11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

Official reprint from UpToDate®

www.uptodate.com ©2020 UpToDate, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Overview of surgical procedures used in the

management of burn injuries
Authors: Jorge Leon-Villapalos, MD, FRCS, Peter Dziewulski, MD, FRCS
Section Editors: Marc G Jeschke, MD, PhD, Charles E Butler, MD, FACS
Deputy Editor: Kathryn A Collins, MD, PhD, FACS

All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.

Literature review current through: Oct 2020. | This topic last updated: Jan 29, 2020.

INTRODUCTION

Once the burn patient has been resuscitated and stabilized, restoring anatomy, preserving
function, and rehabilitating the patient are the next priorities. To accomplish this, the
surgeon must evaluate the extent to which tissue is missing and identify potential donor
sites or other solutions to best manage skin and soft tissue defects. The aim is to reconstruct
like tissue with like tissue, restoring function first, which supersedes immediate concerns
over cosmesis. Appropriate measures are taken to limit scarring in the postoperative period;
however, once the patient has progressed through the acute phase of the injury, including
acute wound coverage, reassessment of the wounds may necessitate wound revisions to
achieve an optimal cosmetic outcome.

An overview of the surgical techniques used for burn reconstruction is reviewed here. The
general management of the burn patient and management of burn injuries according to
depth of injury are discussed in separate topic reviews. (See "Overview of the management
of the severely burned patient" and "Treatment of deep burns" and "Treatment of superficial
burns requiring hospital admission".)

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

Burns are a specialized form of trauma, and, as such, they are managed according to
recognized protocols of trauma resuscitation. Characteristically, these protocols assess the
trauma/burn patient through a primary survey, a secondary survey, and a process of
continuous reassessment that ultimately refers the patient to a definitive treatment facility.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 1/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

The primary survey addresses life-saving priorities through a structured approach that
includes examining sequentially Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability (neurologic status),
and Environment (exposure of the patient with prevention of hypothermia). This is called the
ABCDE approach. The secondary survey subsequently examines the patient from head to
toe, completing the trauma assessment.

There are two important priorities within the primary survey that are specific and exclusive
to the burn patient. These are the assessment of the total body surface area (TBSA) or extent
of the burn wound and the assessment of the depth of the burn wound. These are of
paramount importance because the assessment of the TBSA determines the level of fluid
resuscitation, while the assessment of the depth of the burn wound determines the need for
surgical debridement, rather than a conservative approach.

Any burn larger than 10 percent TBSA in a child or 15 percent TBSA in an adult requires fluid
resuscitation according to specific formulas. We use the Parkland formula, though many
others are available and are used according to burn unit preference. These burns are called
resuscitation burns.

The assessment of the burn depth determines the categorization of burns into the following
types according to the dermal damage and to clinical parameters mainly related to
preservation or destruction of the skin's multiple vascular plexuses.

● Superficial or epidermal burns (ie, first degree) – These burns are characterized by
extensive erythema due to hyperemia of the dermal plexus or outpouring of burn
inflammatory mediators. They exhibit pain but a lack of blisters and characteristically
heal without the need for surgery and with no sequelae such as scars or pigmentation.
Superficial burns are not included in percent TBSA determination.

● Partial-thickness or dermal burns (ie, second degree) – These burns involve dermal
damage and may or may not require surgery in the acute period depending on the
depth of the dermis involved. The pathognomonic feature of partial-thickness burns is
the breakdown of the epidermis, with presence of blisters and exposed dermis. These
may require reconstructive surgery for resulting scars appearing as a result of delayed
healing or deep damage.

According to the level of dermis involved, these are subdivided into:

• Superficial partial-thickness or superficial dermal burns – These burns affect

partially the papillary dermis. They exhibit pain, brisk capillary refill, blistering, and a
moist and pink appearance and may heal without surgery with dressing care only,
though characteristically they may require surgery if they are extensive to debride
the denuded epidermis and to promote dermal preservation with specialized
dermal-preserving materials (eg, Biobrane, Suprathel). These characteristically heal
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 2/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

in less than three weeks and do not leave scars that require reconstructive surgery,
though pigmentation changes post-burn may appear.

• Mid-dermal partial-thickness burns – These burns affect the papillary dermis and
the upper part of the neighboring reticular dermis. These exhibit pain that may be
less compared with superficial partial-thickness burns as the deeper damage to the
neurovascular supply of the dermis reduces the pain component of the injury. The
capillary refill is more sluggish and difficult to ascertain, and the appearance may be
drier and paler. These may require surgery in the acute period to debride nonviable
dermis and provide dermal preservation coverage. These are more likely to scar and
require reconstructive surgery once healed.

• Deep dermal partial-thickness burns – These burns affect deeply the reticular
dermis and can be considered a precursor or potential for full-thickness burns.
These may not exhibit pain and present with a dry, cherry-red-color appearance.
These always require surgery and skin coverage in the acute period and therefore
will leave scars that may require reconstruction at a later stage.

● Full-thickness burns (ie, third degree) – Full-thickness burns damage the entire thickness
of the dermis and its neurovascular supply. These appear as leathery brown injuries with
or without thrombosed vessels and are insensate and without self-healing capacity. They
always require debridement and graft coverage in the acute period and always leave
scarring that may need reconstructive surgery at a later stage.

