SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT
SHARDA UNIVERSITY
(SCHOOL OF LAW)
INTERN AT
Saket Court complex , New Delhi
Jagat singh Baasta
Advocate On Record
Saket District Court Complex
Submitted To : Submitted By:
Assistant Professor:
Sahejh Singh
MR. ROHIN KOUL
(2019003352)
BA LLB – B
Semester V
DECLARATION
This declaration is made regarding the internship report which has been prepared and
drafted by Sahejh Singh under the supervision of Adv. JAGAT SINGH BAASTA,
Advocate On Record at Saket district court complex , Chamber No.103**, Saket
district court complex , Delhi-110017. It contains the work accomplished during the
internship which was assigned during the internship. This work was done in respect of
the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree of LL.B.
This internship report has not been submitted either in whole or in part to any other Law
University recognized by the Bar Council of India for the award of any law degree or
diploma within the territory of India.
Sahejh Singh Dated: 20th June, 2021
(2019003352)
BA LLB - B
Year-III,
Semester V
Sharda University, SOL
Greater Noida
Page | 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
At the outset, I would like to thank God for his blessings and benevolently granting me
vigor and audacity to complete my internship successfully. Before submitting my
detailed report/dirary on internship, I find an opportunity to place on record my warm
gratitude towards Mr. Rohin Koul sir, Assistant Professor, Sharda University, SOL
our respected teacher to encourage us towards Internship and how to perform our duty
under Internship. I would like to place my warm gratitude towards Adv. Jagat Singh
Baasta (A.O.R) under whom, I completed my internship and I gained a detailed and
useful experience for the purpose of Internship as well as for profession of advocacy in
near future. This is to express gratitude towards a person who guided and motivated me
throughout my internship period. It gives me immense pleasure to acknowledge my
indebtedness and deep sense of gratitude and respect to Mr. Jaypal singh without whose
constant guidance, this internship would have not been possible. I am thankful to him for
his invaluable teachings and advice given to me, for helping me in exploring and
understanding the legal drafting preparation for cases and research methodology better.
Sahejh Singh
Place: New Delhi Dated: 20th july, 2021
INTRODUCTION
Clinical education program for law students have been available for many years in some
Indian Law Schools. The objective of such programs is to provide an understanding of
the human, social, and policy contexts of law and legal practice.
Internship fulfills an important component of both academic and practical education in
law. The integration of professional experience into the learning process is highly
effective in developing your understanding of the law in actions, as you are able to
observe and perceive the relevance and application of theory to practice. Consequently,
the program is not simply ‘work experience’ but a significant educational experience.
In a workspace setting you will be exposed to the reality of the practice of law in all its dimensions – the
of the government and court system in the legal process.
Since the inception of BA LL.B program at the Sharda University, a practical experience
component i.e. internship has been part of the compulsory subject and thus of the BA
LL.B degree. The Legal Internship Program is not designed to teach students how to be
good lawyers (or how to be lawyers at all) it takes more than study at University to do
that. The objectives are to
Expose you to the law in operation in contexts where you will come to perceive
aspects of law which cannot be learned from reading or hearing about it ;
Allow you to perceive ways in which the formal learning you acquire at
University may be applied in practice and thereof to develop an appreciation of
the practical dimensions of legal principals;
Enable you to relate the different areas of legal practice to the importance of
developing the skills of legal research, communication, drafting, practice
management and problem-solving ; and
Enable you to observe and reflect upon the values, ethical standards and conduct
of the legal profession in practice and to develop your own attitudes of
professional responsibility.
The classroom study and practical training in the field of law is considered as two sides
of coin. The legal profession is one of the professions which are considered incomplete
without the practical training. An additional benefit of the internship program is that to
provide you with an opportunity to observe the way in which law operates in a practical
milieu, and so may assist you in making future career choices.
INTERNSHIP REPORT
(1st July to 31st July,
2021)
I may classify this internship diary in to two components : 1. the factual and analytical
information about your internship (2) drafting of legal documents.
DAILY INTERNSHIP DUTIES:
1. I was assigned to read minimum offour case files to learn how files
are maintained and how the records are maintained.
2. I was assigned to observe the proceedings during the Examination-in-
chief, Cross- Examination and Final Arguments
3. Supporting the lawyers that come into the office and program. Sitting in on
meetings and appointments and offering required assistance.
4. organizational work – photocopying, organizing papers, keeping files in order, organizing the desk.
