Actuator Selection and Sizing
Actuator Selection and Sizing
Instrumentation Department
Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Engineering, Navi Mumbai
1. Linear: Gives linear relationship between flow rate and stem travel
𝑄 = 𝑆
𝑄 𝑆
𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑚𝑎𝑥
2. Quick Opening: with a small change in stem travel there is fast change in flow
rate.
3. Equal Percentage: Gives same % change in flow rate for a given % change in
stem position.
𝑆
(𝑆 )
𝑄 = 𝑄𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑅
𝑅 = 𝑅𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦
Numerical:
Q) A control valve operates from 3 to 15 psi control signal to have 40 gallons per
minute flow rate. Express the signal i/p in terms of psi & % of range if
a) It is a linear valve from 0 to 90 gpm &
b) It is an equal % valve with rangeability 6 & 𝑄𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 15 𝑔𝑝𝑚
𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐
0 = (3) + 𝑐 1
90 = (15) + 𝑐 2
𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐
𝑦 = 7.5𝑥 − 22.5
For y=40
40 = 7.5𝑥 − 22.5
7.5𝑥 = 40 + 22.5
62.5
𝑥=
7.5
𝑥 = 8.33 𝑝𝑠𝑖
for 40 gpm i/p signal is 8.33 psi
Similarly, % of range for i/p signal 8.33 psi out of 3-15 psi,
8.33
∗ 100 = 69.41%
15−3
𝑆
( )
2.67 = 6 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑆
𝑆
log(2.67) = log (6( 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 )) = 𝑙𝑜𝑔6
𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑆
= 0.546
𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥
= 54.6%
54.6% is the stem travel & the valve being equal % & the same value for % of a
range of flow rate.
I/P signal=54.7% of (15-3) of range
54.7 ∗ 12 = 6.564 𝑝𝑠𝑖
100
ACTUATOR DESIGN
Below tables provide more specific recommendations depending on whether the system is for liquid
level, pressure control, flow control or any other type of system.
Actuator is defined as a device which receives the control signal from controller &
gives appropriate motion to the valve stem.
It also gives support to valve accessories such as valve positioner.
It is used to overcome the forces which are unbalanced due to friction, weight of
the moving part & control valve pressure drop.
A common misconception in our industry is that actuating a valve is as simple as
putting the most cost-efficient actuator on top of your valve of choice, but the
process is much more complicated than that. Selecting the correct actuator for the
size and purpose of the valve is key, but it’s only the first step. If the actuator isn’t
sized by a knowledgeable and technically trained expert, the results can be
disastrous and/or expensive.
When sizing an automated valve, the actuator must operate properly when on
demand, especially on Emergency Shutdown Valves (ESDVs). With constantly
increasing safety demands, more actuator buyers are taking the extra step of
requesting actuator sizing documentation.
For an actuator to be reliable, it must:
An undersized actuator will be unable to operate the valve; on the other hand, an
oversized actuator has the potential to damage the stem of the valve as well as
being higher priced.
To size an actuator correctly, we need to understand:
Let’s look at what is required concerning the minimum and maximum supply
pressure. The normal pressure, which is often provided alongside the minimum and
maximum, should never be used to size the actuator.
Spring return actuators use pressure to create a driving force in one direction and
a spring to return to the “home” position. Spring return actuators are usually
selected when the automated valve does not need to depend on an external motive
power to go to its home (open or close) position. For example, safety applications
like ESDVs most likely would need a spring return actuator.
Double-acting actuators use pressure to create a driving force to move in both
extend and retract directions. Double-acting actuators are usually selected when the
valve needs to stay in place (fail last) after the control signal or the supply pressure
has been lost. They also tend to be less expensive than spring return actuators.
As with any technical decision, many factors can impact which actuator is the
safest and most efficient option for your specific need. By working with engineers
and qualified supplier specialists, you will get the most out of the right valve
system for your unique application.
2. Torque and size of the valve: Large size and high pressure class
valves (such as a 30″ Class 1500 ball valve) require high torque for
operation. Selection of a very large pneumatic actuator for such a
large valve is not economical. A hydraulic actuator is recommended
in this case.
