Scribd
Upload
862 views1 page

Sabena Belgian World Vs Ca

SABENA BELGIAN WORLD AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS and MA. PAULA SAN AGUSTIN, respondents. Ma. Paula was a passenger on a flight from Casablanca to Brussels to Manila operated by Sabena Belgian World Airlines. She checked luggage containing valuables and was issued a tag, but the luggage went missing upon her arrival in Manila. Sabena was found to have acted with wanton negligence and lack of care based on the luggage going missing twice. International treaties state airlines are liable for unlimited damages with proof of willful misconduct, which applied in this case. Therefore, Sabena Belgian World Airlines was found liable for damages

Uploaded by

phgmb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
862 views1 page

Sabena Belgian World Vs Ca

SABENA BELGIAN WORLD AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS and MA. PAULA SAN AGUSTIN, respondents. Ma. Paula was a passenger on a flight from Casablanca to Brussels to Manila operated by Sabena Belgian World Airlines. She checked luggage containing valuables and was issued a tag, but the luggage went missing upon her arrival in Manila. Sabena was found to have acted with wanton negligence and lack of care based on the luggage going missing twice. International treaties state airlines are liable for unlimited damages with proof of willful misconduct, which applied in this case. Therefore, Sabena Belgian World Airlines was found liable for damages

Uploaded by

phgmb
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SABENA BELGIAN WORLD AIRLINES, 

petitioner, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS and MA. PAULA SAN


AGUSTIN, respondents.

FACTS: Ma. Paula was a passenger on board the flight of SABENA BELGIAN WORLD airline originating
from Casablanca to Brussels on her way back to Manila.

Ma. Paula checked in her luggage which contained her valuables for which she was issued a tag number.
She stayed overnight in Brussels and her luggage was left on board the flight.

She arrived at Manila International Airport and immediately submitted her Tag No. 71423 to facilitate
the release of her luggage but the luggage was missing. She was advised to accomplish and submit a
property Irregularity Report which she submitted and filed on the same day.

She followed up her claim but the luggage remained to be missing. She filed her formal complaint. At the
time of the filing of the complaint, the luggage with its content has not been found.

ISSUE: Whether the airline is liable for damages in this case?

RULING: YES.

The "loss of said baggage not only once but twice "underscores the wanton negligence and lack of care"
on the part of the carrier.

The Warsaw Convention denies to the carrier availment of the provisions which exclude or limit his
liability, if the damage is caused by his wilful misconduct or by such default on his part as, in accordance
with the law of the court seized of the case, is considered to be equivalent to wilful misconduct, or if the
damage is (similarly) caused . . . by any agent of the carrier acting within the scope of his employment.

The Hague Protocol amended the Warsaw Convention by removing the provision that if the airline took
all necessary steps to avoid the damage, it could exculpate itself completely, and declaring the stated
limits of liability not applicable if it is proved that the damage resulted from an act or omission of the
carrier, its servants or agents, done with intent to cause damage or recklessly and with knowledge that
damage would probably result. The same deletion was effected by the Montreal Agreement of 1966,
with the result that a passenger could recover unlimited damages upon proof of wilful misconduct.

Hence, Sabena Belgian World Airlines is liable for damages in this case.

You might also like