4.-Chap-3 Assignment DTUT Part2
4.-Chap-3 Assignment DTUT Part2
Please read the following instructions carefully before working on the assignment
HDViet runs a canteen that provide food for students of IU and other nearby universities. A new
dish of Sping rolls is sold for $10 and costs $8 to prepare. At present HDViet must decided in
advance how many dishs to prepare each day (40, 50, 60 or 70). Actual demand will also be 40,
50, 60 or 70 each day.
Quantitative Methods for Business_ Ms. Dang Thi Uyen Thao 2
DEMAND
40 50 60 70
40 80 80 80 80
SUPPLY 50 0 100 100 100
60 80 20 120 120
70 160 -60 40 140
1. Given the probability of the demand of 40, 50, 60 and 70 each day is 10%, 20%, 40% and
30%, respectively. What do you recommend?
2. Suppose a new ordering system is being considered, whereby students are advised to order
their dish online the day before. With this new system HDViet may predict the daily demand
24 hours in advance. They can adjust production levels on a daily basis. How much should
this system worth to HDViet?
3. Sometimes HDViet may face the regret of not picking the best solution. What do you
recommend HDViet in order to minimize its expected oppotunity loss?
Question 2
Two states of nature exist for a particular situation: a good economy and a poor economy. An
economic study may be performed to obtain more information about which of these will
actually occur in the coming year. The study may forecast either a good economy or a poor
economy. Currently there is a 65% chance that the economy will be good. In the past,
whenever the economy was good, the economic study predicted it would be good 72% of the
time. In the past, whenever the economy was poor, the economic study predicted it would be
poor 84% of the time.
a. Find the following:
P(good economy|prediction of good economy)
P(poor economy|prediction of good economy)
P(good economy|prediction of poor economy)
P(poor economy|prediction of poor economy)
b. Suppose the initial (prior) probability of a good economy is 75% (instead of 65%). Find
the posterior probabilities in part a based on these new values.
Question 3
Mr. Denmark is thinking about either building a quadplex (a building with four apartments),
building a duplex, or simply doing nothing. Mr. Denmark is also thinking about hiring his old
marketing professor to conduct a marketing research study. If the study is conducted, the study
could be positive or negative, but it would cost him $3,000. Mr. Denmark believes that there
is a 50–50 chance that the information will be positive. If the rental market is favorable, he
will earn $15,000 with the quadplex or $5,000 with the duplex. He doesn’t have the financial
resources to do both. With an unfavorable rental market, however, Mr. Denmark could lose
$20,000 with the quadplex or $10,000 with the duplex. Without conducting the market
research study, Mr. Denmark estimates that the probability of a favorable rental market is 0.6.
Based on historical data, there is a 0.8 probability that the marketing research will be positive
given a favorable rental market. Moreover, there is a 0.7 probability that the marketing
research will be negative given an unfavorable rental market. Of course, Mr. Denmark could
forget all of these numbers and do nothing.
a. Draw the decision tree
b. What is your advice to Mr. Denmark?
Quantitative Methods for Business_ Ms. Dang Thi Uyen Thao 4
Question 4
Unfortunately, a homemade ketchup only preserves its highest quality level in a very short
period of about one month. If it is not sold after the batch run, the remaining units of ketchup
that lose much of their special flavor are sold to local convenient stores at $16 per unit.
Furthermore, Norway has guaranteed to his suppliers that there will always be an adequate
supply of ketchup at the fixed price. If the ketchup in his inventory does run out, he has agreed
to get products from his brothers’ company at the same price he sells $20 per unit, plus
transportation costs of $1 per unit.
** In case supply > demand, there are units that are not demanded from restaurants but can be sold at lower
price to local convenience store.
** In case supply < demand, there are units that were not produced to meet all the need, so Norway must
outsource at $20 (and $1 logistic cost) and in turn sell to restaurants at same price as before.
** The cost of obtaining quality inspection is per batch produced, not per unit produced