Basic 2 Work in Team Environment
Basic 2 Work in Team Environment
BASIC COMPETENCY # 2
Sector:
You need to complete this module before you can perform the module on PRACTICE CAREER
PROFESSIONALISM.
LIST OF COMPETENCIES
2 WORK IN TEAM
Working in team Environment 500311106
ENVIRONMENT
MODULES OF INSTRUCTION
MODULE DESCRIPTOR : This module covers the skills, knowledge, and attitudes to identify
role and responsibility as a member of a team
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
CONTENTS:
Team Work
Team Role
Role and responsibilities
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA:
CONDITIONS:
Workplace
CD,VCD,tapes
Manuals
Handouts
Info Sheets
ASSESSMENT METHODS
Written Examination
Observation
Simulation
Role Playing
LEARNING OUTCOME 1
1. Read Information Sheet 2.1-1 If you have some problem on the content of the
on Team Work information sheet don’t hesitate to approach your
facilitator. If you feel that you are now
knowledgeable on the content of the information
sheet, you can now answer self check 2.1-1
provided in the module.
Answer self-check for 2.1-1 Refer your answer to answer key 2.1-1
2. Read Information Sheet 2.1-2 If you have some problem on the content of the
on Team Role information sheet don’t hesitate to approach your
facilitator. If you feel that you are now
knowledgeable on the content of the information
sheet, you can now answer self check 2.1-2
provided in the module.
Answer self-check for 2.1-2 Refer your answer to answer key 2.1-2
3. Read Information Sheet 2.1-3 If you have some problem on the content of the
on Role and Responsibilities information sheet don’t hesitate to approach your
with team environment facilitator. If you feel that you are now
knowledgeable on the content of the information
sheet, you can now answer self check 2.1-3
provided in the module.
Answer self-check for 2.1-3 Refer your answer to answer key 2.1-3
Learning Objectives:
What is Team?
A Team is a group of people working together to achieve common objectives and willing to
forego individual autonomy to the extent necessary to achieve those objectives.
A smallest team consists of 2 people and the upper limit can be to the size of the
organization. The whole organization can work as a team if its members develop a common
style of working i.e., constructive and cooperative. This is normally described as teamwork. An
organization is viewed as a network of teams, temporary and permanent.
For a team to achieve it’s common objectives, its members should share its objectives
and be identified wholeheartedly with them. By joining a team, the individual member “signs on”
the team’s objectives, he enters into a contract as a condition of becoming a member of the
There cannot be a team without a leader who has ultimate responsibility for deciding the
degree to which autonomy of the team member has to be constrained. He has to exercise his
responsibility in a way that it does not erode the commitment of the team members. He needs
to establish the constraints through a consultation process of problem solving and negotiations.
Aside from any required technical proficiency, a wide variety of social skills are desirable for
successful teamwork, including:
• Listening - it is important to listen to other people's ideas. When people are allowed to
freely express their ideas, these initial ideas will produce other ideas.
• Questioning - it is important to ask questions, interact, and discuss the objectives of the
team.
• Persuading - individuals are encouraged to exchange, defend, and then to ultimately
rethink their ideas.
• Respecting - it is important to treat others with respect and to support their ideas.
• Helping - it is crucial to help one's coworkers, which is the general theme of teamwork.
• Sharing - it is important to share with the team to create an environment of teamwork.
• Participating - all members of the team are encouraged to participate in the team.
TEAM ROLES
Learning objective:
Meredith Belbin (1993) basing on his research proposed nine roles that successful teams
should have:
Coordinator
This person will have a clear view of the team objectives and will be skilled at
inviting the contribution of team members in achieving these, rather than just pushing his
or her own view. The coordinator (or chairperson) is self-disciplined and applies this
discipline to the team. They are confident and mature, and will summarize the view of
the group and will be prepared to take a decision on the basis of this.
Learning objectives:
1. Learn and apply the team roles and responsibilities.
2. Know the specific responsibilities of team members in a team.
Working in groups is a very common phenomenon in the private sector and government
agencies. It is important that each member of a team to not only be an active participant in the
team, but also to be certain that all other team members are contributing members of the team.
There are many ways in which members of a team can contribute. Some may lead with key
concepts; others may supply key details; while others may assist in sharpening or further
development of certain details or concepts. It is expected that you will discuss your individual
efforts with other members of the team. You may also discuss the problem with class members
from other teams, but not to the exclusion of the members of your own team.
Team members don't have specific responsibilities, but their participation is critical to
the team's success. Team members must agree to:
Librarian -
CONTENTS :
- Communication process
- Team structure/team roles
- Group planning and decision making
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA :
CONDITIONS :
Learning guides
Transparencies
CD’s
METHODOLOGIES:
ASSESSMENT METHODS:
LEARNING OUTCOME 2
1. Read Information Sheet 2.2-1 If you have some problem on the content of the
information sheet don’t hesitate to approach your
on Communication Process
facilitator.
If you feel that you are now knowledgeable on the
content of the information sheet, you can now
answer self check 2.2-1 provided in the module
Answer self-check for 2.2-1 Refer your answer to answer key 2.2-1
If you have some problem on the content of the
2. Read Information Sheet 2.2-2 information sheet don’t hesitate to approach your
on Team Structure/Team Roles facilitator.
If you feel that you are now knowledgeable on the
content of the information sheet, you can now
answer self check 2.2-2 provided in the module
Answer self-check for 2.2-2 Refer your answer to answer key 2.2-2
3. Read Information Sheet 2.2-3 If you have some problem on the content of the
on Role and Responsibilities information sheet don’t hesitate to approach your
with team environment facilitator.
If you feel that you are now knowledgeable on the
content of the information sheet, you can now
answer self check 2.2-3 provided in the module
Answer self-check for 2.2-3 Refer your answer to answer key 2.2-3
COMMUNICATION PROCESS
Learning objectives:
Communication is the ability to share information with people and to understand what
information and feelings are being conveyed by others. Communication can take on many forms
including gestures, facial expressions, signs, vocalizations (including pitch and tone), in
addition to speech and written communication. Trainers, trainee frequently use nonverbal
methods to communicate. Trainee often show disinterest in school by avoiding eye contact or
sitting back in their chairs with their arms folded across their chests during instruction. Staff
members may indicate that they have time to talk but they may show disinterest by making
themselves busy to something unimportant while you are trying to talk. Conversely, a smiling,
nodding face indicates that the listener is interested in what we are saying and encourages us
to continue. Communication includes a broad range of actions which help the students work
more effectively with their teachers.
Listen Actively
Look at the person who's speaking to you, nod, ask probing questions and acknowledge
what's said by paraphrasing points that have been made. If you're unclear about something
that's been said, ask for more information to clear up any confusion before moving on.
Effective communication is a vital part of any team, so the value of good listening skills
shouldn't be underestimated.
Get Involved
Share suggestions, ideas, solutions and proposals with your team members. Take the time to
help your fellow teammates, no matter the request. You can guarantee there will be a time in
the future when you'll need some help or advice. And if you've helped them in past, they'll be
more than happy to lend a helping hand.
Learning objectives:
1. Use high interaction among members of the team to increase trust and openness.
In a team, individual members tend to be highly aware of their responsibility, whether it stems
from social pressure or the fulfillment of personal need. Teams are capable of performing
functions and achieving some goals more efficiently and accurately than individuals can.
Although there is evidence that individuals sometimes perform better than teams, the quality of
decision making is much high in teams working under certain conditions.
The team and the individual members are dependent on each other. Their relationships play a
vital role in the success of the team. As the individual member grows and matures, so does the
team.
No team can achieve its performance – potential without developing all three types of skills. The
mix is crucial. Too much of one at the expense of others will result in lower team performance.
But team doesn’t need to have all the complementary skills in place at the beginning.
It is not uncommon for one or more members to take responsibility to learn the skills in which
the group is deficient, thereby allowing the team to reach its full potential.
The activities considered in team building typically include goal setting, development of
interpersonal relations among team members role analysis to clarify each member’s role and
responsibilities and team process analysis. Of course team building may emphasize or exclude
certain activities depending on the purpose of the development effort and the specific problems
with which the team is confronted. Basically, however team building attempts to use high
interaction among members to increase trust and openness.
It may be beneficial to begin by having members attempt to define the goals and priorities of
the team. This will bring to the surface different perceptions of what the team’s purpose may
be. Following this, members can evaluate the team’s performance – how effective are they in
structuring priorities and achieving their goals? This should identify potential problem areas.
This self critique discussion of means and ends can be done with members of the total present
or, where large size impinges on a free interchange of views, may initially take place in smaller
groups followed up by the sharing of their findings with the total team.
Team building can also address itself to clarifying each member’s role on the team. Each role
can be identified and clarified. Previous ambiguities can be brought to the surface. For some
individuals, it may offer one of the few opportunities they have had to think through thoroughly
what their job is all about and what specific tasks they are expected to carry out if the team is
to optimize its effectiveness.
Inter-group Development
Although there are several approaches for improving inter-group relations, a popular method
emphasizes problem solving. In this method, each group meets independently to develop lists
of its perception of itself, the other group, and how it believes the other group perceives it. The
groups then share their list, after which similarities and differences are discussed. Differences
are clearly articulated, and the groups look for the causes of the disparities.
Are the groups’ goals at odds? Were perceptions distorted? On what basis were stereotypes
formulated? Have some differences been caused by misunderstandings of intention? Have
words and concepts been defined differently by each group? Answers to questions like these
clarify the exact nature of the conflict. Once the causes of the difficulty have been identified,
the groups can move to the integration phase – working to develop solutions that will improve
relations between the groups, sub-groups, with members from each of the conflicting groups,
can now be created for further diagnosis and to begin to formulate possible alternative actions
that will improve relations.
Involving role. One initiates action. A team member may motivate others by getting them
involved in an idea or problem. The involving role consists of asking questions of other
members to "bring out" or stimulate each team member.
Supporting role. A team member gives an added dimension to good ideas by their support.
By supporting and encouraging others, the team member strengthens confidence and trust.
Compromising role. One member gives up something for problem solving to take place.
Compromising can lead to team productivity. It is a role that is necessary for cooperation and
collaboration.
Learning objectives:
1. Identify the particular problem or situation- what the problem or situation is; analyze it,
find its causes, determine its seriousness, and decide whether or not it is something
deserving attention.
2. Establish a criteria or course of action leading to a workable solution. For example, in a
flood calamity, you must determine the time, the effort, and the money that will be
involved in helping the flood victims as acceptable solutions to solve the crisis.
3. Research possible solutions or courses of action – this implies using interviews, library
work, observation, experiment-actions as tools for arriving at valid conclusions and
solutions to the problem at hand.
Abstract- Many managers like to believe that they are accomplished in such group
decision-making processes as action planning, goal setting and problem-solving.
However, their ability to implement such techniques effectively is often hindered by their
lack of understanding of the dynamics of these group decision-making processes. As a
result, these managers often end up perpetuating problems that they themselves create
through their insensitivity to the needs of other group members. Hence, instead of
achieving a consensus, such managers only serve their own interests by leading the
group to situations such as decision-making by lack of response or by authority role.
Sometimes, they lead the group toward decision-making by minority rule or by majority
role, as the case might be. The better way to achieve consensus would be for them to
track how decisions are made and ensure that they are achieved by true consultation.
The most common--and perhaps least visible--group decision-making method is that in which
someone suggests an idea and, before anyone else has said anything about it, someone else
suggests another idea, until the group eventually finds one it will act on. This results in shooting
down the original idea before it has really been considered. All the ideas that are bypassed
have, in a sense, been rejected by the group. But because the "rejections" have been simply a
common decision not to support the idea, the proposers feel that their suggestions have
"plopped." The floors of most conference rooms are littered with "plops."
Many groups start out with--or quickly set up--a power structure that makes it clear that the
chairman (or someone else in authority) will make the ultimate decision. The group can generate
ideas and hold free discussion, but at any time the chairman may say that, having heard the
discussion, he or she has decided upon a given plan. Whether this method is effective depends
a great deal upon whether the chairman is a sufficiently good listener to have culled the right
information on which to make the decision. Furthermore, if the group must also implement the
One of the most-often-heard complaints of group members is that they feel "railroaded" into
some decision. Usually, this feeling results from one, two, or three people employing tactics that
produce action--and therefore must be considered decisions--but which are taken without the
consent of the majority.
A single person can "enforce" a decision, particularly if he or she is in some kind of chairmanship
role, by not giving opposition an opportunity to build up. For example, the manager might consult
a few members on even the most seemingly insignificant step and may get either a negative or
positive reaction. The others have remained silent. If asked how they concluded there was
agreement, chances are they will say, "Silence means consent, doesn't it? Everyone has a
chance to voice opposition." If the group members are interviewed later, however, it sometimes
is discovered that an actual majority was against a given idea, but that each one hesitated to
speak up because she thought that all the other silent ones were for it. They too were trapped
by "silence means consent."
Finally, a common form of minority rule is for two or more members to come to a quick and
powerful agreement on a course of action, then challenge the group with a quick, "Does anyone
object?," and, if no one raises their voice within two seconds, they proceed with "Let's go ahead
then." Again the trap is the assumption that silence means consent.
More familiar decision-making procedures are often taken for granted as applying to any group
situation because they reflect our political system. One simple version is to poll everyone's
opinion following some period of discussion. If the majority of participants feels the same way,
it is often assumed that is the decision. The other method is the more formal one of stating a
clear alternative and asking for votes in favor of it, votes against it, and abstentions.
On the surface, this method seems completely sound, but surprisingly often it turns out that
decisions made by this method are not well implemented, even by the group that made the
decision. What is wrong? Typically, it turns out that two kinds of psychological barriers exist:
First, the minority members often feel there was an insufficient period of discussion for them to
really get their point of view across; hence they feel misunderstood and sometimes resentful.
In other words, voting creates coalitions, and the preoccupation of the losing coalition is not
how to implement what the majority wants, but how to win the next battle. If voting is to be used,
the group must be sure that it has created a climate in which members feel they have had their
day in court--and where all members feel obligated to go along with the majority decision.
Because there are time constraints in coming to a group decision and because there is no
perfect system, a decision by consensus is one of the most effective methods. Unfortunately, it
is one of the most time- consuming techniques for group decision-making. It is also quite
important to understand that consensus is not the same thing as unanimity. Rather, it is a state
of affairs where communications have been sufficiently open (and the group climate has
been sufficiently supportive) to make everyone in the group feel that they have had their fair
chance to influence the decision. Someone then tests for the "sense of the meeting," carefully
avoiding formal procedures like voting. If there is a clear alternative to which most members
subscribe and if those who oppose it feel they have had their chance to influence, then a
consensus exists. Operationally, it would be defined by the fact that those members who would
not take the majority alternative nevertheless understand it clearly and are prepared to support
it in deference to any others that are probably about as good.
In order to achieve such a condition, time must be allowed by the group for all members to state
their opposition--and to state it fully enough to get the feeling that others really do understand
them. This condition is essential if they are later to free themselves of the preoccupation that
they could have gotten their point of view across if others had understood what they really had
in mind. Only by careful listening to the opposition can such feelings be forestalled, thereby
allowing effective group decisions to be reached.
Of course, recognizing the several types of group decision-making is only part of the process.
Managers must be specific in their approach to the one that is best in their own situation.
1. Identify the Problem. Tell specifically what the problem is and how you experience it. Cite
specific examples.
In the identification phase of problem-solving, avoid references to solutions. This can trigger
disagreement too early in the process and prevent the group from ever making meaningful
progress.
