1

Notes on Spacetime Engineering

D. Chakalov
[email protected]
chakalov.net
September 23, 2021

Abstract

Brief and biased notes on spacetime engineering, for open-minded

people with little knowledge in physics and math. For details, RDFM1.

1. Introduction

Many years ago, I read a fascinating crime novel by Agatha Christie. It

was about a noble (also very rich) owner of an old mansion in England
(probably in Cambridgeshire), who was brutally murdered at his 50th
birthday party. I suspected the killer was either the old butler or the
gardener, as they looked very suspicious to me. But I was wrong. As
Hercule Poirot explained at the end, the killer was the maid ― a young
and pretty lady, who was actually the illegitimate daughter of the
noble owner of the mansion (he apparently knew nothing about her),
after a brief spell he had many years ago with her mother (also a noble
but very poor lady), who happened to be his second cousin. So, the
young pretty maid was seeking revenge. Now it was all obvious, but I
had to read the entire novel to connect the dots at the very last page.

This is an example of how not to write about complicated issues, such

as the spacetime of the Universe and the physics1 of the human brain.
 2

The reader should know the crux of spacetime engineering right from
the start (Fig. 1): swing the “carrot” (potential future) toward your
desired destination, and the donkey will carry you and the cart there.
Notice the Law of Reversed Effort: “To the mind that is still, the whole
universe surrenders” (Lao Tzu).

The main task is to develop

feedback from the matrix (Ch. 2)
shown as “carrot”: follow the Law
of Reversed Effort. There is no
physical interaction between you
and the matrix ― you may only
notice that your ability to perform
self-action has increased. It is not
like Baron Munchausen. Where does
the self-energy come from ?

Fig. 1

In the next chapter, I will highlight some of the new concepts above
and will explain them like a Husserlian noema ― an indefinite whole,
which becomes gradually filled with concrete content. In Ch. 3, I will
explain the ‘engine’ of spacetime engineering ― the arrow of Time
depicted in the left (vertical) section of Fig. 2 below. In Ch. 4, I will
elaborate on the matter-psyche relations (after Gottfried Leibniz2)
shown in the upper (horizontal) section of Fig. 2. Needless to say, I will
have to introduce many more ideas1, which also require explanation.

As Friedrich Schiller famously noted, only the fullness leads to clarity,

and the truth dwells into the abyss (Nur die Fülle führt zur Klarheit,
und im Abgrund wohnt die Wahrheit).

2. What is spacetime engineering?

 3

Spacetime engineering studies and explores12 our ability to change the

state of a physical system (e.g., the human body) by changing its next
future states through the ‘carrot’ in Fig. 1 viz. Res potentia in Fig. 2.
Notice the total absence of “windows” toward Res potentia below:
“The monads have no windows through which something can enter or
leave.” (Leibniz, Monadology §7.) Thus, Res potentia is not directly
accessible, not even with thought experiments. Read the doctrine of
trialism at p. 3 in The Physics of Life1. It resembles the wave-particle
duality in quantum mechanics, in the sense that the intact quantum
state (p. 4 in The Physics of Life1) is not directly observable either.

Fig. 2. See Fig. E and Fig. 5 in The Physics of Life1.

Now, the spacetime is modeled with geometry3. Not with some

physical field, which has energy and can perform work. There is no
‘geometric energy’ that can spring from ‘pure geometry’, namely,
from the bare grin of the Cheshire cat, without the cat (Fig. 3). The
second puzzle is that there is no ‘potential future’ in the current
models of spacetime, and hence no dynamics of the spacetime itself11.
 4

Theoretical physicists4 picture the world as a dead frozen block of

matter: “There is no dynamics within spacetime itself: nothing ever
moves therein; nothing happens; nothing changes.”5 If true, how can
the spacetime ― the grin of the Cheshire cat without the cat (Fig. 3) ―
‘talk back’ to matter6 ? If it can, it must be a brand new physical field.

Fig. 3. Symbolic presentation of Einstein’s equations.

In 1976, Hans Ohanian wrote6: “matter (the Cheshire cat – D.C.) acts
on the gravitational field (changes the fields), but there is no mutual
action of gravitational fields on matter; that is, the gravitational field
(the grin of the cat without the cat – D.C.) can acquire energy-
momentum from matter, but nevertheless the energy-momentum of
matter is conserved (∂vTμν = 0). This is an inconsistency.” I think it is
more than “inconsistency”. It is sheer parapsychology, like saying
‘abracadabra ― voila!’. Read Matt Visser17 and pp. 22 ff.

As Zhao-Yan Wu rigorously demonstrated, “there is no spring or sink

everywhere in spacetime for matter energy-momentum, therefore
gravitational field does not exchange energy-momentum with both
electromagnetic field and particles (charged and uncharged). Hence it
does not carry energy-momentum. Gravitational field is not a force
field, and gravity is not a natural force.”7 Read Albert Einstein23.
 5

Can we make gravity a natural force6,9 ? Yes we can, but the solution is
counter-intuitive: we introduce a Platonic state of the entire Universe
as ONE, called here Res potentia (Fig. 2), which is the source of both
geometry and matter. It (not “He”) is their common cause8 accessible
via Res potentia (Fig. 2) viz. via the carrot in Fig. 1. Now, replace the
carrot with the so-called matrix (p. 4 and p. 6 in The Physics of Life1).

Think of the matrix as a virtual pool of infinitely many instructions of

the type ‘if P, then Q’, which create and sustain all living organisms
and quantum-gravitational systems (p. 19 in Quantum of Spacetime1),
such as the brain, the protons and photons, and the 4D physical world.

NB: Spacetime engineering works by tweaking the Platonic matrix

placed in the potential future (Fig. 4): see Fig. 4 in The Physics of
Life1. It is the blueprint of the arrow of Time11.

Fig. 4. See also Slide 1 and Side 2, and Fig. E.

