0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 53 views93 pagesChapter-3 Standard Costing
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
STANDARD COSTING AND
VARIANCE ANALYSIS
Ns eee
Introduction; Meaning and definition of standard cost and standard costing;
Applicability; Standard cost and estimated cost; Standard costing and
budgetary control; Advantages; Limitations; Prelimineries; Variance analysis;
Material variances; Labour variances; Overhead variances; Sales variances;
Disposition of variances; Control ratios; Summary of formulae; Problems
and solutions; Key terms; Examination questions.
Introduction
standard costing is a specialised technique of cost accounting to control the cost. From cost
contzol point of view, ‘what a product should have costed’ is more important than ‘What it
id actually cost. The actual cost is the past cost or historical cost and historical costing
sa system in which actual costs incurred in the past are ascertained.
limitations of Historical Costing
Ascertainment of actual costs does not serve any useful purpose and has certain limitations.
Firstly, such costs are obtained too late and cannot be used for price quotations.
Secondly, historical costs do not serve the purpose of cost control because the cost has
ateady been incurred before cost figures are available for managerial control.
Thirdly, historical costs do not provide any yardstick against which efficiency can be measured.
These limitations encouraged the development of a more satisfactory standard costing approach
tased on predetermined costs. Standard costing is not a method of costing like job order on
Mocess costing. It is a special technique to control costs and can be used in conjunction with
ayy other system like job costing, process costing or marginal costing, etc.
Standard costing is one of the most important tools to control costs. In this technique, all
‘osts are pre-determined, i.e., costs are determined in advance of production. Such pre-determined
fosts are then compared with the actual costs. The difference between the actual costs and
Me-determined costs, known as variances, are then analysed and investigated to know their
isons. Variances are reported to management for taking remedial steps so that actual costs
te to pre-determined or standard costs.
34a
Management Ace
= unt
Meaning and Definition of Standard Cost
rion. Standard cost is thus a criterion cost yy,
‘dency with which actual cost has been incy..."
or target costs that should be inc,
The word standard means ‘a norm’ or a crite!
may be used as a yardstick to measure the effi
In other words, standard costs are pre-determined costs
under efficient operating conditions. Q
According to Chartered Institute of Management Accountants ei Stand
cost is the pre-determined cost based on technical estimates for ae ees and overh,.
{for a selected period of time for a prescribed set of working conditions «
In the words of Brown and Howard, “the standard cost is a predetermined cost which determin,
what each product or service should cost under given circumstances « Thus standard costs. °
planned costs that should be attained under a given set of operating conditions. The main obj.
of standard cost is to look forward and assess what the cost ‘should be’ as distinct from what
the cost has been in the past.
Meaning and Definition of Standard Costing
Standard costing is simply the name given to a technique whereby standard costs are comp, ted
and subsequently compared with the actual costs to find out the differences between the t,
These differences (known as variances) are then analysed to know the causes thereof so a5 ,,
provide a basis of control. The C.LM.A. London has defined standard costing as “the prepara
of standard costs and applying them to measure the variations from actual costs and anaiysi,
the courses of variations with a view to maintain maximum efficiency in production”. Brown ang
Howard have defined it, “as a technique of cost accounting which compares the standard cost «
each product or service with the actual costs, to determine the efficiency of the operations so thy
any remedial action may be taken immediately’.
Steps. Standard costing system involves the following steps :
1. The setting of standard costs for different elements of cost, ie., material, labour ang
overheads.
2. Ascertaining actual costs.
3. Comparing standard with actual costs to determine the differences between the two, know
as ‘variances.
4. Analysing variances for ascertaining reasons thereof.
5. Reporting of these variances and analysis thereof to management for appropriate corective
action, where necessary.
Applicability of Standard Costing
The application of standard costing requires certain conditions to be fulfilled. These are
(a) A sufficient volume of standard products or components should be produced.
(b) Methods, operations and processes should be capable of being standardised.
(0) A sufficient number of costs should be capable of being controlled.
Industries producing standardised products which are repetitive in nature, i.e., industries usind
process costing method, fulfil all the above conditions and thus the system can be used to the
best advantage in such industries. Examples are fertilisers, cement, steel, sugar, etc.
In jobbing industries, it is not worthwhile to develop and employ a full system of standat!
costing. This is because in such industries each job undertaken may be different from anothé!
and setting standards for each job may prove difficult and expensive. In such industries, therefo%ind Variance Analysis
——— 3.3
rt 89
seat oo
stem may be adopted in appropriate circumstance
formed may be of a repetitive Ss
d by setting standard for each
ma 's. For example, certain processes and
ure and thus the principles of standard costing
such process or operation
jal
2 Pons per
* ye apie
sent
costs and Estimated Costs - Comparison
dard costs and estimated costs are predetermined costs computed in advance of production.
oF nei objectives are normally different. The differences between the two are summarised as
wt
nt Mia oe
| _ tet ot SLE Re neal
|Standard cost aims at what the cost | Estimated cost is an assessment of what the
1, ae | SHOULD be. cost WILL be.
[Standard costs are planned costs which are
determined on a scientific basis after
taking into account certain level of
efficiency.
Estimated costs are based on average of the
Past figures, taking into consideration
anticipated changes in future.
pauation to[In standard costing system, standard costs | Estimated costs are used as statistical data
Beats. |ate usually incorporated into the accounts, | for comparing with actual figures. Such costs
from which variances of actual from | are not entered in the books of accounts.
standard are ascertained.
Standard costs are meant to be used for a] Estimated costs may be used in any concem
Use. i
g concern operating on a standard costing | operating on a historical cost system.
system. is
Purpose. | Standard costs serve the purpose of cost | Estimated costs do not serve the purpose of
control. cost control. Such costs serve other purposes,
like quoting selling price of new products,
decision to buy or manufacture, etc.
gandard Costing and Budgetary Control — Comparison
‘Standard costing and budgetary control have the common objective of cost control by establishing
predetermined targets. The actual performances are measured and compared with the predetermined
targets for control purposes. Both the techniques are of importance in their respective fields and
aie complementary to each other.
Toints of Similarity
‘here are certain basic principles which are common to both standard costing and budgetary
control. These are :
1. The establishment of predetermined targets of performance.
. The measurement of actual performance.
3. The comparison of actual performance with the predetermined targets.
4. The analysis of variances between the actual and the standard performance.
5. To take cormrective measures, where necessary.
Points of Difference
Eo spite of so much similarity between standard costing and budgetary control, there are some
differences between the two, which are as follows :3.4
7 7 Budgetary contro
Basis Standard costing ee acontrol
Budgets are compiled for differe,
of the business such as sales, p.
duction, cash, capital expen
and development,
1. Scope. Standard costs are developed mainly for
the manufacturing function and sometimes
also for marketing and administration func-
tions kc
2% Intensity. | standard costing is intensive in applica:| Budgetary contro is extensive in na.
tion as i calls for detailed analysis of| the intensity of analysis tends ot x
variances, less than that in standard costing.
3. Relation to]
accounts, | re-vealed through accounts,
rd costing, varias are usualy In budgetary contol, variances aie
not revealed through accounts any ,°°"™
exercised by statistically putting bys”
actuals side by side
Usefulness, standard costs represent realistic yardsticks| Budgets usually represent an uppoy =
and, are therefore, more useful for con-| spending without considering tie Sfface
trolling and reducing costs. ness of the expenditure in terms of ¢<*™
5. Basis, Standard costs are usually established| Budgets may be based on Previous year,
after considering such vital matters as| without any attention being paid an
production capacity, methods employed and ceny
other factors which require attention when
determining an acceptable level of
efficiency. fi
©. Projection. | Standard cost is a projection of cost| Budget is a projection of financial accoun,
accounts,
ADVANTAGES OF STANDARD COSTING
The advantages to be derived from a system of standard costing will vary from one busines
to another. Much depends upon the degree of sophistication achieved and the acceptance by the
management of utility of the system. Possible advantages are as follows :
1. Effective cost control. The most important advantage of standard costing is that it facilitate
the control of costs. Control is exercised by comparing actual performance with standiad, and
taking action on the basis of variances so revealed.
2. Helps in planning. Establishing standards is a very useful exercise in business planning
which instils in management a habit of thinking in advance.
3. Provides incentives. Standards provide incentives and motivation to work with greater
effort. Schemes may be formulated to reward those who achieve or Surpass the standard. This
increases efficiency and productivity.
dorizing Prices and formulating policies. Standard costs are a valuable aid to managenen
in geterining prices and formulating production policies. For example, prices may be fixe! by
adding a standard margin of profit to standard cost. Similarly, standard costing furnishes cot
estimates while planning production of new products.
ity for off-standard performance
with the persons concerned, an organisation chart is prepared which
ach executive.Pr in i
casting and Variance Analysis
gaciitates Se isle “slablishing standards, the performance of different
gents sucht 38 ion, sales, purchases etc, i roe
cae Meandard cost system, coordination af eis taken into ac a Hi through the
ol ae us functions is achieve
B fimisates wastes. Dy fixing standard, certain waste such as material wastage, idle time,
“machine hours, etc. are reduced, a age,
es eas cating simplifies the valuation of stock because the stock
- gatued at m ne Tence between standard and actual cost is transferred to @
a nce eC ‘orm Pricing of stocks in the form of raw materials, work-in-
id finished goods.
gunanagement by exception. Reporting of variances is based on the principle of management
yFoption. only variances beyond a predetermined limit may be considered by the management
Wi eaetive action. This also reduces the cost of preparing reports
, Economical and simple. Standard costing is an economical and simple means of cost
/ —eounting and generally results in savings in the cost of costing system. It results in reduction
er work in accounting and needs fewer number of forms and records. This leads to
ia Morale saving in clerical labour, 3
UMITATIONS OF STANDARD COSTING
Spec ostinn system may stuffer from certain disadvantages® This may be) because of (=e
sjeaucation and communication and resultant misunderstanding on the part of managerial staff.
fos dsedvantages ae :
4, The system may not be appropriate to the business.
| ress 2
| 2, The staff may not be capable of operating the system.
3, A business may not be able to keep standards up-to-date. In other words, a business may not
| tevise standards to keep pace with the frequent changes in manufacturing conditions. Firms
‘may avoid revising standards as it is a costly affair.
4 Inaccurate and unreliable standards cause misleading results and thus may not enjoy the
confidence of the users of the system.
“5, Operation of the standard costing system is a costly affair and small firms cannot afford it.
6; Standard costing is expensive and unsuitable in job order industries which are manufacturing
non-standardised products.
VARIANCE ANALYSIS
Cost Variance-Difference between standard and actual is known as variance. Cost variance is
the “difference between a standard cost and the comparable actual cost incurred during a period.”
CLM.A., London.
Variance analysis is the process of analysing variances by sub-dividing the total variance in
such away that management can assign responsibility for any off standard performance. According
toCLM.A., London, Terminology, variance analysis is “the process of computing the amount of
variance and isolating the causes of variance between actual and standard.” An important aspect
of variance analysis is the need to separate controllable from uncontrollable variances. A detailed
IN
iDe, SOMONE Ac.
7
3.6 BGM
ant it to identify the persons
analysis of controllable variances will help the panei Persons resp
for its occurrence so that corrective action can
FAVOURABLE AND UNFAVORABLE VARIANCES : Be.
Where the actual cost is less than standard cost, it is Hema votre OF rei va
n the other hand, where the actual cost is more than sta : rece ie
to as ‘unfavourable’, ‘adverse’ or ‘debit’ variance.
has a favourable effect on profit is favourable vari,
ance that f
ET an 1 unfavourable effect on profit is unfavourable
any variance which has an adverse 0
i ining whether a variance is favourabl
ts experience difficulty in ascertaining whether Ss
Bacula book, positive (+) variance will indicate favourable yari,,"™
In the formulae given in this (4 c
negative (-) variance will indicate adverse variance. Favourable variances will be designat,
(F) and Adverse by (A).
CONTROLLABLE AND UNCONTROLLABLE VARIANCES
If a variance can be regarded as the responsibility of a particular person, with the result y,
his degree of efficiency can be reflected in its size, then it is said to be a controllable Vatiane,
For example, excess usage of material is usually the responsibility of the foreman concerneg
However, if the excessive usage is due to material being defective, the responsibility may...
with the Inspection Department for non-detection of the defects. es
Vatiang
If a variance arises due to certain factors beyond the control of management, it is known
uncontrollable variance. For example, change in the market prices of materials, general inoe,,
in the labour rates, increase in the rates of power or insurance premium, etc. are not within,
contzol of the management of the company. Responsibility for uncontrollable variances cannot
assigned to any person or department.
