Ethiopia
Ethiopia
E T HI OPI A
Cover photographs: ©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
ETHIOPIA CLIMATE-SMART
AGRICULTURE SCOPING STUDY
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression
of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning
the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers,
whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by the
FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views
or policies of FAO.
© FAO, 2016
FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where
otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching
purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO
as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not
implied in any way.
All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made
via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased
through [email protected].
CONTENTS
PREFACE v
Acknowledgements vi
Acronyms vii
Executive Summary ix
1
Background 1
1.1 Land, Agriculture and Food Security 1
1.2 Objective of the Study 2
1.3 Study Methodology 2
2
Farming Systems and CSA Technologies and Practices 3
2.1 Existing Farming Systems 3
2.2 Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices 5
2.2.1 CSA Practices and Technologies Implemented and Adopted 5
2.2.2 Traditional CSA Practices 17
2.3 CSA and Biophysical Conditions 18
3
CSA Programmes and Projects
20
4
Stakeholders in CSA Activities 25
4.1 Government Ministries, Departments and Units 25
4.2 NGOs 27
4.3 International Development Agencies 29
4.4 Research Organizations 29
5
Policies, Strategies and Institutions Relevant to CSA 31
5.1 Policies and Strategies 31
5.2 Institutions 34
5.3 Effectiveness of CSA Policies, Strategies and Institutions 35
6
Gender and CSA 36
7
Conclusions and Recommendations 37
7.1 Conclusions 37
7.2 Key Challenges to Implementing CSA in Ethiopia 38
7.3 Untapped Opportunities 39
7.4 Recommendations 40
References 41
Boxes
Box 1: Case Study 1 - Debremawi Learning Watershed Site 6
Box 2: Socio-economic and environmental impacts of conservation agriculture 9
Box 3: Conservation agriculture principles, practices and technologies in Ethiopia 10
Box 4: Challenges to conservation agriculture promotion in Ethiopia 12
Box 5: Case Study 2 - Adoption of conservation agriculture in Sibusire woreda
of Oromia Regional State 14
Box 6: Conservation agriculture on vertisols in Ethiopia 19
Box 7: Use of the chisel plough for conservation agriculture in Ethiopia 23
Box 8: Conservation agriculture research in Ethiopia 29
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA), as defined and presented by FAO at the Hague Conference on Agriculture, Food
Security and Climate Change in 2010, contributes to the achievement of sustainable development goals. It integrates
the three dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social and environmental) by jointly addressing food
security and climate challenges. CSA is composed of three main pillars – sustainably increasing agricultural productivity
and incomes; adapting and building resilience to climate change; and reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions, where possible.
This report on CSA in Ethiopia was initiated by the FAO Sub-regional Office for Eastern Africa to identify and
document existing CSA practices in the country that enable stakeholders to understand the opportunities and
constraints of adopting particular CSA technologies or practices. There is opportunity to use this information to
inform agricultural related policies, programmes and projects in the country with the aim of sustainably increasing
agricultural production and productivity; building resilience to climate-related hazards; and contributing to climate
change mitigation.
The report was prepared by FAO consultant Melaku Jirata and edited by Edward Kilawe and Sebastian Grey from
the FAO Sub-regional Office for Eastern Africa (FAOSFE) and Amare Mengiste of FAO Ethiopia.
The authors express their gratitude to Mitzi du Plessis for managing the editing, design and layout of the publication
in collaboration with graphic designer Elke Momberg.
©FAO/Giulio Napolitano
Agriculture is the mainstay of the Ethiopian population Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and numerous NGOs.
and a key sector of the country’s economy. The Ethiopian government has put in place a number
of policies, strategies and laws that are designed to
However, on account of climatic, social and institutional support climate change mitigation and adaptation
factors contributing to low production and productivity, and sustainable development. Although the current
agriculture is unable to feed the population. The current policies, strategies and laws related to climate change
study on climate-smart agriculture (CSA) was initiated to and sustainable agriculture in Ethiopia are adequate,
identify and document existing CSA practices in Ethiopia they lack detailed guidelines, manuals and action plans
that enable stakeholders to understand the opportunities and are not sufficiently mainstreamed into existing
and constraints of adopting particular CSA technologies programmes and projects.
or practices.