The matrix is nether matter nor psyche. It is the pre-geometric Res

potentia (Fig. 2): a Platonic form of reality, “just in the middle
between possibility and reality” (Werner Heisenberg10). There is no
metric in the matrix. It is exactly nullified in the physical 4D world:
see Fig. 10 and pp. 9-10 in The Physics of Life1. The matrix inhabits
 6

only the potential future of the Heraclitean arrow of Time11, hence it

cannot be observed with light. But it is not some “mystery matter”.

Forget “dark energy” and “dark matter”. GR is essentially incomplete

(Fig. 3). Are the Earth tides9 caused by some mythical “dark energy”?

Now we have to dive into the abyss: the arrow of Time11. With light,
we can see only the irreversible past, e.g., the state of the Sun 500
sec ago (p. 4 in Time.pdf). What if Time is perfectly hidden by light?

3. The arrow of Time

The Heraclitean arrow of Time11 is not relational phenomenon: there is

no ‘absolute space’, like the river banks at absolute rest, with respect
to which we could define the ‘flow of water’11. We cannot define the
rate of Time13,14 either ― ‘one second per second’ makes no sense. We
cannot observe with light the elementary transitions of Time (Fig. 7),
“separating” the potential future from the past (Fig. 4), either. Matter
and fields have positive energy density, and they live only in the past.

On 21 September 200816, commemorating Hermann Minkowski’s Raum

und Zeit (21 September 1908), I suggested two modes of spacetime:
local (physical) mode, and global (Platonic) mode. The local mode is
what physicists call ‘time as read with a clock’. This local time is from
‘change in space’, such as the coordinate time, whereas the global
(Platonic) mode of spacetime pertains to ‘change of space’16. Every 4D
point/event in spacetime is endowed with the two modes (Side 2), but
the elementary ‘change of space’(Slide 1) is unobservable with light18.
 7

Why is this important? Because of the indisputable blueprints of the

global (Platonic) mode of the entire Universe as ONE, embedded in the
local (physical) mode17, like a Platonic hand perfectly embedded in its
4D glove (p. 5 in Quantum of Spacetime1). Don’t trust GR textbooks.

NB: The Platonic hand makes the ‘4D glove’ self-acting (Fig. 1). Any
effort to derive the self-action of gravity from physical fields leads to
fictitious “dark energy” and “black holes”. Check out the so-called
evolution equation at p. 28 (last) in The Physics of Life1. Bottom line
is to move at pre-geometric level and split (Fig. 4) the geometric point
‘here and now’18, in order to “insert” the atemporal ‘change of space’
mentioned above. Complicated? Let’s go to the “speed” of light18.

Suppose you are tossing a ball toward a wall and are monitoring ball’s
trajectory. You have recorded four consecutive instantaneous states of
the ball, at which it has come back to you (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. See Fig. E and Fig. 11 at p. 12 in The Physics of Life1.

But if you are shooting a photon toward a mirror, you will see only a
perfectly continual trajectory of four photons (Fig. 5). You can never
see the photons going toward the mirror, bouncing back, and hitting
your eyes. With light18, we see the physical world only post factum,
and only once-at-a-time, as recorder with a clock (local mode). With
 8

light, we cannot see the so-called negative mass15, dubbed Macavity19.

No region ∆t of “total negative energy” (Adam Helfer19) can live on the
light cone. In summary, the phenomena of causality and locality are
indissolubly linked to the perfect continuum of Time11,13. Check out
again the so-called evolution equation (p. 28 in The Physics of Life1),
driven by the self-energy of the Unmoved Mover21 ― the Final Cause.

Everything said above pertains to the question of how to bind matter

to matter with the ‘engine’ of spacetime engineering ― the arrow of
Time depicted in the left (vertical) section of Fig. 2. The next question
is how to bind mind to matter, depicted with the upper (horizontal)
section of Fig. 2: the doctrine of trialism (p. 3 in The Physics of Life1).

4. How to bind mind to matter?

Thirty-two years ago, in January 199020, the task was looking doable.
Not anymore22. Why making these efforts? A friend of mine18 asked
recently whether he could learn spacetime engineering without the
hassle of reading “your crazy stuff”. Suppose you wish to learn how to
juggle three balls: watch the manual at YouTube. However, suppose
you cannot see the balls, and actually have three spoons at your
disposal. You only believe that you’re dealing with balls, but they are
in facts spoons. Then suppose you believe that you will be tossing balls
(not spoons) in the air, but you have feedback from your legs only,
because you are blindfolded and can’t see anything. You try to move
your arms and toss the balls in the air, but in fact you’re moving your
legs and kicking the three spoons on the floor. What skill could you
learn without that “crazy stuff”? Try meditating on a rock instead.
 9

Let me explain the matrix above. Suppose you are slicing onion with a
kitchen knife and accidentally cut your finger: you put a plaster on it
to heal faster and on the next day your skin will recover completely.
Trivial, you may say, but recall that there is no custom-made software
application, which can be inserted in every skin cell to execute such
process, just in case you cut your finger22. This is how the biological
matrix works. The second quantum-gravitational matrix is even more
effective, as it creates the protons and photons, and the 4D physical
world. Last but not least, the brain has access to the third cognitive
matrix, as demonstrated with the experiment below.

Imagine a cube made of some white plastic material, with 3 cm

rib, painted blue, which you cut into 27 little cubes, 1 cm each,
and ask yourself the question: how many little cubes have 3
painted sides, 2, 1, and zero?

Compare this exercise to the demonstration by Flavian Glont, who can

arrange approximately 43 quintillion (43.1030) permutations of the
Rubik Cube blindfolded: watch 6:33 to 6:38 at YouTube (Fig. 6) and
noticed that at the end he was “looking” at cube’s cognitive matrix for
nearly 2 sec. What was he “looking” at? Read my mind.

Fig. 6
 10

Now you have to apply the doctrine of trialism (p. 3 in The Physics of
Life1) to merge all types of matrixes, and use your brain to practice
spacetime engineering (Ch. 2). It works better than a Swiss watch12,
but perhaps it will be more difficult than learning to juggle three balls.
As Henry Ford famously noted, whether you believe you can do a thing
or believe you can’t, you are right. The corollary in German: Die beste
Art die Zukunft vorauszusagen ist, sie selbst zu erschaffen. Good luck.