BURN WOUND EXCISION

Early burn wound excision is essential in the management of deep burn injuries to eliminate
necrotic and potentially infected tissue [1,2]. Best practice dictates that definitive skin
coverage should be attempted at the time of debridement, as soon as possible after the
burn injury, whenever possible. Management of the burn patient poses several challenges
due to the nature and extent of the injury. While burn wound excision and coverage within
the first five days is optimal, it is not always possible. The burn-injured patient often suffers
extensive skin loss that can occur at multiple anatomic sites, and multiply injured patients
may also have other injuries that impact their management (eg, inhalational injury, head
injury, extremity trauma). (See 'Burn wound coverage' below and "Overview of inpatient
management of the adult trauma patient", section on 'Introduction' and "Treatment of deep
burns".)

Early excision of necrotic tissue and coverage of the burn wound has been one of the single
greatest advancements in the treatment of patients with severe burns and a mainstay of
therapy [3-5]. In an early review evaluating burn wound care in 3561 burn patients over a 14-

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 3/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

year period, a significant decrease in length of hospital stay (23 days in 1979 to 14.2 days in
1990) was correlated with a decrease in surgery interval (14.8 days in 1979 to 6.1 days in
1990) [6]. The surgery interval reflected the rapidity with which the surgical team was able to
close/cover the burn wound. Mortality also decreased significantly while burn severity
indices remained constant. A meta-analysis of six trials showed a significant reduction in
mortality for burn-injured patients (with or without inhalation injury) undergoing early
excision and grafting compared with conservative treatment of dressing changes and
delayed skin grafts following eschar separation (relative risk [RR] 0.36, 95% CI 0.20-0.65) [5].
The length of hospital stay was shorter for the early excision group, but there were no
differences in the duration of sepsis, wound healing time, or skin graft take between the two
groups. Early wound closure is also associated with decreased severity of hypertrophic
scarring, joint contractures, and stiffness and promotes faster rehabilitation [7,8]. However,
burn wound coverage alone does not eliminate the hypermetabolic response [4]. (See
"Hypermetabolic response to moderate-to-severe burn injury and management".)

BURN WOUND COVERAGE

Various reconstructive procedures are used to restore function and cover burn wounds in
the acute period and to manage contractures and improve aesthetics of resultant burn
scars. As with any patient with soft tissue defects, wound coverage ascends the
reconstructive ladder whenever difficulty is encountered, providing restoration of anatomy
at lower steps or levels of the ladder when possible. In ascending order of complexity,
surgical procedures used in burn wound coverage and reconstruction include the following,
which are discussed in more detail below:

● Direct wound closure (see 'Direct wound closure' below)

● Skin grafting (see 'Skin grafting' below and 'Use of skin substitutes' below)
● Coverage with expanded tissue (see 'Tissue expansion' below)
● Tissue transfer – Local flaps, pedicle flaps (see 'Flap reconstruction' below)

The acute burn wound or scar contracture or deformity that may result later is highly
variable in terms of size, shape, anatomic location, and level of healing. As such, burn
reconstruction often requires the use and combination of several types of procedures in one
or more body regions simultaneously, or sequentially over a variable period of time. The aim
is to reconstruct like tissue with like tissue. To accomplish this, the surgeon must evaluate
the extent to which tissue is missing and identify potential donor sites or other solutions to
best manage skin and soft tissue defects.

Coverage of skin defects — Free skin grafts, either split-thickness or full-thickness, are the
conventional options for coverage of freshly excised burns, with the exception of the
smallest burn wounds, which may be closed directly, and burns exposing bone and tendons
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 4/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

devoid of a graftable vascularized layer, which generally require flap coverage [9]. Skin grafts
can only be used to cover exposed bone or tendon if there is a vascularized layer of
periosteum or if the paratenon (paratendon) is intact. Split-thickness skin grafting is likely to
form contractures and to lead to scar deformities. Honest discussion with patients helps to
prepare the ground for later revision and to avoid unexpected disappointment.

Coverage with autologous skin grafts is possible only when donor sites that can be safely
harvested are available. If autologous skin coverage is not possible due to the environment
of the wound (infection, potential for conversion to a deeper pattern of injury), the patient's
physiology (deterioration, instability), or paucity of donor sites, then temporary skin
coverage must be attempted. (See "Skin autografting", section on 'Skin anatomy and
definitions'.)

Allografts are characteristically the preferred next choice due to their adhesion, capacity for
dermal preservation, and temporary biocompatibility. If they are not available due to
financial constraints, personal choice, or unit protocols, xenografts provide another choice
for coverage, but of undoubtedly less quality and dermal advantage. At times, temporary
wound dressings or other alternatives (eg, skin substitutes) can be used until more definitive
reconstruction can be accomplished. (See "Skin substitutes", section on 'Available products'.)

