Literacy Training Service II: Detailed Teaching Syllabus (DTS) and Instructors Guide (Ig'S)
Literacy Training Service II: Detailed Teaching Syllabus (DTS) and Instructors Guide (Ig'S)
PHILOSOPHY
The PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY is committed to the pursuit of excellence relative to student’s professional growth and development.
VISION
PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY envisions producing quality graduates fully equipped with knowledge, attitudes, values, and skills and who are globally
competitive in their chosen profession ever ready to render quality services.
MISSION STATEMENT
PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY provides quality education to every student through a well-balanced research oriented learning environment that
develops critical and creative thinking for maximum development of individual’s talents and capabilities.
INSTITUTIONAL OBJECTIVES
In pursuit of its Vision and Mission, PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY will achieve the following:
1. Provide programs and activities that will enhance the development of the students physically, intellectually, culturally, emotionally, socially, spiritually and
morally.
2. Provide college education opportunities to poor but deserving students through the PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY scholarship grants.
3. Train students with globally competitive technical skills that will make them competent and capable of handling challenges in life.
4. Provide manpower needs of the country with professionally qualified graduates imbued with dignity and high moral values who are mature, productive, self-
reliant, responsible and self-disciplined citizens.
SPECIAL OBJECTIVES
To provide the country with globally competitive and professionally licensed graduates as integral part of the total manpower needed for the economic development in the
national and international levels.
CORE VALUES
P Professionalism
H High Spirituality
I Integrity
L Love of Humanity
C Compassionate and Competent
S Solidarity
T Transformative
Issue Date June, 2018 Prepared by: Reviewed by: Recommended by: Approved by:
________________________ __________________________ __________________________ __________________________
Revision Status 3 College of Computer Studies Rachelle N. Noble, MIT Engr. Charo G. Almonte, MIT Engr. Raul B. Gironella, DMin
Revision Date June, 2018 Instructor Department Head College Dean VP for Academic Affairs/QAM
Page | 1 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
COLLEGE OF COMPUTER STUDIES
MISSION STATEMENT
In line with the Philippine College of Science and Technology Vision, Mission, and Objectives, the College of Computer Studies is strongly committed to direct and operate its
program through the following objectives.
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
To produce globally competitive Computer Science and Information Technology graduates with quality professional skills and competencies that are imbued with high moral
character in the practice of the profession within national and international standards.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
The above goal will be achieved through the following specific objectives:
1. To enhance the training of the students on the theoretical skills in computer science and information technology.
2. To provide the students with adequate knowledge and technical skills in the conduct of research oriented application of theories and principles in dealing with laboratory
problems and exercises, computer system and design, program software and projects.
3. To equip students with social awareness and concern with a high sense of responsibility in the conduct of research and adoption of current and new technology to render
quality services.
INSTITUTIONAL OUTCOMES
A graduate of Philippine College of Science and Technology should:
1. Exercise leadership in the practice of the profession;
2. Demonstrate professional and social responsibilities;
3. Pursue lifelong learning for continuous development; and
4. Possesses creativity and critical thinking skills to become globally competitive guided with values of integrity and honesty
Page | 2 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
COURSE CODE : NSTP2
COURSE DESCRIPTIVE TITLE : Literacy Training Service II PREREQUISITE : None
LECTURE CONTACT LABORATORY CONTACT
COURSE CREDITS : 3 Unit : 3 hours : 0 hours
HOURS / WEEK HOURS / WEEK
Literacy Training Service 2 is the second part of Literacy Training Service (LTS) as a program component of the National Service
COURSE DESCRIPTION : Training Program. It is a one semester with 1.5 units course which immerse students in actual teaching of literacy and numeracy
skills to children, to the out-of-school youth (OSY), and other segment of the society needing such kind of service.
After completion of the course, the student should be able to:
1. Identify the problems and issues of the community;
2. Discuss the principle of learning and importance of using conditions in teaching proper;
COURSE OUTCOME/S : 3. Manifest interest through participation in community development;