5. Criticism

As stated in the abstract, my notes are biased. The best I can do is to

examine critically every piece of the theory and try to prove it wrong,
or at least redundant. I will list here my efforts to demolish my theory.
The reason is very simple. Every theory is like a map that is supposed
to pinpoint the location of a hidden treasure. Any error, no matter how
small, in the map can make it unusable to find the treasure. It will be
like ‘kicking spoons on the floor’ above. I don’t care at all about my
‘map’. It is just a tool. You will be the judge. Read also Ch. 7 below.

Let me start with criticizing the arrow of Time11 in Nature, and then I
will focus on its presentation in my ‘map’: the left (vertical) section of
Fig. 2. Later, I will critically examine the upper (horizontal) section of
Fig. 2 (the doctrine of trialism, p. 3 in The Physics of Life1). Hopefully,
this can make my ‘map’ falsifiable, to some extent at least.

5.1. The arrow of Time is not physical phenomenon. In physics5, one

can only suggest global hyperbolicity from the ‘block universe’ (p. 4).
 11

5.1.1. Agree. The arrow of Time is not physical phenomenon, because

it cannot be a relational phenomenon. Otherwise the river banks11 at
“absolute rest” could be detected with light and the Ether will become
physical stuff providing absolute coordinates, which will demolish the
Theory of Relativity. See Fig. 14 at p. 15 in The Physics of Life1.

5.2. The arrow of Time, shown in the left (vertical) section of Fig. 2, is
not backed by physical evidence.

5.2.1. See 5.1.1. The arrow of Time is empowered by the self-energy

of the Unmoved Mover21 ― the Final Cause. This is the fifth force. Let
me zoom on the elementary step (a.k.a. chronon) of ‘change of space’
mentioned in Ch. 3: the quantum of spacetime. Is it falsifiable ?

First, a thought experiment. Fig. 7 shows two of the photons in Fig. 5.

t2
t1

Fig. 7. Adapted from Fig. K on p. 21 in Quantum of Spacetime1.

Your good old clock reads (t2 – t1 > 0) as the infinitesimal (ε) temporal
interval along the local (physical) time mentioned in Ch. 3. Your clock
 12

cannot read the “vertical” shift in Fig. 7 viz. the dark strips in Fig. 5,
separating the consecutive snapshots from the movie reel. In ADM
hypothesis, however, the “vertical” shift in Fig. 7 above is part and
parcel from the spacetime (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8

In Fig. 8, the “leaves” (shown with balls in Fig. 5) are welded together
by themselves. In Fig. 7, the two “leaves” are welded together in a
perfect (Sic!) continuum, and are empowered by the Unmoved Mover21
― the Final Cause (5.2.1). Which of the two ‘maps’ matches Nature?
The answer is very simple: without the vertical dark strips in Fig. 5,
there will be only one single ‘snapshot’ of Nature. As John A. Wheeler
put it, Time is Nature’s way of keeping everything from happening at
once. Ergo, Fig. 8 is false. Forget GR5 (p. 4).

In general, the notion of spacetime (the left-hand side in Fig. 3) should

be treated as an adjective. If we say ‘this is blue’, we have to explain
what is ‘blue’ (say, blue Cheshire cat at the right-hand side in Fig. 3).
But the spacetime itself (the left-hand side in Fig. 3) does not have its
own energy to ‘act back’ on its source: “there is no mutual action of
 13

gravitational fields on matter” (H. Ohanian). The only possible solution

is to empower the Cheshire cat (the right-hand side in Fig. 3) with the
self-action of gravity: read NB at p. 7 and 5.2.1. With GR, physicists
cannot explain even the Earth tides9. Forget GR (p. 4).

5.3. Influence from the future (Fig. 4) can change the past: the
grandfather paradox.

5.3.1. Nothing can change the irreversible past in Heraclitean Time:

you cannot step twice into the same stream11. With light, we observe
the past only post factum, only after the cat Macavity19 has already
finished its job. The Platonic state of the world “outside the train”18
corresponds to the atemporal “gaps” of ‘change of space’ (Ch. 3) viz.
the “gaps” between the two consecutive states of the rocket in Fig. 7.

Let’s move to the upper (horizontal) section of Fig. 2 and the doctrine
of trialism (p. 3 in The Physics of Life1). I will critically examine the
self-action of the human brain ― only matter can interact with matter
― exhibited in the binding phenomenon, which is acts as “mediator” of
the human mind and volition (Res cogitans) via the common source of
matter & psyche2, dubbed Res potentia (Fig. 2). The latter lives only in
the potential future of the arrow of Time (Fig. 4). Thus, the matter &
psyche2 are not directly linked ― the psyche (Res cogitans) does not
have energy to interact with its physical correlate (Res extensa) above
your neck, just as there is no generic “gravitational energy” (Zhao-Yan
Wu). To explain this counter-intuitive puzzle, I suggested in January
1990 the idea of fundamental dualism20, which was later (April 2000)
upgraded to the doctrine of trialism (Slide 14). The idea is as follows.
 14

Suppose you are an Eskimo, who has never seen and will never see an
elephant in his life. Yet you can make observations on elephant’s trunk
with two complementary devices, measuring either properties of your
arm, or properties of your nose. You can never imagine the common
source of your arm (Res cogitans) and of your nose (Res extensa),
which you blindly called trunk (Res potentia), because the latter does
not have any arm-like windows nor nose-like windows: it (not “He”) is
‘the true monad without windows’. You may only suggest that what
you see as an arm (Res cogitans) is pre-correlated with what you see as
a nose (Res extensa) by pre-established harmony2. But again, you’re an
Eskimo and cannot even imagine the ‘trunk’ (Res potentia).

For example, recall the experiment with your brain in Ch. 4: your brain
(nose) interacted with your mind (arm) via their “hub” called trunk or
Res potentia in Fig. 2. There is no direct “arm-nose” connection.

Thus, the spacetime engineering (Fig. 1) is based on three matrixes:

read closely pp. 9-10 and the explanation of Fig. 4. However, there are
many objections to the doctrine of trialism.

