Unit 5 Consumer Behaviour: Ordinal Approach: Structure
Unit 5 Consumer Behaviour: Ordinal Approach: Structure
ORDINAL APPROACH
Structure
5.0 Objectives
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Ordinal Utility Approach
5.3 Indifference Curve Analysis
5.3.1 Indifference Schedule
5.3.2 Indifference Curve
5.3.3 Indifference Map
5.3.4 Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution
5.3.5 Properties of Indifference Curve
5.0 OBJECTIVES
After completion of this unit, you will be able to:
• state ordinal utility approach for measurement of utility;
• use Indifference curve analysis to explain consumer behaviour;
• identify shape of Indifference curve in case of perfect substitutes and
complementary goods;
• explain the concept of Budget line;
*Dr. Vijeta Banwari, Assistant Professor in Economics, Maharaja Surajmal Institute, New Delhi.
92
• identify the factors causing shift in Budget line; Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
• describe consumer equilibrium through Indifference curve approach;
• decompose price effect into income effect and substitution effect using
Hicksian and Slutsky approach; and
• derive demand curve from Price Consumption curve (PCC).
5.1 INTRODUCTION
In Unit 4, we have learnt the concept of cardinal and ordinal utility in order to
understand the concept of consumer preferences. We also examined consumer
equilibrium through cardinal utility analysis. As discussed in previous unit,
study of consumer behaviour has been a focus point for researchers as well as
business houses. Consumer behaviour directly affects the sales and thus profits
of the companies. In order to understand consumer’s buying pattern, it is also
important to understand how consumer equilibrium is attained. A rational
consumer wants to maximise his satisfaction derived from consumption of
various goods but is subject to his budget constraint. In this unit, we will
examine the concept of consumer equilibrium using ordinal utility approach.
In above table, five different combinations of Tea and Biscuits are depicted.
All these combinations give equal level of satisfaction i.e. K. The consumer is
indifferent whether he buys 1 cup of tea and 12 biscuits or 2 cups of tea and 8
biscuits. Different schedules can be formed showing different levels of
satisfaction.
94
Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
Fig. 5.2 shows four indifference curves: IC1, IC2, IC3 and IC4. All the points on
IC2 will yield higher satisfaction than the points on IC1 and all the points on
IC3 will yield lesser satisfaction than the points on IC4.
95
Theory of 5.3.4 Law of Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution
Consumer
Behaviour What is Marginal Rate of Substitution?
Marginal rate of substitution may be defined as the rate at which a consumer
will exchange successive units of a commodity for another. In other words,
Marginal rate of substitution is the rate at which, in order to get the additional
units of a commodity, the consumer is willing to sacrifice or give up to get one
additional unit of another commodity.
The Marginal Rate of Substitution can symbolically be represented as under:
MRSxy= ΔY/ΔX
Where MRSxy= Marginal rate of substitution of X for Y
ΔY= Change in ‘Y’ commodity
ΔX= Change in ‘X’ commodity.
Diminishing Marginal rate of Substitution
One of the basic postulates of ordinal utility theory is that Marginal rate of
substitution (MRSxy or MRSyx) decreases. It means that the quantity of a
commodity that a consumer is willing to sacrifice for an additional unit of
another commodity goes on decreasing. Law of diminishing Marginal rate of
substitution is an extensive form of the law of diminishing Marginal Utility. As
discussed in previous section, Law of diminishing marginal Utility states that
as a consumer increases the consumption of a good, his marginal utility goes
on diminishing. Similarly as consumer gets more and more unit of good X, he
is willing to sacrifice less and less units of good Y for each extra unit of X. The
significance of good X in terms of good Y goes on diminishing with each
addition of good X. The law can be understood with the help of following
Table 5.2.
Table 5.2: Marginal rate of Substitution
To have the second combination and yet to be at the same level of satisfaction,
the consumer is ready to forgo 3 units of Y for obtaining an extra unit of X.
