Different Kinds of Books
Different Kinds of Books
1. The popular science book (e.g. texts such as those by Oliver Sacks, CarlSagan,
Stephen Jay Gould):These books are extremely easy to read, but they are probably
much more difficult to write than it might seem.
2. The edited collection of previously published papers by the same author:These
books can only be written by well-established authors who want to show their
contribution to the field.
3. The edited collection of previously published papers written by different
authors:These books require much less writing by the editors, and the task is
perhaps made more enjoyable if there are two or more of them who can share the
debate about what to include.
4. The edited collection of original chapters written by several different authors:These
books take longer to produce – not all of the potential authors deliver their chapters
on time.
5. The conference collection: Here many authors are often involved and consequently
there is more room for delay.
6. The handbook: The handbook combines categories 4 and 5. Here, the book is
usually larger and the multiple chapters are original ones (usually reviews), written by
acknowledged experts in the field.
7. The individually authored textbook: This is perhaps the most satisfying kind of book
for an individual to write but it can be a hard slog. It is easier if you have a number of
previous contributions to draw on.
GENERAL PROCEDURES
In order to publish a book, it is useful to think first about an appropriate publisher. Some
publishers will have books on similar topics in their ‘list’, and others won’t. It might be best to
look to the first kind, for they will know the market better. Then it is a good idea to check
these publishers out on the Web.
Many publishers have actual proposal forms on the Web. It is interesting to compare
them, but they are fairly similar. What the publishers require is a synopsis of the text,
probably one or two sample chapters and, sometimes, some indication of the author’s
prowess in the field. What they also require is an estimate of the ‘competition’ and of the size
of the market: in other words, how many books will sell? For a proposal to succeed, the book
‘needs to be of high quality, original, with no or few competitors, have a clearly defined
audience, and promise to be a product (the publisher) can market at a reasonable price’
(Woods, 1998, p. 129).
Haynes (2001) considers the pros and cons of submitting a book proposal to one or more
publishers at the same time. He comes to the conclusion that it is better to submit proposals
to one publisher at a time as:
a) commissioning editors will be annoyed if they find out that you have
sent the proposal to other publishers behind their backs; and
b) feedback from rejected proposals will help to improve the next submission.