Week 5-6 - Intro
Week 5-6 - Intro
CRIMINOLOGY DEPARTMENT
INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINOLOGY
CRISMARK NALING MARIANO1
I. OBJECTIVES
At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to:
1. Trace the historical background of the different school of thought in Criminology.
2. Explain the school of thought in criminology.
3. Determine who are the unholy three and explain the contribution in the field of criminology?
III. TOPIC
CHAPTER 4
SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN CRIMINOLOGY
School of thought is a term that refers to a group of beliefs or ideas that support a specific theory.
Theory is a set of statements devised to explain behavior, events or phenomenon, especially one that has been
repeatedly tested and widely accepted.
Since the birth of criminology as a body of knowledge in Europe in the 1700s, several schools of
thought have emerged, have been challenged, have been discredited, and have continued to be explored by the
younger generation of criminologist, further proof that criminology is indeed dynamic. However, even before
the formal concepts of criminology were formulated, there already were primitive attempts to explain
criminality.
And for his contributions in the field of criminology, he is credited as being one
of the founders of classical criminology.
The following are Becarria’s ideas regarding crimes and the criminal justice system, as contain in his
treatise, “on Crimes and Punishment”:
“Punishments that go beyond the need of preserving the public safety are in their nature unjust.”
Jeremy Bentham was born on February 15,
1748 in London, England.
Jeremy Bentham’s contribution to classical school of criminology is the concept of utilitarianism and
the felicific calculus.
Utilitarianism is a philosophy which argues that what is right is the one that would cause the greatest
good for the greatest number of people. Others refers to it as the greatest happiness principle, or the principle
of utility. Bentham based his ideas for social and legal reforms to this philosophy. According to him, legislators
should enact laws that benefit the greatest number of people and punishments which measure the pleasures and
pains.
From the philosophy of utilitarianism, Bentham formulated the “felicific calculus” or the pleasure-and-
pain principle. This is a theory that proposes that individuals calculate the consequences of his actions by
weighing the gain or “pleasure” and the suffering or “pain” he would derive from doing the action. If the
pleasure outweighs the pain, then he would most probably proceed to doing the act. But if the possibility of pain
is greater than the pleasure, he would choose not to do it.
Neo-Classical Criminology
One of the flaws of the classical school of criminology is that it does not make any distinction between
adult and child, nor does it consider the position of a mentally-handicapped person. It does not take into account
the mental ability of a child to differentiate between what is right and wrong. In like manner, it does not take
into consideration that an insane person could not appreciate the consequences of his actions by reason of his
mental illness.
The neoclassical theory is a modification of the free will doctrine by stating that certain factors affect
the free will of men and they may either reduce or totally remove accountability on the part of the person who
committed the crime. Some of these factors are incompetence due to insanity or other forms of mental disorders
and abnormalities, physical illness and immaturity due to tender age or minority. All these factors make it
impossible for the individual to exercise free will completely.
Another flaw of the classical school is that it punishes offenders alike, without regard to whether or not
the offender is a first time offender is an accidental offender or a professional offender. This aspect was also
modified by the neoclassical school of criminology.
For almost one hundred years, the classical school of criminology served as the basis of law and justice.
However, in the late 1800’s, the use of scientific methods in studying human behavior started to become
widespread. It was no longer enough to rely on pure thought and reasons. Use of observation and analysis of the
observable were beginning to emerge as the dominant method. This was the beginning of positivism.
Positivism refers to a perspective that believes causes of behavior can be measured and observed.
Significant advances in knowledge of both the physical and social world influenced thinking about
crime. These advances in knowledge changed the study of crimes and criminals into a scientific approach.
There is another school referred to as the Italian school of criminology. It is composed of the three
most important Italian criminologists in history. They were Cesare Lombroso, Enrico Ferri and Raffaelle
Garafalo. Because of their contributions in the propagation of positivist ideas, they were called the HOLY
THREE OF CRIMINOLOGY. However, there were of course, thinkers, philosophers and other criminologist
during their time who opposed their ideas. To them, they were the unholy three of criminology.
1.CESARE LOMBROSO (1835-1909)
However, with the advent of more advanced methods and criminological researches, most of his ideas
are now discredited.
Nevertheless, his early studied revealed new knowledge that was useful in the study of criminality
during his time. He is known for the concept of atavistic stigma, the physical features of creatures at an
earlier stage of development. He claimed that criminals are distinguishable from non-criminals due to the
presence of atavistic stigma and crimes are committed by those who are born with certain recognizable
hereditary traits.
According to his theory, criminals are usually in possession of huge jaws and strong canine teeth; the
arm span of criminals is often greater than their height, just like that of apes that use their forearms to push
themselves along the ground. Other physical stigma include deviation in head size and shape, asymmetry of the
face, excessive dimensions of the jaw and cheekbones, eye defects and peculiarities, ears of unusual size, nose
twisted, upturned or flattened in thieves, or aqualine or beaklike in murderers, fleshy lips, swollen and
protruding, and pouches in the cheek like those of animal’s toes.
Lombroso also devised his own classification of criminals and these are born criminals, insane
criminals and criminaloids.
A person who is in possession of at least five (5) atavistic stigmata is a born criminal. Insane
criminals are those who became criminals because of some brain defect which affected their ability to
understand and differentiate what is right from what is wrong. Criminaloids refer to criminals who do not
possess five (5) atavistic stigmata and who are not suffering from any brain defects. They are habitual criminals,
criminals by passion and others.
In essence, what Lombroso concluded is that criminals are biologically and physical inferior to
conventional, normal, law-abiding citizens.
According to Ferri, a born criminal has a congenital predisposition for crime. An insane criminal is
suffering from some clinical form if mental alienation, A habitual criminal is one who has acquired the habit of
crime mainly through the ineffective measures employed by society for the prevention and repression of crime.
An occasional criminal is one who commits very insignificant criminal acts more because he is led astray by
his conditions of life than because the aggressive energy of a degenerate personality impels him (Ferri,1901).
The passionate criminal is one who commits crime because of passion or revenge
Checked by:
MELODY S. DIMAPILIS
Department Head
Introduction to Criminology | Crismark Naling Mariano Page 6 of 6