0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views26 pages

20210803-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Australia Prime Minister Said That If You Die From The Vaccine, It's Your Fault

PM Scott Morrison is blaming the “victim” when to my understanding not a single person could ever have given “informed consent” where there was a systematic denial of sufficient and appropriate information for any person to be a “participant” in a “clinical trial”. At the very least he (implied) acknowledges you can die from a vaccine that the Commonwealth Department of Health in my view failed to acknowledge!
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views26 pages

20210803-PRESS RELEASE MR G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. ISSUE - Australia Prime Minister Said That If You Die From The Vaccine, It's Your Fault

PM Scott Morrison is blaming the “victim” when to my understanding not a single person could ever have given “informed consent” where there was a systematic denial of sufficient and appropriate information for any person to be a “participant” in a “clinical trial”. At the very least he (implied) acknowledges you can die from a vaccine that the Commonwealth Department of Health in my view failed to acknowledge!
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

20210803-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

ISSUE –
Australia Prime Minister Said That If You Die From The Vaccine, It’s Your Fault

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, are you sure it was Prime Minister Scott Morrison and not dementia Joe?

**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, I did listen to the video recording and I understood that Scott
Morrison made clear that the Commonwealth is paying for citizens to consult their GP’s and so
they can make an informed decision and if they then accept to be vaccinated it is their own fault
if they die.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jchQxuzY/australia-prime-minister-said-th/
Australia Prime Minister Said That If You Die From The Vaccine, It’s Your Fault. (twitter.com)
* Do you agree with is mantra?
**#** Of course not. GP’s cannot be compelled to be conscripted but if they do want to charge
for any service against Medicare then they have to follow the directions of Medicare. As such, by
backdoor manner the Commonwealth obligated the GP’s to so to say sing of the same song book
as it does.
I have published my about 200 FOI Act request to Prime Minister Scott Morrison regarding
COVID related issues and well months later he still has not responded to a single one of them.
However, I understand he and other members of the parliament have been pursuing that the Big
Tech companies should not allow what they consider “disinformation” about COVID issues. As
such, if a person desires to be informed all the person can get is the mantra of the Government
spruiked by the Department of Health and the TGA and so the medical profession.

In my FOI Act request I pointed out that the Commonwealth Department of Health website
claims it provide relevant information, etc, but that in reality it is concealing very important
issues as to adverse reactions to the jabbing (referred to as vaccination). As such, the
Commonwealth Department of Health is part of the “deception” to deceive citizens as to be
jabbed.

Let us also not ignore that Prime Minister Scott Morrison made clear that the jabbing would be
compulsory. He, I understand, was the one who instigated “No Jab no Pay” which I view was
unconstitutional but really why would he care? Just that finally someone seems to have gotten
him to understand that Latham CJ already had ruled that compulsory vaccinations would violate
the constitution. So, now he is pursuing through backdoor manner the NEW WORLD ORDER
depopulation goal, with a vaccination certificate, etc, and that companies can deny services when
a person is not vaccinate, etc. Bret Hazzard the NSW Minister of health has on at least 2 different
occasions made clear that he is pursuing the NEW WORLD ORDER. That is in violation of s44
of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). No (Federal/ State/Territory)

p1 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Member of Parliament can promote/pursue to act for a foreign power that has hostility toward us
We, the People, and certainly seeks to overthrow out constitutional principles.
* Are you holding the view that the vaccination/jabbing is for ulterior purposes not at all to
combat some disease?
**#** Indeed I am. Let us look at some FACTS:

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-
2_Testing_1.html?fbclid=IwAR3lIN3P1HBTmmWaav0od-SKeIJ81c4G1VbmKqr090dknB5Hoo784OXj7sM
QUOTE
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing
sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin
their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages
laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate
detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays
can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can
save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and
testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility
before beginning clinical testing.
END QUOTE

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
QUOTE
An interference study evaluating the effect of common cold medications was not
performed. • Test performance can be affected because the epidemiology and clinical
spectrum of infection caused by 2019-nCoV is not fully known. For example,
clinicians and laboratories may not know the optimum types of specimens to collect,
and, during the course of infection, when these specimens are most likely to contain
levels of viral RNA that can be readily detected. • Detection of viral RNA may not
indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for
clinical symptoms. • The performance of this test has not been established for
monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection. • The performance of this test has not
been established for screening of blood or blood products for the presence of 2019-
nCoV. • This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral
pathogens.
END QUOTE

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/wow-watch-white-house-hack-completely-fall-
apart-newsmax-reporter-emerald-robinson-asks-cdc-testing-delta-
variant/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-
pundit&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=daily
Wow! Watch White House Hack Completely Fall Apart when Newsmax Reporter Emerald
Robinson Asks How CDC Is Testing for Delta Variant
QUOTE
She ends with, “Because the experts say so.” That is not an answer.
END QUOTE

p2 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
It appears to me that already on 20 January 2021 the W.H.O. (World Health Organization)
abandoned the use of the PCR test as being unreliable because it couldn’t properly establish a
person to be or not to be infected with COVID-19.

What is so absurd is that the CDC claiming that some UNNAMED EXPERTS claim how they
can establish the alleged “Delta Variant” then well the world needs to accept this, but how can
any laboratory establish the Delta variant if all they know is that the “experts say so” but not
providing any standards as to how to measure it.

Let see how a laboratory ordinary would be able to check what they are dealing with:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-30-cdc-fda-faked-covid-testing-protocol-by-using-
human-cells-mixed-with-common-cold-virus.html
BREAKING: CDC, FDA faked “covid” testing protocol by using human cells mixed with
common cold virus fragments… PCR tests are merely detecting the common cold
QUOTE
(Natural News) In a shocking revelation first reported by Dan Dicks of Press for
Truth (Canada), an FDA document admits that the CDC and FDA conspired to
fabricate a covid-19 testing protocol using human cells combined with common
cold virus fragments because they had no physical samples of the SARS-
CoV-2 “covid” virus available.
Without physical reference material to use for calibration and confirmation, the test
has zero scientific basis in physical reality. And all the PCR analysis based on this
protocol is utterly fraudulent, flagging people as “positive” for covid when they
merely possess tiny quantities of RNA fragments from other coronavirus strains
circulating in their blood.
END QUOTE
And
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-30-cdc-fda-faked-covid-testing-protocol-by-using-
human-cells-mixed-with-common-cold-virus.html
BREAKING: CDC, FDA faked “covid” testing protocol by using human cells mixed with
common cold virus fragments… PCR tests are merely detecting the common cold
QUOTE
While labs can purchase reference materials for microbes, heavy metals, pesticides,
etc. — all physical materials — I have searched far and wide and have not been
able to locate any certified reference materials for SARS-CoV-2 or even a
weakened, non-viable version of it. As far as I can tell, there appear to be no
physical specimens of isolated covid viruses available for instrument
calibrations and testing protocol quality control.
END QUOTE

What is makes very clear is that laboratories do not have any physical sample as to establish if
some swab contains SARS-CoV-2 but merely will go along that even if merely RNA from a
“COMMON COLD” is showing up then well just pretend it is “COVID-19” and well lockdown
the joint, as if there is a very dangerous killer virus going on. OK, perhaps INFLUENZA might
also turn out to be involved but both to my understanding are NOT “coronaviruses”. Still, again,
lock down the joint and destroy the livelihood of many small businesses, deny proper medical
care, etc, by pretending it is COVID!