5.4. The so-called trunk is utterly controversial, like apples&oranges.

5.4.1. Agree. But the alternative that the psyche emerged from
psyche, and matter emerged from matter, leads to infinite regress:
‘turtles all the way down’. There should be a cutoff in Nature, which,
for example, prompted Aristotle to suggest the Unmoved Mover21.
 15

5.5. The so-called trunk (p. 14) is inherently incomprehensible.

5.5.1. True. Our cognition works with a set of objects, call it A, which
can be defined only relationally, with respect to another set non-A.
The ‘set of all sets’, pertaining to ‘the entire Universe as ONE’, is not
a ‘set’. It is inherently incomprehensible to us. But Nature is smarter.
The latter may be an undecidable proposition. Ultimately, the trunk is
ONE incomprehensible entity, resembling the Noumenon. Nur die Fülle
führt zur Klarheit, und im Abgrund wohnt die Wahrheit (Fr. Schiller).

6. References and Notes

1. D. Chakalov (2021), Quantum of Spacetime: Zenon Connection, pp.

15-25. http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/quantum.pdf
D. Chakalov (2021), The Physics of Life, Fig. 5, pp. 12-13, pp. 26-28.
http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Intro.pdf

2. Pre-established harmony. Wikipedia, 2021.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-established_harmony

3. D. Chakalov (2020), Can Geometry Produce Work, p. 5, p. 9, p. 20,

p. 23. http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/GR_textbook.pdf

4. George F. R. Ellis (1 Aug 2006), Physics in the Real Universe: Time

and Spacetime. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0605049v5

5. Robert Geroch (1981), General Relativity from A to B.

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Geroch_p3_p21.jpg

6. Hans C. Ohanian (1976), Gravitation and Spacetime, p. 103.

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Hans_p_103.jpg
Hans C. Ohanian (2013), The Energy-Momentum Tensor in General
Relativity and in Alternative Theories of Gravitation, and the
Gravitational vs. Inertial Mass. arXiv:1010.5557v2, p. 3.
http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/non_conservation.jpg
 16

7. Zhao-Yan Wu, Gravitational Energy-momentum and Conservation of

Energy-momentum in General Relativity, Commun. Theor. Phys. 65
(2016) 716-730. http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/ctp.pdf

8. Christopher Hitchcock and Miklós Rédei (2020), Reichenbach’s

Common Cause Principle, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-Rpcc/

9. Earth tide. Wikipedia, 2021. Read about balancing apples here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_tide#Body_tide

10. Werner Heisenberg (1999), Physics and Philosophy, p. 43.

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/Heisenberg.jpg

11. Heraclitus. Wikipedia, 2021.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclitus#Panta_rhei

Everything changes and nothing remains still ―

you cannot step twice into the same stream.

12. D. Chakalov (2022), Spacetime Engineering 201. Video lecture,

app. 20 min; see ref. [53] on p. 24 in The Physics of Life1.

13. W.G. Unruh (17 Dec 1993), Time, Gravity, and Quantum Mechanics,
arXiv:gr-qc/9312027v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9312027v2
 17

p. 4: “The lesson of these experiments would appear to be that gravity

alters the way clocks run. Such a dependence of time on gravity would
have been strange enough for the Newtonian view, but General
Relativity is actually much more radical than that. A more accurate
way of summarizing the lessons of General Relativity is that gravity
does not cause time to run differently in different places (e.g., faster
far from the earth than near it).

“Gravity is the unequable flow of time from place to place. It is not

that there are two separate phenomena, namely gravity and time and
that the one, gravity, affects the other. Rather the theory states that
the phenomena we usually ascribe to gravity are actually caused by
time’s flowing unequably from place to place.”

14. Time along the axis W in Fig. 7 is imaginary: Arthur S. Eddington,

Space, Time and Gravitation, 1920, pp. 48-51; see also Ethan Siegel.

15. H. Bondi, Negative Mass in General Relativity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 29,
423 (1957); Negative mass. Wikipedia, 2021.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_mass#Runaway_motion

16. D. Chakalov (2 June 2008), The Arrow of Spacetime (21.09.2008,

10-10:45 AM).

17. Matt Visser (17 Apr 2002), The quantum physics of chronology
protection, arXiv:gr-qc/0204022v2.

p. 3: “The essence of the problem lies in the fact that the Einstein
equations of general relativity are local equations, relating some
aspects of the spacetime curvature at a point to the presence of
stress-energy at that point. (…) What general relativity does not do is
to provide any natural way of imposing global constraints on the
spacetime ‒ certainly the Einstein equations provide no such nonlocal
constraint. In cosmology this leads to the observation that the global
topology of space is not constrained by the Einstein equations; spatial
topology is an independent discrete variable that has to be decided by
observation.”
 18

Note: The Einstein equations23 (Fig. 3) should be quasi-local equations,

relating the local properties of matter and fields to the nonlocal global
properties of the entire spacetime en bloc. Which is why I suggested
the so-called global mode of spacetime (Ch. 3). The latter inserts
nonlocal constraints into every 4D point/event, perfectly embedded:
think globally (Fig. E), act locally. The end results produce inertia and
Killing field, and causality and time-orientability in general. Forget GR.

18. D. Chakalov (2019), Platonic Theory of Spacetime, p. 31.

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/p_31.jpg

19. Adam D. Helfer (18 Sep 1997), Are Negative Energy Densities
Detectable? arXiv:gr-qc/9709047v1.

p. 1: “T. S. Eliot described a ‘mystery cat,’ Macavity, responsible for

all sorts of mischief. But when the crime’s discovered, Macavity’s not
there!”

