0269-7491 Generatepdf True
0269-7491 Generatepdf True
• Description p.1
• Audience p.2
• Impact Factor p.2
• Abstracting and Indexing p.2
• Editorial Board p.2
• Guide for Authors p.8
ISSN: 0269-7491
DESCRIPTION
.
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality research
papers and review articles about all aspects of environmental pollution and its effects on ecosystems
and human health. The journal welcomes high-quality process-oriented and hypothesis-based
submissions that report results from original and novel research and contribute new knowledge to
help address problems related to environmental pollution at a regional or global scale.
Papers focusing on the following areas are likely to be returned to the authors without
review:
• Routine surveys or monitoring programs primarily of local or regional interest;
• Descriptions of well-known contaminants, such as legacy pollutants, in yet another location;
• Studies relating to waste treatment that do not have specific relevance to pollution within the
environment;
• Synthesis/fabrication of new materials solely for remediation and/or mitigation of pollution without
any direct environmental relevance;
• Nitrogen or phosphorus deposition or biogeochemical processes with little or no relation to
environmental consequences and/or climate change;
• Studies on eutrophication and secondary pollution by eutrophication without illuminating their
governing mechanisms and factors;
Please DO NOT ask the Editors-in-Chief for permission before submitting a manuscript.
Kindly check the guidelines to determine whether your manuscript is within the scope of
the journal; if yes, please go ahead and submit it.
AUDIENCE
.
IMPACT FACTOR
.
PubMed/Medline
Environmental Periodicals Bibliography
Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology & Environmental Sciences
Science Citation Index
AGRICOLA
Energy Information Abstracts
Embase
Air Pollution Control Association Journal
Biological and Agricultural Index
GeoSciTech
Web of Science
Scopus
EDITORIAL BOARD
.
Co-Editors-in-Chief
Jörg Rinklebe, University of Wuppertal School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Wuppertal, Germany
Trace elements in the environment, Soil, Water, Plant, Environmental pollution
Christian Sonne, Aarhus University, Department of Environmental Science, Roskilde, Denmark
Biological effects, environmental chemicals, infectious diseases, climate change, veterinary
science, wildlife medicine, predatory mammals, raptorial birds, sea birds, fish, internal
organs, reproductive organs, histopathology, morphology, skeletal system, bone density, immune
system, endocrinology, PBPK modelling, blood biochemistry, implantation of PTT satellite
transmitters, immobilization.
Eddy Zeng, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Persistent organic pollutants, Bioaccumulation, Human exposure, Health risk assessment, Inter-
compartmental diffusion flux, Passive sampling, Wet and dry deposition
Special Issue Editors
Da Chen, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Environmental chemistry, Analytical chemistry, Ecotoxicology, Persistent organic pollutants, Flame
retardants, Pesticides, Mass spectrometry, Gas/liquid chormatography
Su Shiung Lam, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Environmental Technology, Environmental Pollution, Thermal Process
(Pyrolysis, Gasification, Torrefaction), Waste Management, Biofuel, Waste Valorization/
Utilization, Energy Conversion, Water and Wastewater Treatment, Catalytic Application, Green
Material Synthesis, Biochar, Microwave, Wastewater, Pollution Detection/Mitigation, Green
Technology/Chemistry
Introduction
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality research
papers and review articles about all aspects of environmental pollution and its effects on ecosystems
and human health. The journal welcomes high-quality process-oriented and hypothesis-based
submissions that report results from original and novel research and contribute new knowledge to
help address problems related to environmental pollution at a regional or global scale.
Papers focusing on the following areas are likely to be returned to the authors without
review:
• Routine surveys or monitoring programs primarily of local or regional interest;
• Descriptions of well-known contaminants, such as legacy pollutants, in yet another location;
• Studies relating to waste treatment that do not have specific relevance to pollution within the
environment;
• Synthesis/fabrication of new materials solely for remediation and/or mitigation of pollution without
any direct environmental relevance;
• Nitrogen or phosphorus deposition or biogeochemical processes with little or no relation to
environmental consequences and/or climate change;
• Studies on eutrophication and secondary pollution by eutrophication without illuminating their
governing mechanisms and factors;
• Studies within which the concentrations of toxicants used are higher than those that are
typically found in an environmental pollution context. Authors of toxicology studies must justify the
concentrations that they are using by reference to environmentally relevant concentrations that have
been reported in the literature.
Please DO NOT ask the Editors-in-Chief for permission before submitting a manuscript.
Kindly check the guidelines to determine whether your manuscript is within the scope of
the journal; if yes, please go ahead and submit it.