Office type
5. Reading any suggested law related materials for my own benefit.
6. Helping clients if possible and if I am able to since I don’t know much about the field yet.
7. Interacting to various lawyers in our office.
8. Research on judgments that are related to facts of case.
ENTRY NO 1
DATED : 01.07.2021
I was assigned to observe the counseling the clients with the permission of counsel in at
least two cases. However before this I wish to mention here that client interview and
counseling was also done by the Ld. Judge, in Matrimonial dispute which is pending
before the Family court. However as per direction, I observed the interview and
counseling of two clients in two different cases namely Vipin Tyagi and Roopa Tyagin in
case titled as Vipin Tyagi And Roop Tyagi and Hari Om Sharma and Santan Dharam
Sabha Vs K C Bhargwa.
ENTRY NO. 2
DATED : 04.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF ANU GROVAR BALIGA, ADJ,
PATIALA HOUSE COURT, DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
ABC VERSUS XYZ
SECTION INVOLVED:
Claim u/s 96 of CPC, 1908.
OBSERVATION:
The decree has been passed in the favour of the client so the opposite party of my senior
has filed the appeal against the decree.
The proxy counsel on behalf of my senior requested the court to give time to file the reply
to appeal and also the proxy counsel filed vakalatnama.
NOW THE MATTER IS FIXED FOR 09.11.2021
ENTRY NO. 3
DATED : 05 .07.2021
I was sent to meet a client to get the property transferred from the name of her
grandmother to my clients name via a Will mentioning the details as to the property
which was being transferred. The process was not completed due to not having the
sufficient documents at hand.
ENTRY NO. 4
DATE 07.07.2021
Was assigned research on the topic: Whether a writ is maintainable under article 32
without going through for the same relief in concerned High Court under article 226.
Assigned the task of briefing of the paper book for the matter titled Tanya Banon
Danami Vs. Shome Nikhil Danami and Ors.
ENTRY NO. 5
DATED : 09.07.2021
CLIENT COMPROMISE
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, SAINI ENCLAVE
SANJAY SHARMA V. VOLTAS
OBSERVATION:
Handed over the chequeof rs.5000 to the complainant after settlement and matter was
listed for Lok Adalat.
ENTRY NO.6
DATED: 11.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF ANIL KUMAR SISODIA, ADJ, TIS HAZARI COURT,
DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
ANIL KUMAR DHINGRA VS. AJAY KUMAR AND ORS.
OBSERVATION:
Claim for specific performance, Permanent injunction and declaration.
My senior was appearing for the plaintiff. The adjournment was granted and next date was fixed for further arguments.
JUDGMENT/ORDER: PENDING
NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 17.10.2021
ENTRY NO. 7
DATED: 12.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF RAJ KUMAR, ADJ, TIS HAZARI, NEW DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
DALJIT V. RACHIT EXPORTS
OBSERVATION:
Recovery of money amounted 11,80,000.
ORDER/JUDGMENT: PENDING
NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 26.11.2021
Page |
ENTRY NO. 8
DATED: 14.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF SH. V.K. JAIN, CJ, TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
AMIRCHAND VS. MANOHAR
LAL
SECTION INVOLVED:
Suit for permanent injunction.
URT OBSERVATION:
s examination was to be held but the plaintiff offered the compensation in case. The matter was adjourned for a further da
GMENT/ORDER: PENDING
NEXT DATE OF HEARING: 27.10.2021
ENTRY NO. 9
DATED : 16.07.2021
Was assigned to assist associates on drafting a counter affidavit of the pre-emption
petition titled Suresh Prasad and others versus State of Bihar C.W.J.C No. 2398/2004
ENTRY NO. 10
DATED : 18.07.2021
The drafting of the case was still needed to be done. Went to meet a client as well with the
associate and heard about the issue in the matter. Later on, discussed the case law and the
various charges to be framed under IPC, started drafting work of the pending case law.
Also I was instructed to draft an anticipatory bail in the same matter.
ENTRY NO. 11
DATED : 21.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF SUDESH KUMAR SETHI, CJ ,KARKADOOMA
COURT, DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
BALJIT SINGH SINGH VS. BALJEET
SECTION INVOLVED:
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY
GENERAL OBSERVATION:
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF RS. 1,67,000.
Prosecution witness was present. Brought the original airway bill. His statement was
recorded and discharged.
ENTRY NO. 12
DATED: 25.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF HARISH KUMAR,TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHI
IN THE MATTER OF:
BALJEET SINGH
VERSUS
ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR.
COURT OBSERVATION:
Suit for recovery of amount Rs. 10,00,000.
The defendant was called to appear before the court with his bill books. The defendant was
admitted in hospital so he could not appear.
STATUS: PENDING.