The division of variances into controllable and uncontrollable is extremely important, th
management should place more emphasis on controllable variance as it is these variances why,
require investigation and possibly corrective action. The uncontrollable variances, on the sth
hand, may be ignored. This follows the well known “principle of exception” whereby those matic,
which are going right are ignored and any deviations from efficient performance are investigated,
MATERIAL VARIANCES
Material Cost Variance
This is the difference between the standard cost of direct materials specified for the output
achieved and the actual cost of direct materials used. It is calculated as :
Material Cost Variance = Standard cost of actual output - Actual cost
MCV = SC - AC
Material Cost Variance -|St@ndard quantity Standard] _ [Actual Actual
for actual output “price quantity “price
MCV = (SQ = SP) - (AQ x AP) |(Overhead
Variance
Material
Usage
Variance
Material
terial Labour i
CA Yield ii ste Labour
Varian ime Yield
variance ef | Valence Variance | variance
Variable Overhead
Cost Variance
Expenditure or
Budget Variance
Efficiency
Variance
Expenditure or
Budget Variance
Volume
Variance
Fig. 3.1 Cost Variance Analysis
Bample
‘A fumiture company uses sunmica tops for tables. It provides the following data :
Standard quantity of sunmica per table 4 sq. ft.
Standard price per sq. ft. of sunmica z5
Actual production of tables 1,000
Sunmica actually used 4,300 sq. ft.
Actual purchase price of sunmica per sq. ft. @ 5.50
Material cost variance will be calculated as under :
‘MCV = (SQ « SP) - (AQ x AP)
MCV = (1,000 x 4 x % 5) - (4,300 x & 5.50)38 ee
= 20,000 - 23,650
= 3,650 (A) i 4 ;
he material cost variance may be further divided into price variance and usage ,,.
The material cos
Material Price Variance oan
rial cost variance whic
“that portion of the mate Libs 1 Hi ,
thc tindard price specified and the actual price paid’.* It is calculated by the
formula :
‘Actual price) « Actual quantity
Material Price Variance = (Standard price -
‘MPV = (SP - AP) * AQ
price and actual price multiplied by actua|g
Thus, this is the difference between standard
Example
With the figures in Example given above, the material price
MPV = (SP - AP) « AQ
MPV = (5 - 5.50) * 4,300
= % 2,150 (A)
asons for Material price Variance. This variance usually arises due to the fol,
variance will be calculated as
Rei
reasons :
1, Change in the market prices of materials.
2, Failure to purchase the specified quality, thereby resulting in a different price being pais
3, Change in the quantity of materials purchased, thereby leading to lower/hisher qua»
discount.
Not availing cash discounts, when standards set took into account such discounts.
Inefficient purchasing.
. Change in the delivery costs.
/. Rush purchases.
Purchase of a substitute material on account of non-availability of the material specified
. Change in the rates of excise duty, purchase tax, etc.
10, Off-season purchasing for certain seasonal products like jute, cotton, ete.
ern eaes
Material Usage (or Quantity) Variance
This is “that portion of the material cost variance which is due to the difference between te
standard quantity specified and the actual quantity used”. Its formula is :
* C.LM.A., London Terminologya
9
-
| Material Usage Variance ~
= Muy
this i the difference between standatd q
van
es,
ce.
pat
some
caging example given above, mate
contin tial usage variance will be
MOV» (S0.= 40) » 5p iat ‘ll be caleulated as under :
ity and actual quantity multiplied by the
= (4,000 - 4,300) « 5
= © 1,500 (A)
we the following reasons tial usage variance may be caused by some
{. the of defective or sub-standard materials
>. Caelessness in the use of materials
3, Piferage.
«Poor workmanship.
§, Defect in plant and machinery.
6. Change in the design or specification of the product.
7, Change in the quality of materials.
§, Use of substitute materials.
¢, Use of non-standard material mixture.
40. Yield from materials in excess of or less than standard yield.
eck yl
the algebraic sum of material price variance and material usage variance should be equal to
‘saterial cost variance. Thus :
MCV = MPV + MUV
3,650 (A) = & 2,150 (A) + © 1,500 (A) i
figure 3.2 shows the graphic analysis of material variances which has been prepared with the 4
guns of the above example. In this chart, the solid lines rectangle indicates the standard cost '
tatoo » & 5) and the dotted rectangle shows the actual cost (4,300 x & 5.50).
MPV = (5 -7% 5.50) x 4,300 = 7 2,150 (A)
MUV = (6,000 ~ 4,300) «5 = © 1,500 (A)
The difference between the areas of standard cost rectangle and the actual cost rectangle Le.
shaded area represents material cost variance, which has been analysed into material price
raiance and material usage variance. The variances are adverse because the actual cost rectangle
‘s lager in size than the standard cost rectangle.
aa3.10
0 ‘Quantity in sq. ft. 4,000 4,300
Fig. 3.2 Analysis of Material Cost Variance.
TMustration 3.1
The standard cost card shows the following details relating to material needed to p44,
kg. of groundnut oil -—
Quantity of groundnut required 3 kg,
Price of groundnut % 2.50 per kg.
‘Actual production data
Production during the month 1,000 kg.
Quantity of material used 3,500 kg.
Price of groundnut 3 per kg.
Calculate : (2) Material Cost Variance (b) Material Price Variance (c) Material Usage y,,i,
BCom, coi
Solution
Basic Data
Standard Quantity (SQ) = 1,000 kg. of production x 3 kg. = 3,000 kg.
Standard Price (SP) = © 2.50 per kg.
Actual quantity (AQ) = 3,500 kg.
‘Actual price (AP) = ©3 per kg.
Calculation of Variances
(a) Material Cost Variance = SC - AC
= (SQ « SP) - (AQ = AP)
= (3,000 x 2.50) - (3,500 x 3) = & 3,000 (A)
(b) Material Price Variance = (SP - AP) x AQ
= (2.50 ~ 3) x 3,500 = @ 1,750 (A)
(c) Material Usage Variance = (SQ - AQ) x SP
(3,000 - 3,500) x 2.50 = %1,250(4)
Check
Material Cost Variance = Price Variance + Usage Variance
3,000 (A) = 1,750 (A) + 1,250(A)i ii
P ting and Variance Analysis
dard C0
ion of Material Usages Variance _
sot
ee
ssificatl
terial usage variance is further sub
a
divided into
| atrial mix variance
ip) Material yield variance, (Or Material sub-usage yarian
‘ ariance)
sotesat Mix Veriance
a
1 f material
js sub-variance o} lal usage variance, It arises
In Sted fr produig the fine melt Mt only where more than on type ot
matefials which does not comply with the pany may be using a mixture o
i Predetermined st
rial mix variance.
terial mix variance is defined as that
qhe materia b Portion of the material usage variance which is
ne ee nes ee, and actual composition of materials. It may arise in
sties is Peer at, big 2 number of raw materials are mixed to produce a
| product Migietuix or due ‘ard ‘mix may be due to non-availability of one or more
ments of © ron-Purchase of materials at proper time. Increase in the
rable mix variance and vice versa, the use of more
Fepensive a s in adverse variance.
|“ tis variance is calculated with the help of the following formula ;
Spaces. ase with the help of the following formula :
‘andard mixture. This gives rise to
patel
(Revised standard Actual) srangang |
{quantity quantity )* ~ price
MMV = (RSQ - AQ) x 5}
The revised standard quantity is nothing but the standard proportion of total of actual
quantities of all the materials, This is calculated as under
Material mix variance =
| pso = Satara quantity ofone material Total of actual quantities
Total of standard quantities of all materials ofall materials
Mlustration 3.2
From the following data, calculate material mix variance. Also calculate price and usage
variances.
Raw material Standard Actual
ve 40 units @ @ 50 per unit 50 units @ & 50 per unit
ae 60 units @ % 40 per unit 60 units @ & 45 per unit
Total 100 units 110 units
Solution
Gleulation of Revised Standard Quantity (RSQ).
40
RSQ of X =755 * 110 = 46 units
0 a
RSQ of Y =755 * 110 = 66 unitsMaterial Mix Variance = (RSQ - AQ) « SP
Material X = (44 - 50) x 50
Material Y = (66 - 60) x 40
uMY
Material Price Variance = (SP - AP) « AQ
Material Y = (50 - 50) x 50
Material ¥ = (40 - 45) * 60
‘My
Material Usage Variance = (SQ - AQ) « SP
Material X = (40 - 50) x 50
Material Y = (60.- 60) x 40
‘MuV = %500 (A)
Material Sub-usage (or Material Revised Usage) Variance
This is a sub-variance of the material usage variance and represents that Portion
material usage variance which is attributed to reasons other than those which Give
material mix variance. Thus the algebraic sum of this revised usage variance and Mate
variance is equal to material usage variance. Its formula is : Mal ay
of
Material revised _ (Standard _ Revised standard).
| age varane = auantly quant, 4)» Standard pie |
Se ee
MRUV. = (SQ.- RSQ) * SP
In Illustration 3.2 material revised usage variance is calculated as follows
‘MRUV = (SQ - RSQ) « SP
X = (40 - 44) x50 = 200 (A)
¥ = (60-66) x 40 = % 240 (A)
MRO = © 440 (A)
Check
MOV = MMV + MRUV
500(A) = 60 (A) + 440 (A)
Material Yield Variance
This is also a sub-variance of material usage variance. It arises in process industries, tis
chemicals, where loss of materials in production is inevitable. While setting standards, the none
or standard loss is taken into account. But actual loss may differ from normal or standard lox
This results in actual yield or output being different from standard yield.
Thus material yield variance is that portion of the material usage variance which is due to th
difference between standard yield specified and actual yield obtained. The standard yield ist»
cutput expected to be obtained from the actual usage of raw materials. It should be noted tht
yield variance as used in standard costing is the same thing as abnormal loss ot abnormal 32°
in the other costing systems.ne
is oa csting and Variance Analysis
dort 3.13
ure of yield vy. 3
ortant feature of ariance which different
one iPr and mix variances) is that yield vay Vferentiates it from other material variances
pes sriances. In other words, yield variance represents once Put Variance while others are
Moat Yaaryetion, while other variances represent a gain oon, ots on output i tetas of
| ste as follows 4 gain or loss on the cost of material input.
w Material Yield (Actual Standard) Stang d
Variance | yield yielg output price
| MYV = (AY - SY) x Sop
tput price (SOP) is the standa
sandard output P Standard material cost per unit of output.
station 33
poring che month of May, the following data applies
2 er
a Price "Amount | “Units Price Amount
9. e z Kg. z z
x 60 25 1,500 56 25 1,400
Y 40 50 2,000 4 502,200
Total 100 3,500 100 3,600
ess: Loss. 30 26
Yield 70 14
qhe standard loss is 30%. Calculate:
(2) Material yield variance (b) Material mix variance.
solution
(o) Material Yield Variance = (AY - SY) x SOP
MYV = (74 ~ 70) x 50° = & 200 (F)
‘standard material cost per unit of output is calculated as follows :
Standard material cost _% 3,500
S0P = “Standard output 797 © 5°
(t) Material Mix Variance = (RSQ - AQ) = SP
Material X = (60 - 56) x 25 = 100 (F)
Material Y = (40 - 44) x 50 = % 200 (A)
‘MMV = %100 (A)
Note, In this case, standard quantity and revised standard quantity (RSQ) is the same because total
‘tual quantity of all the materials and total standard quantity is the same, i.e., 100 units.3.14
Material A 60 units @ € 15 per unit 900
uneeinh DS > 00 ants, @ @)80ipar acts 1,600
Material C100 units @ © 25 per unit 2 300
240 units 5,000
During the month of Duly, 10 units were actually Produced and consumption
Meret A 640 units @ 17.80 per unit. 15 200 WMS 28 oy
Naterial B 950 units @ & 19.00
Material C _870 units @ & 27.50
2460 units
52,225
Catculate all material variances, (BCom. Hons. Dethi Ada a
ted
Solution $
Material
Standard cost ~ Actual cost
= € 50,000 = & 52,225 (a)
MCV = & 2,225(a)
Material A = (15 ~ 17.50) « 640 = 1,600 (a)
Material B= (20 - 18) x 950
Material C\— = (2515527450) 5/870. «= €o.a75,44
MPV = %1,875 (A)
3. Material Usage Variance ~ (st.dty. - Actual ty.) « St. Price
piterial A. = (600 - 640) x 15 = &.600 (a)
Material B= (800 - 950) x 20 = €3,000 (A)
Material C= (1,000 - 870) x 25 _= 83.250 (F}
MOV = % 350 (A)
4 Material Mix Variance = (Revised St. Qty. — Actual Qty.) = 50 Price
Material A. == (615%,- 640). «15. = ¥.375,(a)
Material B - (820" - 950) x 20 = 2,600 (a)
Material C= (1,025° - 870) « 25 = €3,875 (F)_
MMV = © 900 (F)5
Wy cmos ond variance Anaiyns 3A
ord COSTS
a Quantity (RSQ) is calculated
standard as follow:
ages 2460
Material A = 3459 * 600 = 615 unit
2460
Material B= 3;55 * 800 = 620 units
2460
Material C= 5455 * 1,000 1,025 units
Gaterot wield Variance
med via, certain basic calculations have to be made as follows
yi
Re Actual usage of materials 2460
Fandand usage per unit of output “g4g 7 10-25 units
gandard vied”
material cost per unit of output) = & 50,000 + 10 units = © 5,000
ce = (AY - SY) x SOP
MYV = (10 - 10,25) * 5,000 = © 1,250(A)
(st ‘
stent Wied Varian
nevised Usage (or Sub-usage) Variance (MRUV)
yaterial
Beppe coity Revived Standard Quantity) x Standard Price
Material A = (600 - 615) = 15 = % 225(A)
Material B = (800 - 820) » 20 = % 400(A)
Material C = (1,000 - 1,025) x 25 = % 625(A)
‘MRUV = €1,250(A)
ote, sither MV or MRUV is calculated. These two are always equal.