p3 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
https://www.pathology.health.nsw.gov.au/covid-19-info/sars-cov2-nat
QUOTE
It is performed using either in-house real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing which is used across
the world to diagnose COVID 19 infection.
The assays used are extremely accurate with a high sensitivity to detect the virus and a high specificity for
the virus. The different assays and platforms used across NSWHP have specific indicators of sensitivity and
specificity and these are validated by NSW Health Pathology as required by the Australian Standards of
NPAAC (National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council).
PCR testing is regarded as the current standard for diagnosis of COVID-19 infection (see the Australian
Government Department of Health’s Therapeutic Goods Administration website) and Public Health
Laboratory Network (PHLN) data.
Generally, the number of cycles run by the PCR systems is 45, however this can vary depending on the
machine or assay used. Generally the cut-off or threshold is set at a Ct of 40. However as mentioned
above this is set by the manufacturer’s instructions as well as the validation processes required by all
Australian laboratories.
END QUOTE

It appears to me that therefore the Australian laboratories were incorrectly assessing PCR testing!
Somehow no medical doctor/scientist was competent enough to pursue the correct cycles were to
be used?
https://cormandrostenreview.com/cease-and-desist-order-fuellmich-drosten/
RMAN-DROSTEN REVIEW REPORT
CURATED BY AN INTERNATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF SCIENTISTS IN LIFE SCIENCES (ICSLS)
QUOTE

 If the test system only begins detection after a large number of replication cycles, the viral load is so low
that active infection is ruled out. In the NDR podcast of May 7, 2020, you yourself referred to a study
according to which a patient is considered “less infectious” above 25 cycles. In fact, the authors of a
Canadian study failed to identify any replicable virus beyond 24 cycles (Jared Bullard et al. in Clinical
Infectious Diseases, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ ciaa638). Nevertheless, when the new case numbers are
added up again, nowhere is it checked at which Ct value the cut-off was set in the respective positive test
case. This makes the result of a PCR test highly susceptible to manipulation – and thus susceptible to political
influence when high case numbers are “needed” in order to intimidate the population. In any case, the values
determined on the basis of a PCR test are not a sufficient basis for a complete shutdown of public life and
interference with people’s liberties on an unprecedented scale.

 A PCR test is not capable of distinguishing mere contamination from infection. As long as the viruses
remain on the mucous membranes and do not enter the cells of the body, a person is only contaminated, but
not infected. In this case, the viruses do not replicate and therefore do not pose a risk of infection.
Nevertheless, a PCR test will deliver a positive result for such people. You yourself pointed out this problem
in an interview with Wirtschaftswoche in 2014.

 The significance of a positive PCR test also depends on which and how many primers are searched for.
The less specific these are for SARS-CoV-2, the lower this significance.

Conclusion: a positive PCR test is not the same as an infection. We don’t know what happened in all the
particular testing-labs. It is not surprising that Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientific Officer for Respiratory
Research at Pfizer, strongly advises against the use of PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a recent article
(https://lockdownstics.org/lies- damned-lies- and-health-statistics- the-deadly-danger-of-false-positives/).
END QUOTE

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pcr-testing-incorrect-use/
PCR Testing Saga: Were We Duped? • Children's Health Defense
0 2 /23/21
BIG PHARMA › VIEWS
PCR Testing Saga: Were We Duped?

p4 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Were federal health officials and experts at WHO really unaware that the recommended high cycle
count (CT) for PCR tests would produce an exorbitant number of false positives for COVID?
By
Dr. Joseph Mercola
QUOTE
Story at-a-glance:
 Curative offers a PCR test using spit rather than swabs from the back of your nasal cavity. Initially only

authorized for use on symptomatic patients, the company has requested the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration expand its authorization for use on asymptomatic individuals.

 According to company data, the spit test accurately identifies about 90% of positive cases when compared
against a nasopharyngeal PCR test set to 35 cycle threshold (CT).

 According to the FDA, that comparative CT is too low, and will produce too many false negatives. This,
despite the scientific consensus, which states anything over 35 CTs is scientifically unjustifiable as it

produces enormous amounts of false positives.

 According to an April 2020 study, a CT of 17 must be used to obtain 100% confirmed real positives. Above

17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. At 33 cycles, the false positive rate is 80%. Beyond 34 cycles, the
false positive rate reaches 100%.

 Because the PCR test cannot discern between live virus and dead, noninfectious viral debris, the timing of
the test is important. Recent research shows the median time from symptom onset to viral clearance

confirmed by viral culture is seven days, whereas the PCR test continues to detect nonviable
(noninfectious) SARS-CoV-2 for a median of 34 days.

For several months, experts have highlighted the true cause behind the COVID-19 pandemic, namely

the incorrect use of PCR tests set at a ridiculously high cycle count (CT), which falsely labels healthy people

as “COVID-19 cases.” In reality, the PCR test is not a proper diagnostic test, although it has been promoted

as such.

An important question that demands an answer is whether the experts at our federal health agencies and the

World Health Organization were really too ignorant to understand the implications of using this test at

excessive CT, or whether it was done on purpose to create the illusion of a dangerous, out-of-control

pandemic.

Regardless, those in charge need to be held accountable, which is precisely what the German Corona Extra-
Parliamentary Inquiry Committee
END QUOTE
Again:
QUOTE
 According to an April 2020 study, a CT of 17 must be used to obtain 100% confirmed
real positives. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. At 33 cycles, the false
positive rate is 80%. Beyond 34 cycles, the false positive rate reaches 100%.
p5 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
END QUOTE

So, we have that instead of 17Ct (17 cycles) the TGA and others are using 45 Ct (45 cycles)
,when already at 35Ct (35 cycles) the result is increased then already about 4,000 fold.
From this, it ought to be clear that to run 45 Ct (45 cycles) this gives a 100% false positives.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-25-cdc-withdraws-fraudulent-pcr-testing-protocol-
used-to-falsify-covid-positives.html
CDC withdraws fraudulent PCR testing protocol that was used to falsify covid “positives” to push
the plandemic

As such, one can therefore hold:

