0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views36 pages

Sediment Volume Search Sonar

Uploaded by

Mr Bennigan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views36 pages

Sediment Volume Search Sonar

Uploaded by

Mr Bennigan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 36

Sediment Volume Search Sonar

MR-2545
Daniel C. Brown
Applied Research Laboratory at the Pennsylvania State University
In-Progress Review Meeting
17 May 2018
MR-2545: Sediment Volume Search Sonar
Performers:
Applied Research Laboratory – Penn State
Applied Physics Laboratory – Univ. of Washington
Naval Research Laboratory – Stennis Space Center

Technology Focus
• Sonar system design and signal processing for buried UXO imaging
• Focus on very shallow water (< 5 m) using surface craft

Research Objectives
• Determine hardware design and signal processing
strategies for near-field imaging of buried UXO targets

Project Progress and Results


• Phase 1 modeling and simulation effort is completed
• Phase 2 prototype field experiments completed

Technology Transition
• Program goal is the design, demonstration and
documentation of a system capable of
very-shallow-water, buried-UXO imaging 2
Social Media Content
● Journal of the Acoustical Society – Express Letter
● “A simple model for computing acoustic scattering from the
seafloor: Researchers at the Applied Research Laboratory at the
Pennsylvania State University have developed a simple model for
simulation of acoustic scattering from the seafloor. This model utilizes an
approach that is well suited to high-speed parallel implementation on
general purpose graphics processors.” http://doi.org/10.1121/1.4976584
● SAGEEP 2018 – Presentation
● “Researchers at the Applied Research Laboratory at the Pennsylvania
State University presented their work on a sensor designed to map
buried unexploded ordnance using a sonar system. This sensor uses a
novel form of synthetic aperture processing to make three-dimensional
images of buried objects.”

3
Social Media Content
● IEEE Oceans Charleston – Presentation/Paper
● “Successful demonstration of prototype sensors for munitions
mapping: Researchers at the Applied Research Laboratory at the
Pennsylvania State University have recently conducted experiments to
map buried ordnance using a novel form of synthetic aperture sonar.”
Link to paper when available.

4
Project Team and Collaborators

● Applied Research Laboratory – Penn State


 Dr. Daniel Brown, PI
 Dr. Shawn Johnson, Co-PI
 Mr. Cale Brownstead, Co-PI
 Mr. Zack Lowe, Lead Engineer

● Applied Physics Laboratory – University of Washington


 Dr. Aubrey Espana, PI
 Dr. Steve Kargl, Co-PI

● Naval Research Laboratory – Stennis Space Center


 Dr. Joseph Calantoni, PI
 Mr. Edward Braithwaite, Lead Engineer
5
Problem Statement

● A capability gap exists for the detailed survey of UXO in very


shallow water (1-5 meters depth)
 The potential for human/UXO interaction is high in these shallow
environments that make up a large fraction of SERDPs sites
 Current COTS acoustic sensors and platforms are not well suited to
conducting surveys in these water depths

NAS
Pax
River

Depth In Feet 6
Technical Objective
● The program will simulate, design, fabricate and
demonstrate an acoustic sensor and platform capable of
detailed UXO surveys in 1-5 meters water depth

7
Technical Approach

• Leverage/extend models for producing synthetic sonar data


Phase 1
• Adapt existing signal processing for volumetric imaging
Simulation and
Modeling
• Analyze and quantify expected system performance

• Reconfigure existing test platform and sonar hardware


Phase 2
• Modify signal processing algorithms based on field data analysis
Prototype
Demonstration
• Demonstrate performance for UXO detection

• Purpose-built hardware design based on lessons learned


Phase 3
• Further refinement of signal processing and data visualization
System
Demonstration
• Demonstrate performance for UXO detection