4. Demonstrate the application of certain application methods, techniques, and strategies of teaching; and
5. Conduct literacy and numeracy training in the community.
1. Republic Act No. 9163 An Act Establishing The National Service Training Program (NSTP) For Tertiary Level Students, Amending
REFERENCE/S :
For The Purpose Republic Act No. 7077 And Presidential Decree No. 1706, And For Other Purposes
COURSE SYLLABUS
LEARNING OUTCOMES TEACHING / LEARNING REFERENCES /
ASSESSMENT (METHOD/TASK)
(LO’s) TOPICS ACTIVITIES EQUIPMENT / MATERIALS
(AT’s)
(TLA’s) USED
State the objectives, activities, and Orientation; discussion Prelim Recitation #1A Literacy Training
requirements of the course. of course goals and which will cover topics Service I Detailed
expected outcomes; discussed in the Teaching Syllabus
discussion of course orientation. and Instructional
policies, grading system Guide; Student
Handbook
Define Learning and explain 1. PRINCIPLES OF Discussion about the Preliminary Recitation #1B Quilang, Alexander,
the concept of it LEARNING definition, characteristics of The principles of learning et.al. Workbook in NSTP
Discuss the Principles of 2. LEARNING DEFINED learning and the principles of Preliminary Assignment #1 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
Learning 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF learning. Theories of Learning Publications. 2012
LEARNING Group dynamics on the Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
different principles of CWTS II / LTS II:
learning. Resource Logbook. C &
Role playing regarding the E Publishing, Inc. 2006
different principles of Delos Santos, Andres,
Page | 3 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
learning. et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Delos Santos, Andres,
et. al. NSTP: National
Service Training
Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
Discuss the differences in 1. Principles of Learning Discussion on the different Prelim Quiz #1 Learning, its Quilang, Alexander,
Learning Theories, the 2. Fundamental Laws / theories on learning Principles and Theories et.al. Workbook in NSTP
assumptions underlying their Theories of Learning Video presentation on the Prelim Recitation #1C 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
differences, and the ways 3. Conditions which different theories on Conditions which facilitate Publications. 2012
these assumptions shape facilitate learning learning. learning Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
instructional planning. 4. 5. Psychology of Group dynamics that will Prelim Quiz #2 Psychology CWTS II / LTS II:
Explain the significance of Learners interpret the different of Learners Resource Logbook. C &
Learning Theories when conditions of learning based Check – Up Examinations E Publishing, Inc. 2006
applied to instruction on their observations. will cover topics from the Delos Santos, Andres,
Describe the different Role playing on the different Principles of Learning until et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
psychology of learners theories of learning. Psychology of Learners JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Delos Santos, Andres,
et. al. NSTP: National
Service Training
Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
Discuss the process of 1. Principle of Learning Discussion on the process of Prelim Assignment #2 Quilang, Alexander,
teaching and explain the 2. Teaching Process teaching and explain why Process of Teaching (steps) et.al. Workbook in NSTP
perspective which considers 3. Teaching Strategies / teaching is both an art and a Prelim Quiz #3 Teaching 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
teaching both as an art and Method science. Strategies and Methods Publications. 2012
science 4. Inductive Method Demonstration of the Prelim Recitation #1D Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
Page | 4 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
Enumerate the different 5. Deductive Method different strategies and Different Teaching CWTS II / LTS II:
strategies / method of 6. Teaching Techniques methods of teaching Techniques Resource Logbook. C &
teaching Dramatization Discussion on the different E Publishing, Inc. 2006
Differentiate the Inductive teaching strategy and the Delos Santos, Andres,
Method from the Deductive differences between et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
Method Inductive and Deductive JIMCZYVILLE
Explain the different Method Publications. 2014
techniques used in teaching Demonstration of the Delos Santos, Andres,
different teaching technique et. al. NSTP: National
Service Training
Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
Discuss the process of I. Planning Lessons Discussion on lesson Prelim Quiz #4 A short quiz Quilang, Alexander,
teaching and explain the 1. The Lesson Plan planning. on the parts of a lesson et.al. Workbook in NSTP
perspective which considers 2. Importance of a Lesson Demonstration on how to plan and kinds of lesson 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
teaching both as an art and Plan make a lesson plan including plan Publications. 2012
science 3. Parts of a Lesson Plan its essential parts Prelim Quiz #5 Each group Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
Enumerate the different 4. Kinds of Lesson Plan The students will construct will make their own lesson CWTS II / LTS II:
strategies / method of their own lesson plan plan (computer encoded) Resource Logbook. C &
teaching Preliminary Examination E Publishing, Inc. 2006
Differentiate the Inductive will cover topics from Delos Santos, Andres,
Method from the Deductive Teaching Process up to et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
Method Kinds of Lesson Plan JIMCZYVILLE
Explain the different Publications. 2014
techniques used in teaching Delos Santos, Andres,
et. al. NSTP: National
Service Training
Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
State the kinds of II. Importance of Discussion about the Midterm Recitation #1 Quilang, Alexander,
Page | 5 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
instructional materials / aids Instructional Materials significance of instructional Significance of Instructional et.al. Workbook in NSTP