‘INFLUENZA’ has been used for an elaborate ‘COVID-19’ scam to justify


‘LOCKDOWNS’, including ‘DELTA’ but like hay fever you cannot infect others with
‘INFLUENZA’ as research done way back in 1919 then already proved.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-30-evidence-suggests-covid-vaccine-may-spread-
coronavirus.html
New evidence suggests COVID vaccine may *SPREAD* the virus: NBC News report
deleted from USA Today article
QUOTE
(Natural News) “NBC News, citing unnamed officials aware of the decision, reported it
comes after new data suggests vaccinated individuals could have higher levels of virus and
infect others amid the surge of cases driven by the delta variant of the coronavirus,” the
USA Today reported in a passage that was later scrubbed from an article.
(Article republished from BeckerNews.com) https://beckernews.com/new-evidence-
suggests-covid-vaccine-may-spread-the-virus-nbc-news-report-deleted-from-usa-today-
article-40546/
A screenshot from the article and an
online archive https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/usa-today-nbc-news-new-data-
suggests-vaccinated-individuals-could-have-higher-levels-of-virus-and-infect-others/ of
the passage points out the surfacing evidence.
The story from the USA Today drops the reference to NBC News, but nonetheless
corroborates the news: “CDC says vaccinated people may transmit virus, recommends
masks indoors.”
“CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said new data shows the delta variant, which
accounts for more than 80% of the new infections in the U.S., behaves ‘uniquely
differently’ from its predecessors and could make vaccinated people infectious,” the article
notes.
“Information on the delta variant from several states and other countries indicates that in
rare occasions some vaccinated people infected with the delta variant after vaccination may
be contagious and spread the virus to others,” Walensky said in announcing new guidance,
which reverses a CDC recommendation in May. “This new science is worrisome and
unfortunately warrants an update to our recommendation.”
END QUOTE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-29-cdc-confesses-covid-vaccines-medical-hoax-higher-
viral-loads.html
CDC confesses to COVID-19 “vaccines” being a medical HOAX… vaxxed individuals
shown to have HIGHER viral loads and can be super-spreaders
p6 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
QUOTE
Walensky further admitted during the call that vaccinated people carry the
same potential viral load as unvaccinated people.
END QUOTE

Moment, what happened with Greg Hunt Federal Minister for Health claiming to get vaccinated
to do it for your “Dad, mother, grandparents and others”? Was he meaning so you can kill them
off by spreading whatever? I do not think that he was meaning this, but then why make a claim
when it contradicts the real facts?

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-29-cdc-confesses-vaccines-are-failing-the-vaxxed-can-
be-super-spreaders.html
CDC confesses: Vaccines are failing, the vaxxed can be super-spreaders, demands return to
mask mandates for everyone, including the vaxxed
QUOTE
(Natural News) Via the words of the CDC’s own director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the
official narrative on vaccines and covid has just self-destructed. While in March of this
year, Walenksy had publicly promised that vaccinated people could not spread the virus
and infect others, this week she publicly stated that vaccines are failing, and that
vaccinated people may now carry higher viral loads than unvaccinated people,
contributing to the spread of covid.
Even Yahoo News, which typically shills for Big Pharma, could not sugarcoat the
devastating narrative shift, reporting:
The CDC updated its guidelines on Tuesday to recommend masks indoors, even for
vaccinated people.
The Delta variant makes it easier for vaccinated people to transmit the virus, the CDC
said.
Vaccinated and unvaccinated people infected with Delta may have similar viral loads.
END QUOTE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-29-cdc-confesses-vaccines-are-failing-the-vaxxed-can-
be-super-spreaders.html
CDC confesses: Vaccines are failing, the vaxxed can be super-spreaders, demands return to
mask mandates for everyone, including the vaxxed
QUOTE
CDC “confession” just obliterated all the promises made to the vaccinated… now they are
slowly realizing they’re the doomed super-spreaders
In making these public statements, the CDC just admitted that the entire promise that
vaccinated people were immune to covid and couldn’t spread it to others just
unraveled. Immediately, the CDC demanded that the entire nation revert to neanderthal
mask mandates, even for those who have been “fully vaccinated.”
It begs the question: If the answer isn’t vaccines but rather just wearing masks, then why
does America need the CDC in the first place? And since masks actually don’t work to
block viral particles that are orders of magnitude smaller than the gaps in the mask threads,
then how can masks stop them?
And if vaccines aren’t working, then what’s the use of vaccine passports?
END QUOTE

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/07/27/covid-vaccine-variant-hospitalization-
children-mask-mandates/5380480001/
CDC says vaccinated people may transmit virus, recommends masks indoors; L.A.
mandates vaccination or weekly tests: Latest COVID-19 updates
p7 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
QUOTE
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended Tuesday that fully
vaccinated people wear masks indoors in areas with high transmission as COVID-19 cases
continue to rise and vaccination rates wane.
CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said new data shows the delta variant, which
accounts for more than 80% of the new infections in the U.S., behaves "uniquely
differently'' from its predecessors and could make vaccinated people infectious.
"Information on the delta variant from several states and other countries indicates that in
rare occasions some vaccinated people infected with the delta variant after vaccination may
be contagious and spread the virus to others,'' Walensky said in announcing the new
guidance, a reversal of what the CDC recommended in May. "This new science is
worrisome and unfortunately warrants an update to our recommendation.''
Parts of the U.S. with at least 50 new cases per 100,000 people in the last week, which
includes 60 percent of the nation's counties, are subject to the guidance. New case rates are
particularly high in the South and Southwest.
Walensky emphasized the importance of getting vaccinated, saying so-called breakthrough
infections of inoculated people are rare and typically don't lead to serious illness.
She also said the new guidance will apply to schools in the upcoming fall term, noting that
students should return to in-person learning full-time.
"CDC recommends that everyone in K-12 schools wear a mask indoors, including
teachers, staff, students and visitors, regardless of vaccination status,'' Walensky said.
END QUOTE

https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/usa-today-nbc-news-new-data-suggests-vaccinated-
individuals-could-have-higher-levels-of-virus-and-infect-others/
SA Today / NBC News: “New data suggests vaccinated individuals could have higher levels
of virus and infect others”
QUOTE
“NBC News, citing unnamed officials aware of the decision, reported it comes after new
data suggests vaccinated individuals could have higher levels of virus and infect others
amid the surge of cases driven by the delta variant of the coronavirus.”
www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/07/27/covid-vaccine-variant-hospitalization-
children-mask-mandates/5380480001/
Note: It looks like they’ve updated the article to remove this, but the link above will
work in the archive-today site.
END QUOTE

If anything what the above set out indicates is that politicians, scientist, medical doctors, etc, all
involved in this elaborate scam of COVID HOAX have tainted their credibility considerably.

Remember the “VACCINES ARE SAFE” cliché when in could (2018) it was discovered that the
CDC actually in violation of legal requirements never actually kept a proper record of the harm
vaccines caused. And, then it withdrew “vaccines are safe” cliché from its website. And
subsequently it also removed the cliché “VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM” when a
former scientist produced the records that actually it had been for decades known that vaccines
do cause autism but the pharmaceutical companies were concealing this. So, for profits they
couldn’t give a darn about all those children who had adverse reaction to be harmed for life with
autism, etc.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/shocking-speech-2010-document-exposes-rockefeller-foundation-
globalist-scheme-video/
Shocking Speech by Thierry Baudet about 2010 Document ...
p8 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
6 June 2021 ... Rair Foundation first broke the story by posting a video of a speech by
the Dutch MP, Thierry Baudet, who refers to a 2010 Rockefeller ...
https://banned.video/watch?id=60bd9f82a16a826dcebf7905
Dutch Leader Exposes Rockefeller Foundation And Globalist Scheme-banned-video