Once there seems to be a fairly clear understanding of what the problem is, this definition should
be written in very precise language. If a group is involved, it should be displayed on a flip chart
or chalkboard.
2. Clarify the Problem. This step is most important when working with a group of people. If the
problem is not adequately clarified so that everyone views it the same, the result will be that
people will offer solutions to different problems. To clarify the problem, ask someone in the
group to paraphrase the problem as they understand it. Then ask the other group members if
they see it essentially the same way. Any differences must be resolved before going any further.
In clarifying the problem, ask the group the following questions: Who is involved with the
problem? Who is likely to be affected? Can we get them involved in solving the problem? Who
legitimately or logically should be included in the decision? Are there others who need to be
consulted prior to a decision?
These questions assume that commitment from those involved (and affected by the problem)
is desirable in implementing any changes or solutions. The best way to get this commitment is
to include those involved and affected by the problem in determining solutions.
This is probably an easier process to follow when dealing with problems involving physical
things rather than with interpersonal or social issues. Typically, interpersonal and social
problems are more likely to spring from a dynamic constellation of causes that will be more
difficult to solve if the causes are only tackled one at a time. Still, whether dealing with physical
or social problems, it is important to seek those causes that are most fundamental in producing
the problem. Don't waste energy on causes that have only a tangential effect.
4. Solicit Alternative Solutions To the Problem. This step calls for identifying as many
solutions to the problem as possible before discussing the specific advantages and
disadvantages of each. What happens frequently in problem-solving is that the first two or three
suggested solutions are debated and discussed for the full time allowed for the entire problem-
solving session. As a result, many worthwhile ideas are never identified or considered. By
identifying many solutions, a superior idea often surfaces that reduces or even eliminates the
need for discussing details of more debatable issues. These solutions may be logical attacks at
the cause or they may be creative solutions that need not be rational. Therefore, it is important
5. Selecting One or More Alternatives for Action. Before selecting specific alternatives for
action, it is advisable to identify criteria the desired solution must meet. This can eliminate
unnecessary discussion and help focus the group toward the solution (or solutions) that will
most likely work.
At this point, it becomes necessary to look for and discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of options that appear viable. The task is for the group members to come to a mutual agreement
on which solutions to actually put into action. It is desirable for positive comments to be
encouraged (and negative comments to be ignored or even discouraged) about any of the
solutions. One solution should be the best, of course, but none should be labeled as a "bad
idea."
6. Plan for Implementation. This requires looking at the details that must be performed by
someone for a solution to be effectively activated. Once the required steps are identified, it
means assigning these to someone for action: it also means setting a time for completion.
Not to be forgotten when developing the implementation plan: Who needs to be informed of this
action?
7. Clarify the Contract. This is to insure that everyone clearly understands what the agreement
is that people will do to implement a solution. It is a summation and re statement of what people
had agreed to do and when it is expected they will have it done. It rules out possible
misinterpretation of expectations.
9. Provide for Evaluation And Accountability. After the plan has been implemented and
sufficient time has elapsed for it to have an effect, the group should reconvene and discuss
evaluation and accountability. Have the agreed upon actions been carried out? Have people
done what they said they would do?
If they have not accomplished their assignments, it is possible that they ran into trouble that
must be considered. Or it may be that they simply need to be reminded or held accountable for
not having lived up to their end of the contract. Once the actions have been completed, it is
necessary to assess their effectiveness. Did the solution work? If not, can a revision make it
work? What actions are necessary to implement changes?
Other Considerations
Keeping adequate records of all steps completed (especially brainstorming) can allow energy
to be "recycled." Falling back on thinking that was previously done makes it unnecessary to
"plow the same ground twice."
If this happens, the task becomes to immediately compute what new course will be effective.
Several course corrections may be necessary before getting back on track to where you want
to go. Still, once the desired course is attained, careful monitoring is required to avoid drifting
off course again unknowingly. Viewing problem-solving in this realistic manner can save a lot
of the frustration that comes from expecting it to always produce the right answers.