20. D. Chakalov (15 January 1990), How to Bind Mind to Matter?

Abstract at http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/mind-matter.pdf

21. Unmoved mover. Wikipedia, 2021.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover

22. D. Chakalov (2019), The Physics of Life: Flipping a Quantum Coin,

pp. 8-9. http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/q_coin.pdf

“Finally, I wish to explain why I wrote this paper. Back in November

1989, I completed my first manuscript on the physics of life, entitled:
‘How to Bind Mind to Matter?’. It was dated 15 January 1990, to mark
eighteen years of study and research, which I started in January 1972,
at age 19. I am old and probably won’t be around to witness the
devastating climate catastrophe, but many younger people, including
my loved ones, will. I feel like being brutally forced, along with my
children and grandchildren, to take a seat in a rubber boat, surrounded
by a bunch of crazy idiots, who enjoy rafting on a mountain river
toward a gigantic waterfall a few kilometers ahead (p. 38). I can only
shout at these morons to stop immediately our boat, before it is too
late. For if we pass the tipping point, we will be dead close to
Climageddon and WWIII. Don’t even think that WWIII cannot happen
because governments were “smart”. They are not.”
 19

23. Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, ed. by Paul Arthur Schilpp.

Tudor Publishing Company, New York, 1951.

p. 75: “The right side is a formal condensation of all things whose

comprehension in the sense of a field-theory is still problematic. Not
for a moment, of course, did I doubt that this formulation was merely
a makeshift in order to give the general principle of relativity a
preliminary closed expression. For it was essentially not anything more
than a theory of the gravitational field, which was somewhat
artificially isolated from a total field of as yet unknown structure.”

7. Questions & Answers

Q1. You said that you have an equation. What do you mean?

A1. Equations show particular patterns (Gesetzmäßigkeiten) in Nature.

Please see the so-called evolution equation at p. 28 in The Physics of
Life1 and read Sec. 8 at pp. 18-19 therein. However, my equation is
still in symbolic form, firstly because we need new Mathematics (the
so-called hyperimaginary numbers) to develop quantum gravity based
on the three types of mass (positive, negative15, and imaginary). Thus,
my equation is rather an invitation (Q2) for comprehensive research by
mathematicians and theoretical physicists with professional knowledge
in topology and differential geometry. In my (probably biased) opinion,
we have a chance to develop, with industrial spacetime engineering, a
new and perfectly clean energy source, which could solve the climate
crisis22. We may also learn how to modify gravity to fly like a ‘gimbal’.

The ‘gimbal’ is driven only by gravitational

radiation reaction, with no external forces.
Pity the theory by Ezra T. Newman et al. (J.
Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 1884-1891) is wrong.
Do you know how to take surface integrals at
infinity (Fig. E)? Do you know the origin of
gravitational radiation? The fifth force. It is
an immensely powerful phenomenon (p. 25).

All this is for you, my dear reader. I personally don’t need industrial
spacetime engineering viz. new energy sources or new flying machines.
I’m fine.
 20

Q2: What numbers are you suggesting?

A2. I called them hyperimaginary numbers, denoted w. If squared,

these numbers are exactly nullified: w2 = 0. We will use them to
present what “happens” within lightlike (null) intervals: “A photon
arriving in our eye from a distant star will not have aged, despite
having (from our perspective) spent years in its passage” (Wikipedia).
Namely, if the squared invariant interval Δs2 = 0, then r2 = c2Δt2, which
means that the spatial separation is equal to the “distance” light
travels ― zero18. The normal and tangential “directions” in lightlike
intervals are mathematically indistinguishable, but I expect that the
atemporal14, not-yet-squared w will offer a different view, which can
help us understand the atemporal “gaps” in Fig. 7 viz. the postulated
‘change of space’(Ch. 3) and the evolution equation. Qui vivra verra.

Q3. When can we watch your video lecture12?

A3. Please follow the steps (1)-(2)-(3) at p. 5 in explanation.pdf. I will

reply within five working days and will send you the link to my video.

Again, the Platonic origin (P) of both spacetime and matter (Q) leads
to a new non-linear and self-acting 4D ‘glove’ (M. Escher). Forget GR.

Do not use tensors to develop the correct theory of gravity, in neither

side of the equation depicted in Fig. 3. To include the negative mass15
in quantum gravity (p. 18), start with the so-called evolution equation
explained on p. 28 (last) in The Physics of Life1: |mi|2 = |m|2 (Eq. 2).
 21

Q4. How can I learn spacetime engineering?

A4. Read Henry Ford above, pp. 15-25 and C2 (p. 13) in Quantum of
Spacetime1, and also pp. iii - vi in Sec. Q&A in The Physics of Life1.
However, everything you can learn from me is only half of what you
need to practice spacetime engineering ― I can only help you get on
the right track, so that you are not kicking spoons on the floor (p. 8).
The rest you can do only by yourself: ask God (Matthew 7:7) for help,
in order to help the people around you. Otherwise it won’t work.

Q5. Can you explain your ideas in simple terms?

A5. Let me use Plato’s allegory of the cave (Wikipedia). Unlike the 4D
physical world (e.g., the Sun, see p. 4 in Time.pdf), the Platonic world
cannot be observed with light18. But it is not a physical stiff, so do not
call it “dark” (p. 6). We are mental “shadows” watching physicalized
4D “shadows”, like the Eskimos (p. 14) pictured below. See also Fig. E.

We apply the Heraclitean arrow of Time11 to introduce dynamics to the

“shadows” above, and suggest three Platonic remnants ― “just in the
middle between possibility and reality”, Werner Heisenberg10 ― called
matrixes (p. 5 and p. 9). There is no metric in the matrixes, just as
there is no distance between the concept of a tree and the concept of
a mountain in your memory. We interpret the Platonic matrixes as an
atemporal luxonic memory of the Universe: “A photon arriving in our
eye from a distant star will not have aged” (Q2). Once created, it does
not decay (p. 5), and cannot be eaten by worms. Once we drop our old
deteriorating “jackets”, we simply go back home18, ad infinitum. Only
the math (Q2) is still unknown. Help is needed, time is running out!22
 22

Addendum 1

What is spacetime? Why is the Heraclitean Time11 imaginary14 ? Good

questions. I can only try to offer my (probably biased) opinion. At the
end of the day, I hope you will grasp the doctrine of trialism (p. 13),
the “carrot” in Fig. 1, and the issues in Fig. E. But first, what is light?