Chairperson, in 2010, the Rockerfeller Foundation, one of the most influential NGOs in the
world, developed a number of scenarios for the future of technology and international
development. This report.
And in this report, the Rockefeller Foundation described the so called “Lock Step
Scenario” on the coming of a world-wide pandemic and its aftermath. Already in 2010.
According to this scenario - and I have it here with me - the Chinese would be the first
begin with “required quarantine for all citizens” - that’s a quote - and immediate and
almost hermetic closing off of all borders. National leaders all over the world would
strengthen their power with laws, rules, and restrictions, from the requirement to wear
masks to body temperature checks on entering train stations, planes, buildings. It all comes
in here. But it doesn’t even stop there.
According to Scenario Lock Step, we have a lot more to look forward to:

“Even after the pandemic was over, “the researches write, “the authorian control would
remain, with supervision of the citizens and their activities, and would even be intensified.”
In this report from 2010, even climate lockdowns are hinted at. Precisely what they are
already beginning to talk about in our time. I quote: “To protect oneself against
increasingly global problems - from pandemics and transnational terrorism to
environmental crises and increasing poverty, leaders all over the world will increase their
grip on power.” And the report also predicts well how citizens would react to all the
regulations. Sorry, I say. Just as now, people shout with joy when they are vaccinated,
photos of their injected arm on social media - it is all in this report - and they beg for a
Corona passport, the Lock Step Scenario writers predict, just as I said. The more controlled
world thus finds, so they predicted in 2010, much acceptance among the people. Citizens
voluntarily gave up part of their sovereignty - and their privacy - in exchange for more
safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant and even eager to get more top-down
steering and supervision. National leaders had more freedom to enforce order in ways they
themselves saw fit. That this would lead to a digital passport, the authors of the
Rockerfeller Foundation report had also foreseen. In 2010, the Rockerfeller Foundation
was not able to literally predict the current technological state of things, but the thought
then that sharpened supervision would lead to a biometric ID for all citizens. And it is now
in our paper passports. The digital vaccination passport is just a supplement. Just 13 years
after the pandemic, the public would, according to the Rockerfeller Foundation,
realize they have been cheated, had enough of the controls and the absurd power
fantasies of the masters. And Chairperson, I still hope that the Rockerfeller Foundation is
wrong on that point. All of their forecasts have come true, but I hope that here they are
really wrong, that a point comes that we wake up, that we realize that this is a collective
psychosis. that the locking up of our country, of half of the world, lasting a year and a half
because of a flu variant, is madness. That we run around with the BS - non-functional
masks, that we abide by the complete nonsensical distance regulations. And see our
businesses, our social life go to pieces. that we with great, first-line medicines like
Ivermectin, tegenhouden, only accelerate experimental injections to the status of
“authorized vaccine” that can be given. That we chatter over, “Oh, the infection will come
back.” while this past year naturally, it also happened, just as it happens every year, just as
p9 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
naturally, that with autumn, come the new infection, just like always happens. and we
pretend that it is because of Corona while what we earlier called the flu, would seem to
have completely disappeared. But it is most important, and these will be my closing words,
that we realize that with a pretext, one or another hysteria over this Chinese flu, and
infrastructure has been put together that in any arbitrary moment, because of any arbitrary
event, the authority can be applied again. Lockdowns, masks, keeping distance, no more
travel, no more hand shaking, allowing absurd experimental injections. This corona period
was an obedience training. The Tweede Kamer and the Rutte government have carried out
this training brilliantly. Congratulations. Klaus Schwab can be proud of you. The globalist
plan can find the passageway, and the next step toward mass surveillance and total control
can be set.
Chairperson: - Thank you.
(The “Tweede Kamer” is referred to in Australia as the “House of Representatives”)
I do not accept that medical doctors all over the world all happen to be so stupid not to bother to
carefully check what vaccines are about. Indeed, as shown many doctors and nurses themselves
refuse to be jabbed.

https://aapsonline.org/majority-of-physicians-decline-covid-shots-according-to-survey/

Majority of Physicians Decline COVID


Shots, according to Survey
What we neither can and ought not should ignore is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MXCueMvukw
CBS News 1976 60 Minutes Swine Flu Special with Mike Wallace

This is about the concealment of the Swine Flu vaccination adverse reaction issues (as I view the
Commonwealth Department of Health is engaging in) where afterwards it was discovered there
was no Swine Flu, merely someone had claimed it and millions of American went for the jab,
many then becoming serious ill and died for a hoax Swine Flu claim.

What I am concerned about also is that here we had a pharmacist injecting people with some
COVID vaccination,. He explained he had every day at least a hundred turning up to be jabbed.
Now, how on earth could he have given appropriate information to each and every person as to
the adverse issues regarding vaccinations? They might sing a document that they gave consent
but it never could be “informed consent”. Firstly, if you do not know what kind of vaccine you
are going to be injected with then how on earth would you know what to look for? Also, I wrote
in the past that I had a text message on my mobile that i was entitled to be vaccinated and had 48
hours to confirm to accept the vaccination. Not a shred of details was provided what kind of
vaccination was referred to and neither for any GP appointment to be made first, just to agree to
attend for the jab.
Unless one provides all relevant details, both in favour and adverse to a person before requesting
the person to be jabbed you cannot legitimately claim there was “informed consent”. And, one
also has to stick to the time frame that if you tell a person that this will require a second dose say
after 14 days, but then it is changed to weeks or even months, then that also invalidated any
purported “informed consent”.
p10 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
The same with if you were advised to have a second dose of the same vaccine brand and then the
Government changes it to a different brand, then again the purported “informed consent” I view
is out of the door. It no longer existed once there was any breach of what was originally stated.

There is also a concern that a pharmacy hardly is the kind of place where you can consult a
patient. Ordinary a medical doctor only can deal with a “patient” and under his supervision a
nurse may then jab a person. However, a pharmacist is not a medical doctor and I view it is the
same or similar that a VET (veterinarian) cannot deal with human patients.
I once was in a court case where the opposing Counsel had filed an affidavit stating that his client
was wheelchair bound due to certain illnesses. I objected to the affidavit and it was then
withdrawn, as it was from a veterinarian (animal doctor) and not permitted in law from him
about human diseases, etc. Counsel argued that the clients own doctor refused to make an
affidavit and so he instead had the veterinarian doing so. Just that the trial judge didn’t accept
this to be legally valid.
* What is your view then about this COVID issue?
**#** It has given me a better perception how the NAZI’s did it in 1933 and onwards to get
ordinary people not just attacking but even killing their neighbours as to the implanted FEAR
against their neighbours.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/explosion-in-mandatory-masking-isnt-driven-by-science-but-fear
Explosion in mandatory masking isn’t driven by science, but fear
You will be shocked by many of the revelations in this report that your usual information
sources are not telling you.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/explosion-in-mandatory-masking-isnt-driven-by-science-but-fear-part-
ii?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=catholic?x=1
Explosion in mandatory masking isn’t driven by science, but fear - Part II
After reading this, you will have a far better understanding about masks, mandatory mask
regulations, safety concerns about sending children back to school and the Wuhan virus in
general than very few, if any, of your friends or neighbors will possess.

*. What about the TGA having approved vaccinations for children of certain ages?
**#** I will set out below some details that tin my view the TGA and its advisors are not just
negligent but I view involved in criminal conduct to ignore any proper consideration tor any
person, let alone children.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=816rqF1GQ74
TGA has approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 9 News Australia
“IF PEOPLE GET JABBED AFTER WATCHING THIS THEY ARE BEYOND
SAVING” VIDEO
QUOTE
NO PK DRUG INTERACTION STUDIES HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED WITH COVID-19 mRNA
VACCINE BN16262.

