0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views1 page

Individual Report Rubric: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

The rubric evaluates individual reports on five levels from 1 to 5 in three assessment objectives: 1) Research, analysis and evaluation of the question and perspectives. Higher levels analyze more perspectives, issues, and make better comparisons and conclusions. 2) Reflection on personal perspectives, with higher levels justifying perspectives with more evidence and reasoning. 3) Communication and structure of the report. Higher levels have clearer structure and presentation of arguments, as well as more complete citation of sources.

Uploaded by

Ramisha Atif
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views1 page

Individual Report Rubric: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

The rubric evaluates individual reports on five levels from 1 to 5 in three assessment objectives: 1) Research, analysis and evaluation of the question and perspectives. Higher levels analyze more perspectives, issues, and make better comparisons and conclusions. 2) Reflection on personal perspectives, with higher levels justifying perspectives with more evidence and reasoning. 3) Communication and structure of the report. Higher levels have clearer structure and presentation of arguments, as well as more complete citation of sources.

Uploaded by

Ramisha Atif
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Individual Report Rubric

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5


1-8 9-16 17-24 25-32 33-40
AO1 Research, Formulates a global question. Formulates a global question that can be answered Formulates a global question that can be answered Formulates a focused global question that can be Formulates a focused global question that can be
analysis and Presents some relevant information. from consideration of from consideration of the perspectives (local and/or answered from consideration of the perspectives (local answered from consideration of the perspectives (local
evaluation - In Identifies some relevant causes and/or consequences at least one perspective. national and global), and different and/or national and global), and and/or national and global), and different viewpoints
answering the of issues. Researches and analyses information from different viewpoints within these. different viewpoints within these. within these.
question, the Proposes course(s) of action but these may be perspectives. Researches and analyses a range of information from Researches and analyses an appropriate range of Researches and analyses a balanced range of relevant
candidate: irrelevant or limited. Analyses some of the causes and/or consequences of different perspectives. relevant information from different information from different perspectives.
Evaluates sources of information but this is limited. relevant issues and sometimes Analyses the causes and consequences of relevant perspectives. Analyses in depth the causes and consequences of
makes appropriate comparisons, one or two of which are issues and makes appropriate Analyses in some depth the causes and consequences relevant issues and makes pertinent, well thought-out and
well thought-out. comparisons although these are not always well thought- of relevant issues and makes successful comparisons.
Proposes relevant course(s) of action, with some out. appropriate and well thought-out comparisons. Proposes well-developed and relevant course(s) of
attempt at drawing conclusions Proposes relevant but not always developed course(s) Proposes developed and relevant course(s) of action, action, drawing clear and fully supported conclusions.
some of which are appropriate. of action, drawing conclusions drawing clear and supported Evaluates a range of appropriate and contrasting
Evaluates some appropriate sources of information to which are appropriate but some of which may not be conclusions. sources of information to fully support the arguments
partially support the arguments adequately supported. Evaluates a range of appropriate and contrasting made.
made. Evaluates a range of appropriate sources of sources of information to support the
information to support the arguments arguments made.
made.
1 2 3 4 5
AO2 Reflection Limited justification of personal perspective(s). Some justification of personal perspective(s) using some Justifies personal perspective(s) using some evidence or Justifies personal perspective(s) using some evidence Justifies personal perspective(s) using full evidence and
- When writing evidence or reasoning. reasoning. and reasoning. reasoning.
their Personal
Perspective, the
candidate:
1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15
AO3 The report lacks structure and is difficult to follow. The report is structured but at times difficult to follow. The report is generally well-structured and The report is well-structured and comprehensive. The report is very well-structured, cohesive and
Communication Arguments, evidence and perspectives are presented Relevant arguments, evidence and perspectives are comprehensive. Relevant arguments, evidence and perspectives are comprehensive.
- When writing but lack clarity. sometimes presented clearly. Relevant arguments, evidence and perspectives are presented clearly. Relevant arguments, evidence and perspectives are
the Report, the Little or no citation and/or referencing of sources. Citation and referencing of sources is attempted but generally presented clearly. Citation and referencing of sources are in a consistent presented clearly and effectively.
candidate: incomplete. Citation and referencing of sources are mostly in a format and mostly complete. Citation and referencing of sources are in a consistent
consistent format and mostly format and complete.
complete.
TOTAL
SCORE:

You might also like