Rest assured that light itself does not travel anywhere, because it is
everywhere (Fig. E). Only the photon travels with the invariant speed
denoted c. If we try to “look” at 4D spacetime with the physical time
read with a clock, we may picture the nodes in Fig. A like “sandbags”
(photons) being passed from one node to the neighboring one, thereby
creating EM waves. These sandbags (photons) oscillate back and forth
to the neighboring nodes, but one cannot time the elementary shift of
sandbags/photons between the different nodes in Fig. A. Why? Because
the elementary shift of Time (Fig. 7) is atemporal14. With light, we see
only the irreversible past (Fig. 4), and with squared physical time (Q2).

Let me try to explain the omnipresent atemporal Ether, depicted with

black background in Fig. A and Fig. B. It (not “He”) is the atemporal
Platonic world as well (Q5), shown in Fig. E below.

Fig. A. Watch it at YouTube. Fig. B. Watch it at YouTube.

As I mentioned previously, the notion of spacetime (the left-hand side

in Fig. 3) should be treated as an adjective (p. 12): spacetime of what?
The current theory of relativity, however, cannot include the intact
quantum world ― read Erwin Schrödinger from 1935 at p. 4, p. 9, and
p. 26, and also NB at p. 17 in The Physics of Life1. The intact quantum
world exists as Platonic reality “just in the middle between possibility
and reality” (Werner Heisenberg10). Question is, can we talk about an
intact quantum-gravitational Platonic world? Yes we can and we must,
 23

because there is no other choice ― the current theory of spacetime4,5

desperately needs the intact quantum-gravitational Platonic world.

When we talk about ‘space’, we usually imagine something like a vast

warehouse that keeps all kinds of objects in it, like planets, stars, etc.
We may see the roof of the warehouse with telescopes, but it is like a
horizon at sea. Every point in the warehouse is also its legitimate
“center”, meaning that even if you travel arbitrarily far away in any
direction, you will never get “closer” to the “edge” of the warehouse.

Is the space unlimited? Physicists do not know, because there is too

much “mystery matter” to speculate about the shape of the universe.

Let’s start with something we can clearly define locally, such as the
dimensions of 3D space (Fig. C), and then will try to increase its size by
shooting light beams from the center toward the “edge” of 3D space.

Can light reach the endpoints/edges (if any) of space and stop there?
Or perhaps light will bounce back and hit the center of Fig. C below,
much like Chuck Norris counted to null infinity and back? No way José.

But is there anything that can wrap the 3D space en bloc? As Stephen
Leacock explained: “We cannot imagine that the stars go on forever.
It’s unthinkable. But we equally cannot imagine that they come to a
stop and that beyond them is nothing, and then more nothing.
Unending nothing is as incomprehensible as unending something.”

Fig. C Fig. D

Yes, space is indeed bounded, but not by ‘outer space’ (Ned Wright).
The pre-geometric Platonic world (Fig. E) is a different type of reality.
 24

The Universe is like an

unbroken ring with no
circumference, for the
circumference W is nowhere,
and the center W is
everywhere.

Fig. E. Read closely p. 18. No “spacetime curvature”.

It wraps the spacetime both “beyond” future null infinity and “inside”
every 4D instant here-and-now: split the photon to “see” it (Fig. 4).

Let me try to explain how the pre-geometric Platonic world (Fig. E)

works with the ‘time of light’, by assembling the invariant spacetime
interval along the perfectly continual physical time, as read with a
clock within every finite interval (t2 – t1 > 0) shown in Fig. 7.

We will convert ‘distances in space’ to ‘meters of light-travel time’, so

that 1m equals app. 3.3 ns of light-travel time. To quote Edwin Taylor
and John A. Wheeler (click Fig. D): “We assume that every clock in the
latticework, whatever its construction, has been calibrated in meters
of light-travel time.”

Calibrated? By what? By the atemporal Platonic world. It wraps every

4D spacetime point: see Fig. 4 and recall the invisible ― with light ―
strips separating the instantaneous frames in the movie reel in Fig. 5.
More on the calibration of the invariant spacetime interval at pp. iv - v
in The Physics of Life1. Notice also the ‘gimbal’ at p. 19. Simple, no?

Now you probably say ― naah, there’s no such animal! But is there any
metric in your memory, with which you could separate, for example,
the notion of a tree from the notion of a mountain? They are different
concepts and, unlike any physical stuff, they do not decay in time. The
same tallies to the Platonic matrix (p. 5). The latter is like a Platonic
hand perfectly embedded in its 4D glove (p. 7). With light, we see only
a self-acting 4D glove (p. 7), and the Platonic hand enables the glove
to “think” globally and act locally ― read the note at p. 18. Which is
why the spacetime ― the bare grin of the cat without the cat, Fig. 3 ―
has global properties as well, defined by the global (Platonic) mode of
spacetime (p. 6). Thus, the local properties of mater, defined by the
local physical cat, and the global properties of 4D spacetime defined
 25

by the matrix (p. 5) are inseparable and perfectly embedded into

every spacetime point/event (Fig. 4) in the self-acting 4D glove (p. 7).

The self-action is the hallmark of the physics of Life. This is the fifth
force empowering gravity, the human brain, and all living organisms
and quantum-gravitational systems. Read p. iii in The Physics of Life1
and recall Albert Einstein23. The mythical dark energy, dark matter,
and black holes are for the birds (p. 6). You will have to start anew.

To wrap up, let me go back to my announcement from January 199020.

The so-called biocausality is the general form of retarded (no faster
than light communication, see 5.3) causality: the cause belongs only
and exclusively only to the past light cone of its effect. In all three
types of matrixes (p. 5 and p. 9), the feedback from the potential
future (Fig. 4) is embedded in the infinitesimal (ε) temporal interval
(t2 – t1 > 0) along the local (physical) time, explained in Fig. 7. Thus,
the feedback from the potential future (Fig. 4) is always inserted in
the past light cone of its effect, like the cat Macavity19: read p. 10 in
The Physics of Life1.