NO SINGLE DOSE TOXICITY STUDIES HAVE BEEN MPERFORMED

NO TOXICOKINETIC STUDIES HAVE BEEN PERFORMED WITH THE VACCINE.

NO GENOTOXICITY STUDIES ARE PLANNED FOR BNTI6262

p11 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES WITH BN16262 HAVE NOT BEEN CONDUCTED

[S]AFE USE OF THE VACCINE IN PREGNANT WOMAN CANNOT BE PROMOTED AT THE


PRESENT TIME.

STUDIES IN WHICH THE OFFSPRING (JUVENILE ANIMALS) ARE DOSED AND/OR FURTHER
EVALUATED. NO SUCH STUDIES HAVE BEEN DONE.
END QUOTE

As I understand it, the so called vaccines were not measured as to the immune response,
infection response as well as neither for transmission response!
And, with so much data having remained concealed I view that the TGA to approve any “clinical
trial” and allow in essence most people to be jabbed is not just grossly irresponsible but criminal.
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/04/16/johns-hopkins-you-can-be-vaccinated-with-a-pcr-test-without-
knowing
The PCR test can vaxx You
SCAMDEMIC - CORONA VIRUS
Johns Hopkins: You Can Be Vaccinated With A PCR Test Without Knowing
QUOTE
The Vaccination That Is Not A Vaccination, But Gene Therapy
In a revealing video conference [9] with Dr. Judy Mikovits, Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr.
David Martin, it is explained that the mRNA vaccine, by the legal definition, is not a
vaccine at all. It is falsely called a vaccine to hide the fact that the purported vaccine
is, in fact, a gene therapy. Experienced physician and epidemiologist, Dr. Wolfgang
Wodarg, stated in a censored interview with Rubikon, “Actually, this ‘promising’ vaccine
should be PROHIBITED for the vast majority of people because it is genetic
engineering!”
END QUOTE

Pfizer in its patent as I understand it concealed as a trade secret that it was using graphene. So
how on earth could the TGA and its advisors do a proper consideration when as I understand it
graphene can be deadly and can have serious issues associated with it.?

http://www.bitchute.com/video/YCAV4xcMiR3e/
Graphene Reacting To EM Field From A Cell Phone

http://www.bitchute.com/video/FwFuty1rdBtB/
Magnetic Meat?

http://www.bitchute.com/video/eJJRORNuVAgr/
WALMART'S MAGNETIC MEAT [2021-06-21] - CHILDOFGOD1776 (VIDEO)

http://www.bitchute.com/video/a3TfNnJ2rrRZ/
MAGNETIC MEAT CHALLENGE! (PARODY)

http://www.bitchute.com/video/jYxd8DXdRpqr/
Magnetic meat and magnetized unvaxxed ppl could mean our meat is being vaccinated!

VACCINATE- The Propaganda Anthem-banned-video


(notice it involves also a Sherriff (USA) by forcefully injecting a woman notably on the street
against her will. Where is the “INFORMED CONSENT”?)

p12 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Here we had a woman held at least by 4 people including a Sherrif (USA) and where is the
observation room for her after the jabbing? The same with the Pharmacist in the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvOKT-qQXU4
Major crackdown on COVID-19 compliance, leaders discuss vaccine target 9 News Australia

It didn’t seem to me that this pharmacy in the news bulletin was equipped with appropriate
restroom/recovery room facilities. It seems to me that a person walks of the street and then sign a
purported “informed consent” form and then is jabbed. As the Pharmacist himself made clear he
had far more people turning up than he expected. As such unlikely was any of them given
appropriate information. After all Prime minister Scott Morrison made known that the
Commonwealth was paying for the GP’s to inform patients. I am not aware this applies to
pharmacist, and whomever might be jabbing people. IAs a matter of fact why would the military
be involved and according to WA legislation permitted to use ‘FORCE” to enter a property and
to jab a person with “POISON”, which I view underlines that “informed consent” doesn’t apply
whatsoever in such a situation.

https://banned.video/watch?id=60f60694c3f23d6e17721caa
mRNA Vaccine Inventor Rails Against the Establishment's "Noble Lie"
Bill Gates Founded Company Admits It Wants To Program Your DNA-banned-video
Those working for Bill Gates openly admits in this video that they can then use the
technology to active the messenger to destroy cells, etc. As was referred to it is like a
COMPUTERS

https://banned.video/watch?id=60edc7a15e1bc05c8a3e8118
https://banned.video/watch?id=60f60694c3f23d6e17721caa
Predictive Programming Injection with Spike (Branched) DNA Proteins Used for
Tracking Grid In X-Files Season 2

https://banned.video/watch?id=60b41bdaddb0ce5c01560b03
Full Interview: World Renowned Doctor Blows Lid Off Of COVID

p13 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Even so the TGA claims to be in contact with others such as the British and the FDA, etc,
nevertheless one may note that (at least when I checked the Department of Health website – as
referred to in past writings) nothing of this was published on the Department of Health website
and to my knowledge neither is provided as information to a person to make an “INFORMED
DECISION” as to be jabbed or not.
Do you really accept that the Pharmacist explained to each and every oof the more than 100
people who attended to be jabbed all those adverse reactions, including death for each person to
have been able to sing validly a document of “informed consent”. Perhaps the pharmacist might
have video recorded each and every person having been given all relevant details before having
signed the “informed consent” document and being jabbed.

https://erbn.online/1559
QUOTE
Because these novel vaccines have not been sufficiently tested, and clearly are dangerous, the UK
government’s Department of Health awarded a special contract to Genpact (UK) Ltd in September.
The procurement, of which that contract is the result, stated: “The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial
Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug
Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.”
END QUOTE

p14 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
See also:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf/VAERS-v2-SOP.pdf

Again the (commonwealth) Department of Health claimed:


QUOTE
Any vaccine can cause some mild side effects. The main side effects from vaccines are some soreness,
redness or swelling where you had the injection, a headache or mild fever and fatigue. Most of these can be
managed with some mild pain relief and are no cause for alarm.
END QUOTE

It just omitted to list the dangers the FDA referred to! No one in his right mind would accept that
those dangers only relate to the USA and somehow Australians do not face similar risk.
And:
https://www.health.gov.au/covid19-vaccines-is-it-true
COVID-19 vaccines ⁠–⁠ Is it true
QUOTE
COVID-19 vaccines ⁠–⁠ Is it true?
With new COVID-19 vaccine developments every day, it’s normal to have questions or
concerns, and possibly feel hesitant about getting a vaccine. That's why we're providing
accurate, evidence-based answers to questions about COVID-19 vaccines. Find out
more.

The importance of credible information

Australians are encouraged to rely on reputable sources of information to help them


make informed choices and stay up-to-date on the latest information about COVID-
19 vaccines.

END QUOTE

As such, in my view the Department of Health is following “government policy” meaning


“political science” instead of “medical science” and betraying Australians by concealing the true
dangers, etc by concealing the real dangers!

In my view by concealing relevant details then this must be deemed


“disinformation/misinformation” and where this is done to elicit purported “consent” then no
valid “INFORMED CONSENT” could ever be claimed to have been obtained.

https://youtu.be/816rgF1GQ74
“TGA has approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 12 to 15 | 9
News Australia"

https://banned.video/watch?id=60ccfe51c9de0e16ffb52834
Pro Vax Doctor Reveals That COVID Vaccines Can Insert Nano Particles Into The
Brain

https://banned.video/watch?id=609b6ff92cb3de234448ea8f
Moderna Chief Medical Officer Confirms mRNA Injection For COVID-19 Can
Change Your Genetic Code

https://banned.video/watch?id=60f9a94a4641590721b21ba9
p15 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
“Senator Ron Johnson” -banned-video Regarding the suffering of people from so called
vaccinations -Craig-Kelly-MP-768x360=Israelis deaths

https://banned.video/watch?id=6084834cb7625f0944bd46a0
DISTURBING! Pfizer Vaccine Zoomed w Microscope! Are Living Cells Organisms Mixed In!

https://banned.video/watch?id=60cbca2a31a12f140b20fc62
Canadian MP and Top Virologist Spit Fire on Pandemic Coverup and Death
https://banned.video/watch?id=60ef18327c697f60aade721e
OAN Report: MSM Hiding Deaths And Damage From COVID-19 Vaccines
https://banned.video/watch?id=60edfb2846d8b15d7198ae74
“Senator Slips, Says Vaccines Have Killed Millions World Wide” -banned-video
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
CORMAN-DROSTEN REVIEW REPORT CURATED BY AN INTERNATIONAL CONSORTIUM OF
SCIENTISTS IN LIFE SCIENCES (ICSLS) [NOV 2020 - JAN 2021]
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS -CoV-2 reveals 10 majo r
scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: conseq uences for
false positive results.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-pcr-test-no-pandemic-only-junk-
data/5746038?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
COVID-19 and the PCR Test — No Pandemic, Only Junk Data! - Global ResearchGlobal
Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
COVID-19 and the PCR Test — No Pandemic, Only Junk Data!
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=71660
PCR Test Inventor Kary Mullis Exposes Raw Truth About the Flawed COVID-19
Test—Is this why he was assassinated just before the CORONAhoax was staged?!
https://banned.video/watch?id=60cba127a93e3d1257c87c0c
Pharmacist Whistleblower Quits CVS Job Says COVID-19 Shots Are Harming People
https://banned.video/watch?id=60dcd432f584193766f59629
South African Doctor Reveals How He Treated 4000 COVID Patients With Zero Deaths

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code
p16 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
QUOTE
The ten points of the Nuremberg Code[edit]

The ten points of the code were given in the section of the verdict entitled "Permissible Medical
Experiments":[5]

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society,
unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and
unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal


experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other
problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the
experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and


mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that


death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where
the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the
humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the
experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The


highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the
experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

p17 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring
the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where
continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to
terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the
exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a
continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the
experimental subject.

END QUOTE

It therefore must be clear that PM Scott Morrison pursuing that there is a compulsory vaccination
which is actually an “EXPERIMENT” as the “Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injections”
are, albeit he flip flop about it, and so Commie Dan, it is important to understand that I wrote
extensively about the so called vaccines to be “EXPERIMENTAL” as it was never before done
on humans to alter their genes in such manner, and therefore it is not just good enough to tell
them you need to do it or you may not be allowed to use public transport, use an airliner, etc,
because what is needed is a medical doctor (Bio-Security Act 2015) to assess each citizen
separately and do test on this citizen to make sure that any such experimental vaccination is not
going to have some unexpected adverse reaction.
Indeed to allow pharmacist to now inject a citizen when if there is an adverse reaction then the
citizen very well if not death right there and then could be ending up with lifelong disabilities,
then this too underlines that there is a reckless conduct all around.
To allow any kind of “Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injections ” (including that of
Moderna) to be used by staff of any pharmacy I view is lunacy in itself.

* In my view any “medical treatment” as I view Pfizer is must not and cannot be done by a
person not qualified to provide “medical treatment”. Is that correct?
**#** I agree and also if things are going the wrong way as it is an EXPERIEMENT then
insurance companies may refuse to honour any policy. It is absurd to get jabbed and in the end
have more health problems then if you were never jabbed. I view that there should be a
moratorium of all so called vaccinations whatsoever and only if a doctor puts his name to
recommend a particular vaccination for a patient should there be a vaccination. This nonsense
about doing it for your “Dad, mum, grandparents and others” is an absurd statement as if the
person goes ahead and ends up if not invalid but even death then what benefit did this “Dad,
mum, grandparents and others get from this other then a lot of sorrow?
*.Do you view this is more about power and perhaps financial kickbacks?
**#** As they often say FOLLOW THE MONEY. And in my view more than likely the deal
Prime Minister Scott Morrison and others entered into with Pfizer is in violation of our
constitutional rights as well as certain legislation and the secrecy might not because of trade
secrets, as it is a well legal established principle that when using taxpayers monies then the
contract must be made public. No such thing as secret hush money or other direct/indirect
financial benefits. Or perhaps the revolving door system where Ministers then resign and get to
work for some pharmaceutical company as a reward for assisting with the mass killings on behalf
of the pharmaceutical companies.
p18 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1419653002818990085.html
PFIZERLEAK: EXPOSING THE PFIZER MANUFACTURING AND SUPPLY
AGREEMENT

While this was an alleged Albanian agreement, if indeed similar provisions were in the
Australian agreement then it appears to me in violation of our constitution as well as violating
legislative provisions. Involving likely criminal conduct/conspiracy!

*.And you pursue a ROYAL COMMISSION as well as a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION by the


Australian Federal Police?
**#** I take this matter very serious and in my view Prime minister Scott Morrison and his
fellow Ministers and public servants violated constitutional principles and if he did spend about
$1 billion or so then surely there has to be transparency how much of the monies were involved
and what, if any direct/indirect financial benefits were given to them. In the USA the
pharmaceutical companies have been providing funding to about 2,400 politicians and more than
likely the same might be eventuating in Australia. By this, the money may be the real issue and
then they couldn’t care less how many people were to die as that is not their concern.

*. What do you understand “INFORMED CONSENT” is about?