There is a lack of adequate research findings on CSA
The study methodology includes a desk review of relevant practices in Ethiopia for the various agro-ecology, soil
information, in-depth key informant interviews, collection type, rainfall pattern, farming system, temperature and
of primary qualitative and quantitative data, as well as moisture ranges. Hence, research projects on CSA
field visits to districts undertaking agricultural activities should be supported. Data on CSA and on conservation
pertinent to CSA. agriculture in particular, are insufficient at all levels.
The study indicated that, as part of the improvement Ethiopia lacks knowledge and skills pertaining to
of livelihoods and food security, numerous traditional CSA and conservation agriculture in particular. For
as well as innovative climate adaptation and mitigation purposes of knowledge dissemination, a comprehensive
agricultural development activities are conducted. capacity development approach that builds on the sound
Conservation agriculture is one of the key CSA activities assessment of the needs of all stakeholders is required.
conducted in Ethiopia from 1998 onwards. Since then, Within diversified extension service delivery there is a
numerous trials and development work on conservation need to build the capacity of all NGOs and conservation
agriculture have been undertaken. agriculture implementing organizations with major
emphasis on the extension directorate of the Ministry
Conservation agriculture is promoted mainly by NGOs of Agriculture. It is through the extension system that
and the private sector with support from agricultural the technologies reach the wider community.
offices at all levels. This study found that the promotion
of conservation agriculture technology has been affected
by a lack of common understanding as well as other social
and environmental issues that include open grazing
and complete removal of crop residues. The study also
indicated that there is untapped opportunity for the
wide-scale promotion of conservation agriculture.
2.1 Existing Farming Systems bean, field peas, lentils, chickpeas and haricot beans; oil
seeds like sesame, linseed, niger seed and rapeseed; and
The farming system in Ethiopia can be classified into five different types of fruits and vegetables (Central Statistical
major categories – the highland mixed farming system, Agency of Ethiopia, 2011). Even though the country is
lowland mixed agriculture, the pastoral system, shifting known to produce various types of crops, food insecurity
cultivation and commercial agriculture (Befekadu and is a major challenge.
Berhanu, 2000).
In Ethiopia over 95 percent of the annual gross total “Diverse agro-ecological conditions enable
agricultural output of the country is said to be generated
Ethiopia to grow a large variety of crops,
from smallholder farmers with an average farm size
which include cereals like teff, wheat,
ranging from 0.5 to 2 hectares. The contribution of
medium to large-scale commercial farms to gross total maize and barley; pulses like horse bean,
agricultural output is only about five percent (Central field peas, lentils, chickpeas and haricot
Statistical Agency of Ethiopia, 2011). Smallholder beans; oil seeds like sesame, linseed, niger
agriculture is the focus of this study. seed and rapeseed; and different types of
fruits and vegetables.”
The existence of diverse agro-ecological conditions enables
Ethiopia to grow a large variety of crops, which include
cereals like teff, wheat, maize and barley; pulses like horse
©FAO/Giulio Napolitano
of the farming systems in the country. It is the source of
many social and economic values such as food, draught
power, fuel, cash income, security and investment in both
the highlands and the lowlands as well as the pastoral
farming systems. As in the case of crops, the sector makes
a significant contribution to GDP and is a major source of
foreign exchange. However, the livestock resource of the
country is also characterized by low productivity levels.
At present the per capita consumption of milk and meat
is estimated to be the lowest in the world.
1 FAOSTAT, 2015
2.2 Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices Currently, agricultural development activities carried out
in the country are supported by a number of policies,
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is defined by FAO (2010) strategies and institutions. Of the numerous agricultural
as agriculture that sustainably increases productivity, development activities conducted, mention should be
enhances resilience of livelihoods and ecosystems, reduces made of those that are considered important in addressing
and/or removes greenhouse gases (GHGs) and enhances issues related to climate change and are contributing
achievement of national food security and development to climate change adaptation and mitigation. Such
goals. agricultural practices in Ethiopia include integrated
watershed management, integrated soil fertility
CSA includes proven practical techniques such as management, sustainable land management, conservation
mulching, intercropping, conservation agriculture, agriculture, agroforestry, crop residue management,
crop rotation, integrated crop-livestock management, composting, promotion of improved livestock feed and
agroforestry, improved grazing and improved water rangeland management.