Each phase of the program concludes with a Go/No-Go decision point


8
Phase 1: Simulation and Modeling
Environmental Modeling
● Leverage the Point-based
Sonar Scattering Model
(PoSSM)
● Coherent simulation
accounts for sonar motion,
beam pattern, absorption,
sediment type and
backscattering strength, and
bathymetry
● Produces time series suitable
for SAS beamforming
● SVSS program extended
PoSSM to include volume
scattering / layered
sediments and SVSS sonar
geometry
9
Phase 1: Simulation and Modeling
Target in the Environment Modeling
FE Mesh for 100-mm Aluminum UXO
● Leverage recent collaboration
with APL/UW Target in
Environment Response (TIER)
modeling effort
 Combined finite element and
propagation model for target Water
signatures
● Past SERDP programs
supported TIER model Perfectly Matched Layer
development and validation
● Extend TIER to include bistatic
paths and SVSS sonar geometry R Path 1 R Path 2 R Path 3 R Path 4

● TIER currently supports S T S T S T S T

simulation of a number of UXO


shapes Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment

100-mm aluminum replica of UXO 105-mm bullet-shaped UXO (air-filled) 155-mm howitzer with cap and air-filled

Images courtesy of APL/UW 10


Phase 1: Signal Processing
Backprojection Imaging
● Extend existing synthetic
aperture beamformer
to volumetric imaging
● Requires addressing two
main topics:
 Near-field “field of view”
 Acoustic refraction at
water/sediment boundary

11
Phase 2: Prototype Demonstration
Field Testing
Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoir
● Foster Joseph Sayers
Reservoir
 Flood control
 Drained in late fall
● Winter lake draining permits
UXO-like objects to be
deployed with accurate
ground truth
● Three planned lake trials Fall/Winter
Reservoir Drained
Spring/Summer
Reservoir Filled

 System Integration
 System Functionality
 System Demonstration

12
Phase 3: System Demonstration

● Lessons learned from simulation and prototype


demonstrations will be applied to the fabrication of a
purpose built test platform.
 Hardware leveraged in prototype may not be optimal.
● Potential areas for improvement:
 Receive array design (geometry and acoustic performance)
 Transmit array design (geometry and band of operation)
 Surface craft design (sonar system deployment, onboard power)
● Significant effort on improving signal processing
 Target strength estimation (calibrated spectral response)
 Automated target detection

Completed SERDP-specific sensor/platform and signal processing will


be demonstrated and delivered
13
PHASE 2:
DEMONSTRATION RESULTS

14
SVSS Prototype Sensor Design

● Modeling and simulation


results informed the prototype Sonar Array Schematic

sensor design Sonar


Hardware Projectors Receivers
 Significant leverage of existing
hardware for demonstration
● SVSS program developed a
new array configuration
 Expanded the receiver from 48
channels to 80 channels
 Fabricated six new projectors
● Added a new high-frequency
COTS sidescan sensor

Sound Hunter Test Platform
80 channel receiver Real‐time kinematic GPS Water temperature sensor
6 channel transmitter Fiber optic gyroscopic navigator 40 TB data storage
High‐frequency sidescan Acoustically quiet battery power Gas and electric propulsion
15
Projector Design and Fabrication Challenge
Tonpilz Element

● SVSS requires five


Element Isolation Web
wideband acoustic
projectors Projector Housing

 Intended COTS supplier


declared bankruptcy early in
Phase 2
● ARL designed and
fabricated projectors using
surplus tonpilz elements
● Excellent “front-to-back”
ratio for multipath rejection

16
Prototype Integration and Testing in the
Summer/Fall of 2017
● Hardware changes
 Receive array expanded and reconfigured
 Transmitter expanded
 RTK GPS integrated
● Multiple experiments conducted at the test site
 Early tests focused on debugging
 Later tests focused on survey and imaging of deployed targets
 Sediment samples collected to characterize test environment

Shallow Site Deep Site

17
High-frequency Sidescan Survey

● Commercial sidescan
sonar is used to give an
overview of the test area.
● Boat operator uses real-
time sidescan display to
help guide boat operation
● Follow on effort will
explore how to use this
sensor more effectively

Sidescan data provides environmental characterization and 
some limited capability for larger surface ordnance.
18
Test Site Sediment Characteristics