Actuator Basics-
The operating force is derived from compressed air pressure, which is applied to a
flexible diaphragm. The actuator is designed so that the force resulting from the air
pressure, multiplied by the area of the diaphragm, overcomes the force exerted (in
the opposite direction) by the spring(s).
With a larger valve and/or a higher differential pressure to work against, more
force is needed to obtain full valve movement.
To create more force, a larger diaphragm area or higher spring range is needed.
This is why controls manufacturers offer a range of pneumatic actuators to match a
range of valves – comprising increasing diaphragm areas, and a choice of spring
ranges to create different forces.
The diagrams in Figure 6.6.3 show the components of a basic pneumatic actuator
and the direction of spindle movement with increasing air pressure.
Shown in Figure 6.6.4. A direct acting pneumatic actuator is coupled to a control
valve with a reverse acting plug (sometimes called a ‘hanging plug’).
The choice between direct acting and reverse acting pneumatic controls depends on
what position the valve should revert to in the event of failure of the compressed
air supply. Should the valve close or be wide-open? This choice depends upon the
nature of the application and safety requirements. It makes sense for steam valves
to close on air failure, and cooling valves to open on air failure. The combination
of actuator and valve type must be considered.
Types of actuators- various combinations to give different types-
Diagram1 – Air to close/ Fail Open Direct action actuator(increase in signal stem
moves down)
Diagram2- Air to close/ Fail Open Reverse action actuator(increase in signal stem
moves up)
Diagram3- Air to Open/ Fail Close Reverse action actuator(increase in signal stem
moves up)
Diagram4- Air to Open/ Fail Close Direct action actuator(increase in signal stem
moves down)
Forces acting on Actuator to be considered while designing Actuator-
The forces to be considered while designing the actuator are static forces &
dynamic forces. Static forces are those that exist with the valve under pressure
but with no fluid flow in it whereas dynamic forces are created by the flow of fluid
flowing through valve.
1. Force due to friction
The source of friction is used mainly the stem packing used for actuator.
2. Diaphragm Force:
It is the force that acts on the diaphgram.
i. Air to Close
o Opening
D=min air supply x diaphragm area
o Closing
D=max air supply x diaphragm area
4. Unbalanced Force:
This force is defined as the one which exists due to moving parts in the
valve. Note that always take absolute value (positive value) of unbalanced
force
a. For fail to close actuator
𝑢 = 𝑘ℎ∆𝑃𝑒𝐴𝑝 − 𝑃1𝐴𝑠
Where 𝑘ℎ= fluid force coefficient due to fractional valve stem
Travel
∆𝑃𝑒=Effective pressure drop
𝐴𝑝=Area of plug
𝐴𝑠=Area of stem
𝑃𝑉
𝐹𝐹 = 0.96 − 0.28 √
𝑃𝐶
𝑃1−𝑃2
𝐹𝐿 =
𝑃1−𝑃𝑉𝐶
𝑃𝑉𝐶 = 𝐹𝐹 𝑃𝑉
Therefore, ∆𝑃𝑒 = 𝐹𝐿 2(𝑃1 − 𝑃𝑉 )
Note: Flashing should be considered only while opening & many a
times unbalanced area is treated as plug area in this equation.
Closing Closing
D= F+ S+ u+ 𝑆𝑡 S= D+ u+ F+ 𝑆𝑡
Note: Unbalanced force should always be taken as absolute value (i.e. positive
value)
Step 4: Seat Force
𝑆𝑡 = 50 ∗ 𝜋 ∗ 𝐷𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑡
1
= 50 ∗ 𝜋 ∗
2
= 78.53 𝑙𝑏
S = F+ D - u
= 50+207-4.54 ..................................... (Take positive 4.54)
= 252.46
For closing
ii. 𝐷 = 𝐹 + 𝑆 + 𝑢 + 𝑆𝑡
𝑆 = 𝐷 − 𝐹 − 𝑢 − 𝑆𝑡
= 1035 − 50 − 9.81 − 78.53
= 896.6
Now we change the packing material. Teflon V-ring with asbestos packing.
