Parcticipants Guide Course 1
Parcticipants Guide Course 1
THIRD EDITION
PARTICIPANT GUIDE
COURSE ONE: AN INTRODUCTION TO IDSR ONLINE
TRAINING COURSES AND IDSR TECHNICAL GUIDELINES
3rd Edition
This booklet introduces all the eleven modules of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Training Course
INTEGRATED DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE
TRAINING COURSE
THIRD EDITION
P A R T I C IP A N T G U I D E
The modules comprising the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Training Course were prepared by the WHO Health
Emergencies (WHE) Programme with active participation and involvement of programmes dealing with disease surveillance
at the WHO Regional Office for Africa (AFRO), Brazzaville, Congo with technical reviews provided by the U.S Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). While the contents of this course
are in the public domain and may be used and reproduced without permission, please refer to the suggested citation: WHO-
AFRO & CDC (2019). Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response Training Course, Participant Guide: Introduction Module.
Brazzaville, Republic of Congo and Atlanta, USA.
iii
4.13 Practice exercise 1 .................................................................................................................... 29
5. NOTES TO PARTICIPANTS: MODULE 4: COMMUNITY-BASED SURVEILLANCE ....................................... 30
5.1 Definition of some key terminologies used in community-based surveillance (CBS) .................. 30
5.2 How to establish a community-based surveillance and response system ................................... 31
5.2.1 Criteria for CBS Focal person selection, their roles and responsibilities .................................... 31
5.2.2 IDSR community case definitions for use at the community level ............................................ 33
5.2.3 Explain how to report diseases, conditions and events from the community level .................. 33
5.3 Conducting an investigation, confirmation and response to a suspected case/public
health event at the community level ........................................................................................ 41
5.4 Providing feedback to the community following investigation and confirmation
of suspected cases of a public health event ............................................................................. 41
5.5 Monitoring, supervision and evaluation of CBS implementation ............................................. 42
5.6 Practice Exercises ...................................................................................................................... 42
5.5.1 Exercise 2.................................................................................................................................... 44
5.6.2 Exercise 3.................................................................................................................................... 44
5.6.3 Exercise 4 ................................................................................................................................... 47
6. SUMMARY OF COURSE 1........................................................................................................................ 50
7. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................... 50
iv
FOREWORD
In 1998, the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Africa (AFRO) together with
technical partners adopted a strategy for developing and implementing comprehensive public
health surveillance and response systems in African countries, initially called integrated disease
surveillance (IDS). However, to highlight the linkage between surveillance and response, the
strategy was later re-named integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR). The first edition
of the IDSR technical guidelines (2002) was widely adopted by Member States. Although progress
towards a coordinated, integrated surveillance system was variable, almost every country in the
region, invested human and material resources to strengthen capacities for public health
surveillance systems in order to prevent, timely detect, and respond appropriately to public
health threats.
The coming into force, in 2007, of the international health regulations (IHR 2005), the
emergence of new diseases, conditions and events and the formulation of strategies for
disaster risk management (DRM) resulted in the need to revise the first edition of the IDSR
guidelines. There was also a need to address the increasing burden of non-communicable
diseases. Further, there was a need to strengthen community-based surveillance for early
detection, rapid confirmation and response to public health threats. Moreover, alignment with
broader system strengthening objectives was required. Hence, in 2010, the second edition of
the IDSR guidelines was developed.
Despite the availability of the IDSR technical guidelines, the region continues to face challenges
in public health surveillance systems, with respect to the capacity to prevent, detect and respond
to public health threats. The unprecedented Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak of 2014 in West
Africa and other recent health emergencies has shown that the IHR (2005) have not been fully
implemented in many Member States. Consequently, addressing health emergencies remains a
major challenge, hence in 2019 the third edition of the IDSR technical guidelines was developed.
In order to effectively build the capacity of member countries in the use of the third edition IDSR
technical guidelines, the IDSR training modules have also been revised to the 3rd Edition IDSR
Training Modules (TMs).
Following my election, in January 2015, as Regional Director, after internal and external
consultations in May 2015, unveiled the transformation agenda of the WHO secretariat in the
African region, 2015-2020. One of the five interrelated and overlapping priorities in the
transformation agenda is improving health security.
I am glad to unveil the third edition of the IDSR training modules that has been prepared by the
WHO Health Emergency (WHE) programme in the WHO African region with active participation
and involvement of all clusters. In addition, there was active involvement of the WHO
Headquarters, the Inter Country Support teams, and the hubs, the WHO country offices, Member
states, as well as, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other relevant
stakeholders.
v
Many public health events (PHEs) and emergencies and their associated risk factors could be
prevented or their effects mitigated. However, the health systems in most countries remain
inadequate. To avert and mitigate the effects of future health security risks and emergencies, all
Member States should implement the 3rd edition IDSR technical guidelines by training all health
staff using these IDSR training course modules.
Therefore, I urge all Member States to fully implement this third edition of the IDSR training
modules everywhere in the WHO Africa region because they explicitly describe what needs to be
established at each level of the health system in order to detect, confirm, and respond to
diseases/health events that are responsible for all preventable illness, death and disability in local
communities.
The cost of good public health surveillance as a public health good is relatively very low compared
to many other strategies. I appeal to all Member States, national, regional and international
partners and funders that, we should begin the hard work now. Let us all embrace these IDSR
training modules to strengthen capacities for preparedness, alert and response for health
security in every place in the WHO African Region.
Finally, I appeal to you all to ensure that the third edition of the IDSR training modules are
implemented within a broader context of health system strengthening; better coordination
between human and animal health surveillance and other sectors involved in One Health
approach; improved use of laboratory network capacity in surveillance and response; and better
community engagement in public health interventions.
Dr Matshidiso Moeti
WHO Regional Director for Africa
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The third edition of the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Training Modules
was prepared by the WHO Health Emergencies (WHE) Programme with active participation and
involvement of programmes dealing with disease surveillance at the WHO Regional Office for
Africa (AFRO), Brazzaville, Congo with technical reviews provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
In planning to update these training modules, suggestions and advice for improving the
recommendations were sought and gratefully received from the IDSR development teams who
prepared the 1st and 2nd editions. This revision builds on the technical expertise from more than
100 surveillance and disease experts at WHO, CDC and Ministries of Health in African countries
who conceived and produced the 1st and 2nd Editions.
The revision process involved internal WHO consultation followed by a wider consultation that
involved a series of meetings with various partners and Member States. In addition, the IDSR task
force was constituted to help with the revision process. The final draft was peer reviewed during
in-country pilot IDSR trainings in five (5) countries namely; Ghana, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Uganda
and Zambia in October 2018.