management. CSA also involves innovative practices
such as improved weather forecasting, early-warning Integrated watershed management: Ethiopia is one of
systems and climate-risk insurance. CSA aims to get the countries seriously affected by land degradation, and
existing technologies off the shelf and into the hands addressing this problem is a major priority for the country.
of farmers, as well as to develop new technologies such In Ethiopia integrated watershed management is conducted
as drought-tolerant or flood-tolerant crops to meet the through various projects and programmes, which include
demands of the changing climate. the Sustainable Land Management Programmes (SLMP1
and SLMP2), Managing Environmental Resources to
2.2.1 CSA practices and technologies implemented Enable Transitions to more Sustainable Livelihoods
and adopted (MERET) project, Productive Safety Nets Programme
As part of livelihoods and food security improvement, – Public Works (PSNP-PW) and numerous NGOs. CSA
a multitude of agricultural development activities are in SLMP2 refers to proven practical techniques — such
conducted in Ethiopia, both traditionally and innovatively. as mulching, intercropping, conservation agriculture,
Debremawi Watershed is located in the Yilmanadensa District of Amhara Regional State. It has an estimated
total area of 700 hectares, with a total population of 3 000 households in two kebeles –Debremawi and
Fereswega. The area is characterized by midland agro-ecology and adequate rainfall. Agriculture in the form of
crop production and livestock rearing is the mainstay of the population. Maize is the main crop grown, while
teff, barley, faba bean and haricot bean are also major crops in the watershed. Farmers in the watershed also
rear cattle and small ruminants (sheep and goats). Agricultural productivity in the watershed is constrained
by numerous factors, particularly severe soil erosion and a decline in soil fertility, which are compounded by
the complete removal of crop residue for livestock feed and fuelwood while inadequate extension services
also play a role. It is to deal with this challenge that an NGO known as the Water and Land Resource Centre
(WLRC), in collaboration with Amhara Region Natural Resource Management Bureau, started an intervention
in 2012. The objective was to curb environmental degradation, improve agricultural productivity and contribute
to increased food security of the population. In order to accomplish this objective, activities conducted in
the watershed include physical soil conservation, demonstration of improved crop varieties and improved
livestock management.
Capacity building in the community through training of development agents and farmers and provision of
inputs like improved seeds are conducted by the NGO. In addition, the community is assisted in developing
their resilience to climate change and environmental degradation through creating community consensus on
these and other environmental hazards. As a result of the WLRCs’ work, the community agreed to enclose
degraded land and to use it for animal feed through a cut-and-carry system.
Environment, biodiversity and soils: Conservation agriculture has a significant impact in reducing soil
erosion through increased rainwater infiltration and buildup of soil organic matter for increased soil moisture
storage. Conservation agriculture can improve biodiversity at farm and community level and support improved
ecosystem services such as water and nutrient cycling. It can also support flood control through improved
water infiltration in agricultural fields.
Climate change mitigation: Evidence on conservation agriculture, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and
carbon sequestration indicates that conservation agriculture can help mitigate climate change by reducing
existing emission sources and sequestering carbon in soils and plant biomass. Baker et al. (2007) estimate
that the conversion of all croplands to conservation tillage globally could sequester 25 Gt C over the next
50 years. This is equivalent to 1 833 Mt CO2-eq/yr, making conservation tillage among the most significant
opportunities from all sectors for stabilizing global GHG concentrations. Scaling down these global estimates
to the continental, landscape or plot scale to estimate the mitigation potential of conservation agriculture in
sub-Saharan Africa entails considerable challenges. Overall there is insufficient information on the GHG
impacts of conservation agriculture practices, especially for developing countries in the tropics and subtropics
(Milder et al., 2011).
Soil fertility: In terms of soil fertility, the improved soil structure resulting from conservation agriculture
enhances aeration and other conditions required for efficient nutrient cycling. Soil organic matter has been
found to increase significantly over time in conservation agriculture systems, primarily due to the introduction
of additional organic matter as crop residues or mulch and to the reduction or elimination of tillage, which
tends to accelerate the oxidation of soil organic matter (Hobbs et al., 2008; Kassam et al., 2009). Zero tillage
systems are also associated with increased levels of available phosphorus in the upper soil layer (e.g. 0-5 cm),
due largely to the role of biological processes in phosphorus cycling (Milder et al., 2011).