The marginal rate of substitution of X for Y is 3:1. The rate of substitution is
units of Y for which one unit of X is a substitute. As the consumer desires to
have additional unit of X, he is willing to give away less and less units of Y so
that the marginal rate of substitution falls from 3:1 to 1:1 in the fourth
combination.
In Fig. 5.3 given below at point M on the Indifference curve I, the consumer is
willing to give up 3 units of Y to get an additional unit of X. Hence, MRSxy =3.
As he moves along the curve from M to N, MRSxy, = 2. When the consumer
96 moves downwards along the indifference curve, he acquires more of X and less
of Y. The amount of Y he is prepared to give up to get additional units of X Consumer Behaviour :
becomes smaller and smaller. Ordinal Approach
The marginal rate of substitution of X for Y (MRSxy) is, in fact, the slope of the
curve at a point on the indifference curve, such as points M, N or P in Fig. 5.3.
Thus MRSxy = ∆Y/∆X
97
Theory of
Consumer
Behaviour
Thus, two Indifference curves cannot intersect with each other. The
Indifference curves cannot be tangent to each other.
4) Higher Indifference curve represents higher level of satisfaction: In
Fig. 5.5, the indifference curve IC2 lies above and to the right of the IC1.
Point C on IC2 represents more units of ‘x’ than point A on IC1.
Similarly, Point B on IC2 represents more units of ‘y’ than point A on
IC1. It is thus evident that higher the indifference curve, the higher the
satisfaction it represents because our consumer prefers more of a good to
less of it. Also note that all the points between B and C on IC2 show
larger amounts of both X and Y compared to point A on IC1.
Perfect Complements
Two goods may be perfect complementary to each other. Just as left and right
shoes, cups and saucers of a tea set etc. In such case, the indifference curve
will be parallel to each other and bent at 90 degree angle or L shaped. Perfect
complementary goods are those goods which are used in fixed ratio i.e. 1:1or
2:2. They cannot be substituted for each other, thus putting MRS as zero. This
99
Theory of case is shown in Fig. 5.7. It is clear that IC1 and IC2 are right angled curves,
Consumer meaning thereby that the consumer buys piece of each right shoe. This will be
Behaviour useless. The consumer will be no better off and he will remain at point ‘A’ on
IC1. In case, he buys 2 pieces of left shoe and only one piece of right shoe, it
will be useless, the consumer will be no better off and he will remain at point C
of IC1. It means that having one more pair of shoe will not add to his
satisfaction. But if he buys one more shoe, his satisfaction will immensely
increase and he will move to point B on higher Indifference curve IC2.
IC3
IC2
IC1
It can be observed from the above table that if the consumer spends his total
income of Rs. 100 on Apples, he is able to buy 10 Apples. On the other hand, if
he buys Oranges alone, he can get 10 Oranges by spending his total income.
Further, a consumer can also buy both the goods in different combinations.
The budget line can be written algebraically as follows:
Algebraic Expression for Budget Set: The consumer can buy any bundle (A,
B), such that:
M ≥ (PX * QX) + (PY * QY)
Where PX and PY denote prices of goods X and Y respectively and M stands
for money income
We can rewrite the budget line as: PYQY = M – PXQX
• ••
dividing both sides by PY yields: QY = • − ••
Q
•
This is because with the increased income the consumer is able to purchase
proportionately larger quantity of both goods than before.
On the other hand, if income of the consumer decreases, prices of both goods
X and Y remaining unchanged, the budget line shifts downward but remains
parallel to the original price line. This is because a lower income will leave the
consumer in a position to buy proportionately smaller quantities of both goods.
Changes in Price of either of the two goods:
Budget Line also shifts when there is change in price of either of the two
goods. Increase in price of any commodity reduces the purchasing power of the
consumer, in turn reducing the quantity demanded. Shift of Budget line due to
change in prices of either good x or good y is presented below:
Changes in Budget Line as a Result of Changes in Price of Good X
Suppose, price of good X rises, the price of good Y and income remaining
unaltered. With higher price of good X, the consumer can purchase smaller
quantity of X.