check
0 ‘MUV = MMV + MYV (Or MRUV)
= 350 (A) = © 900 (F) + & 1,250 (A)
or
(i ‘MCV = MPV + MMV + MYV (Ox MRUV)
2,225 (A) = © 1,875 (A) + & 900 (F) + & 1,250 (A)
LABOUR VARIANCES
the analysis and computation of labour variances is quite similar to material variances.
labour Cost Variance
This is the difference between the standard direct labour cost specified for the acti
achieved and the actual direct labour cost incurred. It is calculated as under :
Labour Cost Variance = ¢Jfasmel ouput ~ an
Lev = SC = AC
or,
‘St.hours ‘Strate ] ie ‘Actual cal
Labour Cost Variance = x
ange ( for actual output ™ per hour) ~\ hours. * per hour
LCV = (SH SR) - (AH x AR)LL
Managem uy
ois a EEN a
Example
The following information is given :
6
Stabe © per hour
Actual data
1000 units
Actual production
atk 15,300 hours
Actual hours
Actual rate
Calculate labour cost variance. ,
% 3.90 per hour
Solution
Labour Cost Variance = (Sif for actual output « SR) ~ (AH « AR)
= (1,000 x 15 * 4) = (15,300 « 3.90)
Ley = © 330 (F)
Labour cost variance is further divided into rate variance Sind efficiency variance
Labour Rate Variance
This is that portion of the labour cost variance which is due to the difference hety,
standard rate specified and the actual rate paid. Its formula is : een ty,
[Labour Rate Variance = (Standard rate - Actual rate) = Actual hours |
IRV = (SR - AR) x AH
: Thus this is the difference between standard and actual rates of wages, multiplied ty
ours. hy
Example
Using the data given in above example :
IRV = (SR - AR) x AH
= (4 - 3.90) x 15,300 = & 1,530 (F)
Reasons for labour rate variance. Usual reasons are :
1, Change in the basic wage rates.
2. Use of a different method of wage payment.
3. Employing workers of grades different from the standard grades specified.
4. Unscheduled overtime.
5. New workers not being paid at full rates.
Often, labour rate variance will be an uncontrollable variance as labour rates are us,
determined by demand and supply conditions in the labour market, backed by negotiable steno
of the trade union. Where this variance is due to the use of a grade of labour other than tnt
specified, there may well be such acceptable explanations as non-availability of the labour gris
specified. But when a foreman carelessly employs a wrong grade of labour on a job, he may
held responsible.
Labour Time (or Efficiency) Variance
This is that portion of the labour cost variance which is due to the difference between labo:
hours specified for actual output and the actual labour hours expended. This variance is calculated
as follows : :— 3.17 7
eee Efficiency Variance
actual output
| i hours} * Standard rate
V = (SH - au
ance is the difference ber, = SR
ust vari ference between Standard and
_ actual time valued at standard rate.
| Mang the data given in above example
LEV = (SH for actual output - AH) « sp
= (15,000 ~ 46 ie
5,300) x 4 =
spe total of labour rate variance and labour Head 5 Sano AY
hos: ¥ variance is equal to labour cost
van LCV = LRV + Ley
© 330 (Ff) = & 1,5
towing reasons :
working conditions, e, i
E Fire i Baris: ae ae Ughting and ventilation, excessive heating, etc.
3, Inefficient workers.
4, Incompetent supervision.
5, Use of defective or non-standard materials,
6, Time wasted by factors like waiting for mate
7, Insufficient training of workers,
8, Change in the method of operation,
9, Non-standard grade of workers.
ane fol
tials, tools or machine break-down, etc.
ussification of Labour Efficiency Variance
labour efficiency variance is further divided into the following sub-variances.
(@) Idle time variance
(b) Labour mix variance |
(©) Labour Yield Variance (or Labour revised-efficiency variance) 4
Idle Time Variance }
‘This variance represents that portion of the labour efficiency variance which is due to abnormal
ile time, such as time lost due to machine break-down, power failure, strike, etc. It is calculated
‘by valuing idle hours at standard rate. Thus:
Idle Time Variance = Idle hours x Standard rate |
ITV = IH SR
As idle hours represent a loss, idle time variance is always unfavourable.
Some accountants do not treat Idle Time Variance as a part of labour efficiency variance but
leat it as a part of labour cost variance.
Lea8 Menedengy,
Example
Using the data give in the above example and further assuming that idle time j,
then the idle time variance would be: 2
ITV = 200 4 = % 800 (A)
When idle time variance is treated as a sub-variance of labour cost variance ang ,.
efficiency variance, then for labour efficiency variance, the actual time would 4, "°* of
= 15,100 hours, Labour efficiency variance will be calculated on the basis of 15,1.
Labour Efficiency Variance = (SH - AH) x SR
= (15,000 - 15,100) x 4 = % 400 (A)
In this case, the total of Labour Rate Variance, Labour Efficiency Varian,
Variance would be equal to Labour Cost Variance. Thus
LV = LRV + LEV + ITV
330 (F) = 1,530 (F) + 400 (A) + 800 (A)
Labour Mix Variance (Gang Composition Variance)
0 hour, 2
ee and tay,
This variance is similar to material mix variance. It arises only when mor
workers are employed and the composition of actual grade of workers differ f
It is calculated with the help of following formula :
Hee
Revised standard Actual
Labour Mix Variance = ( rH ereeee at fee) % Standard rate
LMV = (RSH ~ AH) x SR
SS |
Mlustration 3.5
fe than one '
rom those 50,
Coates India Ltd. manufactures a particular product, the standard direct labour cost g
is & 120 per unit whose manufacture involves the following : mig
Grade of Hours Rate Amount
workers z z
A 30 2 60
B 20 3 _60_
50, 120
See a a A ee
During a period, 100 units of the product were produced, the actual labour cost of viich re
as follows : "|
Grade of Hours Rate Amount
workers fe z
A 3,200 1.50 4,800
5 1,900 4.00 7,600
5,100, 12,400
Calculate (a) Labour Cost Variance (6) Labour Rate Variance
(c) Labour Efficiency Variance (d) ‘Labour Mix Variance.Variance Analysis 3.19
Standard for 100 units Fetual for 100
Hours Rate Amt. |. Nowe Rate Amt.
¢ ? ¢
3,000 2 6,000 3,200 1.50 4,800
2,000 3 6,000 | 1900 4.00 7,600
5,00 | mB;
— 000 12,000 | $100
tabour Cost Variance » SC = AC
(o) LCV = 12,000 = 12,400 =@ 400 (A)
py about Rate Variance = (SR = AR) « AH
Oo A = (2 = 1.50) * 3,200 = 2 1,600 (F)
B = (3 = 4,00) « 1,900 =% 1,900 (A)
Lav = ®% _ 300 (A)
ig our Eificlecy Variance (SH AH) » SE
A = (3,000 - 3,200) « 2 =% 400 (A)
B = (2,000 - 1,900) x 3 =% _ 300 (F
LEV =® _ 100 (A)
ae LCV = LRV + LEV
400 (A) = 300(A) + 100(A)
(g) Labour Mix Variance = (RSH* - AH) « SR
A. = (3,060 - 3,200) « 2 =% 280 (A)
B = (2,040 ~ 1,900) = 3 =% _ 420 (F)
IMv = &% _ 140 (F)
stalculation of Revised Standard Hours (RSH)
‘St. hours of the grade , 041 actual hours
aSH =
Total st. hours
2
p= 22% 5,100 3,060 hrs. Grade B= 2° 5 100 2,040 hrs.
5,000 5,000
Labour Revised Efficiency Variance. (01 Labour Sub-efficiency Variance) This is similar to
Material Revised Usage Variance and is a sub-variance of labour efficiency variance. It arises due
to factors other than those which give rise to idle time variance and labour mix variance. Thus,
this is a residue of labour efficiency variance left after idle time and mix variance have been
‘separated. Its formula is :
Sthours for _ Revised).
actual output ~ st. hours )* S*T#€
LREV = (SH - RSH) = SR
Labour Revised Efficiency Variance = (Using the data given in Illustration 3.5.
Labour Revised Efficiency Variance = (SH - RSH) x SR
Grade A = (3,000 - 3,060) x 2 = 120 (A)
Grade B = (2,000 - 2,040) x 3 = %120 (A)
LREV = %240 (A)
Check
LEV = LMV + LREV
© 100(A) = & 140 (F) + % 240 (A)
Labour Yield Varlance. This is quite similar to Material Yield Variance. This Vatian
the effect on labour cost of actual output or yield being more or less than tthe stands."
Its formula + lard Vie
Labour Yield Variance = (
~ _St-labour cog;
Ber unit of out
‘Actual _ . yield )
yield ~ from actual input,
Mlustration 3.6
Standard output 500 units,
Actual output 450 units,
Standard time 1000 hrs.
Standard rate % 20 per hour.
Calculate Labour Yield Variance
Solution
St. time per unit = 1000 hrs + 500 units = 2 hrs.
St. cost per unit = 2 hrs @ 20 = & 40.
‘Actual St. cost per unit
yield. of output
= (450 ~ 500) = % 40 = © 2,000 (a)
Labour Yield Variance = ( a se yea) *
Mlustration 3.7
The standard labour employment and the actual labour engaged in a week for a Job are a5 unde,
Skilled Semi-skilled Unskiled
workers workers worker
Standard no. of workers in the gang 32 1 6
‘Actual no. of workers employed 28 18 ‘
Standard wage rate per hour 3 G 1
‘Actual wage rate per hour 4 3 2
During the 40 hours working week, the gang produced 1,800 standard labour hours of weit
Calculate :
(a) Labour Cost Variance (b) Labour Rate Variance
(0) Labour Efficiency Variance (@) Labour Mix Variance
(e) Labour Yield Variance (B.Com Hons Deli)Ba EE Standard I]
catego! ree Rate amoung sod
op otters pene CP |
Se 1,280 3 seo | 1120
geoisrted 480 2 as i
nstiled BE hOB ai uo ta
ae Bere 2 5,040 2,000
Tne. of workers x 40 hours. eee
at =
Renee ey
ste cost jofpactual:outp! 2,000 hrs * 1,800 hrs. = % 4,536
our cost variance’ = St cot of actual output ~ Actual cost
a LCV = % 4,536 - 6,960 = %2,424 (A)
apour Rate variance = (SR- AR) « AH
Skilled = (3 - 4) «1,120 = @ 1,120 (A)
semi-skilled = (2 - 3) x 720 =% 720(A)
unskilled = (1 - 2) x 160 =% 160 (A)
Lav = %2,000 (A)
"SH for actual output - AH) x SR
avout Efficiency Variance-
Skilled = (1,152 - 1,120) x 3 96 (F)
Semi-skilled = (432 - 720) x 2 576 (A)
Unskilled = (216 - 260) x 1 56 (F)
LEV = © 424 (A)
sce. ins. for actual output are calculated as follows :
1,800
Skilled => p99 * 1280 = 1,152 hrs.
= 1,800
Semi-skilled -7 999 * 480 = 432 hrs.
1,800
= 216 hrs.
‘Unskilled = 2,000 = 240
Labour Mix Variance. = (Revised st. hrs. - AH) = SR.