Explain the values and uses of 1. Classify the kinds of materials Materials 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
instructional materials in instructional materials Each students will describe Midterm Assignment #1 Publications. 2012
classroom teaching 2. Illustrate the use of the different instructional Observed other teachers Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
Prepare and demonstrate the different teaching aids materials that they usually and list down things that CWTS II / LTS II:
use of various instructional observe these teachers use during Resource Logbook. C &
materials in the teaching of a Each students will illustrate discussion. E Publishing, Inc. 2006
particular subject area their own teaching aids Midterm Quiz #1 A short Delos Santos, Andres,
quiz on the kinds of et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
instructional materials JIMCZYVILLE
Midterm Assignment #2: Publications. 2014
Submission of a typical Delos Santos, Andres,
example of a teaching aids. et. al. NSTP: National
Midterm Quiz #2 A short Service Training
quiz on the use of different Program. JIMCZYVILLE
teaching aids Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
Explain the process of Group III. Preparation of Plan for Discussion on how to Midterm Assignment #3: Quilang, Alexander,
Planning for the Project Literacy Training prepare a project proposal Submission of a sample et.al. Workbook in NSTP
Proposal Program for the Literacy Training Project Proposal for the 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
1. Teaching Program Literacy Program of the Publications. 2012
Demonstration The students will form a Out-of-School Youth (OSY) Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
group and make their own Midterm Quiz #3 Project CWTS II / LTS II:
Project Proposal Proposal for the Literacy Resource Logbook. C &
Each group of students will Program for the out-of- E Publishing, Inc. 2006
perform a teaching demo school youth (OSY) Delos Santos, Andres,
Midterm Quiz #4 Group et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
Activity: Teaching Demo JIMCZYVILLE
Midterm Examination Publications. 2014
which will cover topics from Delos Santos, Andres,
Importance of Instructional et. al. NSTP: National
Materials up to Group Service Training
Planning Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Page | 6 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
Execution of the actual IV. Coordinate with the The students will coordinate Final Quiz #1 Initial Quilang, Alexander,
Literacy Program for the Out- Barangay Officials of with the Barangay Official for evaluation on their et.al. Workbook in NSTP
of-School Youth the School’s Adopted the schedule of the Literacy performance as a student – 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
Participation in the Literacy Community Program teacher Publications. 2012
Program for the Out-of-School 1. Project The students, as a group, will Final Quiz #2 Evaluation on Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
Youth Implementation actively participate in the their performance as a CWTS II / LTS II:
Evaluation of the group’s activities based from the group Resource Logbook. C &
performance lesson plan Final Assignment #1 E Publishing, Inc. 2006
Documentation of the Delos Santos, Andres,
Preliminary Visit. et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
Semi – Final Exam A JIMCZYVILLE
composition writing of Publications. 2014
their Individual Teaching Delos Santos, Andres,
Experience et. al. NSTP: National
Service Training
Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
Produce a Documentation V. Post – Program Evaluation of the group’s Final Recitation #1 Forum Quilang, Alexander,
Report on the Group’s Implementation output and performance on the issues encountered et.al. Workbook in NSTP
Literacy Program Assessment An open forum regarding the during the Literacy Program 2. JIMYCZYVILLE
1. Project Documentation accomplished Literacy Final Assignment #2: Publications. 2012
Program Documentation of the 2nd Lee, Sergio J. NSTP II /
The students will modify Visit CWTS II / LTS II:
corrections or suggestions Final Quiz #3 Submit a Resource Logbook. C &
from the instructor finished and compiled E Publishing, Inc. 2006
Submission of a book bind of documentation of the Delos Santos, Andres,
compiled documentation of group’s Literacy Program et. al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
their Literacy Program experience JIMCZYVILLE
Final Assignment #3: Publications. 2014
Documentation of the Final Delos Santos, Andres,
Visit et. al. NSTP: National
Final Exam will cover topics Service Training
from the Preliminary Period Program. JIMCZYVILLE
Page | 7 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
up to the Final Period Publications. 2014
(multiple choice) Quilang, Alexander,
et.al. NSTP-CWTS-LTS.
JIMYCZYVILLE
Publications. 2014
Board marker, eraser,
and LCD projector
The final course grade will be computed according to the following formula:
1. The passing standard shall be the grade of 50%. To get the percentile grade, the number of correct answers called raw score shall be divided by the total number of
test points and multiplied by 100. Percentage (%) is used in determining and expressing a student’s raw scores in all assessments. The table below shows a sample
of the range of percentage marks and their corresponding equivalents.
2. The five point grading scale is use to indicate the result of the assessment as shown below.
PERCENTAGE GRADE LETTER GRADE DESCRIPTIVE RATING FIVE POINT GRADING REMARKS
90% – 100% A Excellent 1.0 Meets minimum competence with exceptional score
80% – 89% B Very Good 1.5 Meets minimum competence with over and above average score
70% – 79% C Good 2.0 Meets minimum competence with above average score
60% – 69% D Satisfactory 2.5 Meets minimum competence with average score
50% – 59% E Passed 3.0 Meets minimum competence
0% – 49% F Failed 5.0 Does not meet the minimum competence
Page | 8 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSITIG#12LTS2 APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT