Design of Coupling Enclosures by Michael M. Calistrat
Design of Coupling Enclosures by Michael M. Calistrat
by
Michael M. Calistrat
Director of Engineering
Houston, Texas
and
Robert E. Munyon
Manager, Research and Development
Baltimore, Maryland
ABSTRACT
Michael M. Calistrat has been Direc All flexible shaft couplings must be surrounded by a
tor of Engineering of Boyce Engineering guard, in order to comply with OHSA requirements. For
International, Incorporated, since early turbomachinery applications, this guard is an oil-tight enclo
1985. He received a Master's Degree in sure and the purpose is to trap any oil escaping the machinery
Mechanical Engineering (1951) from the seals.
University of Bucharest, Romania. He When couplings rotate at high speeds in oil-tight enclo
has acquired vast experience in the field sures, they shear the air, and this shearing results in a signifi
of mechanical power transmission. Dur cant heat generation. The temperature of the enclosure, as well
ing his eighteen years as Manager of as the coupling, depends on the amount of air shearing and on
Research and Development of the Power the ability of the enclosure to dissipate the heat. Another
Transmission Division of Koppers Com problem with couplings operating in oil-tight enclosures is that
pany, Incorporated, he developed several new products, in negative pressures are created occasionally in the vicinity of
cluding shaft couplings and special greases, and presented machinery seals, causing oil to be sucked in the enclosure,
numerous papers. Mr. Calistrat has been granted eighteen which is particularly detrimental for gear reducers.
patents. Numerous tests were conducted at Koppers' Power 'frans
He co-authored the Wear Control Handbook, the Plant mission facilities with various types and sizes of couplings,
Engineering Handbook and the Handbook Series on Lubrica operating at various speeds, within enclosures of many config
tion. He has published articles in technical magazines in the urations. Measurements were taken of the coupling and the
USA, Canada and Europe. As a member of ASME, ASLE and enclosure temperatures, pressures in the enclosures, and the
AST M, he is very active in various committees, and was cooling effect of air flow and oil spray.
Chairman of the International Power Transmission and Gear Formulas useful in calculating enclosure temperatures are
ing Conference (Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984). Before presented. Design guides for fabricating enclosures which
emigrating to the USA, Mr. Calistrat worked in designing operate at acceptable temperatures are also produced. En
drilling equipment for the Romanian oil fields, including the closures fabricated using these guidelines are successfully
first hydrostatic drive for rotary tables. operating in petrochemical plants.
51
52
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH TURBOMACHINERY SYMPOSIUM
Q G
major problem. In most cases, their design was assigned to a
junior engineer.
When the first "dry" couplings were installed in oil tight
n n
enclosures, it was discovered that these enclosures can become
very hot. It also became evident that the oil flow to the gear Figure 1. Air Flow in Enclosures.
type couplings had not only lubricated the coupling, but also
cooled it. Hence, the oil lines were reconnected and dry coupling can be estimated. The following equations, based on
couplings were being cooled with an oil spray. The manufactur experimental results, are being suggested: (Note: All dimen
ers of dry couplings then rushed back to the drawing board to sions are in inches, all temperatures are in F�)
study the heat problem and how to eliminate it.
K1=
(
Shaft temperature
Enclosure Diameter 0·27 )
conducted in the Research Laboratories of Koppers' Power Maximum Cooling Diameter (2)
'fransmission Division, with a variety of couplings at various
conditions. Based on the results obtained, the following expla
nation is being offered for the heat generated in coupling (3)
enclosures.
2.(21
DISSIPATING THE HEAT
Radiation 1.5
.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .s 7 .s .s 1.(21
sure large, or by adding radiating fins. .
other hot components, such as turbine exhausts and steam Figure 2. Oil Spray Cooling.
lines.
Sizing the Air Ports
Oil Cooling
The exhaust port should be tangential to the enclosure's
If the enclosure cannot be modified, and its temperature is outside diameter and directed with the coupling rotation, as
unacceptably high, spraying the coupling or the inside surface shown in Figure 3. This port (or ports) can have any profile;
of the enclosure with oil will dissipate additional heat. however, a tubular port is the most convenient to use. The
To determine the temperature drop that can be obtained larger the port, in comparison with the enclosure, the lower
with oil cooling, the following equations are suggested: the enclosure's temperature. A large exhaust port, on the other
hand, can create problems in separating the oil from the air.
(6)
(7)
where
K5 is an experimental coefficient, found in Figure 2
Te is the enclosure's temperature
T is the cooling oil temperature
0
(8)
(10)
While� cannot have a value larger than 0.6 (in case of no air
f low), a properly designed enclosure will have �=0.1 to 0.2.
