100% found this document useful (1 vote)
224 views2 pages

Historical Criticism Learning Activity RIPH

This document summarizes and compares the historical sources of Monteclaro's Maragtas and Marco's contributions. It outlines the background of each source, the external and internal criticism techniques used to analyze them, and the findings and conclusions of the analyses. Monteclaro's Maragtas is considered a potential forgery or hoax due to similarities to Panay folktales. Meanwhile, Marco provided many historical documents but their authenticity is questioned by some historians due to mysteries in his life.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
224 views2 pages

Historical Criticism Learning Activity RIPH

This document summarizes and compares the historical sources of Monteclaro's Maragtas and Marco's contributions. It outlines the background of each source, the external and internal criticism techniques used to analyze them, and the findings and conclusions of the analyses. Monteclaro's Maragtas is considered a potential forgery or hoax due to similarities to Panay folktales. Meanwhile, Marco provided many historical documents but their authenticity is questioned by some historians due to mysteries in his life.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Historical Sources

Historical Criticism
Monteclaro’s Maragtas Contribution of Marco

Monteclaro: Marco:
Background of the person or
persons where the material - Born in Miag-ao, Iloilo -Born in Marayo, Negros; now
originated Pontevedra

External criticism technique


used -Provenance -Provenance

-wrote Code of Rajah


-copy taken from a bamboo Kalantiaw (1433)
Findings tube
-has many historical document
-the paper was too brittle writings, but many historians
including Scott, Schumacher,
and Viana we’re more focused if
the documents we’re fraudulent

Internal criticism technique


employed -verisimilitude -versimilitude

-very similar with folktales


Findings
from Panay -life was full of mystery
-many contributions, but also
Conclusion -forgery, hoax? many suspicion on the
authenticity of his works

You might also like