Fundamental Concepts Chapter - Pure Maths Guide From Love of Maths
Fundamental Concepts Chapter - Pure Maths Guide From Love of Maths
"The true spirit of delight, the exaltation, the sense of being more
than man, which is the touchstone of the highest excellence, is to
be found in Mathematics as surely as in poetry."
Bertrand Russell
John Waterman
Acknowledgements
I am hugely grateful for numerous helpful comments and suggestions from
Ian Christie and Mike Fairbank, Abbey College London, Alan Gregory MBE,
Prof Alastair McDonald, Barry Ainge, Sam Waterman, Steve Gooch, Ilona
Hurrell, Joe Waterman and Mike McGuire.
I particularly want to thank Matt Joy who, as a seasoned journalist, patiently
pointed the need for simplicity and succinct brevity. And Victor
Lunn-Rockliffe, with whom I spent many hours exploring how best to make
the layout and presentation as inviting as possible.
I want to thank Dan Balis and two of my grandchildren, Ethan and Sekai,
who road-tested some of it in the latter stages of development.
Most importantly, I need to acknowledge the hundreds of other students
whom I have had the privilege to teach, and who have contributed
immeasurably, albeit unwittingly, to this book.
Finally to my wife Anne who, despite having not the slightest interest in
Mathematics, patiently encouraged me over the many times it looked like it
would never get finished.
John Waterman, May 2019
Love of Maths Pure Maths Guide First edition published by Love of Maths Ltd
June 2021.
Contents
FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
Overview
Each chapter begins with a detailed description of its contents like the one
below, so you can skip any part you don’t need. If you are not sure what you
need the exercises will tell you.
1.1 Some of the terminology and notation you’ll need around number
systems: integers, prime numbers, rational & irrational numbers, Real
numbers. Converting a recurring decimal into a fraction.
Also a fascinating glimpse into a special type of number with mind-blowing
properties.
1.2 ∞ (infinity).
1.3 Commutativity and Associativity, two very important principles.
1.4 The language and notation of sets. The symbols ∈, ⊆, ∩ and ∪.
Subsets, union and intersection of sets
1.5 Equations, some language and an important principle.
Polynomial equations. The quadratic formula.
1.6 Inequalities. Basic principles.
1.7 Identities and the notion of equivalence (≡).
Difference between an equation and an identity.
1.8 A reminder about function notation. For example:
If f (x) = 1 + x2 , find f (−1) and solve the equation f (x) = x.
1.9 Introduction to mathematical reasoning and proof.
The symbols ⇐, ⇒, ⇐⇒ and ∴ An example of using elegant reasoning to
effortlessly solve a very difficult problem.
1.10 A review of directed numbers. For example:
Why is −4 − 6 = −10 when a rule says “two minuses make a plus"?
p
Simplifying an expression like b 2 − 4ac, if a = k, b = −k and c = −2k.
1-1
CHAPTER 1. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
1.1 Numbers
First some definitions, and a bit of background on number systems. Most of
this will be very straight forward, but behind the obvious all is not as simple
as it first appears, and you will get a glimpse of this here.
N = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, . . .
The row of dots at the end is our way of saying that the list goes on for ever.
For many thousand of years these were the only numbers humans used, so
there could be no notion of subtracting a bigger number from a smaller one,
and doing calculations with fractions would be out of the question. It would
only be in relatively recent times that a symbol for nothing (i.e. zero) was
introduced, without which even simple arithmetic is extremely difficult. This
was a crucial breakthrough1 .
1
The first recorded zero is attributed to the Babylonians in the 3rd century BC. A long
period followed when no one else used a zero place holder, until the Mayans independently
invented zero in the fourth century AD. The final independent invention of zero in India was
long debated by scholars, but seems to be set around the middle of the fifth century. It spread
to Cambodia around the end of the 7th century. From India it moved into China and then to
the Islamic countries. Zero finally reached western Europe in the 12th century (see Kristen
McQuillin, January 2004). The West got there in the end.
You are most likely to meet prime numbers in the context of finding the
prime factorisation of a number. For example 2400 = 3 × 25 × 52 .
If this is a new idea to you, find the prime factorisation of 504 (the answer is
in the footnote3 .)
2
The four factors we just listed plus 1 and 50
3
504 = 2 × 252 = 22 × 126 = 23 × 63 = 23 × 7 × 9 = 23 × 32 × 7
We can break the number down in any order, but it’s obviously easiest to start with
low numbers like 2, 3 etc.
1.1.3 Integers
The Integers are all the Natural Numbers, together with their negative
counterparts and 0. We use the symbol Z for these:
The dots at each end mean that the list extends indefinitely in both directions.
Without the negative numbers and zero, all but the most basic arithmetic is
very difficult (try multiplying Roman numerals). Once they were included,
whole new branches of mathematics started to blossom (excuse the pun).
Sometimes you will see the symbols Z+ and Z− . These stand respectively for
the positive integers and the negative integers, excluding zero:
2 376 1 1
, , − , 4 and 13
5 2117 3047 2
1 −1 4 1 27
because − 3047 = 3047 , 4 = 1 and 13 2 = 2 .
4 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 4
This gives you a clue as to how it can be done: 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 4 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 5 ...
x = 0.1̇035̇ = 0.10351035 . . .
10, 000x = 1035.1̇035̇ = 1035.10351035 . . .
We have chosen to multiply x by 10, 000 because that gives us a new number
with exactly the same digits after the decimal point, and which therefore
differs from x by a whole number.
9, 999x = 1035
hence 1035
x= .
9999
Cancelling6 this gives:
115
0.1̇035̇ = .
1111
If this technique is new to you, try it out for yourself using the number
0.297297 . . .. The answer is in the footnote7 .
For the answer turn to page ?? of Appendix A, or click on the page number.
5
A recurring decimal has the property that after a certain point the same digit, or
sequence of digits, is constantly repeated, e.g. 0.7777 . . . or 0.061137419419419 . . ..
6
You may recall that a number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible
by 3. Similarly, a number is divisible by 9 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9.
These are the only two numbers for which this simple “sum of digits” test works.
7 11
0.2̇97̇ =
37
You might expect that the irrational numbers are very much the
exception, i.e. most numbers are rational. In fact you couldn’t
be more wrong. There is an infinite number of rationals and
an infinite number of irrationals. But it doesn’t end there: it
turns out that there are so many more irrationals, the only way
we can describe the difference is to say that the kind of infinity
involved is of a higher order. So there we have it: not only does
the answer turn our intuition on its head, we discover that
some infinities are bigger than others!
When you see the term Real number, you can (for now) just think of it as any
number.
So why add the word “Real" at all? It’s because there are numbers that are not
real. The story of how they came to be discovered (or you might say invented)
is a fascinating one. Such numbers are called Complex numbers and to find
out what these peculiar numbers are you’ll find a brief description if you turn
to Appendix A page ??, or click on the page number.
1
.
0
What’s the answer? Does it have an answer? Strictly speaking no—because
it is the answer to the question: “how many 0’s do we need to add together
to get 1?"! However many 0’s we add together we would never get there, so
we could say the answer is an infinite number. If this isn’t clear, look at these
divisions:
1 1 1 1
= 10, = 100, = 1, 000, = 10, 000 and so on.
0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001
As the denominator gets smaller, the answer gets bigger.
More succinctly we say that as the denominator → 0 the fraction → ∞. Or,
1
in shorthand = ∞.
0
Treating ∞ as a number, what about this fraction?
1
∞
It’s asking the question “how many infinities are there in 1?" We can make
sense of his question if we use the same approach as before:
1 1 1 1
= 0.1, = 0.01, = 0.001, = 0.0001 and so on.
10 100 1000 100000
This time as the denominator → ∞ the fraction → 0. Summarising (and
using a shorthand that is strictly speaking illegal)
1 1
A
=∞ and = 0.
!
A
0 ∞ A
A
Exercises 1
q
112
p p p p p
(g) 7 (h) 2+ 3 (i) 2( 2 + 1) − 2
1
p
(j) 0.6̇ (k) 0.1̇
Solutions 1
−
11
1. (a) 1 (b) 1 59 = 14
9 (c) 31 ÷ 10 = 30
1
p p p
(g) 16 = 4 (h) Irrational (i) 2 + 2 − 2 = 2
q
(j) 1 ÷ 23 = 32 (k) 19 = 13
3,267,654 544,609
2. (a) 99,900 (b) 166,500
It easy to see that 2 and 3 divide into numerator and denominator. To look
for other possible factors find the prime factors of the denominator. We
could use the numerator but factorising the denominator is much easier.
None of its factors divide into the numerator. (Notice we don’t need the
complete prime factorisation of the denominator, just which primes divide
into it.)
4a × 3 × 2a = 4 × 3 × 2 × a × a = 24a 2
8 × 13y × 0.125 = 13y [because 8 × 0.125 = 1]
1 1
10x × x 2 = 10 × × x × x 2 = 5x 3
2 2
1 2 2
× y × 42 = 6y
7
8
It’s not difficult to see that, like multiplication, addition is also associative and
commutative. For example
(2 + 3) + 4 = 2 + (3 + 4) (associativity); 1 + 5 = 5 + 1 (commutativity).
Can you see that the same is not true of subtraction or division? For example
(7 − 1) − 3 6= 7 − (1 − 3); 6 − 2 6= 2 − 6.
Check for yourself that the same applies to division.
(d ) 1.25 × 7 × 16 (e) 3a × 5 × 2a 2 ( f ) 12 y × 8
9
(a) 7980 (b) 3 × 11 = 99 (c) 42 (d) 1.25 × 8 × 2 × 7 = 140
3
(e) 30a (f) 4y (g) 2x(x + 1) (h) 2 × 43p = 86p
We might, for example, have a set called K that consists of the numbers −7.5,
0, 4 and 99, or it might be a collection of numbers we already have a name for,
like N. We use curly brackets when listing what’s in the set.
K = {−7.5, 0, 4, 99}
N = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, . . .}
In the case of N, we can’t list them all but we can see how they are generated
and the dots tell us the sequence goes on indefinitely. Sometimes it’s
impossible to write what’s in the set in the form of a list—even an infinite
one, for example
R = {Real numbers}
and we have a shorthand way of writing this using the symbol ∈. For example,
using the sets we talked about in the previous section
99 ∈ K , 99 ∈ N and 0.146 ∈ R.
We would say “99 belongs to K " or “99 is a member of K ", and ‘5 belongs to
the set of Natural numbers", or better “5 is a Natural number" and “0.146 is a
Real number". We occasionally come across the symbol 6∈, meaning “is not a
member of", for example −1 6∈ N and π 6∈ Q.
Set language provides a powerful tool for precise thinking.
10
If you want to know more about this, and enjoy a bit of mental gymnastics,
Google “Russell’s paradox".
1.4.2 Subsets
A subset, as the name suggests, is a set within a set. Consider the set of
integers A = {4, 5, 6}, for example. One subset of these might be the set {4, 6};
let’s label this B . Another would be the set consisting of the single number
C = {4}. The symbol for “is a subset of" is ⊆, and the statement
A
4
6
5 HH
Y
H
B
N⊆Z⊆Q⊆R⊆C
C
R
Q
Z
N
This hasn’t told us anything new, it just adds a bit of clarity. For example
where do the irrationals fit into this picture? They are the in the region inside
R, but outside Q.
A simple non-numerical example of a subset might be P ⊆ T , where
T = {Triangles}
P = {Polygons}
You can no doubt think of many other examples, mathematical and
non-mathematical.
Why are we going to all this trouble to use fancy language and invent new
symbols to convey dead simple ideas? The answer is to avoid ambiguity. If
someone asked you to “pick a number between 1 and 10", they would
probably be surprised if you said “6 14 ", or “π". This is because all spoken
languages rely heavily on context to convey additional information (in this
case that the number should be a whole number). Even if the question says
“pick a whole number. . . ", it’s still not entirely clear whether the numbers 1
and 10 are allowed—the word “between" is used in both ways. If we rely on
spoken language we can’t avoid running into this kind of problem: that’s why
in mathematics we have to invent a certain amount of new language, and
define mathematical terms precisely.
If we were asking a mathematician to select the number we could ask her to
select an element of the set
{x ∈ Z : 1 ≤ x ≤ 10}.
We include a variable simply to avoid having to say “a number" (we’ve
chosen x here but we could have chosen any variable). The colon sign : is
read “given that" or “such that". The whole thing we therefore read as “the
set of integers greater than or equal zero and less than or equal to 10".
Naturally we alter the detail to convey exactly what we mean. Suppose the
solution to an inequality problem is “any number greater than 7.5" (i.e. not
including 7.5 itself), we would describe the solution as
{x ∈ R : x > 7.5}.
In this case we specify R rather than Z because there’s nothing to say we are
restricted to whole numbers. It’s not that we must always use set language,
but it is beautifully concise and precise.
For a mathematician, there’s an altogether more compelling reason: it is a
powerful tool for thinking deeply. Set language plays an absolutely central
role in Bertrand Russell’s famous book Principia Mathematica, which
established for the first time a rigorous foundation for the whole of
Mathematics.
The following section introduces two of the key concepts upon which set
theory is built.
K = {−7.5, 0, 4, 99}
N = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, . . .}
would be K ∩ N = {4, 99}.
But the answer may not be quite so obvious. The way two sets overlap will
always happen in one of three ways. We can show the possible
configurations using Venn diagrams:
Let’s take a simple example. Suppose the sets D, E and F are defined by
Starting with D ∩ E = {2, 4}, the Venn would look like this
0 E
D 6 2 1
8 4 3
10
E 1 2 F
3 6
8
4
0
F
D 2 6
4 8
10
X = {x ∈ R : x > 2} and Y = {x ∈ R : x ≤ 5}
X ∩ Y = {x ∈ R : 2 < x ≤ 5}
Let’s see what this looks like on a number line diagram. X and Y are shown
by the lines with blobs and X ∩ Y is where they both cover the number line.
X ◦ H
H
Y
H
H •
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
The blobs on the ends of the lines are a neat device for indicating whether
the end point is included or not. For example the top line has an empty blob
at the end because is represents the interval x > 2, so 2 is not included; the
line below it, representing x ≤ 5, has a solid blob at the end because 5 is
included. The absence of a blob at the end of a line signifies that it extends
indefinitely at that end (i.e. to +∞ or −∞).
X ∩Y ◦ •
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Union
The union of two sets A and B is the aggregation of all the elements in both
sets. To be more precise: the elements that belong either to A, or to B or to
both A and B .
It is written A ∪ B and once again there are three ways the union of two sets
can be formed.
