0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views5 pages

Form 5M - QC Checklist For Control System Architecture Drawings Rev 1 (3!5!2018)

Guidelines
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views5 pages

Form 5M - QC Checklist For Control System Architecture Drawings Rev 1 (3!5!2018)

Guidelines
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Critical Documents

Form 5M – QC Checklist
for Control System Architecture Drawings
Effective Date: 3/5/2018, Rev: 1.0

Facility Name: Date Assigned:


Drawing Number:
 Complete this Checklist while performing the Drawing Quality Control (QC) tasks to help ensure
adequate review.
 This document is not an exhaustive list. It gives a starting point to complete the tasks involved in
QC of the As-Found Document.
 Refer to applicable Guidelines and Job Aids available through the Critical Documents SharePoint.
 Contact PG&E Engineering Design for questions.
 Upload this file in the appropriate station folder as CD_Document_QC Checklist.pdf, replacing
‘Document’ with the document type being Quality Controlled.
 The Drawing QC Person shall review and sign the form prior to the Review Meeting.
Status: Did you change the Status in the CD SharePoint to Drawing QC In-Progress? ☐ Yes / ☐ No

Title Block:
Is the document titled “Control -
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
Diagram”? (first portion of the title)
Is the second line of the document
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
titled “Control System Architecture”?
Is the Facility Name provided? (third
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
portion of the title)
Are the fields for Drawing Number,
Revision Number, and Sheet Number ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
populated?
Is the drawing revision history shown,
with Revision Numbers, dates, and
boxes for “Drawn by” (DWN),
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
“Checked by” (CHKD) “Supervised
by” (SUPV), and “Approved by”
(APVD BY)?
Is the latest revision titled “ISSUED
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
FOR USE - AS FOUND”?
Is the Project Number inserted in the
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
GM/Spec box correct for the facility?
Is the box “Supersedes” filled out with ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
the superseded Drawing Number? No / ☐ N/A
Is there a place for a PE stamp?. ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:

Is the PE stamp present? ☐ Yes / ☐ No If yes:

Is a ProjectWise smart boarder used? ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:

Comments or Requested Changes:

Page 1 of 5
Critical Documents
Form 5M – QC Checklist
for Control System Architecture Drawings
Effective Date: 3/5/2018, Rev: 1.0

Symbols and Devices:


Are the correct line styles used for
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
connections?
Are printers and computers shown as ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
boxes instead of graphics ? No / ☐ N/A
Is there a legend on the right side of
the drawing showing the line style and ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
any acronyms used?
Comments or Requested Changes:

General Style and Notes:


Are serial connections labels with the ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
type? No / ☐ N/A
☐ Yes / ☐
Are all Ethernet switches labeled? If no:
No / ☐ N/A
Are all Ethernet ports shown and ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
labeled? No / ☐ N/A
Is all text aligned to vertical? ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:

Are electrical connections shown? ☐ Yes / ☐ No If yes:

Are all components properly labeled? ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:


Where controls components are
☐ Yes / ☐ No
located in different locations, is the If no:
/ ☐ N/A
location identified?
Is a List of Notes provided, if the CSA
has Notes, and is each Note
numbered sequentially? ☐ Yes / ☐ No
If no:
Example of notes: / ☐ N/A
 Prefix “IC695” for all PLC and
NIU Part numbers.
Is the List of Notes placed on the ☐ Yes / ☐ No
If no:
right-hand side of the drawing? / ☐ N/A
Are the Note Numbers inserted next
☐ Yes / ☐ No
to the relevant sections of the drawing If no:
/ ☐ N/A
for reference?
Comments or Requested Changes:

Page 2 of 5
Critical Documents
Form 5M – QC Checklist
for Control System Architecture Drawings
Effective Date: 3/5/2018, Rev: 1.0

Genius Block Information:


☐ Yes / ☐
Is the SBA shown for each block? If no:
No / ☐ N/A
Is the block tag shown for each ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
block? No / ☐ N/A
Is the I/O address listed for each ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
block? No / ☐ N/A
Is a reference drawing listed for each ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
block? No / ☐ N/A
Is the location of the genius block ☐ Yes / ☐ No
If no:
shown? / ☐ N/A
Comments or Requested Changes:

Rack-Mounted I/O Information:


Is each rack labeled with the rack ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
type? No / ☐ N/A
Is each slot numbered on the top of ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
the rack with the slot number? No / ☐ N/A
Is each slot labeled with the short ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
abbreviation and part number? No / ☐ N/A
For inputs and outputs, is the address ☐ Yes / ☐
If no:
included in parentheses in the slot ? No / ☐ N/A
For inputs and outputs, is the
☐ Yes / ☐
applicable Connection Diagram If no:
listed? No / ☐ N/A
☐ Yes / ☐ No
Are OITs/HMIs shown and labeled? If no:
/ ☐ N/A
Comments or Requested Changes:

RTU Cabinet or other Non-Rack-Mounted I/O Information:


☐ Yes / ☐
Are all I/O modules properly labeled? If no:
No / ☐ N/A

Page 3 of 5
Critical Documents
Form 5M – QC Checklist
for Control System Architecture Drawings
Effective Date: 3/5/2018, Rev: 1.0

☐ Yes / ☐
Are all model/type numbers listed? If no:
No / ☐ N/A
☐ Yes / ☐ No
Is the RTU address listed? If no:
/ ☐ N/A
Comments or Requested Changes:

References:
Is a List of References provided, and
is each Reference Number and ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
Reference Title Name provided?
Is the List of References organized
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
numerically by Reference Number?
Is the List of References placed on
the right side of the drawing, above ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
the Title Block?
Are references made to the
☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
appropriate Connection Diagrams?
Comments or Requested Changes:

Closing:
Have all redline changes denoted in ☐ Yes / ☐ No
If no:
green ink been removed? /☐ N/A
Have all redline changes denoted in ☐ Yes / ☐ No
If no:
red ink been changed? /☐ N/A
Have all redline comments denoted in ☐ Yes / ☐ No
If no:
blue ink been addressed? /☐ N/A
Has the status in the CD SharePoint
been changed to Drawing QC ☐ Yes / ☐ No If no:
Complete?
Comments or Requested Changes:

Signature

Page 4 of 5
Critical Documents
Form 5M – QC Checklist
for Control System Architecture Drawings
Effective Date: 3/5/2018, Rev: 1.0

 Add electronic signature, to confirm all critical documents have been completely verified.
 Please do not print unnecessary copies.

Drawing QC Person:

Name: Date Completed:

Page 5 of 5

You might also like