0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views4 pages

Healey 02 0506

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views4 pages

Healey 02 0506

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

IEEE Draft P802.3ap/Draft 2.

4a
Draft Amendment to IEEE Std. 802.3-2005 May 31, 2006

1 RL ( f ) ≥ RL min ( f ) = 15 (69B–12)
2
3 for 50 MHz ≤ f < 275 MHz and
4
5
RL ( f ) ≥ RL min ( f ) = 15 – 9.64log 10  -----------------------
f
6 (69B–13)
 275 MHz
7
8
9 for 275 MHz ≤ f < 3000 MHz and
10
11 RL ( f ) ≥ RL min ( f ) = 5 (69B–14)
12
13 for 3000 MHz ≤ f ≤ 10321.5 MHz.
14
15 The recommendation applies from 50 MHz to the signaling speed of the PHY type of interest. The return
16 loss limit is illustrated in Figure 69B–6..
17 20
18
18 HIGH CONFIDENCE
19 REGION
20
16
21
22 14
23 RLmin
Return loss (dB)

24 12
25
26 10
27
28 8
29
6 1000BASE-KX
30
31 4 10GBASE-KX4
32
33 2 10GBASE-KR
34
35 0
50 100 1000 10000
36 Frequency (MHz)
37
38
Figure 69B–10—Return loss limits
39
40
41
69B.4.6 Crosstalk
42
43
In order to limit the crosstalk at TP4, the differential crosstalk due to near-end and far-end aggressors is
44
specified to meet the BER objective defined in 69.1.2. The following equations and informative model
45
assume that aggressors and victim are driven by PHYs of the same typetype and transmit characteristics.
46
47
48 69B.4.6.1 Power sum differential near-end crosstalk (PSNEXT)
49
50 The differential near-end crosstalk at TP4 is calculated as the power sum of the individual NEXT aggressors
51 (PSNEXT). PSNEXT is computed as shown in Equation (69B–15), where NEXTn is the crosstalk loss, in dB,
52 of aggressor n. Note that for the case of a single aggressor, PSNEXT will be the crosstalk loss for that single
53 aggressor.
54

Copyright © 2006 IEEE. All rights reserved.


This is an unapproved IEEE Standards Draft, subject to change 193
IEEE Draft P802.3ap/Draft 2.4a
Draft Amendment to IEEE Std. 802.3-2005 May 31, 2006

1 – NEXT n ( f ) ⁄ 10
PSNEXT ( f ) = – 10 log  ∑ 10 (69B–15)
2  
n
3
4
5 69B.4.6.2 Power sum differential far-end crosstalk (PSFEXT)
6
7 The differential far-end crosstalk at TP4 is calculated as the power sum of the individual FEXT aggressors
8 (PSFEXT). PSFEXT is computed as shown in Equation (69B–16), where FEXTn is the crosstalk loss, in dB,
9 of aggressor n. Note that for the case of a single aggressor, PSFEXT will be the crosstalk loss for that single
10 aggressor.
11
12 – FEXT n ( f ) ⁄ 10
PSFEXT ( f ) = – 10 log  ∑ 10 (69B–16)
13  
n
14
15
16 69B.4.6.3 Power sum differential crosstalk
17
18 The differential crosstalk at TP4 is calculated as the power sum of the individual NEXT and FEXT aggres-
19 sors (PSXT). PSXT may be computed as shown in Equation (69B–17).
20
21 – P SNEXT ( f ) ⁄ 10 – P SFEXT ( f ) ⁄ 10
PSXT ( f ) = – 10 log ( 10 + 10 ) (69B–17)
22
23
24 69B.4.6.4 Insertion loss to crosstalk ratio (ICR)
25
26 Insertion loss to crosstalk ratio (ICR) is the ratio of the insertion loss, measured from TP1 to TP4, to the total
27 crosstalk measured at TP4. ICR may be computed from IL and PSXT as shown in Equation (69B–18).
28
29 ICR ( f ) = – I L ( f ) + PSXT ( f ) (69B–18)
30
31 Assuming ICR is computed at N uniformly-spaced frequencies fn spanning the frequency range fa to fb, ICR-
32 fit may be computed using Equations (69B–19) through (69B–23). The values of fa and fb are dependent on
33 port type and are provided in Table 69B–1.
34
35 1
36 x avg = ---- ∑ log ( f n ) (69B–19)
N
n
37
38
1
39 ICR avg = ---- ∑ ICR ( f n ) (69B–20)
N
40 n
41
42
43
∑ ( log ( fn ) – xavg ) ( ICR ( fn ) – ICRavg )
n
44 m ICR = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- (69B–21)
2
∑ ( log ( f n ) – x avg )
45
n
46
47 b ICR = ICR avg – m ICR x avg (69B–22)
48
49
ICR fit ( f ) = m ICR log ( f ) + b ICR (69B–23)
50
51
The ICRfit computed in Equation (69B–23) does not consider channel self-interference and system configu-
52
ration extremes. Two ICR penalties are introduced to account for these conditions: an ILD penalty, PILD, and
53
a system configuration penalty, PSYS.
54

