Reference To The Association of Phonolite On Nepheline-Rocks in Brazil, With Special
Reference To The Association of Phonolite On Nepheline-Rocks in Brazil, With Special
Notes
N ~ P H I ~ L I N E - I ~ 0 C K S IIff B R A Z I L , 459
BO ~I~R. O. A. D:ERBY ON
N E P H E L I N E - R O C K S IN BRAZIL. 463
9m.
464 ~ . o. A. n~BY o~
466 m ~ . Oo A. DERBY ON
the red rock at a low angle. The tunnel, which describes a strong
curve, soon enters wholly into the foyaite, which appears in the
floor, roof, and sides ; but a few metres beyond, the red rock appears
again irregularly, still rising highest on the left side when the
exposure is continuous (3), while in front it is divided into three
distinct masses, the foyaite sinking between to below the floor of the
tunnel (4). The road-bed again rises above the level of the lower
Fig. 4.--Sections across and on the sides of the tunnel near Pinhalzinho.
t~ t~ b o'
k
1 2
3
a. Foyaite. b. Red rock.
1. Upper mouth of tunnel
2. Lower mouth of tunnel.
3. Left side of tunnel near upper end.
4. Right side of tunnel near upper end.
contact of the foyaite and the red rock, and continues in the former
to the lower opening, where the latter again appears in very small
patches on each side, which only rise very slightly above the floors.
The foyaite forms quite a regular arch over the lower mouth of the
tunnel (2) ; this comes out at the upper surface of the mass, which is
covered completely by the red rock. The latter is here so broken into
small fragments as to resemble an immense heap of chestnuts, and a
land-slide of this incoherent material had, at the time of my visit,
revealed a considerable surface of the foyaite on the slope over the
mouth of the tunnel. This contact-surface was irregularly undu-
lated, and inclined at an angle of 15~ ~. The rock-openings and
a part of the interior contacts have been concealed by masonry, but
a portion of the latter are still exposed.
Both rocks near the contact are generally decomposed, and the
red rock is everywhere too much so to reveal any modifications that
it may have suffered. I n places, however, the foyaite shows an in-
teresting contact-phenomenon. At about a metre away the rock
becomes finer-grained, an,t passes rapidly into foyaite porphyry and
finally into true phonolite, the phonolitic facies extending for 10-15
Downloaded from http://jgslegacy.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on May 29, 2012
N E P H E L I N ~ R O C K S I N BRAZIL~ 467
468 ~[R. O. A. D E R B Y ON
The larger one (fig. 5), which is 9 inches long and 4 inches wide,.
is a blue phonolit,e, with tolerably abundant, crystalline inclusions in
the lef%-hand port,ion, which become rarer towards the right. On
the left side there is also a long, curved, ribbon-like inclusion of
foyaite, which shades off at the lower end into the including rock
through a group of scattered crystals, such as are common in phono-
lite. The other one (fig. 6), which is about 4 inches long, is repre-
sented above as it, appears on an irregularly fractured surface. The
dark-shaded portion is felsit,ic, and may, I think, be considered as
phonolite, notwithstanding its abundant, crystalline inclusions. I t
forms a distinct, sheath, sharply defined against the enclosing foyaite,
about, the whole inclusion, and also about, the three principal
crystalline masses imbedded in it in the lower part of the mass.
It appears, however, to shade into these, and into the smaller and
less-defined inclusions of the upper part. These masses differ con-
siderably in aspect, from the enclosing foyaite, and are flecked with
small dark patches apparently related to the felsitic mass. As
the specimen has been placed in the hands of Prof. t~osenbusch, no~
further description of it will be attempted here, as, for my present
purpose, it, is sufficient to signalize the double nature of the inclusion,
that is to say, of a rock of granitic texture in one of felsitic character,
which is itself enclosed in a rock of granitic type. The appearance
of this and other inclusions, coupled with the facts already stated,
as to t,he occurrence of phonolite as a peripheral facies of foyaite, lead
me to regard the inclusions, whether in t,he one or the other of the
rocks, as parts of the same original magma. A petrographical exam-
ination will doubtless determine whether this view is correct or not.