In Fig. 5.10, original price line is AB. With increase in Price of good X, budget
line will shift to AB2 i.e. consumer will be able to buy less quantity of good X,
quantity of good Y remaining same. Similarly when there is fall in price of
good X, keeping prices of good Y constant, budget line shifts from AB to AB1
i.e. consumer will be able to buy more quantity of good X, quantity of good Y
remaining same.
103
Theory of
Consumer
Behaviour
104
Check Your Progress 2 Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
1) What is budget line? Calculate slope of Budget line if prices of good X
and good Y are 8 and 10 respectively?
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
2) What will happen to budget line if:
Case A: Price of good X increases
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
Case B: Price of good Y decreases
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
Case C: Income of consumer increases
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
• If MRSxy< Px/Py, it means that the consumer is willing to pay less for X
than the price prevailing in the market. It induces the consumer to buys
less of X and more of Y. As a result, MRS rises till it becomes equal to
the ratio of prices and the equilibrium is established.
106
Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
All other points on the budget line to the left or right of point ‘P’ will lie on
lower indifference curves and thus indicate a lower level of satisfaction. As
budget line can be tangent to one and only one indifference curve, consumer
maximises his satisfaction at point P, when both the conditions of consumer’s
equilibrium are satisfied:
i) MRS = Ratio of prices or PX/PY:
At tangency point P, the absolute value of the slope of the indifference curve
(MRS between X and Y) and that of the budget line (price ratio) are same.
Equilibrium cannot be established at any other point such as MRSXY> PX/PY at
all points to the left of point P or MRSXY< PX/PY at all points to the right of
point P. So, equilibrium is established at point P, when MRSXY = PX/PY.
ii) MRS continuously falls:
The second condition is also satisfied at point P as MRS is diminishing at point
P, i.e. IC2 is convex to the origin at point P.
108
Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
It can be observed from Fig. 5.15 that the given budget line BL is tangent to
the indifference curve IC2 at point Q. However, consumer cannot be in
equilibrium at Q since by moving along the given budget line BL he can get on
109
Theory of to higher indifference curves and obtain greater satisfaction than at Q. Thus, by
Consumer moving on higher indifference curve he will reach at extreme point B or point
Behaviour L. In Fig. 5.15, point B is on higher indifference curve. Thus, consumer will be
satisfied at point B where he will buy OB units of commodity Y. It should be
noted that at B the budget line is not tangent to the indifference curve IC5, even
though the consumer is here in equilibrium. It is clear that when a consumer
has concave indifference curves, he will consume only one good.
Corner solution in case of Perfect Substitutes and Perfect Complements:
Another case of corner solution to the consumer’s equilibrium occurs in case of
perfect substitutes. As seen above, indifference curves for perfect substitutes
are linear. In their case tangency or interior solution for consumer’s
equilibrium is not possible since the budget line cannot be tangent to a point of
the straight-line indifference curve of substitutes.
In this case budget line would cut the straight-line indifference curves. Fig.
5.16A presents a case where slope of the budget line BL is greater than the
slope of indifference curves. If the slope of the budget line is greater than the
slope of indifference curves, B would lie on a higher indifference curve than L
and the consumer will buy only Y.
Perfect complements
Another exceptional case of perfect complementary goods is presented in Fig.
110 5.17. Indifference curves of perfect complementary goods have a right-angled
shape. In such a case the equilibrium of the consumer will be determined at the Consumer Behaviour :
corner of indifference curve which just touches the budget line. It can be noted Ordinal Approach
from Fig. 5.17 that in case of perfect complements equilibrium point will be
point C and will be consuming OM of X and ON of Y.