Skilled = (1,280 - 1,120) «3 = % 480 (F)
Semi-skilled = (480-720) * 2 =% 480 (A)
Unskilled = (240 - 160) x 1 =% 80 (F)
Imv =% 80 (F)(Actual _ St. output for)
Labour Yield Variance = (output ~ actual hours) * Strate per hour of work
5,040
00 © 504 (A)
LYV = (1,800 - 2,000) « 35
cheek
0) Lev = LRV + LEV
© 2,424 (A) = & 2,000 (A) + & 424 (A)
w) LEV = LMV + LYV
© 424 (A) = © 80 (F) + & 504 (A)
OVERHEAD VARIANCES
Overhead is the aggregate of indirect materials, indirect labour and indirect
of overhead variances is different from that of direct material and direct La
Xs considered to be a difficult part of variance analysis. There are mainly tre Teasons
difficulty. Firstly, standard overhead rate for fixed overhead is difficult t. establish pot th
changes in the volume of output will distort this rate even though there ig 10 change *“
amount of fixed overhead cost, Generally fixed overhead absorption rate is determines te
basis of normal volume of output. Secondly, there is conflicting terminology sr differen
of computing overhead variances. Overhead variances may be Separately computed fo,
overheads and variable overheads. Then there are two Variance, three variance and fou, ariet
methods of analysing overhead variances. Moreover, overhead rate may be per hour or yer
of output. All these lead to confusion in overhead variance analysis. me
expenses 4.
bour variances
In this book, overhead variances have been classified into fixed and variable over
thead vatianes,
and then further analysed according to causes.
It is important to understand at the outset that ovethead variance is nothin
over-absorption of overhead. Certain basic terms used in connection with overhe
explained first of all.
9 but unde ,
ad variances 40
jtandard Overhead Rate: This overhead absorption rate may be computed Per hour
follows :
Standard overhead _ Budgeted overhead
tate (per hour) Budgeted hours
Where overhead variances are separately computed for fixed and variable ovetheads, separate
overhead rates are to be computed for fixed overhead and variable overhead,
Computation of Variances
The following basic calculations should be made before computing variances.
(a) Standard hours for actual output (SHAQ). It is required to be calculated when overhead ae
absorbed on the basis of overhead rate per hour. It is calculated as under :
Budgeted hours
SHAO ~ Budgeted output * Actual outputee
ting ane
eo
fed (or Recovered) overhead
0 sor
4 overhead
rand
@
@
ee
puiseted overhead
ce ead cost.” Thus, this variance
it ean
ree
oat ( St, hours for
panple
Budgeted output
Budgeted hours
Budgeted overhead
‘Actual overhead
Actual output
aalate Overhead Cost Variance (OCV),
solution
he total overhead variance and can
hs verhead absorbed and total actual overhe:
ooh erence between the standard cost of overhead absorbed in the output achieved and tHe
arises due to the actual overhead incurred differing
jard overhead absorbed and is simply under or over absorption of overheads. Its
Overhead Cost Variance = Absorbed overhead
423
St. hrs
actatta for St. overhead
Rena aut * tale pet hour
tual st
x St. ovethead
hours. * rai peed
_ Budgeted — s¢. 9. 7
hours * rate per hour
Actual
Actual overhead
hours * “rate per hour
be ie Tibed as the difference between total
‘ad incurred. C.1.M.A., London has defined it
Actual overhead
St. overhead
actual output absorption rate) ~ Actual overhead
10,000 units.
10,000
20,000
22,000
12,000 units.
Budgeted overhead
i =Budgeted everticnd 52212,20,000)
. overhead absorption rate Budgeted ours “yaopeee ~ © 2 pet hour
10,000 hrs,
hours for actual output —— = 75 909 ynigg * 12,000 units = 12,000 hours.
Ocv = (12,000 « 2) - % 22,000
= © 2,000 (F)
‘ovethead Cost Variance is divided into variable overhead and fixed overhead variances.
\WRIABLE OVERHEAD (VO) VARIANCES
Yariable Overhead Cost Variance : It may be defined as the difference between absorbed
‘saiable overhead and actual variable overhead. Its formula is :
Variable Overhead _{ St.hours for St. variable | _ Actual overhead
Cost Variance actual output overhead rate cost
VOCV = (Absorbed V.0. - Actual V.0.)na! _ oes.
This variance is sub-divided into the following two variances :
dditure Variance. This is also known as Spengi,,
he difference between standard yay) Yr,
(a) Variable Overhead Expen
Budget Variance. This variance arises due to t f
allowed and actual variable overhead incurred. Its formula is: .
St.variable , Actual) _ Actual overheag
V0. Expenditure Variance = | jverhead rate * hours ot
= (Standard ¥.0, - Actual ¥.0.)
(b) Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance. This variance arises due to the differen,
standard hours allowed for actual output and actual hours. The reasons for this Variant *tng,
same which give rise to labour efficiency variance. Its formula is as follows: nce are
| “0. Efficiency Variance = | jewal output hours ) ” overhead rate
| = Absorbed V.0. - Standard ¥.0.
Check pee
V.O, Expenditure , V.O. Efficiency
V0. Cost’ Variance =." “'yateme +” Variance.
Mlustration 3.8
Calculate variable overhead variances from the following :
Budgeted Actual
Output (units) 20,000 19,000
Hours 5,000 4,500
Overhead - Fixed = 10,000 10,500
Variable % 5,000 4,800
Solution
Basic calculations :
(a) Ses rauaablede Budock over Bend Santas OURS ester aa
overhead rate “Budgeted hours 5,000hours
St. hours for actual Budgeted hours 5,000
= ——————-x Actual it = «19,
) output Budgeted output * A‘*¥2! MPM = 29 ogg * 19,000
= 4,750 hours.
Caleulation of Variance
St. hrs. ic
(a) Variable Overhead Cost Variance = (oes, Tote ees
= (4,750 x 1) - 4,800 = & 50 (A).
(b) Expenditure Variance = (Actual hours x St. rate) - Actual variable overhead
= (4,500 x 1) - 4,800 = & 300 (A).
(c) Efficiency Variance = ( ee jae Strate
= (4,750 - 4,500) x1 = & 250 (F)sa voice Anas 3.25
and vor
lure Variance + Ey
- EY
ct
riety (a) + 250 (F)
oe a)” ”
(f0) VARIANCES
cost Variance. It is the difference between standard fixed overhead cost for
g anette sorbed overhead) and actual fixed overhead. tts formula is
east OE Shows for. SFO, ey
rl
= Absorbed overhead = Actual overhead.
saad cost variance is sub-divided into the following two variances
goto yead Expenditure Variance, This is also known as Spending Valance of Budget
ae gue to the difference between budgeted fixed overhead and actual fixed
es formule is
mditure Budgeted _ Actual |
ere = fixed overhead ~ fixed overhead
‘ head Volume Variance. This variance arises due to the difference between
ae ne snd actual output. It is defined as that portion of overhead variance which arises
ae uMerence between standard cost of overhead absorbed by actual production and the
i alarance for that output.
ey ume _{St-hours for Budgeted
=(actual output hours) * St- rate
FO. Volume
Variance
= Absorbed Overhead ~ Budgeted Overhead.
fred _ Budgeted fixed overhead _ 10,000
5 ate
ead rate” Budgeted hours 5.000 hs, © *
hows for _ _ Budgeted hrs.
E x Actual output
output” Budgeted output * ““¥a" outP™
x 19,000 = 4,750 hrs.
~ 20,000
of Variances
Overhead Cost Variance
St. hours for ‘Actual fixed
in es output * S* rte) - ‘overhead
= (4,750 x 2) = 10,500 = © 1,000 (A)3.26 > ace
(®) Fixed Overhead Expenditure Variance
dgeted Actual
= Srothoed ~ overhead
= 10,000 - 10,500 = © 500 (A)
(©) Fixed Overhead Volume Variance
St. hrs. for _ Budgeted). 5+ raty
= [actual output ~ hours
= (4,750 = 5,000) x & 2 = © 500 (A)
Check
FO. Cost Variance = Expenditure Variance + Volume Variance
1,000 (A) = 500 (A) + © 500 (A)
Mustration 3.10
The following data is given:
Budget Actual
Production in units 12,500 11,000
Man hours 6,250 5,750
Overhead costs. :
Fixed 12,500 13,000
Variable 50,000 ASi000
Calculate overhead variances.
Solution
Basic calculations
zz,
Standard fixed overhead rate (per hour) = ee =t2
% 50,000
Standard variable overhead rate (per hour) = @>-5 =
6,250 hrs.
12,500
Standard hours for actual output = 11,000 units = 5,500 hrs.
Calculation of Variances
(a) Variable Overhead Variances
(i) Variable Overhead Cost Variance
St. hours for St. overhead) Actual overhead
VoCV = | actual output™ rate }~ cost
= (5,500 x & 8) - 45,000 = & 1,000 (A)
(ii) Overhead Expenditure or Budget Variance (OBV)
= Standard overhead - Actual overhead
= (Actual hrs. « St. rate) ~ Actual overhead cost
= (5,750 « % 8) ~ 45,000
= 46,000 - 45,000 = & 1,000 (F)is rr
y eensese comance Analysis 1"
Sa 3.27
Pains Efficiency Variance (of)
" ove!
(Se tous for seta
actual output ~ hours | * St. over
head rate
FATE 5.78055 Cia. 8 apg (a)
ae VOCV = OBV + ory
£1,000 (A) = € 1,000 (F) + & 2,099 ¢4)
“ved overhead Variances
em overhead Cost Variance
ci
St. hours for — St. overh
i overhead
POCY =: (actuel output sate’) = Actua ove ais
5, (6800 = € 2) 13,0005 © 2,000 (a)
qverhead Expenditure or Budget Variance (BV)
~ Budgeted overhead ~ Actual overhead
~ 12,500 ~ 13,000 = & 500 (a)
)overnead Volume Variance (0¥V)
(i
St.hrs. for Budgeted
actual production hrs, | x St. rate
= (5,500 - 6,250) x & 2 = © 1,500 (a)
one FOCV = OBV + ow
€ 2,000 (A) = % 500 (A) + & 1,500 (A)
pdivision of Overhead Volume Variance
yolume variance is further sub-divided into the following variances :
1, Efficiency Variance.
2, Capacity Variance.
3, Calender Variance.
Fixed Overhead Efficiency Variance. This is defined as “that portion of volume variance which
vies the increased or reduced output arising from efficiency above or below the standard which
‘sexpected”. This variance thus shows that the actual quantity produced is different from standard ‘
qantity because of higher or lower efficiency of workers engaged in production. Its formula is : \
| Bffciency Variance = Absorbed fixed overhead ~ Standard fixed overhead
| = (St. hrs. for actual output - Actual hours) x St rate |
|
Fixed Overhead Capacity Variance This is “that portion of the volume variance which is due
to working at higher or lower capacity usage than the standard’. Thus this variance arises when
plant capacity actually utilised is more or less than the capacity planned to be utilised due to
factors like idle time, under or over customer demand, strikes, power failure, ete, Its formula is :
Capacity Variance = (Standard fixed overhead - Budgeted overhead)
or = (Actual hrs. worked - Budgeted hours) x St. rateManage,
3.28 ii
Example:
Calculate fixed overhead efficiency variance and capacity variance from info,,,.
Mustration 3.10.
Solution
Efficiency Variance'= (cna! ouput ~ hours
= (5,500 = 5,750) x & 2. = © 500 (A)
Shs or, — Aaa) Sirol
denal_ Budgeted) sae
Capacity Variance = (‘hours ~ “hows
= (5,750 - 6,250) x % 2 = & 1,000 (A)
Check
Volume Variance = Efficiency Variance + Capacity Variance
& 1,500 (a) = © 500 (A) + ¥ 1,000 (A).
Calendar Variance. It may be defined as “that portion of the volume variance yy,
to the difference between the number of working days in the budget period and 1/0"
actual working days in the period to which the budget is applied”. Calendar varianc.
volume variance arising due to a particular cause. i.e, actual number of working 4,
different from those budgeted due to extra holiday being declared on the death oy"
leader or any other reason. Calendar variance arises only in exceptional cirmustanea, "2
normal holidays are taken into account while laying down the standard, ‘
When calendar variance is calculated, the calculation of capacity variance has to be ny,
so as to induct this additional variance into the analysis. Calendar variance is calculated by
following formula : y
‘St. rate per day
(Actual No.of _ St. No. of
Calendar Variance = (working days ~ working days|
[Revised budgeted _ Budgeted!
or = alas Mages I x. St. rate per hour
Generally, this variance is adverse because of extra holidays, but if there are extra wnt,
days (because of less holidays), then this variance will be favourable.
Mlustration 3.11
The following information is given :
St. fixed overhead rate (per hour) ws
Budgeted hours 12,500
St. No. of working days 25
‘Actual hours 11,500
‘Actual No. of working days 2
Calculate Calendar Variance.