A B
(a) The sets have no elements in common.
A ∪ B is the whole of A plus the whole of B .
before let’s see what this looks like for the sets D, E and F , defined by
0 E
D 6 2 1
8 4 3
10
E 1 2 F
3 6
8
4
0
F
D 2 6
4 8
10
Can you see that for the sets X and Y defined on the previous page,
X ∪ Y = R?
Does the notion of sets and set language stills seems a bit pointless to you?
Well, you’ll need to have a working knowledge of it because it will be used in
exam questions. As for using it yourself, the area where you’ll definitely need
it is in probability theory.
We’ll come across some other applications of the union and intersection of
sets later in this book. We end with a puzzle that illustrates in a light-hearted
way the issue of muddled thinking around sets.
A boy taken to see a doctor turns out to be the doctor’s son. But the
doctor is not the boy’s father. How is this possible?
It’s not a trick question in the sense that there are no step-relationships,
adoptions or IVF treatments involved, and there is only one doctor in the
consulting room. If you can’t work it out, the explanation is in the footnote11 .
Say whether each of these statements is true or false. (The answers are in the
footnote12 .)
π
(a) N ⊆ Z+ (b) 3
∈Q (c) Q ⊆ R
( f ) {all real numbers less than 1} ⊆ {all real numbers less than 2}
(g ) If x ∈ R, then x 2 ∈ Q
If you want to explore sets a little further or try some questions turn to
Appendix B page ??, or click on the page number.
11 The doctor is the boy’s mother. The set of doctors is not a subset of the set of men.
(a) T (The two sets are identical.) (b) F (π is not a rational number.) (c) T. (d ) F.
12 (e) T (φ is the empty set and an element of every set.) ( f ) T. (g ) T (Z− ⊆ Z ⊆ Q)
p p
(h) F (Sometimes true e.g. x = 51 , x = 2, but not always e.g. x = 1 + 2.)
1.5 Equations
It’s extraordinary to think that the = sign was not invented until the 16th
Century, when today equations lie at the heart of Mathematics. Designing an
aircraft wing or forecasting the weather both involve solving equations.
Sophisticated equations underpin the so-called “financial engineering" that
underpins some aspects of the modern global economy. Sometimes the
equation is so complicated that we can only solve it by trial and error
(generally using a computer), but here we’ll be studying equations that we
can solve directly using some kind of algorithm13 .
In this section we are just reminding you of the basics. You’ll find more
through explanations later on: Chapter 5 for linear equations, Chapter 7 for
quadratic equations, you’ll meet polynomial equations again in Chapters 4
and 8, and Chapter 12 for trigonometrical equations.
x3
3(1 − 5x) = x + 7 or = 12 − x 2 .
x −1
That’s when we need to learn some techniques.
The solutions of an equation are often called its roots;
Sometimers an equation will only have one root, sometimes it will have
more than one. Occasionally it will have an infinite number.
13
A series of steps that lead to the answer.
? × ? =0
5x = 0.
One of the two numbers must be zero. The left hand one clearly isn’t, so
x = 0.
A common application of the zero product principle is with quadratic
equations. For example if
x(x − 7) = 0
we can think of his as the two numbers x and x − 7 multiplied together14 . So
either
x =0 or x − 7 = 0
i.e. x =0 or x = 7.
(x − 10)(x + 2) = 0 ⇒ x − 10 = 0 or x + 2 = 0
⇒ x = 10 or x = −2.
14
Being adjacent to each other means they are multiplied. For example 5a means 5 × a.
15
⇒ means “implies"
It is not difficult to see that the zero product principle applies however many
numbers are multiplied together: the product of the numbers can’t be zero
unless at least one of the numbers is zero.
For example
x(x − 2)(x − 4) = 0.
This is a cubic equation: when we multiply it out we get
x 3 − 6x 2 + 8x = 0
but we can easily solve it. The zero product principle tells us that
x = 0, x − 2 = 0, or x − 4 = 0
Equations like
1p
2x = 32, sin x = 0.5, x+
+1 = 0
x3
are therefore not polynomial equations.
x 2 (1 − x 2 ) = 7
The answer17 is in the footnote.
17
Multiplying the bracket out gives x 2 − x 4 so the order is 4.
where the a, b and c in the formula refer to the coefficients of the quadratic
equation when it is written in the form
ax 2 + bx + c = 0
i.e. with zero on one side of the equation.
For example
2x 2 − 4x − 3 = 0.
a = 2, b = −4, c = −3, so
p
−b ± b 2 − 4ac
x =
2a
p
4 ± (−4)2 − 4(2)(−3)
=
4
p
4 ± 16 + 24
=
4
p p
4 + 40 4 − 40
= or
4 4
We could reach for our calculator at this point, and get the answers to as
many decimal points as we wish.
Alternatively we could keep the answer exact but simplify it:
p p p p p
40 = 4 × 10 = 4 10 = 2 10
so p
4 ± 2 10
x =
4
p p
2 + 10 2 − 10
= or
2 2
p
If you are unsure about how we rewrote 40, this is covered in Chapter 2.
