We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Republic of the Philippines
National Police Commission
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS, PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
DIRECTORATE FOR INVESTIGATION AND DETECTIVE MANAGEMENT
‘Camp Bgen Rafael T Crame, Quezon City
DIDM Investigatiye Directive
Number 2018-__“/
REITERATION ON THE GUIDELINES IN THE MONITORING
AND UPDATING OF STATUS OF CASES
1. References:
»
Oversight Committee on Illegal Drugs Meeting conducted on January
11, 2018;
Memorandum to RDs, PROs 1-13, COR, ARMM & NCRPO re
Encoding and Updating of Incidents in the CIRAS dated October 5,
2016;
Memorandum to RDs, PROs 1-13, COR, ARMM & NCRPO re CIRAS
Compliance Efficiency dated September 7, 2016;
DIDM Investigative Directive Number 2015-02 “Quality Assurance
Support to Vietms and Complainants (QASVC)" dated October 2,
LOI 02/09 Unit Crime Periodic Report (UCPER) dated April 22, 2009;
and
| NAPOLCOM MC 94-017 re Adopting a Uniform Criteria in
Determining When a Crime Considered Solved, dated June 2, 1994.
o
°
Fr
@
2. Rationale:
It has been observed during the conduct of InbestigaTour 2017 that
most crime incidents were not encoded in the Crime Information Reporting and
Analysis System (CIRAS) by the Investigator-on-Case (IOC). The burden of
encoding was instead relinquished to the Unit's Crime Registrar that resulted to
poor encoding of facts of the case, were left unfilled. Moreover, the status of cases
from the start of investigation up to the filing of criminal complaint to the prosecutor
and the court were not reported nor updated. Hence, the reported Crime Solution
(CS) is understated/inaccurate.
3. Purpose:
This Directive reiterates previous Investigative Guidelines to emphasize
consistency in the monitoring and updating of status of solved cases in the CIRAS.
It provides mechanism on IOC to closely monitor the status of each criminal case
assigned to them. Moreover, OC shall ensure that the relatives of every
complainantvictim be notified periodically on the status of their complaint filed in
court in compliance in the DIDM Investigative Directive No. 2015-02 “QualityAssurance Support to Victims and Complainants (QASVC).
4. Guidelines
To ensure consistency in the monitoring and updating of status of
solved cases in the CIRAS, the following guidelines must be strictly followed and
implemented:
a. Crime incidents shall be encoded in the CIRAS by the IOC
immediately within 24 hours from the time of the occurrence of the
incident using their personal account provided by Information
Technology Division (ITD), DIDM;
Updating of all cases should be done daily for submission of reports
on the status of cases of solved cases in preparation for CPNP’s
weekly press briefing;
c. If the case was inquested, the case number, name of prosecutor,
amount of bail, and other disposition of the complaint should be
encoded; If the status is Released for Further Investigation (RFI),
indicate the reason like: Non-Appearance of Apprehending Officer
(NAAO) during inquest, No Attached Laboratory Exam (NALE), and
other details that caused RFI;
Include in the updating of the case if the relatives of the
complainant/victim were notified on the status of complaint filed in
court in compliance to the DIDM ID No. 2015-02 QASVC;
Include in the encoding the updates of court proceedings like
Arraignment, On-Going Trial, Warrant of Arrest Issued due to Non-
Appearance of the Suspect/Witnesses, Final Resolution,
Conviction, etc;
f. Updates by the IOC shall include Dismissal of the Case due to Non-
Appearance in Court of the complainant, witnesses, apprehending
officers, and other contributing factors that cause the dismissal of
cases; and
g. Conviction of the Suspects due to Plea Bargaining shall be
encoded indicating the detention of jail/prison term penalty and/or
fined imposed by the court.
s
a
9
5. Responsibilities:
a. Deputy Director, DIDM shall be responsible in supervising the
implementation of this Directive;
b. Executive Officer, DIDM shall assist the DDIDM in supervising the
implementation of this Directive in coordination with concerned
Directorates, NOSUs, PROs and other Offices/Units to ensure that
updating of reports are executed.
c. Chief, Crime Research and Analysis Center (CRAC), DIDM shall be
the over-all OPR of this Directive;
d. Chief, Case Monitoring Division (CMD), DIDM shall monitor the
updating and timely reporting of all cases;
e. Chief, Pre-Charge Evaluation and Investigation Division (PCEID),
DIDM shall ensure the filing of appropriate administrative charges
pursuant to NAPOLCOM MC 2016-002 against personnel who failed
ems Hesse: eg egret 209 MemeingndUping of a CASS a 2 28. 2to report or refused to take appropriate action on the prescribed
guidelines of this Directive;
Regional Directors, Police Regional Offices (RDs, PROs) shall ensure
compliance of this Directive and monitor compliance for the timely
submission of reports to DIDM;
9. District/Provincial/City Directors shall ensure strict implementation of
this Directive.
h. Chief of Police/Station Commanders shall strictly supervise the
concerned IOC in the implementation of this Directives.
6. Adminisrative Sanction:
The filing of administrative charges pursuant to NAPOLCOM MC.
2016-002 shall proceed against personnel who will refuse or take actions on the
prescribed guidelines of this Directive.
7. For guidance and strict compliance.
ELMO FRAI (0 SARONA
Police Chief Sperintendent<,
Distribution:
‘Command Group
D-Staff
NSUs
Mccann Des MDM Ime Din 208 Marie epg tn CASS 2 0