List of Psychological Effects
List of Psychological Effects
A list of 'effects' that have been noticed within the field of Psychology.
Effects Descriptions
1 Audience effect Audience effect or Social facilitation is the
tendency for people to perform differently when in
the presence of others than when alone. Compared
to their performance when alone, when in the
presence of others, they tend to perform better on
simple or well-rehearsed tasks and worse on
complex or new ones.
2 Ambiguity effect The ambiguity effect was first described by Daniel
Ellsberg in 1961. It is a cognitive
bias where decision making is affected by a lack of
information, or "ambiguity".[1] The effect implies
that people tend to select options for which
the probability of a favorable outcome is known,
over an option for which the probability of a
favorable outcome is unknown. Missing
information makes the probability of the outcome
“unknown,” and people tend to avoid it.
3 Assembly bonus effect Assembly bonus effect is a term, first proposed in
1965, which means producing an outcome as
a group that is superior to the results that could
have been achieved by a simple aggregation or
accumulation of group members’ individual efforts.
It is explained as a gain in performance that is
caused by the way the members fit together to form
the work group.
4 Baader-Meinhof effect Originally, this concept was called frequency
illusion—a term coined by Stanford linguistics
professor Arnold Zwicky. In this illusion, a word, a
name, or other thing that has recently come to one's
attention suddenly seems to appear with improbable
frequency shortly afterwards. This illusion is
sometimes referred to as the Baader-Meinhof
phenomenon.
5 Barnum effect Barnum Effect, also called Forer Effect, is the
phenomenon that occurs when individuals believe
that personality descriptions apply specifically to
them (more so than to other people), despite the fact
that the description is actually filled with
information that applies to everyone. This effect
can provide a partial explanation for the widespread
acceptance of some paranormal beliefs and
practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, aura
reading, and some types of personality tests.
The term "Barnum effect" was coined in 1956 by
psychologist Paul Meehl in his essay Wanted – A
Good Cookbook.
6 Bezold effect The Bezold effect is an optical illusion, named after
a German professor of meteorology, Wilhelm von
Bezold (1837–1907), who discovered that a color
may appear different depending on its relation to
adjacent colors.
7 Birthday-number effect The birthday-number effect is the subconscious
tendency of people to prefer the numbers in the date
of their birthday over other numbers. First reported
in 1997 by Japanese psychologists Shinobu
Kitayama and Mayumi Karasawa, the birthday-
number effect has been replicated in various
countries. It holds across age and gender. The effect
is most prominent for numbers over 12.
8 Boomerang effect The Boomerang effect describes a social
psychology situation in which a person who is
presented with a persuasive message and then
adopts the opposite stance as a result.
9 Bouba/kiki effect
10 Bystander effect The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, is
a social psychological phenomenon in which
individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim
when other people are present.
11 Cinderella effect In evolutionary psychology, the Cinderella
effect is the phenomenon of higher incidence of
different forms of child-abuse and mistreatment
by stepparents than by biological parents.
12 Cocktail party effect The cocktail party effect is the phenomenon of the
brain's ability to focus one's auditory attention (an
effect of selective attention in the brain) on a
particular stimulus while filtering out a range of
other stimuli, as when a partygoer can focus on a
single conversation in a noisy room. Listeners have
the ability to both segregate different stimuli into
different streams, and subsequently decide which
streams are most pertinent to them.
13 Contrast effect The contrast effect is a magnification or
diminishment of perception as a result of previous
exposure to something of lesser or greater quality,
but of the same base characteristics. For example, a
car salesman shows you a very expensive car first
so that the one he showed you next (the one he
actually was trying to sell you) seemed inexpensive
compared to the first.
14 Coolidge effect The Coolidge effect can be attributed to an increase
in sexual responsiveness, and a decrease in
the refractory period.
15 Cross-race effect The cross-race effect (sometimes called cross-race
bias, other-race bias or own-race bias) is the
tendency to more easily recognize faces of
the race that one is most familiar with (which is
most often one's own race). In social psychology,
the cross-race effect is described as the "ingroup
advantage".
