Hamada Shadowing
Hamada Shadowing
In the past decades, shadowing has become quite popular in Japan and in other Asian
countries. Recently it has finally caught the attention of researchers and language teachers
in North America. The overarching purpose of this paper is to introduce shadowing for the
sake of effective teaching. First, the basic idea of what shadowing is is explained. Then,
shadowing in terms of listening practice will be discussed with its theoretical background,
examples, and teaching tips. Next, shadowing as speaking practice, mainly for pronunciation
development, will be discussed.
What is Shadowing?
The basic definition of shadowing is “a paced, auditory tracking task which involves the
immediate vocalization of auditorily presented stimuli” (Lambert, 1992, p. 266). The
metaphor of shadowing is the shadow that follows you on a street late in the afternoon,
copying your every move. Just like this, the shadowers (student) will shadow what they
hear as simultaneously and accurately as possible. This is illustrated in Figure 1.
Time: -------------------------------------------->
As Figure 1 shows, as soon as students hear the first word, they start re-
peating it simultaneously, and keep doing so until the end of the text.
Time: ---------------------------------------------------------->
listening skills will often be slow to improve. Such an exercise will generally help students’
top-down listening skills: use of background knowledge, helpful prediction, and effective
note taking. In other words, typical listening exercises improve students’ top-down listening
skills, but their bottom-up listening skills remain immature, so such students need useful
practice that develops their bottom-up listening skills specifically.
The primary role of shadowing for listening is to improve learners’ phoneme perception
skills. When shadowing, the students’ attention is mostly on catching the sounds, not
meanings, while when doing most common listening activities, their attention is typically
on meaning and understanding what they are listening to. Put simply, when shadowing,
students tend to process the audio stimulus by using bottom-up process more than top-
down process. Therefore, through the repeated practice of shadowing, they eventually
become better at catching the sounds (Hamada, 2016).
• First, because shadowing is demanding, both the teacher and the students should
understand the mechanism and purpose of shadowing to keep students concentrated
and motivated. Even in Japan, where students are accustomed to repetitive
practice and shadowing is widely known, students eventually become tired and lose
concentration as they practice. In cultures that are not used to repetitive practice
in school, this may be a potentially serious problem. Students need to know what
exactly they are practicing shadowing for.
• Second, shadowing should be used intensively for a short period of time only.
Research shows a noticeable change in two 10–15 minute sessions a week for a
month (Hamada, 2016). Even if students know why they are practicing shadowing, it
is difficult for them to maintain motivation for the repetitive and demanding nature
of shadowing. Once students acquire competent phoneme perception skills, they can
work on other types of practice based on the acquired skill.
• Third, research shows that five or six repetitions of the same passage is enough (Shiki,
Mori, Kadota, & Yoshida, 2010). Note that repetitions need not be consecutive, but
once learners shadow the same texts five or six times in total, they should move on
to a different text.
• Fourth, the source should match, as much as possible, the listening goal. For example,
if their goal is to keep up with the natural speed of authentic English, the students
should use the fastest source audio they can handle. Use of TV shows and radio news
might be helpful. Occasionally, I have seen teachers use shadowing as pair work,
in which one student shadows another. This style does not work as shadowing for
listening because the source phonology is often very different from the target
phonology.
• Lastly, students should understand the content of the target material before working
on shadowing (Hamada, 2014), but the teacher should remind them to focus on
the phonological features rather than meanings while shadowing. To focus on the
phonological features exclusively, not the contents, they should know the contents
beforehand. If they are asked to shadow an unknown story, it is too demanding and
difficult because multiple processes in their brains will lead to cognitive overload.
Further Tips
To make shadowing enjoyable, there are additional options that can add some spice. To
check progress accurately, the use of an IC-recorder or a smartphone voice memo app is
effective (Hamada, 2015). This way, students can check which words they were able to
shadow at their own pace. Also, changing the speed of the audio stimulus would be another
way to maintain their motivation. For example, by using Audacity (free audio recording
and editing software), we can change the speed from faster to slower, or vice versa. Having
them experience shadowing at 1.5x and then at the original speed, allows them to perceive
the original speed as slower.
Research has reported two ways of using shadowing for pronunciation and fluency
development. First, Foote and McDonough (2017) report that advanced ESL learners’
pronunciation features improved when they shadowed TV shows (Foote & McDonough,
2017). In their research, shadowing was mainly used as homework assignments, but it
can be used in a classroom as well. For example, each student chooses a short video such
as a TED talk as a model and practices shadowing it at home. They then bring it to the
classroom and perform in pairs or groups to receive feedback from their peers. They should
also record their performance at the same time and review it together with the feedback.
Any TV shows will work as long as the student is motivated to “speak” like the characters
in the TV shows.
To use shadowing to improve students’ pronunciation at the segmental levels and fluency,
there are two rules. First, students should find a model to copy and then practice shadowing
to simulate the model the best they can. Feedback from peers and teachers will be of great
help. Second, as repeatedly mentioned, the students need to have reached a high level of
English proficiency, especially in listening. Since they need to copy the model stimulus
exactly, checking and monitoring if they are actually copying it correctly by comparing
the target voice (input) and their voice (output), they need to have “good ears” (phoneme
perception skills).
IPA Shadowing
The second way of using shadowing for pronunciation and fluency development is IPA
shadowing (Hamada, 2015). In IPA shadowing, students are provided a transcript
written in International Phonetic Alphabet before shadowing the material. Prior to or
simultaneously, teachers need to teach how each IPA should be pronounced. This way, they
attend to both the script and the audio stimuli, eventually matching their knowledge of IPA
and its equivalent phonemic smoothly. In theory, IPA shadowing should raise students’
awareness of phonemic features, so segmental features of pronunciation will improve. Use
of IPA transcript helps teachers give precise feedback. Also, recording and reviewing their
shadowing performance with an IC-recorder will be effective in terms of teachers’ feedback
and students’ self-regulated learning.
Conclusion
In this paper, I explained the theoretical background of shadowing and its application in
classrooms both for listening and pronunciation development. Shadowing has only been
used for the past few decades in language teaching. I believe more students will benefit
from shadowing, and more useful shadowing variations will be produced in the future. I
hope this paper provides the foundation of the next steps of shadowing practice.