The abstract (up to 300 words), highlights and conclusions of papers in this journal must contain clear
and concise statements. A graphical abstract is mandatory.
Review Articles: Authors may submit manuscripts that provide in-depth critical review of a special
subject. These reviews must provide a Synthesis and Critical Evaluation of the state of the knowledge
of the subject and indicate research directions. The Editors also periodically invite review articles.
Manuscripts should not exceed 10,000 words, as defined above.
We also encourage Systematic Reviews that provide a comprehensive summary and critical appraisal
of existing evidence. They relate to answering a research question, and are conducted using methods
which seek to minimize risk of bias in results and conclusions. A systematic review should include
a meta-analysis, which uses statistical techniques to pool the results of multiple individual studies
into a combined summary result.
Short Communication: Short Communications may be submitted that express opinions and
concerns, suggest research priorities and question conventional methodologies and conclusions.
Manuscripts should include an Abstract, Introduction, Presentation of the Concerns or Analysis and
Conclusions. References, Tables and Illustrations should be used sparingly. The manuscript should not
exceed 12 double-spaced pages. The Editors will evaluate all manuscripts for suitability of publication,
including peer review.
Correspondence: Readers are encouraged to write to any of the Editors (Letter to Editor) and raise
issues and concerns about papers published in the journal. Editors or authors will be invited to submit
a Reply to respond to points raised. The Editor will decide on the publication of Correspondence
and Replies based on scientific merit, importance to the raised issues, and interest to the general
audience. Correspondence and Replies of an unprofessional or unscientific nature, or containing
personal invective, will not be considered.
Corrigendum: Authors may submit Corrigenda to alert the readership to errors discovered in their
articles post-publication.
Special Issues: Proposals for Special Issues of Full Research Papers that focus on a specific topic
or theme will also be considered. Special Issues will be published on emerging thematic issues and
innovative conferences. An Editor or Associate Editor should be contacted early in the conference
planning process to get approval and for guidelines on special issues of the journal. Furthermore, the
Editors or Associate Editors will invite leading experts as Guest Editors for Special Issues. Editorials
for Special issues are submitted by invitation only through the Editorial Manager portal.
Submission checklist
You can use this list to carry out a final check of your submission before you send it to the journal for
review. Please check the relevant section in this Guide for Authors for more details.
One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address
Further considerations
• Manuscript has been 'spell checked' and 'grammar checked'
• All references mentioned in the Reference List are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the
Internet)
• A competing interests statement is provided, even if the authors have no competing interests to
declare
• Journal policies detailed in this guide have been reviewed
• Referee suggestions and contact details provided, based on journal requirements
Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for
experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
All animal experiments should comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and should be carried out in
accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines, EU
Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments, or the National Research Council's Guide for the Care
and Use of Laboratory Animals and the authors should clearly indicate in the manuscript that such
guidelines have been followed. The sex of animals must be indicated, and where appropriate, the
influence (or association) of sex on the results of the study.
Declaration of competing interest
Corresponding authors, on behalf of all the authors of a submission, must disclose any financial
and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence
(bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies,
stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or
other funding. All authors, including those without competing interests to declare, should provide
the relevant information to the corresponding author (which, where relevant, may specify they have
nothing to declare). Corresponding authors should then use this tool to create a shared statement
and upload to the submission system at the Attach Files step. Please do not convert the .docx
template to another file type. Author signatures are not required.
Submission declaration and verification
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in
the form of an abstract, a published lecture or academic thesis, see 'Multiple, redundant or concurrent
publication' for more information), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that
its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where
the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in
During submission to Editorial Manager, you can choose to release your manuscript publicly as a
preprint on the preprint server SSRN once it enters peer-review with the journal. Your choice will have
no effect on the editorial process or outcome with the journal. Please note that the corresponding
author is expected to seek approval from all co-authors before agreeing to release the manuscript
publicly on SSRN.
You will be notified via email when your preprint is posted online and a Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
is assigned. Your preprint will remain globally available free to read whether the journal accepts or
rejects your manuscript.
For more information about posting to SSRN, please consult the SSRN Terms of Use and FAQs.