Coverage of soft tissue defects and deep structures — Complex wounds in which the
volume of tissue loss is either too large or exposes deep structures (eg, vessels, nerves,
tendons, bone) are unsuitable for skin grafts and require ascending the reconstructive
ladder [10]. Flap reconstruction (local/distant flap with or without tissue expansion) is ideal, if
tissues are available. A complete evaluation assesses the skin, subcutaneous tissue, fascia,
muscle, blood vessels, nerves, cartilage, and bone. (See 'Flap reconstruction' below and
"Overview of flaps for soft tissue reconstruction", section on 'Principles of reconstruction'.)

BURN SCAR REVISION AND TIMING

The timing of burn scar revision can be regarded as urgent (immediate), essential (early),
and desirable (delayed) [11]. While definitive reconstruction of burn scars may be delayed
until full maturation of the scars is achieved or to let physiotherapy modulate the surgical
behavior, some burn scars require immediate reconstructive attention to restore function or
protect vital areas. In one retrospective cohort study, 13 percent of patients underwent
reconstructive surgery during the 10-year follow-up period [12]. The most common
indication was scar contracture, and the hands and head/neck were the anatomic regions
most frequently involved.

Physiotherapy and scar management techniques (eg, stretching, mobilization, exercise,

splinting, silicone sheeting, massaging, moisturizing, pressure garments) may alter the scar

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 5/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

sufficiently to make it functionally compatible and cosmetically acceptable, or to potentially

reduce the complexity, number, or timing of the reconstructive procedures. (See
"Hypertrophic scarring and keloids following burn injuries", section on 'Preventive strategies
and their efficacy'.)

Immediate — The priority in immediate (urgent) procedures is to protect anatomically

sensitive structures fundamental for full function and optimal quality of life. Immediate
procedures are restricted to burns for which there is no other suitable treatment, such as
providing coverage of exposed or severely damaged vital structures [11]. Immediate revision
should be performed following full healing of the acutely burned areas (in the best scenario,
grafts will heal in five days) but as soon as symptoms related to the exposure of vital
structures appear. Characteristically, these are performed prior to the period of full scar
maturation, in order to preserve function.

Examples include:

● Release of eyelid contracture to protect the cornea to avoid cicatricial ectropion

● Release of microstomia (severe contractures of the mouth)
● Release of compressed neurovascular bundles
● Release of synechial neck contractures that limit neck extension

Early — Early (essential) procedures are performed to improve the burn care rehabilitation
and nonvital function [11]. Early procedures are performed for mature burn scar
contractures that do not respond to splinting or aggressive physical therapy. Examples of
abnormal scarring areas that are amenable to early reconstruction include:

● Nonsynechial neck contractures

● Contractures of major joints (eg, elbow, knee, ankle)
● Contractures of areas that limit mobility (eg, axilla, groin)
● Contractures of the hand

Delayed — Most burn reconstructive procedures are performed as delayed (late/desirable)

procedures [11]. These procedures are performed after the scar has matured, typically 18
months to two years after full healing. Delayed procedures address the size and shape of the
mature scar as well as abnormalities in color and texture mismatched to the surrounding
skin. Functional reconstructive procedures should always be performed with the goal of the
best aesthetic result possible, thus providing dual benefits to the burned patient [13].
Examples of late reconstruction include:

● Reconstruction of passive areas (eg, trunk, extremities)

● Aesthetics (eg, face, breast)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 6/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

DIRECT WOUND CLOSURE

Direct wound closure is the simplest procedure that can be used for small to moderately
sized burn scars that are suitable for revision by excision, provided the wound edges can be
brought together without tension. Excess tension will lead to stretched, unsightly, and
painful scars. Although direct closure is primarily applicable to relatively small wounds,
larger wounds can be closed in areas with sufficiently redundant tissue or in areas where the
elasticity of the surrounding tissues allows for tension-free closure. As an example, a large
lower abdominal burn scar can be excised and closed with an abdominoplasty-type closure
providing excellent cosmetic outcomes.

The main advantage of direct closure is a theoretical improvement in aesthetic outcome by

transforming a functionally disabling or unsightly scar into a cosmetically acceptable line of
closure. This principle needs to be applied judiciously as overambitious and careless
planning may lead to large wounds not amenable to direct closure, potential dehiscence,
and other problems if the wound edges are close to or occupying joint lines. Small burn
wounds or scars that cross joint lines or involve areas close to the eyes, mouth, and nose can
be revised using local flap procedures (eg, Z-plasty). (See 'Flap reconstruction' below.)

SKIN GRAFTING

Split-thickness autografting — A split-thickness autograft includes the epidermis and

varying amounts of dermis. The general principles of skin grafting, including the advantages
and disadvantages of split-thickness skin grafts, surgical techniques, and general
postoperative care, are discussed separately. Our preferences for coverage of burn wounds
are provided below. (See "Skin autografting", section on 'Split-thickness skin grafting'.)

The split-thickness skin graft is the most frequently used donor tissue and is the workhorse
resurfacing technique in the management of acute burn wounds.

The primary limitations of skin grafting in the burn-injured patient are the frequent lack of
availability of unburned donor sites, the reduced elasticity and pliability of the donor skin,
and the tendency for scarring and contraction. When donor sites are limited, expansion of
the graft by meshing techniques ( picture 1), reharvesting, and combination with allograft
techniques (eg, sandwich technique) allows for coverage of larger defects. The quality,
elasticity, and pliability of the reconstruction can be improved by combining the split-
thickness skin graft with a skin (dermal) substitute. (See 'Use of skin substitutes' below.)

