0-7803-7846-6/03/$17.00 02003 Ieee 60
0-7803-7846-6/03/$17.00 02003 Ieee 60
2 GHz Dual-band
Operation
Introduction
The rapid developments in the wireless communications industry
demand novel designs that can be used in more than one frequency band
and in size reduction. Wireless local area network (WLAN), wireless
printers and the PCMCIA card all utilize the 2.4 GHz band. It will be
soon followed by the 5.2 GHz technologies; HIPERLAN and IEEE
802.1 la will have dramatic effects in the near future. IEEE 802.1 1
WLAN standards specify the operating bands as WLAN (2400-2484
MHz) and HIPERLAN (5 150-5350 MHz:). For wireless communication,
a dual frequency antenna is needed for simultaneously transmitting and
receiving these two bands. To meet the requirements for the 2.4/5.2 GHz
applications, some printed novel antennas [l, 21 are reported. The
antenna in [ 11 uses a microstrip-fed double-sided printed dipole antenna,
which is embedded inside the cover of a laptop computer. The antenna
radiates bi-directionally and has its dipole length near one wavelength.
The 10 dB bandwidths achieved were 18.'7 and 7.7% at 2.4 and 5.2 GHz,
respectively. The antenna in [2] is constructed by folding a planar
monopole, made of a copper plate, into a rectangular-disk-like structure.
The length of main resonant path is about 34% of the wavelength at 2.4
GHz, which is larger than one-quarter wavelength at resonant for a
conventional straight monopole antenna. The 10 dB bandwidths
achieved were 5.3 and 8.1%at 2.4 and 5.2 GHz, respectively.
Presented in this Letter is a new microstrip-fed dual frequency
printed L-shaped monopole antenna, which can be used in one radiating
element with two operating frequencies in the 2.4 and 5.2 GHz bands.
The length of the antenna's larger strip can controls the lower operating
mode of the propose antenna, while the length of the smaller strip is
designed to generate a resonant mode for the upper operating mode at
5.2 GHz. The proposed antenna can easily be excited by a 5042
microstrip line, good impedance matching can be obtained for operating
frequencies within both the WLAN and HIPERLAN bands.
Antenna Configuration
The structure of the microstrip-fed uniplanar L-shaped monopole
61
small gain variations are also observed.
References
[ I ] Y. H. Suh and K. Chang, “Low cost microstrip-fed dual frequency
printed dipole antenna for wireless communications, ” Electron Lett.,
vol. 36, pp. 1177-1 179,2000.
[2] F. S. Chang and K. L. Wong, “Planar monopole folded into a
rectangular-disk-like structure as surface-mountable antenna for
2.415.2-GHz dual-band operation,” Microwave Opt Techno1 Lett.
Vol. 34, pp. 166-169,2002.
[3] IE3D user’s manual, Zeland Software, Inc., Aug. 1998.
U 50 mrn -
/I
I 4Z
I
I
J
T
20 mrn
62
Fig. 2 Simulateddistributions of electric currents at the L-shaped strip:
(4.h @)fr.
2470W -measured
-35 _ _ _ _ simulated
4 . ,
2 o o o 3 R l o 4 w o m m
Fig. 3 Measured and simulated retum loss for the proposed antennas:
& = 4.2, h = 1.6 mm, Wf=3.16 mm .
'I
1
0 1 0
2JxI 24W 2503 2603 2700 YXO
trequency. MM hequew.MM
(4 (b)
Fig. 4 Measured antenna gain :(a)fi (b)S,.
63