The revision of the IDSR Training Modules was supported through a cooperation grant from
the United States Agency for International Development, Bureau for Africa (USAID/AFR),
Washington, D.C.
vii
WHO-AFRO is grateful to the following who contributed to the preparation of this revised
document by reviewing early drafts and providing constructive comments:
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
World Health Organization (WHO)
Prevention (CDC)
Dr Christopher S. Murrill Dr Andre Bita, FRH/IVD
Dr Olga Henao Dr Andrew Seidu Korkor, NTD/CDS
Dr Asumpta Muriithi, RWH/FRH
Dr Barry Ahmadou, DPC/WCO Guinea
Dr Charles Kuria Njuguna, IDSR/WCO Sierra Leone
United States Agency for Dr Frank Lule, HIV/AIDS/CDS/CDU
International Development (USAID) Mrs Kobie Aminata, HPD/AFRO
Ms. Andrea Long-Wagar Mr Koubemba Mona Harris, Data Manager/HSS
Mr Kubenga Steve Banza, Malaria/CDS/CDU
Ms Ishata Conteh, EMO/WHE
Ms Laetitia Galimbare, HTI/HSS
Dr Mary Stephen, IHR/CPI/WHE
Dr Monday Julius Rude, EPI/IDSR/WCO Liberia
Dr Nino Dal Dayanghirang, SDS/HSS
Mr Ocum Felix, Consultant IDSR/WCO Uganda
Dr Olufunmilayo Lesi, CDS/HTH
Mr Ouaya Bouesso Berence, Data Manager/HSS
Ms Precious Chisale Kalubula, NPO/WCO Zambia
Dr Vital Mondonge, NP, RSI & IDSR DRC
Technical Partners Member States/Ministry of Health (MoH)
Dr Lawson Ahadzie, Independent Dr Charles Keimbe, Sierra Leone
Public Health Dr Eldard Mabumba, Uganda
Consultant/Epidemiologist, Ghana Dr Franklin Asiedu-Bekoe, Ghana
Dr Micheal Adjabeng, Ghana
Dr Moussa Kone, Guinea
Mr Thomas Knue Nagbe, Liberia
viii
1. INTRODUCTION
In 1998, the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Africa (AFRO) together with
technical partners adopted the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy for
developing and implementing comprehensive public health surveillance and response systems in
African countries. In 2002, the first edition of the IDSR technical guidelines was widely adopted
by Member States. However, the coming into force, in 2007, of the International Health
Regulations (IHR 2005), the emergence of new diseases, conditions and events and the
formulation of strategies for Disaster Risk Management (DRM) resulted in the revision of the first
edition of the IDSR guidelines to the second edition of the IDSR guidelines in 2010.
Despite the availability of the IDSR technical guidelines, the region continues to face challenges
in public health surveillance systems, with respect to capacity to prevent, detect and respond to
public health threats. The unprecedented Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak of 2014 in West
Africa and other recent health emergencies has shown that the IHR (2005) have not been fully
implemented, in many Member States. Consequently, addressing health emergencies remains a
major challenge, hence in 2019 the third edition of the IDSR technical guidelines.
In order to effectively build the capacity of member countries in the use of the third edition IDSR
technical guidelines the IDSR training modules have also been revised to the 3rd Edition IDSR
Training Modules (TMs). The revised TMs consist of the Introduction modules and modules 1 to
10. We would present the introduction module in this booklet, and the other modules will be
presented in 10 other separate booklets.
To facilitate Participants’ learning, online Course 1 is divided into four modules namely:
1.1 Module 1: Introduction to IDSR Training Course
1.2 Module 2 and Module 3: Overview of IDSR Part 1 and Part 2
1.3 Module 4: Community-Based Surveillance
Module 1 introduces the 3rd Edition IDSR online training course for all levels of health service
delivery and also provides guidance on how to get maximum benefit from the IDSR training
course and gives highlights of all the modules.
Module 2 and Module 3 introduce the concepts of the 3rd Edition of the IDSR technical
guidelines, which incorporates indicator-based and event-based surveillance. It also provides
guidance on the objectives of IDSR, how IDSR works, the core surveillance functions and how
1
IDSR can help to build and sustain the International Health Regulation (IHR) implementation.
Furthermore, this sub-module emphasizes on concepts such as: the “One Health Approach”;
introduces the linkage between Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and IDSR.
The African Region has had to deal with outbreaks of cholera, meningitis and influenza among
other diseases in the last decade, and lately the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). It is known that
countries with weak surveillance systems or without CBS systems are not able to promptly
detect and respond timely to public health threats or events. There is therefore the need to
strengthen public health surveillance at all levels and especially at the community level. This sub-
module introduces key steps of conducting public health surveillance and response at the
community level. It also gives guidance in implementing an effective CBS system for
preparedness and response to public health emergencies and events including disease
outbreaks occurring at the community level.
The purpose of Course 1 is to introduce the participants to the general objectives, structure and
content of the IDSR training course and how they should participate in the course. It further
introduces participants to the general concepts of IDSR strategy implementation in their
respective areas of work and also equip participants with knowledge and skills in establishing and
implementing CBS system.
2
2. GENERAL NOTES TO PARTICIPANTS (for direct training only)
The purpose of this training course is to improve the skills and knowledge of health staff to carry
out activities that contribute to the national disease surveillance, laboratory and response
system. These are skills which should result in more timely detection and response to epidemic
prone disease outbreaks and other public health events subsequently reducing morbidity,
mortality and disability in communities.
3
Previous IDSR and IHR (2005) assessments of national surveillance and response systems have
shown that:
(a) Written standard case definitions for national priority diseases are not always readily
available especially at the health facility or at district level. Health care workers’ level of
knowledge on standard case definition is sub-optimal.
(b) Health workers were expected to complete multiple reporting forms from different health
programmes and then forward them to the central level. There was little or no analysis at
the lower level.
(c) The quality of IDSR data in various levels is seldom monitored.
(d) No standard disease outbreak investigation forms and suspected outbreak/rumours logbook
were used.
(e) In many cases, the local public health laboratories were not used effectively during the
investigations.
(f) The District public health management committees or inter-sectoral emergency committees
did not exist in many countries.
(g) Supervisory visits were not always carried out regularly or consistently. Feedback to the
lower levels was scarce, and, where feedback occurred, it was mainly verbal.
Disease surveillance and response systems in many countries face serious challenges in achieving
reliable surveillance and response outcomes. Most countries do not have the minimum IHR core
capacities requirements for surveillance, reporting, notification, verification, and response in
place including appropriate activities at the ports of entry. In order to address these
shortcomings, the IDSR TGs and this set of training modules on IDSR have been developed for
use by health workers to enhance the implementation of IDSR skills and activities.
4
The specific objectives
5
3.4 PURPOSE FOR REVISING 2ND EDITION IDSR TECHNICAL GUIDELINES TO 3RD EDITION
The purpose for revising these IDSR technical guidelines was to:
(a) Align with the current situation and needs of the Member States.