Characteristically, 1:1 mesh (mini mesh), 2:1 mesh, and 4:1 mesh (with overlying allograft)
are used depending on the availability of donor sites. The Meek technique is an alternative
technique for expanding autografts. (See "Skin autografting", section on 'Graft meshing'.)
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 7/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

Sheet grafts (unmeshed) provide optimal coverage for burns of the face and hands and
other anatomic sites where cosmesis and function are important, but their use also depends
upon the availability of unburned skin ( picture 2 and picture 3) [14-16].

Donor sites are chosen carefully with a mind toward the possibility of repeated harvesting.
Convex, easy-to-harvest areas such as the anterior and lateral surfaces of the thigh are
preferred split-thickness skin graft donor sites. When donor sites are plentiful, skin can be
taken from an inconspicuous location that is easily accessible for wound care. However, for
large surface area burns, every available site may need to be used. This may include the
scalp and scrotum area [17].

We do not harvest split-thickness skin grafts thicker than 12/1000 of an inch in the burn-
injured patient. Harvesting thicker grafts requires a longer time for donor sites to heal and
may preclude that site from repeat harvesting.

The primary dressing (in direct contact with the graft) should be nonadherent (eg, Telfa,
Mepitel). This greatly facilitates skin graft inspection and minimizes graft shearing. A
secondary dressing with antimicrobial properties (eg, povidone-iodine solution, silver-based
topical agents) is placed overlying the primary dressing. Tertiary dressings (bandages) that
control exudate and keep the patient's environment clean complete the dressing. Tie-over
bolsters are helpful for the fixation and immobility of the grafts. By applying a nonadherent
dressing and then tying over the secondary and tertiary dressings, grafts are secured when
other options such as simple bandaging may seem less useful. Application of negative
pressure wound devices in the immediate post-graft period helps secure graft take and
prepares the area for further splinting [18,19]. Grafts in high-range-of-motion areas (and
therefore with a great possibility of shear), such as in the axilla, elbow, or popliteal fossa,
need to be protected by splinting; however, graft protection and preservation needs to be
balanced with preserving the range of motion in joints. (See "Skin autografting", section on
'Graft placement and fixation'.)

Early graft inspection is recommended, especially in cosmetically sensitive areas, though the
protocol may vary according to the surgeon's preferences or level of experience. We
generally inspect the grafts and change the dressings every 48 hours with removal of staples
or other suture material at day 6. The aim of this close surveillance approach is early
detection of graft shearing, hematomas, seromas, or any other problem.

Care of the donor site is also fundamental, particularly if reharvesting may be necessary. A
wound contact layer dressing (eg, Mepitel) as a primary dressing has been a good option in
our practice, but the choice for the burn surgeon is vast. (See "Skin autografting", section on
'Donor site dressings and care'.)

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 8/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

Full-thickness autografting — A full-thickness autograft includes the entire thickness of

skin, both epidermis and dermis. The donor site is closed primarily. The general principles of
skin grafting, including the advantages and disadvantages of full-thickness skin grafts,
surgical techniques, and general postoperative care, are discussed separately. (See "Skin
autografting", section on 'Full-thickness skin grafting'.)

Full-thickness skin grafts are used in areas of special anatomic and functional importance
(eg, head, eyelids, perioral areas, neck, and hands) [20]. (See "Principles of burn
reconstruction: Face, scalp, and neck" and "Primary operative management of hand burns".)

Full-thickness skin grafts provide better-appearing texture, pliability, elasticity, and color
match and contract less compared with split-thickness skin grafts [20,21]. However,
particularly in burn-injured patients, the availability of sites for harvesting full-thickness skin
grafts may be limited. (See "Skin autografting", section on 'Donor site selection'.)

Similar with split-thickness skin grafts, bolstering and tie-over of the grafts may help in
protecting the grafted areas, though their usefulness in applying pressure in the interface
between recipient and graft area to ensure better take has been questioned [22]. Negative
pressure wound therapy is another fixation option in selected patients. The graft is best
serviced by an early check to ensure graft take. (See "Skin autografting", section on 'Graft
placement and fixation'.)

Use of skin substitutes — The use of skin substitutes (single layer, bilayer) has increased
the number of reconstructive options for burn surgeons. In the treatment of burns, skin
substitutes are primarily used to treat full-thickness skin defects but can also be used to
cover skin defects that may result following release of post-burn contractures [23]. In
addition, the quality, elasticity, and pliability of split-skin grafts can be improved by
supplementing them with a skin (dermal) substitute, which adds a dermal component to the
reconstruction [24]. (See 'Split-thickness autografting' above and "Skin substitutes".)