This is the atemporal feedback from the entire Platonic world (for
example, in the origin of inertia), encoded in the so-called Zenon
Connection (Sec. 4 in Quantum of Spacetime1). This is the fifth force
(5.2.1). In the inanimate macroscopic world (say, your laptop), the
feedback from the potential future (Fig. 4), carried out by Macavity19,
is effectively zero, which is why every event ‘here and now’ is FAPP
determined only by its past. Subsequently, your laptop cannot act on
itself. In all living and quantum-gravitational systems, the fifth force,
facilitated by the three matrixes (p. 9), makes them self-acting (p. 7).
But only the human brain is equipped with biological and cognitive
matrixes (p. 9) and can be trained in spacetime engineering (Fig. 1).

Sure enough, the fifth force (5.2.1) in the human brain is many orders
of magnitudes weaker than the Earth tides9 and “dark energy” (p. 6),
perhaps in the range of the Casimir force. What matters here is that
the fifth force may spring from the “negative” energy15 stored in the
quantum vacuum, with the ultimate precision of geometric points.

As an example of biocausality above, recall the correlation of two

nuclear submarines, leading to their collision in the Atlantic Ocean in
February 2009. If any of their captains was trained in spacetime
engineering (Fig. 1), the “synchronicity” could have been avoided by
 26

anticipating their dangerous correlation, much like your brain worked

with the painted cube (p. 9). Keep in mind, however, that spacetime
engineering (Q4) is not parapsychology: read C2 on p. 13 in Quantum
of Spacetime1. God as Love (1 John 4:8) may very well exist. Surely
you can ignore it, but then you could only entertain people with your
“magic”, say, with “bus levitation”. We have a different agenda12,22.

On the theoretical side, we want to restore causality in the quantum

world. To paraphrase Einstein, God casts the matrix (p. 5), not the
dice. This is quantum causality, as the shift to the next future state
(Slide 1) is performed with the quantum of action viz. the so-called
Zenon Connection (Sec. 4 in Quantum of Spacetime1). There is no
fundamental “uncertainty” in the intact quantum world. Dead matter
makes quantum jumps; the living and quantum matter is smarter.

Finally, let me again stress that everything at my website is just a map

(Ch. 5). I don’t claim any discovery, firstly because my equation (p. 7)
is still in symbolic form (Q2). Quote from p. 8 in Gravitational Energy:

There is a nice French saying: une hirondelle ne fait pas le printemps.

(One swallow doesn’t make a spring.) In my case, I can modify it as
follows: Une hirondelle ne fait pas le printemps. Deux hirondelles ne
fait pas le printemps non plus. Mais cinq hirondelles ... well, that’s a
whole new ball game!

I have so far developed five cases of spacetime engineering (Fig. 1).

That’s a whole new ball game, in my opinion. But not “discovery”.

Should you wish to learn more (Q3), read my note on physical theology
and follow the steps (1)-(2)-(3) at p. 5 in explanation.pdf. Good luck.

Addendum 2

The second demonstration of spacetime engineering, called brain-

controlled quantum tunneling, is scheduled for March 202212. It must
be recorded under tightly controlled laboratory conditions at some
renowned technical institute or university, under the supervision of
qualified physicists and technicians. If I record it alone at my home,
people will ignore it and call it “magic”. But any sufficiently advanced
technology is indistinguishable from “magic” (Clarke’s Third Law).
 27

The macroscopic quantum tunneling ― the first off mystery in quantum

mechanics ― is known since 1911, thanks to Charles Wilson; read p. 27
in The Physics of Life1. The case of brain-controlled quantum tunneling
may be even more puzzling, as it involves the new biocausality (p. 25)
and quantum causality (p. 26). To get you started, let me illustrate the
metaphysical principle of locality (an object is directly influenced only
by its infinitesimal surrounding) in the inanimate macroscopic world at
the length scale of tables and chairs, e.g., in your laptop (p. 25). I will
use four snapshots from the trajectory of the billiard ball in Fig. F.

Fig. F. Compare it to Fig. 5.

Obviously, the first state of the ball can reach its last state if and only
if the ball passed through its intermediate states. But suppose that the
same ball in Fig. F is pre-correlated with all billiard balls (not shown)
via their common potential states, by their intact, atemporal, and
not-yet-physicalized Platonic matrix (p. 5) depicted in Fig. G below.

Fig. G. Read Werner Heisenberg10, p. 43.

Then all billiard balls, including the one in Fig. F above, will be EPR-
like pre-correlated and will exhibit holomovement like a school of fish.
The billiard balls will always follow the principle of locality, but now
they will be “alive” and pre-correlated like the neurons in the human
brain, participating in their fleeting neural pathways.

Who is playing the “billiard game” using the fifth force (p. 25)? You.
Recall the experiment with your brain at p. 9. But to use spacetime
engineering (Q4), you will have to increase the fifth force (p. 25) and
gain control over the quantum tunneling. If we use the example with
 28

the single billiard ball in Fig. F, now the ball can literally jump into
any of its four physical states, via its potential Platonic states in the
global mode of 4+0 D spacetime (p. 5 and Fig. E), depicted in Fig. G.

Again, the translocation of the ball between any of its physical states
will always follow the principle of locality, only now the ball will face
a continuous spectrum of equally-possible physicalizable states, which
can be otherwise separated by large (including space-like) distances. In
short, the exercise has two stages: (i) make all billiard balls EPR-like
correlated or “alive” (p. 27), and (ii) increase further your fifth force
(p. 25) to gain control over their future (Fig. G) energy-momentum
and angular momentum, until all balls can be tunneled/teleported at
the desired location, perhaps like the ‘gimbal’ shown at p. 19.

Now replace the ball in Fig. F with a grain of rice, and all rice in the
left jar in Fig. H can “tunnel” into the empty jar at right, nice’n easy.
This is brain-controlled quantum tunneling (p. 26). Not “magic”.

Fig. H. Read about balancing apples at p. 16.

As stated earlier, I have to perform the demonstration under strictly

controlled conditions, at some technical institute or university in EU.
How do we measure the gravitational energy (MTW p. 467) as “apples”?