Solution
St. No. of hrs. per day = 12,500 + 25 days = 500
Revised budgeted hours = St. hours per day x Actual No. of days
= 500 x 22 = 11,000Segre nee ANAS
sal
ost 3.29
dar Variance ~ (12,000 ~ 12,509) ,
cate ~ © 7,500 (a)
Method
ve
day= St. hrs. per d
| ad rate Per Per day » St. rate per
| wet SS00lhrs ini €'s =e 2,599 0
deal No.of s, 1,
sce = (worting dase ~ SiN 2F |) «Sh rue
oe king days) * pera
(22 - 25) « 2,500 & 7,509 (a)
capacity Variance
sete endar variance is to be calculated,
the method
ren sii ed. The new formula in that case ‘od of cali
culating capacity variance has
ified. TH is a follows
wee Actual No.of St No.of \ a5
(a capacity Variance = rere days ~ working days) * Strate per day
J
flotation given above, capacity variance willbe
capacity Variance = (11,500 ~ 11,000) x ¢ 5
jon 3-12
calculated as follows ¢
2,500 (F)
grit. has furnished you the following information for the month of August :
Budget Actual
output (units) 30,000 32,500
Hours 30,000 33,000
Fixed overhead % 45,000 50,000
Variable oe % 60,000 68,000
Working days 25 26
lalate overhead variances,
sotion
susie calculations :
‘ Budgeted hours _ 30,000.
andard hours per unit ~ Budgeted units ~ 30,000
4 hrs. for actual output = 32,500 units « 1 hr = 32,500
Budgeted overhead
Sandaid overhead rate per hour = “Budgeted hours
for fixed overheads = © 1.50 per hour
Jor variable overhead
= € 2.00 per hour
8 £0, rate per day = © 45,000 + 25 days = 1,800
Tecovered overhead = St. hrs. for actual output x St. rate
Fa fixed overhead = 32,500 hrs. x % 1.50 = & 48,750
for variable overhead = 32,500 his. x 2 = € 65,000
Sundard overhead = Actual hours St. rate
fr fixed overhead = 33,000 = 1.50 = © 49,5003.30 ta
For variable overhead
Revised budgeted hours
= 33,000 « 2
= % 66,000
Budgeted hours actual days
Budgeted days
30,000 , 96 31,200 hours.
Revised budgeted overhead (For fixe
= 31,200 « 1.50
Calculation of variances
Fixed Overhead Variances
(i) FO. Cost Variance
(ii) 0. Expenditure Variance
(iii) F.0. Volume Variance
(iv) FO. Efficiency Variance
(v) 0, Capacity Variance
(vi) Calendar Variance
Variable Overhead Variances
(V0. Cost Variance
(i) V.0. Expenditure Variance
(iii) V.0. Efficiency Variance
Check
(i) F.0. Cost Variance
1,250 (A)
(ii) B.0. Volume Variance
3,750 (F)
(iii) V.0. Cost Variance
3,000 (A)
25
id overhead)
= © 46,800
‘= Recovered Overhead ~ Actual Overhead
= 48,750 - $0,000 = €1,250 (A)
= Budgeted Overhead - Actual Overhead
= 45,000 ~ 50,000 = © 5,000 (A)
= Recovered Overhead - Budgeted Overhead
= 48,750 - 45,000 = © 3,750 (F)
Recovered Overhead - Standard Overhead
48,750 - 49,500 = © 750 (A)
Standard Overhead - Revised Budgeted Overhead
49,500 - 46,800 = © 2,700 (F)
(ea _ Budget
days ~ days
(26 - 25) x 1,800 = © 1,800 (F)
» St rate per day.
Recovered Overhead - Actual Overhead
= 65,000 - 68,000 =% 3,000 (A)
= St. Overhead - Actual Overhead
= 66,000 - 68,000 =® 2,000 (a)
= Recovered Overhead - St. overhead
= 65,000 - 66,000 =@ 1,000 (a)
Expenditure , Efficiency , Capacity , Calendar
= Variance * Variance * Variance * Variance
= 5,000 (A) + 750 (A) + 2,700 (F) + 1,800 (F)
Efficiency , Capacity , Calendar
= Variance * Variance * Variance
= 750 (A) + 2,700 (F) + 1,800 (F)
| Expenditure , Efficiency x
= Variance ‘Variance
= 2,000 (A) + 1,000 (A).; £&
la SALES VARIANCES
anies calculate only cost variances
Telating to mat
gone CO of course, invaluable, but to obtain 9 t© material, labour and overheads. These
ain full a¢
ee panies also calculate sales vatiances, White ca cvantage of standard costing ae
c budgeted profit due to favourable ov sant variances are concemed with coet and
adverse variances, the sales variances affec
ct on =
wre ered profit due to changes in sales mi,
it @ ive
6 pudde ices or sales quantities, nue ie., changes caused by either a variation
Il .
ia, are two distinct methods of calculating sates variances
ae qurmover (or value) method nia
@
by Masgin (oF profit) method
lowing chart shows the various main and sub-variances of sales,
=e
Margin Method )
(Volume Vai ance ) Price Variance)
fens) Gay Variance’ Mix Variance)
Fig. 3.3 Sales Variances
ne fol
Sales Variances
Volume Variance
Quantity Variance)
maNOVER METHOD OR SALES VALUE METHOD
tinder this method, the following variances are calculated:
1, Sales Value Variance. This is the difference between the budgeted value and the actual
sue of sales effected during a period. This variance is calculated as follows «
[sales Value Variance = (Actual sales) ~ (Budgeted sales) |
Sales value variance results due to one or more of the following reasons :
(@) Actual sales volume being more or less than the standard sales volume. This is expressed in
sales volume variance.
(0) Actual sales price received being higher or lower than the standard sales price, This is
expressed in sales price variance.
(9 A mix of products has been sold which is different from the standard mix. This is expressed
in sales mix variance.
2, Sales Volume Variance. Volume refers to the number of physical units. Sales volume
Taiance, therefore, represents that portion of the sales value variance which is due to the
‘ference between the actual volume and standard volume of sales. The formula is :
Sales Volume Variance = (Actual quantity - Budgeted quantity) x Standard price
= Standard sales ~ Budgeted sales3.32 Managemeny
Reasons. The usual reasons for this variance are : 1. Ineffective advertising and sale.
2. Unexpected competition. 3. Lack of proper supervision and control of salesmen,
3. Sales Price Variance, Sales price variance is that portion of the sales value ya,i,,
is due to the difference between standard price specified and the actual price <},\°*
formula for its calculation is: _ 3 ae
Sales Price Variance = (Actual price - Standard price) x Actual quantity
= Actual Sales - Standard Sales
If actual price is less than the standard price, possible reason may be unforeseen ¢.
The price may also have to be reduced if a larger number of units have to be soiq
Mustration 3.13
A company marketing a product supplies the following information :
Standard sales ‘Actual sales
ayy. Price Amt. ty. Price ne
Units z x Units z e
10,000 3 30,000 5,000 3 00
8,000 2.50 20,000
Calculate sales value variances.
Solution.
Sales Value Variance = Actual sales - Standard sales
= {(5,000 x 3) + (8,000 2.50)] - (10,000 = 3)
= 35,000 - 30,000 = €5,000 (F)
Sales Volume Variance = (AQ - BQ) = SP
= (13,000 - 10,000) x 3 = © 9,000 (F)
Sales Price Variance = (AP - SP) « AQ
= (3 - 3) « 5,000 = Nil
(2.50 - 3) x 8,000 = %4,000 (A)
Total = © 4,000 (A)
Check
Sales Value Variance = Volume Variance + Price Variance
5,000 (F) = 9,000 (F) + 4,000 (A)
4. Sales Mix Variance. When a company is selling more than one type of product, a bud.
will be prepared to show the budgeted sales of each product. If actual sales of different product:
is not in the same proportion as budgeted, a sales mix variance will arise. Sales mix variance is
“that portion of the sales volume variance which is due to the difference between the standard ani
the actual inter-relationship of the quantities of each product or product group of which sales ar
composed”.
It is calculated by the following formula :
Sales Mix Variance = (Actual quantity - Revised standard quantity) x Standard pre
or = Standard sales - Revised standard sales.i Variance Analysts 433
costing
Zant quantity is calculated as under
oe! Total of actual quanties of
\
products, Standard quantity
~ Total of standard quantities of all products " of one product
quantity pare ‘he variance is the difference between the budgeted sales and
les, Its formula is
andard 82
Sales Quantity _ (Revised standard _ Budgeted) _ Standard
Variance quantity
quantity) * price
= Revised standard sales - Budgeted sales,
dard quantity means actual sales quantity in budgeted ratio of products. Where
pent quantity is more than the revised standard quantity, this variance is adverse and
ee revised standard quantity is more than budgeted quantity, it is favourable.
BAO ye Variance = Price Variance + Volume Variance,
3 lume Variance ~ Mix Variance + Quantity Variance.
ies vlue Variance = Price Variance + Mix Variance + Quantity Variance
ention 3-14
ig data relates to two products X and Y.
following
Budget Actual
pet ay Price Value ary. Price Value
ie: z z e
: 1,000 5 5,000 1,200 6 1,200
1 1,500 10 15,000 1,400 9 12,600
eal 2,500 20,000 2,600 19,800
Gualited sales variances by Turnover Method.
‘siation
(dsaming that the products X and Y are homogeneous, quantity technique has been used)
Glalation of Standard Sales
oduct ‘Actual quantity Budgeted price ‘Standard sales
(A) (8) (A = B)
1,200 5 6,000
1,400 10 14,000
2,600 20,000
Gleilation of Revised Standard Quantity
Total AQ
lerised $0. Total SQ. * 50 of each ‘product2,600
x = Feq9 * 1,000 = 1,040 units:
500
00
Calculation of Variances
1, Sales Value Variance = Actual sales - Budgeted sales
= 1,500 = 1,560 units
= 19,800 ~ 20,000 = © 200 (a)
2 Salen Price Variance = (AP - SP) « AQ
X= (6-5) « 1,200 = © 1,200 (F)
Y= (9 = 10) « 1,400 = © 4,400 (A)
Total = @ 200 (A)
3, Sales Volume Variance = (AQ ~ 80) SP
X = (1,200 = 1,000) « 5 =F 1,000 (F)
Y = (1,400 ~ 1,500) x 10 = © 1,000 (A)
Total Nil
4. Sales Mix Variance = (AQ - RSQ) « SP
X = (1,200 - 1,040) = 5 =% 800 (F)
Y = (1,400 - 1,560) x 10 = © 1,600 (A)
=@ 800 (A)
5. Sales Quantity Variance = (RS0 - Bd) = SP
X = (1,060 - 1,000) « 5 =% 200 (F)
¥ = (1,560 - 1,500) « 10 =% 600 (F)
Total = & 800 (F)
Check
(i) Sales Value Variance = Price Variance + Volume Variance
200 (A) = 200 (A) + Nil
) Volume Variance = Mix Variance + Quantity Variance
Nil = 800 (A) + 800 (F)
SALES MARGIN METHOD
The sales margin method measures the effect on profit of deviations of actual from plans:
sales. Management is primarily interested in knowing these sales margin variances. Sales ma
variance analysis assumes all costs are at standard. Under this method, the following varia:
are calculated :
Total Sales Margin (Profit) Variance. This variance is the difference between actual pi
and budgeted profit. Its formula is:
Total sales ie Actual profit) — {Budgeted . Standard profi)
Margin Variance ~ \quantity per unit quantity per unit
= Actual profit - Budgeted profit.
Budgeted profit is calculated by multiplying budgeted quantity of sales with budgeted («
standard) profit per unit.e. SP inleuliance is divided in
7 to price variance
isles Wiblateetesin thovg ce and volume variance
KG wargin Price ee. It is the difference between actual profit and standard profit
8° [price Variance = Actual profit - Standard profit
| ofit is calculated by multiplying the
ard pr 5 actual quantity of sales with the budgeted (or
ae profit per unit. This variance is equal to the price variance calculated under sales walt
oo emus it can also lculated by the following formula
# [Price (Actual profit St. profit) Actual quant
| Variance Per unit ~ per unit) © sd”
ages rai Volume Variance. This is the difference between standard profit and budgeted
ee
Fs [Yolume Variance = Standard profit - Budgeted Profit |
ay also be calculated by the following method
R eae zane es
| Volume _ ( Actual _ ier) x Standard
| Variance ~ \quantity ~ quantity profit per unit
«Volume Variance is further sub-divided into mix variance and quantity variance.
in Mix Variance ~ This variance arises only wh ling more than
oe of product. Its formula is as follows : Se
Sales Margin (feta is Revised sandrd) ‘Standard profit
‘Mix Variance ~ \ quantity quantity per unit.