The second type of ICC curve may have a positive slope in the beginning but
become and stay horizontal beyond a certain point when the income of the
consumer continues to increase. In case where X is a superior good and Y is a
necessity, shape of ICC curve will be as shown in Fig. 5.19.
In Fig. 5.19, the ICC curve slopes upwards with the increase in income up to
the equilibrium point R at the budget line P1Q1 on the indifference cure I2.
Beyond this point it becomes horizontal which means that the consumer has
reached the saturation point regarding consumption of good Y. He buys the
same amount of Y (RA) as before despite further increases in his income. It
often happens in the case of a necessity (like salt) whose demand remains the
same even when the income of the consumer continues to increase further.
Here Y is a necessity.
Further, the demand of inferior goods falls, when the income of the consumer
increases beyond a certain level, and he replaces them by superior substitutes.
For example, he may replace coarse grains by wheat or rice, and coarse cloth
by a fine variety. In Fig. 5.20, good X is inferior and Y is a normal good.
It can be observed from the Fig. 5.20, that up to point R the ICC curve has a
positive slope and beyond that it is negatively inclined. The consumer’s
purchases of X fall with the increase in his income.
115
Theory of
Consumer
Behaviour
Fig. 5.24: Decomposition of price effect into income effect and substitution effect through
Compensating variation in Income
It can be observed from Fig. 5.24, that when price of good X falls, budget line
shifts to PL2 i.e. real income of the consumer i.e. he can buy more of both the
goods with his increased income. With the new budget line PL2, consumer is in
equilibrium at point R on a higher indifference curve IC2 and enjoy increased
satisfaction as a result of fall in price of good X.
Suppose, money income of the consumer is reduced by the compensating
variation in income so that he is forced to come back to the original
indifference curve IC1 he would buy more of X since X has now become
117
Theory of relatively cheaper than before. In Fig. 5.24, with the reduction in income by
Consumer compensating variation, budget line will shift to AB which has been drawn
Behaviour parallel to PL2 so that it just touches the indifference curve IC1 on which he
was before the fall in price of X.
Since the price line AB has got the same slope as PL2, it represents the changed
relative prices with X being relatively cheaper than before. Now, X being
relatively cheaper than before, the consumer, in order to maximise his
satisfaction, in the new price income situation substitutes X for Y.
Thus, when the consumer’s money income is reduced by the compensating
variation in income (which is equal to PA in terms of Y or L2B in terms of X),
the consumer moves along the same indifference curve IC1 and substitutes X
for Y. At price line AB, consumer is in equilibrium at S at indifference curve
IC1 and is buying MK more of X in place of Y. This movement from Q to S on
the same indifference curve IC1 represents the substitution effect since it occurs
due to the change in relative prices alone, real income remaining constant.
If the amount of money income which was taken away from him is now given
back to him, he would move from S at indifference curve IC1 to R on a higher
indifference curve IC2. The movement from S at lower indifference curve to R
on a higher in difference curve is the result of income effect. Thus the
movement from Q to R due to price effect can be regarded as having taken
place into two steps first from Q to S as a result of substitution effect and
second from S to R as a result of income effect. Thus, price effect is the
combined result of a substitution effect and an income effect.
In Fig. 5.24 the various effects on the purchases of good X are:
• Price effect = MN
• Substitution effect = MK
• Income effect = KN
• MN = MK+KN or
Price effect = Substitution effect + Income effect
Slusky’s Cost difference approach
In Slutsky’s approach, when the price of good changes and consumer’s real
income or purchasing power increases, the income of the consumer is changed
by the amount equal to the change in its purchasing power which occurs as a
result of the price change. His purchasing power changes by the amount equal
to the change in the price multiplied by the number of units of the good which
the individual used to buy at the old price.
In other words, in Slutsky’s approach, income is reduced or increased (as the
case may be), by the amount which leaves the consumer to be just able to
purchase the same combination of goods, if he so desires, which he was having
at the old price.
That is, the income is changed by the difference between the cost of the
amount of good X purchased at the old price and the cost of purchasing the
same quantity of X at the new price. Income is then said to be changed by the
cost difference. Thus, in Slutsky substitution effect, income is reduced or
118
increased not by compensating variation as in case of the Hicksian substitution Consumer Behaviour :
effect, but, by the cost difference. Ordinal Approach
Initially, with a given money income and the given prices of two goods as
represented by the price line PL, the consumer is in equilibrium at point Q on
the indifference curve IC1 where consumer is buying OM units of good X and
ON units of good Y. Suppose that price of X falls, price of Y and money
income of the consumer remaining constant. As a result of this fall in price of
X, the price line will shift to PL' and the real income or the purchasing power
of the consumer will increase.
In order to identify Slutsky’s substitution effect, consumer’s money income
must be reduced by the cost difference or, in other words, by the amount which
will leave him to be just able to purchase the old combination Q, if he so
desires.
For this, a price line GH parallel to PL' has been drawn which passes through
the point Q. It means that income equal to PG in terms of Y or LH in terms of
X has been taken away from the consumer and as a result he can buy the
combination Q, if he so desires, since Q also lies on the price line GH.
Consumer will not now buy the combination Q since X has now become
relatively cheaper and Y has become relatively dearer than before. The change
in relative prices will induce the consumer to rearrange his purchases of X and
Y. He will substitute X for Y. But in this Slutsky substitution effect, he will not
move along the same indifference curve IC1, since the price line GH, on which
the consumer has to remain due to the new price-income circumstances is
nowhere tangent to the indifference curve IC1.
The price line GH is tangent to the indifference curve IC2 at point S. Therefore,
the consumer will now be in equilibrium at a point S on a higher indifference
curve IC2. This movement from Q to S represents Slutsky substitution effect
according to which the consumer moves not on the same indifference curve,
but from one indifference curve to another.
It is important to note that movement from Q to S as a result of Slutsky
substitution effect is due to the change in relative prices alone, since the effect
119
Theory of due to the gain in the purchasing power has been eliminated by making a
Consumer reduction in money income equal to the cost-difference.
Behaviour
At S, the consumer is buying OK of X and OW of Y; MK of X has been
substituted for NW of Y. Therefore, Slutsky substitution effect on X is the
increase in its quantity purchased by MK and Slutsky substitution effect on Y
is the decrease in its quantity purchased by NW.
120
Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
Money
In most cases, the demand curve of individuals will slope downward to the
right, because as the price of a good falls both the substitution effect and
income effect pull together in increasing the quantity demanded of the good.
Even when the income effect is negative, the demanded curve will slope
downward to the right if the substitution effect is strong enough to overcome
the negative income effect. Only when the negative income effect is powerful
enough to outweigh the substitution effect can the demand curve slope upward
to the right instead of sloping downward to the left.
Deriving Demand Curve for a Giffen Good:
Giffen good is a good where higher price causes an increase in demand
(reversing the usual law of demand). The increase in demand is due to the
income effect of the higher price outweighing the substitution effect. In this
section we will derive the demand curve of a Giffen good.
In Fig. 5.26, demand curve DD in case of a normal good is downward sloping.
There are two reasons behind downward slope: a) income effect b) substitution
effect.
Both the income effect and substitution effect usually work towards increasing
the quantity demanded of the good when its price falls and this makes the
demand curve slope downward. But in case of Giffen good, the demand curve
slopes upward from left to right. This is because in case of a Giffen good,
income effect, which is negative and works in opposite direction to the
substitution effect, outweighs the substitution effect. This results in the fall in
121
Theory of quantity demanded of the Giffen good when its price falls and therefore the
Consumer demand curve of a Giffen good slopes upward from left to right. Fig. 5.27
Behaviour presents the Indifference curves of a Giffen good along with the various budget
lines showing various prices of the good. Price consumption curve of a Giffen
good slopes backward.