Use of inclusive language
Inclusive language acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences,
and promotes equal opportunities. Content should make no assumptions about the beliefs or
commitments of any reader; contain nothing which might imply that one individual is superior to
another on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or health
condition; and use inclusive language throughout. Authors should ensure that writing is free from bias,
stereotypes, slang, reference to dominant culture and/or cultural assumptions. We advise to seek
gender neutrality by using plural nouns ("clinicians, patients/clients") as default/wherever possible
to avoid using "he, she," or "he/she." We recommend avoiding the use of descriptors that refer
to personal attributes such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, disability or
health condition unless they are relevant and valid. When coding terminology is used, we recommend
to avoid offensive or exclusionary terms such as "master", "slave", "blacklist" and "whitelist". We
suggest using alternatives that are more appropriate and (self-) explanatory such as "primary",
"secondary", "blocklist" and "allowlist". These guidelines are meant as a point of reference to help
identify appropriate language but are by no means exhaustive or definitive.
Reporting sex- and gender-based analyses
Reporting guidance
For research involving or pertaining to humans, animals or eukaryotic cells, investigators should
integrate sex and gender-based analyses (SGBA) into their research design according to funder/
sponsor requirements and best practices within a field. Authors should address the sex and/or gender
dimensions of their research in their article. In cases where they cannot, they should discuss this
as a limitation to their research's generalizability. Importantly, authors should explicitly state what
definitions of sex and/or gender they are applying to enhance the precision, rigor and reproducibility
of their research and to avoid ambiguity or conflation of terms and the constructs to which they
refer (see Definitions section below). Authors can refer to the Sex and Gender Equity in Research
(SAGER) guidelines and the SAGER guidelines checklist. These offer systematic approaches to the use
and editorial review of sex and gender information in study design, data analysis, outcome reporting
and research interpretation - however, please note there is no single, universally agreed-upon set of
guidelines for defining sex and gender.
Definitions
Authors are asked to think carefully about the eligibility criteria for authorship, and ensure that
authorship is extended ONLY to those who have made substantial contributions to ALL of the following:
(1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of
data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval
of the version to be submitted.
Changes to authorship
Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their
manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any
addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should be made only
before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the journal Editor. To request such
a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason
for the change in author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail, letter) from all authors that they
agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement. In the case of addition or removal of authors,
this includes confirmation from the author being added or removed.
Only in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the addition, deletion or rearrangement of
authors after the manuscript has been accepted. While the Editor considers the request, publication
of the manuscript will be suspended. If the manuscript has already been published in an online issue,
any requests approved by the Editor will result in a corrigendum.
Failure to observe the process outlined above to request a change of authorship may result
in rejection of the manuscript involved. Environmental Pollution does not permit multiple
corresponding authors.
Article transfer service
This journal uses the Elsevier Article Transfer Service to find the best home for your manuscript. This
means that if an editor feels your manuscript is more suitable for an alternative journal, you might
be asked to consider transferring the manuscript to such a journal. The recommendation might be
provided by a Journal Editor, a dedicated Scientific Managing Editor, a tool assisted recommendation,
or a combination. If you agree, your manuscript will be transferred, though you will have the
opportunity to make changes to the manuscript before the submission is complete. Please note that
your manuscript will be independently reviewed by the new journal. More information.
Copyright
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' (see
more information on this). An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of
the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form or a link to the online version
of this agreement.
For gold open access articles: Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a
'License Agreement' (more information). Permitted third party reuse of gold open access articles is
determined by the author's choice of user license.
Author rights
As an author you (or your employer or institution) have certain rights to reuse your work. More
information.
Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how you can share your research published in Elsevier journals.
Role of the funding source
You are requested to identify who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or
preparation of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in
the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to
submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement, it is recommended
to state this.
Open access
Please visit our Open Access page for more information.
Elsevier Researcher Academy
Researcher Academy is a free e-learning platform designed to support early and mid-career
researchers throughout their research journey. The "Learn" environment at Researcher Academy
offers several interactive modules, webinars, downloadable guides and resources to guide you through
the process of writing for research and going through peer review. Feel free to use these free resources
to improve your submission and navigate the publication process with ease.
Language (usage and editing services)
Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of
these). Authors who feel their English language manuscript may require editing to eliminate possible
grammatical or spelling errors and to conform to correct scientific English may wish to use the English
Language Editing service available from Elsevier's Author Services.
Submission
Our online submission system guides you stepwise through the process of entering your article
details and uploading your files. The system converts your article files to a single PDF file used in
the peer-review process. Editable files (e.g., Word, LaTeX) are required to typeset your article for
final publication. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for
revision, is sent by e-mail.
Authors are requested to choose an editor most appropriate to their research field during
the submission process in the "Provide additional information tab" during the submission
process.
Submit your article
Please submit your article via https://www.editorialmanager.com/envpol.
Suggesting reviewers
Please submit the names and institutional e-mail addresses of several potential reviewers.