1.6 Inequalities
An inequality18 is the same as an equation except the equals sign is replaced
by the sign
<, ≤, >, or ≥ .
Typical wording used to describe these relationships are:
Notice that the phrase “at least" includes the value itself. So for example a
score of “at least 10" means a score of 10 or above. Similarly a distance of at
most 50 miles means 50 miles or less.
Almost always inequalities have more solutions than equations do— usually
an infinite number. For example the solution of the inequality
2x + 1 < 7
i.e. x <3
Or in set notation {x : x < 3}.
Every single value of x smaller than 3 satisfies this inequality. And of course
there is an infinite number of such values.
We could represent the solution using a number line, where the empty circle
indicates that the value x = 3 is not included.
H
H ◦
−2 −1 0 1 2 3 4
H
H ◦
−2 −1 0 1 2 3 4
18
You may occasionally see it referred to as an inequation.
x +1 = 7 and 2(x + 1) = 2x + 3.
We say that the two sides of an identity are equivalent, and when we want to
make this explicit we use the sign ≡, rather than the = sign:
2(x + 3) ≡ 2x + 6
You have already met this concept in arithmetic: an equivalent fraction is the
same fraction just written a different way, so strictly speaking we should use
the ≡ sign when we write:
2 4
≡ .
3 6
The term identity is related to the word “identical"— a stronger term than
“equal". It is not essential to use the ≡ notation every time, in fact we usually
don’t. The key thing is to recognise the difference: with an equation we are
looking for the value (or values) of the variable that satisfies it. An identity
gives us an alternative way of writing something. Therein lies it’s power: it
provides a different way of looking at something.
10 − 5x = x
3y − 9 = 3(y − 3)
x2 = 9
x(x + 1) − (x − 1) = x 2 + 1
There is one important identity that crops up again and again in different
contexts. We will look at it now and remind you about it from time to time.
19
First and third are equations, the other two are identities.
x(x + 1) − (x − 1) = x 2 + x − x + 1 = x 2 + 1. If this is rusty don’t worry for now.
The difference of two squares identity is a simple but very valuable algebtraic
tool. It can also be used in some arithmetic situations. Of course we don’t
need to use it for arithmetic calculations since we can use a calculator. Our
main purpose here is to help you embed the relationship in your mind.
It turns the original calculation into one we can do in our head. The identity
can also be used in reverse.
sin2 x + cos2 x ≡ 1
It says that if we take the sine of an angle and the cosine of the same angle and
square each of them, the two numbers add up to 1—regardless of the angle
we choose.
For example if x = 30◦ , sin x = 0.5 and cos x = 0.866025 (to 6 DP), so we have
Try an example for yourself. It’s powerful because it’s far from obvious,
although as it happens it is easy to prove.
Notice that
when we write sin2 x and cos2 x, we mean (sin x)2 and (cos x)2 .
This is the convention that is adopted. It is certainly better than sin x 2 and
cos x 2 , which would mean that it is the quantity x that is being squared.
If you are very familiar with the function notation you may be able to skip this
section. The questions at the end of the chapter will tell you if you can safely
do this.
The concept of a function is very important in Maths. A simple example20
would be:
f (x) = x + 5.
We use a formula to describe the function. For example, if we start with the
number 2, f turns it into 7.
We would write f (2) = 7, f (−4) = 1 or f (−5) = 0.
For a reason that is about to become clear, it is actually better to think of a
function as a process rather than a formula: the process in this case is that of
“adding 5" to a number.
Imagine a magic box: a number is fed in at one end (the input) and a new
number (the output) comes out at the other end.
2 - f - 7
We could make the process notion even clearer in this case by labelling the
box like this:
−4 - +5 - 1
20
Because brackets can be used to indicate multiplication, f (x) could mean f × x.
The context will always tell you which it is.
a2 - f - a2 + 5
Or f (y − 3) = (y − 3) + 5 = y + 2
y −3 - f - y +2
The important thing to notice here is that the x in f (x) simply stands for
whatever number (arithmetic or algebraic) the function is going to operate
on. It’s like a place keeper; we input whatever value we want and f operates
on it to give an output.
Bearing this in mind an expression like f ( f (2)) makes sense. The function f
is going to operate on the number f (2). We know f (2) = 7, so
Another way you will see the same function described is like this:
f : x → x + 5.
We shall use both notations.
By the way since the x in the formula is just a “place keeper"; we could use
any algebraic symbol we like. We could equally well describe f by saying, for
example
f (t ) = t + 5 or f : t → t + 5.
Or
f (z) = z + 5 or f : z → z + 5.
It is this that separates functions from formulae. A formula describes the
relationship between certain variables, whereas
? - f - 12
We can extend this idea to a less obvious question, for example to solve the
equation
f (x) = 3x.