The enclosure skin area is:
(13)
where
De= enclosure diameter
Le=enclosure length
Note that the rotational speed has a larger influence on
temperature when the enclosure is air cooled than when no air
circulation is permitted. The larger exponent for speed can be
explained by the fact that a vented enclosure acts to some
extent as an inefficient blower. However, considering the
significant reduction in the value of K4, the increase in the
influence of rotational speed is not very important.
The intake and exhaust ports should be placed so that no
"dead zone" is left in the enclosure. Hence, if one exhaust port
is placed in the middle of the enclosure's length, one intake
port should be used at each end of the enclosure. Conversely, if Figure 4. Tangential Intake Port.
two exhaust ports are used (this is desirable for enclosures
longer than 36 in), then one intake port should be placed half
way between the exhaust ports.
The total intake port area should be half the total exhaust
area. For example, if one exhaust port of 3 in diameter is used,
each of the two intake ports should be 1.5 in in diameter.
OIL lOUT
Figure 6. Separation of Oil from Air.
UPPER ENCLOSURE
HALF
TOP
COUPLING
MACHINE
HOUSING
\__ BOTTOM
EXPERIMENTAL WORK differs from test results (Figure 13), when a single diaphragm
coupling with 34 in shaft separation was used in two different
Tests were conducted over the last four years on gear,
enclosures, having 20 in and 23 in diameters. It can be seen
single diaphragm, and disk-pack couplings designed for 1 V2 in,
that the Bendix equation is very accurate at 5000 cpm, but that
2 in and 4 in diameter shafts. Tests were performed, with and
the exponent for the rotating speed seems to be too large. On
without cooling, at speeds varying between 3000 and 16,000
the other hand, the enclosure's diameter has a larger influence
cpm. The equations presented herein are based on the test
than the one resulting from the Bendix formula. When the
results obtained. These equations reproduce the test results
Bendix formula was used for calculating the temperatures of
with an error of ± 6 percent. The results and calculated tem
gear type, or disk-pack coupling enclosures, the results were
peratures, for two of the couplings which were tested in the
significantly different from measured values, as shown in Fig
la� oratory, are shown in Figure 11.
ure 14. It is evident that the Bendix equation cannot be used
1- on coupling types other than diaphragm couplings. Enclosures
z
w
.... 2121121 with air cooling have been installed at a few chemical plants
(IJ and performed as predicted.
l: 18121
a:
16121 SIZE 4 DIAPHRAGM COUPLING
w
> WITH 34" LONG ENCLOSURE
0 14121
LEGEND BENDIX FORMULA
(IJ
a: 12121 TEST RESULT
- 28121
LL 1121121 LL
260
•
8121
w w 24121
a: 6121 a:
:::> :::> 22121
1- 1-
a: 4121 a:
a: a: 2121121
w 2121 w
a. a. 18121
l: l:
w w
1- 121 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91121 11 12 13 141516 1- 16121
(!) 14121
COUPLING SPEED <RPM/1121121121> z
U) 12121
LEGEND (D ---SIZE 4 COUPLING. NO COOLING 5 1121121 _....
.....
�
I !
40G I
I 18121
c.A.'-ISTR,AT LEGEND 0= TEST POINTS
380 CALCULATED
K 1.7x1tr13d5 N3 v
/ ':jj&URE IL, VALUES. BENDIX
=
DoL
@
/
360 r-- '-l> FORMULA
16121
340 r--
d = Diaphragm 0.0. -Ins.
N = Speed·RPM
Lf"!:>�
Do= Guard 0.0. -Ins. v
320 f-- L = Guard Length-Ins. 14121
_...v
300
/ 120 @
I
280
1- ®
260 / z
w 1121121
/ (IJ
I
240
I l:
a: @
• ®
/ I 8121
•
I I
220 ,.,
L w "
THERMAL >
/ EXPANSION 0
200
® CD
'"""'lf"!"
1/ (IJ
a: 6121 @
180
160
,/
"'"8
FLANGE
d
�
1--
LL
.
4121
CD
140 / 1--
w
a: CD
� �� �
,.,_ �···
:::>
v 1-
20 CD
AIN L ATIO 1-- a:
I
120
a:
w
I I t
a.
I I I I
100
l:
1/ w
1- 0 2 4 6 8 1121 12 14
I
80 I I
I I : I
I I I I
!
! I
COUPLING SPEED <RPM/1121121121>
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
-TEMPER-ATU-RE CALCULATIONS FOR COUPLING HOUSINGS -
K FACTOR Figure 14. Bendix Formula vs. Test Results: Gear-type
Figure 12. Bendix Method. Coupling.
57
DESIGN OF COUPLING ENCLOSURES