You should not suggest reviewers who are colleagues, or who have co-authored or collaborated with
you during the last three years. Editors do not invite reviewers who have potential competing interests
with the authors. Further, in order to provide a broad and balanced assessment of the work, and ensure
scientific rigor, please suggest diverse candidate reviewers who are located in different countries/
regions from the author group. Also consider other diversity attributes e.g. gender, race and ethnicity,
career stage, etc. Finally, you should not include existing members of the journal's editorial team,
of whom the journal are already aware.
PREPARATION
Queries
For questions about the editorial process (including the status of manuscripts under review) or for
technical support on submissions, please visit our Support Center.
NEW SUBMISSIONS
Submission to this journal proceeds totally online and you will be guided stepwise through the creation
and uploading of your files. The system automatically converts your files to a single PDF file, which
is used in the peer-review process.
As part of the Your Paper Your Way service, you may choose to submit your manuscript as a single file
to be used in the refereeing process. This can be a PDF file or a Word document, in any format or lay-
out that can be used by referees to evaluate your manuscript. It should contain high enough quality
figures for refereeing. If you prefer to do so, you may still provide all or some of the source files at
the initial submission. Please note that individual figure files larger than 10 MB must be uploaded
separately.
References
There are no strict requirements on reference formatting at submission. References can be in any
style or format as long as the style is consistent. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/
book title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/book chapter and the article
number or pagination must be present. Use of DOI is highly encouraged. The reference style used by
the journal will be applied to the accepted article by Elsevier at the proof stage. Note that missing
data will be highlighted at proof stage for the author to correct.
Formatting requirements
There are no strict formatting requirements but all manuscripts must contain the essential elements
needed to convey your manuscript, for example Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and
Methods, Results, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions.
If your article includes any Videos and/or other Supplementary material, this should be included in
your initial submission for peer review purposes.
Divide the article into clearly defined sections.
Please ensure your paper has consecutive and continuous line numbering before uploading
your source files - this is an essential peer review requirement.
Please ensure that any figures and tables included in the single file are placed at the end
of the main text in the manuscript.
Peer review
This journal operates a single anonymized review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by
the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of
two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible
for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. Editors
are not involved in decisions about papers which they have written themselves or have been written
by family members or colleagues or which relate to products or services in which the editor has an
interest. Any such submission is subject to all of the journal's usual procedures, with peer review
handled independently of the relevant editor and their research groups. More information on types
of peer review.
REVISED SUBMISSIONS
Please note that authors have a maximum of 6 weeks to resubmit a revised manuscript,
unless an extension is requested from the editor. When you submit your revised manuscript,
please ensure to remove all the old files pertaining to the original submission and make sure to
have the "Revised Manuscript" under the manuscript category along with the respective figures\tables
Highlights should be submitted in a separate editable file in the online submission system. Please
use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including
spaces, per bullet point).
Abstract
A concise and factual abstract is required. The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the
research, the principal results and major conclusions. An abstract is often presented separately from
the article, so it must be able to stand alone. For this reason, References should be avoided, but if
essential, then cite the author(s) and year(s). Also, non-standard or uncommon abbreviations should
be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstract itself.
The maximum abstract length is 300 words.
Graphical abstract
A graphical abstract is mandatory for all Research Papers, Review Articles and Short Communications
submitted to this journal. It does not need to be uploaded with the initial submission but must
be supplied with any subsequent revisions. It should summarize the contents of the article in a
concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Authors must
provide images that clearly represent the work described in the article. Graphical abstracts should be
submitted as a separate file in the online submission system. Image size: please provide an image
with a minimum of 531 × 1328 pixels (h × w) or proportionally more. The image should be readable
at a size of 5 × 13 cm using a regular screen resolution of 96 dpi. Preferred file types: TIFF, EPS, PDF
or MS Office files. See https://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts for examples.
Authors can make use of Elsevier's Illustration and Enhancement service to ensure the best
presentation of their images also in accordance with all technical requirements: Illustration Service.
Keywords
Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 6 keywords, using American spelling and
avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, 'and', 'of'). Be sparing
with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible. These keywords
will be used for indexing purposes.
Abbreviations
Define abbreviations that are not standard in this field in a footnote to be placed on the first page
of the article. Such abbreviations that are unavoidable in the abstract must be defined at their first
mention there, as well as in the footnote. Ensure consistency of abbreviations throughout the article.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers xxxx, yyyy];
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number zzzz]; and the United States Institutes
of Peace [grant number aaaa].