- Standard profit - Revised standard profit
sales Margin Quantity Variance. It is the difference between revised standard profit and
soizeted profit. Its formula is
Sales Margin ( Revised standard _ Budgeted) Standard profit
Quantity Variance ~ quantity quantity) “per unit
= Revised standard profit - Budgeted profit
Check
(i) Total Sales Margin Variance = Price Variance + Volume Variance
(i) Sales Margin Volume Variance = Mix Variance + Quantity Variance
Therefore
(ii) Total Sales Margin Variance= Price Variance + Mix Variance + Quantity Variance3.36
Mustration 3.15
The following data is supplied to y
fou for the month of January 2017
=u] Pudgated ats Uta sts
oy, Pagal ay i
ta 1.200 5 6,000 B10005 9 5.49 7
patie 32
ray 2,000 2 4.000 sa Se
a e 10,000 ay ¥
Total
Budgeted costs are: Ess - ® 4.00
Calculate sales margin variances.
Solution
per unit, Kay - € 1.50 per unit.
(Assuming that the products Ess and Kay are homogeneous, quantity technique is used heze)
Calculation of actual, standard and budgeted profits
Product | Actual profit | Actual | Actual | St. profit | Standard | Standard | 5,;,
per unit | quantity profit er unit profit quantity aa
1 2 3 4 5 6 ie
(23) (x5)
z z z
Ess 1.00 1,000 1,000 1.00 1,000 1,200
0.75 300 225 1.00 300
Kay 0.50 1,500 750 0.50 750 2,000
0.40 350 140 0.50 175
Total 3,150 2,115 2,205 3,200
Calculation of revised standard profit
Product Revised St. Qty. St. profit per unit Revised St. profit
(units) & ¢
1,200
Ess 3,200 » 3,150 = 1,181 1.00 1,181.00
2,000
Kay 3,200. x 3,150 = 1,969 0.50 984.50
Total 2,165.50
Calculation of Variances
1, Total Sales Margin Variance
2. Sales Margin Price Variance
= Actual profit - Budgeted Profit
= 2115 = 2,200 = ® 85 (A)
= Actual Profit - Standard Profit
= 2,115 - 2,225 = ® 110 (A)337
S 221212 400 aoe ead
ppp Mix Variance = St. Profit - Revised st. ron 2
= 2,225 ia
2,165.50
jn Quantity Variance= Revised st, p, ened
= Yofit ~ Budgeted Profit
7 2165.50 - 2,200» © 34,80 (ay
OH caies Margin Variance = Price Variance + Volume Variance
ot as (4) = © 110 (A) + & 25 (F)
e = Mix Variance + quantity y
lantity Variance
(ete e257)
= 59.50 (F) + 34.50 (4)
yy Technique and Value Technique of Computing Sales Mix Variance
is aan pray, be ee by using either quantity technique or value technique.
ntity Technique. Tus technique is used when various
I. i products being sold are
pogeneons: FOr example, Maruti Car Company is selling different types of cars. In this technique,
tion of sales mix variance is similar to material mix variance. This technique of calculating
on variance and sales quantity variance was used in Illustration 3.14.
> Valne Technique. This technique is used when products being sold are not homogeneous.
jeanple, 2 company is selling TVs, computers, arconditioners etc. In this technique, revised
sales value (instead of sales quantity) is calculated.
inder value technique, sales value variance, sales price variance and sales volume variance will
etle same a5 calculated under Quantity Technique. However, sales mix variance and sales
feaiy variance may be different,
istration 3.16
eer
sales variances by tumover method using value technique from the date given in
astration 3.14
solution
Jsstated above, sales value, price and volume variance will not be affected. Only mix and quantity
‘aiaces well be different. These are computed as follows:
usc calculations
(@) Standard sales = Actual quantities sold valued at standard prices.
(®) Revised standard sales = Standard sales value re-arranged in the budgeted ratio.
Products ‘Standard Sales (SS) Revised standard sales (RSS)
a Actual Standard Price Value Ratio z
ty. z z
1 1,200 5 6,000 25% 5.000 *
ea. 1,400 10 14,000 75% 15,000 *
aeee2*| 20,000 20,000
“Revised standard sales =
a
Total budgeted sales
‘Budgeted sles of individual products a54a) standard sales
Bear se338 il
5,000
5,009", 20,000 = © 5,000
X= 20,0
y = 15:00 , 20,000 = € 15,000
20,000
cateulation of Varlancet BY sie
et = 6,000 - 5,000 ~ 1,000 (F)
; ‘= 14,000 - 15,000 = 1,000 (A) |
" Total = NIL
= RSS - BS
tity Variance
we ee = 5,000 - 5,000 = NIL
x
Y = 15,000~ 15,000 = NIL |
Total = NIL
Check 5 2
Mix Variance + Quantity variance
Sales Volume Variance =
Nil = Nil + Nil
1d be noted that under Tumover Method, while using value technique, sales mis y,
fed on a re-arrangement of standard sales in terms of budgerey
represent the same figure. at
Note : It shoul
will always be zero because it is bas
fe. total standard sales and total revised standard sale:
DISPOSITION OF VARIANCES
When standard costs are not entered in the books of account and are used only as a stati
information, no adjustments are required at the end of the period for the variances, Hoi,
then standard costs are incorporated into the accounting system through journals and ledgers, is.
arises a question of adjustment and disposition of variances at the end of the accounting eto,
There is no uniformity of opinion as to the proper disposition of variances. Therefore, no
and fast rules can be laid down in this regard. The following methods of disposition of variance;
are based on practice followed in certain firms.
1, Transfer to Profit and Loss Account
Under this method, all variances are transferred to Profit and Loss Account at the end of the
accounting period. Thus, the stocks of work-in-progress and finished stock and cost of sales ae
maintained at standard costs. This method is based on the assumption that standard css
represent correct or real costs and all forms of variances represent conditions of inefficien
waste and below standard performance.
‘The method has the advantage of prompt and uniform valuation of inventories. Moreove:
presentation of variances as a separate group of items in the Profit and Loss Statement reflects
on profit or loss and attracts the attention of the management.
2, Allocation of Variances to Inventories and Costs of Sales
Under this method, variances are distributed over stocks of work-in-progress, finished
and cost of sales. This will result in showing inventories and costs of sales at actual costs. hs
‘method is based on the premise that standard costs are only tools of control and do not represt
the true or real costs. According to this method, thus actual costs should be reflected in t
financial statements.
stock, riance Analysis
and Variance * 3.39
oh
(Parr yois explained above ae quite easy to app
ene WaerTeeeSE Gig (Frartiee thd howe ely but variances are not disposed of
Pep ottee underlying reasons for their existence caeees ai spony ec
4, mriances which result from controllable factors
510 pol be transferred to Profit and Loss Account, On
en incorrect standards or uncontrollable causes should be allocated to inventories
uld be allocated to inventorie
Se sold on some equitable basis. For example, variance due to idle time (controllable)
of red to Profit and Loss Account and variance d
vot ieee Resanienniidite costa e due to change in material prices
‘a {uncontrol 0 inventory and cost of goods sold.
ve
,
and represent responsibilities of
n the other hand, those variances
po
CONTROL RATIOS
iances, certain control ratios are
jon to variances, cer commonly used by management for use in
goto “ations. These ratios are generally expressed in terms of percentages 1, te rato
a hye it indicates a favourable position and versa, if the ratio is less than 100%, it
ST Tarourable position. Three important control ratios are given below :
poe Ratio It is defined as “the standard hours equivalent to the work produced
giao percentage of actual hours spent in production’. Thus, this ratio shows whether
as H
# fraken in production is more or less than the time allowed by the standard. Its method
tion is
Standard hours for actual output
iciency ratio = |
Bene. ‘Actual hours worked 1
Ratio It is defined as “the standard hours equivalent to the work produced,
ts percentage of budgeted standard hours”. This ratio shows the extent to which the
‘allies have been utilised as compared with that contemplated in budgets. Its
= Standard hours for actual output
Activity ratio = “Budgetary hours fame
100
Ratio It shows the relationship between actual hours worked and the budgeted
formula is :
EB Actual hours worked
__| Sapacity ratio = “Budgeted hours
100
Ratio. Sometimes calender ratio is also calculated. This ratio indicates the extent of
days availed during the budget period. It is calculated by using the following
Calender Ratio = Actual working days in the budget period 99
Budgeted working days in the budget period6 Recerca eee en eee
3.40 2 eee
Managem,
Mlustration 3.16 ;
Two articles A and B are manufactured in a department of XYZ Co. Ltd. th...
show that 2 units of A and 8 units of B can be produced in one hour, The bude’ Pec
for a month is 400 units of A and 1,600 units of B. Actual production during \j°t®4
units of A and 2,000 units of B. Actual hours spent in production were 4g)
working days specified in the budget. However, actually worked days were 26 q,,7?*t0
Your are required to calculate the following ratios : Othe
(a) Activity Ratio (b) Capacity Ratio (c) Efficiency Ratio (d) Calender Ratio
Solution 7
Basic calculations :
Budgeted hours for the month :
A= 400 +2 = 200 hours
B= 1,600 +8 = 200 hours
Total 400 hours
Standard hours for actual productio
‘A 600+2 = 300 hours
B2,000+8 = 250 hours
Total 550 hours
a St. hours for actual production x 100
Oa ae Budgeted hours
550
= = «100=
00 137.50%
Actual hours worked
Budgeted hours
480
= 499 ~100= 120%
Sthours for actual production * 100
Actual hours
= 100
(©) Capacity Ratio
(©) Efficiency Ratio =
= 2 x 100- 114.59%
_—— Actual worked days x 100
COE Sine Reto racial noe
- 3% «100-106%
Check
‘Activity Ratio = Capacity Ratio Efficiency Ratio
137.50 % — = 120 % » 114.58 %
ee
SUMMARY OF FORMULAE
Material Variances
(i) Material Cost Variance = St. cost of actual output - Actual cost
= (St. aty. for actual output x St. price) - (Actual qty. x Actual price)and Variance Analysis
ste
variance = (St. price - Actual
Care variance P Actual price) » Actual qty.
yoo variance = (SQ for actual output
Ti eed ss es
a st yield Variance = (Actual yield - St. yield) x st. output price
‘ wel evised Usage Variance = (SO. for actual output ~ Revised Sd.) x St. price
(7 yaiances
pn + cost Variance = St. cost of actual output - Actual cost
ab" actual output » St. rate) - (Actual hours « Actual rate)
1 Mice variance = (St rate ~ Actual rte) « Actua hour
sp ee pene) Voronce = St. Iv fr actual output Aetual he) «St. rate
eine Vora = Idle hours « Standard rate
yim ie yronce = (Revie st. Rous~ Atl hous) » t,t
0 ur Yield Variance
wa jactal yield - St. yield for actual hours) « St. cost per unit of output
or Revised Efficiency Variance
ae (st. hours for actual output - Revised standard hours) « Standard rate
4 Variances
head (VO) Variances:
vant ve
Marable overhead Cost Variance = Absorbed overhead - Actual overhead
Standard overhead - Actual overhead
Absorbed overhead ~ Standard overhead
Wr yo Expenditure Variance
sffciency Variance
(7 overhead (F0) Variances:
+0 ost Variance
(i) #0 Expenditure Variance
Absorbed overhead - Actual overhead
judgeted overhead - Actual overhead '
fa) Fo Wolume Variance = Absorbed overhead - Budgeted overhead
jv) #0 Bfceney Variance = Absorbed overhead - Standard overhead
iy 79 Capcity Variance ‘= Standard overhead - Budgeted overhead
fi) F0 Revised Capacity Variance . overhead - Revised budgeted overhead
(Actual No. of _ St. No. of St. rate ¥
(vi) Calendra Variance s (oan days ~ working days) * per day Ay
or = (Revised budegeted hours - Budegeted hours) x St. rate per o
: hour.
aes Variances
sales Value Method
(i) Sales Value Variance = Actual sales - Budgeted sales
(i) Sales Volume Variance = Standard sales - Budgeted sales
= (AQ - BQ) « SP
(ii) Sates Price Variance = Actual sales - Standard sales
= (AP - SP) x Ad3.42 eee
= st. sales ~ Revised st. sales
(iv) Sales Mix Variance
= (AQ - Revised 50) * SP
= Revised St. Sales - Budgeted sales
(v) Sales Quantity Variance
= (Revised 5d - Budgeted aty.) = SP
Sales Margin Method
(i) Total Sales Margin Variance
(ii) Sales Nargin Price Variance
= Actual profit - Budgeted profit
«= Actual profit ~ Standard profit
= (Actual profit per unit-St. profit per unit) « 4g
= Standard profit ~ Budgeted profit
= (AQ - BQ) » St. profit per unit
«= Revised St. profit - Budgeted profit
= (Revised $Q - BQ) x St. profit per unit
= St. profit ~ Revised St. profit
= (AQ - Revised SQ) « St. profit per unit.
