11.utilization of Demolished Concrete Waste For New Construction
11.utilization of Demolished Concrete Waste For New Construction
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013
demolished waste materials in order to reduce construction cost and of demolition waste in the Netherlands revealed that 20% of
resolving housing problems faced by the low income communities of
the wood, 90% of the steel and 100% of other metals like zinc,
the world. The crushed demolished concrete wastes is segregated by
sieving to obtain required sizes of aggregate, several tests were lead and copper are being removed from the structure, leaving
conducted to determine the aggregate properties before recycling it behind building waste, which on the average is composed of:
into new concrete. This research shows that the recycled aggregate
that are obtained from site make good quality concrete. The Brickwork 62% Concrete rubble 24%
compressive strength test results of partial replacement and full Brick rubble 6.1% Tiles 2.3%
recycled aggregate concrete and are found to be higher than the Bituminous materials 0.2% Wood 4.7%
compressive strength of normal concrete with new aggregate.
Scrap steel 0.1% Other 0.6%
Keywords—Demolished, concrete waste, recycle, new concrete, Total 100%
fresh coarse aggregate.
Although the volume of demolition waste is huge, much of
I. INTRODUCTION it is inert, allowing it to be crushed, processed, and reused as
aggregate in building works. Nevertheless, large amounts still
I NCREASED concern for environmental protection and for
promotion of the principles of sustainable development has
led some governments to introduce legislation to encourage
end up as landfill rather than being recycled. Waste containing
half-used paint pots, discarded solutions, solvents and
chemicals are potentially hazardous, and building waste likely
the use of recycled aggregates. A favored method is to lower
to be contaminated with asbestos must also be treated as
the selling price of recycled aggregates in relation to natural
dangerous [2].
aggregate, and this is largely achieved by increasing landfill
It has been established that materials and components
costs. Demolition sites and restoration schemes are sources of
recovered from demolished buildings are being reused for new
large amounts of solid waste, which today is being used as
construction works as well as renovation projects, especially
mere landfill. On the other hand, building practices are such
by low-income communities in developing countries. It has
that reusable materials also become mixed with rubble, stone
also been noted that material, which was not considered
and soil, reducing their value and making recycling difficult or
worthy of re-use a few years ago, has appeared in the market
uneconomical. This waste material too, is rendered suitable
after the recent global economic crisis. For example, steel
only as infill for construction work, or as landfill. A Building
reinforcement from demolished buildings used to be recycled
waste recycling as aggregates is a modern approach for
back into steel; however, it is now considered worthwhile to
preventing environmental pollution through both reducing the
adopt measures to facilitate its reuse as a building material.
stocks of waste and decreasing the use of natural aggregates.
Meanwhile, demolition contractors have also become
The reuse of building waste is a relatively new issue for the
increasingly aware of the feasibility of recovering as much
world despite the existing considerable quantity of building
material as possible, for new construction works.
Consequently, they are giving considerable importance to the
proper sorting, storing and display of their wares. Rapid
Asif Husain, Associate Professor, is with Civil Engineering Department, industrial development causes serious problems all over the
College of Engineering & Islamic Architecture, Umm al Qura University,
Makkak, KSA (phone: 00966-595420785; e-mail: [email protected] and world such as depletion of natural aggregates and creates
[email protected]). enormous amount of waste materials from construction and
Majid Matouq Assas, Associate Professor, is with Civil Engineering demolition activities. One of the ways to reduce these
Department, College of Engineering & Islamic Architecture, Umm al Qura
University, Makkak, KSA (phone: 00966-504633633; e-mail: problems is to utilize recycled aggregate in the new
[email protected]). construction concrete components [3].
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(1) 2013 37 scholar.waset.org/1999.3/8588
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013
experimental work has been carried out in the 80’s to available coarse sand has been used as fine aggregate. Locally
investigate the properties of recycled aggregate concrete by [7, available crushed stone aggregate has been used of size from
8] and several other researchers. United States of America [8] 4.75 to 20 mm throughout the experimental study. Potable
currently used the 2.7 billion metric tons of aggregate water is used for concrete mix and curing. Water cement ratios
approximately, the pavements account for 10–15%, whereas 0.60, 0.625 and 0.65 have been used throughout the
other road construction and maintenance work consumes experiments.
another 20–30%, and the bulk of about 60–70% aggregates are 1. Water Absorption
used in structural concrete. Recycled aggregate in the US is
Table I shows the results of absorption capacity of
produced by natural aggregate producers, contractors and
aggregate at different percentage respectively, indicate the
debris recycling centers, which have a share of 50%, 36% and
recycled aggregate showed higher water absorption than
14%, respectively.
conventional concretes. It may be concluded that the water
In some countries, many technologies for recycling concrete
absorption of coarse recycled aggregates is much higher than
wastes have been developed and some recycling specifications
the water absorption of original aggregates. This is due to
have been established as well [8, 9, 10]. In the process of the
higher water absorption of old mortar attached to original
practical reutilization to recycle waste concrete requires
aggregate particles. The porosity of the adhered mortar causes
further breaking and crushing of demolished concrete.
the water to penetrate into the accessible pores and leads to an
Generally, two typical grades of crushed concrete aggregates
increase in the water absorption capacity in comparison with
can be produced and classified by size gradation. One is
crushed aggregate.
coarse recycled concrete aggregates, part of which can be used
in new concrete or road base materials. Other is fine recycled TABLE I
concrete aggregates or recycled mortar from crushed concrete WATER ABSORPTION OF DIFFERENT PERCENTAGE OF RECYCLED & FRESH
waste whose sizes are smaller than 5 mm; recycling, AGGREGATES
evaluation and application of both parts are discussed in
S. No. Material Observed value (%)
different researches [11, 12, 13, 14, 15].