ENTRY NO.13
DATED: 27.07.2021
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL JUDGE , FAMILY COURT, DELHI
MAHIPAL SHARMA ….. PETITIONER NO.1
s. BEENA SANWARIA…….
PETITIONER NO.2
BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE:
Divorce petition u/s 13B(1) of HMA.
OBSERVATION:
Only a petition was filed. Court gave order to wait for a mandatory period of 6-18
months. ORDER/JUDGMENT: PENDING
ENTRY NO.14
DATED: 29.07.2021
Assigned a work of translation of a order of District Magistrate regarding the
restriction and checks in the cases of illegal sand mining in Gonda district of Uttar
Pradesh
Was assigned to make notes on Epistolary Jurisdiction exercised by the Hon’ble Courts.
The task took around first half under which I had studied various Case laws and theories
of eminent legal personalities. Read the Article 226 and Article 32 for the purpose and
done with the notes on Public Interest Litigation and the exercised of appellate courts
over subordinate courts.
ENTRY NO. 15
DATED : 30.07.2021
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, Delhi
In the matter of : SUNIL YADAV V. JAIKISHAN
Observation: Matter involving recovery of money and damage for the faulty product sold
to our client. Further date was given for the hearing as our counsel was not able to reach
on time. I was asked by my counsel to go to the court room and ask for the matter to be
listed last that day. The honorable judge did not agree.
EXPERIENCE DURING THEINTERNSHIP
The District Court in reality is different from the court generally shown in the Movies. In
movies the job of lawyer is more similar to a detective which is a far cry from the reality.
The job of a lawyer is only to assist a party in a suit regarding the proceedings and
appear before Judge on his behalf. Every lawyer maintains a court diary, which proved
handy and very useful as all the details of the case are entered in the diary with proper
date and its petition number. It proves to be useful, as respective cases are recorded by
the lawyer date wise and it saves time to think and search of the cases as per the present
date. During my internship I learned to maintain the lawyer’s diary. It was a learning
experience as juniors take one year for learning the court proceedings which I could learn
during the period of internship. Though one month was not sufficient but it
was enough to learn about the basis. Basics can be learned only in trial court. I have
learned the basics of drafting. I could get to know about Fast Track Court and LokAdalat
which is an emerging concept. I really tried hard to learn. It was adventurous for me as
everything was unpredictable. Every client comes with a new case, new situation, a new
problem and which doesn’t have any perfect answer. I also experienced the expressions
and thoughts of the Hon’ble Judges. When they are in good mood, they will tell you how
to do the things correctly but if not then they will scold you for the simple mistakes you
have done. About advocates I experiences that it is not easy to work as an advocate, it
requires a lot of dedication and hard work, only then you can achieve success, and most
importantly social recognition.
In the office I learned all the official work, filing Talwana, Vakalatnama etc. All these
documents are very important and an advocate must know how to fill them and use them,
Talwana is used for many things such as for issuing attach warrant, issuing notices etc.
I also learned that it is very important to be always reading cases and new enactments,
keep yourself always sound minded, and while dealing with a case read the facts of the
case very carefully and try to find all the loopholes and then use them in your favor, also
while cross questioning with the witness never allow him/her to be confident ask them
twisted questions so that they become nervous and are not able to answer properly.
PART- II
DRAFTED DOCUMENTS
DOCUMENT 1.
BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT OF SH. ARUN KUMAR ARYA:
PRESIDING OFFICER-FAMILY COURT, PATIALA HOUSE
COURT, NEW DELHI
HMA CASE NO.354/2016
IN THE MATTER OF: -
SHEREEN ….PETITIONER
VERSUS
RISHANT JAIN ….RESPONDENT
APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT UNDER
SECTION151OFCODEOFCIVILPROCEDUREFOR
DIRECTION TO THE PETITIONER IN VIEW OF ORDER
DATED 10.08.2016 FOR HANDING OVER THE CHILDREN FOR
CELEBRATION OF THE BIRTHDAY OF CHILD i.e Master
VIVAAN ON 15.05.2017.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: -
1. That the Petitioner had instituted petition under section 13(1)(i)(a) of
Hindu Marriage Act alleging various acts of cruelty on her by the
Respondent.
2. That upon issuance of summons of this Hon'ble Court the Respondent put
in his appearance on 10.08.2016 before this Hon'ble Court and filed his
written statement.
3. That the Petitioner and Respondent got wedded as per Hindu Rites and
Customs on 05.12.2002 in AryaSamajMandir at VasantKunj, New Delhi
and from the said marriage wedlock two children is born on 22.07.2005
and 05.05.2011 named Shreya Jain and Vivank Jain respectively.