16 Dunning–Kruger effect It is a cognitive bias in which people of low ability
have illusory superiority and mistakenly assess
their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The
cognitive bias of illusory superiority comes from
the inability of low-ability people to recognize their
lack of ability; without the self-
awareness of metacognition, low-ability people
cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence
or incompetence.
17 Endowment effect In psychology and behavioral economics,
the endowment effect (also known as divestiture
aversion and related to the mere ownership
effect in social psychology) is the hypothesis that
people ascribe more value to things merely because
they own them.
18 False-consensus effect False-consensus effect or false-consensus bias is
an attributional type of cognitive bias whereby
people tend to overestimate the extent to which
their opinions, beliefs, preferences, values, and
habits are normal and typical of those of others (i.e.,
that others also think the same way that they do).
[1]
This cognitive bias tends to lead to
the perception of a consensus that does not exist, a
"false consensus".
19 False-uniqueness effect The false-uniqueness effect describes how people
tend to view their qualities, traits and personal
attributes as unique, when in reality they are not.
20 False-fame effect
21 Fan effect The fan effect is a psychological phenomenon
under the branch of cognitive psychology where
recognition times or error rate for a particular
concept increases as more information about the
concept is acquired.
22 Framing effect The framing effect is an example of cognitive bias,
in which people react to a particular choice in
different ways depending on how it is presented;
e.g. as a loss or as a gain. People tend to avoid risk
when a positive frame is presented but seek risks
when a negative frame is presented.
23 Florence Nightingale effect The Florence Nightingale effect is a trope where a
caregiver develops romantic feelings, sexual
feelings, or both for their patient, even if very little
communication or contact takes place outside of
basic care. Feelings may fade once the patient is no
longer in need of care.
24 Flynn effect The Flynn Effect is the tendency of IQ scores to
change over time, and specifically, the apparent
increase in intelligence in the general population
evidenced by a steady increase in IQ scores. It
was first noticed by James Flynn.
25 Focusing effect The focusing effect (or focusing illusion) is
a cognitive bias that occurs when people place too
much importance on one aspect of an event, causing
an error in accurately predicting the utility of a
future outcome.
26 Generation effect The generation effect is a phenomenon where
information is better remembered if it is generated
from one's own mind rather than simply read.
27 Google effect It is the tendency to forget information that can be
found readily online by using Internet search
engines such as Google.
28 Halo effect The halo effect is a type of immediate judgement
discrepancy, or cognitive bias, where a person
making an initial assessment of another person,
place, or thing will assume ambiguous information
based upon concrete information.
29 Hawthorne effect The Hawthorne effect (also referred to as
the observer effect is a type of reactivity in which
individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in
response to their awareness of being observed.
30 Hedonic treadmill The hedonic treadmill, also known as hedonic
adaptation, is the observed tendency of humans to
quickly return to a relatively stable level
of happiness despite major positive or negative
events or life changes.
31 Hostile media effect The hostile media effect/ hostile media
phenomenon and sometimes called hostile media
perception, is a perceptual theory of mass
communication that refers to the tendency for
individuals with a strong preexisting attitude on an
issue to perceive media coverage as biased against
their side and in favor of their antagonists' point of
view.
32 Hypersonic effect The hypersonic effect is a term coined to describe
a phenomenon reported in a controversial scientific
study by Tsutomu Oohashi et al., which claims that,
although humans cannot consciously
hear ultrasound (sounds at frequencies above
approximately 20 kHz), the presence or absence of
those frequencies has a measurable effect on their
physiological and psychological reactions.
33 Irrelevant speech effect The irrelevant speech effect refers to the
degradation of serial recall when speech sounds are
presented, even if the list items are presented
visually. The sounds need not be a language the
participant understands, nor even a real language;
human speech sounds are sufficient to produce this
effect.
34 Kappa effect The kappa effect or perceptual time dilation is
a temporal perceptual illusion that can arise when
observers judge the elapsed time between
sensory stimuli applied sequentially at different
locations. In perceiving a sequence of consecutive
stimuli, subjects tend to overestimate the elapsed
time between two successive stimuli when the
distance between the stimuli is sufficiently large,
and to underestimate the elapsed time when the
distance is sufficiently small.