In plain English what number would we have to start with if the effect of
adding 5 to it is the same as trebling it? A little bit of algebra will tell us.
Since f (x) = x + 5, the statement f (x) = 3x is equivalent to saying
x + 5 = 3x
Subtracting x from both sides of the equation, we have 2x = 5, so x = 2.5.
We can verify this is correct: f (2.5) = 2.5 + 5 = 7.5 = 3 × 2.5.
Example
Solve the equations g (x) = 1, where
g (x) = 2x − 5
You won’t need to know any more about inverse functions at this stage, but if
want to delve a bit deeper go to page ?? in Appendix A (or click on the page
number).
Who could fail to be impressed by, and hugely grateful for, the monumental
advances brought to us by scientists. From microelectronics to DNA testing
to Black Holes the history of science reflects man’s ingenuity and dogged
dedication. But none of it is fact. For thousands of years some of the truly
great minds thought the Sun went around the Earth. Then Newton came
along and gave us his beautiful Laws of Motions. Along with numerous other
developments, they enabled humans to travel to the Moon.
Then Einstein came along and told us his Laws are not quite correct—and in
some cases far from correct. We find the same story in all branches of
science. What we understand today to be “scientific truth" is simply the
latest view. We see this very clearly in the field of cosmology where new
observations are routinely causing scientists to re-think their theories.
Mathematics is different. Once a mathematical
p fact has been established, it
is immutable. The Greeks established that 2 cannot be written as a fraction
using whole numbers. If you could find a way of doing it you’d become
famous, but it isn’t going to happen, because there is a mathematical proof
that it can never be done. It’s the absolute, timeless nature of Maths that
makes it unique,and what makes the notion of “proof" so important. A
proven mathematical statement we call a Theorem, which in turn can be
used as a building block for a further Theorem, and so on. The development
of Mathematics has been largely about doing this again and again, building
ever more sophisticated bodies of mathematical knowledge that now stretch
into almost every area of our lives. The whole edifice would be vulnerable to
collapse if we had a single doubt about any one of the building blocks.
Hence the need for rigour21 .
What makes mathematicians highly sought after is their ability to bring
rigorous, clear thinking to very complex problems. Calculations may be
needed too, but in real life situations that is often the easy bit. So an essential
part of mathematical training is developing an ability to think
rigorously—that means not jumping to invalid conclusions.
21
Mathematicians haven’t always regarded it necessary; it would be well into the 19th
Century, after some serious blunders, before they woke up to the fact.
Direct proof
This is the commonest type: using a series of logical steps, building on
previously proved results. For example the proof that the angles of a triangle
add up to 180◦ . Or indeed Pythagoras’ Theorem.
Proof by exhaustion
We can sometimes show that somethings is true for all possible cases. An
example would be that if n is an integer either n 4 or n 4 − 1 is divisible by 56.
This seemingly impossible task is easily cracked when we see that the last
digit of the fourth power comes from raising the final digit of the original
number to the power 4. So for example if the number n ends in 3, then the
last digit of n 4 is 34 = 81, i.e. it ends in 1. All we have to do is check this for all
the integers 0, 1, 2, 3, . . . 9. When we do this we find n 4 always ends in 0, 1, 5 or
6, and the result follows.
Proof by contradiction
This can sometimes be used if we can show that the opposite is not true. If
you ask a young child what the largest number is they will often say a billion,
or a trillion, or a trillion trillion. We know of course that there is no largest
number and don’t need to prove it. But it is easy to prove, by assuming that
there is a largest number, call it N . But then N + 1 is a larger one, which
contradicts our assumption that N is the largest number. Our assumption
must have been wrong: there is no largest number.
Disproof by counterexample
Sometimes we want prove that a statement is not true. This usually when it
seems to be true, or is evidently true in most cases. We want to know if it is
always true. For example the statement “3x = kx implies that k = 3". The
counterexample would be x = 0.
Proof by induction
This is another method, which you are likely to meet if you continue to study
maths to a higher level. Conceptually it is more difficult to understand than
other methods so we won’t attempt to illustrate it here.
x =3 ⇒ x2 = 9
Implicit in the use of the symbols is the word “definitely" or “always". The
statement on the right is definitely true if the statement on the left is true.
Clearly
The symbol ⇐ means “is implied by",
or
x2 = 9 ⇐ x =3
However it clearly wouldn’t be correct to say
or
x2 = 9 ⇒ x =3
because neither follows for certain. “This month" could equally well be April,
September or November, and x could be −3.
The ⇐⇒ symbol is for when the implication does apply both ways, e.g.
x +1 = 5 ⇒ x =4
x +1 = 5 ⇐ x =4
in which case we can replace the two statements by the single statement
x +1 = 5 ⇐⇒ x =4
For each of these statements fill in the appropriate sign: ⇒,⇐, ⇐⇒ or none
of them.
Similarly, when the implication goes the other way, we can use the the
symbol ∵ meaning “because", rather than ⇐, and write:
22
(a) ⇐ (b) ⇐⇒ (c) none apply.
