LLM Dissretation Synopsis 27 FEB
LLM Dissretation Synopsis 27 FEB
Submitted To:
Shalini
ENROLLMENT NO:A8101820236
( Constitutional law)
1
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Expressing gratitude is a pleasant but difficult job when one sincerely tries to put them in words. To
list them all is not practicable, even to repay them in words is beyond the domain of my lexicon.
I am highly indebted to Dr. Axita Srivastava mam, our Professor and Guide of the Dissertation for
firstly, allowing me to take this topic just on the ground that I have interest in the topic, secondly, for
providing me outstanding assistance at every step of my preparation of this project. I am extremely
thankful to her for her constructive criticism and helpful suggestions. Her constant encouragement
helped me to work harder.
I would also in cryptic gratitude toward my parents who ensure my capabilities and raise my
confidence, also maintain mental and physical balance
2
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
INTRODUCTION -
The issue of delegated legislation has been one of the most debated issues in the domain
of legal theory because of its various implications. Scholars have consistently presented differing
and even contradicting views about delegation of power to legislate and have thus taken different
stands on the issue. While Delegated Legislation has been a widespread practice in modern times
and is almost an accepted norm, there have been contrary views. For instance Cooley has
expressed a staunchly critical view of the power to delegate. He has stated that "One of the
settled maxims in constitutional law is that the power conferred upon the legislature to make
laws cannot be delegated by that department to any other body or authority.
Where the sovereign power of the State has located the authority, there it must remain;
and by the constitutional agency alone the laws must be made until the constitution itself is
changed. The power to whose judgment, wisdom, and patriotism this high prerogative has been
entrusted cannot relieve itself of the responsibility by choosing other agencies upon which the
power shall be devolved, nor can it substitute the judgment, wisdom, and patriotism of any other
body for those to which alone the people have seen fit to confide this sovereign trust." Further he
has also observed that "No legislative body can delegate to another department of the
government, or to any other authority, the power, either generally or specially, to enact laws. The
reason is found in the very existence of its own powers. This high prerogative has been entrusted
to its own wisdom, judgment, and patriotism, and not to those of other persons, and it will act
ultra vires if it undertakes to delegate the trust, instead of executing it." While such positions do
raise the questions about the propriety of delegating the power to legislate by higher legislative
bodies to the lower ones, the fact remains that this has been a general practice followed in all
modern democratic countries. Hence it is important to understand what is firstly meant by
delegated legislation and then analyse its various aspects.
3
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
AIM
This project aims to critically analyse the current Delegated Legislation and its judicial control.
AIMS:
HYPOTHESIS
The main question, in today’s scenario, is not whether delegated legislation is desirable or not, but
what controls and safeguards can be introduced so that the conferment of legislative power on the
Administration by the Legislature is not abused or misapplied. Therefore, my dissertation, firstly,
seeks to evaluate the various controls that are laid down over delegated legislation in India. Since, it
is the Legislature which delegated legislative power to the Administration, the , secondly, explores
how it is the legislature’s primary responsibility to supervise and control the actual exercise of this
power, ensuring it is not used objectionably by the Administration. Thirdly, the dissertation highlights
the validity of delegated legislation with respect to Judicial Control or Judicial Review and how the
courts have to see whether the power delegated is within the ambit of the constitution. Lastly, puts
into perspective the various issues with regard to Delegated Legislation and recommends solutions
for the same.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
NATURE OF RESEARCH
4
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
Analytical, Perspective, Critical and Descriptive Research. The research has been based upon the
various laws . A much critical and analytical research has opened the scope of perspective and
descriptive methodology to be employed.
LIMITATIONS OF RESEARCH
The only limitation is that there is not much printed literature available on this topic and i have to
study most of the things form online resources. I wanted to know more about Indian perspective on
this issue but as it is a vast topic .
CHAPTERISATION
CHAPTER -1
Meaning, Nature, Scope And Development Of Delegated Legislation
I. Introduction
II. Definitions
III. Scope of delegated legislation
IV. Types of delegation of legislative power in india
V. Essential characteristics of delegated legislation
VI. The need for delegated legislation
VII. Advantages of delegated legislation
VIII. Delegated legislation as distinguished from administrative power
IX. Sub-delegation
X. Merits of delegated legislation
XI. Demerits of delegated legislation
CHAPTER - 2
Causes of Growth of Delegated Legislation
I. Pressure upon Parliamentary time
II. Technicality
III. Flexibility
IV. Experimentation
V. Emergency
VI. Confidential matters
VII. Complexity of modern administration
5
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
CHAPTER - 4
Restraints On Delegation of Legislative Power
I. Excessive Delegation : Permissible Limits
II. Classification of Delegated Legislation
III. Impermissible Delegation
a) Amplification of policy
b) Modification
Removal of difficulties
c)
Inclusion and Exclusion
d)
Taxation
e)
CHAPTER –5
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DL AMONG ENGLAND, USA AND INDIA
I. ENGLAND
II. U.S.A.
III. INDIA
CHAPTER – 6
Judicial Control over Delegated Legislation
I. Doctrine of ultra vires
II. Circumstances
I. Delegated legislation in conflict with the parent act
II.
Delegated legislation in excess of the power conferred by the parent act
III.
Where delegated legislation is ultra vires the parent act
IV.
Where delegated legislation is ultra vires the constitution
6
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
CHAPTER-8: CONCLUSION
7
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Kumar, Narender; Nature and Concepts of Administrative Law, 1st Ed., Allahabad Law
Agency, Faridabad, 2011.
Meaning of delegated legislation
2. Wade, H.W.R. & Forsyth, C.F.; Administrative Law, 9th Ed., Oxford University Press,
New Delhi, 2006.
8
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
6. Control and safeguards : CK Takwani As the rule making power are conferred on the
administration and to keep acheck wheather it is misused by the authority or misapplied .
therefore,control over delegated legislation and various circumstances through which it is
tried to keep control effective.
CONCLUSION
The case has materially contributed in the development of the concept of delegated legislation by
clarifying certain areas of confusion. One of it was laying down that British model of Delegated
Legislation cannot be implemented in India because of the difference of Constitution. Moreover, it
laid down that delegation is possible and necessary due to increase in burden on the legislature and
increase in administrative activities. This cleared the confusion of conditional delegation and
delegation. This case increased the scope of the delegated legislation to the extent of ancillary powers
i.e. non abdication of own power and non-transferring of main and essential functions. Majority
judges were in favour of delegated legislation except Mahajan J and Kania CJ who was emphasizing
more on the conditional 1 2 3 4 5 delegation. As the opposite Counsel built on the argument of Sepration
of power and the concept of non potest delegare, the court observed that separation of power is not a
part of Indian constitution. Courts are clear on the status of delegated legislation being allowed. 6 The
only question in courts regarding such cases is that whether the power delegated is excessive or
within the ambit of the parent act.
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
“DELEGATED LEGISLATION & ITS JUDICIAL CONTROL : AN ANALYTICAL STUDY”
10