Tutorial 1 - 2021 Summer
Tutorial 1 - 2021 Summer
TUTORIAL QUESTIONS 1
ii. Mrs Waker has been the Engagement Partner for a client, Stewart Ltd, for nine years. He
has excellent knowledge of the client and knows all the directors of Stewart very well.
Stewart is listed on the Jamaica Stock Exchange.
Required: (4 marks)
a) Explain the ethical threats which may affect the independence of Checkers in respect of
each of the client audits.
b) For each threat explain how it may be reduced.
3. For the situation below (1) decide whether the ICAJ Code of Ethics has been violated or not
and (2) briefly explain how the situation violates or does not violate the Code. (2 marks)
i. Audit Firm Low found out that Audit Firm High is interested in being the auditor for
one of its client. For the upcoming 2017 audit, Audit Firm Low quotes a lower fee
than was charged for the audit last year to remain competitive.
Violation? Yes No
Explanation:
4. You are an audit manager of Peach & Herb audit firm. You have recently been assigned the
audit of Diamond Ltd (Diamond), a public interest entity. Your audit associate has
highlighted some of the potential risks to independence in respect of the audit as follows:
i. The audit engagement partner’s daughter works for Diamond.
ii. Audit fees from Diamond is significant to Peach & Herb.
iii. Overdue fee exists.
iv. Peaches and Herb has been asked to provide accountancy services.
Required: (4 marks)
For each of the above risks identify the correct threat(s) to independence to which each
relates.
Page 1 of 2
University of the West Indies, Mona
Department of Management Studies
AACT3043 – Auditing I – Semester I
TUTORIAL QUESTIONS 1
5. Section 9.22 of the ICAJ Code states that Family relationships which always pose an
unacceptable threat to independence are those in which an officer or senior employee of an
audit client is closely connected to a member in public practice or an employee engaged on
the assignment. Who is said to be closely connected to an auditor? (2 marks)
6. Read the scenario and answer the requirements below:
Required
a) Given the firm did not have any problem paying the higher bill, would Nathan's
planned course of action be ethical? Why or why not?
b) What other course of action might be available to Nathan? Which do you think would
be the best course of action for him to take?
Page 2 of 2