4. That dispute between the parties arose on 04.08.2015 and the Petitioner left with
her parents and admittedly both the children are residing with the Petitioner since
then at the parental home of the Petitioner. It is further admitted fact during the
period from 04.08.2015 the Respondent regularly meeting with his children and
even going out of station with children.
5. That the basic dispute between the parties relates to one Mr. ManasArora
who is maligning the mind of the Petitioner resultantly the relation
between the Petitioner and Respondent got strained and the same reached
to this stage that parties are before this Hon'ble Court.
6. That the Respondent forced to institute a petition under section 497 and
other section of Indian Penal Code against the accused Manas Arora who
has made dangerous efforts to spoil the relation between the Petitioner and
the Respondent and succeeded to a great extent. The Hon'ble Court of Sh.
Naresh Kumar Laka passed following orders on the complaint of the
Respondent which reads as under: -“….Submissions heard. Let status be
called from concerned SHO on the complaint in terms of judgment
of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of LalitaKumari Versus State.
Another application seeking preservation/seizure of call details of
mobile numbers i.e. 9654600372, 9711412821 & 9910072158 has
been filed. It is stated that this application is very urgent.
Accordingly, arguments heard.
As the allegations of the adultery have been leveled in the present
case, I am of the opinion that if no direction is given to
ce of the evidence. It is also the general practice that such call details are not provided to the individual private pe
application seeking preservation/seizure of call details is allowed
with the condition that Complainant will file relevant details of the
concerned service provider alongwith PF. On filing of the same,
copy of this order and copy of application be sent to the concerned
service providers with the direction to preserve the call details of
the above mentioned respective mobile number for the period as
mentioned in the application with Tower location and IMEI number.
That due to constant intervention of the accused ManasArora the Petitioner
is acting on his ill advice and not permitting the Respondent to even meet
his children which is giving immense pain and torture. The Petitioner even
not hesitating in violating the order dated 10.08.2016 as passed by this
Hon'ble Court. That an application has already been moved in this regard
by the Respondent and same is pending subjudice before the Hon'ble Court
for adjudication.
7. That through the earlier application the Petitioner had sought various
prayers related to regular meeting and comfortable interaction with his
children hence the prayer and relief sought from this Hon'ble Court
through the earlier application are not reproduced in this application in
order to avoid multiplicity of pleading and same be read as part and parcel
to this application as well.
8. That since last more than five months the Respondent is unable to live and
celebrate with his children any of the festival and occasion. It is submitted
that on 5.05.2015 the child of the respondent named Master vivaan have
birthday and the respondent want to celebrate this auspicious occasion with
his children. It is further submitting that the respondent wants to take the
children out of station for celebrating his birthday. It is further submitting
that the on 04.05.2015 have Friday and on 05.05.2015 have Saturday. The
respondent wants to take the children out of station for celebrating the
birthday on the Friday after attending the school by the children. It is
further submitting that respondent want to take the children on Friday after
attending the school by which children will not lose their study and after it
have Saturday on which school will remain closed. It is further submitted
that the birthday of the children are very auspicious occasion for the father
and every father wants to celebrate and enjoy this occasion with their
children. It is further submitting that without the presence of the children
the respondent has no meaning for that day. It is further submitting that the
after celebrating the birthday the respondent will hand over the children to
the petitioner on 06.05.2017. The respondent is seeking the permission to
take his children for celebrating the birthday of the child from this Hon’ble
court and standing before this Hon’ble for his folded hand, the Hon’ble
court may grant the permission to the respondent to take the children for
three day i.e 04.05.2017 to 06.05.2017.
9. That the respondent has already filed the application for the custody of the
children U/s section 26 of H.M.A which is pending for thedisposal.
PRAYER: -
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed before this Hon'ble Court that
Petitioner be directed to hand over the children for three days from 04.05.2017 till
06.05.2017 to celebrate the birthday of the child named MaasterVivaanand the
Respondent undertakes that he will hand over the children in the evening on
05.05.2017. It is prayed accordingly.
RESPONDENT (RISHANT JAIN)
THROUGH
PLACE:DEHI
(JAGAT SINGH BAASTA)
DATED: -
ADVOCATE ON
RECORD SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA
NEW LAWYERS CHAMBER NO.2** M.C.SHITALVAD BLOCK, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,
NEW DELHI -110001
DOCUMENT 2.
BEORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
CO.PETITION 553/2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
M/S CLASSIC SWITCHGEAR & CONTROL
PVT. LTD : PETITIONER
VERSUS
M/S VXL REALTORS PVT. LTD & ORS : RESPONDENTS
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 448 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, FOR
APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:
1. The petitioner is into the business of manufacturing, assembling and marketing of
electrical products and had preferred the present petition for winding up of the
Respondent company.