Exercises 2
In each case see if you think the statement is true. If so, try to prove it; if not
try to disprove it.
3. a 2 = ax ⇒ x = a
4. b x = 1 ⇒ x = 0
7. Today did Monday. My birthday is in 100 days. Show that it will fall on
a Wednesday this year.
10. Their exit a pair of prime numbers other than 2 and 3 that differ by 1.
11. The difference between any two prime numbers greater than 2 is an
even number.
1 1
12. x > y ⇒ x < y .
1
13. If n is an integer 2 n(n + 1) is also an integer.
15. The 100th term of the Fibonacci sequence is an odd number. [This is
the sequence formed by string with two 1’s and adding the previous two
terms to get the next. So it starts 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, . . . .]
m2
16. If m and n are even numbers, then n is even.
20. In a class of 28 students at least two have a surname starting with the
same letter.
Solutions 2
5. True. Let the number be n, n +1 and n +2. Their sum is 3n +3 = 3(n +1).
8. True. An odd number can be written 2n +1 for some integer n. The next
odd number is 2n + 3. Their sum is therefore 4n + 4 = 4(n + 1).
10. Not true. For any two consecutive numbers one his odd, the other even.
But all prime numbers greater than 2 are odd numbers.
12. Not true. Counterexample: any values for which x > 0 and y < 0.
15. True. Look at the parity of each term (whether it is odd or even). It goes
O, O, E, O, O, E, O, O, E etc. Every third term is even, so the 99th term is
even and the 100th is odd.
17. True. Since a and b are rational there will be integers p, q, r, and s such
p r pr
that a = q and b = s . Therefore ab = q s so ab is rational.
p
18. Not true. Counterexample a = 2.
20. True. Proof by contradiction. Suppose all the surnames start with a
different letter. We would need 28 letters in the alphabet.
23. True. p 1 and p 2 are odd, so their product will be odd and p 1 p 2 + 1 is
even, so is not a prime.
An elegant proof
The following problem illustrates the power of simple reasoning.
At first sight it seems impossibly hard. Take a chessboard, which has
8 × 8 = 64 squares. Now suppose we have 32 dominoes, each of which covers
two squares of the chessboard exactly. So all 32 dominoes could cover the
entire chessboard. There are, of course, a great many ways of doing this.
What if we now cut away a square from two opposite corners, and discard
one of the dominoes. The question is can we cover the (mutilated)
chessboard with the 31 dominoes? Spend a few minutes thinking about the
problem.
I can tell you that any attempt is bound to fail. For a beautifully simple
reason why, turn to Appendix A (page ??), or click on the page number.
Apart from the sheer joy of a powerful proof, there is another point to
describing it. It’s about elegance and creativity. It has been said that a good
mathematician is a lazy one—because she will always look for an easy
method. You can start straight away to look for quick methods for yourself.
−5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5
23
The number − 5 is less than the number 1 because it is to the left of 1 on the number
line.
If you don’t readily remember that < means "less than" and > means "greater than”,
just remember that the thin end of the sign is always next to the smaller number, and the
fat end is always next to the larger number.
The same applies when the calculation is algebraic; the number line principle
tells us what the relationship is between the two quantities even though we
don’t mark them on an actual line, e.g.
3a − 7a = −4a
−71x + 50x = −21x
−10 + 700
29x − 31x
−100y − 90y
We are now in a position to home in on some of the common errors that arise
with directed numbers. We can avoid them all if we use what I call the box
principle.
24
690, −2x, −190y
To someone new to directed numbers this might look like one subtraction
and one addition. Or is it two subtractions?
It’s best to think of it as a series of steps, moving up and down the number
line:
−5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5
−2: we start at − 2;
−3: we move 3 to the left, bringing us to − 5;
+9: we move 9 to the right, which brings us to 4.
−
2 − 3 + 9 = 4.
It would be quite nice if we could rearrange the order of the numbers if we
wanted to, but it’s not obvious where the minus signs would go.
−2 −3 +9
In this form we can rearrange the boxes in any way we like. e.g.
−2 +9 −3 or +9 −2 −3
Notice that it doesn’t matter which sort of minus sign it is. This is why we say
they are interchangeable.
We don’t need to physically put the boxes in. The important thing is to “see"
the numbers in this way—with the signs in front of them super-glued to them.
After a while it becomes so instinctive it’s impossible to think in any other
way. The benefit of being able to rearrange the numbers is very apparent in
the following example, where we can combine the numbers in convenient
pairs:
!
A
A
• Think: number line. A
2y − x − 5y + 8x
25
−3y + 7x or 7x − 3y
−5 − 2 ?
The answer is −7. But what about the rule that says “two minuses make a
plus"? That suggests the answer is +7, or is it +10? In the following sections
we’ll see exactly when that “rule" applies.
++ 5 = +5.
If the signs are different, it’s equivalent to having a single minus sign.
+− 5 = -5 −+ 5 = -5 .
how come −− 5 = +5 ?