If you wish to learn more (Q3), follow the steps (1)-(2)-(3) at p. 5 in

explanation.pdf. I will reply within five working days and will send you
the link to my video presentation12. The choice is yours (p. 19).

Addendum 3

Is there anything that can wrap the 3D space en bloc (p. 23)? Physicists
like Ezra Newman (p. 19) disagreed with my proposal for the topology
of spacetime, shown in Fig. E, as if they have any alternative solution.

Let’s see what they can offer. Where is ‘null infinity’ (Chuck Norris)?
 29

Physicists cannot calculate its numerical value (if any), so they use the
notion of ‘sufficiently faraway’. As an illustration, suppose you are
having a BBQ on your terrace. It is a summer day, with air temperature
25 degrees Celsius. You bring your thermometer close to the BBQ and
now it reads 50 degrees Celsius. Then you walk away and measure the
temperature, until it reaches 25 degrees Celsius, say, 5m away from
the BBQ. Likewise, 1090 km is ‘sufficiently faraway’ (5m from the BBQ)
from the Hulse-Taylor pulsar below, courtesy of Bernard Schutz.

Fig. I. For realistic astrophysical sources, read M. Maggiore.

The experts in gravitational wave (GW) astronomy have not calculated

the required separation of GW150914 ‘sufficiently faraway’ from the
Earth to apply their linearized approximation, after assuming that the
dimensionless amplitude (Fig. I) of their GWs is already vanishing
small, e.g., “10-21 or less” (Lisa Goggin). If GW150914 was “by far the
most powerful explosion humans have ever detected except for the big
bang” (Kip Thorne), one can expect that the ‘sufficiently faraway’
distance between GW150914 and Earth will be much greater than 1090
 30

km (Fig. I). Otherwise Kip Thorne and his collaborators may not use the
linearized gravity and have to start from scratch ― read Hans Ohanian
at p. 4, and try to construct a “geodesic” under the perpetual energy
non-conservation due to gravity6. More facts at pp. 1-6 in facts.pdf.

Bottom line here is the tantalizing problem of ‘unending something’:

read Stephen Leacock on p. 23. The story with the BBQ on p. 29 cannot
solve it. Can you suggest some numerical value of “near” infinity, after
Roger Penrose? If you cannot, see the topology of spacetime in Fig. E.
The infinity does exist in 4+0 D spacetime, as it provides numerically
finite yet physically unattainable “boundaries” of the 4D partition of
the Universe. Take for example the Beginning at Time zero, denoted A
in the continuum of geometric points below (Fig. J).

Fig. J. See Fig. E.

The closed interval [BC] has a numerically finite value matching the
increasing cosmological age viz. the increasing radius of the inflating
“balloon” (Slide 2). But to we define [BC], the Beginning at Time zero
(A) must disappear: BC = AC – AB. If (AB] is an infinitesimally ( )
“running” half-closed interval, B can never reach A and stop there.
Hence the Beginning at Time zero and the End at Time infinity are
always present in the Platonic world, which leads to physical theology.

If you wish to learn more about Time (Fig. 7), follow steps (1)-(2)-(3)
at p. 5 in explanation.pdf. I will reply by suggesting new physics and
new Mathematics (Q2). In one sentence, Nature is smarter (5.5.1).

Alternatively, you may wish to explore the current hypotheses of GWs,

according to which the GW in Fig. I is made of hypothetical gravitons,
as explained by Kip Thorne in his Slides 3 and 4. Nobody has detected
them, nor has suggest some perturbative quantum gravity based on
gravitons as ‘messenger particles’. Moreover, GW150914 — “the most
powerful explosion humans have ever detected except for the big
bang” (Kip Thorne) — was totally silent, because “a vacuum BBH
merger does not produce any EM or particle emission whatsoever”
(LIGO, p. 9 in arXiv:1602.08492v4). It just can’t. It’s a vacuum ghost.
 31

We know nothing about the wave pattern of very strong GWs in the
immediate vicinity (M. Maggiore) of GW150914, but the GW experts
believe that the same totally unknown (Sic!) pattern was absolutely
not (Sic!) altered due to non-linear interactions (MTW p. 968) for one
billion years, before being detected on 14 September 2015. Otherwise
LIGO will be totally useless, as it cannot detect any non-linear GW.

The only thing GW experts know for sure is that GW gravitons are very
easy to produce, as explained eloquently by the Nobel Laureate Kip
Thorne and father of GW astronomy in his ‘Gravitational Waves and
Experimental Tests of General Relativity’ from 7.09.2012, pp. 31-32:

Exercise 27.8 Problem: Gravitational waves from arm waving

Wave your arms rapidly and thereby try to generate gravitational

waves.

(a) Compute in order of magnitude, using classical general

relativity, the wavelength of the waves you generate and their
dimensionless amplitude at a distance of one wavelength away
from you.

(b) How many gravitons do you produce per second?

Fascinating experiment, straight from the horse’s mouth. I strongly

recommended it to all GW experts in arXiv:2103.08520 [gr-qc]. If they
are too lazy to wave their arms “rapidly” and “generate gravitational
waves”, surely they can compute, using “classical general relativity”,
how many “gravitons” are produced by an average Hummingbird.

Anyway. The only merit of GW parapsychology is to show how careless

are today’s theoretical physicists about the self-acting origin of gravity
(Fig. 3). Will leave them and Kip Thorne to simmer in their own sauce.

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to many theoretical physicists for their invaluable (albeit

unintended) support, most notably to Ezra Newman and his colleagues
for showing in June 1972 the wrong theory of gravitational radiation.

23 September 2021, 11:50 GMT

Gmail - How many gravitons are produced by an average Hummingbird? https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=549658db66&view=pt&search=all...

Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]>

How many gravitons are produced by an average Hummingbird?

Dimi Chakalov <[email protected]> Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 1:52 AM
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
muenchen.de, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
hannover.de, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]

Read the experiment by Kip Thorne at p. 31 (last) in

http://www.god-does-not-play-dice.net/SE.pdf

D. Chakalov
chakalov.net

1 of 1 09/21/2021, 01:52