● Some areas of the test


sites showed a silt layer
(10-15 cm) overlaying a

Silt
clay basement
● Some bioturbation from
fly larvae

Clay

Midge Fly Larvae

19
Sediment Layering in Sub-bottom Profile
Depth [m]

Old 220
Deep Site Road Bed

Distance Traveled [m] 20


Three-dimensional Image Visualization

● SVSS creates three dimensional data


 Imagery consists of voxels (instead of pixels)
● Visualization techniques
 Projections
 Slices
 3D Viewer

21
SVSS Maximum
Intensity Projections
(MIPs)

22
23
SVSS Image Slices

24
Targets Planted
by ARL/PSU

Clutter Recovered
by ARL/PSU

25
Accurate Relative Target Location

26
Measuring Target Dimensions from Imagery
Short Cylinder: L = 30.5 cm Long Cylinder: L = 61.0 cm

27
28
Phase 2 Results Conclusion

● Prototype SVSS sensor was developed leveraging


existing hardware
 Projector fabrication and receive array expansion
● Demonstrations were conducted at the Foster Joseph
Sayers Reservoir test site
 Two “survey” tests conducted in late 2017
● SVSS generated three-dimensional imagery of targets
 11 of 12 cylindrical targets were located in the resulting imagery

Phase 2 testing has demonstrated that the SVSS sensor is 
capable of buried UXO detection in very shallow water.
29
Re-planning Year 1 of Phase 3

● Phase 2 demonstrated the prototype SVSS is capable of


imaging buried targets at the test site
 Projector development pushed testing to late 2017
 Limited dataset precluded a complete SVSS characterization

● ARL/PSU has proposed re-planning the first year of


Phase 3 for expanded testing of the prototype SVSS
 More thorough characterization will improve final system design
 Delaying final system design allows for additional consideration
of potential test sites in the system design
 Additional testing will provide time for scientific studies

30
Early Phase 3 Topics

● Data collection against realistic ordnance


 Several inert UXO were installed in the test site in March 2018
● Enhanced target detection
 Non-linear image normalization techniques are needed to reduce
high-level interface scattering
 Techniques should be developed to exploit elastic phenomena

● Improved sediment characterization


 Sediment cores were collected during March 2018 installation
 Model/data comparisons will be conducted to better understand
the relevant scattering processes

31
Early Phase 3 Topics

● Wideband transmitter study


 Waveform design to best utilize the Phase 2 projectors
 Determine frequency bands for best performance

● Ensuring area coverage / multi-pass data fusion


 Operator displays to guarantee 100% survey area coverage
 Fusion (possibly coherent) of data from multiple passes

32
Action Items

● “Dr. Andrews noted that project will need to re-brief with


the Board in year four of the project since the requested
funds exceed $1M.”
 Type: SAB
 Due Date: 06/16/2019
 Status: PENDING

Year 4 as proposed exceeds $1M, and falls in Phase 3 of


the project after the next go/no-go decision point. We will
continue monitoring this and coordinate with the SAB if
executed as planned.
A re-planned phase 3 will expend less than $1M in year 4
33
Transition Plan

● The program plan is to generate system documentation


and data used for demonstration of capabilities
 Phase 2 and Phase 3 each include a number of field
demonstrations of the SVSS under SERDP funding
 Result of Phase 3 will be a system capable of sub-bottom
imaging of buried UXO

● User community “buy in” will be achieved by open


sharing of documentation and data collected in field
demonstrations

34
BACKUP MATERIAL

35
Publications

● Peer Reviewed Publications


 D.C. Brown, S.F. Johnson and D.R. Olson, “A point-based
scattering model for the incoherent component of the scattered
field”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 141, no. 3, pp. EL210-EL215,
2017
● Conference Publications
 Paper in preparation for IEEE Oceans Conference.
● Presentations
 D.C. Brown, S.F. Johnson and C.F. Brownstead, “Sediment
Volume Search Sonar”, SAGEEP 2018.

36

You might also like