It is evident from Fig. 5.27 (the upper portion) that with budget line PL1 (or
price P1) the consumer is in equilibrium at Q1 on the price consumption curve
PCC and is purchasing OM) amount of the good. With the fall in price from P1
to P2 and shifting of budget line from PL1 to PL2, the consumer goes to the
equilibrium position Q3 at which he buys OM2 amount of the good. OM2 is less
than OM1.
Thus, with the fall in price from P1 to P2 the quantity demanded of the good
falls. Likewise, the consumer is in equilibrium at Q3 with price line PL3 and is
purchasing OM at price P3. With this information we can draw the demand
curve, as is done in the lower portion of Fig. 5.26. It can be seen from Fig. 5.27
(lower part) that the demand curve of a Giffen good slopes upward to the right
indicating that the quantity demanded varies directly with the changes in price.
With the rise in price, quantity demanded increases and with the fall in price
quantity demanded decreases.
Check Your Progress 4
1) Differentiate between Hicksian or Compensating Variation approach and
Slutsky Cost difference approach.
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
122
2) How can demand curve be derived from Indifference curve? Consumer Behaviour :
Ordinal Approach
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
5.13 REFERENCES
1) Dwivedi, D.N.(2008) Managerial Economics, 7th edition, Vikas Publishing
House.
2) Dornbusch, Fischer and Startz, Macroeconomics, McGraw Hill, 11th
edition, 2010.
3) Hal R. Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics, a Modern Approach, 8th
edition, W.W. Norton and Company/Affiliated East-West Press (India),
2010.
4) Kumar, Raj and Gupta, Kuldip (2011) Modern Micro Economics: Analysis
and Applications, UDH Publishing House.
5) Samuelson, P & Nordhaus, W. (1st ed. 2010) Economics, McGraw Hill
education.
6) Salvatore, D. (8th rd. 2014) Managerial Economics in a Global economy,
Oxford University Press.
7) http://www.learncbse.in/important-questions-for-class-12-economics-
indifference-curve-indifference-map-and-properties-of-indifference-curve/
8) https://www.businesstopia.net/economics/micro/indifference-curve-
analysis-concept-assumption-and-properties
9) https://www.transtutors.com/homework-help/business-
economics/consumer-theory/satisfaction.aspx
10) http://www.statisticalconsultants.co.nz/blog/utility-functions.html
11) https://businessjargons.com/budget-line.html
123
Theory of 12) http://www.shareyouressays.com/knowledge/8-most-important-properties-
Consumer of-a-budget-line/115699
Behaviour
13) {http://www.econmentor.com/microeconomics-hs/consumers/price-
change-and-the-budget-line/text/772.html#Price change and the budget
line}
14) http://www.learncbse.in/important-questions-for-class-12-economics-
budget-setbudget-line-and-consumer-equilibrium-through-indifference-
curve-analysis-or-ordinal-approach/
15) http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/cardinal-utilitv-analysis/notes-on-
convex-indifference-curves-and-corner-equilibrium/1018
16) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/lncome%E2%80%93consumption curve
17) http://www.vourarticlelibrarv.com/economics/income-effect-substitution-
effect-and-price-effect-on-goods-economics/10757
18) http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/indifference-curves/measuring-the-
substitution-effect-top-2-methods-with-diagram/18290
19) http://www.vourarticlelibrarv.com/economics/income-effect-substitution-
effect-and-price-effect-on-goods-economics/10757
20) http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/cardinal-utilitv-analysis/price-
demand-relationship-normal-inferior-and-giffen-goods/1069
21) http://www.vourarticlelibrary.com/economics/the-slutskv-substitution-
effect-explained/36663
22) http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/cardinal-utilitv-analysis/how-to-
derive-individuals-demand-curve-from-indifference-curve-analysis-with-
diagram/1076