(b) Align with the objectives, targets and elements of the WHO Africa region’s strategy for
health security and emergencies 2016–2020.
(c) Update the guidelines with contemporary information, taking into consideration new
developments such as: emerging and re-emerging priority diseases, conditions and events.
(d) Incorporate recent recommendations from expert panels on strengthening the IHR, 2005
that are underpinned on the “One Health Approach”.
(e) Holistically address DRM strategies.
(f) Take into account lessons learnt from the unprecedented EVD outbreak in West Africa,
polio eradication and other humanitarian crises.
(g) Take advantage of technology advancement and utilize the opportunities offered by the
internet and mobile phones to scale up the implementation of real time community-based
surveillance with robust Geographical Information System (GIS) platforms.
(h) Scale up other electronic surveillance systems and incorporate new ways for capacity
building using the IDSR eLearning tools.
3.5 LAYOUT OF THE IDSR TRAINING COURSE (for direct training only)
This course is designed to take participants through the 3rd edition IDSR TGs chapter by chapter
to ensure that they have a good understanding of the content and the application of the material.
6
3.5.1 Organization of the Online IDSR training course:
(a) It is organized into 5 courses and each course is divided into modules as described below.
(b) Each module corresponds to a section in the 3rd Edition IDSR TGs and you will be guiding
them through each module in chronological order.
(c) The modules contain all of the information that participants will need to complete the
exercises.
(d) They will keep these modules and completed exercises as future reference guides.
(e) Examples of completed forms and appropriate responses to situations will be provided.
(f) The modules conclude with blank or partially completed forms providing practice for the
participants.
(g) Your facilitator will review all the answers after completing a module to be sure that
everyone has the correct answers and encourage questions for clarification.
1. Course 1: An introduction to the IDSR online training courses and IDSR Technical Guidelines
3rd Edition
(a) Introduces the IDSR course structure and gives an overview of the IDSR strategy and its
linkages with IHR, DRM, Cross-Border Surveillance etc.
(b) This course also provides guidance for establishing CBS to increase the sensitivity of
surveillance system therefore enhancing early detection and response.
(c) The module further emphasizes on the integration of EBS into CBS which contributes to
early warning and alert.
(d) It also introduces all the modules.
(Source: Introduction Section of the 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
2. Course 2: Identifying, recording, reporting and analysing priority diseases, conditions and
events
Module 1: Identify and record cases of priority diseases, conditions or events
(a) This module describes how to identify priority diseases, conditions and events using
standard case definitions.
(b) It also gives a description of procedures for planning surveillance and response activities
in your catchment area.
(c) It further emphasizes the role of laboratory in surveillance and response.
(Source: Section 1 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
7
Module 2: Report priority diseases, conditions and events
This module describes how to report priority diseases, conditions and events within the
required timelines.
(Source: Section 2 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
Module 3: Analyse and interpret data
This module describes how to receive surveillance data and analyse it by time, place and
person. It also provides guidance on how to interpret the analysed data.
(Source: Section 3 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
3. Course 3: Investigating, preparing and responding to outbreaks and other public health
events
Module 1: Investigate and confirm suspected outbreaks and other public health events
(a) This module describes the steps in outbreak investigation.
(b) It enables participants to gain knowledge and skills in early outbreak detection and
response.
(Source: Section 4 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
Module 2: Prepare to respond to outbreaks and other public health events
(a) This module provides guidance in establishing public health emergency response
structures such as Public Health Emergency Operation Centre (PHEOC), Public Health
Emergency Management Committees (PHEMC), and Public Health Emergency Rapid
Response Teams (PHERRT).
(b) It also guides on how to prepare and activate an effective EPR plans.
(Source: Section 5 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
Module 3: Respond to outbreaks and other public health events
(a) This module provides guidance on how to respond to public health emergencies using
the response structures.
(b) It also gives specific response to selected common epidemic prone diseases in the
African Region.
(Source: Section 6 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
Module 4 : Risk Communication
This module describes how to conduct risk communication before, during and after the
outbreak.
(Source: Section 7 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
8
4. Course 4: Monitoring, supervising and evaluating the implementation of the IDSR Strategy
Module 1: Monitor, supervise, evaluate and provide feedback to improve surveillance and
response
(a) This module describes how to routinely monitor, supervise and evaluate the
performance of the surveillance system and specific disease or public health events
control and prevention programs.
(b) It also explains how to develop and disseminate information products such as weekly
and monthly epidemiological bulletins.
(Source: Section 8 of 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
Reading: Participants will read sections of the 3rd Edition IDSR TGs and also be given take home
reading assignments. During lectures, participants will be asked to read selected sections of the
training slides.
Presentation/facilitation with training slides: Presentations will be delivered using power point
training slides with demonstrations per module. The content of the training slides are summaries
from the 3rd Edition IDSR TGs.
Individual work: Participants will be given exercises to solve individually during lessons and also
as take home assignments
Small group work: Participants will be put into small groups of 5-10 to solve exercises/case
studies and this will be followed by plenary discussions led by the facilitator.
9
Plenary discussions: Exercises/case studies will be discussed with entire group by the facilitator.
Pre and Post-test: A set of 20 short questions covering the IDSR TGs will be administered to
participants prior to the start of the course and upon its conclusion (for direct training only)
Daily short quizzes (non-written): Five (5) short questions on the previous lessons taught will
be administered every morning to the participants before the start of the day’s lesson. The daily
quizzes will be used as a recap and delivered in a game-like manner followed by rewards for the
best performing participants. The participants answer the quizzes verbally and the facilitator
leads the discussions to provide the correct answers. (for direct training only)
End of IDSR training course evaluation: At the end of each module, participants will be made to
complete respective questions for that module in the evaluation tool to reduce recall bias
Post IDSR training monitoring and supervision: The participants will be followed up to their
respective work sites to assess their knowledge and performance in IDSR activities. This should
be done on the third and sixth month after the IDSR training course. A Post IDSR training
monitoring and supervisory checklist will be administered to the trainee by the supervisor.
This updated version of the IDSR training modules emphasized on concepts such as:
(a) Event based surveillance
(b) Community-based surveillance
(c) IDSR in One health concept; and has seen the introduction of new concepts as follows:
(i) IDSR in DRM
(ii) The eIDSR concept
(iii) Tailoring IDSR to Emergency or Fragile Health System Contexts
(iv) Cross-border surveillance and IDSR
(v) Risk Communication
(a) WHO-AFRO Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in the
African Region, 3rd Edition 2019: Booklets One, Two, Three, Four, Five and Six.
(b) International Health Regulations (2005), third edition, WHO 2016.
(c) Training modules for integrated disease surveillance and response, 3rd Edition.