If there is not enough donor site skin to provide coverage, or if the wound bed is not primed
for autologous coverage, then the wound is debrided, and tissue samples and wound swabs
are sent for microbiology. If there is no evidence for burn wound infection, the burn wound
can be covered with the skin substitute, typically an allograft. Dressings are placed and
changed routinely. Adhesion to the wound bed is inspected every 48 hours with removal of
staples at the third dressing change (six days after coverage). If the wound environment is
not optimized or there is lack of adhesion, excessive incorporation, or rejection, the allograft
will need to be removed after 10 to 14 days and substituted by a fresh one. Otherwise, the
primed wound bed can be autografted.

In our practice, we have used Integra and Matriderm in the management of burn wounds.
Our use of Integra has also included acute coverage of full-thickness burns and coverage of

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sear… 9/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

exposed deep structures. In two trials identified in a systematic review, treated burns had a
significantly faster time to healing (11 versus 14 days) compared with autografts, other
allografts, or xenografts, but a significantly lower proportion of patients with ≥75 percent of
wound closure [25]. We have found Integra to be more useful for reconstructive indications
rather than coverage in the acute period, primarily because of failure due to infection [26].
As an example, in a prospective multicenter trial that included 216 burn patients, the
incidence of superficial wound infection at Integra-treated sites was 13 percent, and invasive
infection occurred in 3 percent [27]. Matriderm is a highly porous dermal scaffold that can
be used to resurface a burn wound without theoretical loss in pliability and elasticity [28].
However, in a prospective study of 42 paired burn wounds and 44 paired scar
reconstructions, in spite of short-term benefits, there was no evidence for long-term clinical
effectiveness among burn patients [28,29].

TISSUE EXPANSION

Tissue expansion is a technique that gradually stretches an area of pliable skin (taking
advantage of the principles of creep and stress relaxation) in preparation for its use as
coverage of a burn defect or area of contracture release [30,31]. Tissue expansion
techniques are used in the reconstructive stage of scar management when the wounds are
fully healed and the scars resulting from the original burn injury need to be addressed.

Tissue expansion provides tissue that best matches the affected skin in terms of function
and cosmetic appearance (color, consistency, elasticity, pliability, presence of hair, and
sensation) [32,33]. However, suitable tissue neighboring the burned region must be
available. Expanded free flaps are another effective option to cover larger wounds [11].

Tissue expansion has been used in multiple anatomic areas and is particularly useful in head
and neck reconstruction [32-34]. Indications for tissue expansion include:

● Limited availability of tissue for reconstruction

● Reconstruction of specialized hair-bearing areas (eg, scalp)
● Reconstruction of sensitive cosmetic areas (eg, head and neck, breast)
● Reconstruction of sites requiring skin match for color, thickness, and/or texture

The procedure is performed in stages. The first procedure creates a pocket in a

subcutaneous plane (subgaleal in the scalp) in which to insert the expander. Expansion
requires repeated injections of saline into the expander's port. A later generation of self-
inflating osmotic expanders eliminates the need for repeated injections and may potentially
reduce infection and other complications [35]. Expansion is started once the burn wounds
are healed and stopped once enough of the expander has achieved the desired volume.
Temporary cessation of expansion may be needed it there is excessive pain or blanching of

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 10/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

the expanded skin. A second procedure removes the expander and advances, rotates, or
transposes the expanded tissue into the defect, and the wounds are closed.

Complications related to tissue expansion include infection, extrusion of the implant, loss of
use of the saline port, or expansion flap necrosis (before or after the second stage of the
procedure). A 10-year review of tissue expansion procedures used in 82 burn patients
identified complications in 22 percent of the procedures [36]. The most frequent
complications were expander exposure (50 percent), infection (24 percent), and malfunction
of the expander (13 percent). A retrospective analysis of 102 tissue expanders in 57 burn
patients reported major and minor complications in 9.8 and 18.6 percent of procedures,
respectively [37]. The total failure rate was 7.8 percent (8/102 procedures) and was highest at
the head (20 percent) and with higher volumes of expander (400 and 800 mL).

Complications can be minimized with optimal choice of expander and proper surgical and
expansion technique [38]. (See "Overview of flaps for soft tissue reconstruction".)

FLAP RECONSTRUCTION

Flaps represent the gold standard of reconstruction by providing like tissue for like tissue in
burn wound defects. The obvious limitation to their use in the burn patient is the availability
of healthy, pliable, well-vascularized tissue. The selection of a reconstructive option is based
on the relative importance of replacing each component of the defect [39]. Careful design of
flaps, taking into consideration the frequent presence of scarred tissue around the defect, is
fundamental. The types and classification of flaps used for reconstruction are reviewed
separately. (See "Overview of flaps for soft tissue reconstruction".)

Small contractures or defects can be approached with flaps based on the Z principle [40-44]
(see "Z-plasty"). These local flap techniques are especially useful in the release of burn
contractures that distort anatomic structures (eg, eyelid), functionally important joints (eg,
axilla), and web space contractures or other more complicated anatomic sites [43]. Other
options for local flap usage include the propeller flap reconstruction (eg, elbow contracture)
and bilobed transposition (eg, axilla, neck contracture) [44-46]. When needed, local skin flaps
that include previously burned reconstructed skin can be used [47]. In a retrospective review
of 238 local skin flaps harvested from previously burned and grafted sites, there was no
difference in complication rates compared to 115 sites of unburned donor flaps [47].