From the cutting in foyaite, above mentioned, to the Cascara
station the road winds for abou~ a kilomet,re around a prominent
spur, some 400 metres wide, of bluish-black and greenish tuff, which
Downloaded from http://jgslegacy.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on May 29, 2012
I~EPHELINE-I~OCES IN B E A Z I L 469
metres above the general level. Similar but shorter detached ridges
(the Serra do Caraeol and Serra de Caldas) to the southward and
,eastward appear to complete an approximately circular or elliptical
enclosure (fig. 7). This circular arrangement of the higher ridges
is peculiar, and, taken in connexion with the character of the pre-
dominant rocks of the plateau and of the bounding ridges, as far as
,examined, is probably not without significance.
Fig. 7.mSketch Map of the Caldas region.
4" "~
>
12'00B
,seuL'~ \
:,~,z (,o~,,,.)
Serra d~ Caracol
472 ~. o. A. I m R , ~ O~
~[ar and ~Iantiqueira in the valley of the Parahiba ; but these are
.certainly newer than the eruptions of similar material of Itatiaia.
Unfortunately the other localities mentioned in this paper afford no
prospect of throwing light on the geological age of the nepheline-
rocks, as there are no sedimentary beds in their vicinity interme-
diate between the gneiss and the recent deposits. They promise,
however, to give important results on the relations of various types
of eruptive rocks(and it is hoped that an opportunity will soon be
afforded for examining and describing them more fully.
Dlscusslo~.
The P~SIDE~T said it was seldom that a paper containing such
important facts was presented to the Society. I t was reserved to
Mr. Derby to have proved that plutonic rocks containing nepheline
(foyaite) passed into volcanic masses which were true phonolites.
This Mr. Derby had clearly established by observations in the field.
He had also shown that leucite existed in rocks of palveozoic age,
thus rendering untenable the last stronghold of those who insisted
on making geological age a primary factor in petrographical classi-
fication. He alluded also to the value of the independent determi-
nations of Profi Rosenbusch.
Mr. BAV~R~A~ had been over portions of the ground with the
Author, and was glad to add his testimony to the value of the
paper. He spoke of the importance, in a geological sense, of these
generalizations. I t was remarkable how highly crystalline masses
of rock pass over into a sort of phonolite. These were associated
with paheozoie masses, which were pre-Permian or at least pre-
Triassic. He alluded to the difficulty of investigating Fernando
Noronha, and also to the difficulties attendant upon the investigation
o f rocks in Brazil, which were subject to such an enormous amount
of local alteration.
Profi B o ~ w z also expressed his sense of the value of the paper.
He alluded to the comparative rarity of nepheline- and leucite-rocks,
and to the confusion in the nomenclature. H e was reminded of the
nepheline-rocks near ~ontrea], where dolerite was broken through
by nepheline-syenite, associated with tephrites and phonolites.
Although there might be a doubt here, these rocks were most pro-
bably of Silurian age; but the evidence in Brazil was still clearer
as to the .~al~eozoic age, and he believed that, in the case of some
other masses, the evidence had satisfied the Canadian geologists.
He alluded also to the nepheline-roeks in the Katzen-Buckel, where
there was a similar passage from coarse-grained to fine-grained.
Dr. ]=[ATc~ said that in this case leucite was clearly shown to be of
almozoic age, and he regarded the paper as a step towards the better
assification of this group of rocks.
Profi Sw~n~r asked for evidence as to the identification of the
leucite.
The P ~ S I D ~ T thought there was no possibility of mistake in
this respect. As regards the rocks of the Katzen-Buekel, none
were truly holocrystalline, and hence they could not be Compared
with foyaite or elzeolite-syenite.