10
(a) The various modules of the 3rd Edition IDSR Training Course have been put into six (6)
separate booklets in the following order:
• Booklet one: Course 1
• Booklet two: Course 2
• Booklet three: Course 3
• Booklet four: Course 4
• Booklet five: Course 5
• Course Facilitator’s Instructions Booklet
11
(d) Each module has:
(i) A Facilitator’s guide
(ii) A Participant’s guide
(iii) Training slides
• The Facilitator’s Guide is outlined as following;
▪ Introduction (Description of the module)
▪ Purpose of the module
▪ Learning objectives
▪ Teaching guide (Modality of teaching)
▪ Suggested time to complete module
▪ Preparatory materials/logistics/Equipment needed to teach the module
▪ Facilitator’s Instructions
▪ Exercises and proposed answers
▪ Summary
▪ References
• The Participant’s Guide is outlined as following;
▪ Introduction (Description of the module)
▪ Purpose of module
▪ Learning Objectives
▪ Participant’s notes
▪ Exercises
▪ Summary
▪ References
• The Training Slides are outlined as following;
▪ The purpose of the module
▪ Learning Objectives
▪ Sub-topics as per the 3rd Edition IDSR TGs
▪ Instructions to exercises
▪ Summary
12
4. NOTES TO PARTICIPANTS: MODULES 2 and 3: OVERVIEW OF IDSR
NB: The overview of IDSR online training session has been subdivided into Modules 2 and 3
You can find details of all this information in the Introduction Section of the 3rd Edition IDSR
Technical Guidelines Booklet One:
Public Health Surveillance is the ongoing systematic identification, collection, collation, analysis,
and interpretation of disease occurrence and public health event data to take timely and robust
action. It includes the timely dissemination of the resulting information to those who need to
know for effective and appropriate action. Surveillance is also essential for planning,
implementation, and evaluation of public health practice.
The approaches to public health surveillance used in disease control programs include:
(a) Passive surveillance: a system by which, a health institution receives routine reports
submitted from health facilities (hospitals, clinics, public health units, or community or
other sources. There is no active search for cases. This is the most common, and it includes
the surveillance of diseases using routine indicator based surveillance; routine health
management and information system (HMIS).
(b) Active surveillance: It involves an ongoing search for cases in the community or the health
facilities. This may involve regular contacts with key reporting sources, such as telephone
calls to health care workers at a facility or laboratory or physically moving to the source.
Examples include active search of cases of measles and polio, as well as during outbreaks
where one must institute mechanisms for active finding of additional cases.
(c) Integrated Disease Surveillance: It is an approach that aims at collecting health data for
multiple diseases using standardized tools.
To ensure robust early warning and prompt response, the IDSR data collection and analysis
system relies on two main channels of information or signal generation, namely: (1) Indicator-
Based Surveillance (IBS) and (2) Event-Based Surveillance (EBS).
13
The common types of indicator-based surveillance are:
(a) Facility-based surveillance: All reporting units (e.g., health facilities) are required to report
on a weekly, monthly, quarterly or annual basis to the next level based on the categories
of the diseases, conditions and events. Additionally, they are also required to report
immediately, any epidemic prone disease to the next level.
(b) Sentinel surveillance: A given number of health facilities or reporting sites designated as
sentinel sites for early warning and reporting of priority events such as pandemic or
epidemic events and other events of public health importance. Sentinel sites are usually
designated because they are representative of an area or are in an area of likely risk for a
disease or condition of concern.
(c) Disease-specific (vertical) surveillance: surveillance that involves activities aimed at
targeted health data for a specific disease for vertical surveillance. Examples include
Tuberculosis, and HIV surveillance systems.
(d) Case-based surveillance: For diseases that are targeted for elimination or eradication or
during confirmed outbreaks, every individual case identified is reported immediately, using
a case-based form to the next level.
(e) Syndromic surveillance: an active or passive system that uses Standard Case Definitions
based entirely on clinical features without any laboratory diagnosis.
(f) Community-Based Surveillance (CBS): is defined as the surveillance system that collects
community-based health information; and the entire community population is under
surveillance, and not simply a segment of the community. CBS incorporates both Indicator-
based and Event-based surveillance methods. In CBS, there are identified focal person(s)
who report cases or events to the designated focal point at the nearby local health facilities.
Community-based surveillance strategies focus on one or more specific disease (s) or
patterns of illness of interest in a given community. For example, trusted community
members are trained to identify diseases such as measles, cholera, polio and Guinea worm,
using community (lay) case definition and use standardized reporting to the next level.
Often CBS focal points transport the patient and can help identify contacts.
14
(i) Events related to the occurrence of disease in humans, such as clustered cases of a
disease or syndromes, unusual disease patterns or unexpected deaths as recognized
by health workers and other key informants in the country; and
(ii) Events related to potential exposure for humans, such as events related to diseases
and deaths in animals, contaminated food products or water, and environmental
hazards including chemical and radio-nuclear events.
(iii) Event based surveillance also involve media monitoring to look for events of public
health concern and this involve the regular scanning of- newspapers, internet sites
and media alert systems e.g. Promed, blogs, social media, radios, and television
(iv) A key feature of EBS is an emphasis on immediate detection and rapid reporting of
alerts.
Unlike indicator-based surveillance, event-based surveillance is not based on the routine monitoring
of indicators and automated thresholds for action but rather on the screening of all available
information to detect any event happening in the community (unusual disease or deaths in humans
or animals, unusual or clustering of cases, events/conditions in the community.
Note that; Regardless of the type of surveillance, remember that surveillance is data that is used for
action!
The Event-based Surveillance (EBS) and Indicator-Based Surveillance (IBS) are components of
Early Warning and Response (EWAR) and epidemic intelligence incorporated in the IDSR strategy.
Both EBS and IBS are complimentary with each having a different role to play and purpose. EBS
is most likely to pick up alerts to detect small outbreaks early, while IBS is better in monitoring
disease trends overtime and useful for signalling the start of regular seasonal outbreaks of
endemic diseases using alert and epidemic thresholds. IBS may not be useful for smaller events
because alerts are either averaged out in large data sets, or lost in smaller data sets. EBS is also
better at picking up alerts indicating outbreaks in areas where access to healthcare is limited. In
the context of IDSR strategy, the flow of EBS information follows the same reporting lines as IBS
i.e. from community to sub-district/district to region/province and to national level. EBS and IBS
are applied at all levels of the health system namely community, health facility, district,
regional/provincial and national levels (demonstrated in figure 1).