It is not necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants and awards. When
funding is from a block grant or other resources available to a university, college, or other research
institution, submit the name of the institute or organization that provided the funding.
If no funding has been provided for the research, it is recommended to include the following sentence:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or
not-for-profit sectors.
Units
Follow internationally accepted rules and conventions: use the international system of units (SI). If
other units are mentioned, please give their equivalent in SI.
Temperatures should be given in degrees Celsius.
Math formulae
Please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Present simple formulae in
line with normal text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small
fractional terms, e.g., X/Y. In principle, variables are to be presented in italics. Powers of e are often
more conveniently denoted by exp. Number consecutively any equations that have to be displayed
separately from the text (if referred to explicitly in the text).
Footnotes
Footnotes should be used sparingly. Number them consecutively throughout the article. Many word
processors build footnotes into the text, and this feature may be used. Should this not be the case,
indicate the position of footnotes in the text and present the footnotes themselves separately at the
end of the article.
Artwork
Image manipulation
Whilst it is accepted that authors sometimes need to manipulate images for clarity, manipulation for
purposes of deception or fraud will be seen as scientific ethical abuse and will be dealt with accordingly.
For graphical images, this journal is applying the following policy: no specific feature within an image
may be enhanced, obscured, moved, removed, or introduced. Adjustments of brightness, contrast,
or color balance are acceptable if and as long as they do not obscure or eliminate any information
present in the original. Nonlinear adjustments (e.g. changes to gamma settings) must be disclosed
in the figure legend.
Electronic artwork
General points
• Make sure you use uniform lettering and sizing of your original artwork.
• Preferred fonts: Arial (or Helvetica), Times New Roman (or Times), Symbol, Courier.
• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.
• Use a logical naming convention for your artwork files.
• Indicate per figure if it is a single, 1.5 or 2-column fitting image.
• For Word submissions only, you may still provide figures and their captions, and tables within a
single file at the revision stage.
• Please note that individual figure files larger than 10 MB must be provided in separate source files.
A DOI is guaranteed never to change, so you can use it as a permanent link to any electronic article.
An example of a citation using DOI for an article not yet in an issue is: VanDecar J.C., Russo R.M.,
James D.E., Ambeh W.B., Franke M. (2003). Aseismic continuation of the Lesser Antilles slab beneath
northeastern Venezuela. Journal of Geophysical Research, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000884.
Please note the format of such citations should be in the same style as all other references in the paper.
There are different ways to link your datasets to your article. When available, you can directly link
your dataset to your article by providing the relevant information in the submission system. For more
information, visit the database linking page.
For supported data repositories a repository banner will automatically appear next to your published
article on ScienceDirect.
In addition, you can link to relevant data or entities through identifiers within the text of your
manuscript, using the following format: Database: xxxx (e.g., TAIR: AT1G01020; CCDC: 734053;
PDB: 1XFN).
Research Elements
This journal enables you to publish research objects related to your original research – such as data,
methods, protocols, software and hardware – as an additional paper in Research Elements.
Research Elements is a suite of peer-reviewed, open access journals which make your research objects
findable, accessible and reusable. Articles place research objects into context by providing detailed
descriptions of objects and their application, and linking to the associated original research articles.
Research Elements articles can be prepared by you, or by one of your collaborators.
During submission, you will be alerted to the opportunity to prepare and submit a Research Elements
article.
AFTER ACCEPTANCE
Online proof correction
To ensure a fast publication process of the article, we kindly ask authors to provide us with their proof
corrections within two days. Corresponding authors will receive an e-mail with a link to our online
proofing system, allowing annotation and correction of proofs online. The environment is similar to
MS Word: in addition to editing text, you can also comment on figures/tables and answer questions
from the Copy Editor. Web-based proofing provides a faster and less error-prone process by allowing
you to directly type your corrections, eliminating the potential introduction of errors.
If preferred, you can still choose to annotate and upload your edits on the PDF version. All instructions
for proofing will be given in the e-mail we send to authors, including alternative methods to the online
version and PDF.
We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately. Please use this
proof only for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and correctness of the text, tables and
figures. Significant changes to the article as accepted for publication will only be considered at this
stage with permission from the Editor. It is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back
to us in one communication. Please check carefully before replying, as inclusion of any subsequent
corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibility.
AUTHOR INQUIRIES
Visit the Elsevier Support Center to find the answers you need. Here you will find everything from
Frequently Asked Questions to ways to get in touch.
You can also check the status of your submitted article or find out when your accepted article will
be published.
© Copyright 2018 Elsevier | https://www.elsevier.com