The difference between the Chance cause and Assignable cause is
given as follows:
Chance cause:
A form of variation noticed in a quantitative feature, process, or
measurement that is attributable to a random change in any aspect
involved until the output is received is known as the chance cause.
It's also considered a "natural cause", and it doesn't produce a lot of
variance in the output.
Mild vibration of a production machine, for example, because it is no
longer in operation.
Assignable cause:
The assignable cause is a sort of variation that has affected the result
owing to a deviation due to a particular reason that can be easily
found through troubleshooting.
It's also known as a "special cause" and it can produce a lot of
variation in an output.
For example, due to faulty raw materials, the entire batch of tablets
was determined to be defective.
Common-cause variations[edit]
Common-cause variation is characterised by:[citation needed]
Phenomena constantly active within the system;
Variation predictable probabilistically;
Irregular variation within a historical experience base; and
Lack of significance in individual high or low values.
The outcomes of a perfectly balanced roulette wheel are a good example of common-cause
variation. Common-cause variation is the noise within the system.
Walter A. Shewhart originally used the term chance cause.[1] The term common cause was
coined by Harry Alpert in 1947. The Western Electric Company used the term natural pattern.
[2]
Shewhart called a process that features only common-cause variation as being in statistical
control. This term is deprecated by some modern statisticians who prefer the phrase stable and
predictable.
Special-cause variation[edit]
Special-cause variation is characterised by:[citation needed]
New, unanticipated, emergent or previously neglected phenomena within the system;
Variation inherently unpredictable, even probabilistically;
Variation outside the historical experience base; and
Evidence of some inherent change in the system or our knowledge of it.
Special-cause variation always arrives as a surprise. It is the signal within a system.
Walter A. Shewhart originally used the term assignable cause.[3] The term special-cause was
coined by W. Edwards Deming. The Western Electric Company used the term unnatural pattern
Common causes[edit]
Inappropriate procedures
Poor design
Poor maintenance of machines
Lack of clearly defined standard operating procedures
Poor working conditions, e.g. lighting, noise, dirt, temperature, ventilation
Substandard raw materials
Measurement error
Quality control error
Vibration in industrial processes
Ambient temperature and humidity
Normal wear and tear
Variability in settings
Computer response time
Special causes[edit]
Faulty adjustment of equipment
Operator falls asleep
Defective controllers
Machine malfunction
Fall of ground
Computer crash
Deficient batch of raw material
Power surges
High healthcare demand from elderly people
Broken part
Insufficient awareness
Abnormal traffic (click fraud) on web ads
Extremely long lab testing turnover time due to switching to a new computer system
Operator absent[4]