2. That the respondent no.2 and 3 directors of respondent no.1 and are engaged into
the business of construction of turnkey projects and are responsible for the
decisions of respondent no.1.
3. That the respondent no.1 through respondent no.2 and 3 approached petitioner
company for supply of one main LT Panel for their project Eastern Heights, Nyay
Khand-III, Indrapuram, Ghaziabad, U.P and also approached for supply of AMF Panel
for 250 KVA D.G a Eastern Gates, GH-3, Sector-4G, Vasundhara, Ghaziabad through
two purchase orders having purchase orders no. VXL/EG/2012/0031 &
VXL/EG/2012/0031 both dated 24.05.2012 and 16.05.2012 respectively and said
purchase order also received through email dated 17.05.2012 and 24.05.2012.
4. That against the said purchase order the petitioner supplied the same through Invoice no.
005 dated 04.06.2015 for a sum of Rs. 2,27,000.00 and through invoice no. 009 dated
05.07.2012 for a sum of Rs. 12,62,550.00 and both stand supplied to the satisfaction of
the respondents and VAT dues stand paid by the
petitioner and even same is utilized by the respondents.
5. The against the said supply of goods the respondent made part payment from
time to time and lastly paid on 20.05.2016 thereby part payment made of Rs. 8,
27,000.00 out of the total liability of Rs. 14, 89,550.00 and the respondents are
under the liability for sum of Rs. 6,62,550.00/- in favour of the petitioner
company.
6. That the petitioner company sent remainders to the respondents for making
payment of balance outstanding through email dated 02.02.2013 and 26.02.2013.
7. That the last payment of Rs. 47,000.00 was paid when the respondents were
served with personal notice dated 02.03.2013. after it the petitioner again sent
s but they had not responded, hence the respondents were served with the notice on 02.06.2014 through the speed post o
for the said outstanding amount of Rs. 6,62,550.00/-.
8. That having no option, the petitioner company has finally sent a legal notice as
per the statutory requirement of companies act, 1956 on 23.04.2016 calling upon
the respondents to make the payment to the tune of Rs. 13, 58,125.00/- which is
inclusive of interest of Rs. 6, 95,625.00/- along with principal outstanding of Rs. 6,
62,625.00/- along with principal outstanding of Rs. 6, 62,550.00/- within 21 days from
the receipt of notice on all the available addresses of the respondents. The said legal
notice also tried to serve on the Email-ID of the respondents company but same got
failed.
9. That as per the statement of ledger account, a sum of Rs. 13,58,125.00/- inclusive
of Rs. 6,62,550.00/- towards principal and interest thereon of Rs. 6,95,625.00/-
calculated till 20.04.2016 @ 3% per month is due to respondent company which
is unpaid till date. The respondent no.1 company has failed, neglected and
refused to pay the said sum of Rs. 13,58,125.00/- or any portion thereof.
10. Hence the petitioner filed the present suit. The Hon’ble court passed the interim
order in favour of petitioner vides order dated 27.09.2016. The petitioner is
always obliged for kindness act of the Hon’ble court for passing the interim order
in the favour of the petitioner
11. That the petitioner is praying for appointing the official liquidator to take the
proceeding qua the respondents.
12 This application is bona fide and for the ends of justice.
PRAYER :-
The Petitioner Company, therefore, most humbly prays Your Lordships for the following
orders:
a)That the Hon’ble court may appoint the proper person as official liquidator to take
the charge of the business affairs and assets of the respondent company with all the
necessary powers under the companies Act, 1956.
b)That the Hon’ble may give direction to attach the moveable and Immovableassets
of the respondent company.
c
That pending the hearing and final disposal of this petition, the Official Liquidator attached to this Hon’ble Cou
immediately of the business affairs and assets of the said Company with all powers
under the Companies Act, 1956.
d) Costs of and incidental to this applica
Petitioner Company at the first instan
properties of the said Company;
For such further and other reliefs as
e)
this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and p
And your petitioner as in duty bound shall e
..
CONCLUSION
The conclusion of this internship report is that I’ve worked under the Advocate of
Supreme Court of India.
During the time period of 01.07.2021 - 31.07.2021.
I’ve learned some of the basic procedures of the Court and how each of them functions
and the powers vested in each of them.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Above mentioned Contents in this Report have been provided to me by My Senior
Advocate.
I was under the Internship of Adv. JAGAT SINGH BAASTA
All the facts have been put into my Notice by the above Mentioned People.
I am able to make this Report with the help of the above Mentioned People, a Senior
Student and Google Docs.