Burn reconstruction has benefited from the improved understanding of the blood supply of
the skin at the angiosome for the creation of pedicled and free flaps. Once a contracture or
scar has been released or the defect to be reconstructed has been defined, the flap choice is
established based on criteria of availability of tissue, successful and reliable pedicle location,
and adequate match in texture and color. The blood supply to the flap must be intact and

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 11/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

unaffected by the burn injury. (See "Overview of flaps for soft tissue reconstruction", section
on 'Principles of reconstruction'.)

Free flaps require much planning and surgical expertise and are outstanding reconstructive
options when successful, but they can also be causes of severe morbidity if vascular
complications lead to partial or complete flap necrosis. The patient needs to be optimized to
withstand a potentially lengthy surgery. An advantage of perforator flaps (a type of free flap)
for burn reconstruction is that a large cutaneous flap can be obtained from the same region
of a conventional musculocutaneous flap without the need to include the muscle, which
might not be expendable, though it is important to exclude the possibility that the
subdermal plexus and/or main perforator has been affected by the burn injury. Appropriate
mapping of perforators, selection, and careful dissection helps to prevent complications
associated with perforator flaps [48,49].

In our practice, we have found that free flaps have a small but definite role in burn
reconstruction. Only approximately 1 percent of surgically treated burns will require a free
flap [50]. We use a free flap in the following situations:

● When less complex reconstructive methods (eg, skin grafting) have failed.

● When deep structures (eg, calvarium, frontal sinus, nasal pyramid, tibial crest,
neurovascular structures, tendons) are exposed.

● When there is an absolute need to combine reconstruction with cosmetic appearance,

such as with the facial structures or the female breast.

● Unsalvageable deep burns.

● Resurfacing following release of scar contractures.

While extensive burns limit tissue availability for accessible donor sites, an area that includes
acutely burned donor skin can be harvested successfully as flap coverage for another
burned site [51,52]. Further studies to evaluate the survival of free flaps created from burned
donor sites should be performed before any definitive statement can be made regarding the
safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Despite their complexity, advocates support their use because free flaps help preserve
exposed deep structures and are a source of well-vascularized, pliable tissue that can be
used to correct contracted burn scars [49]. In a review of 53 free flap reconstruction
procedures for otherwise unsalvageable burn injuries or contracted burn scars, 50 patients
(94 percent) had a successful outcome with a good aesthetic and functional result [53]. In a
retrospective review of 38 free fasciocutaneous flaps used to reconstruct hand burns, all
flaps survived at least in part, and three flaps experienced partial skin loss due to infection

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 12/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

and were later skin grafted [54]. (See "Overview of flaps for soft tissue reconstruction",
section on 'Free tissue transfer'.)

Timing of free flap reconstruction and type of burn injury may be important to the success
rate of the free flap. In a review of 75 free flaps in 60 severely burned patients, the overall
flap failure rate was 13 percent [55]. Eight of the 10 flap failures occurred in the group that
was reconstructed between 5 and 21 days post-burn. None of the free flaps failed when the
procedure was performed immediately (within five days) or as a secondary reconstructive
procedure six or more weeks post-burn. The free flap survival rate was lower in the electrical
high-voltage group (81 percent) compared with the burn injury group (90 percent). However,
during the critical time period between 5 and 21 days, the survival rate for the flaps in the
high-voltage group was higher (44 percent) compared with the burn injury group (25
percent).

SOCIETY GUIDELINE LINKS

Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Care of the patient
with burn injury".)

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

● Burn wounds present many challenges for the reconstructive surgeon. The immediate
goal of reconstructive surgery is to restore function. Appropriate measures are taken to
limit scarring, but burn wounds may require later revision to achieve an optimal
cosmetic outcome. (See 'Introduction' above.)

● Split-thickness skin grafts are versatile and are used to reconstruct large burn wound
areas and to provide coverage for donor flap sites. When donor sites are limited,
expansion of split-thickness skin grafts using meshing techniques and reharvesting
healed donor sites allows for coverage of large surface area burns. Full-thickness skin
grafts provide a more satisfactory aesthetic appearance due to their pliability and are
used in areas of special anatomic and functional importance. If autologous skin
coverage is not possible, temporary skin coverage must be attempted. During recovery,
a balance must be achieved between immobilization to allow for skin grafts or tissue
flaps to heal and mobilization to restore function. (See 'Coverage of skin defects' above
and 'Skin grafting' above.)

● The use of skin substitutes has increased the number of reconstructive options for burn
surgeons. In addition, the quality, elasticity, and pliability of split-skin grafts can be

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 13/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

improved by supplementing them with a skin (dermal) substitute, which adds a dermal
component to the reconstruction. (See 'Use of skin substitutes' above and "Skin
autografting".)

● Wounds for which the volume of tissue loss is either too large or exposes deep
structures are unsuitable for skin grafts and require more complex reconstruction. Flap
reconstruction (local/distant with or without tissue expansion) is ideal, if tissues are
available. While extensive burns limit tissue availability of donor sites, an area that
includes acutely burned donor skin can be harvested successfully as flap coverage for
another burned site. (See 'Tissue expansion' above and 'Flap reconstruction' above.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement.

