Rapid Prototyping (3D Printing) of Small
Wind Turbine Blades
Small Wind Turbines 2016, Vienna
Sean Poole, Russell Phillips
Introduction
Objective: To develop a design and manufacturing
method to rapidly prototype small wind turbine
blades for practical testing.
BLADE DESIGN
DEVELOP CAD
PROCESS CAM
3D PRINT BLADE
REINFORCE PRINTED BLADE
Blade Design
Using BEM theory, a
programme was written
in Labview to design a
turbine blade according
to parameter inputs.
Blade Design
Develop CAD
Process CAM
G-code for 3D printer generated using Repetier-Host
3D Print Blades
Print the turbine blades
(and make a 3D printer)
Reinforce Printed
Blade
4 reinforcement methods
investigated:
1. Pour filled
2. Short fibre infused
3. Pultruded rod reinforced
4. Threaded rod reinforced
Reinforce Printed
Blade
1. Pour Filled
Reinforce Printed
Blade
1. Pour Filled
Advantages:
1. Fast spiral printing (6-12 hours/blade)
2. Saves print material (hollow)
3. Strong print (easily controlled pass rate)
4. Quick reinforcement (mix and pour)
5. Shell could be removed
Reinforce Printed
Blade
1. Pour Filled
Disadvantages:
1. Flatter surfaces warping during printing
2. Exo-therm risk for larger volumes
3. Cracking of shell during water cooling
causes water inside bade
4. Weakest of the processes
5. Unbalancing between blades
Reinforce Printed
Blade
2. Short fibre infused
Reinforce Printed
Blade
2. Short fibre infused
Advantages:
1. Fast spiral printing (6-12 hours/blade)
2. Saves print material (hollow)
3. Strong print (easily controlled pass rate)
4. Strong reinforcement
5. Multidirectional reinforcement
6. Shell could be removed
Reinforce Printed
Blade
2. Short fibre infused
Disadvantages:
1. Flatter surfaces warping during printing
2. Thermal exo-therm risk for larger volumes
3. Fibre displacement during infusion
4. Lack of control of fibre direction
5. Lack of control of fibre density
6. Lack of control of fibre distribution
7. Lack of control of blade volume during infusion
8. Unbalancing between blades
Reinforce Printed
Blade
3. Pultruded rod reinforced
Reinforce Printed
Blade
3. Pultruded rod reinforced
Advantages:
1. Good geometry accuracy (no shell warping)
2. Light weight
3. Very strong blade length strength
4. No exo-therm problems
Effects and
Benefits of
Optimization
3. Pultruded rod reinforced
Disadvantages:
1. Complicated printing (pultruded rods inside
matrix from root to tip)
2. Long print times (12-24 hours)
3. Delicate shell (no reinforcement of profile)
4. Unbalancing between blades
Reinforce Printed
Blade
4. Threaded rod reinforced
Reinforce Printed
Blade
4. Threaded rod reinforced
Advantages:
1. Good geometry accuracy (no shell warping)
2. Light weight
3. Fairly strong blade length strength
4. No exo-therm problems
5. Quick assembly
6. Little manufacturing risk
7. Well balanced
Effects and
Benefits of
Optimization
4. Threaded rod reinforced
Disadvantages:
1. Long print times (12-24 hours)
2. Delicate shell (no reinforcement of profile)
3. CAD model needs to be updated to allow
threaded shaft to be inserted
ORF -
Outdoor Research
Facility
Testing = Happiness
Disaster
Monday - 21 September 2015
Blade Printing
Tuesday –
22 September 2015
New Blade Set – 7
days later
Monday - 28 September 2015
Conclusions and
Future Work
Conclusion:
• Blades work well for practical testing.
• Additive manufacturing can assist with
rapid prototype composite
manufacturing.
• Future work required to make process
more repetitively accurate (geometry
and weight distribution).
• Long term testing required.
• Strength testing required.
• Large (4.5 m ) mould printing.
Current Work –
Larger Machines
Build Size: 1.5 m X 1.5 m X 5.0 m
Current Work -
Plug
Manufacturing
Questions?