Similarly −− 3 = +3
−− 7 = +7
−− 3x 2 = +3x 2 etc
6 −− 4 = 6 + 4 = 10.
Let’s put all this together: the box principle plus combining adjacent signs.
We have used the box principle, thinking of the calculation as four numbers
added together, two of which happen to be negative. And we’ve rearranged
them to make the mental arithmetic a bit easier.
26
(i) −7 (ii) a
3a = 3 ×− 5
You probably know the answer to this is − 15, which we can easily verify:
3 ×− 5 =− 5 +− 5 +− 5 = -5 -5 -5 =− 15
Similarly − 3 × 5 = 5 ×− 3 =− 15.
It remains to deal with − 3 ×− 5. The answer can’t also be − 15, since changing
the sign of one of the numbers must make a difference to the answer. So the
answer has27 to be
−
3 ×− 5 =+ 15.
The rules for dividing directed numbers come from the same rules. For
example, from relationships like 3 ×− 5 =− 15, we can see that
− −
15 − 15 − 15
= 5, −3
= 5 and −3
=+ 5.
3
27
Or if you are not persuaded by this:
−
3 ×− 5 = −(− 5) − (− 5) − (− 5) = +5 + 5 + 5 = +15.
Summarising, the sign rules for multiplying and dividing directed numbers
are:
+
3 × 5 = 15
− −
3 × 5 = 15
− −
3 × 5 = 15
− − +
3 × 5 = 15
15 +
= 5
3
−
15 −
= 5
3
15 −
−3
= 5
−
15 +
−3
= 5
!
A
• two directed numbers are multiplied or divided. A
A
For example
2.3.5 means 2 × 3 × 5 = 30.
Depending on how you write your x’s the notation avoids possible confusion
between x and ×.
But it may also strike you as odd: how do we know that the multiplication 5.2
doesn’t mean the decimal 5.2? In practice this is never an issue: we only adopt
the notation where the meaning is unambiguous.
In the expression
1 + 1.2 + 1.2.3 + 1.2.3.4
the terms follow a pattern which clearly relates to integers. Anyway we can
see from the later terms that the dots can’t be decimal points. The dots in
this context signify multiplication.
With negative integers, we can still use a dot, for example 7.− 2, meaning 7 ×−
2, but the dot could be overlooked—and the expression misread as 7 − 2. It
would be better to use a bracket28 —and write
7(− 2).
Similarly we would use bracket writing things like this:
¡1¢¡
− 12 − 32 .
¢¡ ¢
(−6)(−8) and 2
28
The meaning of y(−2) is clear because in algebra being adjacent to means multiply.
But most important of all, whatever notation you use make sure it’s
unambiguous. Not just for another reader (like an examiner), but for
yourself.
The more algebraic our work, the more helpful all of this is, as we shall see next.
29
Measured in kilograms, the first number is about half the the mass of a bus;
the second is about half the mass of the earth.
Example 1
However sure you are of the directed number rules—and brilliant at mental
arithmetic—doing all this entirely in your head would be risky.
Example 2
2a 2 −5b−c
Substitute a = −3, b = 5 and c = −1 into the expression .
1−ac
Example 3
Example 4
p
Simplify b 2 − 4ac, given that a = k, b = −k and c = −2k.
p p
b 2 − 4ac = (−k)2 − 4k(−2k)
p
= k 2 + 8k 2
p
= 9k 2 = 3k
You will find some examples to try for yourself in the Exercises that follow.
A cautionary tale
While on the subject of combining directed numbers we take some time out
for a diversion that we think you will find intriguing.
S = 1−2+3−4+5−6+7−8+9...
Exercises 3
1. Evaluate the following entirely in your head (use the box principle)
(a) − 4 + 7 (b) 2 − 6 + 11 (c) −1 − 2 − 3 − 4 + 10
(d) −1 − 5 (e) −12 − 27 + 50 (f) −9 + 11 − 1
(g) 26 − 73 + 44 − 1 (h) −150 − 90 + 310 − 20
(i) 2.3 − 18.9 + 11.6 − 10 (j) 1.4 − 1.5 + 1.6 − 1.7 + 1.8 − 1.9
(d) 4 +− 3 −− 6 (e) −7 −− 5 (f ) 1 −− 3 +− 9
(e) −8x y + 4y x + 4x y (f ) 6a − 8b − a + 2b
(i) −4p 3 − 3p 2 − 2p
(c) x 2 + y 2 , y = −x
(d) x 3 + y 3 , y = −x
Solutions 3
(p) + 80
4 = 20 (q)1 − 16 = −15 (r) −4 + 5 = 1 (s) 200
(t) (−2)2 (−2)2 (−2) = (+4)(+4)(−2) = −32
4. (a) 13a (b) −5y (c) 14b (d) 13x 2 [Box principle.]
7. (a) (−3x)2 = 9x 2
1 1
• Infinity is an undefined number but we write 0 = ∞ and ∞ = 0