Therefore, 𝐹𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡 = 𝐷𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 ∗ 170
1
= ∗ 170 = 85 𝑙𝑏
2
𝑆𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹 + 𝐷 − 𝑢
= 85 + 207 − 4.54
= 287.46
𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒
Spring travel= 𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒
287.46
=
275
= 1.045 > 1
Conclusion- Therefore, with Asbestos packing the spring rate of 275 is sufficient
for the actuator to work satisfactorily.
Numerical 2- Check if the following actuator is satisfactory
FTC (Fail to close) service
Fluid=Benzene
Packing=Pure Graphite
Actuator area=69” square
Diaphragm pressure=3-36 psig
PV (vapor pressure) =18 psia
PC (critical pressure) =701 psia
Plug area=0.34” square
Cage seat friction=45 lb
Seat force=50 lb per inch of circumference
7
Seat diameter=2 inch
8
Spring rate=1100
𝐹𝐿=0.56
Fluid pressure=615-10 psig for closing
=600-15 psig for opening
𝑃𝑉
𝐹𝐹 = 0.96 − 0.28 √
𝑃𝐶
18
= 0.96 − 0.28√ = 0.915
701
𝑃𝑉𝐶 = 𝐹𝐹 𝑃𝑉
= 0.915 ∗ 18 = 16.47 𝑝𝑠𝑖𝑎
∆𝑃𝑒 = 𝐹𝐿2(𝑃1 − 𝑃𝑉 )
= 0.562(600 − 16.47) = 187.995 𝑝𝑠𝑖𝑎
𝑢 = 𝑘ℎ∆𝑃𝑒𝐴𝑝 − 𝑃1𝐴𝑠
For opening,
𝜋 1
𝑢𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 = −2 ∗ 187.995 ∗ 0.34 − (600) ∗ ∗ ( ) 2
4 2
𝑢𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 = −245.29 𝑙𝑏
For closing,
𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑘ℎ∆𝑃𝑒𝐴𝑝 − 𝑃1𝐴𝑠
= −1 ∗ 605 ∗ 0.34 − 615 ∗ 0.196
= −329.12
𝑆𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝐷 + 𝑢 + 𝐹 + 𝑆𝑡
= 207 + 320 + 215 + 451.60
= 1194.6 𝑙𝑏
Numerical 3-
Design an actuator for the following application
Control valve used is 6” cage guided angle valve, type – FTC
Packing – TFE asbestos
1
Travel- 1 ”
2
1
Stem- ”
2
7
Seat- 2 ”
8
Cage seat friction= 40 lb
Stem friction= 160 lb
Seat force= 200 lb per inch
Unbalanced area= 0.34” sq
𝐹𝐿2 = 0.45
𝑘ℎ = −1 for closing
= −2 for opening
Solution-
(Note- When stem friction and cage seat friction are given packing friction is
neglected)
Type of valve- FTC (ATO)
Step1- To calculate frictional force
𝑃𝑉
𝐹𝐹 = 0.96 − 0.28 √
𝑃𝐶
300
= 0.96 − 0.28√ = 0.8743
3206
𝑃𝑉𝐶 = 𝐹𝐹 𝑃𝑉
= 0.8743 ∗ 300 = 262.3 𝑝𝑠𝑖𝑎
∆𝑃𝑒 = 𝐹𝐿2(𝑃1 − 𝑃𝑉 )
= 0.45(600 − 262.3) = 151.965𝑝𝑠𝑖𝑎
𝜋 2
***Note- or Unbalanced area
𝐴𝑝 = 4 ∗ 𝐷 𝑝𝑙𝑢𝑔
𝑢 = 𝑘ℎ∆𝑃𝑒𝐴𝑝 − 𝑃1𝐴𝑠
For opening,
𝜋 1
𝑢𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 = −2 ∗ 151.965 ∗ 0.34 − (600) ∗ ∗ ( ) 2
4 2
𝑢𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 = −220.9362 𝑙𝑏
For closing,
𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑘ℎ∆𝑃𝑒𝐴𝑝 − 𝑃1𝐴𝑠
= −1 ∗ 615 ∗ 0.34 − 615 ∗ 0.196
= −329.025 𝑙𝑏
𝑆𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝐷 + 𝑢 + 𝐹 + 𝑆𝑡
= 0 + 329.025 + 200 + 451.60
= 980.625 𝑙𝑏