal., “A Comparative Study of Transformations in Traditional House
Form: The Case of Nagpur Region, India” Journal of the International Society for the Study of
Vernacular Settlements, 2(2), (2012) p. 33.
[6] Malouf Belz, M, 2012. “Spirit of place and the evolution of the vernacular house in Kinnaur,
Himachal Pradesh, India”, Ph.D dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, (2012).
[7] P Jayasudha, M. D. (2014). A Study on Sustainable Design Principles : A Case study of Vernacular
Dwelling in Tanjaore Region of Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge .
[8] P.Oliver., The Vernacular House World Wide. Dwellings, (2003).
[9] Ramesh, S., “Initiatives in Climate Responsive and Energy Efficient Architecture” First International
Conference for Sustainable Development and Management, promoted by Hong Kong University of
Science and Technology, (2015).
[10] Ramesh, S., “Energy Efficient Landscape for Thermal Comfort in Buildings and Built-Up Areas”,
International Journal of Engineering and Technology,Vol.8, N0:5, (2016), pp 338 to 344.
[11] Smith., The essential Qualities of a Home, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 14, no1, (1994)
pp. 31-46.
[12] Yash S. Khandekar., Ojas P. Rahate., Ashish B. Gawande., Kartik A. Sirsilla., Sakshi M. Govindani.,
2017. Vernacular architecture in India: International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology Volume: 04, Issue: 05, (2017).