15
Figure 1: Levels of Applications and Reporting of EBS and IBS in the context of IDSR
At National level:
• EBS implementation using hotlines and media scanning at PHEOC
• Oversees implementation of EBS and IBS at all levels
Regional/Provincial level:
• EBS implementation using hotlines and media scanning
• Supervises implementation of EBS and IBS at district level
District level:
• DHMT ensures EBS implementation using hotlines and media scanning
• Supervises implementation of EBS and IBS at health facility and community levels
Community level:
• CBS Focal persons implement EBS and IBS at community level
• Detects and notify alerts to nearest health facilities
Your Facilitator will use the diagram below to explain the algorithm of the Indicator-based
and event-based surveillance as incorporated in IDSR strategy
16
Figure 2: Indicator-based and event-based surveillance for Early Warning
Alert and Response for IDSR Strategy
INTEGRATED DISEASE
SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE (IDSR)
IBS EBS
NB: Intersection of IBS and EBS: All events detected in the EBS system that are investigated and meet the standard case
definition should be captured in the IBS system and reported to the next level of health care system.
17
4.3 WHAT IS THE INTEGRATED DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE (IDSR) STRATEGY?
(a) Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy was adopted by WHO AFRO
member states in September 1998 as the approach for improving public health surveillance
and response for priority diseases, conditions and events at community, health facility,
district and national level.
(b) IDSR is a strategy for coordinating and integrating surveillance activities by focusing on
preparedness and response functions of the disease surveillance system at all levels.
(c) Scarce resources are combined to collect information from a single focal point at each level.
(d) IDSR promotes rational and efficient use of resources by integrating and streamlining
common surveillance activities and functions.
(e) The IDSR strategy makes surveillance and laboratory data more usable, help public health
managers and decision-makers improve detection and response to the leading causes of
illness, death and disability in African countries.
(f) Surveillance activities for different diseases involve similar functions (detection, sample
collection, reporting, analysis and interpretation, feedback, action) and often use the same
structures, processes and personnel. As such, the principles of surveillance are the same
whether applied to a single or multiple disease, condition or event. What may differ is
whether the target is elimination or eradication, which may require time-limited intensive
efforts aimed at proving the absence of disease.
Integration refers to harmonizing different methods, software, data collection forms, standards
and case definitions in order to prevent inconsistent information and maximize efforts among all
disease prevention and control programmes and stakeholders:
(a) Where possible, countries use a common reporting form, a single data entry system for
multiple diseases, and common communication channels.
(b) Training and supervision are integrated.
(c) A common feedback bulletin is used, and other resources such as computers and vehicles
are shared.
(d) IDSR involves full time coordination of surveillance activities and joint action (planning,
implementation, monitoring, evaluation) whenever it is possible and useful.
Coordination refers to working or acting together effectively for the rational and efficient use of
available but limited resources such as the Health Management Information System (HMIS) and
various disease programs:
18
(a) Coordination involves information sharing, joint planning, monitoring and evaluation in
order to provide accurate, consistent and relevant data and information to policy-makers
and stakeholders at regional, inter-country and national levels.
The 3rd Edition IDSR Technical Guidelines presents a comprehensive vision of a disease
surveillance and response system. In IDSR, all levels of the health system (community, health
facility, district, region or province and national levels including international level- WHO country
Offices and Regional Office)) are involved in surveillance activities for responding to priority
diseases, conditions and events. These activities include the following core functions:
(a) Identify and record cases, conditions and events.
(b) Report suspected cases, conditions or events to the next level for action.
(c) Analyse and interpret findings.
19
(d) Investigate and confirm suspected cases, outbreaks or events.
(e) Prepare to respond to public health events.
(f) Respond to public health events.
(g) Communicate risk and provide feedback to health workers and the community.
(h) Monitor, Supervise, Evaluate and improve the system.
(a) The matrix describes the roles and responsibilities of those involved in IDSR implementation.
(b) Practical uses of the surveillance matrix include:
(i) Ensuring that all necessary functions and capacities have been identified
(ii) Establishing accountability to provide a basis for assigning functions to appropriate
levels and determining what capacities should be present
(iii) Organizing activities and training for human resource development
(iv) Managing and monitoring programs
(v) Strengthening district laboratory capacity, including laboratory information system
(vi) Planning for resources (human, material/supplies and financial).
(c) The IDSR matrix in the Introduction Section, Annex 1 A, pages XX to XX of the 3rd Edition
IDSR Technical Guidelines Booklet One defines the surveillance functions and how they are
20
achieved at each level of the health system including the role of WHO in relation to IDSR
core functions
Refer to Annex G of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical Guidelines Booklet One for description of the
specific roles and responsibilities of all the different actors in IDSR. Your facilitator will ask you to
read this section and explain the role of each health worker:
21
The following chart demonstrates the overlap of IDSR and IHR (2005)
Monitoring and evaluation of the functional core capacity for implementation of IHR 2005
This is demonstrated in the diagram on the next page. Your Facilitator will explain the
diagram to you.
22
Principles of a new IHR Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (IHR MEF)
23
4.7 IDSR AND DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT (DRM)
What is DRM?
Disaster risk management (DRM) is defined as the systematic process of using administrative and
organizational directives, operational skills and capacities to implement strategies, policies and
improved coping capacities in order to lessen the adverse impact of hazards and the possibility
of disaster.
Points to note:
(a) Disaster risk management is driven by understanding the major hazards (Hazard Analysis);
followed by the assessment on the level of vulnerability and available coping capacity;
(b) The ultimate objective of disaster risk management is reducing risk by reducing
vulnerability or improving the capacity to mitigate impact of a hazard;
(c) IDSR is an important tool in the DRM, as it provides early warning information, which is
crucial for risk assessment and ultimately, risk reduction;
(d) IDSR assists in identification of hazards, assessment and monitoring of disaster risks, and
hence enhance early warning component.
24
4.9 THE RELATION BETWEEN POINTS OF ENTRY AND IDSR
25
(l) Reduced system costs and easily generated automated alerts
This Information on e-IDSR can be obtained from Section 9 of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical
Guidelines Booklet Four
Action to take during Humanitarian Emergencies is to Enhance IDSR to improve early warning and
response
Details of this information can be obtained from Section 10 of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical
Guidelines Booklet Five
4.12 WHAT ARE THE PRIORITY DISEASES, CONDITIONS AND EVENTS FOR IDSR
26
(ii) Diseases with highly epidemic potential to cause serious public health impact due to
their ability to spread rapidly internationally (for example, cholera, plague, yellow
fever, viral haemorrhagic fever);
(iii) Principal causes of morbidity and mortality due to communicable diseases and
conditions in the African Region (for example, malaria, pneumonia, diarrhoeal
diseases, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, maternal deaths and injuries);
(iv) Priority Non-communicable diseases or conditions in the region (high blood pressure,
diabetes mellitus, mental health and malnutrition);
(v) Effective control and prevention interventions are available for addressing the public
health problems they pose (for example onchocerciasis, trypanosomiasis);
(vi) Intervention programs supported by WHO for prevention and control, eradication or
elimination of the diseases exists. For example, the Expanded Program on
Immunizations (EPI), the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness
(IMNCI).