35 Kinetic depth effect kinetic depth effect refers to the phenomenon
whereby the three-dimensional structural form of an
object can be perceived when the object is moving.
In the absence of other visual depth cues, this might
be the only perception mechanism available to infer
the object's shape. Being able to identify a structure
from a motion stimulus through the human visual
system was shown by Wallachand O'Connell in the
1950s through their experiments.
36 Kuleshov Effect The Kuleshov effect is a film editing (montage)
effect demonstrated by Soviet filmmaker Lev
Kuleshov in the 1910s and 1920s. It is a mental
phenomenon by which viewers derive more
meaning from the interaction of two sequential
shots than from a single shot in isolation.
37 Lady Macbeth effect Lady Macbeth effect or Macbeth effect is
a priming effect said to occur when response to
a cleaning cue is increased after having been
induced by a feeling of shame. The effect is
apparently localized enough that those who had
been asked to lie verbally preferred an oral cleaning
product and those asked to lie in writing preferred a
hand cleaning product over the other kind of
cleanser and other control items.
38 Lake Wobegon effect Illusory superiority is a condition of cognitive
bias whereby a person overestimates their own
qualities and abilities, in relation to the same
qualities and abilities of other persons.
39 Lawn dart effect Lawn dart effect occurs when fighter
aircraft pilots accelerate horizontally at more than
1 standard gravity. The effect occurs when such
extreme stimulation to the vestibular system leads
to the perception that the aircraft is climbing,
prompting the pilot to lower the aircraft's pitch
attitude, or drop the nose.
40 Levels-of-processing effect levels-of-processing effect, identified by Fergus I.
M. Craik and Robert S. Lockhart in 1972,
describes memory recall of stimuli as a function of
the depth of mental processing. Deeper levels of
analysis produce more elaborate, longer-lasting, and
stronger memory traces than shallow levels of
analysis.
41 Less-is-better effect The less-is-better effect is a type of preference
reversal that occurs when the lesser or smaller
alternative of a proposition is preferred when
evaluated separately, but not evaluated together.
The term was first proposed by Christopher Hsee.
42 Martha Mitchell effect Martha Mitchell effect is the process by which a
psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental
health clinician labels the patient's accurate
perception of real events
as delusionaland misdiagnoses accordingly.
43 Matthew effect (education) The Matthew Effect is social phenomenon often
linked to the idea that the rich get richer and the
poor get poorer. In essence, this refers to a common
concept that those who already have status are often
placed in situations where they gain more, and
those that do not have status typically struggle to
achieve more. This phrase has been attributed to
sociologist Robert K. Merton and based it off a
biblical verse in the Gospel of Matthew.
44 McCollough effect The McCollough effect is a phenomenon of
human visual perception in which
colorless gratings appear colored contingent on
the orientation of the gratings. It is an aftereffect
requiring a period of induction to produce it. For
example, if someone alternately looks at a red
horizontal grating and a green vertical grating for a
few minutes, a black-and-white horizontal grating
will then look greenish and a black-and-white
vertical grating will then look pinkish. The effect is
remarkable because, under certain circumstances, it
can last up to three months or more.
The effect was discovered by American
psychologist Celeste McCollough in 1965.
45 McGurk effect
McGurk effect is a cross-modal effect and illusion
that results from conflicting information coming
from different senses, namely sight and hearing.The
effect was discovered by Harry McGurk and John
MacDonald, and was published in Nature in 1976.
The illusion can be observed when one is asked to
watch a video of lip movements alongside listening
to sounds uttered, apparently by the same person
whose lip movements one is watching. If the lip
movements and the sounds do not match—for
example, if the lip movements indicate a “ba-ba”
sound, whereas the auditory information is that of
“ga-ga”—one typically experiences an illusory third
sound—for example “da-da”. McGurk and
MacDonald hypothesise that the effect is due to the
fact that the brain is trying to make a “best guess”,
given the information that is coming from different
senses is contradictory.