REFERENCES
1. Xiao-Wu W, Herndon DN, Spies M, et al. Effects of delayed wound excision and grafting
in severely burned children. Arch Surg 2002; 137:1049.

2. Kennedy P, Brammah S, Wills E. Burns, biofilm and a new appraisal of burn wound
sepsis. Burns 2010; 36:49.

3. Herndon DN, Tompkins RG. Support of the metabolic response to burn injury. Lancet
2004; 363:1895.

4. Hart DW, Wolf SE, Mlcak R, et al. Persistence of muscle catabolism after severe burn.
Surgery 2000; 128:312.

5. Ong YS, Samuel M, Song C. Meta-analysis of early excision of burns. Burns 2006;
32:145.

6. Munster AM, Smith-Meek M, Sharkey P. The effect of early surgical intervention on

mortality and cost-effectiveness in burn care, 1978-91. Burns 1994; 20:61.

7. Atiyeh BS, Dham R, Kadry M, et al. Benefit-cost analysis of moist exposed burn
ointment. Burns 2002; 28:659.

8. Ramzy PI, Barret JP, Herndon DN. Thermal injury. Crit Care Clin 1999; 15:333.

9. Huang, T. Overview of burn reconstruction. In: Total Burn Care, 3rd editon, Herndon, D
(Eds), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 2007. p.674.

10. Parrett BM, Pomahac B, Demling RH, Orgill DP. Fourth-degree burns to the lower
extremity with exposed tendon and bone: a ten-year experience. J Burn Care Res 2006;

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 14/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

27:34.

11. Barret JP. Burns reconstruction. BMJ 2004; 329:274.

12. Hop MJ, Langenberg LC, Hiddingh J, et al. Reconstructive surgery after burns: a 10-year
follow-up study. Burns 2014; 40:1544.

13. Shelley OP, Van Niekerk W, Cuccia G, Watson SB. Dual benefit procedures: combining
aesthetic surgery with burn reconstruction. Burns 2006; 32:1022.

14. Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg
1985; 76:239.

15. GONZALEZ-ULLOA M, CASTILLO A, STEVENS E, et al. Preliminary study of the total

restoration of the facial skin. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1954; 13:151.

16. Archer SB, Henke A, Greenhalgh DG, Warden GD. The use of sheet autografts to cover
extensive burns in patients. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998; 19:33.

17. Mackie IP, Greenwood J. A simple technique to facilitate tumescence in burn eschar and
donor sites. J Burn Care Res 2009; 30:906.

18. Chang KP, Tsai CC, Lin TM, et al. An alternative dressing for skin graft immobilization:
negative pressure dressing. Burns 2001; 27:839.

19. Moisidis E, Heath T, Boorer C, et al. A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled

clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;
114:917.

20. Iwuagwu FC, Wilson D, Bailie F. The use of skin grafts in postburn contracture release: a
10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103:1198.

21. Celiköz B, Deveci M, Duman H, Nşanci M. Recontruction of facial defects and burn scars
using large size freehand full-thickness skin graft from lateral thoracic region. Burns
2001; 27:174.

22. Seymour FK, Giele HP. Tie-overs under pressure. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56:494.

23. Figus A, Leon-Villapalos J, Philp B, Dziewulski P. Severe multiple extensive postburn

contractures: a simultaneous approach with total scar tissue excision and resurfacing
with dermal regeneration template. J Burn Care Res 2007; 28:913.

24. van der Veen VC, van der Wal MB, van Leeuwen MC, et al. Biological background of
dermal substitutes. Burns 2010; 36:305.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 15/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

25. Pham C, Greenwood J, Cleland H, et al. Bioengineered skin substitutes for the
management of burns: a systematic review. Burns 2007; 33:946.

26. Jeng JC, Fidler PE, Sokolich JC, et al. Seven years' experience with Integra as a
reconstructive tool. J Burn Care Res 2007; 28:120.

27. Heimbach DM, Warden GD, Luterman A, et al. Multicenter postapproval clinical trial of
Integra dermal regeneration template for burn treatment. J Burn Care Rehabil 2003;
24:42.

28. Ryssel H, Gazyakan E, Germann G, Ohlbauer M. The use of MatriDerm in early excision
and simultaneous autologous skin grafting in burns--a pilot study. Burns 2008; 34:93.

29. van Zuijlen PP, Vloemans JF, van Trier AJ, et al. Dermal substitution in acute burns and
reconstructive surgery: a subjective and objective long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr
Surg 2001; 108:1938.

30. Gil T, Metanes I, Aman B, et al. Six tissue expansion sessions of the scalp for
reconstruction of post-burn alopecia. J Burn Care Res 2008; 29:390.

31. Di Mascio D, Castagnetti F, Mazzeo F, et al. Overexpansion technique in burn scar

management. Burns 2006; 32:490.

32. Motamed S, Niazi F, Atarian S, Motamed A. Post-burn head and neck reconstruction
using tissue expanders. Burns 2008; 34:878.