27
Table 2: Priority diseases, conditions and events for Integrated Disease Surveillance
and Response – 20181
Epidemic prone diseases,
Diseases targeted for eradication Other major diseases, events or conditions
conditions or events which
or elimination of public health importance
require immediate reporting
1. Acute haemorrhagic fever 1. Buruli ulcer 1.
Acute and Chronic viral hepatitis
syndrome* 2. Bacterial Meningitis 2.
Adverse events following immunization
2. Anthrax 3. Dracunculiasis (Guinea Worm (AEFI)
3. Bacterial Meningitis Disease) 3. Diabetes mellitus (new cases)
4. Chikungunya 4. Leprosy 4. Diarrhoea with dehydration less than 5
5. Cholera 5. Lymphatic filariasis years of age
6. Dengue 6. Malaria 5. Epilepsy
7. Diarrhoea with blood 7. Measles 6. Human Rabies
(Shigella) 8. Neonatal tetanus 7. HIV/AIDS (new cases)
8. Listeriosis 9. Noma 8. Hypertension (new cases)
9. Malaria 10. Poliomyelitis*** 9. Injuries (Road traffic Accidents)
10. Middle East respiratory 11. Onchocerciasis 10. Malaria
syndrome (MERS) 12. Rabies (Human) 11. Malnutrition in children under 5 years of
11. Monkey pox 13. Trachoma age
12. Plague 14. Yaws and endemic syphilis or 12. Maternal deaths
13. SARIs** bejel 13. Non-neonatal tetanus
14. Typhoid fever 14. Perinatal deaths
15. Yellow fever *** Disease specified by IHR (2005) for 15. Severe pneumonia less than 5 years of
immediate notification age
16. Zika virus disease
16. STIs
Also: 17. Schistosomiasis
A cluster of deaths in the 18. Soil transmitted helminths
community (animal or human 19. Trachoma
deaths) 20. Trypanosomiasis
21. Tuberculosis (new cases)
A cluster of unwell people or 22. MDR/XDR Tuberculosis
Diseases or events of international concern
animals with similar symptoms
Human influenza due to a new subtype***
* Ebola, Marburg, Rift Valley, Lassa, SARS***
Crimean Congo, West Nile Fever, Smallpox***
Dengue
Zika virus disease
** National programmes may wish to Yellow fever
add Influenza-like illnesses to their Any public health event of international or national concern (infectious, zoonotic,
priority disease list
food borne, chemical, radio nuclear, or due to unknown condition.
Note: It is important to remember that countries may select from this list according to national priorities and the epidemiologic situation.
Disease-specific summary pages are available in Section 11 of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical Guidelines Booklet Six.
1 Some diseases appear more than once in the table e.g. malaria, trachoma, bacterial meningitis Countries should retain
the disease in the most appropriate column according to their epidemiological context.
28
4.13 PRACTICE EXERCISE 1
* * * *
Instructions: Use information in the Introduction Section of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical
Guidelines Booklet One to fill in the blank boxes with appropriate terms from the following list:
(a) Prepare
(b) Respond
(c) Report
(d) Investigate and Confirm
(e) Communicate risk and provide feedback
Figure 2
Epidemic
Epidemic
Management Cycle
Evaluate
29
5. NOTES TO PARTICIPANTS: MODULE 4: COMMUNITY-BASED
SURVEILLANCE
Define Community
A community is in the context of disease surveillance can be defined as a place, or small
geographical area, where a group of people live and share common interests and have a social
network of relationships at a local level.
Define an Event
An event as define by International Health Regulations (IHR) is “a manifestation of disease or an
occurrence that creates a potential for disease”. It can include events that are infectious,
zoonotic, food safety, chemical, radiological or nuclear in origin and whether transmitted by
persons, vectors, animals, goods/food, or through the environment
Define Alert
(a) An indirect early warning signs of a potential public health event occurring in a community
under surveillance.
(b) Alerts are patterns of disease or other information representing potential acute risk to
human health, such as an outbreak.
(c) All alerts may not become events and as such needs to be triaged and verified before
response is initiated.
(d) Alerts may consist of reports of cases or deaths (individual or aggregated), potential
exposure of human beings to biological, chemical or radiological and nuclear hazards, or
occurrence of natural or man-made disasters.
30
5.2 HOW TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY-BASED SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE SYSTEM
Your Facilitator will explain the details of how to establish a community-based surveillance and
response system.
You can also read this information in the Introduction Section, Annex D of the 3rd Edition IDSR
Technical Guidelines Booklet One
5.2.1 Criteria for CBS Focal person selection, their roles and responsibilities
(a) District and sub-district should work with community leaders to identify members of the
community to receive relevant training as CBS Focal persons.
(b) Any community member acceptable by the community can be a CBS focal point.
(c) Representation could be from basic community-level services such as:
(i) Trained birth attendants
(ii) Community health agents, or similar care providers
(iii) Community health workers or volunteers
(iv) Community leaders (religious, traditional or political)
(v) School teachers
(vi) Veterinarians/veterinary technicians
(vii) Health extension workers
(viii) Pharmacists/medicine sellers
(ix) Traditional healers
(d) Selection criteria
(i) Hard working and committed to reporting
(ii) Resident in the community
(iii) Well known, trusted and respected member of the community
31
(iv) Have the community’s welfare at heart and willing to be a champion of their
community
(v) Accepted by the community so as to be able to communicate with inhabitants.
(vi) Be literate enough to record events/data on the register provided
(vii) Selected irrespective of Gender
(viii) Be recognized by all identified groups where ethnic and religious differences exist
(ix) Able to communicate in local language(s)
(e) Once selected, the CBS focal person should receive training and carry out supportive
supervision of how to recognize certain diseases or health conditions for the purpose of
reporting suspect cases.
(a) Using community case definitions and pre-determine events/alerts to identify priority
diseases, events, conditions or other hazards in the community.
(b) Record priority diseases, conditions, or unusual health events/alerts in the reporting forms
and tools (tally sheets) and report to nearest health facility/sub-district immediately within
24 hours.
(c) Conduct household visits on a regular basis.
(d) Meet with key informants on a regular basis.
(e) Attend local ceremonies and events and follow up on anything unusual e.g. someone you
were expecting to be there doesn’t show up.
(f) Participating in verbal autopsies by administering interview questions prepared by the
supervisor at the health facility.
(g) Involving local leaders in describing diseases, events and trends in the community.
(h) Sensitization of the community to report and seek care for priority diseases, conditions, and
unusual events.
(i) Supporting health workers during case or outbreak investigation and contact tracing.