Water management: Conservation agriculture has been found to have beneficial effects on water management
and water-use efficiency. With an increase in soil organic matter and root density under conservation agriculture,
water infiltration and water holding capacity are improved, making water more available throughout the
farming cycle. Kassam et al. (2009) reported that for each percent increase in soil organic matter, an additional
150 m3/ha of water can be stored in the soil (in Sintayehu, 2011). Surface mulches and improved soil pore
structure also increase infiltration and absorption capacity, while reducing evaporation. These benefits help
reduce the risk of erosion and flooding during heavy rains, contribute to aquifer recharge and make more
water available for crops.
Food security: Sustained and stable food production generated by conservation agriculture systems can
significantly improve the food security and nutritional status of vulnerable households and communities.
Conservation agriculture can help stabilize yields in the face of climate shocks such as droughts by reducing
evapotranspiration and regulating soil temperatures as well as supporting the management of pests and diseases
in crop production if appropriate crop rotations and combinations are used. These benefits are especially
important for poor and vulnerable smallholder farming households.
In the past, soil tillage has been associated with increased soil fertility. It has recently been recognized that,
in the long term, this process leads to a reduction of soil organic matter. Soil organic matter not only provides
nutrients for the crop, but is also a crucial element for the stabilization of soil structure. Therefore, most soils
degrade under prolonged intensive arable agriculture. This structural degradation of the soils results in the
formation of crusts and compaction, ultimately leading to soil erosion and reduced agricultural productivity.
As a result, the conservation agriculture components that are currently being promoted include:
Reduced tillage: In Ethiopia, land preparation is mainly carried out with a view of getting rid of weeds, but it
also helps in breaking compacted soils and improves moisture infiltration. However, moisture infiltration is
much better in soils that are less tilled but not compacted by the effect of overgrazing. Conservation agriculture
using reduced tillage in Ethiopia has been demonstrated on maize, wheat, teff, sorghum, faba bean and onion
and has shown successful results. Upscaling of conservation technology is currently under way.
Crop residue management: The success of conservation agriculture in Ethiopia is highly dependent on
crop residue management. Crop residues provide protective cover for the soil and increase soil infiltration.
Research has shown that when 35 percent of the soil surface is covered with uniformly distributed residues,
splash erosion will be reduced by up to 85 percent. Approximately two tons of maize residues per hectare are
necessary to obtain 35 percent soil cover, which has been established as the minimum amount required for
achieving a substantial reduction in relative soil erosion (Tolesa, 2001). In many parts of the country, however,
crop residues have traditionally been used for multiple purposes including fuel, building materials and animal
feed, which conflict with their use in conservation agriculture. Among these, livestock-related use (feed) is
probably the most widespread in the country.
Crop rotation and intercropping: In a system with reduced mechanical tillage based on mulch cover and
biological tillage, alternatives have to be developed to control pests and weeds. Practising crop rotation and
intercropping has many advantages, which include reduced risk of pest and weed infestations; better distribution
of water and nutrients through the soil profile; exploration for nutrients and water of diverse strata of the soil
profile by roots of many different plant species, resulting in a greater use of the available nutrients and water;
increased nitrogen fixation through certain plant-soil biota; improved balance of nitrogen, phosphorus and
potassium (N-P-K) from both organic and mineral sources; and increased formation of organic matter. Better
nutrient management through crop rotation can decrease nitrogen fertilizer use by up to 100 kg N per hectare
per year, substantially lowering related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (nitrous oxide has a global warming
potential 310 times greater than CO2) as well as reducing the costs of production. Reduced synthetic fertilizer
use also leads to reduced greenhouse gas emissions from the manufacturing process and transportation
(PANW, 2012). However, in most parts of the Ethiopian farming system farmers hardly practise crop rotation
and mono-cropping is the dominant cropping system.
©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
Severe land degradation caused by overgrazing
©FAO/Tamiru Legesse
Despite conservation agriculture having been introduced in Ethiopia over 16 years ago, adoption of the
practice remains low and has not progressed as fast is it could have. Some of the challenges in the promotion
and adoption of conservation agriculture in the country are listed below:
Inadequate integration of conservation agriculture into the Agricultural Extension Service: Conservation
agriculture promotion in Ethiopia has been implemented mainly by NGOs and private sector organizations,
while emphasis given by responsible government institutions like the Ministry of Agriculture, in particular the
Agricultural Extension Directorate, has not been sufficient in the past. In particular, conservation agriculture is
not adequately integrated into the existing agricultural extension delivery system of the MoA. In addition, since
conservation agriculture has mostly been implemented by NGOs, there has not been adequate government
follow-up, support and appropriate monitoring to ensure sustainability and wide adoption of the practice.