Copyright © 2006 IEEE. All rights reserved.


This is an unapproved IEEE Standards Draft, subject to change 194
IEEE Draft P802.3ap/Draft 2.4a
Draft Amendment to IEEE Std. 802.3-2005 May 31, 2006

1 Given that the insertion loss deviation, ILD, is computed an n evenly-spaced frequencies, fn, spanning fa to
2 fb, PILD is defined in Equation (69B–24).
3
4
P ILD = 5.0  ---- ∑ ILD ( f n ) – 0.1 ( A max ( f b ) – A ( fb ) ) – 0.8
1 2
(69B–24)
5 N 
n
6
7
The system configuration penalty is defined in Equation (69B–25) and Table 69B–2. This penalty accounts
8
for the potential differences in characteristcs (e.g. amplitude, rise and fall times), between the victim and
9
aggressor transmitters. The penalties listed in Table 69B–2 are maximum values based on the worst-case
10
mismatch between the victim and aggressor transmitters. The penalty values may be refined based on
11
knowledge of the specific system implemenation.
12
13
14 P SYS = P A + P RE (69B–25)
15
16
17 Table 69B–2—System configuration penalty
18
19 Penalty Description Value Units
20
21 PA
Difference in amplitude between victim and aggressor
3.5 dB
22 transmitters
23 Difference in rise and fall times and equalization setting
24 PRE 2.0 dB
between victim and aggressor transmitters
25
26 PSYS Total system configuration penalty 5.5 dB
27
28
29 It is recommended that ICRfit ICRfit, offset by PILD and PSYS, be greater than than or equal to ICRmin as
30 defined in Equation (69B–26).
31
ICR fit ( f ) ≥ ICR min ( f ) = 14.8 – 18.7 log  ----------------
32 f
33  5 GHz
34
ICR fit – P ILD – P SYS ≥ ICR min ( f ) = 14.8 – 18.7 log  ----------------
f
35 (69B–26)
 5 GHz
36
37
for fa ≤ f ≤ fb.
38
39
The insertion loss to crosstalk ratio limit for each port type is illustrated in Figure 69B–11.
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

Copyright © 2006 IEEE. All rights reserved.


This is an unapproved IEEE Standards Draft, subject to change 195
IEEE Draft P802.3ap/Draft 2.4a
Draft Amendment to IEEE Std. 802.3-2005 May 31, 2006

1
2 50
3 ICRmin+P SYS
4 45
5 HIGH CONFIDENCE
6 40

Insertion loss to crosstalk ratio (dB)


REGION
7
35
8
9 30 ICRmin
10
11 25
12
13 20 1000BASE-KX
14
15 10GBASE-KX4
15
16 10 10GBASE-KR
17
18 5
19
20 0
100 1000 10000
21 Frequency (MHz)
22
23
24 Figure 69B–11—Insertion loss to crosstalk ratio limit
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

Copyright © 2006 IEEE. All rights reserved.


This is an unapproved IEEE Standards Draft, subject to change 196

You might also like