(j) Mobilize local authorities and community members to support response activities.
(k) Participating in risk mapping of potential hazards and in training including simulation
exercises.
(l) Participating in containment and response activities in collaboration with the different levels
of the health system:
(i) Participation in response activities could include, home-based care, social or behaviour
change of traditional practices, logistics for distribution of medicines, vaccines or other
supplies.
(ii) Providing trusted health education in a crisis is a useful contribution.
32
(m) Give feedback to community members about reported cases, events/alerts and prevention
activities.
(n) Verifying if public health interventions took place as planned with the involvement of the
community.
(o) Participate in meetings organized by sub-district, district, and higher-level authorities.
Example
CBS focal person hears of several cases of acute watery diarrhoea with vomiting in the community. The
CBS focal person suspects cholera and reports the rumour to the local health facility and to the district
level heath officer by text messaging. Members of the rapid response team (RRT) travelled to the
community to verify and investigate the possible outbreak, and, based on the investigation results,
implemented control and prevention measures. The outbreak is quickly contained thanks to the early
warning from the community-based surveillance focal person.
5.2.2 IDSR community case definitions for use at the community level
Your Facilitator will explain the community case definitions and the signal detection
You can read this information in Section 1, Annex 1B of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical Guidelines
Booklet Two
5.2.3 Explain how to report diseases, conditions and events from the community level
33
• In some African countries, a large number of the population depends on
traditional medicine for primary health care
• Traditional medicine has been used for thousands of years, and these practitioners
may constitute a valuable information
• Families with sick members often seek spiritual guidance at shrines known for
healing
What to Report (This should be captured in a pictorial form in the CBS register)
(a) A suspected case or public health event/alert that should be reported immediately
(within 24 hours) are:
(i) Anyone with onset of an illness meeting any of the IDSR community case definitions
in the catchment area, OR
(ii) Any sudden death if the catchment area is undergoing a known public health event
of the IDSR priority conditions, OR
(iii) Any unusual public health event/alert
• Examples:
▪ Unexplained cluster of similar severe illnesses within one week.
▪ High absenteeism at school.
▪ Two or more cases of people presenting with similar severe signs/symptoms
from the same community, school, or workplace within one week (NB:
severe can be elaborated at the community level as needing to seek medical
care).
▪ A cluster of unexplained animal deaths within one week.
▪ An illness with novel or rare symptoms (NB: Novel or rare can be explained
as signs/symptoms that the community has not seen before).
Whom to Report
If a suspected case (living or dead) or public health event/alert is identified: Report it to the
community-based surveillance supervisor or surveillance officer or health facility manager in the
catchment area within 24 hours.
34
Methods and Timelines for reporting a suspected diseases/conditions/public health event
(a) If a disease, condition or public health event that requires to be reported immediately
(within 24 hours) is suspected:
(i) It should be reported by the fastest means possible such as calls by telephone (mobile
phones), text messages or hand delivery in person.
(ii) Initial information on the suspected disease/condition/public health event/alert
should be gathered using the community alert forms.
Your Facilitator will explain the reporting structure for community alert and verification shown
in the diagram below:
35
Verification and Investigation of CBS Events
WHO
TAKE ACTION
REASSURANCE to CBS
Health Facility/Subdistrict Team verifies
and maintain
the alert in the community
SURVEILLANCE
Your Facilitator will demonstrate how to complete the CBS reporting forms A and B, after which
you practice how to complete the forms in exercise 2
36
A: COMMUNITY ALERT REPORTING FORM [SEND THIS FORM IMMEDIATELY TO YOUR
SUPERVISOR OR NEARBY HEALTH FACILITY]
Instructions: This form is completed by the CBS focal person and submitted immediately to nearest health
facility/sub-district surveillance focal person when he or she identifies disease (s) or public health event
as per the community case definition. It is also completed for unusual health events/alerts that is not
captured by the given case definition.
2. Telephone number:_____________________Community___________________District_________________
NB: Countries should adopt this form such that it is used to capture and notify/report the country’s priority diseases (Indicator-
based surveillance) and events/alerts (event-based surveillance) occurring at the community level. This can be carbonated in
the form of a CBS Register or note book with a copy sent to the nearest health facility and copy kept at community with the
CBS focal person. Sections of the register should include pictures or images of the community case definitions and the
predetermined events/alerts to assist in detection at the community level.
37
B: COMMUNITY-BASED SURVEILLANCE (CBS) SUSPECTED DISEASES AND PUBLIC HEALTH
EVENTS MONTHLY LOG SHEET
Instructions: This form is a line listing of all the diseases/events/alerts identified during the
month. It is completed by the CBS focal person and submitted monthly to nearest health
facility/sub-district surveillance focal person every month.
Community-Based Surveillance Suspected Diseases and Public Health Events Monthly Log Sheet
District______________________________________Ward/Subdistrict_______________________________
Community:_________________________________________Month__________________ Year__________
Serial Type of illness/ When did this Where did this How many How what action
Number Condition/Event/Signal happen happen have been many died was taken
affected
(DD/MM/YYY) (Community, District)
NB: Countries should adopt this form such that it is used to capture and notify/report the country’s priority diseases (Indicator-based surveillance)
and events/alerts (event-based surveillance) occurring at the community level. This can be carbonated in the form of a note book with a copy sent
to the nearest health facility and copy kept at community with the CBS focal person.
38
Sample pictorial CBS register/note book
Your facilitator will demonstrate sample of a verification tool for unusual health event/signals
When an unusual event/alert is notified by a CBS Focal Person, the health facility/sub-district
team will use this tool to verify whether the event/signal is TRUE or FALSE before notifying the
district team.
39
The following are examples.
Two or more persons presenting with similar severe illnesses in the same community within one week
True if...
False if...
How Community-Based Surveillance (CBS) data is linked with IDSR Data captured at Health
Facilities i.e. Linkage between facility-based surveillance and CBS
(a) All reported cases/unusual events/alerts received from the CBS Focal Persons are captured
in the Sub-district or District Rumours/Outbreaks Log Book (Refer to Section 4, Annex 4A
of the 3rd Edition IDSR TGs)
(b) Health facility/sub-district health team should verify all reports by using verification tools
with support from the district health team
(c) If it is confirmed as TRUE by sub-district/health facility and district team this is then further
investigated using the respective IDSR Case Investigation form and captured on the IDSR
Weekly/monthly summary reporting form by the health facility surveillance focal person of
the respective health facilities catchment area
40
(d) This is then reported to district and subsequently to region and national authorities weekly
and monthly
Your Facilitator will describe the steps involved in investigating and confirming a suspected
public health event/alert reported by CBS Focal Person.
(a) An investigation will provide important and relevant information for determining how to
respond to the suspected case/Public Health Event.