Very little demolished concrete is currently recycled in the country 1. 0% Recycled Aggregate 1.50
(India). Demolished concrete not even used as stabilized base or sub
base in the highway construction. It is being dumped off as fill. It is 2. 25% Recycled Aggregate 2.05
right time to seriously think of reusing demolished concrete for 3. 50% Recycled Aggregate 2.87
the production of recycled concrete in our country. Recycling
would not only conserve the resources but would also promote 4. 75% Recycled Aggregate 3.40
safe and economic use of such concrete which is the need of 5. 100% Recycled Aggregate 4.60
the hour for a country like Saudi Arabia and India.
B. Experimental Techniques 2. Sieve Analysis Test of Aggregates
Concrete waste has been procured from the demolished site. From the sieve analysis test, the particle size distribution of
The demolished waste was transported, crushed and coarse and fine aggregate has been determined. The test is
segregated. Several tests on segregated concretes were performed by using different size of sieves as standardized by
conducted in the laboratory such as water absorption, sieve IS (Indian Standard) code and then pass aggregate through
analysis, crushing value test, impact value test, and abrasion them and collect different size of particles left over different
test, workability and crushing strength of natural & sieve (Fig. 1).
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(1) 2013 38 scholar.waset.org/1999.3/8588
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013
TABLE II
IMPACT VALUE OF DIFFERENT PERCENTAGE OF RECYCLE & FRESH
100
90
AGGREGATES
80 0 % R .A .
70 2 0 % R .A .
60 S. No. Aggregates Impact Value (%)
c u m u la tiv e % o f
4 0 % R .A .
p a rtic le
50
40 6 0 % R .A .
8 0 % R .A . 1. 100% F.A. 24.67
30
20 1 0 0 % R .A 2. 20% R.A. 31.41
10 3. 40% R.A. 34.74
0 4. 60% R.A. 36.46
0 5 10 15 20 25 5. 80% R.A. 38.74
S ie v e s iz e 6. 100%R.A. 41.17
50 6. Workability
40 34.76 While casting specimens, slump test were carried out to
28.15 30.51
V a lue
0
0 25 50 75 100
R e c y c le d A g g r e g a t e ( % )
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(1) 2013 39 scholar.waset.org/1999.3/8588
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013
120 120 25
110
S trength(N/m m 2)
100 20
90 7days
80 15 Strength(N/mm2)
M 15
S lu m p (m m )
60 60 10 28days
M 20 strength(N/mm2)
40 5
34
26
20 20 17
1 01 0
0 0 50 100 150
0 25 50 75 100 Recycled Aggregate(%)
R e c y c l e d A g g r e g a te (% )
75
80 Strength (N/mm2) 20
60 7days strength
15 (N/mm2)
40
20 10 10 28days strength
(N/mm2)
0 5
0 % R.A 25% R.A. 50% R. A. 75% R.A. 100 %
0
R.A.
%age Aggregates 0 50 100 150
Recycled Aggregate (%)
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(1) 2013 40 scholar.waset.org/1999.3/8588
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013
standard tests were carried out using recycled aggregate such resulting from production of aggregates (dust pollution) and
as water absorption, sieve analysis, impact value, abrasion transportation of aggregate from mining to consumption point
value, crushing value, workability and compressive strength of (vehicular pollution).
the mixes using 150mm standard cubes. The study suggested 8. Thus, study shows that dismantled concrete is not solid
the use of alternative material (demolished or recycled waste) waste but useful material to be recycled to prepare fresh
for new construction which is beleaguered with normal waste concrete, which saves the cement and make the concrete
in terms of debris, dust, rubbish etc. in place of conventional economical.
material. Tests were conducted by using 0%, 25%, 50%,
75%, 100% replacement of fresh aggregate with recycled IV. REFERENCES
aggregate to determine the physical and mechanical [1] Kriejger, P.C. (ed.) and Adhesion, Problems in the Re-Cycling of
properties. Concrete, New York: Plenum Press, 1981, pp. 1-20.
[2] McHarry, J., Reuse, Repair, Recycle: A Mine of Creative Ideas for
The following conclusions are drawn on the basis of this Thrifty Living, London: Gaia Books, Ltd., 1993, pp. 110-117.
study: [3] Khalaf FM and DeVenny AlanS, Recycling of demolished masonry
1. Water absorption increases from 1.5% (for 100% fresh rubble as coarse aggregate in Concrete review, ASCE J Material Civil
new aggregate) to 4.6% (for 100% dismantled aggregate) Eng (2004), pp. 331-340.
[4] Kawano H., The state of using by-products in concrete in Japan and
which shows (Table I) more requirement of water that is outline of JIS/TR on recycled concrete using recycled aggregate.,
higher w/c ratio for making concrete mix, while large Proceedings of the 1st FIB Congress on recycling, USA, 2003, pp. 245–
International Science Index, Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013 waset.org/Publication/8588
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(1) 2013 41 scholar.waset.org/1999.3/8588
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering Vol:7, No:1, 2013
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 7(1) 2013 42 scholar.waset.org/1999.3/8588