Open grazing system: Open grazing is a challenge not only to conservation agriculture in Ethiopia, but also
to overall agricultural development and environmental sustainability. Open grazing results in the removal of
crop residues from conservation agriculture fields and causes soil compaction that results in hard pans and
difficulty in planting using simple planters or simple rippers that are suitable for smallholders. If livestock are
accustomed to feeding on crop residues, a conflict of interest can be created when crop residues need to be
kept for mulching. Crop-livestock conflicts need to be considered when promoting conservation agriculture.
Lack of alternative energy sources: In most parts of rural Ethiopia, crop residue is not only used as a livestock
feed, but also as a fuelwood for cooking purposes. Most farmers do not have woodlots and hence crop residue
is one of the main sources of fuelwood for cooking. In promoting conservation agriculture there is a need to
consider mechanisms to support farmers to access alternative energy sources.
High input prices: Prices for high-quality inputs such as herbicides, fertilizer, improved seeds and implements
have been steadily increasing in Ethiopia and at times the prices are beyond the capacity of many smallholder
farmers. One example is non-selective herbicides which, according to farmers, have more than doubled in price
within three years. A means of supporting smallholder farmers to access inputs so that they can undertake
conservation agriculture and other CSA practices is needed.
Lack of availability of required inputs and equipment: It has frequently been reported that inputs such as
non-selective glyphosate-based herbicides are difficult to access and those that are available are not effective,
thus making it difficult for farmers to adopt conservation agriculture owing to weed problems. The same
applies to other inputs required for practising conservation agriculture such as seeds for rotation crops as well
as conservation agriculture implements such as rippers and direct seeders, which are not available at times
or, when available, are of poor quality.
Shortage of credit facilities: Credit service is an important factor that influences adoption of agricultural
technologies, especially for poor farmers who often have limited financial resources for purchasing agricultural
inputs and implements.
Sibusire is one of the woredas in the East Wollega Zone of Oromia Regional State where smallholder farmers
have adopted conservation agriculture. Ecologically the woreda is characterized by highland, midland and
lowland agro-ecology accounting for 70 percent, 20 percent and 10 percent of the land, respectively. Maize
is the dominant crop of the woreda, followed by teff and sorghum. Other crops like faba bean, field peas and
haricot bean are grown, but in smaller quantities.
The topography of the land is rugged, with numerous hills and dales as a result of which soil erosion is the
major form of land degradation. The overall crop productivity of the woreda is low owing to a decline in soil
fertility emanating from erosion, mono-cropping and a lack of adequate knowledge on improved agronomic
practices. Moreover, crop residue is completely removed, mainly for household fuelwood and livestock feed.
The remaining organic matter is burned for land-clearing purposes.
SG2000 Ethiopia began an intervention in the woreda in 2001 with the aim of improving overall crop productivity.
Conservation agriculture is one of the technologies employed. Woreda subject matter specialists (SMS),
development agents (DAs) and farmers were intensively trained in conservation agriculture practices which
included reduced tillage, crop residue management and crop rotation. Farmers were trained in appropriate
weed management technologies, with major emphasis on the application technique of non-selective herbicides,
particularly Roundup. Numerous maize and teff conservation agriculture demonstrations were conducted
and successful demonstration field days were organized.
In 2014 the report from the woreda office indicated that over 4 000 smallholder farmers were practising
conservation agriculture on an estimated 3 500 hectares of land, mainly on maize and teff crops. As part of
this study, visits were made to two of the kebeles – Chari and Burka-atalo. Agro-ecologically, Chari kebele is
mid-altitude with maize as the dominant crop, while Burka-atalo is high altitude and teff is the dominant crop.
Focus group discussions conducted with both teff and maize farmers in these kebeles indicated that the yield
of both crops under conservation agriculture is higher than the conventional method. Farmers also reported
a marked reduction in soil erosion, better build-up of soil organic matter and improved rainwater infiltration.
The main reasons for adoption of conservation agriculture reported by these farmers were improved yield and
the time-saving nature of conservation agriculture. Women farmers explained that conservation agriculture is
“pro poor”. Women farmers and both married and women-headed households benefited from conservation
agriculture technology, mostly through reduction in time spent in the fields.
©FAO/Melaku Jirata
©FAO/Melaku Jirata
©FAO/Melaku Jirata
and establishment of nurseries. The Ministry provides
training on the environmental, agricultural and nutritional
importance of the tree to encourage its use.
©FAO/Melaku Jirata
conducting research into agroforestry that includes field
trials of different tree species as well as planting densities
and tree-crop combinations and their impact on agricultural
yields and the physical environment.
©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
Vertisols occupy about 12.7 million hectares of land in Ethiopia, of which 7.6 million hectares (approximately
60 percent) are in the highlands (Tekalign et al., 1993). Most of the vertisols are prone to excess water and
poor workability and are underutilized. Vertisols are very susceptible to erosion and as a result the intensity
of degradation on vertisols is becoming very severe, which has an adverse effect on agricultural production
and productivity. Common crops grown on vertisols are teff, wheat, barley, chickpea, lentil, faba bean and
fenugreek (Trigonellafoenum graecum), but the yields of these crops are quite low as a result of water logging
and a lack of improved technology.
In an experiment carried out on vertisols in Ethiopia it was reported that grain and straw yields of plots that
were prepared using broad bed maker (BBM) and minimum tillage averaged 1.4t/ha and 3.37t/ha respectively
compared with significantly low corresponding yields of 0.91t/ha and 2.36t/ha respectively from conventionally
tilled plots (Joint Vertisol Project Progress Report No 9). This finding indicates that conservation agriculture
can be promoted effectively in vertisol areas of the country where the dominant crops are small cereals like
teff, wheat and barley.
©FAO/Tamiru Legesse
modification of the microclimate, which comes about through
a combination of reduced wind speed, lower temperatures,
higher humidity and greater infiltration of water into the
soil. The resulting healthier crops and livestock are essential
to community members’ nutritional status, health and
livelihoods, so the implications for development are enormous
(World Vision, 2009).
©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
Other agrodealers such as Lion International, Chemitex Other key stakeholders include the media, who play a key
and GCT could also play a key role in the adoption and role in spreading the message of climate-smart agriculture.
promotion of conservation agriculture, particularly
©FAO/AU/Yohannes Zirotti
The Ethiopian government has put in place a number of Ethiopia is a signatory to a number of multilateral
policies, strategies and institutions that are designed to agreements that have a bearing on the sustainable
support climate change adaptation and mitigation and development efforts of the country. Ethiopia has signed
sustainable development as a whole. and/or ratified many of the international conventions and
protocols related to climate change and land degradation
5.1 Policies and Strategies including the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (1994), the Convention on Biological
Policies, laws and strategies relevant to climate change in Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations Convention to
Ethiopia include the Climate Resilient Green Economy Combat Desertification (UNCCD).
Strategy (2011), National Adaptation Program of
Action (NAPA), Ethiopian Programme of Adaptation Climate Resilient Green Economy Strategy, 2011:
to Climate Change (EPACC) of 2011, Nationally The Climate Resilient Green Economy Strategy known
Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMA) of 2010, Rural as CRGE was developed in 2011 and launched at the
Development Policy and Strategies (2003), Growth and 17th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations
Transformation Plan (GTP), CAADP Compact and the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Durban
National Environmental Policy of Ethiopia (1997). in 2011. The strategy takes an economy-wide approach
to greenhouse gas reduction. According to the strategy,
Ethiopia aims to achieve carbon-neutral middle-income
“Ethiopia has signed and/or ratified many status before 2025. The strategy is based on four pillars,
of which the first two pillars are mainly related to CSA.
of the international conventions and
protocols related to climate change and • Agriculture: Improving crop and livestock production
land degradation.” practices for greater food security and better income
for farmers while reducing emissions.
The National SLM Technical Committee is also chaired The most recent strategy related to climate change is
by the State Minister for Natural Resources in MoA. It the CRGE, which was developed in 2011. Institutional
is made up of senior technical staff from institutions arrangements for coordinating and implementing public
such as the Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Water, policy responses for CRGE are being developed. The
Irrigation and Energy; Ministry of Finance and Economic responsibility of coordinating CRGE planning lies with
Development; Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Environment and Forests. The CRGE
Forestry; Ethiopian Institute for Agricultural Research Inter-Ministerial Committee, under the Council of
(EIAR); development partners supporting SLM projects Ministers, provides oversight of the CRGE process. This
or initiatives; and civil society organizations (NGOs) Committee is the top body within the CRGE institutional
actively engaged in SLM activities. Generally, this body arrangements. It is responsible for providing overall
is responsible for providing technical advice to MoA direction to the CRGE process and for approving financial
on SLM. decisions of the CRGE facility. The Committee comprises
State Ministers and senior officials from participating
5.3 Effectiveness of CSA Policies, Strategies and institutions. The Government of Ethiopia is designing
Institutions institutional arrangements that will enable demand-driven
articulation and implementation of CRGE investments.
In Ethiopia significant efforts are made to develop policies The proposed arrangements include outlining a role for
and strategies pertinent to climate change. Such policies implementing and executing entities, along with the
are also adequately integrated into subsequent government establishment of CRGE units within the implementing
plans such as the GTP. The GTP addresses climate change entities.
as a crosscutting issue under the strategic priority of
environment and climate change. It outlines building a In addition, policies such as the Environment Policy
climate-resilient green economy as a strategic priority are being operationalized through the development
for the plan period of 2010 to 2015. of District Environmental Management Plans, which
have been prepared and are being implemented in
A number of developmental projects and programmes various districts. Forest, soil and water conservation area
that are supported by policies have been initiated and enclosure activities have been exercised as main actions
implemented. Most of the work focused on soil and to achieve the desired goals.
water conservation, soil/land management for improved
agricultural productivity and reforestation practices. Despite the fact that policies are being operationalized,
Many projects conducted in the country were recognizable more needs to be done to implement the policies and
by their use of approaches for climate resilience and ensure their effectiveness. Another challenge is a lack of
adaptation. The MERET project and PSNP-PW are coordination and a relevant legislative framework and
among the early programmes and projects operating in consultations on climate change-related activities, projects,
Ethiopia aimed at curbing environmental degradation research programmes and responses that are currently
and focused mainly on reducing soil erosion through the undertaken by the various stakeholders, especially
construction of physical structures such as terraces, check between government NGOs and donor agencies. This
dams, cut-off drains and micro-basins, afforestation and may lead to duplication of efforts and inefficiencies in
revegetation of degraded and fragile hillside areas. A large project implementation.
volume of work has been done in such areas and some
ecological and agricultural benefits have been obtained.
• There is willingness and commitment from the • Resources are available in the form of projects and
government to reduce poverty and ensure food programmes like AGP, SLM, PSNP and others. These
security while addressing climate change. The projects are operating in many parts of the country
government has developed policies and strategies under various agro-ecological zones and farming
that are pertinent to ensure food security as well systems.
as address climate change. The government has
moreover ratified international climate change-related • There are private sector organizations and numerous
conventions. NGOs in the country. At grassroots level there are
also adequate numbers of extension and development
• The country has developed a comprehensive green agents to create climate-related awareness, provide
growth strategy that encompasses agriculture in capacity-building training and promote climate-smart
the form of the Climate Resilient Green Economy agricultural activities.
Aklilu, A. and Alebachew, A. 2009. Assessment of climate Lamourdia, T. 2010. Upscaling Conservation Agriculture.
change-induced hazards, impacts and responses in the southern Proceedings of the workshop on Conservation Agriculture in
lowlands of Ethiopia. Forum for Social Studies, Addis Ababa. Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Woodfine, A. 2009. The Potential of Sustainable Land MoA. 2014. Natural resource activities implemented in the GTP.
Management Practices for Climate Change Mitigation and
MOFED. 2003. Rural Development Policy and Strategy
Adaptation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technical Report for
Document.
TerrAfrica.
MOFED. 2010. Growth and Transformation Plan 2010/11-
Baker, J.M., Ochsner, T.E., Venterea, R.T. & Griffis, T.J. 2007.
2014/15. Volume 1: main text. Addis Ababa.
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration - what do we really know?
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 118: 1–5. PANW. 2012. Crop rotation benefiting farmers, the environment
and economy. Friends of the Earth Europe, EU group and
Befekadu, D. and Berhanu, N. 2000. Annual Report on
APRODEV.
the Ethiopian Economy, Vol. I. The Ethiopian Economic
Association. Senay, H. 2012. United Nations Development Programme.