(b) When an event/disease is notified by CBS Focal Person or any community member this
immediately investigated by the health facility/sub-district team.
NOTE: Community-based surveillance focal persons are not community spokespersons and
should not address the community unless they are delegated to do so.
(a) Community-based surveillance focal persons will work within the field response team to:
(i) Organize community briefings for providing regular information following the
directions from national level.
(ii) Identify local powerful channels for delivery of the information to the community.
41
(iii) Meet regularly with local stakeholders to disseminate correct messages to the
community on public health event prevention and surveillance.
(iv) Organize door-to-door campaigns to reach every household within the catchment
area to promote the prevention of the spread of the public health event and to
encourage self-reporting, treatment and health-seeking behaviour among people
who have had contact with the public health event or are suspected to be public
health event cases.
CBS Supervision
(a) The health facility/sub-district team conducts supervisory visits to the CBS Focal Persons at
least once in month.
(b) Supervisory visits are undertaken to determine whether:
(i) The appropriate community-based surveillance supplies such as forms and tally
sheets are available and are used properly.
(ii) The required standard case definitions and guidelines are available.
(iii) The community-based surveillance focal points know how to use the community case
definitions to report suspected public health events in their catchment area.
(iv) The goal of supervision is to improve timeliness of reporting, fine-tune understanding
of case definitions, improve Interpersonal communication skills (IPC skills).
(c) During supervisory visit:
(i) Feedback is given to community-based surveillance focal points.
(ii) On-the-job training is provided as needed if a problem is identified.
(iii) Follow-up on requests for assistance is provided.
(iv) Supervisory plans for improvement of surveillance and response are updated.
(v) Successful activities are recorded and encouragement for their continuation
provided.
(vi) Feasible solutions are provided for identified problems.
Your Facilitator will explain in details of what happens during monitoring and supervision of
community-based surveillance
After the presentations and discussions, your Facilitator will now introduce you to the exercises.
You will now practice the exercises 2, 3, and 4 as below.
42
43
5.5.1 Exercise 2
Exercise 2
Exercise: Reporting a public health event and maintaining community register at the
community level.
In this exercise you will practice how to complete CBS reporting forms.
Instructions
Use the copies of the community case definitions for cholera, meningitis, viral haemorrhagic
fever, avian influenza, malaria and acute flaccid paralysis, to complete and submit the following:
1. Community alert reporting form
2. Community-Based Surveillance Suspected Diseases and Public Health Events Monthly Log
Sheet
5.6.2 Exercise 3
Exercise 3
Instructions:
Read through the case study for Exercise 3 and then answer all the questions that follows in a
group of 4 to 5. Refer to Section 11 of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical Guidelines Booklet Six for
information to answer the questions.
After answering the questions your Facilitator will ask you to select a group leader to present the
answers during plenary discussions.
44
Case Study: A suspected cholera outbreak
On 1 April 2017, Josephine, a 25year-old fishmonger from the Kotoku neighbourhood in Manshi
town, Dambo district, complained that she had severe watery diarrhoea for a day. She also
vomited twice that morning. She lives in the same household with her three children, husband
and stepmother. There have been episodes of cholera in the neighbouring Ganata district over
the last three months. Josephine travelled there three days previously for her auntie’s wedding.
Questions
1. What outbreaks are you familiar with in your catchment area and from the adjacent area
(across the border)?
2. What is cholera?
45
5. Using the community case definition for cholera, discuss within your group if Josephine
should be suspected of having cholera
6. Since Josephine has not visited a health clinic, what should the community do?
7. What action do you think that the community-based surveillance focal person should take?
46
5.6.3 Exercise 4
Exercise 4
Participants Instructions
Read through the case study for Exercise 4. Then answer all the questions that follow in a group
of 4 to 5. Refer to Sections 11 of the 3rd Edition IDSR Technical Guidelines Booklet Six whilst
answering the questions.
After answering the questions your Facilitator will let you select a group leader to present the
answers during plenary discussions.
Three brothers from the Dogbera Family residing in Torkorsu community, went to trap wild
animals for meat in Budunu forest reserve in early December 2017. They managed to catch one
limping monkey and some bats, which they killed, roasted and ate as they looked for more game
to take home and sell. Two days later, the younger brother fell sick with a high fever, a headache,
muscle pain, abdominal pain, diarrhoea and vomiting of blood. He could hardly walk, so his
siblings carried him but he died on the way home. Soon after, the elder brother also fell ill but
refused to go to hospital fearing arrest by government authorities.
Questions
47
3. Is viral haemorrhagic fever dangerous? If Yes, Why?
5. Can viral haemorrhagic fever spread to or from an adjacent area, i.e. across a border?
6. Using the community case definition for viral haemorrhagic fever, discuss within your group
if the Dogbera brothers should be suspected of having viral haemorrhagic fever.
7. Since the Dogbera brothers are known to not have yet visited the clinic, what should the
community do?
48
8. What action should the community-based surveillance focal point take?
49
6. SUMMARY OF COURSE 1:
POINTS TO REMEMBER
(a) IDSR is a strategy for coordinating and integrating surveillance activities at all levels
(b) Event-based surveillance is based on screening of all available information to detect any event
happening in the community
(c) Animal and human health workers should be engaged at all levels to generate information for
IDSR to facilitate information sharing and joint rapid response activities
(d) IDSR is an important tool in the DRM, as it provides early warning information, which is crucial
for risk assessment and risk reduction
(e) Reportable diseases and PHEICs are a global problem with enormous personal, social and
economic costs. IDSR provides TGs for performing systematic surveillance, reporting and
disease response
(f) An effective Community-based surveillance (CBS) system is key to early detection and
response to public events and emergencies
(g) In CBS, there are identified Community focal person(s) who report alerts and rumours of
diseases, conditions or events to the designated focal point at the nearby local health
facilities/sub-districts
(h) It is important that all community members are oriented in surveillance so that they actively
participate in detecting, reporting, responding to and monitoring health events related to
human or animal in their catchment area
(i) If an immediate reportable disease, condition or public health event is detected Community
focal person(s) should report within 24 hours to the nearby local health facilities/sub-districts
(j) Health facility/sub-district health team should verify all reports by using verification tools with
support from the district health team
7. REFERENCES
(a) Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Technical Guidelines, Third Edition,
WHO AFRO, 2019
(b) International Health Regulations (2005), Third edition, WHO 2016
(c) https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/security/pdf/ghsa_ap_factsheet.pdf
(d) Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) Third Edition,
WHO AFRO. 2018
(e) Integrated Diseases Surveillance and Response in the African Region Community-Based
Surveillance (CBS): Training Manual: WHO AFRO. 2015
(f) Guidelines for Community-Based Surveillance System in Ghana, GHS. March 2017
50