(iii) Sates Margin Volume Variance
(iv) Sales Margin Quantity Variance
(v) Sales Nargin Mix Variance
Control Ratios
St. hours for actual output
y nao ue Serene
OO i eae ‘tual hours worked ce
Standard hrs. for actual output
(f) Acinty Reto a ome agen
Actual hours worked
(iil) Capacity Ratio = “Budgeted hours * 1°
Actual working days
= Sauaea waking caylee
(iv) Calender Ratio
[ PROBLEMS ‘AND SOLUTIONS |
ppwoblosmi§s 25 (Micoer GUNN ERIOICES)
From the following particulars, compute:
(a) Material cost variance, (b) Material price variance, and (c) Material usage variance
Quantity of materials purchased 3,000 units
Value of materials purchased % 9,000
Standard quantity of materials required per ton of output 30 units
Standard price of material % 2.50 per unit
Opening stock of materials NL a
Closing stock of materials 500 unit:
Output during the period rues
(B.Com., Hons. Delh)ince Analysis:
and varia
7,
os 8
ion
a piel g material purchased
gs) frterals purchased =
Inet price per unit
standard price
standard quantity
‘Actual quantity
3.43
= 3,000 units
% 9,000
% 9,000
3,000 units ~ © 3 Per unit
2.50 per unit
80 tons = 30 units= 2,400 units
Opening stock + Purchase ~ Closing stock
= Nil + 3,000 = 500 = 2,500 units
variances :
00 eal Gost Variance = SC ~ AC
jo) = ($0 x SP) - (AQ « AP)
= (2,400 x 2.50) + (2,500 « 3.00)
MCV = © 1,500 (A)
eriat Price Variance = (SP - AP) « AQ
= (2.50 ~ 3.00) x 2,500
MPV = © 1,250 (A)
ial Usage Variance ~ (SQ - Ad) « SP
eer = (2,400 ~ 2,500) x 2.50
MUV = © 250 (A)
wy Nat
ect MCV = MPV + MUV
% 1,500 (A) = @ 1,250 (A) + % 250 (A)
% 1,500 (A) = % 1,500 (A)
3.2 (Material Variances)
4 manufacturing concern which has adopted standard costing furnishes the following
jornation =
Yaterial for 70 kg finished products
‘dation
Actual Quantity (AQ)
Sundard Price (SP)
100 kg
Price of material Z 1 per kg
staal =
output 2,10,000 kg
Material used 2,80,000 kg
Cost of materials. % 2,52,000
alate +
(@) Material usage variance, (b) Material price variance, (c) Material cost variance.
(BCom. Kerala)
100 kg
Sandard Quantity (SQ) for actual output= 2,10,000 kg = 794g = 3.00.00 kg
= 2,80,000 kg
= @ 1 per kg
Se4one
3.44 ba “
SeaTe = (€ 2,52,000 + 280,000 Ka) = Re 0.90 pe, ,, "
Actual Price (AP)
tanta = (80 AD) © SP
(a) Material Usage Variance - 3 tA ATE Agios € 7-0
i jance - (SP - AP) « A
(0) Material Price Variance = i‘ eS saa Bee's,
= ($0 = SP) - (AQ* AP)
: 6 109,000 x 1) ~ (2,80,000 x 0.90) = © 48,000 (ry
Mov © 48,000 (F)
Check
J
(c) Material Cost Variance
2
MPV & 28,000 (F) MUV ® 20,000 (r)
Problem 3.3 (Material Variances) ;
: ing 10 kg. , the standard material requirement is :~
For making 10 kg. of geme
Material Quantity (kg.) Rate Per kg. (¢ )
: 8 6.00
5 4 4.00
t 5 | consumption of mat
During April, 1,000 kg. of Gemco were produced. The actual Serials j
Materiel ‘uantty (ke) Rate per kg. (¢
4 750 7.00
> 500 i 5.00
Calculate (a) Material Cost Variance; (b) Material Price Variance; (c) Material usage y,
(CA
Solution
Basic calculations
Standard for 1000 kg. Actual for 1000 kg.
| Oty. Rate Amount Qty | Rate Amount
| Kg | 3s z cea < z
A 800 6 4,800 750 7 5,250
3 400 4 1,600 500 | 5 | 2500
Total {at coal [6400 | 1250 | 7,750
Calculation of Variances
(a) Material Cost Variance = SC for actual output ~ AC
MCV = 6,400 - 7,750 = % 1,350 (A)
(0) Material Price Variance = (SP - AP) x AQ
A = (6 - 7) « 750 =% 750 (A)
B = (4-5) x 500 %_ 500 (A)
MPV 1,250 (A)
(0) Material Usage Variance = (SQ - AQ) x SP
A = (800 - 750) x 6 =% 300 (F)
B = (400 - 500) x 4 400 (A)
Mov — = €100 (a)
a téi—cost?
LU? MCV @ 1,350 (A)
ing and Variance Analysis
pv & 1,250 (A)
n (waterial Variances)
¢ following
mc, (0) Price
information compute
and (c) Usage variances:
e
MUV @ 100 (A)
Standard Actual
Quantity Unit Total | Quantity :
a antl nit Total
| tea.) price (kg.) ef price
| ° ° z e ¢
‘ 1.00
Pex... 4.00 2 3.50 7.00
ny 2 2.00 00 | 4 2.00 2.00
preril 2 4.00 sco | 3 3.00 9.00
price Variance = (SP - AP) x AQ
ial A = (1 - 3.50) «2 5 (A)
as (2-2) =1 = Nil
aac = (6-3) «3 3(F)
er. 2 (a)
uuial Usage Variance = (SQ - AQ) = SP
wae A = (4-2) x1 == 20)
weeral B =(2-1)x2 2 (F)
Material € = (2-3) x4 4 (A)
MUV Ni
aerial Mix Variance = (Revised SQ - AQ) x SP
‘Material A =(3°- 2) «1 =? 1 (F)
Material B = (15 *- 1) x2 =f 1 (F)
Material € = (15° -3)*4 == 6)
MMV =< 4)
standard quantity is calculated as follows:
__ Standard quantity of material item
Total standard quantity
4
Matehal A == x 6 = 3 kg.
ee
Mae =F x 6 = 1.5 kg.
2
Material B= x 6 = 1.5 kg.
x Total actual quantity
2.00 16.00 6 3.00 18.00
(B.Com. Hons., Delhi)_ 9eMen,
3.46
Problem 3.5 (Material Variances)
The standard cost of a chemical mixture 4s as foll
40% material A at © 20 per kg
% material B at % 30 per kg
steer t is expected in production. The cost records +,
lows:
A standard loss of 10% of input
aoe neasomee eg materia A ata cost of € 28 per kg
110 kg material B at a cost of © 34 per kg
The quantity produced was 182 kg of good product.
Calculate all material variances. (B.Com. on
Solution
Basic calculations: —
ail Tandard for 1801 ky. output ‘Actual for 182 ty >
aty. Rate Amt. ary. Rate
[Sapa z zi | oka.
A | 2 20 1,600 90
z 120 30 3,600 110
Total 200 5,200 200
Less: Loss 20 = = 18
182,
St. cost of actual output = © 5,200 «755 = @ 5,257.78
Calculation of Variances
1. Material Cost Variance = (SC of actual output - AC)
= (5,257.78 - 5,360) = 102.22 (A)
2. Material Price Variance = (SP - AP) x AQ
Material A = (20 - 18) x 90 =& 180 (F)
Material 8 = (30 - 34) x 110 =%_440 (A)
MPV =®% 260 (A)
3. Material Usage Variance = (SQ for actual output - AQ) x SP
- 182
Material A = (220 Bay 20] x20 = % 182.22 (A)
182
Material B (120 ae 10) «30 = % 340.00 (F)
MUV ~ 2157.78 (F)
4. Material Mix Variance = (Revised $0 - AQ) x SP
Material 4 = (80 - 90) x 20 =% 200 (A)
Material B = (120 - 110) « 30 =%_ 300 (F)
MMV = % 100 (F)(OI ——
; ng and Variance Analysis ;
coin
uy
. ‘ Per unit of output
i = (182 - 180) « $200
180 * €57.78 (ry
ont MCV & 102.22 (A)
ev 200(8) MoV @ 157.78 (F)
os
pub 100, (F) MY? 7 78 (F)
3,6 (Material Variances)
standard material cost to produce one tonne of chemical X is :
poo ka. of material A@ 10 per keg,
yoo ka. of material B@Z 5 per kg,
500 ko. of material C@Z 6 per kg.
paing a period, 100 tonnes of chemical X were produced from the usage of :
45 tonnes of material A at a cost of € 9,000 per tonne
42 tonnes of material B at a cost of € 6,000 per tonne
3 tonnes of material C at a cost of € 7,000 per tonne
aelate material variances. (B.Com. Hons., Delhi)
fuse calculations : Conversion Rate is 1 tonne= 1,000 kg. it
erat Standard for 100 tonnes ‘Actual for 100 tonnes i
aty. Rate Ant. ty. Rate ‘Ant. ,
gs re @ Kg. @ @ ay
30,000 10 3,00,000 35,000 9 3,15,000 se
40,000 5 2,00,000 42,000 6 2,52,000 f
50,000 6 3,00,000 53,000 7 3,71,000 Ne
1,20,000 8,00,000 130,000, 9,38,000 x ;
20,000 - - 30,000 - a mh
Yoo,o00 | 8,00,000 | _1,00,000 = 9,38,000
of Variances
Cost Variance = SC of actual output - AC
MCV = 8,00,000 - 9,38,000 = %1,38,000 (A) meidoxd
tial Frice Variance = (SP - AP) » AQ
“ia A = (@ 10 - % 9) x 35,000 =@ 35,000 (F)
B = (85 - 76) x 42,000 = 42,000 (A)
¢ = (% 6 ~ &7) « 53,000 piensa cout)
‘MPV = © 60,000 (A) 8ae Mani §
agement 4c,
2. Material Usage (or Quantity) Variance = (50 ~ Ad) * SP
‘A = (30,000 ~ 35,000) « © 10 = ® 50,000 (A)
B = (40,000 - 42,000) « © § = © 10,000 (A)
© = (50,000 - 53,000) « © 6 = € 18,000 (A)
Sai78/000;(A)
4, Material Mix Variance = (Revised 50° = AQ) « SP
‘A. = (32,500 = 35,000) * 10 = © 25,000 (a)
1,30,000
4 = 42,000) . R
i 3 2, ) a5 © 6,667 (F)
1
c= (22 =$3,000) 5 6 = 7,000 (F)
MMV =~® 11,333 (A)
* Revised Standard Quantity is calculated as follows :
on) 1,30,000 30,000 = 32,500 ke
> Torat sa“? 4 =7/20,000 **” gai
1,30,000 1,30,000 162,500
Pa 50,000 = 262500 j,
B= 20,000 «4% = 4,20,000 ames”
5. Material Yield Variance (M17)
= (Actual yield - St. yield) x *St. cost per unit of output
(100 i= Lae) x 8,000 = & 66,667 (A).
*Working Notes:
__ Total standard cost
Total standard output
= 8,000 per tonne
1. Std. cost per unit of output
Actual output 100 Tonnes 1,300
2. Std. yield = toearsq * Total AQ =—755. 999° * 120,000 = “tonnes.
12
‘Check
MCV 1,38,000 (A)
‘MPV Z 60,000 (A) MUV & 78,000 (A)
[kh ee RR y
MMV % 11,333 (A) MYV & 66,667 (A)
Problem 3.7 (Material Variances)
80 kgs, of material A at a standard price of € 2 per kg and 40 kgs of material B at a standu!
price of % 5 per kg. were to be used to manufacture 100 kgs. of a chemical.
During a month, 70 kgs. of material A priced at % 2.10 per kg. and 50 kgs. of material B pre!
at 4,50 per kg. were actually used and the output of the chemical was 102 kgs.
Find out the material variances. (LOWA. Inte)i
riance Analysis
= 3d
Prt
oe St, cost of 100 kg. of output sux
eck Actual cost of 102 ky. of output
ty. urs
n ay, Rate ‘Amount
kg.
p
a MRA |
ra 210 | a7
50 4.50 225
120 kg. 372
cen ral output = soo), * 102 a = € 367.20
says = % 360+ 100kg =% 3.60
of Variances
fast Variance ~ St. cost of actual output - Actual cost
= 367.20 - 372 = © 4.80 (A)
price Variance ~ (St. price ~ Actual price) x Actual quantity
A = (2 - 2.10) « 70 =t 7 (4)
2 = (5 - 4.50) * 50 = 35)
mer = 18 (®)
= (Revised St. Qty. - Actual Qty.) x 5.P.