304 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017, USA. www.undp.
Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia. 2011. Large and medium
org/gender.
scale commercial farm survey 2010/11. Results at country and
regional levels. V-Viii. Addis Ababa. Shimeles, A. 2014. Selected CA case studies in Ethiopia. EIAR/
NARS. Presentation made at the Eastern Africa Sub-regional
Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia. 2012. Report on area
CSA Workshop held in Nairobi, Kenya. 29 September 2014.
and production of major crops. Private peasant holding, meher
season. V-1. Addis Ababa. Sintayehu, W. 2011. Presentation made at the National Policy
Workshop on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation.
Derpsch, R., Friedrich, T., Kassam, A. and Li, H.W. 2010.
Climate Change Forum and CCAFS, 2011.
Current status of adoption of no till farming in the world and
some of its main benefits. Int. J. Agric. and Biol. Eng. Vol. 3. No 1. Sustainable Land Management Project Document. 2013.
Ethiopia Climate Resilient Green Economy Strategy. 2011. Tekalign, M., Mohamed-Saleem, A. and Abate, T. 1993.
Development of coordinated efforts. In: Tekalign Mamo, Abiye
Ethiopia National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPA).
Astatke, K.L. Srivastava and Asgelil Dibabe (Eds.)
2007.
Tesfa, B. 2001. Report of research on maize tillage system at
FAO. 2010. “Climate-Smart” Agriculture: Policies, Practices
Jima Research Centre. In: Proceedings of the workshop on
and Financing for Food Security, Adaptation and Mitigation.
conservation tillage. February 28 to March 1, 2001, Melkasa
Paper prepared for Hague Conference on Agriculture, Food
Research Centre, Nazreth.
Security and Climate Change.
Tolesa, D. 2001. Conservation tillage experiments at Bako
FDRE. 2011. Agriculture Sector Programme of Plan on
Research Centre. West Showa Zone. In: Proceeding of the
Adaptation to Climate Change. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
workshop on conservation tillage. February 28 to March 1,
Hobbs, N.T., Galvin, K.A., Stokes, C.J., Lackett, J.M., Ash, A.J., 2001, Melkasa Research Centre, Nazreth.
Boone, R.B. 2008. Fragmentation of rangelands: implications
WABEKBON. 2006. Ethiopia. Country Gender Profile.
for humans, animals, and landscapes. Global Enivron. Change,
Wabekbon Development Consultants, Addis Ababa.
18, 776 -785.
Wondwossen, T., Dejene A., La Rovere, R., Mwangi, W.,
Milder, J.C., Majanen, T. and Scherr, S.J. 2011. Performance
Mwabu, G., and Tesfahun, G. 2008. Does Partial Adoption of
and Potential of Conservation Agriculture for Climate
Conservation Agriculture Affect Crop Yields and Labour Use?
Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Evidence from Two Districts in Ethiopia. CIMMYT/SG 2000.
An assessment of WWF and CARE projects in support of the
WWF-CARE Alliance’s Rural Futures Initiative. Worku, B. 2001. In: Proceedings of the national workshop on
conservation agriculture at Melkasa. Organized by SG2000.
JVP. 2000. The Joint Vertisol Management Project: Summary
Melkasa, Nazreth.
of Achievements and Lessons learnt. Addis Ababa.
World Vision. 2006. Humbo/Soddo Community Based Forest
Kassam A. H., Friedrich T., Shaxson T. F. and Pretty J. N.
Management Project. South Branch Office, Humbo ADP.
2009. The spread of Conservation Agriculture: Justification,
sustainability and uptake. International Journal of Agriculture World Vision. 2009. Humbo Community managed forestry
Sustainability 7: 292-320. project, Ethiopia. Climate change, community forest and
development.
Kitalyi, A., Nyadzi, G., Lutkamu, M., Swai, R. and Gama, B. 2011.
New climate, new agriculture: how Agroforestry contributes to
meeting the challenges of Agricultural development in Tanzania.
Tanzanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10 (1): 1 – 7.
Sebastian Grey
Natural Resources Officer
FAO Sub-regional Office for Eastern Africa
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Tel: +251 11 647 8888
E-mail: [email protected]
www.fao.org
I5518E/1/03.16