33. Tavares Filho JM, Belerique M, Franco D, et al. Tissue expansion in burn sequelae repair.
Burns 2007; 33:246.

34. De Agustin JC, Morris SF, Zuker RM. Tissue expansion in pediatric burn reconstruction. J
Burn Care Rehabil 1993; 14:43.

35. Chummun S, Addison P, Stewart KJ. The osmotic tissue expander: a 5-year experience. J
Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63:2128.

36. Cunha MS, Nakamoto HA, Herson MR, et al. Tissue expander complications in plastic
surgery: a 10-year experience. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2002; 57:93.

37. Bozkurt A, Groger A, O'Dey D, et al. Retrospective analysis of tissue expansion in

reconstructive burn surgery: evaluation of complication rates. Burns 2008; 34:1113.

38. Hudson DA, Grob M. Optimising results with tissue expansion: 10 simple rules for
successful tissue expander insertion. Burns 2005; 31:1.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 16/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

39. Mathes, SJ, Nahai, F.. The reconstructive triangle: A paradigm for decision making.. In: R
econstructive surgery: Principles, anatomy and technique, New York 1997. p.9.

40. Murakami M, Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R. The scar band rotation flap. Burns 2005; 31:220.

41. Gokrem S, Baser NT, Akbuga UB, et al. Nine-flap z-plasty: a new modification of five-flap
z-plasty. Burns 2008; 34:292.

42. Coban YK. Moderate axillary postburn contracture release using the VM-plasty. Burns
2007; 33:133.

43. Schwarz RJ. Management of postburn contractures of the upper extremity. J Burn Care
Res 2007; 28:212.

44. Aslan G, Tuncali D, Cigsar B, et al. The propeller flap for postburn elbow contractures.
Burns 2006; 32:112.

45. Karacalar A, Güner H. The axial bilobed flap for burn contractures of the axilla. Burns
2000; 26:628.

46. Laredo Ortiz C, Valverde Carrasco A, Novo Torres A, et al. Supraclavicular bilobed
fasciocutaneous flap for postburn cervical contractures. Burns 2007; 33:770.

47. Barret JP, Herndon DN, McCauley RL. Use of previously burned skin as random
cutaneous local flaps in pediatric burn reconstruction. Burns 2002; 28:500.

48. Hallock GG. A history of the development of muscle perforator flaps and their specific
use in burn reconstruction. J Burn Care Rehabil 2004; 25:366.

49. Blondeel PN, Neligan, PC. Complications: Avoidance and treatment. In: Perforator Flap
s. Anatomy, Technique and Clinical applications, Blondeel, PN, Morris SF, Hallock, GG, N
eligan, PC (Eds), Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis 2006. p.115.

50. Platt AJ, McKiernan MV, McLean NR. Free tissue transfer in the management of burns.
Burns 1996; 22:474.

51. Akyürek M, Safak T. Transfer of a free flap from an acutely burned donor site. Scand J
Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004; 38:370.

52. Koul AR, Patil RK, Philip VK. Early use of microvascular free tissue transfer in the
management of electrical injuries. Burns 2008; 34:681.

53. De Lorenzi F, van der Hulst R, Boeckx W. Free flaps in burn reconstruction. Burns 2001;
27:603.

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 17/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

54. Pan CH, Chuang SS, Yang JY. Thirty-eight free fasciocutaneous flap transfers in acute
burned-hand injuries. Burns 2007; 33:230.

55. Baumeister S, Köller M, Dragu A, et al. Principles of microvascular reconstruction in

burn and electrical burn injuries. Burns 2005; 31:92.

Topic 14990 Version 15.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 18/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

GRAPHICS

Harvested split-thickness skin graft, meshed

The split-thickness skin graft has been meshed. Note the apertures for tissue
expansion.

Courtesy of Jorge Leon-Villapalos, MD, FRCS.

Graphic 77019 Version 2.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 19/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

Split-thickness skin graft and skin mesher

A split-thickness skin graft is processed through a skin mesher that creates apertures
in the graft. This allows for expansion and coverage of a greater wound surface area.

Courtesy of Jorge Leon-Villapalos, MD, FRCS.

Graphic 57087 Version 2.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 20/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

Split-thickness skin graft meshing process

The split-thickness skin graft is processed through the skin mesher. Note the apertures
for graft expansion as the skin exits the mesher.

Courtesy of Jorge Leon-Villapalos, MD, FRCS.

Graphic 63714 Version 2.0

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 21/22
11/14/2020 Overview of surgical procedures used in the management of burn injuries - UpToDate

Contributor Disclosures
Jorge Leon-Villapalos, MD, FRCS Nothing to disclose Peter Dziewulski, MD, FRCS Nothing to
disclose Marc G Jeschke, MD, PhD Nothing to disclose Charles E Butler, MD,
FACS Consultant/Advisory Boards: ECM Biosurgery [Abdominal wall reconstruction]; Tela Bio
[Abdominal wall & breast reconstruction]. Kathryn A Collins, MD, PhD, FACS Nothing to disclose

Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these
are addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for
references to be provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all
authors and must conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.

Conflict of interest policy

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-surgical-procedures-used-in-the-management-of-burn-injuries/print?search=burns&source=sea… 22/22