**#** In my view it is better for the reader to check out the links below and there are lots more
of them on the internet.

https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/informed-consent
Informed consent | healthdirect
Informed consent in healthcare means you will be given understandable and clear information
about your choices so you can make the right decisions about ...

https://www.cancer.org/treatment/finding-and-paying-for-treatment/understanding-
financial-and-legal-matters/informed-consent/what-is-informed-consent.html
What Is Informed Consent? - American Cancer Society
13 May 2019 ... Signing informed consent means. You have received all the information about
your treatment options from your health care provider.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430827/
Informed Consent - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
However, a discussion regarding the risks and benefits of using a sphygmomanometer usually
is not required. Clinical Significance in ...

https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/partnering-consumers/informed-consent
Informed consent | Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in ...
Informed consent is a person's decision, given voluntarily, to agree to a healthcare treatment,
procedure or other intervention that is made:

https://www.healthline.com/health/informed-consent
Informed Consent in Healthcare: What It Is and Why It's Needed
11 Oct 2019 ... Informed consent means that you made a voluntary and educated decision. It
also means that your healthcare provider has fully explained the ...
p19 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informed_consent
Informed consent - Wikipedia
Informed consent is a process for getting permission before conducting a healthcare
intervention on a person, for conducting some form of research on a ...

https://www.medicinenet.com/informed_consent/definition.htm
Medical Definition of Informed consent - MedicineNet
29 Mar 2021 ... Medical Definition of Informed consent ... Informed consent: The process by
which a patient learns about and understands the purpose, benefits, ...
QUOTE
Medical Definition of Informed consent

 Medical Editor: Charles Patrick Davis, MD, PhD

Reviewed on 3/29/2021
Privacy & Trust Info
Informed consent: The process by which a patient learns about and understands the
purpose, benefits, and potential risks of a medical or surgical intervention, including
clinical trials, and then agrees to receive the treatment or participate in the trial. Informed
consent generally requires the patient or responsible party to sign a statement confirming
that they understand the risks and benefits of the procedure or treatment.
END QUOTE

https://www.emedicinehealth.com/informed_consent/article_em.htm
What is Informed Consent in Healthcare? 4 Principles, Important ...
Informed consent is defined as the permission a patient gives a doctor to perform a test or
procedure after the doctor has fully explained the purpose.

https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/servicesandsupport/informed-consent-for-carers
Informed consent for carers - Better Health Channel
Informed consent means that a person understands their health condition and what the
proposed treatment is. Before making a decision about medical treatment ...

https://www.health.act.gov.au/about-our-health-system/consumer-involvement/informed-
consent
Informed consent | Health
6 Feb 2020 ... Informed Consent in healthcare means we give you clear and easy to
understand information to help you make the right decision for your ...
* Very impressive!
**#** In my view when the TGA and its advisors themselves either didn’t know all relevant
issues and/or ignored it to have it made known to potential participants of the “clinical trials”
then I view this underlines that this might be a criminal conspiracy to defraud participants of the
true details such as adverse reactions. I cannot accept that somehow the FDA (USA) already way
back in August 2020 published the list of dangers and yet the Commonwealth Department of
Health pretend;
Again the (commonwealth) Department of Health claimed:
QUOTE
p20 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Any vaccine can cause some mild side effects. The main side effects from vaccines are some soreness,
redness or swelling where you had the injection, a headache or mild fever and fatigue. Most of these can be
managed with some mild pain relief and are no cause for alarm.
END QUOTE

As in the past knowingly contaminated polio vaccinates were used in Australia, then I view this
to underlines a criminal investigation is warranted. We must enforce the rule of law against not
just ordinary citizens but also against Members of any Australian Parliament, their officials, the
police, etc.

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates


QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond
the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say
that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the
Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as
any private person would be.
END QUOTE

HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates


QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the Parliament of
the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the provisions of this
Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles
are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
END QUOTE

The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE

Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people and the states on
terms that are just to both.

END QUOTE

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates


QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?

Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.

p21 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE

It may be noted that anyone who participated in this elaborate “LOCK STEP SCENARIO”
ONE WORLD ORDER scam better check out:

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/416/232/
Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 (1974)

It is a case that underlines that even a judge who acts in defiance of a constitutional right acts not
as a judge but as a private person and can be personally sued.
Likewise with politicians, doctors, police, health care workers, journalist, etc.

*. Aren’t certain whistleblower police officers in NSW?

**#** I understand there are many and what needs to be done is the Australian Federal Police to
investigate matters dilengently and appropriately. This, as when it comes to any “infectious
disease” that requires quarantine then it is a Commonwealth legal power and as such any State
legislation, and enforcement of such state legislation, even by the courts would in my view all be
without legal validity and it is then appropriate for the Australian Federal Police to investigate it
as crimes against the Commonwealth.

I will for this below quote my 1 August 2021 correspondence to Victorian Premier Daniel
Andrews also.
QUOTE
Mr Daniel Andrews Premier 1-8-2021
[email protected]

Cc; Mr Martin Pakula, [email protected], [email protected]

Re: 20210801-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Mr Daniel Andrews Premier of Victoria-


COMPLAINT-suppl-01
Sir,
It is not uncommon that people are blinded to the truth regardless how much it might be in
front of them..

Let us consider that the Victorian Chief Health Officer supported by ongoing Victorian
Government advertising at huge cost to the taxpayers is repeatedly using the mantra that COVID
is very dangerous and for this to spread the infection from one person to another one must
compulsory wear a face mask, social distancing, lockdowns and even curfews. If this line of
claim by the Chief health Officer as well as by politicians is the truth, and for argument sake let
us for purpose of this issue go along with this, then what on earth is the Victorian Chief Health
officer and the Victorian Government and for that any other State/Territory Government doing in
something that is exclusive Commonwealth legislative powers?
Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the Commonwealth
legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
END QUOTE

p22 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE

Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the states will
nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.

Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws will, however,
remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of making these new laws will be
all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
END QUOTE

Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates


QUOTE
My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in
the meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
END QUOTE

After all, if the mantra of it being an “infectious disease” for which quarantine (isolation, etc) is
needed then this clearly is a Commonwealth legislative area. Little wonder we have the
Biosecurity Act 2015 (Cth) that dictates the protocol how to deal with an infectious disease issue.
Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
Convention)
QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-

I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine. That simply applies to
quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
END QUOTE

No overtures of any State/Territory government can make it lawful to apply any compulsory
mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, curfews, QR, etc, where it related to “infectious”
disease control.
The Framers of the Constitution realizing that infectious disease could be across borderlines of
states or from anyone entering the Commonwealth of Australia therefore held that the
Commonwealth would be the more appropriate power to deal with it and not hampered by state
border issues.

We then have to consider also the following:


https://www.dnaindia.com/science/report-vaccinated-people-may-spread-covid-19-at-the-
same-rate-as-unvaccinated-says-leaked-us-data-2903404
Vaccinated people might spread COVID-19 at the same rate as unvaccinated, says leaked US data
Leaked unpublished data in US reveals fully-vaccinated people
may be spreading COVID-19 at the same rate as unvaccinated.
Oh boy, here we had about 20% of Australians being jabbed and in the end it might be more
having placed once health at risk regarding all kinds of adverse reactions even to die and in the
end the cliché of Federal Minister for Health Greg Hunt to do it for your “Dad, Mum,
grandparents and others” seems to be utterly nonsense. After all, if one can spread the Delta
p23 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
regardless of being vaccinated or not then there can be no protection in that regard for “Dad,
Mum, grandparents and others”.
We need however to take proper consideration as to any claim.
There could be 5 people in a room all suffering from hay-fever and is this than meaning that
Hay-fever is contagious? It might be just that those 5 people came together as a group session
because they all suffered from hay-fever. As such, being together in itself may not have any
meaning as to any ratio and certainly not that Hay-fever can be spread to all people in the same
room, because of the 5 being all in the one room and all suffering from Hay-fever.
Translate this to the Delta claimed corona virus. If one or more persons happen to live in the
same household than does this means that there is a transmission from Delta between members
of the same household? Let us use an example. In a nursing home there are bacterium found in
the water tank that caused many of the residents to succumb to this and die. Now we have that
the bacterium turned out to be Legionnaires Disease and well the nursing home not wanting to
get the blame for failure of keeping its water tanks free from this now announces that the
residents really died because of Delta (as previous was done to claim it was COVID-19) and well
the nursing home is so to say off the hook and might even make money out of it by claiming it is
Delta and spreading from one resident to another and even to staff members and so entitled to
certain government payments. As such, something that may have absolutely nothing to do with
either any corona virus or any transmission between people might nevertheless be claimed as
such and the politicians rather over up this FRAUD as after all it serves their mantra.
Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.
Because symptoms of INFLUENZA are also those of the claimed COVID-19 then the
denounced PCR testing will not whatsoever tell the difference between a INFLUENZA (non-
coronavirus) and COVID-19 (CORONAVIRUS). As such, to establish any true case of
CORONAVIRUS one would need a proper medical assessment of a person allegedly suffering
from COVID-19/Delta and unless this medical examination can point out that the patient suffers
from a certain symptom that does not correlate with influenza then it must be deemed to be
influenza.
As to my understanding INFLUENZA is not an infectious disease that can be spread from one
person to another (as in 1919 extensive testing was done to establish this) then it would be within
the State/Territory Government to regulate INFLUENZA, albeit as it is not transmissible from
one person to another then compulsory mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, curfews,
QR, etc, all have no scientific justification. If it is to be argued that INFLUENZA is contagious
and by spreading it from one person to another then obviously it falls within the limited
legislative powers of the Commonwealth.
Either way, the States/Territories have no legitimate claim to pursue compulsory mask
wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, curfews, QR, etc.
While the Victorian Government may argue that it until 1986 had the Fairfield infectious disease
hospital and so this must surely justify that it had the legislative powers, etc. Well, is that
meaning that if I am repeatedly speeding in violation of road speed limits if then I am finally
caught I can claim that the speed limits do not apply to me because I for so long did my own
thing regardless of what was legally permissible? Come on, while it might be complimentary to
the Victorian Government to have sought to provide facilities for infectious diseases it
nevertheless cannot mean it had legislative powers for this. And, without legislative powers there
neither can be executive powers and certainly not administrative powers either!
“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and
p24 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
name of law, is in reality no law , but is wholly void and ineffective for any
purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment…In legal
contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed….Since an
unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties,
confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone,
affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it….A void act cannot
be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to
supersede any existing law. indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the
fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution) it is superseded thereby. No one is
bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
[Bonnett v. Vallier] US Supreme court ruling.
While there are State Government deploying police forces to deny citizens their constitutional
rights to protest, the above indicates that any fines issues cannot be legally justified, as if there is
no legislative powers in the first place to force compulsory mask wearing, social distancing,
curfews, lockdowns, QR, etc, then no amount of fines can alter this.

However, it could be deemed to violate the FREEDOM OF SPEECH of citizens so much


embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
Citizen can and are constitutionally entitled to express their opposition against any purported
laws as a way to indicate to politicians that they are elected to REPRESENT the people and not
that the people are there to serve them as puppets-on-a-string.
Time and time again police officers are voicing they are there to enforce the directions of the
Chief Health Officer, however as the Chief health officer can only exercise “administrative
powers” then any police officer acting on behalf of the Chief Health officer is no more but acting
as a private security guard and not as a police officer acting to enforce the “executive powers” of
the government. This I view means that every police officer involved in using violence, fining
persons, etc, are then themselves violating the rule of law and can be held personally liable for
assault, etc.
It may be noted that anyone who participated in this elaborate “LOCK STEP SCENARIO”
ONE WORLD ORDER scam better check out:
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/416/232/
Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 (1974)
It is a case that underlines that even a judge who acts in defiance of a constitutional right acts not
as a judge but as a private person and can be personally sued.
Likewise with politicians, doctors, police, health care workers, journalist, etc.

https://gab.com/BeachMilk/posts/106629591332231565
Australian newspaper editor Barclay Crawford directing his journalists to ridicule
anyone not supporting the COVID death-shot
In my view journalist (including television presenters) who are willing to bring their own family
members to the slaughter cannot be provided with any compassion if they are convicted of their
evil doing to assist in genocide and crimes against humanity. After all, they were ruthless to
pursue whatever to keep a job and then as they made clear in the Nuremberg trials
“FOLLOWING ORDERS” is no excuse.

p25 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.


INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
I understand that numerous doctors and scientist have stood the test of time to maintain their
exposure of the “LOCK STEP SCENARIO” ONE WORLD ORDER scam and at cost of jobs,
etc, Those to me are the real hero’s.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®


(Our name is our motto!)
END QUOTE

*. May I take the conclusion that you do not accept that Prime Minister Scott Morrsion was
correct to blame the victims for their deaths?
**#** As this document indicates there really never was sufficient information provided to any
participant (as they are called) to any “clinical trial” as in my view the TGA and the
commonwealth Department of health appeared not to have a clue what really was involved with
the so called vaccines. If they didn’t know then how could then any GP know better. Basically
they seem to me to have been parroting whatever they were fed as information, and the
Government actively pursuing a obstruction of dissenting views to request Big Tech and others
to remove articles that are not as to their mantra may underline also that no person could ever
provide “informed consent” as they were entitled upon as they were only given some limited
details, if any, that suited the what I view genocidal and crimes against humanity intentions.
In my view, calling Prime Minister Scott Morrison a moron would possibly even offend those
who are morons, and so I will not do so. If you were to consider the amount of time it might
likely take to explain to a citizen, even if the person is competent in the English language, as to
the adverse reactions and benefits of any vaccination (jabbing) then in my view a pharmacist c
Even with an 8-hour (480 minutes) shift with more than 100 persons this would mean about less
than 5 minutes per person to explain all adverse reaction issues, etc,, sign the :”informed
consent” form and jab the person besides the 15 minutes observation, etc. claiming to jab more
than 100 person’s in 1 day cannot reasonably have explained all relevant details. Any one
knowing Time & Motion study would be well aware this never could have been involving
“informed consent”. While it may be argued there was some sort of a tent in front of the
pharmacy, I hardly could accept that anyone could seriously hold appropriate time for a person to
listen and consider all relevant details in particular adverse reaction possibilities while standing
in the street with all the traffic and other noises about. It appears to me the video rather indicates
people to be provided some sort of pamphlet and I view this hardly can be considered appropriate
when the person’s health issues may be relevant to make an “informed decision”. In my view,
the Australian Federal Police should investigate what precisely the pamphlets were stating and
how much it really addressed issues of each particular person involved. Blaming the victim for
making a decision , as I understand Prime Minister Scott Morrison is doing, is utterly
deplorable and I view he and fellow ministers should be thrown out by the Governor-
General by rescinding the commissions and neither should the leader of the Opposition be
commissioned as he clearly has also failed to ensure matters are appropriately and lawfully
conducted.
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)


MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)
p26 3-8-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® a1 bout the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: [email protected]. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati

You might also like