= (80 - 70) «2 == 20 (F)
B = (40 - 50) x5 =% 50 (A) >
MMV = %_ 30 (A) \
Yield Variance = (Actual yield - St. yield) « St. output price alts
nv = (102 - 100) x & 3.60 = & 7.20 (F) hs
given is Revised St. Qty because the total of actual quantities of materials consumed and is
d quantities is equal. he
)
MCV @ 4.80 (A) SH he
-— 1 x16
1818 (F) ‘MUV @ 22.80 (A) Te
ane +
MMV & 30 (A) MYV % 7.20 (A)
material cost for production of 100 kg. of Chemical D is made up of:
30 kg. @ © 4.00 per kg.
40 kg. @ & 5.00 per kg.
80 kg. @ & 6.00 per kg.3.50 bee
Ina batch, 500 kg. of chemical D.was PS
Chemical A
Chemical B
Chemical C
How do the yiel
100 per kg, of Chemical D 0
4, mix and the price fact
is wer the standard cost?
Solution
paste cateolations : Variances are calculated for 100 kg.
Managemen, ,
oduced from a mix of :
140 kg at a cost of z
220 kg at a cost of 2 14.
440 kg at a cost of Z 2 g,.
ors contribute to the variance in the act,
(B.com.,
of Chemical D as required
Naterial ‘Standard for 100 ko. Hetil for 100 bg,
aty. Rate Amt. 4 aty. Rate | an,
Xo. zg zg Kg. z aa:
R SS 4 120 28 4.20 .
2 40 5 200 44 4,80 ae
4 a 6 480 8B 6.50 ee y
Total 150 eon ad Bison
28¢ i
Actaal price per ka) Al =e 20 Fimo geet C= og Beis
‘Actual quantity per 100 kg Chemical D
1 220 440
Aa = 28 kas: Bae = 4h ig.3 CaS = 88 ky
Calculation of Variances
Material Cost Variance = SC - AC = 800 - 900.80 = © 100.80 (A)
Material Price Variance = (SP - AP) « AQ
A = (4 - 4.20) = 28 =% 5.60 (A)
B = (5 - 4.80) » 44 =2 8.80 (F)
C = (6 - 6.50) x 88 = 44.00 (A)
Material Usage Variance - (SQ - AQ) = SP
A = (30 - 28) x 4
B= (40 - 44) «5
C = (80 - 88) «6
Material Mix Variance = (RSQ - AQ) x SP
A = (32 - 28) 4
2
B= (42
(a)
=F 6.55.(A)
5-4) x5
1
Kasco eias = © 16.02 (A)
nar © 6.1 8)4 Variance Analysis
a 3.51
st. duantity) is computed as
below
160
150 * 80 ~ 854 kg
* 30 = 32 kg
au variance = (AY — SY) St output price
MV = (100 - 1062) x 9.
160 ,
st. yield =359 * 100 = 1062
© 53.33 (a)
og tpat rice = % 800 + 100 kg. = % g
go iaterial Variances)
janufactures PXE by i
rose itd. Mi tr Y mixing three raw materials, For each batch of 100 kg.
materials are used. In
of raw eras d and oct atch 60 batches are prepared to produce an output
of PXE. The wal particulars for June are as follows
eStandards marae
: Brea o fi rice perky, "Price per kg. | raw materials
purchased kg.
0. a) 60 | a 5000
a Be a0 20 8 2000
ee 2 20 6 1200
pall variances (B.Com., Hons. Delhi)
© Standard for 6,000 kg output | Actual for 5,600 kg output
1 T
L Kg. Rate Ant. Kg. ‘Rate Amt.
Bieas¢ . e z
3,750 20 75,000 4,500 a 94,500
2,250 10 22,500 1,500 8 12,000
1,500 by 7,500 1,500 6 9,000,
7,500 1,05,000 7,500 1,15,500
F %1,05,000
of actual output =~" x 5,600 Kg. = % 98,000
E 6,000 Ka. a
Variance = SC of actual output - AC ___
MCV = 98,000 - 1,15,500 “= %17,500 (A)
it,
Variance = (SP - AP) « AQ
a A = (20 - 21) x 4,500 = &% 4,500 (A)
a B = (10 - 8) x 1,500 ae 3008 @
C = (5 - 6) x 1,500 = © 1,500 (A)
E “MPV = & 3,000 (A)
may382 Adj ae
utput =
Variance = (50 for actual out
Material Usage Varian
3,750 , 5,600 - 4,800) + 20
4 = (io00
= (3800 ~ 4800) « 20 = © 20,000 (a
p= (2222 «5,400 1,800) « 10
= \6,000
= (2100 = 1500) « 10 Ba 00 (r)
(200 5,600 - 1,500] » 5
© = \6,000
= (1400 = 1500) « 5 —=<_500 (A)
MV = 844,500 (A)
= (Revised SQ - AQ) = SP
Materia Mix Variance + iiase 4,500) » 20 = © 15,000 (a)
B = (2,250 - 1,500) x 10 = © 7,500 (F)
C = (1,500 - 1,500) « 5 e Nil
MMV = & 7,500 (A)
Material Yield Variance = (Actual yield - St. yield) x St. output cost per unit
1
MYV = (5,600 - 6,000) «
7,000 (A)
Note: In the question, quantity of material purchased is given. It does not
consumed, Its thus assumed that quantity actually used is 7,500 units. In ease of materia 2° ‘
Sesumed that 300 units @ 6 were opening stock because purchased quantity is only 1 sc S
consumed quantity is 1,500 kg. a,
Problem 3.10 (Material Variances)
sive quantity o
The standard material input required for
1,000 kgs of a finished product are
Material
Given belo,
Quantity St. rate per ky
kg z
P 450 20
a 400 40
R 250 60
1,100
Standard loss 100
Standard output 1,000
Actual production in a period was 20,000 ka. of finished product for which the actual quant
of material used and the prices paid there, fe Bisnis.
of were as under:
Material Quantities Purchase price per ks.
i (Kg.) Ss
10,000 19
a 8,500 42
R 4,500
65Variance Analysis
Material Cost Variance (ii) Material Pic
itis Variance (v) Material Yield Variance, WY
gO reconciliation among the variances
3.53
ariance (iif) Material Usage Variance (iv)
(L.C.W.A. Inter)
for 20,000 ka output ai eas
000 ke outpu ‘Actual for 20,000 kg. output
Rat em
re Amt. ty, Rate Amt.
Re € ty) ? z
jo 180000 10,000 19 1,90,000
40° 3,20,000 8,500 42
60 __3,00,000 4,500 65
8,00,000 23,000
os __ 3,000
a 20,000
gation of Variances
aterial Cost Variance = SC - 4c
0 MCV = 8,00,000 ~ 8,39,500
yaterial Price Variance = (SP - 4?) « 4g
P = (20 - 19) x 10,000
@ = (40 ~ 42) x 8,500
R = (60 - 65) « 4,500
x pv =
Material Usage Variance = (SQ - AQ) x sP
P= (9,000 - 10,000) = 20
Q = (8,000 - 8,500) x 40
R = (5,000 - 4,500) « 60
terial Mix Variance = (RSQ* - AQ) SP
9,000
ae (23,000 amd
22,
= 4,500) x 40
5,000 A
ee 4,500) x
Be (23,000 rs 60
‘MMV =
Yield Variance = (AY - SY) x St. output price
mane eal) “
A (20,000 - 23, e000
= (23,000 « - 10,000) x =
Pp (23 rua 20 = % 11,818 (A)
= €39,500 (A)
= € 10,000 (F)
= %17,000 (A)
22,500 (A)
29,500 (A)
= % 20,000 (A)
= © 20,000 (A)
= © 30,000 (F)
‘MUV = %10,000 (A)
= % 5,455 (A)
=z 43.636 )
26,363 (F)
8,00,000,
20,000 ‘
x
n3.54
"4 4,60,000) , 40 = © 36,363 (A)
rv = (20,000 - S208 40 = @ 3 (A)
Reconciliation
(i) Nev = NPV 6 MOV
39,500 (A) = 29,500 (A) + 10,000 (A)
(ii) Nev = NPV + MAY + MV
39,500 (A) = 29,500 (A) + 26,363 (F) + 36,363 (A)
Problem 3.11 (Material Variances)
Philips Ltd. produces an article by blending two basic raw materials. The following
have been set up for raw material. a
Material Standard Mix St. Price per kg
A 40% w%
B 60% 3
The standard loss in processing is 15%. During September 2017 the company produces
ko. of finished output, The position of stock and purchases for the month of Septeyt’
is as under :
Material Stock on Stock on Purchases during
1-9-2017 30-9-2017 Sep. 2017
Kg. Kg. Kg. Cost &
A 35 5 800 3,400
B 40 50 1,200 3,000
Calculate all material variances assuming FIFO method of issue of materials. The opening ,
is to be valued at standard price. (B.Com. Hons. pan
Solution
Basic calculations :
3 100
(Calculation of standard quantity = 1,700 =~ 2,000 kg.
Material A = 2,000 « 40% = 800 kg.
Material B = 2,000 x 60% = 1,200 kg.
(ii) Actual consumption of materials
Material Op. stock + Purchases - Closing stock = Consumption
A 35 kg. + 800 kg. = 5 kg = 5 830 kg.
B 4okg. + 1,200kg. - 50 kg. = ‘1,190 kg.
(iii) Caleulation’ of actual price per kg. ‘
Material A = og = 4.25ind Variance Analysis
355
of standard and actual cost of actual output
Standard OS
1
Ameunt | Gy fate Amount
ba e ig. ces
es Nas =e
15 0 kas 5578.75
1200 eae RAR of 300, 120
250 2,875
= variances
ost Variance = Standard cost ~ Actual cost
MCV = 6,800 ~ 6,513.75
price Variance = (SP - AP) x AQ
A = (4 - 4) x 35] + [4 - 4.25) « 795] = & 198.75 (A)
B = [(3 - 3) x 40] + [(3 - 2.50) « 1,150] - & 575.00 (F)
= 2286.25 (F)
MPV = 376.25 (F)
ia) Usage Variance = (SQ - AQ) = SP
A = (800 - 830) x 4 =% 120 (A)
B = (1,200 - 1,190) x 3 =% 30)
Mov =® 90 (A)
Mix Variance = (RSQ - AQ) = SP
‘A = (808 - 830) x 4 = 88 (A)
B = (1,212 - 1,190) «3 =% 66)
MMV =R 22)
2,020
E A =3990 * 800 | = 808 kg.
2,020
3,000 * 1200 = 1,212 kg. 9
Yield Variance = (Actual yield --St. yield) « St. output price
6,800
1,700
MYV = (1,700 - 1,717) « = © 68 (A)
: 85kg :
St. yield = Top xg * 2.020 = 1.727 Kg. we
SN, tuodnd, baw. Sat
‘MCV = MPV + MMV + MYV
286.25 (F) = 376.25(F) + 22 (A) + 68 (A)
t8ri 10
‘as ; » $°o] eb, r9q. soxelgmsEE al
3.56 Managemen i
= es ks — he
Problem 3.12 (Material Variances) '
XYZ Ltd has established the following standard mix for producing 9 gallons of produc
z
5 gallons ~ Material x at © 7 per gallon %
3 gallons - Material X at © 5 per gallon 15
2 gallons ~ Material Z at © 2 per gallon
54
A standard loss of 10% of input is expected to\occur, Actual input was :
Material X - 53,000 gallons at & 7 per gallon
Material X - 28,000 gallons at © 5.30 per gallon
Material Z - 19,000 gallons at & 2.20 per gallon
Actual output for the period was 92,700 gallons.
Calculate: (i) Material Mix Variance, and (ji) Material Yield Variance, (B.Com, Hon,
Solution
Basic calculations
Standard Cost Actual Cost
ary. Rate Amt. ty. Rate
Gallons e @ Gallons e
x 50,000 7 3,50,000 53,000 7.00
Yr 30,000 5 1,50,000 28,000 5.30
z 20,000 2 40,000 19,000 2.20
100,000, 5,40,000 41,00,000
Less: Loss 410,000 7,300
Output 90,000 92,700
Material Mix Variance = (Revised SQ - AQ) x SP
X = (50,000 - 53,000) «7 = & 21,000 (A)
¥ = (30,000 - 28,000) x5 = % 10,000 (F)
Z = (20,000 - 19,000) x2 = % _2,000(F)
MMV = % 9,000 (A)
Material Yield Variance = (AY - SY) « St. output price
&5,40,000
= (92,700 - 90,000) « —**40,000_
if ) * $0,000 gallons
MYV = 2,700 x 6 = 16,200 (F).
Problem 3.13 (Material and Labour Variances)
From the particulars given below, compute: Material Price Variance, Material Usage Varian.
Labour Rate Variance, Idle Time Variance and Labour Efficiency Variance with full working deta
One tonne of materials input yields a standard output of 1,00,000 units. The standard prit
of material is € 20 per kg. Number of employees engaged is 200. The standard wage rate P*
employee per day is % 6. The standard daily output per employee is 100 units. The a‘¥!